DOCSLIB.ORG

Phonetics and Phonotactics of Vowel Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phonetics and Phonotactics of Vowel Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac PHONETICS AND PHONOTACTICS OF VOWEL LARYNGEALIZATION IN UPPER NECAXA TOTONAC Rebekka Puderbaugh University of Edinburgh [email protected] ABSTRACT and Tlachichilco Tepehua [33]. As a result, word final vowels frequently are devoiced, laryngealized, The present paper reports on an investigation of the or dropped entirely. phonetics and phonotactics of vowel laryngealiza- Little is known about the phonetics of laryngeal- tion in Upper Necaxa Totonac. Using analysis tech- ized vowels into Totonacan, but some preliminary niques inspired by corpus linguistics, an analysis acoustic analyses have been performed. In Pa- of transcribed dictionary forms revealed a highly pantla Totonac, non-modal vowels were found to significant relationship between vowel laryngealiza- have overall lower intensity than modal vowels, and tion and the consonant that followed immediately tokens produced with stiff voice appeared to be as- after the vowel. Specifically, laryngealized vowels sociated with the spread of voicing onto preceding were far more likely to occur before glottal stops stops [16]. In Misantla Totonac, Trechsel & Faber than non-laryngealized vowels were. Further to [31] measured the F1-F2 vowel space and the dif- these findings, an acoustic measure of voice quality ference in amplitude between F0 and F1 (a mea- (H1-H2) was extracted from multiple time points of sure they refer to as VQI, for Voice Quality Index). laryngealized and non-laryngealized vowels before The analysis revealed a high degree of interspeaker and after glottal stops and other consonants. A sta- variability in the F1-F2 space, but a more stable tistical comparison of H1-H2 values between vowels outcome with respect to VQI: laryngealized vowels in various contexts revealed that vowels followed by had lower VQI scores than non-laryngealized vow- glottal stops had stronger indications of non-modal els for both speakers. A recent study of duration and phonation regardless of their own laryngealization vowel space in UNT found that laryngealized vow- category, while vowel laryngealization itself did not els tended to have lower F0 than non-laryngealized affect H1-H2. In light of these findings, the the la- vowels [11]. ryngealized vowels may be interpreted as resulting Phonation types have highly variable acoustic from collocation with glottal stops instead of bear- profiles across langauges, with differences depend- ing contrastive larygnealization themselves. ing in part on whether the phonation is contrastive or allophonic, breathy, creaky, or otherwise modified. Keywords: Meso-America, documentation, laryn- Spectral and acoustic measures have been found to gealized vowels, phonotactics, phonation differentiate between modal and non-modal phona- tion types in several languages including English, 1. INTRODUCTION Korean, and Hmong [12], Mazatec, Mpi, and Chong [6], Zapotec [10], and Gujarati [9, 17], among oth- Upper Necaxa Totonac (ISO [tku], hereafter UNT) ers. The difference in amplitude between the first is a Totonacan language spoken by approximately and second harmonics, often reported as H1-H2, or 3400 people in four communities situated along the H1*-H2* when adjusted for first and second for- Upper Necaxa River in the Sierra Norte of Puebla, mant values, appears to be the most reliable mea- Mexico. Like other languages of the Totonacan fam- sure for differentiating phonation types across lan- ily, UNT is supposed to maintain a phonation con- guages [19, 29], though unadjusted H1-H2 may also trast between laryngealized and non-laryngealized be used [18]. In addition to spectral differences, the vowels [4]. This contrast may occur with any of timing of vowel phonation is affected by contrastive- UNT’s contrastive vowel qualities, as well as ei- ness: non-modal phonation lasts longer and is more ther of two contrastive lengths (short and long). highly differentiated from modal phonation when Vowel laryngealization may also indicate phono- the phonation differences are contrastive than when logical phrase boundaries, as is the case in other they are non-contrastive [6, 12]. In Hupa, allophonic related language varieties, such as Coatepec To- laryngealization spreads from following consonants tonac [21, 24, 25], Filomeno Mata Totonac [23], onto a portion of preceding vowels, but never laryn- gealizes the entire length of the vowel [13]. Acous- text. Chi-squared tests were performed on these tic analysis may therefore reveal evidence for inter- count data in order to determine whether laryngeal- preting laryngealization as either allophonic or con- ization of context segments was related to laryngeal- trastive in UNT. ization of target segments. In the present paper, the relationship between glottal stops and laryngealized vowels in UNT is 2.2. Results explored from two perspectives. First, a colloca- tional analysis of vowels and stops demonstrates that Count data for stops and vowels are reported in Ta- glottal stops are highly likely to be preceded by la- ble 1. Non-laryngealized vowels occurred in higher ryngealized vowels. Second, H1-H2 values from proportions across both oral and glottal stops, as vowels in a variety of segmental contexts are ana- would be expected given the higher proportion of lyzed, revealing that the presence of a glottal stop non-laryngealized vowels in the dictionary overall. has a greater effect on laryngealization than does the Figure 1 illustrates the distributions of stops. Both vowel laryngealization category itself. oral and glottal stops appeared in comparable pro- 2. SEGMENTAL COLLOCATES OF VOWEL portions before laryngealized and non-laryngealized LARYNGEALIZATION IN TRANSCRIPTION vowels. After vowels, over 88% of glottal stops occurred after laryngealized vowels, and more than 2.1. Methods 70% of oral stops occurred after non-laryngealized vowels. A complementary pattern was apparent in The materials for the present analysis were extracted vowels (Figure 2): 65% of laryngealized vowels from the digital version of the Upper Necaxa To- occurred before glottal stops, and more than 90% tonac Dictionary [5]. All forms were included in of non-laryngealized vowels occurred before oral the analysis, including head words, inflected forms, stops. and affixes that received their own entries. Table 1: Count data of stops and vowels in their The data required little pre-processing before in- preceding and following environments. clusion in the analysis because the orthography of UNT is transparent at the phonemic level. Dic- Before vowels After vowels tionary forms were copied into a plaintext file for- Oral 9676 5494 mat, then transliterated into IPA using grep and Glottal 2419 3400 regex (regular expressions) find-and-replace meth- Before stops After stops ods. Following a method similar to [3], transcrip- Laryng V 4603 3425 tions were accepted as given in the published dic- Non-laryng V 4295 8676 tionary. Because some segments were encoded by complex character sequences (i.e affricate digraphs, ejective fricatives, vowels with length, stress and Figure 1: Stops before and after vowels, divided larygnealization diacritics), phonemic symbols were by laryngeal type. Black bars represent non- laryngealized vowels; gray bars represent laryn- delimited by inserted spaces on either side. Word gealized vowels. boundary markers (#) were inserted at the end of each word to ensure that segments were not inter- preted as adjacent across word boundaries. The resulting list of prepared segment data was then converted into a single text string from which immediately preceding and following seg- ments were identified for all segments using the shift function from the data.table package [8] in R [27]. Segmental collocates of stops and vowels only are analyzed here. Vowels were divided into laryngeal- ized and non-laryngealized, while stops were di- vided into oral and glottal subsets. The results of the collocation analysis revealed a strong relationship between glottal stops and the la- ryngealization of vowel that precede them. These The tabulated data was analyzed using a Chi- data were further subdivided and cross-tabulated ac- squared test that revealed a highly significant rela- cording to the laryngealization of the relevant con- tionship between stop type and vowel laryngealiza- and all speakers were presented with words in the Figure 2: Vowels before and after stops, divided by stop type (oral/glottal). Black bars represent same list order. The procedure for recording the oral stops; gray bars represent glottal stops. word list was explained to speakers prior to begin- ning the recording. Speakers were asked to repeat each word three times within the frame sentence in ixla wanli’ ... chuwa [Sla wanli ... tSuwa] ’he said ... now’. During recording, speakers˜ had access to written forms and translations, as well as discussion with the author. Audio data were segmented and transcribed in Praat [7] according to the dictionary form of word items, rather than a close transcription of the pho- netic signal. Boundaries were placed between vow- els and adjacent glottal stops based on the regular- ity of oscillation period. H1-H2 measures were ex- tracted from vowel tokens using a Praat script de- signed to imitate the measures taken by the Voice- tion in both preceding and following environments. Sauce software developed at UCLA [32, 28]. Vowel Oral stops were more likely to precede laryngeal- quality was included in the linear models as a ran- ized vowels than would be expected given the over- dom intercept, allowing for the model to adjust all proportion of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phonological Use of the Larynx: a Tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière
    Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière To cite this version: Jacqueline Vaissière. Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial. Larynx 97, 1994, Marseille, France. pp.115-126. halshs-00703584 HAL Id: halshs-00703584 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00703584 Submitted on 3 Jun 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vaissière, J., (1997), "Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial", Larynx 97, Marseille, 115-126. PHONOLOGICAL USE OF THE LARYNX J. Vaissière UPRESA-CNRS 1027, Institut de Phonétique, Paris, France larynx used as a carrier of paralinguistic information . RÉSUMÉ THE PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THE LARYNX Cette communication concerne le rôle du IS PROTECTIVE larynx dans l'acte de communication. Toutes As stated by Sapir, 1923, les langues du monde utilisent des physiologically, "speech is an overlaid configurations caractéristiques du larynx, aux function, or to be more precise, a group of niveaux segmental, lexical, et supralexical. Nous présentons d'abord l'utilisation des différents types de phonation pour distinguer entre les consonnes et les voyelles dans les overlaid functions. It gets what service it can langues du monde, et également du larynx out of organs and functions, nervous and comme lieu d'articulation des glottales, et la muscular, that come into being and are production des éjectives et des implosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac Rebekka Puderbaugh
    Laryngealization in Upper Necaxa Totonac by Rebekka Puderbaugh A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics University of Alberta Examining committee: Dr. Anja Arnhold, Supervisor Dr. David Beck, Supervisor Dr. Benjamin V. Tucker, Examiner Dr. Stephanie Archer, Examiner Dr. Ryan Shosted, External examiner Dr. John Nychka, Pro Dean © Rebekka Puderbaugh, 2019 Abstract This dissertation examines laryngealization contrasts in vowels and fricatives in Upper Necaxa Totonac. In vowels the contrast is presumed to be realized as a form of non- modal phonation, while fricatives are supposed to differ according to their production mechanism. The goal of this dissertation is to provide evidence that will help to deter- mine whether the phonetic characteristics of these sounds align with the impressionistic descriptions of their phonological categories. Laryngealization categories were first examined via a corpus analysis in Chapter 3. The analysis revealed a highly frequent co-occurrence of laryngealized vowels and following glottal stops. No relationship was found between vowel laryngealization and ejective fricatives. In Chapter 4 an analysis of the difference in amplitude between the first and second harmonics (H1-H2) in laryngealized and non-laryngealized vowels showed that H1-H2 values were not influenced by vowel laryngealization categories, but were influenced the presence of a glottal stop following the vowel. This finding suggests that the laryngealization contrast neutralizes in vowels before glottal stops. In order to consider the potentially glottalic nature of ejective fricatives in UNT, Chapter 5 compared durations of phonetic events that occur during fricative production, including oral closure and frication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phonetics of Voice1 Marc Garellek, University of California San Diego Chapter in the Routledge Handbook of Phonetics (W
    The phonetics of voice1 Marc Garellek, University of California San Diego Chapter in The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics (W. Katz and P. Assmann, editors) Revised 14th June 2018 1 Introduction This chapter focuses on the phonetics of the voice. The term ‘voice’ is used to mean many different things, with definitions varying both within and across researchers and disciplines. In terms of voice articulation, definitions can vary from the very narrow – how the vocal folds vibrate – to the very broad, where ‘voice’ is essentially synonymous with ‘speech’ – how the vocal folds and all other vocal tract articulators influence how we sound (Kreiman and Sidtis, 2011). In this chapter, I will use the term ‘voice’ to refer to sound produced by the vocal folds, including but not limited to vocal fold vibration. I have chosen to focus only on a narrow conception of the voice in order to constrain the discussion; as we will see, the phonetics of voice – even when it concerns only vocal fold articulation – is remarkably complex and of great relevance to phonetic and linguistic research. In contrast, I will use the term ‘voice quality’ to refer to the percept resulting from the voice: in other words, different vocal fold configurations have specific perceptual ramifications, which we will call changes in voice quality. The distinction between voice and voice quality adopted here is therefore analogous to that made between ‘fundamental frequency (f0)’ and ‘pitch’. Why should we be interested in the phonetics of the voice? Linguists are interested in how specific forms contribute to linguistic meaning; for spoken languages, phonetic and phonological research addresses this goal from the point of view of how sounds contribute to meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Voicing of Glottal Consonants and Non-Modal Vowels
    [Preprint of paper accepted for publication in Journal of the International Phonetic Association] VOICING OF GLOTTAL CONSONANTS AND NON-MODAL VOWELS Marc Garellek, Yuan Chai, Yaqian Huang, and Maxine Van Doren UC San Diego [email protected] ABSTRACT Variation in voicing is common among sounds of the world’s languages: sounds that are analyzed as voiceless can undergo voicing, and those analyzed as voiced can devoice. Among voiceless glottal sounds in particular, voicing is widespread: linguists often expect the voiceless glottal stop [ʔ] and fricative [h] to be fully voiced, especially between vowels. In this study, we use audio recordings from Illustrations of the International Phonetic Alphabet to explore the extent to which glottal consonants and non-modal (breathy and creaky) vowels differ in terms of percentage voicing and voicing intensity in three phrasal positions. We find that voiceless [h] is only slightly less voiced than voiced [ɦ] in initial position. Between two vowels, both [h] and [ɦ] are as voiced as breathy vowels. Glottal stops and creaky vowels are both characterized by high percentages of voicing, but they differ in voicing intensity: in all phrasal positions, glottal stops generally have periods of strong and weak voicing, whereas creaky vowels are strongly voiced. In contrast, vowels described as ‘rearticulated,’ ‘checked,’ or ‘glottalized’ show similar drops in voicing intensity to glottal stops. We interpret these results through an articulatory lens: glottal consonants and non-modal vowels are both modulations in phonation resulting from laryngeal constriction and vocal fold spreading. We argue further that, because voicing during [ʔ] and [h] is largely predictable from respiratory and prosodic constraints, many cases of [ʔ] and [h] can be considered to be phonetically underspecified for voicing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Continental Workshop on Phonology 11
    Mid-Continental Workshop on Phonology 11 University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI November 4 – 6, 2005 Abstract Booklet Lexical Tone Perception in Musicians and Non-musicians Jennifer A. Alexander(1), Patrick C.M. Wong(2, 3), and Ann R. Bradlow(1) 1: Northwestern University Department of Linguistics, 2: Northwestern University Institute for Neuroscience, 3: Northwestern University Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders It has been suggested that music and speech maintain entirely dissociable mental processing systems. The current study, however, provides evidence that there is an overlap in the processing of certain shared aspects of the two. This study focuses on fundamental frequency (pitch), which is an essential component of melodic units in music and lexical and/or intonational units in speech. We hypothesize that extensive experience with the processing of musical pitch can transfer to a lexical pitch-processing domain. To that end, we asked nine English-speaking musicians and nine English-speaking non-musicians to identify and discriminate the four lexical tones of Mandarin Chinese. The subjects performed significantly differently on both tasks; the musicians identified the tones with 89% accuracy and discriminated them with 87% accuracy, while the non-musicians identified them with only 69% accuracy and discriminated them with 71% accuracy. These results provide counter-evidence to the theory of dissociation between music and speech processing. Changes in the distribution of glottal stops in K’ichean languages Rusty Barrett Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago This paper uses Optimality Theory to analyze diachronic changes involving glottal stops in K’ichean (Mayan) languages. Proto-Mayan *CV1?V2C roots have a variety of modern correspondents including CV1C, CV1?C, CV2?C, C?V1C, and CV1?V2C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Music in Plain Speech and Writing
    The Music in Plain Speech and Writing PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sun, 19 May 2013 11:51:46 UTC Contents CMU Pronouncing Dictionary 1 Arpabet 2 International Phonetic Alphabet 5 Phonetic transcription 26 Phonemic orthography 30 Pronunciation 35 Syllable 36 Allophone 46 Homophone 49 Rhyme 52 Half rhyme 59 Internal rhyme 60 Assonance 62 Literary consonance 64 Alliteration 65 Mnemonic 68 Phonetic algorithm 73 Metaphone 74 Soundex 77 Rhyme Genie 79 References Article Sources and Contributors 81 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 84 Article Licenses License 85 CMU Pronouncing Dictionary 1 CMU Pronouncing Dictionary CMU Pronouncing Dictionary Developer(s) Carnegie Mellon University Stable release 0.7a / February 18, 2008 Development status Maintained Available in English License Public Domain [1] Website Homepage The CMU Pronouncing Dictionary (also known as cmudict) is a public domain pronouncing dictionary created by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU). It defines a mapping from English words to their North American pronunciations, and is commonly used in speech processing applications such as the Festival Speech Synthesis System and the CMU Sphinx speech recognition system. The latest release is 0.7a, which contains 133,746 entries (from 123,442 baseforms). Database Format The database is distributed as a text file of the format word <two spaces> pronunciation. If there are multiple pronunciations available for a word, all subsequent entries are followed by an index in parentheses. The pronunciation is encoded using a modified form of the Arpabet system. The difference is stress marks on vowels with levels 0, 1, 2; not all entries have stress however.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Morphosyntactic Typology of Ideophones, with Special Reference to Japanese1 MARK DINGEMANSE Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
    J. Linguistics 53 (2017), 501–532. c Cambridge University Press 2016 doi:10.1017/S002222671600030X First published online 4 October 2016 An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese1 MARK DINGEMANSE Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics KIMI AKITA Nagoya University (Received 17 July 2015; revised 15 August 2016) Words and phrases may differ in the extent to which they are susceptible to prosodic foregrounding and expressive morphology: their expressiveness. They may also differ in the degree to which they are integrated in the morphosyntactic structure of the utterance: their grammatical integration. We describe an inverse relation that holds across widely varied languages, such that more expressiveness goes together with less grammatical integration, and vice versa. We review typological evidence for this inverse relation in ten spoken languages, then quantify and explain it using Japanese corpus data. We do this by tracking ideophones – vivid sensory words also known as mimetics or expressives – across different morphosyntactic contexts and measuring their expressiveness in terms of intonation, phonation and expressive morphology. We find that as expressiveness increases, grammatical integration decreases. Using gesture as a measure independent of the speech signal, we find that the most expressive ideophones are most likely to come together with iconic gestures. We argue that the ultimate cause is the encounter of two distinct and partly incommensurable modes of representation: the gradient, iconic, depictive system represented by ideophones and iconic gestures, and the discrete, arbitrary, descriptive system represented by ordinary words. The study shows how people combine modes of representation in speech and demonstrates the value of integrating description and depiction into the scientific vision of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Representational Implications of the Phonologization of Contour Tones
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Representational Implications of the Phonologization of Contour Tones Benjamin Kirkland Macaulay Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/362 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] REPRESENTATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PHONOLOGIZATION OF CONTOUR TONES by BENJAMIN K. MACAULAY A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 Benjamin K. Macaulay All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Linguistics in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Juliette Blevins x _ x _ x Date Thesis Advisor Gita Martohardjono x _ x _ x Date Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract REPRESENTATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PHONOLOGIZATION OF CONTOUR TONES by Benjamin K. Macaulay Advisor: Professor Juliette Blevins This thesis bridges accounts of tonogenesis to representations of contour tones in the dominant framework, autosegmental phonology. Accounts of tonogenesis reference phonetic features and structures that are unable to be represented in autosegmental phonology. As these features are required for the phonologization of contour tones, it is argued that they must also receive some representation in the synchrony.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Linguistic Phonetic Structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What
    Representing linguistic phonetic structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Kinds of information conveyed by speech Sociolinguistic differences are not the same as linguistic differences What counts as a linguistic contrast 1.2 Non-linguistic aspects of speech\ Speaker attitudes, style, peronal identity Spoken language and written language The role of intonation 1.3 Universal phonetics and phonology Equating sounds in different languages IPA categories and phonological feaures Innate features The number of possible contrasting sounds 1.4 Language as a social institution The mental nature of language Language as a self-organizing social institution Filling holes in patterns Phonemes as linguistic constructs 2. What is the purpose of a linguistic phonetic representation 2.1 The nature of phonological features Describing sound patterns vs. specifying the lexicon How sound patterns arise 2.2 The need for auditory/acoustic features Auditory characteristics of vowels Other auditory features 2.3 Defining characteristics of features Features are defined in terms of acoustic or articulatory scales Articulatory features do not have invariant acoustic correlates 2.4 Multi-valued features. Features with an ordered set of values »pit´ »lQdIf´UgId rEprI»sEntIN »lINgwIstIk f´»nEtIk »str√ktS´ 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Before we discuss the phonetic representation of a language, we must consider what it is we want to represent, and why we want to represent it. Phonetics is the study of the sounds of speech, so it is these sounds that we want to represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices on Voice: Perspectives, Definitions, Inquiry
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 375 404 CS 214 544 AUTHOR Yancey, Kathleen Blake, Ed. TITLE Voices on Voice: Perspectives, Definitions, Inquiry. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-5634-7 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 387p. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 56347-3050: $22.95 members, $29.95 nonmembers). PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) Guides Non- Classroom Use (055) Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC16 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Cultural Context; Deafness; Higher Education; Literary Devices; Oral Tradition; Personal Narratives; *Rhetoric; *Self Expression; Undergraduate Students; *Writing (Composition) IDENTIFIERS *Author Text Relationship; Personal Writing; Rhetorical Stance; *Voice (Rhetoric) ABSTRACT This collection of essays approaches "voice" as a means of expression that lives in the interactions of writers, readers, and language, and examines the conceptualizations of voice within the oral rhetorical and expressionist traditions, and the notion of voice as both a singular and plural phenomenon. An explanatory introduction by the editor is followed by 19 essays:(1) "What Do We Mean When We Talk about Voice in Texts?" (Peter Elbow); (2) "Claiming My Voice" (Toby Fulwiler); (3) "Coming to Voice" (Gail Summerskill Cummins); (4) "Affect and Effect in Voice" (Doug Minnerly);.(5) "Technical Texts/Personal Voice: Intersections and Crossed Purposes" (Nancy Allen and Deborah S. Bosley);(6) "Voices in the News" (Meg Morgan);(7) The Chameleon 'I': On Voice and Personality in the Personal Essay" (Carl H. Klaus);(8) "The Difference It Makes to Speak: The Voice of Authority in Joan Didion" (Laura Julier);(9) "Teaching Voice" (Margaret K.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetics the Science of Speech
    Phonetics This page intentionally left blank Phonetics The Science of Speech Martin J. Ball School of Psychology and Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown and Joan Rahilly School of English, The Queen's University of Belfast First published in Great Britain in 1999 by Arnold, a member of the Hodder Headline Group, Published in 2013 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 ThirdAvenue,New YorkNY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 1999 Martin J. Ball and Joan Rahilly All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without either prior permission in writing from the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying. In the Uni ted Kingdom such licences are issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency: 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE. The advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, but neither the authors nor the publisher can accept any legal reponsibility or li ability for any errors or omissions. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 978-0-340-70009-9 (hbk) ISBN 978-0-340-70010-5 (pbk) Production Editor:
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Studies of Voice Variation JYV ASKYLA STUDIES in COMMUNICATION 7
    Acoustic Studies of Voice Variation JYV ASKYLA STUDIES IN COMMUNICATION 7 Pertti Hurme Acoustic Studies of Voice Variation UNIVERSITY OF � JYV ASKYLA JYVAsKYLA 1996 Editor Raimo Salokangas Department of Communication, University of Jyvaskyla Technical editor Kaarina Nieminen Scientific Publishing, University of Jyvaskyla URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8089-4 ISBN 978-951-39-8089-4 (PDF) ISSN 1238-2183 ISBN 951-34-0860-4 ISSN 1238-2183 Copyright© 1996, by University of Jyvaskyla Cover Jorma Luotio Kopi-Jyva Oy and Sisasuomi Oy, Jyvaskyla 1996 ABSTRACT Hurme, Pertti Acoustic Studies of Voice Variation Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla, 1996, 148 p. (Studies in Communication, ISSN 1238-2183; 7) ISBN 951-34-0860-4 Finnish summary Diss. The present study deals with variation in the human voice. The functions of the voice are addressed and the major practical and theoretical approaches to the voice introduced. A three-fold approach is taken involving phonetics, logopedics and phoniatrics, and singing pedagogy. Voice research is de­ scribed from three perspectives: voice production, acoustics and perception. A central concept is the adduction-abduction continuum, to which various descriptive categories of voice (e.g. creaky and breathy) are related. The study aims at describing the spectral properties of dysphonic voices, of voices varying in vocal intensity, and of supported and covered singing voices. The study also aims at relating the spectral observations to voice production, especially to the adduction-abduction continuum. In addition, the instrumental method used, long-term average spectrum (LTAS) analysis, is evaluated. Four sets of materials were investigated by means of LT AS analysis. Two were spoken materials: dysphonic voices (n = 87) and voices varying in vocal intensity (n = 10); two were sung materials: supported and unsupported voices (n = 8) and coverered and open voices (n = 1).
    [Show full text]