Post-Emergence Development of Male Genitalia in Schistocerca Americana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post-Emergence Development of Male Genitalia in Schistocerca Americana Copyright by Hojun Song 2002 ABSTRACT Post-emergence development of male genitalia in Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Cyrtacanthacridinae) was studied. The present study demonstrates for the first time that the internal skeletal structures in the male genitalia continue to develop after the adult emergence. Also, the taxonomic use of the genitalic characters is reevaluated. An experiment was set up to examine the developmental patterns in the male genitalia and female ovipositor. The mechanism of the genitalic apodeme development is explained by the resilin deposition possibly affected by bursicon secretion. Overall, the structures affected by the cuticle deposition are the apodemes providing muscle attachment sites that enable the necessary movement during copulation. Non-changing structures in the genitalia may be directly involved in the internal courtship during copulation. Therefore, sexually immature individuals can be considered functionally incapable of copulation because the necessary structures have not been fully matured. In order to test if the post-emergence development is widespread, the different aged specimens of Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål) and Locusta migratoria (Linnaeus) were studied. Although the morphology was different between Schistocerca and Locusta, the overall developmental patterns were similar. The sexual maturation period of Schistocerca takes at least 30 days after the emergence. The life history theory predicts that the age at maturity is shaped by the trade-off between survival and reproduction. In Schistocerca, the structures associated with the flight mature earlier in adult development whereas the genitalia continue to develop for about thirty days after emergence. Delayed maturation is well explained by the life history theory when considering that the flight may be the most important trait for survival and that the reproduction is usually costly. A morphological phylogeny of the North American Schistocerca is proposed for the first time. The monophyly of the alutacea complex sensu Dirsh is not supported. I argue that the previous subspecies of S. alutacea are morphologically distinct species. The origin of S. gregaria and the evolution of swarming behavior are briefly discussed in the light of the present phylogenetic hypothesis. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisers, Norm Johnson and John Wenzel, for intellectual support and encouragement, which made this thesis possible, and for their patience in correcting both my stylistic and scientific errors. I also wish to thank Hans Klompen for his valuable criticism on the earlier draft. I thank Greg Sword (USDA ARS Sidney, MT) for allowing me to work at the USDA facility. The enthusiasm for the mysterious Schistocerca that we share will someday result in a fruitful way. Also, my thanks go out to Reg Chapman (University of Arizona) for his constant encouragement and helpful suggestions on our "Schisto Problem." I am grateful to Ted Cohn (University of Michigan) for introducing me to the study of genitalia. His great insight and humor are always appreciated. I also wish to thank Steve Simpson and Stephen Roberts (University of Oxford) for generously providing locust specimens. Some of the ideas in the thesis came from lengthy, but friendly discussions with my fellow graduate students, especially, Marc Branham, Eric Dotseth, and Kurt Pickett. Finally, I wish to thank my parents, Young-Gil Song and Jee-Y eon Koo, and my brother Wonjun, for enduring my whining and for giving moral support. I am also grateful to my soulmate, Haeran Park, for always believing in me. lV VITA March 31, 1977 . Born - Seoul, Korea 2000 ..................................... B.S. Entomology, Cornell University. 2000 -present .......................... Graduate Teaching and Research Associate, The Ohio State University FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Entomology v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... ii ACKN"OWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. iv VITA ............................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... x CHAPTERS: 1. LITERATUREREVIEW ........................................................................................... l 1.1. POST-EMERGENCE DEVELOPMENT IN SCHISTOCERCA .................... 2 1.1. 1. Cuticular development .................................................................... 2 1.1.2. Muscular development. ................................................................... 4 1.1. 3. Ultrastructural development ............................................................ 5 1.1.4. Role of endocrine system during development ................................ 6 1.1.5. Summary ........................................................................................ 7 1.2. EVOLUTION OF LIFE HISTORIES IN SCHISTOCERCA .......................... 9 1.2.1. Biology of Schistocerca .................................................................. 9 1.2.2. Evolution of age at maturity .......................................................... 11 1.2.3. Summary ...................................................................................... 15 1.3. TAXONOMIC USE OF GENITALIC CHARACTERS .............................. 16 1. 3 .1. History of internal genitalia use in Orthoptera ............................... 17 1.3 .2. Variability of male genitalia .......................................................... 19 1.3.3. Male genitalia vs. female genitalia ................................................ 21 1.3.4. Evolution of male genitalia ........................................................... 22 1.3.5. Summary ...................................................................................... 24 V1 2. EXPERIMENTS ...................................................................................................... 25 2.1. SCHISTOCERCA AMERICANA GENITALIA ............................................ 25 2.1.1. Endophallus .................................................................................. 26 2.1.2. Ectophallus ................................................................................... 26 2.1.3. Epiphallus ..................................................................................... 27 2.1.4. Ovipositor..................................................................................... 27 2.2. FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF MALE GENITALIA ....................... 33 2.3. MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................. 35 2.3.1. Rearing ......................................................................................... 35 2.3.2. Dissection and Data collection ...................................................... 36 2.3.3. Statistical Analysis ....................................................................... 41 2.4. RESULTS ................................................................................................... 42 2.4.1. Developmental sequence of the phallic complex .......................... .42 2.4.2. Rate of development ..................................................................... 44 2.4.3. Post-emergence development of male genitalia in other species .... 61 2.5. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................. 67 2.5.1 Development of genitalia and benefit of delayed maturation .......... 67 2.5.2. Similarities and differences in developmental patterns .................. 72 2.5.3. Taxonomic implication of genitalia development .......................... 74 3. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 76 3.1. TAXONOMIC REVIEW ............................................................................ 77 3.2. BIOGEOGRAPHY ..................................................................................... 81 3.3. SWARMING BEHAVIOR AND PHASE POLYMORPHISM ................... 85 3.4. CLADISTIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 90 3.4.1. Tax.a ............................................................................................. 90 3.4.2. Characters ..................................................................................... 90 3.4.3. Character coding andAnalysis ...................................................... 91 3.4.4. Results .......................................................................................... 91 3.5. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................. 93 3.5.1. Taxonomic implication ................................................................. 93 3.5.2. Biogeographical implication ......................................................... 95 3.5.3. Evolutionary implication .............................................................. 99 Vll APPENDIX ................................................................................................................. 101 Appendix A Data matrix ..................................................................... 101 Appendix A Data matrix (cont'd)
Recommended publications
  • The Acridiidae of Minnesota
    Wqt 1lluitttr11ity nf :!alliuur11nta AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 141 TECHNICAL THE ACRIDIIDAE OF MINNESOTA BY M. P. SOMES DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY FARM, ST. PAUL. JULY 1914 THE UNIVERSlTY OF l\ll.'\1\ESOTA THE 130ARD OF REGENTS The Hon. B. F. :.JELsox, '\finneapolis, President of the Board - 1916 GEORGE EDGAR VINCENT, Minneapolis Ex Officio The President of the l.:niversity The Hon. ADOLPH 0. EBERHART, Mankato Ex Officio The Governor of the State The Hon. C. G. ScnuLZ, St. Paul l'.x Oflicio The Superintendent of Education The Hon. A. E. RICE, \Villmar 191.3 The Hon. CH.\RLES L. Sol\DfERS, St. Paul - 1915 The Hon. PIERCE Bun.ER, St. Paul 1916 The Hon. FRED B. SNYDER, Minneapolis 1916 The Hon. W. J. J\Lwo, Rochester 1919 The Hon. MILTON M. \NILLIAMS, Little Falls 1919 The Hon. }OIIN G. vVILLIAMS, Duluth 1920 The Hon. GEORGE H. PARTRIDGE, Minneapolis 1920 Tl-IE AGRICULTURAL C0:\1MITTEE The Hon. A. E. RrCE, Chairman The Hon. MILTON M. vVILLIAMS The Hon. C. G. SCHULZ President GEORGE E. VINCENT The Hon. JoHN G. \VrLLIAMS STATION STAFF A. F. VlooDs, M.A., D.Agr., Director J. 0. RANKIN, M.A.. Editor HARRIET 'vV. SEWALL, B.A., Librarian T. J. HORTON, Photographer T. L.' HAECKER, Dairy and Animal Husbandman M. H. REYNOLDS, B.S.A., M.D., D.V.:'d., Veterinarian ANDREW Boss, Agriculturist F. L. WASHBURN, M.A., Entomologist E. M. FREEMAN, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist and Botanist JonN T. STEWART, C.E., Agricultural Engineer R. W. THATCHER, M.A., Agricultural Chemist F. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Vision in Band-Winged Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae)
    Spatial vision in band-winged grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae) A Senior Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Organismal Biology and Ecology, Colorado College By Alexander B. Duncan Bachelor of Arts Degree in Organismal Biology and Ecology May, 2017 Approved by: _________________________________________ Dr. Nicholas Brandley Primary Thesis Advisor ________________________________________ Dr. Emilie Gray Secondary Thesis Advisor ABSTRACT Visual acuity, the ability to resolve fine spatial details, can vary dramatically between and within insect species. Body-size, sex, behavior, and ecological niche are all factors that may influence an insect’s acuity. Band-winged grasshoppers (Oedipodinae) are a subfamily of grasshoppers characterized by their colorfully patterned hindwings. Although researchers have anecdotally suggested that this color pattern may attract mates, few studies have examined the visual acuity of these animals, and none have examined its implications on intraspecific signaling. Here, we compare the visual acuity of three bandwing species: Dissosteira carolina, Arphia pseudonietana, and Spharagemon equale. To measure acuity in these species we used a modified radius of curvature estimation (RCE) technique. Visual acuity was significantly coarser 1) in males compared to females, 2) parallel to the horizon compared to the perpendicular, and 3) in S. equale compared to other bandwings. Unlike many insect families, body size within a species did not correlate with visual acuity. To examine the functional implications of these results, we modeled the appearance of different bandwing patterns to conspecifics. These results suggest that hind- wing patterning could only be used as a signal to conspecifics at short distances (<50cm). This study furthers the exploration of behavior and the evolution of visual systems in bandwings.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES in LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 10, No 4, 2021, 105 – 115 2277-663X (P) SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES IN LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D. Rech1*, Brianda Alirez2 and Lauren Paulk2 1Western New Mexico University, Deming, New Mexico 2Early College High School, Deming, New Mexico E-mail: [email protected] (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: The Chihuahua Desert is the largest hot desert (BWh) in North America. Orthopterans are an integral part of desert ecosystems. They include grasshoppers, katydids and crickets. A large section of the Northern Chihuahua Desert is in Luna County, New Mexico. There is a dearth of information on the Orthopterans in this area. Between May and October of 2020, sixty adult grasshoppers, two katydids and one camel cricket were captured from a 5-hectare (ha) area at base of the Florida Mountains, which is the extreme southern portion of Luna County. Luna County was in a severe drought during 2020. The insects were identified using several taxonomic keys (Cigliano, Braun, Eades & Otte, 2018; Guala & Doring, 2019; Triplehorn & Johnson, 2005; Richman, Lightfoot, Sutherland & Fergurson, 1993, Otte, 1984, 1981; Tinkham, 1944). A previous New Mexico State University (NMSU) survey from 1993 had only documented grasshoppers in the Acrididae and Romaleidae families. The objective of this continuing study is to identify and document all species of Orthopterans found in Luna County, and correlate the populations with changing weather patterns. In this portion of the study, the majority of Orthopterans captured were Leprus wheeleri (Thomas), a previously documented specie. However, seven undocumented species were also captured.
    [Show full text]
  • To Be Or Not to Be a Locust? a Comparative Analysis of Behavioral Phase Change in Nymphs of Schistocerca Americana and S
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2003 To be or not to be a locust? A comparative analysis of behavioral phase change in nymphs of Schistocerca americana and S. gregaria Gregory A. Sword United States Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Sword, Gregory A., "To be or not to be a locust? A comparative analysis of behavioral phase change in nymphs of Schistocerca americana and S. gregaria" (2003). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 381. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/381 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Insect Physiology 49 (2003) 709–717 www.elsevier.com/locate/jinsphys To be or not to be a locust? A comparative analysis of behavioral phase change in nymphs of Schistocerca americana and S. gregaria Gregory A. Sword ∗ United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1500 N. Central Avenue, Sidney, MT 59270, USA Received 4 December 2002; received in revised form 28 March 2003; accepted 2 April 2003 Abstract Phenotypic plasticity in behavior induced by high rearing density is often part of a migratory syndrome in insects called phase polyphen- ism. Among locust species, swarming and the expression of phase polyphenism are highly correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Short Horn Grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon
    AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY JOURNAL OF NORTH AMERICA ISSN Print: 2151-7517, ISSN Online: 2151-7525, doi:10.5251/abjna.2013.4.3.291.299 © 2013, ScienceHuβ, http://www.scihub.org/ABJNA An inventory of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division, West Region of Cameroon Seino RA1, Dongmo TI1, Ghogomu RT2, Kekeunou S3, Chifon RN1, Manjeli Y4 1Laboratory of Applied Ecology (LABEA), Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 353 Dschang, Cameroon, 2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. 3 Département de Biologie et Physiologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Yaoundé 1, Cameroun 4 Department of Biotechnology and Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Agronomic Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, P.O. Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. ABSTRACT The present study was carried out as a first documentation of short horn grasshoppers in the Menoua Division of Cameroon. A total of 1587 specimens were collected from six sites i.e. Dschang (265), Fokoue (253), Fongo – Tongo (267), Nkong – Ni (271), Penka Michel (268) and Santchou (263). Identification of these grasshoppers showed 28 species that included 22 Acrididae and 6 Pyrgomorphidae. The Acrididae belonged to 8 subfamilies (Acridinae, Catantopinae, Cyrtacanthacridinae, Eyprepocnemidinae, Oedipodinae, Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae) while the Pyrgomorphidae belonged to only one subfamily (Pyrgomorphinae). The Catantopinae (Acrididae) showed the highest number of species while Oxyinae, Spathosterninae and Tropidopolinae showed only one species each. Ten Acrididae species (Acanthacris ruficornis, Anacatantops sp, Catantops melanostictus, Coryphosima stenoptera, Cyrtacanthacris aeruginosa, Eyprepocnemis noxia, Gastrimargus africanus, Heteropternis sp, Ornithacris turbida, and Trilophidia conturbata ) and one Pyrgomorphidae (Zonocerus variegatus) were collected in all the six sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Spot Animal Spot Uses Intriguing Specimens from Cincinnati Museum Center’S Collections to Teach Children How Each Animal Is Unique to Its Environment
    Animal Spot Animal Spot uses intriguing specimens from Cincinnati Museum Center’s collections to teach children how each animal is unique to its environment. Touch a cast of an elephant’s skull, feel a real dinosaur fossil, finish a three-layer fish puzzle, observe live fish and use interactives to explore how animals move, “dress” and eat. Case 1: Modes of Balance and Movement (Case design: horse legs in boots) Animals walk, run, jump, fly, and/or slither to their destination. Animals use many different parts of their bodies to help them move. The animals in this case are: • Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) • Grasshopper (Shistocerca americana) • Locust (Dissosteira carolina) • Broad-wing damselfly (Family: Calopterygidae) • King Rail (Rallus elegans) • Eastern Mole (Scalopus aquaticus) • Brown trout (Salmo trutta) • Gila monster (Heloderma suspectum) • Damselfly (Agriocnemis pygmaea) • Pufferfish (Family: Tetraodontidae) • Bullfrog (Rona catesbrana) • Cicada (Family: Cicadidae) • Moths and Butterflies (Order: Lepidoptera) • Sea slugs (Order: Chepalaspidea) • Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger) • Giant Millipede (Subspecies: Lules) Case 2: Endo/Exoskeleton (Case design: Surrounded by bones) There are many different kinds of skeletons; some inside the body and others outside. The animals with skeletons on the inside have endoskeletons. Those animals that have skeletons on the outside have exoskeletons. Endoskeletons • Hellbender salamander (Genus: Cryptobranchus) • Python (Family: Boidae) • Perch (Genus: Perca)
    [Show full text]
  • Acrididae, Gomphocerinae
    Oliveira et al. Molecular Cytogenetics 2011, 4:24 http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/4/1/24 RESEARCH Open Access Chromosomal mapping of rDNAs and H3 histone sequences in the grasshopper rhammatocerus brasiliensis (acrididae, gomphocerinae): extensive chromosomal dispersion and co-localization of 5S rDNA/H3 histone clusters in the A complement and B chromosome Nathalia L Oliveira1, Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello2, Marília F Rocha1, Vilma Loreto3, Cesar Martins4 and Rita C Moura1* Abstract Background: Supernumerary B chromosomes occur in addition to standard karyotype and have been described in about 15% of eukaryotes, being the repetitive DNAs the major component of these chromosomes, including in some cases the presence of multigene families. To advance in the understanding of chromosomal organization of multigene families and B chromosome structure and evolution, the distribution of rRNA and H3 histone genes were analyzed in the standard karyotype and B chromosome of three populations of the grasshopper Rhammatocerus brasiliensis. Results: The location of major rDNA was coincident with the previous analysis for this species. On the other hand, the 5S rDNA mapped in almost all chromosomes of the standard complement (except in the pair 11) and in the B chromosome, showing a distinct result from other populations previously analyzed. Besides the spreading of 5S rDNA in the genome of R. brasiliensis it was also observed multiple sites for H3 histone genes, being located in the same chromosomal regions of 5S rDNAs, including the presence of the H3 gene in the B chromosome. Conclusions: Due to the intense spreading of 5S rRNA and H3 histone genes in the genome of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet-Based Sodium Regulation in Sixth-Instar Grasshoppers, Schistocerca Americana (Drury) (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
    Diet-based Sodium Regulation in Sixth-Instar Grasshoppers, Schistocerca americana (Drury) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Shelby Kerrin Kilpatrick and Spencer T. Behmer Texas A&M University, Department of Entomology Edited by Benjamin Rigby and Shelby Kerrin Kilpatrick Abstract: This study analyzed sodium intake by Schistocerca americana (Drury) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) grasshoppers using three different seedling wheatgrass based diet treatments to simulate a natural food source. Sodium is a key nutrient for grasshopper cells, nerves, and reproduction. Grasshoppers acquire sodium from plants that they consume. However, it is unclear if grasshoppers self-regulate their sodium intake. Additionally, if grasshoppers self-regulate their sodium intake, the extent to which they do is uncertain. Newly molted sixth-instar grasshoppers were fed one of three diets in which the level of sodium that they had access to was varied. The S. americana grasshoppers consumed significantly less of the 0.5 M added sodium only diet when presented with an option to choose between this diet and a no-sodium-added diet (t = 9.6026, df = 7, P < 0.0001). Grasshoppers in the 0.5 M added sodium only treatment consumed a significantly lower amount of food (P < 0.0001) and gained a significantly lower mean mass (P < 0.0001), compared to the grasshoppers in the no-sodium-added only treatment. Our results generally correlated with previous studies on Locusta migratoria (L.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), and information about the ecological tolerances and nutritional requirements of grasshoppers. Our data suggests that S. americana grasshoppers are capable of self-regulating their sodium intake. Additionally, we show that high concentrations of sodium in grasshopper diets have a negative effect on body mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopteran Diversity of the Cowling Arboretum and Mcknight Prairie In
    Orthopteran Diversity of the Cowling Arboretum and McKnight Prairie in Northfield, MN Alexander Forde Elisabeth Sederberg and Mark McKone 5 McKnight Prairie Carleton College. Northfield, MN Arb Prairie 4 Restorations Results and 3 Discussion A. The 2006 Orthoptera biodiversity survey for the Cowling Arboretum and Figure 1. Examples of per trap 2 McKnight Prairie found a total of 36 unique species across both sites Orthopterans from various (Figure 3). 29 species were collected at the arboretum while 20 species were C. taxonomic groups: 1 collected at McKnight Prairie. The higher absolute species number at the Average number of subfamilies arboretum can be mostly attributed to a greater number of katydid species A. a grasshopper (Acrididae) found there compared to McKnight. This difference in katydid diversity B. a katydid (Tettigonidae) 0 makes sense, since Tettigonids prefer more forested habitats (Capinera, 2004), C. a cricket (Gryllidae) of which there are none at McKnight. The Gryllidae and Acrididae identified were more consistent between locations, in terms of the absolute number of Figure 5. Average number of species in the groups, though there were important differences in the different groups of Orthopteran particular species represented within these families. taxa (shown in Figure 4) per trap In the pitfall trap experiment, there were significantly more Gomphocerinae B. at McKnight Prairie and the (U=30, P =0.002), and Raphidophoridae (U=43, P =0.037) observed per trap arboretum prairie restorations. at McKnight (Figure 4). The average number of Oecanthinae per trap was higher for the arboretum (U=49.5, P =0.088) and the average number of Error bars represent ± standard Oedipodinae was higher for McKnight (U=54, P =0.07), though these error relationships were only marginally significant (Figure 4).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Biological Control of the Banana Pseudostem Weevil Odoiporus Longicollis (Olivier) by Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria Bassiana T
    Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 20 (2019) 101262 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bab An assessment of biological control of the banana pseudostem weevil Odoiporus longicollis (Olivier) by entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana T Alagersamy Alagesana, Balakrishnan Padmanabanb, Gunasekaran Tharania, Sundaram Jawahara, Subramanian Manivannana,c,* a PG and Research Department of Biotechnology, Bharath College of Science and Management, Thanjavur, 613 005, Tamil Nadu, India b Division of Crop Protection, National Research Centre for Banana (ICAR), Tiruchirappalli, 620 102, Tamil Nadu, India c Department of Zoology, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, 641 029, Tamil Nadu, India ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Banana (Musa sp.) is the most imperative staple food crop for all types of people worldwide, which is commonly Banana production grown in Southeast Asia. Banana plantain can be severely affected by the devastating pest Odoiporus longicollis Odoiporus longicollis that results in severe economic losses in India. Management of weevil pests using chemical methods is harmful to Beauveria bassiana the environment, and cultural methods are also partially successful. Therefore, an alternative approach of plant Bioefficacy defense mediated by endophytic fungi to control banana stem borer larvae is necessary, which could affect the Extracellular enzyme extracellular enzyme chitinase and protease. Among four isolates, Beauveria bassiana isolate KH3 is the most Phylogeny virulent entomopathogenic fungus compared with other isolates, and species identification was achieved using molecular phylogenetic characteristics. The B. bassiana isolate KH3 (1 × 108 conidia/mL-1) is more bioeffective against O. longicollis larvae, causing > 90% significant mortality in 12 and 18 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements for the Sustainable Management of Acridoids of Importance in Agriculture
    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(2), pp. 142-152, 12 January, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.912 ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 Academic Journals Review Elements for the sustainable management of acridoids of importance in agriculture María Irene Hernández-Zul 1, Juan Angel Quijano-Carranza 1, Ricardo Yañez-López 1, Irineo Torres-Pacheco 1, Ramón Guevara-Gónzalez 1, Enrique Rico-García 1, Adriana Elena Castro- Ramírez 2 and Rosalía Virginia Ocampo-Velázquez 1* 1Department of Biosystems, School of Engineering, Queretaro State University, C.U. Cerro de las Campanas, Querétaro, México. 2Department of Agroecology, Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, México. Accepted 16 December, 2011 Acridoidea is a superfamily within the Orthoptera order that comprises a group of short-horned insects commonly called grasshoppers. Grasshopper and locust species are major pests of grasslands and crops in all continents except Antarctica. Economically and historically, locusts and grasshoppers are two of the most destructive agricultural pests. The most important locust species belong to the genus Schistocerca and populate America, Africa, and Asia. Some grasshoppers considered to be important pests are the Melanoplus species, Camnula pellucida in North America, Brachystola magna and Sphenarium purpurascens in northern and central Mexico, and Oedaleus senegalensis and Zonocerus variegatus in Africa. Previous studies have classified these species based on specific characteristics. This review includes six headings. The first discusses the main species of grasshoppers and locusts; the second focuses on their worldwide distribution; the third describes their biology and life cycle; the fourth refers to climatic factors that facilitate the development of grasshoppers and locusts; the fifth discusses the action or reaction of grasshoppers and locusts to external or internal stimuli and the sixth refers to elements to design management strategies with emphasis on prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers and Locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian Territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History
    Zoology and Ecology ISSN: 2165-8005 (Print) 2165-8013 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tzec20 Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History Mohammad Abusarhan, Zuhair S. Amr, Manal Ghattas, Elias N. Handal & Mazin B. Qumsiyeh To cite this article: Mohammad Abusarhan, Zuhair S. Amr, Manal Ghattas, Elias N. Handal & Mazin B. Qumsiyeh (2017): Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History, Zoology and Ecology, DOI: 10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 Published online: 26 Apr 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tzec20 Download by: [Bethlehem University] Date: 26 April 2017, At: 04:32 ZOOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1313807 Grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Caelifera) from the Palestinian territories at the Palestine Museum of Natural History Mohammad Abusarhana, Zuhair S. Amrb, Manal Ghattasa, Elias N. Handala and Mazin B. Qumsiyeha aPalestine Museum of Natural History, Bethlehem University, Bethlehem, Palestine; bDepartment of Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY We report on the collection of grasshoppers and locusts from the Occupied Palestinian Received 25 November 2016 Territories (OPT) studied at the nascent Palestine Museum of Natural History. Three hundred Accepted 28 March 2017 and forty specimens were collected during the 2013–2016 period.
    [Show full text]