Lisdexamfetamine for ADHD Timothy E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lisdexamfetamine for ADHD Timothy E Out of the Pipeline Lisdexamfetamine for ADHD Timothy E. Wilens, MD isdexamfetamine—FDA-approved Table 1 Extended-action to treat attention-defi cit/hyperactiv- Lisdexamfetamine: Fast facts psychostimulant ity disorder (ADHD) in children ages L Brand name: Vyvanse off ers daylong 6 to 12 (Table 1)—reduces ADHD symp- coverage and has toms during and after school and may be Indication: ADHD in children ages 6 to 12 comparatively low less likely to be abused than other psycho- Approval date: February 23, 2007 abuse potential stimulants, particularly immediate-release Manufacturers: New River Pharmaceuticals preparations, clinical data suggest. and Shire Dosing forms: 30-, 50-, and 70-mg capsules Clinical implications Recommended dosage: Start at 30 mg/d. ® Dowden HealthIf necessary, Media titrate by 20 mg every 3 to 7 Because it is effective for about 12 hours, days to a maximum 70 mg/d. lisdexamfetamine might improve the child’s abilityCopyright to completeFor homework personal and partici- use only pate in extracurricular activities, which in Lisdexamfetamine requires in vivo turn might enhance academic performance metabolism (in the GI tract) to its active and/or socialization skills. constituent d-amphetamine. As a result, Lisdexamfetamine could help the child the medication will not produce high d- with ADHD who shows no contraindica- amphetamine blood levels—and should tions to the drug (page 105)—particularly if not cause euphoria or other reinforcing he or she needs daylong coverage. effects—if injected or snorted. Its abuse potential is lower overall compared with immediate-release psychostimulant How it works formulations. Lisdexamfetamine—a dextroamphetamine derivative—is rapidly absorbed and con- verted to dextroamphetamine, which is Pharmacokinetics believed to exert therapeutic effect by: Dextroamphetamine’s plasma elimination 1 • blocking norepinephrine and dopamine half-life is approximately 9 ⁄2 hours—which reuptake into presynaptic neurons accounts for lisdexamfetamine’s extended • increasing the neurotransmitters’ re- action. The drug reaches steady-state con- lease into the extraneuronal space. centrations in 2 to 3 days. The medication’s amphetamine release Food does not affect absorption and is highly predictable, which contributes to delays maximum concentration by 1 hour its therapeutic benefi t in ADHD. Amphet- or less, so taking lisdexamfetamine dur- amine is released through GI metabolism ing breakfast should not slow its thera- of lisdexamfetamine, which produces the peutic effect. Because dextroamphet- active d-amphetamine moiety that reaches the bloodstream. The medication is de- Dr. Wilens is associate professor of psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and director, substance abuse services, rived from d-amphetamine, with negligi- Current Psychiatry Clinical and Research Program in Pediatric Pharmacology, 96 June 2007 ble amounts of lysine cleaved. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. For mass reproduction, content licensing and permissions contact Dowden Health Media. Out of the Pipeline amine reaches maximum concentration in children were started at 30 mg/d; some 1 approximately 3 ⁄2 hours, the medication received dosages titrated at random to 50 should take effect by the time the child or 70 mg/d in weekly 20-mg increments. gets to school. In one randomized, phase- Over 4 weeks, ADHD Rating Scale Ver- 2 trial, children with ADHD who received sion IV (ADHD-RS-IV) scores fell 50% to lisdexamfetamine, 30 to 70 mg/d, showed 59% among the 3 lisdexamfetamine dos- overall improvement within 2 hours after age groups, compared with a 15% reduc- dosing.1 tion in the placebo group. Substantial ADHD-RS-IV score improvements after 1 week of lisdexamfetamine were main- Effi cacy tained throughout the trial, suggesting Lisdexamfetamine reduced ADHD symp- the medication sustains ADHD symp- toms in 2 double-blind studies: a phase-2 tom improvement. Controlled trials have crossover study and a phase-3 random- not addressed lisdexamfetamine use >4 dose trial. weeks, however. Clinical Point Phase-2 crossover study.2 Fifty-two Based on parents’ and guardians’ re- IInn oonene sstudy,tudy, children ages 6 to 12 with combined or ports, treatment-group patients’ ADHD cchildrenhildren wwithith hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD re- symptoms were notably less severe at AADHDDHD sshowedhowed ceived extended-release mixed amphet- 10 am, 2 pm, and 6 pm compared with amine salts (MAS) for 3 weeks. Subjects re- placebo-group children.3 This suggests iimprovementmprovement ceived 10 mg/d or dosages titrated to 20 or that lisdexamfetamine offers a daylong wwithinithin 2 hhoursours 30 mg/d based on response to medication. therapeutic effect. aafterfter rreceivingeceiving The youths then were divided into 3 llisdexamfetamineisdexamfetamine groups based on optimal MAS dosage and received 3 treatments for 1 week each: Tolerability • group 1: placebo; MAS, 10 mg/d; In the phase-3 study,3 162 of 218 (74%) lisdexamfetamine, 30 mg/d children receiving any dosage of lisdex- • group 2: placebo; MAS, 20 mg/d; amfetamine reported an adverse event, lisdexamfetamine, 50 mg/d compared with 34 of 72 (47%) children • group 3: placebo; MAS, 30 mg/d; in the placebo group. Overall, 39% of lis- lisdexamfetamine, 70 mg/d. dexamfetamine-group patients reported While taking lisdexamfetamine or MAS, decreased appetite. Also common were subjects showed similar improvement insomnia, headaches, irritability, upper in behavior, based on Swanson, Kotkin, abdominal pain, vomiting, and weight Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) loss (Table 2, page 98). scores, and inattention, based on SKAMP Although most adverse events were and Permanent Product Measure of Per- mild to moderate, 9.2% of treatment-group formance scores. children dropped out because of intoler- Both psychostimulants outperformed ability, compared with 1.4% of the placebo placebo in both measures, and both im- group. The investigators increased dosages proved behavior more decisively than quickly, regardless of effi cacy or tolerabili- inattention. Based on post-hoc analysis, ty,3 which might have increased side-effect improvement 12 hours after dosing was incidence among the treatment groups. more substantial with lisdexamfetamine than with MAS. Phase-3 random-dose trial.3 A total of Read about other new 290 children ages 6 to 12 with combined or drugs and innovations at hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD were CurrentPsychiatry.com “washed out” from prior medications over u Click on ‘Browse Back Issues’ 1 week, then received lisdexamfetamine u Then click on ‘Out of the Pipeline’ under Current Psychiatry or placebo for 4 weeks. Treatment-group ‘Browse by Category’ Vol. 6, No. 6 97 continued Out of the Pipeline Table 2 Rates of commonly reported adverse eff ects during phase-3 lisdexamfetamine (LDX) study Adverse LDX LDX LDX LDX effect 30 mg/d 50 mg/d* 70 mg/d* all dosages Placebo All adverse 72% 68% 84% 74% 47% effects Decreased 37% 31% 49% 39% 4% appetite Insomnia 16% 16% 25% 19% 3% Upper 14% 7% 15% 12% 6% abdominal pain Headache 10% 10% 16% 12% 10% Clinical Point Irritability 11% 8% 10% 10% 0% ADHD Rating Scale Vomiting 7% 5% 14% 9% 4% score decreases Weight loss 6% 3% 19% 9% 1% after 1 and 4 *Dosages were randomly titrated regardless of effi cacy or tolerability. weeks suggest that Source: Reference 3 lisdexamfetamine sustains symptom In the phase-2 crossover trial,2 adverse Abuse potential improvement event rates were similar among the lis- As with other psychostimulants indicated dexamfetamine, extended-release MAS, for ADHD, the Drug Enforcement Admin- and placebo groups (15% to 18%). Among istration has classifi ed lisdexamfetamine youths receiving lisdexamfetamine, 8% as a schedule II drug, which applies to ad- reported insomnia and 6% reported appe- dictive prescription-only medications with tite loss, compared with 2% and 4% of the an accepted medical use. MAS group, respectively. Clinical data suggest, however, that lisdexamfetamine might be less “enjoy- able”—and less likely to be abused in- Safety travenously, orally, or intranasally—than Findling et al4 found a larger change in equipotent d-amphetamine. In an abuse corrected QT interval with lisdexamfet- liability study,6 12 adults with histories of amine (7 to 14 msec) than with extended- stimulant abuse received intravenous im- 1 release MAS (5 to 10 msec) 5 and 10 ⁄2 mediate-release (IR) d-amphetamine, 10 hours after dosing. The authors reasoned or 20 mg. Two days later, they received a that these fi ndings are atypical, and no comparable dose of IV lisdexamfetamine, children suffered serious adverse events 25 or 50 mg. The researchers found that: during the trial. Nonetheless, more re- • Plasma d-amphetamine peaked with- search on whether lisdexamfetamine in- in 5 minutes after injection, compared creases cardiac risk is needed. with 2 to 3 hours after lisdexamfetamine In a lethal-dose study in rats,5 oral lis- dosing. dexamfetamine doses up to 1,000 mg/kg • Subjects who received IR d-amphet- did not result in death, suggesting the amine said they felt euphoria within 15 min- medication might undergo saturation utes of injection. By contrast, no one report- kinetics in the GI tract that may protect ed euphoria or amphetamine-like subjective against overdose or abuse at higher dosag- effects after receiving lisdexamfetamine. es. By comparison, the median lethal oral When asked which medication they would dosage of d-amphetamine in rats was 96.8 try again, 9 of 12 subjects chose IR d-amphet- Current Psychiatry 98 June 2007 mg/kg.5 amine and 1 chose lisdexamfetamine. continued on page 105 Out of the Pipeline continued from page 98 In a double-blind, randomized, placebo- Related Resource 7 controlled study, oral lisdexamfetamine, • Lisdexamfetamine Web site. www.vyvanse.com. 50 or 100 mg, was not more “likeable” Drug Brand Names than placebo. Subjects reported “liking” Extended-release mixed amphetamine salts • Adderall XR effects with 150 mg of lisdexamfetamine, Lisdexamfetamine • Vyvanse however, suggesting the medication could Disclosure be misused or abused at higher-than- Dr. Wilens receives research/grant support from Abbott therapeutic dosages.
Recommended publications
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a Double-Blind, Crossover Trial
    Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Double-blind, Crossover Trial Daryl Efron, FRACP; Frederick Jarman, FRACP; and Melinda Barker, Grad Dip Ed Psych ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare methylphenidate behavioral, academic, and social functioning. Many (MPH) and dexamphetamine (DEX) in a sample of chil- well-designed, placebo-controlled studies have dem- dren with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder onstrated beyond doubt the benefits of stimulants in (ADHD). the vast majority of children with ADHD.2–4 In a Method. A total of 125 children with ADHD received review of 110 studies on the effects of stimulant both MPH (0.3 mg/kg twice daily) and DEX (0.15 mg/kg drugs on more than 4200 children with ADHD, twice daily) for 2 weeks a double-blind, crossover study. 4 ; Outcome measures were Conners’ Parent Rating Scale– Barkley found that 75% of subjects were regarded Revised, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale–Revised, a Par- as improved on stimulants. The mean placebo re- ent Global Perceptions questionnaire, the Continuous sponse was 39%. Performance Test, and the Barkley Side Effects Rating Methylphenidate (MPH) and dexamphetamine Scale. (DEX) are the two stimulants prescribed most fre- Results. There were significant group mean im- quently and have been shown to have similar types provements from baseline score on all measures for of positive effects in children with ADHD. However, both stimulants. On the Conners’ Teacher Rating Scal- it is not known whether one is more efficacious than e–Revised, response was greater on MPH than DEX on the other in terms of probability of producing a the conduct problems and hyperactivity factors, as well positive response, magnitude of response, quality of as on the hyperactivity index.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine IR Generic
    GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE STIMULANT AND RELATED AGENTS PA SUMMARY Preferred Non-Preferred Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine IR generic Adzenys ER (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Armodafinil generic Adzenys XR (amphetamine ER dispersible tab) Atomoxetine generic Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER (generic Concerta (methylphenidate ER/SA) Adderall XR) Dextroamphetamine IR tablets generic Aptensio XR (methylphenidate ER) Focalin (dexmethylphenidate) Clonidine ER generic Focalin XR (dexmethylphenidate ER) Cotempla XR (methylphenidate ER disintegrating Guanfacine ER generic tablet) Methylin oral solution (methylphenidate) Daytrana (methylphenidate TD patch) Methylphenidate CD/CR/ER generic by Lannett Desoxyn (methamphetamine) [NDCs 00527-####-##] and Kremers Urban [NDCs Dexmethylphenidate IR generic 62175-####-##] (generic Metadate CD) Dexmethylphenidate ER generic Methylphenidate IR generic Dextroamphetamine ER capsules generic Modafinil generic Dextroamphetamine oral solution generic Quillichew ER (methylphenidate ER chew tabs) Dyanavel XR (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Quillivant XR (methylphenidate ER oral suspension) Evekeo (amphetamine tablets) Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine) Methamphetamine generic Zenzedi 5 mg, 10 mg IR tablets (dextroamphetamine) Methylphenidate IR chewable tablets generic Methylphenidate ER/SA (generic Concerta) Methylphenidate ER/LA/SR (generic Ritalin LA, Ritalin SR, Metadate ER) Methylphenidate ER/SA 72 mg generic Methylphenidate oral solution generic Mydayis (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER) Ritalin LA 10 mg
    [Show full text]
  • (Adhd) Quantity Limitation Utilization Management Criteria
    ATTENTION- DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD) QUANTITY LIMITATION UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA DRUG CLASS: Stimulants and Non-Stimulants BRAND (generic) NAMES: Adderall® (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) Adderall XR® (amphetamine/ dextroamphetamine ER) Adzenys XR-ODTTM (amphetamine ER dispersible) Aptensio XR® (methylphenidate ER) Concerta® (methylphenidate ER) Daytrana® (methylphenidate transdermal patch) Dextroampthetamine (DextroStat®) Dexedrine® (dextroamphetamine ER) DyanavelTM XR (amphetamine ER) Focalin XR® (dexmethylphenidate ER) Focalin® (dexmethylphenidate) Intuniv® (guanfacine ER) Kapvay® (clonidine ER) Metadate CD® (methylphenidate ER) Metadate ER® (methylphenidate ER) Methylin® (methylphenidate) Procentra® (dextroamphetamine) QuillichewTM (methylphenidate ER) Quillivant XR® (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® (methylphenidate) Ritalin® LA (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® SR (methylphenidate ER) Strattera® (atomoxetine) Vyvanse® (lisdexamphetamine) Zenzedi® (dextroamphetamine) COVERAGE AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA Non-formulary medications - Medications included in this criterion that are not part of ASO Net Results or Essential Formularies are subject to a trial and failure of up to TWO formulary alternatives that are clinically appropriate, to treat the same condition, prior to approval (see Non-formulary Exception Criteria for detailed limitations). Quantities above the program set limit (see pgs 2-4) for ADHD agents will be approved when the following is met: 1. The quantity (dose) requested is for documented titration purposes at the initiation of therapy (authorization for a 90 day titration period); AND 2. The prescribed dose cannot be achieved using a lesser quantity of a higher strength; AND 3. The quantity (dose) requested does not exceed the maximum FDA labeled dose, when specified, or to the safest studied dose per the manufacturer’s product insert; OR BLUE CROSS®, BLUE SHIELD® and the Cross and Shield Symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulant and Related Medications: US Food and Drug
    Stimulant and Related Medications: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults The therapeutic dosing recommendations for stimulant and related medications are based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling. Nevertheless, the dosing regimen is adjusted according to a patient’s individual response to pharmacotherapy. The FDA-approved dosages and indications for the use of stimulant and related medications in adults are provided in this table. All medication doses listed are for oral administration. Information on the generic availability of the stimulant and related medications can be found by searching the Electronic Orange Book at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm on the FDA website. Generic Medication Indication Dosing Information Other Information Availability amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Initial dose: May increase daily dose by 5 mg at Yes mixed salts[1] 5 mg once or twice a day; weekly intervals until optimal response Maximum dose: 40 mg per day is achieved. Only in rare cases will it be necessary to exceed a total of 40 mg per day. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine narcolepsy Initial dose: 10 mg per day; May increase daily dose by 10 mg at Yes mixed salts Usual dose: weekly intervals until optimal response 5 mg to 60 mg per day is achieved. Take first dose in divided doses upon awakening. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Recommended dose: Patients switching from regular-release Yes mixed salts ER*[2] 20 mg once a day amphetamine/dextroamphetamine mixed salts may take the same total daily dose once a day. armodafinil[3] narcolepsy Recommended dose: Take as a single dose in the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Meds
    CARING FOR CHILDREN WITH ADHD: A RESOURCE TOOLKIT FOR CLINICIANS, 2ND EDITION Basic Facts: What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Medication Studies have shown that treatment for attention-deficit/ • If you reach the maximum recommended dose without • hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with medication is effective in noticeable improvement in symptoms, try a different stimulant treating the symptoms of ADHD alone or in combination with medication class. Approximately 80% of children will respond to behavioral interventions. at least 1 of the 2 stimulant classes tried. • Stimulant medications also improve academic productivity but • When changing medications, be careful about the dose not cognitive abilities or academic skills. equivalence of different stimulant medication classes; in general, equivalent doses for dexmethylphenidate and Stimulants can help reduce oppositional, aggressive, impulsive, • amphetamine-based stimulants are approximately half of a and delinquent behaviors in some children. methylphenidate dose. Several types of medications are Food and Drug Administration Non-stimulant medications may require 2 or more weeks to see • (FDA)-approved for the treatment of ADHD. • effects, so you should titrate up more slowly than you would • Stimulant medications: methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, for stimulant medications. Obtaining follow-up rating scales is dextroamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, even more important than for stimulant medications because lisdexamfetamine changes are more gradual. • Non-stimulant medications: atomoxetine, and extended-release • Managing side effects effectively can improve adherence to and guanfacine and clonidine satisfaction with stimulant medications. When choosing which stimulant and dose to start first, consider • Common side effects to discuss with families include • stomachache, headache, decreased appetite, sleep problems, Family preference and experience with the medication, including • and behavioral rebound.
    [Show full text]
  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Dexamphetamine Maintenance for the Treatment of Methamphetamine
    RESEARCH REPORT doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02717.x Randomized controlled trial of dexamphetamine maintenance for the treatment of methamphetamine dependenceadd_2717 146..154 Marie Longo1, Wendy Wickes1, Matthew Smout1, Sonia Harrison1, Sharon Cahill1 & Jason M. White1,2 Pharmacotherapies Research Unit, Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia, Norwood, South Australia, Australia1 and Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia2 ABSTRACT Aim To investigate the safety and efficacy of once-daily supervised oral administration of sustained-release dexam- phetamine in people dependent on methamphetamine. Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants Forty-nine methamphetamine-dependent drug users from Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia (DASSA) clinics. Intervention Participants were assigned randomly to receive up to 110 mg/day sustained- release dexamphetamine (n = 23) or placebo (n = 26) for a maximum of 12 weeks, with gradual reduction of the study medication over an additional 4 weeks. Medication was taken daily under pharmacist supervision. Measurements Primary outcome measures included treatment retention, measures of methamphetamine consump- tion (self-report and hair analysis), degree of methamphetamine dependence and severity of methamphetamine withdrawal. Hair samples were analysed for methamphetamine using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Findings Treatment retention was significantly different between groups, with those who received dexamphetamine remaining in treatment for an average of 86.3 days compared with 48.6 days for those receiving placebo (P = 0.014). There were significant reductions in self-reported methamphetamine use between baseline and follow-up within each group (P < 0.0001), with a trend to a greater reduction among the dexamphetamine group (P = 0.086).
    [Show full text]
  • Established Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II
    59980 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE for Schedule I and II Controlled information, DEA has determined that Substances and Proposed Assessment of adjustments to the proposed aggregate Drug Enforcement Administration Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals production quotas and assessment of [Docket No. DEA–365] Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and annual needs for 3,4-methylenedioxy-N- Phenylpropanolamine for 2013,’’ was methylcathinone (methylone), Established Aggregate Production published in the Federal Register (77 3,4,methylenedioxypyrovalerone Quotas for Schedule I and II Controlled FR 46519). That notice proposed the (MDPV), 4-methyl-N-methylcathinone Substances and Established 2013 aggregate production quotas for (mephedrone), N-benzylpiperazine, Assessment of Annual Needs for the each basic class of controlled substance amphetamine (for conversion), List I Chemicals Ephedrine, listed in schedules I and II and the 2013 amphetamine (for sale), hydrocodone Pseudoephedrine, and assessment of annual needs for the list (for sale), hydromorphone, Phenylpropanolamine for 2013 I chemicals ephedrine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, pseudoephedrine, and morphine (for sale), oxycodone (for AGENCY: Drug Enforcement phenylpropanolamine. All interested sale), oxymorphone (for conversion), Administration (DEA), Department of persons were invited to comment on or remifentanil, sufentanil, tapentadol, Justice. object to the proposed aggregate ephedrine (for conversion), ephedrine ACTION:
    [Show full text]
  • A Dose-Escalating, Phase-2 Study of Oral Lisdexamfetamine
    Ezard et al. BMC Psychiatry (2016) 16:428 DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1141-x STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Study protocol: a dose-escalating, phase-2 study of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence Nadine Ezard1,2, Adrian Dunlop3, Brendan Clifford1* , Raimondo Bruno4, Andrew Carr5, Alexandra Bissaker1 and Nicholas Lintzeris6,7 Abstract Background: The treatment of methamphetamine dependence is a continuing global health problem. Agonist type pharmacotherapies have been used successfully to treat opioid and nicotine dependence and are being studied for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. One potential candidate is lisdexamfetamine, a pro-drug for dexamphetamine, which has a longer lasting therapeutic action with a lowered abuse potential. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of lisdexamfetamine in this population at doses higher than those currently approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or binge eating disorder. Methods/design: This is a phase 2 dose escalation study of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Twenty individuals seeking treatment for methamphetamine dependence will be recruited at two Australian drug and alcohol services. All participants will undergo a single-blinded ascending-descending dose regime of 100 to 250 mg lisdexamfetamine, dispensed daily on site, over an 8-week period. Participants will be offered counselling as standard care. For the primary objectives the outcome variables will be adverse events monitoring, drug tolerability and regimen completion. Secondary outcomes will be changes in methamphetamine use, craving, withdrawal, severity of dependence, risk behaviour and other substance use. Medication acceptability, potential for non-prescription use, adherence and changes in neurocognition will also be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH VYVANSE®* lisdexamfetamine dimesylate Capsules: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg and 70 mg Chewable Tablets: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg and 60 mg Central Nervous System Stimulant Takeda Canada Inc. Date of Preparation: 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3800 19 February 2009 Toronto, Ontario M5H 4E3 Date of Revision: July 21, 2020 Submission Control No.: 240669 *VYVANSE® and the VYVANSE Logo are registered trademarks of Shire LLC, a Takeda company. Takeda and the Takeda Logo are trademarks of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, used under license. © 2020 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. All rights reserved. Pa ge 1 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .................................................... 3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ........................................................................ 3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ............................................................................................ 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ............................................................................ 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS........................................................................................... 12 DRUG INTERACTIONS ........................................................................................... 23 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 25 OVERDOSAGE .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphetamine Use Among Workers with Severe Hyperthermia
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Notes from the Field Amphetamine Use Among Workers with Severe National Weather Service observation stations, the maximum Hyperthermia — Eight States, 2010–2019 outdoor heat index (a metric that combines temperature and Andrew S. Karasick, MD1,2; Richard J. Thomas, MD1; relative humidity into a single number that represents how hot Dawn L. Cannon, MD1; Kathleen M. Fagan, MD1; Patricia A. Bray, MD1; the conditions feel to humans) ranged from 86°F to 107°F 1 1 Michael J. Hodgson, MD ; Aaron W. Tustin, MD (median = 97°F) on the days of the nine incidents. Seven of the nine workers died, and two survived life-threat- Workers can develop hyperthermia when core body tem- ening illnesses. Peak body temperature ranged from 103°F to perature rises because of heat stress (environmental heat plus 110.6°F (39.4°C to 43.7°C) in eight workers with confirmed metabolic heat from physical activity) (1). Amphetamines are severe hyperthermia. In one fatality with no premortem body central nervous system stimulants that can induce hyperthermia temperature measurement, the medical examiner suspected independently or in combination with other risk factors (2). that hyperthermia was a significant contributing condition, During 2010–2016, the Directorate of Technical Support and based upon the circumstances (i.e., death occurred in a hot Emergency Management’s Office of Occupational Medicine environment after strenuous activity on a hot day) and lack and Nursing (OOMN), at the Occupational Safety and Health of anatomic evidence of an alternative cause of death (e.g., Administration (OSHA), identified three workers with fatal myocardial infarction).
    [Show full text]