DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015 HIGHLIGHTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2015 HIGHLIGHTS 2015 GWP in action 2015 Annual Report About GWP The Global Water Partnership's vision is for a water secure world. Our mission is to advance governance and management of water resources for sustainable and equitable development. The Global Water Partnership (GWP) is an international network that was created in 1996 to foster the implementation of integrated water resources management: the coordinated development and management of water, land, and related resources in order to maximise economic and social welfare without compromising the sustainability of ecosystems and the environment. The GWP Network is open to all organisations that recognise the principles of integrated water resources management endorsed by the Network. It includes states, government institutions (national, regional, and local), intergovernmental organisations, international and national non-governmental organisations, civil society groupings, academic and research institutions, private sector companies, and service providers in the public sector. At the end of 2015, the Network had 13 Regional Water Partnerships, 85 Country Water Partnerships, and 3,201 Partners located in 182 countries. (GWP is currently reviewing the status of its partnership base.) GWP Region Countries Partners GWP Partners by type Caribbean 24 101 Central Africa 6 174 International Research/educational organisations 2 Central America 7 187 institutions 16 Central and Eastern Europe 13 171 Government/ public 25 Central Asia and Caucasus 9 176 Professional associations 4 China 1 101 Eastern Africa 10 214 Mediterranean 25 90 South America 10 331 Private South Asia 7 538 sector 13 Southeast Asia 10 250 Southern Africa 13 330 Other 2 West Africa 15 290 Global 32 248 Network/NGO 38 Total 2015 182 3,201 Total 2014 178 3,051 Country Water Partnerships Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Czech Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Laos PDR, Latvia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Mozambique, Moldova, Mongolia, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of the Congo, Romania, Rwanda, São Tomé e Príncipe, Senegal, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zambia, Zimbabwe. CONTENTS Message from the Chair . 4 Overview from the Executive Secretary ..........................................................................4 From the Chair of the GWP Technical Committee ..........................................................5 GWP AROUND THE WORLD: 2015 HIGHLIGHTS.............................................................6 GWP's results framework ................................................................................................8 Goal 1: Catalyse change in policies and practice ........................................................ 9 FEATURE – Water security and resilience to climate change ..................... 14 FEATURE – Towards 2030: Sustainable development in a water secure world . 20 Goal 2: Generate and communicate knowledge.........................................................22 FEATURE – GWP: A knowledge hub . 24 Goal 3: Strengthen partnerships .................................................................................27 FEATURE – Women and water: A close connection .................................... 29 FEATURE – Empowering future generations: Engaging young people in creating a water secure world............................................... 30 Financial report 2015 . 32 GWP Technical Committee publications...................................................................... 34 New partners in GWP 2015 .......................................................................................... 36 Who's who in GWP 2015.............................................................................................. 38 Strategies, stronger South–South cooperation among Message from the Chair partners, greater visibility at the global level, and a more The year 2015 has been a active Network of Partners reflecting on-going governance challenging and inspiring reforms – these bear witness to our joint collaborative one for the Global Water efforts under my chairmanship as we travel towards a Partnership family. It has water secure world. been a year of transition and transformation in I urge you to maintain momentum and to use the current which our partners in an favourable winds to push ever forward on this fascinating increasingly globalized and journey. changing world have had even greater voice. Overview from the Together with our diverse Executive Secretary Network of Partners, we have begun to implement In a year when the issues Dr Ursula Schaefer-Preuss the GWP Strategy Towards of migration, climate 2020 – A Water Secure change, and inequality World. Achieving water security requires fundamental continued to hit the changes in values, beliefs, perceptions, and political headlines, it was uplifting positions, not only among water management institutions, to see the global but also among all stakeholders. Such changes are slowly community recognise water taking place. The GWP family has worked hard to become as central to sustainable actively involved at the global level and on the ground by and inclusive growth in the helping to catalyse change in policies and practice, 2030 Agenda for Sustainable generating and communicating knowledge, and Development. strengthening partnerships; with these activities implementing GWP’s three strategic goals for 2014–2019. Starting in 2016, this Agenda coincides with Rudolph Cleveringa We know there is still a long way to go before we realise GWP’s 20th Anniversary. our vision of a water secure world and accomplish our This alignment will provide additional opportunities to mission – to advance governance and management of support countries as they implement the water-related water resources for sustainable and equitable Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). GWP's new SDG development. The adoption of three ground-breaking Preparedness Facility (see page 21) builds on our 20 global agreements in 2015 – the 2030 Agenda for years of experience. With a successful track record in Sustainable Development, including a dedicated water convening multiple stakeholders to solve water goal; the Adoption of the Paris Agreement on Climate problems with an integrated approach – for which there Change; and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk is now political support – GWP is well positioned to play Reduction – sets the scene to put water absolutely at the a leadership role as a multi-stakeholder partnership in centre of future efforts for equitable and sustainable the emerging international water architecture. human development. Our intervention logic has paid off – and continues to GWP now has a unique chance to place itself at the service reap dividends. As you read the stories in this report, of the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development you will see how GWP engages in country-level agenda- agreed on by the world community, drawing on 20 years of setting, influencing policy change that leads to know-how to support regions and countries in investment in climate-resilient water security, and implementing the water-related development goals. There demonstrating best practice through scalable projects. are many entry points for activities to contribute to this Long-term interactions with regional economic ambition and we will implement concrete actions focusing commissions and international finance institutions on interventions where GWP can add value. underpin the importance of addressing transboundary dimensions. Communicating knowledge is another route It has been an honour and a privilege to provide strategic to catalysing change, for example through the new guidance to the GWP family during my three–year tenure Integrated Drought Management Programme in Central as GWP Chair. The Strategy 2020, the Gender and Youth and Eastern Europe. 4 GWP in Action 2015 Annual Report The water-related SDGs give renewed focus to improving opportunities, and social preferences. Furthermore, the quality, inclusiveness, and diversity of the Network investments should be tailored to the context. All of this Partners. Through enhancing the performance of the requires refined analytical tools, holistic perspectives, Regional and Country Water Partnerships, we will innovation, and continuous monitoring, assessment, and strengthen national capacity to engage key allies in adaptation. GWP’s Technical Committee aims to agenda-setting, implementation, monitoring, and review transform this agenda into reality and to identify a of the Goals, particularly addressing the Means of coherent set of insights that will provide the basis for Implementation through a water lens. concrete action. The global secretariat thanks our Partners, staff of the The year 2015 ended my second term as Chair of the Regional and Country Water Partnerships, governance Technical Committee. My aim was to build a proactive bodies, and our donors for their commitment to water Technical Committee, whose members were involved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Irrigation and Collective Action- a Study in Method with Reference to the Shiwalik Hills, Haryana
    IRRIGATION AND COLLECTIVE ACTION- A STUDY IN METHOD WITH REFERENCE TO THE SHIWALIK HILLS, HARYANA Mathew Kurian Associate Expert- Institutions and Policy Studies International Water Management Institute Bangkok Thailand Professor Ton Dietz Department of Geography University of Amsterdam The Netherlands ( 21/04/2004) Abstract In recent years decentralized development approaches have gained prominence in the agricultural sector. A host of community based watershed management projects have been implemented that encourage community organizations to undertake management of previously government controlled irrigation systems and forests. Community organizations have been given the responsibility of managing water distribution, collection of irrigation service fees and undertaking routine maintenance of irrigation infrastructure. In this context analysis of irrigation management has argued that groups that are relatively homogeneous may fare better than heterogeneous groups in facilitating collective action. However, this paper argues that analysis of the influence of group heterogeneity on collective action is complicated because of its multi-dimensional nature and the presence on non-monotonic effects in mechanisms linking heterogeneity and collective outcomes. We emphasize therefore, the importance of context specification in analysis of group heterogeneity through a discussion of elements of a joint management contract in Haryana, identification of key variables with a potential to explain collective action in irrigation management and construction
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Report: Food Security in Vietnam - Enforcing Policies and Responding to Climate Change from the Rice Sector
    ___________________________________________________________________________ 2017/PPFS/WKSP1/009 Discussion Report: Food Security in Vietnam - Enforcing Policies and Responding to Climate Change from the Rice Sector Submitted by: Viet Nam Workshop on Strengthening APEC Cooperation on Food Security and Climate Change Ha Noi, Viet Nam 19-21 April 2017 4/5/2017 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAM DICUSSSION REPORT Food security in Vietnam- Enforcing policies and Responding to climate change from the rice sector Overview of the rice sector in Vietnam 1 4/5/2017 Rice supply-demand balance in Vietnam and rice exports Tr. Ton Policy enforcement Before 2016 a. Policy on production development : • From 2016-present + Support farmers to protect and develop rice land + Tax support, irrigation fee for rice farmers. Decision No. 1898/QD-BNN- + Support to overcome damage caused by natural disasters, epidemics TT of 2016 approving the + Policies on preferential credit, support rice production to ensure safety under VietGAP; Policy to support mechanization and reduce post-harvest Project "Restructuring losses. b. Policy on development of rice processing and by-products Vietnam Rice Sector to 2020 consumption + Support for new technology, trial production, and processing facilities. with a Vision to 2030" issued + Credit support to purchase machinery products, mechanical equipment, by the Ministry of Agriculture facilities for agricultural production and processing + Support the construction of raw material areas, to link production and and Rural Development consumption of paddy rice + The Decision 706/QD-TTg in 2015 approving the scheme on development of Vietnam's rice brand to 2020 with a vision to 2030 promulgated by the Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Sustainable Coffee Production in Vietnam
    Economic Analysis of Sustainable Coffee Production in Vietnam Thong Quoc Ho Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Economics and Finance Faculty of Business Queensland University of Technology Principal supervisor: Dr Viet-Ngu (Vincent) Hoang Associate supervisor: Prof. Clevo Wilson 2018 Statement of original authorship The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made. Signature: QUT verified signature Date: June 2018 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Economic Analysis of Sustainable Coffee Production in Vietnam i Keywords Coffee, cost, data envelopment analysis (DEA), efficiency, environment, farming, irrigation water, material balance principles (MBP), meta-frontier, meta-technology ratio (MTR), nutrient, stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Economic Analysis of Sustainable Coffee Production in Vietnam ii Abstract Vietnam is the second largest coffee producer in the world. The little literature reports that coffee farming in Vietnam has been increasingly economically and environmentally unsustainable. More specially, few studies documented that the consumption of chemical fertilisers
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation of Irrigation on Rural Household Welfare: Evidence from Vietnam
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Impact Evaluation of Irrigation on Rural Household Welfare: Evidence from Vietnam Nguyen, Trang and Nguyen, Cuong 15 February 2016 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93134/ MPRA Paper No. 93134, posted 08 Apr 2019 03:48 UTC IMPACT EVALUATION OF IRRIGATION ON RURAL HOUSEHOLD WELFARE: EVIDENCE FROM VIETNAM Nguyen Thu Trang Nguyen Viet Cuong Abstract This paper examines the effect of communal irrigation plants on income and agricultural activities of rural households in Vietnam. Household-level and commune-level data from VHLSS 2010-2012 were analyzed using fixed effect regression. The paper finds no evidence of significant impacts of communal irrigation plants on households’ income, income structure and rice cultivation activities. These results imply the weak operation and maintenance of public irrigation plants as well as the lack of integrated water resource management to ensure water input for irrigation systems. Keywords: irrigation systems; household welfare; impact evaluation; Vietnam. ---------------------------- * This paper is partly from the Master Paper of Nguyen Thu Trang in the Master Degree Program in Development Economics at the Institute of Public Policy and Management (IPPM) of National Economics University, Vietnam. 1 1. Introduction Irrigation infrastructure has long been considered crucial to the economic development in rural areas, especially for regions which rely heavily on agriculture for income and livelihoods. In these regions, raising farm productivity and creation of livelihoods are essential for poverty alleviation, and irrigation acts as a springboard for economic development. Since the 1950s, countries have tried to expand the coverage of irrigation infrastructure with the most significant achievement witnessed in South and East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coffee Production in the Face of Climate Change: Vietnam
    COFFEE PRODUCTION IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE: VIETNAM KEY PRODUCTION AREAS IN VIETNAM OBSERVED AND PREDICTED EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN COFFEE PRODUCING AREAS (6,7,8,9,10) Dien Hanoi Bien Son La Rising Temperatures Changing Seasonality Provinces with Arabica • Annual mean temperature • Longer rainy season Production expected to increase by 1.8°C • More days with very little rain by 2050 in the dry season > 10,000 tons/year • Increase in hot days and < 10,000 tons/year nights and decrease in diurnal temperature range Kon Provinces with Robusta Tum Production Gia Lai > 50,000 tons/year Dak Lak < 50,000 tons/year Dak Nong Lam Changing Rainfall Extreme Weather Events Dong • Slight increase in rainfall, with • More frequent heavy rainfall more rain in the wet and less events in the wet season rain in the dry season • Droughts becoming more frequent and intense About 90% of coffee is produced in the Central Highland provinces Dak Lak, Lam Dong, Dak Nong and Gia Lai.(2) LIKELY IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON COFFEE PRODUCTION Arabica Robusta Predicted changes in coffee producing areas: • Over 20% of the area suitable for Arabica coffee today is expected to become unsuitable by 2050.(8) • The altitudinal range for Robusta cultivated in the Central Highlands will likely shift from today’s 300-900m to 600-1,000m by 2050. Suitability below 550m will decline sharply.(10) • The loss of suitable area for Robusta will be biggest in Gia Lai and Dak Lak the provinces, with about 30% of the currently suitable area. Lam Dong and Dak Nong will remain suitable, with higher areas becoming more suitable.(10) However, these areas are likely forested or used for other crops, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Economic Evaluation of Irrigation
    The impact of Irrigation on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from India Songqing Jin1 Winston Yu2 Hans G.P. Jansen2 Rie Muraoka1 1) Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] 2) World Bank, 1818 H St., NW, Washington DC Selected Poster prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 18-24 August, 2012. Copyright 2012 by [authors]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non- commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. The impact of Irrigation on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from India Using plot level production data from a nation-wide survey in India, we study the impact of irrigation on crop productivity, land prices and cropping intensities. Our main identification strategy is based on a sufficient number of households cultivating multiple plots of different irrigation status. After household fixed effects and plot characteristics are controlled for, our estimations show that irrigation has a strong and significant impact on all these outcomes with the dominant effects on cropping intensities. We find quality of irrigation also matters. Our results provide support for continuing investments to improve access and quality of irrigation in India. Crop yields everywhere in the developing world are consistently higher in irrigated areas than in rainfed areas (Rosegrant and Perez 1997; Ringler et al. 2000; Hussain and Hanjra 2004; Lipton et al. 2005). About 17% of global agricultural land is irrigated contributing about 40% to the world’s production of cereal crops (WCD 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation and Income-Poverty Alleviation: a Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems in Developing Asia
    Irrigation and Income-Poverty Alleviation: A Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems in Developing Asia Intizar Hussain and Deeptha Wijerathna International Water Management Institute (IWMI) February 2004 Irrigation and Income-Poverty Alleviation: A Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Systems in Developing Asia Intizar Hussain and Deeptha Wijerathna Summary This study forms part of the ADB-funded multi-country project on ‘Pro-poor intervention strategies in irrigated agriculture in Asia’ implemented by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) in collaboration with national partners in six Asian countries: Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan and Vietnam. These are among the top few countries where substantial investments have been made in the development of large- and medium-scale canal irrigation systems, where irrigated agriculture provides livelihoods to hundreds of millions of rural people. These countries together account for over 51 percent of global net irrigated area and over 73 percent of net irrigated area in Asia , with most of this area located in China, India and Pakistan. The study addresses some of the key questions in relation to irrigation and rural poverty: Does irrigation reduce poverty? What is the magnitude of the poverty problem and what are the key determinants of poverty in irrigation systems? Do inequities in land and water distribution and their differential access have impacts on poverty in irrigation systems? Are there any spatial patterns in poverty in irrigation systems? What are the system-level characteristics that help improve performance and enhance antipoverty impacts of irrigation? In addition to synthesizing the review of past work on irrigation-poverty linkages, the study assesses poverty performance of irrigation systems, quantifies key causes and determinants of poverty, and identifies conditions for greater antipoverty impacts of irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects Case Studies
    Paper number 117 ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT PAPERS Natural Resource Management Series Environment Department THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433 Telephone: 202-473-3641 Facsimile: 202-477-0565 Plans, and Projects Policies, Resources in Water Environmental Flows Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects Case Studies Rafik Hirji and Richard Davis April 2009 Sustainable Development Vice Presidency Printed on recycled paper stock, using soy inks. cover 117 Env flows.indd 1 4/16/2009 4:56:49 PM THE WORLD BANK ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects Case Studies Rafik Hirji and Richard Davis April 2009 Papers in this series are not formal publications of the World Bank. They are circulated to encourage thought and discussion. The use and citation of this paper should take this into account. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank. Copies are available from the Environment Department of the World Bank by calling 202-473-3641. Environmental flow 4-9-09.indd 1 4/9/09 12:44:47 PM © The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. Manufactured in the United States of America First printing January 2008 Design: Jim Cantrell Cover photo: Gas flaring, natural gas being burned to CO2 during oil production: Simone D. McCourtie/World Bank Photo Library © The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Main System Management for Improved Irrigation Management
    LINKING MAIN SYSTEM MANAGEMENT FOR IMPROVED IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT Report of the APO Seminar on Linking Main System Management for Improved Irrigation Management held in Sri Lanka, 3-8 June 2002 (02-AG-GE-SEM-08) This report was edited by Dr. C. M. Wijayaratna, Institutional Development Specialist/Agricultural Economist, Auckland, New Zealand. The opinions expressed in this publication do not reflect the official view of the Asian Productivity Organization. For reproduction of the contents in part or in full, the APO’s prior permission is required. ©Asian Productivity Organization, 2004 CONTENTS Foreword Part I Summary of Findings ....................................................... 1 Part II Resource Papers 1. Issues and Constraints in Linking Main System Management for Improved Irrigation Management……………………………… H. M. Jayathilleke ... 13 2. Measures to Improve Linkage between Main System Management and Farm-level Management…………………………………… M. M. M. Aheeyar ... 17 3. Irrigation Associations and Improved Irrigation Performance… Norman T. Uphoff ... 29 4. Sustainable Irrigation Development………………………………… Ian W. Makin ... 39 5. Role of Public and Private Sectors, NGOs, Water Users’ Associations and Other Stakeholders in Irrigation Management in the 21st Century ………………………………………………………………… C. M. Wijayaratna ... 48 Part III Selected Country Papers 1. Bangladesh………………………………………………………… Roxana Quader ... 69 2. Republic of China…………………………………………………… Ming-Daw Su ... 75 3. India (1)…………………………………………………… Phanish Kumar Sinha ... 81 4. India (2)…………………………………………………………………… Veer Pal ... 94 5. Japan……………………………………………………………… Naoya Fujimoto . 100 6. Republic of Korea………………………………………………… Sang-Ok Chung . 112 7. Malaysia………………………………………………………… Anuar Bin Yahya . 122 8. Pakistan…………………………………………………………… Illahi B. Shaikh . 128 9. Thailand…………………………………………………… Apinon Sonthayanoon . 133 10. Vietnam……………………………………………………………… Tran Viet On . 136 Part IV Appendices 1. List of Participants, Resource Speakers, and Secretariat........................ 145 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture in Vietnam
    The 4th Session of the Technical Commitee of APCAEM, February 10-13/2009, Chiang Rai, Thailand FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IN VIETNAM Represent by: Ass. Dr. Tran Manh Hung Head of Electrical Mechanical Laboratory VILAS 019 Tel: +84 4 38686346. Fax: +84 4 38689131. Email: [email protected] Vietnam Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Post-harvest Technology (VIAEP), Vietnam Add.: 54/102,2/19/2009 Truong 5:53:17 PMChinh Rd., Dong designed Da Dist., by VILAS019Hanoi, Vietnam. 1 Email: [email protected] An Overview I. INTRODUCTION II. REQUIERMENT OF FOOD AND DAILY NUTRITION III. SITUATION OF FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IV. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY FOR INCREASING CROP V. FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE- CHALLENGES • Anticipated Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture and Food Security • Vulnerability of the poor • Advanced technology for bio-fuel production V. CONCLUSION Situation Challenge2/19/2009 5:53:17 PM designed by VILAS019 2 Policy I. INTRODUCTION • Between the 2002-04 base period and "The 2015 World Food Summit target date" for reducing the number of the world's undernourished people by half- results indicate that need a 10- percent increase in the distribution gap (the amount of food needed to raise consumption levels to nutritional requirements) and a 16- percent should jump in the number of hungry people. 2/19/2009 5:53:17 PM designed by VILAS019 3 I. INTRODUCTION (Cont.) In the world • In 2002-04, the number of hungry people in the world were 639 millions, slightly decline (7 percent) compared to period 1992-94 that about 688 millions.
    [Show full text]
  • W Orking Paper
    Benefits and costs of climate change mitigation technologies in paddy rice r Focus on Bangladesh and Vietnam Working Paper No. 160 ape CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, P Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) Rishi Basak ing k r o W Benefits and costs of climate change mitigation technologies in paddy rice Focus on Bangladesh and Vietnam Working Paper No. 160 CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) Rishi Basak 1 Correct citation: Basak R. 2016. Benefits and costs of climate change mitigation technologies in paddy rice: Focus on Bangladesh and Vietnam. CCAFS Working Paper no. 160. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org Titles in this Working Paper series aim to disseminate interim climate change, agriculture and food security research and practices and stimulate feedback from the scientific community. The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) is a strategic partnership of CGIAR and Future Earth, led by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). The Program is carried out with funding by CGIAR Fund Donors, the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA), Australian Government (ACIAR), Irish Aid, Environment Canada, Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Netherlands, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical (IICT), UK Aid, Government of Russia, the European Union (EU), New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, with technical support from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Contact: CCAFS Coordinating Unit - Faculty of Science, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 21, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Sustainability of Irrigation Projects in Kibwezi Sub-County, Makueni County-Kenya
    FACTORS INFLUENCING SUSTAINABILITY OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS IN KIBWEZI SUB-COUNTY, MAKUENI COUNTY-KENYA DANIEL C. M. MASYA RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. 2016 DECLARATION This research project is my original work and has not been presented to any university or any other institution for any academic award. _____________________________ __________________________ Signature Date Daniel C.M Masya. Reg. No. L50/76988/2014 This research project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the university supervisor. _____________________________ __________________________ Signature Date Mr. Nebart O. Avutswa Lecturer University of Nairobi School of Continuing and Distance Education ii DEDICATION This research project is dedicated to my wife Regina, sons Michael, Peter and daughter Cecilia for the moral support they have offered me to ensure I complete the course. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First I thank God for giving me good health that has enabled me complete the research project. I am greatly indebted to my supervisor Mr. Nebart O. Avutswa, Lecturer in the University of Nairobi, School of continuing and Distant Education for continuous technical guidance, support and for reviewing the research project. I would like to acknowledge the University of Nairobi for giving me an opportunity to widen my academic boundaries through a master‟s degree program. I want also to thank my Lecturers for their kind assistance during the time I spent at the University. Many thanks go to employees of University of Nairobi, Machakos Extra mural center for their support with valuable information during my study which has greatly enabled me complete my research.
    [Show full text]