DOCSLIB.ORG

Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned Author(s): Dana Hunt, Ph.D.; Sarah Kuck; Linda Truitt, Ph.D. Document No.: 209730 Date Received: February 2006 Award Number: 99-C-008 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ANALYTIC SUPPORT PROGRAM CONTRACT TASK REQUIREMENT T-043: Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned Contract No. 99-C-008 Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Chicago, IL January 31, 2006 Prepared for Raymond C. German Contracting Officer Christine Crossland Senior Social Science Analyst National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs Acquisition Management Division 810 Seventh Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20001 Prepared by Dana Hunt, Ph.D. Sarah Kuck Abt Associates Inc. Linda Truitt, Ph.D. 55 Wheeler Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Contents Executive Summary...............................................................................................................iii History of Methamphetamine Use .................................................................................iii Trends.............................................................................................................................iii Characteristics of Users and Adverse Effects ................................................................ iv Trafficking, Production, Regulation................................................................................ v Treatment ....................................................................................................................... vi Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: Methamphetamine Use in the United States .................................................. 3 1.1 History of Methamphetamine ............................................................................. 3 1.2 Trends in Methamphetamine Use ....................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Methamphetamine Use, 1989-2004.......................................................... 6 1.2.2 Self-Reported Methamphetamine Use...................................................... 7 1.2.3 Administrative Datasets.......................................................................... 11 1.2.4 Interview and Bioassay Drug Use Indicators.......................................... 15 1.2.5 Private Sector Information...................................................................... 16 1.3 Who Uses Methamphetamine? ......................................................................... 18 1.3.1 Gender..................................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 Age.......................................................................................................... 19 1.3.3 Ethnicity.................................................................................................. 20 1.3.4 Methamphetamine Use Among Arrestees .............................................. 21 1.3.5 Use in Subpopulations ............................................................................ 22 Chapter 2: Production and Trafficking ........................................................................... 23 2.1. Methods of Methamphetamine Manufacture.................................................... 23 2.1.1 Sources of Methamphetamine and Precursors........................................ 23 2.1.2 Methamphetamine “Recipes” ................................................................. 23 2.1.3 Small Toxic Laboratories........................................................................ 24 2.2 U.S. and Global Markets for Methamphetamine and Precursor Chemicals..... 26 2.2.1 Sources of Methamphetamine and Precursors........................................ 26 2.2.2 Production in Superlabs .......................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Methamphetamine and International Trafficking ................................... 32 2.2.4 Chemical Diversion and Control ............................................................ 35 2.2.5 Regulating Chemicals in Other Countries .............................................. 36 2.2.6 U.S. Federal Law Enforcement and Prosecution.................................... 37 2.3 Methamphetamine Retail Markets.................................................................... 40 Chapter 3: Treatment for Methamphetamine Abuse ..................................................... 44 3.1 What Are the Effects of Methamphetamine?.................................................... 44 3.1.1 What is the effect of methamphetamine on the brain? ........................... 45 3.1.2 Child Endangerment ............................................................................... 47 Abt Associates Inc. Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned i 3.2 Treating Methamphetamine Abuse................................................................... 47 3.3 Pharmacotherapies ............................................................................................ 49 Chapter 4: Summary and Lessons Learned .................................................................... 51 The Case of a Rural Town............................................................................................. 53 Some Lessons Learned.................................................................................................. 54 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 56 Abt Associates Inc. Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned ii Executive Summary This report provides an overview of the methamphetamine problem in the United States. It looks at the history of the problem, trends in use, characteristics of users, adverse effects, trafficking and production and treatment issues. The analysis relies on extensive review of extant literature on the drug, analysis of existing datasets relevant to methamphetamine use, and conversations with law enforcement treatment, and government personnel dealing with the problem. History of Methamphetamine Use Amphetamines, including methamphetamine, were first synthesized in the early part of the 20th century, although they were not identified for medical use until the 1930s. First manufactured as a bronchial dilator, they were quickly prescribed for a variety of other conditions—narcolepsy, attention deficit disorder, obesity, and fatigue. With an increasing problem of abuse of these drugs due to legal availability and easy access in the 1950s and 1960s, amphetamines/methamphetamine were made Schedule II substances in 1970. Through the next decade, further restrictions on prescriptions and on the precursor chemicals needed for manufacture resulted in reductions in use nationwide. Methamphetamine had faded from a previous national popularity rivaled only by marijuana until reappearing in Hawaii and the West in the 1980s. Trends Throughout the 1990s, methamphetamine use grew steadily in the West and Northwest. By the turn of the millennium, it had reappeared in many areas of the Midwest and South and surfaced to a lesser degree in the Northeast and Mid Atlantic. In the general population, as reflected in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), methamphetamine use rose from just under 2% of the adult population in 1994 to approximately 5% in 2004. Reporting on youth, Monitoring the Future (MTF) reports that amphetamine/methampheta- mine use has remained stable over the last decade for both 8th graders and 12th graders, dropping slightly in 2003. Data from the Youth Behavioral Risk Surveillance System (YBRSS) shows similarly stable, if not slightly declining, numbers of users among youth nationwide. National treatment data from the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) on admissions to treatment indicate a steady rise in the number of persons nationwide who enter treatment for methamphetamine abuse. From 1992 to 2002 the rate of treatment admissions for methamphetamine abuse in the U.S. increased fivefold, from less than 1% in 1992 to over 6% in 2003. The Drug Abuse Warning Network emergency room reports show a similar trend nationally: a slight rise from just under 16,000 mentions in 1995 to 17,696 in 2002. Abt Associates Inc. Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned iii But National trends are seriously misleading. While national data such as these show some increases, albeit at low levels, regional data on methamphetamine use provide a far more serious picture of the problem. TEDS data show that in 1992 only two states (Hawaii and California) reported more than 5% of total treatment admissions were for methamphetamine. In 2003, 26 states reported over 5%, 8 states reported over 20%, and 2 states (Hawaii and Idaho) reported over 40% methamphetamine admissions. The highest rates were reported in Hawaii and the West, where states like Idaho reported 42%, Nevada reported 28%, and California reported 31%. Midwestern states like Iowa (20%), and Southern states like Arkansas (22%)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EL PASO INTELLIGENCE CENTER DRUG TREND Synthetic Stimulants Marketed As Bath Salts
    LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE EPIC Tactical Intelligence Bulletins EL PASO INTELLIGENCE CENTER DRUG TREND TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN EB11-16 ● Synthetic Stimulants Marketed as Bath Salts ● March 8, 2011 This document is the property of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and is marked Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES). Further dissemination of this document is strictly forbidden except to other law enforcement agencies for criminal law enforcement purposes. The following information must be handled and protected accordingly. Summary Across the United States, synthetic stimulants that are sold as “bath salts”¹ have become a serious drug abuse threat. These products are produced under a variety of faux brand names, and they are indirectly marketed as legal alternatives to cocaine, amphetamine, and Ecstasy (MDMA or 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine). Poison control centers nationwide have received hundreds of calls related to the side-effects of, and overdoses from, the use of these potent and unpredictable products. Numerous media reports have cited bath salt stimulant overdose incidents that have resulted in emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and severe psychotic episodes, some of which, have led to violent outbursts, self-inflicted wounds, and even suicides. A number of states have imposed emergency measures to ban bath salt stimulant products (or the chemicals in them) including Florida, Louisiana, North Dakota, and West Virginia; and similar measures are pending in Hawaii, Kentucky, Michigan, and Mississippi. A prominent U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Prohibition and the Weakness of Public Policy
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 1994 Bad Trip: Drug Prohibition and the Weakness of Public Policy Randy E. Barnett Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1252 103 Yale L.J. 2593-2630 (1994) (reviewing Steven B. Duke & Albert C. Gross, AMERICA'S LONGEST WAR: RETHINKING OUR TRAGIC CRUSADE AGAINST DRUGS (1993)) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Book Review Bad Trip: Drug Prohibition and the Weakness of Public Policy America's Longest War: Rethinking Our Tragic Crusade Against Drugs. By Steven B. Duke & Albert C. Gross. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1993. Pp. xix, 348. $26.95. Randy E. Barnettt INTRODUCTION Popular support for drug prohibition-especially among those who have given the matter any thought-is like support for George Bush just after Operation Desert Storm: very broad and very thin. Perhaps some personal experiences of mine will illustrate why. Personal Anecdote Number One: In the early morning hours of February 24, 1979, Michael Salcedo, his brother Arthur, and their friend Frank Mussa decided to buy some marijuana. Because marijuana is illegal, they could not go to the same legitimate businesses that sell tobacco or alcohol. So the three young men set out for Latin Eagles territory on the north side of Chicago; specifically to King Kastle, a hamburger stand that gang members were known t Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill No. 2191
    SECOND REGULAR SESSION HOUSE BILL NO. 2191 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE QUADE. 5582H.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal section 579.060, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to controlled substances, with penalty provisions. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Section 579.060, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu 2 thereof, to be known as section 579.060, to read as follows: 579.060. 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful sale, distribution, or purchase of 2 over-the-counter methamphetamine precursor drugs if he or she knowingly: 3 (1) Sells, distributes, dispenses, or otherwise provides any number of packages of any 4 drug product containing detectable amounts of ephedrine, levomethamphetamine, 5 phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any of their salts, optical 6 isomers, or salts of optical isomers, in a total amount greater than nine grams to the same 7 individual within a thirty-day period, unless the amount is dispensed, sold, or distributed 8 pursuant to a valid prescription; or 9 (2) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a thirty-day period any number of 10 packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 11 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any 12 of their salts or optical isomers, or salts of optical isomers in a total amount greater than nine 13 grams, without regard to the number of transactions, unless the amount is purchased, received, 14 or acquired pursuant to a valid prescription; or 15 (3) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a twenty-four-hour period any 16 number of packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 17 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted from the law.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Assessment of Ephedra Species (Ephedra Spp.)
    Annex 3 Ref. Ares(2010)892815 – 02/12/2010 Recognising risks – Protecting Health Federal Institute for Risk Assessment Annex 2 to 5-3539-02-5591315 Scientific assessment of Ephedra species (Ephedra spp.) Purpose of assessment The Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), in collaboration with the ALS working party on dietary foods, nutrition and classification issues, has compiled a hit list of 10 substances, the consumption of which may pose a health risk. These plants, which include Ephedra species (Ephedra L.) and preparations made from them, contain substances with a strong pharmacological and/or psychoactive effect. The Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection has already asked the EU Commission to start the procedure under Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 for these plants and preparations, for the purpose of including them in one of the three lists in Annex III. The assessment applies to ephedra alkaloid-containing ephedra haulm. The risk assessment of the plants was carried out on the basis of the Guidance on Safety Assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements published by the EFSA1 and the BfR guidelines on health assessments2. Result We know that ingestion of ephedra alkaloid-containing Ephedra haulm represents a risk from medicinal use in the USA and from the fact that it has now been banned as a food supplement in the USA. Serious unwanted and sometimes life-threatening side effects are associated with the ingestion of food supplements containing ephedra alkaloids. Due to the risks described, we would recommend that ephedra alkaloid-containing Ephedra haulm be classified in List A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006.
    [Show full text]
  • FSI-D-16-00226R1 Title
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Forensic Science International Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: FSI-D-16-00226R1 Title: An overview of Emerging and New Psychoactive Substances in the United Kingdom Article Type: Review Article Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances Psychostimulants Lefetamine Hallucinogens LSD Derivatives Benzodiazepines Corresponding Author: Prof. Simon Gibbons, Corresponding Author's Institution: UCL School of Pharmacy First Author: Simon Gibbons Order of Authors: Simon Gibbons; Shruti Beharry Abstract: The purpose of this review is to identify emerging or new psychoactive substances (NPS) by undertaking an online survey of the UK NPS market and to gather any data from online drug fora and published literature. Drugs from four main classes of NPS were identified: psychostimulants, dissociative anaesthetics, hallucinogens (phenylalkylamine-based and lysergamide-based materials) and finally benzodiazepines. For inclusion in the review the 'user reviews' on drugs fora were selected based on whether or not the particular NPS of interest was used alone or in combination. NPS that were use alone were considered. Each of the classes contained drugs that are modelled on existing illegal materials and are now covered by the UK New Psychoactive Substances Bill in 2016. Suggested Reviewers: Title Page (with authors and addresses) An overview of Emerging and New Psychoactive Substances in the United Kingdom Shruti Beharry and Simon Gibbons1 Research Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry UCL School of Pharmacy
    [Show full text]
  • Subchronic Continuous Phencyclidine Administration Potentiates Amphetamine-Induced Frontal Cortex Dopamine Release
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 34–44 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Subchronic Continuous Phencyclidine Administration Potentiates Amphetamine-Induced Frontal Cortex Dopamine Release Andrea Balla1, Henry Sershen1,2, Michael Serra1, Rajeth Koneru1 and Daniel C Javitt*,1,2 1 2 Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Functional dopaminergic hyperactivity is a key feature of schizophrenia. Etiology of this dopaminergic hyperactivity, however, is unknown. We have recently demonstrated that subchronic phencyclidine (PCP) treatment in rodents induces striatal dopaminergic hyperactivity similar to that observed in schizophrenia. The present study investigates the ability of PCP to potentiate amphetamine-induced dopamine release in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell. Prefrontal dopaminergic hyperactivity is postulated to underlie cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. In contrast, the degree of NAc involvement is unknown and recent studies have suggested that PCP-induced hyperactivity in rodents may correlate with PFC, rather than NAc, dopamine levels. Rats were treated with 5–20 mg/kg/day PCP for 3–14 days by osmotic minipump. PFC and NAc dopamine release to amphetamine challenge (1 mg/kg) was monitored by in vivo microdialysis and HPLC-EC. Doses of 10 mg/kg/day and above produced serum PCP concentrations (50–150 ng/ml) most associated with PCP psychosis in humans. PCP-treated rats showed significant, dose-dependent enhancement in amphetamine-induced dopamine release in PFC but not NAc, along with significantly enhanced locomotor activity. Enhanced response was observed following 3-day, as well as 14-day, treatment and resolved within 4 days of PCP treatment withdrawal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stimulants and Hallucinogens Under Consideration: a Brief Overview of Their Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 17 (1986) 107-118 107 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. THE STIMULANTS AND HALLUCINOGENS UNDER CONSIDERATION: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THEIR CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY LOUIS S. HARRIS Dcparlmcnl of Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Unwersity, Richmond, VA 23298 (U.S.A.) SUMMARY The substances under review are a heterogenous set of compounds from a pharmacological point of view, though many have a common phenylethyl- amine structure. Variations in structure lead to marked changes in potency and characteristic action. The introductory material presented here is meant to provide a set of chemical and pharmacological highlights of the 28 substances under con- sideration. The most commonly used names or INN names, Chemical Abstract (CA) names and numbers, and elemental formulae are provided in the accompanying figures. This provides both some basic information on the substances and a starting point for the more detailed information that follows in the individual papers by contributors to the symposium. Key words: Stimulants, their chemistry and pharmacology - Hallucinogens, their chemistry and pharmacology INTRODUCTION Cathine (Fig. 1) is one of the active principles of khat (Catha edulis). The structure has two asymmetric centers and exists as two geometric isomers, each of which has been resolved into its optical isomers. In the plant it exists as d-nor-pseudoephedrine. It is a typical sympathomimetic amine with a strong component of amphetamine-like activity. The racemic mixture is known generically in this country and others as phenylpropanolamine (dl- norephedrine). It is widely available as an over-the-counter (OTC) anti- appetite agent and nasal decongestant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecstasy Or Molly (MDMA) (Canadian Drug Summary)
    www.ccsa.ca • www.ccdus.ca November 2017 Canadian Drug Summary Ecstasy or Molly (MDMA) Key Points Ecstasy and molly are street names for pills or tablets that are assumed to contain the active ingredient 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine (MDMA). Although most people consuming ecstasy or molly expect the main psychoactive ingredient to be MDMA, pills, capsules and powder sold as ecstasy or molly frequently contain other ingredients (such as synthetic cathinones or other adulterants) in addition to MDMA and sometimes contain no MDMA at all. The prevalence of Canadians aged 15 and older reporting past-year ecstasy use is less than 1%. 1 in 25 Canadian youth in grades 10–12 have reported using ecstasy in the past 12 months. Introduction Ecstasy and molly are street names for pills, capsules or powder assumed to contain MDMA (3,4- methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine), a synthetically derived chemical that is used recreationally as a party drug. Pills are typically coloured and stamped with a logo. These drugs are made in illegal laboratories, often with a number of different chemicals, so they might not contain MDMA or contain MDMA in amounts that vary significantly from batch to batch. Other active ingredients found in tablets sold as ecstasy or molly in Canada in 2016–2017 include synthetic cathinones or “bath salts” such as ethylone, methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and its precursor methylenedioxyphenylpropionamide (MMDPPA). Other adulterants reported were caffeine, procaine, methylsulfonylmethane (MSA)and methamphetamine.1 In 2011–2012, paramethoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) was present in pills sold as ecstasy in Canada. This adulteration resulted in the deaths of 27 individuals in Alberta and British Columbia over an 11-month period.2 Effects of Ecstasy Use The effects of ecstasy are directly linked to the active ingredients in the pill.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Ethanol and Cocaine, Amphetamine, Or MDMA in the Rat: Thermoregulatory and Locomotor Effects
    Psychopharmacology DOI 10.1007/s00213-007-1007-5 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Interactions between ethanol and cocaine, amphetamine, or MDMA in the rat: thermoregulatory and locomotor effects Sami Ben Hamida & Erin Plute & Brigitte Cosquer & Christian Kelche & Byron C. Jones & Jean-Christophe Cassel Received: 22 May 2007 /Accepted: 29 October 2007 # Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract duced by EtOH alone. Conversely, EtOH attenuated Rationale (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine MDMA-related hyperthermia, an effect increasing across (MDMA, ecstasy) is often taken recreationally with ethanol treatment days. These results demonstrate that the interac- (EtOH). In rats, EtOH may potentiate MDMA-induced tion between MDMA and EtOH may be different from the hyperactivity, but attenuate hyperthermia. interaction between EtOH and AMPH or COCA. Objective Experiment 1 compared the interactions between Conclusion Because of potential health-related consequen- EtOH (1.5 g/kg) and MDMA (6.6 mg/kg) with EtOH + ces of such polydrug misuse, it is worth identifying the cocaine (COCA; 10 mg/kg) and EtOH + amphetamine mechanisms underlying these interactions, especially be- (AMPH; 1 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and thermoregu- tween EtOH and MDMA. Given the different affinity lation. Experiment 2 used a weaker dose of MDMA profiles of the three drugs for serotonin, dopamine, and (3.3 mg/kg) and larger doses of COCA (20 mg/kg) and norepinephrine transporters, our results appear compatible AMPH (2 mg/kg). with the possibility of an important role of serotonin in at Materials and methods Drug treatments were administered least the EtOH-induced potentiation of MDMA-induced on four occasions (2, 5, and 2 days apart, respectively; hyperlocomotion.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Parents in the Anti-Doping Fight: a Test of the Viability of a Parent-Based Prevention Program
    1 Social Science Research Fund: Incorporating Parents in the Anti-Doping Fight: A Test of the Viability of a Parent-Based Prevention Program Final Report Submitted to: World Anti-Doping Agency Prepared by: Tonya Dodge, Ph.D. Skidmore College* *Investigator will be moving to The George Washington University Contact Information: Tonya Dodge, Ph.D. The George Washington University Department of psychology 2125 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20052 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Interventions Targeting AS Use ....................................................................................................................... 6 Building Parent-Based Interventions: Considerations ........................................................................... 7 A Parent-Based Framework to Prevent AS and NS Use ......................................................................... 9 Study Aims ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 Methods ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. CAMBODIA 1.1 General Situation 1.1.1 Drug Use There Are No
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 15 April 2014 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 8990/14 CORDROGUE 26 ASIE 22 NOTE From: Japanese Regional Chair of the Dublin Group To: Dublin Group No. prev. doc.: 14715/13 Subject: Regional Report on South East Asia and China 1. CAMBODIA 1.1 General situation 1.1.1 Drug use There are no consistent statistics as to the exact number of people who use drugs in Cambodia. However the general consensus among the Royal Government of Cambodia and international agencies is that there are currently between 12,000 and 28,000 people who use drugs. Methamphetamine pills are the most widely used drug in Cambodia, although crystalline methamphetamine is becoming more widely available, with use on the rise, particularly in Phnom Penh and among unemployed youth. Whereas illicit drug use was previously concentrated primarily in urban settings, in recent years it has been expanding into rural areas, in particular in the provinces adjacent to Lao PDR and Thailand (INCSR Cambodia 2012). Drug use among women and within prisons appears to be on the rise (UNODC 2013). 8990/14 JV/fm 1 DG D 2C EN Table 1. Rank of primary drugs of concern in Cambodia, 2008-2012 Drug type 2008 2009 2010** 2011*** 2012**** Methamphetamine pills ● 2* 1 2 2 Crystalline methamphetamine ● 1* 2 1 1 Ecstasy ● ● ● 6 ● Cannabis ● ● 4 4 4 Heroin ● ● 3 5 ● Inhalants ● ● ● 3 3 Opium ● ● ● ● ● ● = Not reported Source(s): *NACD 2010a. **2010 rankings based on DAINAP data and Cambodia country reports. ***NACD 2012b. ****2012 rankings are based on data provided by the National Authority for Combating Drugs.
    [Show full text]