DOCSLIB.ORG

Hyampom Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hyampom Watershed Watershed Analysis Hyampom Watershed Shasta-Trinity National Forest South Fork Management Unit April 2011 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 The Purpose of Watershed Analysis ........................................................................................................... 1 Focus of this Watershed Analysis ................................................................................................................ 1 Format of the Document .............................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 - WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS ............................................ 3 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Climate ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Terrestrial................................................................................................................................................... 5 Soils ..........................................................................................................................................................23 Geology ....................................................................................................................................................26 Aquatic Systems .......................................................................................................................................30 Management Direction and Land Allocations ..........................................................................................36 Human Uses ..............................................................................................................................................40 Heritage ....................................................................................................................................................49 CHAPTER 2 - ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS ................................................ 52 Issue #1: Forest Health ................................................................................................................................52 Issue #2: Aquatic Systems ...........................................................................................................................52 Issue #3: Erosional Processes ......................................................................................................................53 Issue #4: Fire and Fuels ..............................................................................................................................54 Issue #5: Human Uses and Values ..............................................................................................................54 Issue #6: Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat and Species ...................................................................................54 CHAPTER 3 - CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 56 Issue #1: Forest Health ................................................................................................................................56 i Issue #2: Aquatic Systems ...........................................................................................................................60 Issue #3: Erosional Processes ......................................................................................................................80 Issue #4: Fire and Fuels ..............................................................................................................................90 Issue #5: Human Uses and Values ..............................................................................................................99 Issue #6: Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat and Species .................................................................................101 CHAPTER 4 - DESIRED CONDITIONS ........................................................... 107 Issue #1: Forest Health ..............................................................................................................................107 Issue #2: Aquatic Systems .........................................................................................................................108 Fisheries ..................................................................................................................................................108 Hydrology ...............................................................................................................................................109 Issue #3: Erosional Processes ....................................................................................................................110 Issue #4: Fire and Fuels ............................................................................................................................110 Issue #5: Human Uses and Values ............................................................................................................111 Issue #6: Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat and Species .................................................................................112 CHAPTER 5 - MANAGEMENT OPTIONS TO MEET DESIRED CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 113 Issue #1: Forest Health ..............................................................................................................................113 Issue #2: Aquatic Systems .........................................................................................................................115 Fisheries ..................................................................................................................................................115 Hydrology ...............................................................................................................................................116 Issue #3: Erosional Processes ....................................................................................................................117 Issue #4: Fire and Fuels ............................................................................................................................117 Issue #5: Human Uses and Values ............................................................................................................118 Issue #6: Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat and Species .................................................................................119 REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 120 ii South Fork Management Unit, Shasta-Trinity National Forest Watershed Analysis Hyampom Watershed – April 2011 Introduction The Purpose of Watershed Analysis Watershed analysis (WA) provides a systematic way to organize and understand ecosystem information by characterizing the human, aquatic, riparian, and terrestrial features, conditions, processes, and interactions (collectively referred to as “ecosystem elements”) within a watershed. As a result, the WA improves our ability to estimate the direct, indirect and cumulative effects our management actions may have on ecosystem elements, as well as guide the general type, location and sequence of appropriate management activities within the watershed. Watershed analysis is required in Key Watersheds, for roadless areas in non-Key Watersheds and Riparian Reserves prior to determining how proposed land management activities meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy objectives (Shasta-Trinity Land Resource Management Plan [Forest Plan] pg 4- 53). This landscape analysis is not a decision document; its purpose is to provide guidance and recommendations for land management. This analysis will focus on collecting and compiling information within the watershed that is essential for making sound management decisions. The landscape analysis provides existing condition information to enable identification and prioritization of appropriate project opportunities that would enhance, maintain, or improve the landscape conditions in order to achieve or move toward the desired conditions of the land allocations described in the Forest Plan. Focus of this Watershed Analysis The focus of the Hyampom WA is watershed function and vegetative condition as they relate to water quality and fisheries; wildlife habitat; forest health, fuel continuity, fuel loading and the potential for extreme fire behavior. The WA will illustrate the current conditions as well as the desired conditions described in the Forest Plan for the Shasta- Trinity National Forest (the Forest). This analysis will focus on lands within the Hyampom watershed that are administered by the Forest. Format of the Document This document is divided into five chapters. Chapter 1 Watershed Characterization The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief overview of the physical setting within the watershed, and to identify, map and describe the most important land allocations and plan objectives that influence management within the watershed. 1 - South Fork Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Temperatures in the South Fork Trinity River Watershed in Northern California
    Water Temperatures in the South Fork Trinity River Watershed in Northern California PREPARED FOR: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board for their consideration during the development of the South Fork Trinity River TMDL. PREPARED BY: Stuart Farber Timber Products Company Mt. Shasta, California Darrel Rankin USFS - Shasta Trinity National Forest Redding, California Tim Viel Natural Resource Conservation Service Weaverville, California October 1, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 GEOGRAPHIC RANGE ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 LANDSCAPE VEGETATION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Klamath Mountains Geology, California and Oregon
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology, California and Oregon, listing authors from Aalto to Zucca for the years 1849 to mid-1995 Compiled by William P. Irwin Menlo Park, California Open-File Report 95-558 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. PREFACE This bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology was begun, although not in a systematic or comprehensive way, when, in 1953, I was assigned the task of preparing a report on the geology and mineral resources of the drainage basins of the Trinity, Klamath, and Eel Rivers in northwestern California. During the following 40 or more years, I maintained an active interest in the Klamath Mountains region and continued to collect bibliographic references to the various reports and maps of Klamath geology that came to my attention. When I retired in 1989 and became a Geologist Emeritus with the Geological Survey, I had a large amount of bibliographic material in my files. Believing that a comprehensive bibliography of a region is a valuable research tool, I have expended substantial effort to make this bibliography of the Klamath Mountains as complete as is reasonably feasible. My aim was to include all published reports and maps that pertain primarily to the Klamath Mountains, as well as all pertinent doctoral and master's theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Hispidula, Gasquet Manzanita
    Conservation Assessment for Gasquet Manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) Within the State of Oregon Photo by Clint Emerson March 2010 U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Author CLINT EMERSON is a botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Gold Beach and Powers Ranger District, Gold Beach, OR 97465 TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer 3 Executive Summary 3 List of Tables and Figures 5 I. Introduction 6 A. Goal 6 B. Scope 6 C. Management Status 7 II. Classification and Description 8 A. Nomenclature and Taxonomy 8 B. Species Description 9 C. Regional Differences 9 D. Similar Species 10 III. Biology and Ecology 14 A. Life History and Reproductive Biology 14 B. Range, Distribution, and Abundance 16 C. Population Trends and Demography 19 D. Habitat 21 E. Ecological Considerations 25 IV. Conservation 26 A. Conservation Threats 26 B. Conservation Status 28 C. Known Management Approaches 32 D. Management Considerations 33 V. Research, Inventory, and Monitoring Opportunities 35 Definitions of Terms Used (Glossary) 39 Acknowledgements 41 References 42 Appendix A. Table of Known Sites in Oregon 45 2 Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile existing published and unpublished information for the rare vascular plant Gasquet manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) as well as include observational field data gathered during the 2008 field season. This Assessment does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service (Region 6) or Oregon/Washington BLM. Although the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Final CESA NC Summer Steelhead Petition
    FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER Working for the recovery of our Wild & Scenic River, its fisheries and communities. Friday, September 28, 2018 California Fish and Game Commission P.O. Box 944209 Sacramento, CA 94244-2090 Dear Commissioners, This is a petition to list Northern California summer steelhead under the California Endangered Species Act, (CESA, FGC § 2050 et seq.), as an endangered species. Under CESA, “Endangered species” means a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant which is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of its range due to one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation, competition, or disease. (F&GC § 2062) Northern California summer steelhead (NC summer steelhead) are a native subspecies of fish in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all of its range due to causes including loss of habitat and change in habitat. These extraordinary fish are superlative in many ways. They include the largest adult steelhead, as well as fish capable of handling the highest water velocities and of jumping the highest barriers of any salmonids. NC summer steelhead include the southernmost summer steelhead. They are able to tolerate water temperatures higher than any other anadromous salmonids. In their recent comprehensive review of the status and threats to salmonids in California, Moyle et al assessed the status of NC summer steelhead as being of Critical Concern, with a Status Score of 1.9 out of 5.0: Northern California (NC) summer steelhead are in long-term decline and this trend will continue without substantial human intervention on a broad scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Arceuthobium Tsugense Subsp. Amabilae, a New Subspecies of Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe (Viscaceae) from Oregon
    Arceuthobium tsugense subsp. amabilae, a New Subspecies of Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe (Viscaceae) from Oregon Robert L. Mathiasen School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, U.S.A. [email protected] Carolyn M. Daugherty Department of Geography, Planning, and Recreation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, U.S.A. ABSTRACT . The dwarf mistletoe severely parasitizing Hawksworth and Wiens (1972) only included white fir Pacific silver fir in Oregon is described as a new (Abies concolor Lindley & Gordon), grand fir (Abies subspecies of hemlock dwarf mistletoe. This classifi grandis (Douglas ex D. Don) Lindley), California red cation is based on morphological and host range fir (Abies magnifica A. Murray), and noble fir (Abies differences between hemlock dwarf mistletoe, Ar procera Rehder) as hosts of Arceuthobium abietinum in ceuthobium tsugense (Rosendahl) G. N. Jones subsp. Oregon; they included only grand fir in Washington. tsugense, and the new subspecies, Pacific silver fir Hawksworth (1987) summarized the taxonomy of dwarf mistletoe, Arceuthobium tsugense subsp. am Arceuthobium tsugense and separated this species into abilae Mathiasen & C. Daugherty. three different races: a western hemlock race, a shore Key words: Arceuthobium, Hemlock dwarf mis pine race, and a mountain hemlock race. Hawksworth tletoe, IUCN Red List, mountain hemlock, noble fir, indicated that only the western hemlock race Oregon, Pacific silver fir, Viscaceae, western hem parasitized species of Abies. Hawksworth et al. lock. (1992) presented another interpretation for the classification of A. tsugense. They described the The taxonomic classification of the dwarf mistletoes western hemlock and mountain hemlock races pro severely parasitizing Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis posed by Hawksworth (1987) as subspecies of A.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 Trinity River Fish and Wildlife Background
    TRINITY RIVER FLOW EVALUATION - FINAL REPORT CHAPTER 3 Trinity River The life histories of anadromous species have two Fish and Wildlife distinct phases, one in freshwater and the other in salt Background water. Newly hatched young remain in the river of their birth for months to years before migrating to the ocean to grow to their adult size. Adult salmonids 3.1 Fish Resources return from the ocean to their natal rivers to spawn. Although steelhead, coho salmon, and chinook salmon Commercial, Tribal, and sport fisheries depend on healthy require similar instream habitats for spawning, egg populations of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), coho incubation, and salmon (O. kisutch), and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). rearing, the The following sections describe the habitat requirements Commercial, Tribal, and timing of their and life histories of these fish species and document their sport fisheries depend on life history decline. Any recommended measures to restore and healthy populations of events varies maintain the Trinity River fishery resources must consider steelhead (Oncorhynchus (Figure 3.1). these life histories and habitat requirements. mykiss), coho salmon Published values (O. kisutch), and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). 13 CHAPTER 3: TRINITY RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE BACKGROUND JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC Chinook Spring-run Chinook Fall-run Chinook Adult Coho Coho Migration and Holding Steelhead Summer-run Steelhead Fall-run Steelhead Winter-run Steelhead Steelhead Half pounders Steelhead Steelhead Chinook Spring-run Chinook Fall-run Chinook Spawning Coho Coho Coho Steelhead All runs Steelhead Chinook Chinook Chinook Egg incubation Coho Coho Coho Steelhead Steelhead Chinook Chinook Fry Emergence Coho Coho Steelhead Steelhead Chinook Chinook Coho Juvenile age 0 Coho Rearing age 1 Coho Steelhead age 0 Steelhead age 1, age 2 Steelhead Chinook Chinook Smolt Out- Coho Coho migration Steelhead Steelhead * A small percentage of chinook in the Trinity River overwinter and outmigrate at age 1, similar to coho age 1 life history.
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTIFICATION for SUBSPECIES in ARCEUTHOBIUM CAMPYLOPODUM (VISCACEAE) ABSTRACT in the Dwarf Mistletoes
    Nickrent, D.L. 2012. Justification for subspecies in Arceuthobium campylopodum (Viscaceae). Phytoneuron 2012-51: 1–11. Published 23 May. ISSN 2153 733X JUSTIFICATION FOR SUBSPECIES IN ARCEUTHOBIUM CAMPYLOPODUM (VISCACEAE) DANIEL L. NICKRENT Department of Plant Biology Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois 62901-6509 [email protected] ABSTRACT In the dwarf mistletoes ( Arceuthobium , Viscaceae), sect. Campylopoda was previously considered to include entities treated at the rank of species: A. abietinum, A. apachecum, A. blumeri, A. californicum, A. campylopodum , A. cyanocarpum, A. laricis, A. littorum, A. microcarpum, A. monticola , A. occidentale , A. siskiyouense , and A. tsugense . Morphology, host associations, levels of sympatry and genetic evidence are reviewed here and, in contrast, it is concluded that these taxa are best viewed as ecotypes of a single variable species. Formal nomenclature treating these taxa at the rank of subspecies is presented, following previous conventions for recognizing infraspecific taxa in dwarf mistletoes. KEY WORDS : Arceuthobium campylopodum , dwarf mistletoe, ecotype, subspecies, Viscaceae Arceuthobium (dwarf mistletoes, Viscaceae) has been of great interest to American plant morphologists, pathologists, and systematists since the late 1800s. This is the only genus in Viscaceae that naturally occurs in both the Old and New World. In contrast to most viscaceous mistletoes such as Viscum and Phoradendron , Arceuthobium is morphologically reduced with scale leaves (squamate habit) and small monochlamydeous flowers whose morphology varies little between species. The explosively dehiscent fruits are unique in the family and allow population expansion without requiring bird vectors. The adult shoots produce only a small amount of carbohydrate through photosynthesis, thus these mistletoes approach the holoparasitic condition (Nickrent & García 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • For the South Fork Trinity River Watershed
    BENTHIC INDEX OF BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY (B-IBI) FOR THE SOUTH FORK TRINITY RIVER WATERSHED By Julia Lynn Remmenga Everta A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Biological Sciences December, 2006 BENTHIC INDEX OF BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY (B-IBI) FOR THE SOUTH FORK TRINITY RIVER WATERSHED by Julia Lynn Remmenga Everta Approved by the Master's Thesis Committee: Michael A. Camann, Major Professor Date Sean F. Craig, Committee Member Date Frank J. Shaughnessy, Committee Member Date William L. Bigg, Committee Member Date Michael R. Mesler, Graduate Coordinator Date Chris Hopper, Dean for Research and Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT Benthic Index of Biological Integrity (B-IBI) for the South Fork Trinity River Watershed Julia Lynn Remmenga Everta The South Fork Trinity River is an undammed river in Northern California that drains a watershed with a long history of varied anthropogenic uses including mining, logging, cattle grazing, and associated road construction. These activities modify riparian and aquatic habitats by contributing sediment to rivers and altering basic environmental processes on a watershed scale. Aquatic biota respond to and integrate the effects of anthropogenic habitat alterations, many of which are generally not detected by chemical toxicity tests. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) is charged with fulfilling the mandates of the Clean Water Act of 1972, which are to maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of surface waters. Indexes that use biotic indicators of stream health, such as the Benthic Index of Biological Integrity (B- IBI), meet these goals of the US EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon, Based on GLO
    HISTORICAL VEGETATION OF CENTRAL SOUTHWEST OREGON, BASED ON GLO SURVEY NOTES Final Report to USDI BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Medford District October 31, 2011 By O. Eugene Hickman and John A. Christy Consulting Rangeland Ecologist Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Retired, USDA - NRCS Portland State University 61851 Dobbin Road PSU – INR, P.O. Box 751 Bend, Oregon 97702 Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 (541, 312-2512) (503, 725-9953) [email protected] [email protected] Suggested citation: Hickman, O. Eugene and John A. Christy. 2011. Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon Based on GLO Survey Notes. Final Report to USDI Bureau of Land Management. Medford District, Oregon. 124 pp. ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 SW OREGON PRE-GLO SURVEY HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 7 THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE, ITS FUNCTION AND HISTORY...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identificación, Distribución Y Control De Muérdago Enano (Arceuthobium
    Identificación, distribución y control de muérdago enano (Arceuthobium spp.) en bosques de coníferas Ernesto González Gaona, Candelario Serrano Gómez, Karla Vanessa de Lira Ramos, Sergio Quiñonez Barraza, Guillermo Sánchez Martínez, Ivón López Pérez, Roberto Sánchez Lucio Centro de Investigación Regional Norte Centro Campo Experimental Pabellón Pabellón de Arteaga, Ags. Diciembre de 2017 Folleto Técnico Núm. 75 ISBN: 978-607-37-0878-4 SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA, DESARROLLO RURAL, PESCA Y ALIMENTACIÓN M.A. José Eduardo Calzada Rovirosa Secretario Lic. Jorge Armando Narváez Narváez Subsecretario de Agricultura M.C. Mely Romero Celis Subsecretario de Desarrollo Rural M.C. Ricardo Aguilar Castillo Subsecretario de Alimentación y Competitividad INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES, AGRÍCOLAS Y PECUARIAS Dr. Rafael Ambriz Cervantes Encargado del Despacho del INIFAP Dr. Raúl Gerardo Obando Rodríguez Coordinador de Investigación, Innovación y Vinculación M.C. Jorge Fajardo Guel Coordinador de Planeación y Desarrollo Mtro. Eduardo Francisco Berterame Barquín Coordinador de Administración y Sistemas CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN REGIONAL NORTE-CENTRO Dr. Arturo Daniel Tijerina Chávez Director Regional Dr. Francisco Javier Pastor López Director de Investigación Ing. Ricardo Carrillo Monsiváis Director de Administración Dr. Alfonso Peña Ramos Director de Coordinación y Vinculación en Aguascalientes Identificación, distribución y control de muérdago enano (Arceuthobium spp.) en bosques de coníferas Ernesto González Gaona1 Candelario
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Photos Susan Mcdougall Arctostaphylos Andersonii
    Arctostaphylos photos Susan McDougall Arctostaphylos andersonii Santa Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos auriculata Mount Diablo Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. bakeri Baker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. sublaevis The Cedars Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. canescens Hoary Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. sonomensis Sonoma Canescent Manzanita Arctostaphylos catalinae Catalina Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos columbiana Columbia Manzanita Arctostaphylos confertiflora Santa Rosa Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crinita Crinite Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crustacea Brittleleaf Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. rosei Rose's Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. subcordata Santa Cruz Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos cruzensis Arroyo De La Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos densiflora Vine Hill Manzanita Arctostaphylos edmundsii Little Sur Manzanita Arctostaphylos franciscana Franciscan Manzanita Arctostaphylos gabilanensis Gabilan Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. adamsii Adam's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crassifolia Del Mar Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. cushingiana Cushing's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. glandulosa Eastwood Manzanita Arctostaphylos glauca Big berry Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hearstiorum Hearst's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hookeri Hooker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hooveri Hoover’s Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. howellii Howell's Manzanita Arctostaphylos insularis Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos luciana
    [Show full text]
  • Gottlieb Garden Plants
    GOTTLIEB GARDEN Native Plants # Botanical Name Common Name Current SHRUBS 1 Abutilon palmeri Palmer's Indian Mallow (Yellow) 2 Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow - White and 'Island Pink' Yarrow 3 Acmispon glaber var. glaber (fka Lotus scoparius) Common Deerweed, California Broom, Deervetch 4 Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise 5 Adenostoma fasciculatum 'Nicolas" Nicolas Chamise 6 Agave desertii Desert Agave, Century Plant 7 Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa or Lizard Tail 8 Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine 9 Arabis blepharophylla 'Spring Charm' Rock Cress 10 Archostaphylos 'Winterglow' Winterglow Manzanita 11 Arctostaphylos bakeri Baker's 'Louis Edmunds' Manzanita 12 Arctostaphylos densiflora Vine Hill Mananita 13 Arctostaphylos hookeri Hooker's Manzanita 14 Arctostaphylos 'John Dourley' John Dourley Manzanita 15 Arctostaphylos pajaroensis Pajaro (Paradise) Manzanita 16 Arctostaphylos patula Greenleaf (Bigleaf) Manzanita 17 Arctostaphylos refugioensis Refugio Manzanita 18 Aristida purpurea var. purpurea Purple Threeawn 19 Aristolochia californica California Dutchman's Pipe No 20 Artemesia californica California Sagebrush 'Canyon Grey' 21 Artemesia pycnocephala California Sandhill Sagebrush 'David's Choice', Coastal Sagewort 22 Asclepias fascicularis Narrow-leaf Milkweed No 23 Asclepias speciosa Showy Milkweed 24 Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Quail or Salt Bush 25 Baccharis pilularis ssp. consanguinea Coyote Brush/Chaparral Broom 1356 Laurel Way, Beverly Hills Page 1 of 11 05/17/17 GOTTLIEB GARDEN Native Plants # Botanical Name Common
    [Show full text]