High-Hise Building Oata Base

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High-Hise Building Oata Base High-Hise Building Oata Base Since the inception of the Council, various surveys have been made con­ cerning the location, number of stories, height, material, and use of tall buildings around the world. The first report on these surveys was published in the Council's Proceedings of the First International Conference in 1972. TaU Building Systems and Concepts (Volume SC) brought that information up to date with a detailed survey in 1980. Changes to some of the data were reflected in Developments in TaU Buildings-1983, with further updating in Advances in TaU Buildings (January, 1986), High-Rise Buildings: Recent Progress (November, 1986), and TaU Build­ ings 0/ the World (February, 1987). This present volume provides the newer information more recently received. The original survey was based mainly on information collected from individuals in the major cities of the world. The main criterion for the selection of a city was generally its population. Another criterion was the availability of a Council member or other contact who might provide the needed information. This Appendix updates Table l. Because the data came from so many sourees, complete accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Buildings change names or new ones break ground, and this information is sometimes slow in reaching the Council headquarters. In this sense the survey keeps its nature as a "living document." Additions and corrections to the information presented here are welcomed, and should be brought to the attention of Council Headquarters at Lehigh University. 1003 1004 Second Century of the Skyscraper Table 1: World's TaUest Buildings. This is a list of the world's 100 tallest buildings. The information presented here includes the city in wh ich each building is located, the year of completion or "under construction" (UC) and expected year of completion, number of stories, height in meters and feet, structural material, and use of each building. Table 1 100 Tallest buildings in the world Height Year No.of Building City Comp Stories Meters Feet Material Use Sears Tower Chicago 1974 110 443 1454 Steel Office World Trade Center-North New York 1972 110 417 1368 Steel Office World Trade Center-South New York 1973 110 415 1362 Steel Office Empire State New York 1931 102 381 1250 Steel Office Bank of China HongKong UC88 72 368 1209 Mixed Office Amoco Chicago 1973 80 346 1136 Steel Office John Hancock Chicago 1968 100 344 1127 Steel Multiple Chrysler Bldg. New York 1930 77 319 1046 Steel Office Library Square Tower Los Angeles UC90 75 310 1017 Steel Office Texas Commerce Plaza Houston 1981 75 305 1002 Mixed Office Allied Bank Plaza Houston 1983 71 296 970 Steel Office 1 Wacker Drive Chicago UC90 80 295 967 Concrete Office Sll Wacker Drive Chicago UC90 65 292 959 Concrete Office Columbia Center Seattle 1985 76 291 955 Mixed Office American Intl. Bldg. New York 1931 66 290 950 Steel Office First Bank Tower Toronto 1975 72 285 935 Steel Office 40 Wall Tower New York 1966 71 283 927 Steel Office Interfirst Plaza Tower Dallas 1985 70 281 921 Mixed Office Citicorp Center New York 1977 59 2S0 919 Steel Multiple Overseas Union Bank Singapore UCS6 63 280 919 Steel Office Scotia Plaza Toronto UC88 68 275 901 Mixed Office Transco Tower Houston 19S3 64 275 901 Steel Office 900 N. Michigan Chicago UC89 67 267 875 Mixed Multiple AT&T Corp. Center Chicago UC88 64 267 875 Mixed Office Mellon Bank Philadelphia UC88 56 265 870 Mixed Office Water Tower Place Chicago 1976 74 262 859 Concrete Multiple United California Bank Los Angeles 1974 62 262 858 Steel Office Transamerica Pyramid San Francisco 1972 48 260 853 Steel Office RCA RockefeIler Center New York 1933 70 259 850 Steel Office First National Bank Chicago 1969 60 259 850 Steel Office U.S. Steel Pittsburgh 1970 64 256 841 Steel Office One Liberty Place Philadelphia UC87 60 256 840 Steel Office Atlantic Center Atlanta UC88 50 250 820 Mixed Office Cityspire New York UC87 72 248 815 Mixed Multiple One Chase Manhattan Plaza New York 1961 60 248 813 Steel Office Pan American New York 1963 59 246 80S Steel Office Momentum Place Dallas UC87 60 244 797 Steel Office Rialto Center Melbourne UC86 70 243 794 Concrete Office Woolworth Bldg. New York 1913 57 242 792 Steel Office I Palac K ultury I N auki Warsaw 1955 42 241 790 Mixed Office John Hancock Tower Boston 1973 60 241 790 Steel Office High-Rise Building Data Base 1005 Year No.of __H_e_ig::c h_t_ Building City Comp Stories Meters Feet Material Use- World Wide Plaza New York UC89 53 250 788 Steel Office M.L.C. Centre Sydney 1976 70 240 786 Concrete Office Commerce Court West Toronto 1974 52 239 784 Steel Office Republic Bank Center Houston 1983 56 238 780 Steel Office Bank of America San Francisco 1969 52 237 778 Steel Office Office Towers Caracas 1985 60 237 778 Mixed Office 3 First National Plaza Chicago 1981 58 236 775 Mixed Office I D S Center Minneapolis 1972 57 235 772 Mixed Office Norwest Center Minneapolis UC88 57 235 770 Mixed Office Singapore Treasury Bldg. Singapore 1986 52 235 770 Mixed Office One Penn Plaza New York 1972 50 234 766 Steel Office Korea Ins. Company Seoul 1985 63 233 764 Steel Office Tun Abdul Razak Penang 1985 61 232 761 Concrete Office Equitable Tower W. New York 1985 51 230 75" Steel Office Maine Montparnasse Paris 1973 64 229 751 Mixed Office Prudential Center Boston 1964 52 229 750 Steel Office Federal Reserve Bldg. Boston 1975 32 229 750 Steel Office Exxon New York 1971 54 229 750 Steel Office First International Plaza Houston 1981 55 228 748 Mixed Office Republic Plaza Denver 1983 56 227 745 Mixed Office Morgan Bank New York UC88 50 227 745 Steel Office Security Pacific National Bank I.os Angeles 1974 55 226 743 Steel Office One Liberty Plaza (U.S. Steel) New York 1972 54 226 743 Steel Office Ikebukuro Tower (Sunshine 60) Tokyo 1978 60 226 742 Steel Office Raffles City Hotel Singapore 1986 70 226 741 Concrete Hotel 20 Exchange Place (Citibank) New York 1931 55 226 741 Steel Office Crocker Center Los Angeles 1983 55 225 740 Steel Multiple Renaissance 1 Detroit 1977 73 225 739 Concrete Hotel World Financial Center New York 1985 51 225 739 Steel Office Toronto Dominion Bank Tower Toronto 1967 56 224 736 Steel Office Two Union Square Seattle UC88 56 224 736 Mixed Multiple 1600 Smith Houston 1984 55 223 732 Steel Office Southeast Financial Center Miami 1984 53 222 730 Mixed Office One Astor Plaza New York 1972 54 222 730 Mixed Office Olympia Center Chicago 1981 63 222 728 Concrete Multiple One Mellon Bank Center Pittsburgh 1983 54 222 727 Steel Office GuU Tower Houston 1982 52 221 726 Mixed Office 9 West 57th SI. New York 1974 50 221 725 Steel Office Peachtree Center Plaza Hotel Atlanta 1975 71 220 723 Concretc Hotel Carlton Centre Johannesburg 1973 50 220 722 Concrete Office Texas Commerce Tower Dallas UN87 56 219 720 Concrete Office Metropolitan Tower New York 1986 66 219 716 Concrete Multiple One Shell Plaza Houston 1971 50 218 714 Concrete Office Petro-Canada I Calgary 1983 52 217 710 Mixed Office First International Bldg. Dallas 1973 56 216 710 Steel Office Hopewell Centre Hong Kong 1981 65 216 709 Concrete Office Shinjuku Center Tokyo 1979 54 216 709 Steel Office Terminal Tower Cleveland 1930 52 216 708 Steel Office Union Carbide Bldg. New York 1960 52 215 707 Steel Office General Motors New York 1968 50 214 705 Steel Office 1006 Second Century of the Skyscraper Height Year No.of Building City Comp Stories Meters Feet Material Use Petrolaos Mexicanos Mexico City 1984 52 214 702 Steel Office American Fletcher Center Indianapolis UC89 60 214 704 Steel Office Metropolitan Life New York 1909 50 213 700 Steel Office Atlantic Richfield Plaza A Los Angeles 1972 52 212 699 Steel Office Atlantic Richfield Plaza B Los Angeles 1972 52 212 699 Steel Office One Shell Square New Orleans 1972 51 212 697 Steel Office 500 Fifth Avenue New York 1931 58 212 697 Steel Office IBM Bldg. Chicago 1973 52 212 695 Steel Office Four Allen Center Houston 1983 50 212 695 Steel Office Nomenclature GLOSSARY Accelerograph. An instrument that measures and reeords the time-history of ground acceleration at a point during an earthquake. Actions. Load and imposed or eonstrained deformations that eause stresses and deformations in struetural members. Agora. An open spaee in an ancient Greek town, used as a market and general meeting place. The forum had the same function in Roman architecture. Air-Conditioning. Artifieial ventilation with air at a eontrolled temperature and humidity. Alkai-aggregate reaction. Chemieal re action in mortar or eonerete between alkalies (sodium and potassium) from portland eement or other sources and certain eonstituents of some aggregates; under eertain conditions, deleterious expansion of the conerete or mortar may result. Allowable load. The ultimate load divided by faetor of safety. Allowable stress. Maximum permissible stress used in design of members of a strueture and based on a faetor of safety against rupture or yielding of any type. Allowable stress design or working stress design. A method of proportioning structures such that the eomputed elastie stress does not exeeed a specified limiting stress. Arcade. Strictly, a line of arehes earried on columns, either free-standing or attaehed to a wall. The term was applied during the nineteenth eentury to 1007 1008 Second Century of the Skyscraper glass-roofed shopping areas modeled on the Crystal Palace, and is now being used for passages with shops on one or both sides, irrespective of construction.
Recommended publications
  • Market Overview a Quarterly Publication of the San Francisco Office Market by the Axiant Group 2Nd Quarter 2020
    Market Overview A quarterly publication of the San Francisco office market by The Axiant Group 2nd Quarter 2020 PG&E Moves Across The Bay Covid-19 has in essence shut down the PG&E, embroiled in bankruptcy proceedings, has just office leasing market in San Francisco. committed to moving its headquarters from San Francisco Because of shelter in place orders and a real fear of contracting to Oakland as a cost-cutting move. They have leased 600,000 the virus, building tours are non-existent. In addition, the square feet at 300 Lakeside Drive. PG&E plans to occupy the economy has been stilted due to the pandemic. Most tenants space in 2022. As want to see stabilization of the virus or a vaccine before leases expire, considering long term commitments. We are seeing increased they will fill inventory of sublease space flooding the market, particularly the rest of the from the tech industry. building and also have a right to Sublease Space Increases Dramatically purchase the Second quarter vacancy rates increased dramatically from an building. 300 adjusted 6.7% in the 1st quarter to 8.4% in the 2nd quarter. Lakeshore Drive, Gross leasing activity decreased from 1,037,496 square feet built in 1960 in the 1st quarter to 791,518 square feet in the 2nd quarter. for Kaiser as Net absorption was significantly lower again at negative 300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, OAKLAND their company absorpstion of 1,043,366 square feet, compared to 1st quarter headquarters, went through a significant renovation in 2004. with negative absorption of 297,300 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    , UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2019 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from To Commission File Number: 001-36746 PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland 32-0439307 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1633 Broadway, Suite 1801, New York, NY 10019 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 237-3100 Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock of Paramount Group, Inc., PGRE New York Stock Exchange $0.01 par value per share Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Title of each class None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Presépio Vivo No Lusitania Do Toronto
    PÂG. 5 PâG. 26 J y-HCO t.MiUiTD S/J>lTO TORONTO RCPRESENTATIVE OFFICE 860-c COLLEGE STREET WEST loào lardim gostava MAISFOBTES TORONTO, ON M6H 1A2 de 'lazer uma coisa" 804 Dupont St. at Shaw - TOROHTO Lord of the Rings TEL.416-530-1700 FAX: 416-530-0067 1-800-794-8176 E-MAIL: [email protected] . 4 <16-531-5401 Um filme a nao perder na Europa WWW.BES.PT CIIOJ CANADIAN PUBLICATION MAIL AGREEMENT #1414526 O MILENIO PORTUGUESE-CANADIAN NEWSPAPER • THURSDAY 27th December, 2001 • ANO III EDIÇÂO N° 163 • PREÇO: 50C™CL GST Presépio vivo no (D)eficientes em concorrida lusitania do Toronto testa de Natal CONTINUA NA PAGINA 13 CiRV frnm oMaENioj DESEJAM A TODOS BOAS FESTAS TV newspaper Nonas pon dia ria sua oonnpariNia 2 Quinta-feira, 27 Dezembro, 2001 COMUNIDADE O MILéNIO sem vértebras O ultimo jogo entre o BENFICA e o SPORTING, pagar. no Estadio da Luz, ficou para a historia por varias Mas, dinheiro para a compra de muitos jogadores, razôes. hâ sempre!?... Para além das peripécias do prôprio jogo, com Ainda hoje nâo compreendo como é que muitas acusaçôes a recairem sobre o arbitre da conseguiram chegar a um consenso correcte e legal partida, aquele jogo foi o de despedida dos velhos entre os CLUBES e as SAD's. rivais no estâdio, e foi o domingo que marcou o Na SAD-Benfica, hâ muito dinheiro. No S.L. e começo do fim do Estâdio dâ Luz. Benfica, nâo hâ um chavo (e isto é igual, na minha Foi também a estreia do "derby" no circuito da opiniâo, para corn os outres clubes e suas SAD's).
    [Show full text]
  • Paramount Group, Inc
    Exhibit 99.2 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 1633 Broadway 1301 Avenue of the Americas 31 West 52nd Street One Market Plaza 300 Mission Street Market Center FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This supplemental information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. You can identify these statements by our use of the words “assumes,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “guidance,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects” and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. You should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. These factors include, without limitation, the negative impact of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic on the U.S., regional and global economies and our tenants' financial condition and results of operations, the ability to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms, dependence on tenants’ financial condition, trends in the office real estate industry including telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing, the uncertainties of real estate development, acquisition and disposition activity, the ability to effectively integrate acquisitions, the costs and availability of financing, the ability of our joint venture partners to satisfy their obligations, the effects of local, national and international economic and market conditions, the effects of acquisitions, dispositions and possible impairment charges on our operating results, regulatory changes, including changes to tax laws and regulations, and other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Architectural Theory Is the First Critical History of a Ma Architectural Thought Over the Last Forty Years
    a ND M a LLGR G OOD An Introduction to Architectural Theory is the first critical history of a ma architectural thought over the last forty years. Beginning with the VE cataclysmic social and political events of 1968, the authors survey N the criticisms of high modernism and its abiding evolution, the AN INTRODUCT rise of postmodern and poststructural theory, traditionalism, New Urbanism, critical regionalism, deconstruction, parametric design, minimalism, phenomenology, sustainability, and the implications of AN INTRODUCTiON TO new technologies for design. With a sharp and lively text, Mallgrave and Goodman explore issues in depth but not to the extent that they become inaccessible to beginning students. ARCHITECTURaL THEORY i HaRRY FRaNCiS MaLLGRaVE is a professor of architecture at Illinois Institute of ON TO 1968 TO THE PRESENT Technology, and has enjoyed a distinguished career as an award-winning scholar, translator, and editor. His most recent publications include Modern Architectural HaRRY FRaNCiS MaLLGRaVE aND DaViD GOODmaN Theory: A Historical Survey, 1673–1968 (2005), the two volumes of Architectural ARCHITECTUR Theory: An Anthology from Vitruvius to 2005 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2005–8, volume 2 with co-editor Christina Contandriopoulos), and The Architect’s Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). DaViD GOODmaN is Studio Associate Professor of Architecture at Illinois Institute of Technology and is co-principal of R+D Studio. He has also taught architecture at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design and at Boston Architectural College. His work has appeared in the journal Log, in the anthology Chicago Architecture: Histories, Revisions, Alternatives, and in the Northwestern University Press publication Walter Netsch: A Critical Appreciation and Sourcebook.
    [Show full text]
  • PATH Underground Walkway
    PATH Marker Signs ranging from Index T V free-standing outdoor A I The Fairmont Royal York Hotel VIA Rail Canada H-19 pylons to door decals Adelaide Place G-12 InterContinental Toronto Centre H-18 Victory Building (80 Richmond 1 Adelaide East N-12 Hotel D-19 The Hudson’s Bay Company L-10 St. West) I-10 identify entrances 11 Adelaide West L-12 The Lanes I-11 W to the walkway. 105 Adelaide West I-13 K The Ritz-Carlton Hotel C-16 WaterPark Place J-22 130 Adelaide West H-12 1 King West M-15 Thomson Building J-10 95 Wellington West H-16 Air Canada Centre J-20 4 King West M-14 Toronto Coach Terminal J-5 100 Wellington West (Canadian In many elevators there is Allen Lambert Galleria 11 King West M-15 Toronto-Dominion Bank Pavilion Pacific Tower) H-16 a small PATH logo (Brookfield Place) L-17 130 King West H-14 J-14 200 Wellington West C-16 Atrium on Bay L-5 145 King West F-14 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower mounted beside the Aura M-2 200 King West E-14 I-16 Y button for the floor 225 King West C-14 Toronto-Dominion Centre J-15 Yonge-Dundas Square N-6 B King Subway Station N-14 TD Canada Trust Tower K-18 Yonge Richmond Centre N-10 leading to the walkway. Bank of Nova Scotia K-13 TD North Tower I-14 100 Yonge M-13 Bay Adelaide Centre K-12 L TD South Tower I-16 104 Yonge M-13 Bay East Teamway K-19 25 Lower Simcoe E-20 TD West Tower (100 Wellington 110 Yonge M-12 Next Destination 10-20 Bay J-22 West) H-16 444 Yonge M-2 PATH directional signs tell 220 Bay J-16 M 25 York H-19 390 Bay (Munich Re Centre) Maple Leaf Square H-20 U 150 York G-12 you which building you’re You are in: J-10 MetroCentre B-14 Union Station J-18 York Centre (16 York St.) G-20 in and the next building Hudson’s Bay Company 777 Bay K-1 Metro Hall B-15 Union Subway Station J-18 York East Teamway H-19 Bay Wellington Tower K-16 Metro Toronto Convention Centre you’ll be entering.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Shodalialat Jo Uoputtuojsmai
    mob, re•ANII,~J. ...he..• A1,1161111.• •••••••111.1.11 winr.d 11.1110.11, alMOINEW Irb:40141111 .11011111111. I 411•111114110 sHodalialAT jo uoputtuojsmai N 0 1 S fl 0 H IlaahTfiN '6£ al/11E110A • C861 aNsir • INhialV aDill dO NOLIVIDOSSV C—, 0E11 SALLYPORT-JUNE 1983 2 Bad Timing (anthropology); and Geoffrey 3 The Pajama Game L. Winningham '65 (photog- 7 Under Milkwood raphy); subjects to be 8 To Be Or Not To Be/ Ministry of announced. Fear 11:45 A.M. Luncheon and Annual Convo- 9 My Dinner With Andre cation, including awarding of ANNOUNCEMENT 10 Come and Get It gold medals for distinguished 14 Rashoman service. Continuing Studies 15 The Third Man / Our Man in 2:00 P.M. Rice vs. Texas A&M, Rice Transfor- The Office of Continuing Studies and Special Havana Stadium. Houston: The 16 Special Treatment (premiere) 5:00-7:00 P.M. Dance to Big Band music Metropolis, Programs offers language courses designed mation of to develop conversational skills in Spanish, 17 The Man Who Laughs courtesy of John E. Dyson the by Jeffrey Karl Ochsner French, Mandarin Chinese, Japanese, Ger- 21 Dead of Night '43 in the Grand Hall of '73. As Houston comes man, Italian, Arabic, and Russian. Daytime 22 Dr. No / Alphaville RMC. 4 College alumni invited to indi- into its own as a major American courses in intensive English as a Second Lan- 23 The Last Detail the guage (ESL)are offered at nine levels of profi- 24 Whiskey Galore vidual colleges for a cookout. city, Rice alumni are in fore- Les Mistons /Jules and Jim Evening Reunion parties, including of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Shareholder Letter
    Strong Growth, Improved Performance For 2018 as a whole, we delivered solid quarterly results and significantly improved performance. For the full year of 2018, net income was up 50 percent, earnings per share (EPS) increased $1.24 to $3.72 per share, return on assets (ROA) was up 35 bps To Our Shareholders: to 1.17 percent, loans grew $1 billion to end the year at $20 billion, commercial criticized loans declined $451 million, or 42 percent, As of May 25, 2018, we became Hancock Whitney. and we achieved our goal of reducing our energy exposure to approximately 5 percent. On an operating basis, net income was up almost $100 million, or 38 percent, operating EPS increased $1.10 to just under $4 per share, and ROA was up 29 basis points to 1.25 percent.1 The year ended with tangible common equity (TCE) back above 8 percent and improved operating leverage of $38 million. We achieved these financial accomplishments while completing two significant transactions: the divestiture of Harrison Finance in March and the acquisition of Capital One’s trust and asset PPNR(TE)(a) Celebrating Hancock Whitney. On May Total25, 2018 Loans we opened the management business in July. Our board, executive team and (in millions) Nasdaq Stock Market as Hancock Whitney(in Corporation billions) (HWC), formally I are grateful to and proud of the nearly 4,000 associates who 500 introducing the new Hancock25 Whitney name and brand to America’s worked hard every day to achieve these results. investment$434.4 community. $401.8 $20.0 400 20 $19.0 During the year, we remained prudent in how we deployed $16.8 $323.4 Our new name and new brand mark$15.7 a new chapter in our ongoing our capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Codes and Housing
    Building Codes and Housing Building Codes and Housing David Listokin Rutgers University David B. Hattis Building Technology Inc. Abstract This article examines whether and to what extent building codes affect housing costs. It first describes these technical provisions, then considers how building codes could theoretically affect housing costs, and finally analyzes empirical studies on the subject. While the latter are dated and suffer from other limitations, the more rigorous quan­ titative analyses indicate that codes increase housing costs by 5 percent or less. Further, building codes are in a state of flux and we need to examine how the current generation of regulations affects housing. Thus, building codes merit contemporary investigation; however, these regulations have much less impact on housing costs compared to other regulations such as zoning and subdivisions requirements. Introduction and Summary This article considers the regulation of housing construction (single-family and multifamily, new construction and rehabilitation of existing buildings), focusing on the building code (a broad term specifically defined in this article). It first describes the building code and then traces its history. The history of the building code is important because numerous events and disparate parties have shaped the code, which currently is in a state of evolution. The code is moving toward two national model templates that influence local building code regulations, and away from the three regional-oriented model codes that have been influencing local regulations. In theory, the building code could adversely affect housing production and could increase housing costs through both substantive (technical) and administrative impediments. Examples of the former include restrictions of cost-saving materials and technologies and barriers to mass production; the latter encompasses such barriers as administrative conflicts among different administering parties (for example, building and fire departments) and inadequately trained inspectors.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: An Overview of Structural & Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing & Diagrid Systems Authors: Kheir Al-Kodmany, Professor, Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois Mir Ali, Professor Emeritus, School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Subjects: Architectural/Design Structural Engineering Keywords: Structural Engineering Structure Publication Date: 2016 Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 5 Number 4 Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Kheir Al-Kodmany; Mir Ali International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of December 2016, Vol 5, No 4, 271-291 High-Rise Buildings http://dx.doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2016.5.4.271 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php An Overview of Structural and Aesthetic Developments in Tall Buildings Using Exterior Bracing and Diagrid Systems Kheir Al-Kodmany1,† and Mir M. Ali2 1Urban Planning and Policy Department, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607, USA 2School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA Abstract There is much architectural and engineering literature which discusses the virtues of exterior bracing and diagrid systems in regards to sustainability - two systems which generally reduce building materials, enhance structural performance, and decrease overall construction cost. By surveying past, present as well as possible future towers, this paper examines another attribute of these structural systems - the blend of structural functionality and aesthetics. Given the external nature of these structural systems, diagrids and exterior bracings can visually communicate the inherent structural logic of a building while also serving as a medium for artistic effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Year Old Air Conditioning Systems in USA (How They Are Kept Operating and Energy Efficient)
    CIBSE ASHRAE Group 15 February 2012 50 year old air conditioning systems in USA (How they are kept operating and energy efficient) David Arnold Partner, Troup Bywaters + Anders (D.Arnold@TBandA@com) Royal Academy Visiting Professor Faculty of Engineering, Science and Built Environment London South Bank University ([email protected]) Chicago Architecture and Art Showcase Chicago Architecture and Art Showcase Chicago Architecture and Art Showcase Trump International Hotel and Tower Fisher Building 50 year old air conditioning systems in USA John Hancock Richard J Daley Inland Steel Building Comparison Building Inland Steel Richard J Daley John Hancock Completed 1958 1965 1970 Floors / Height 19 / 101m (332ft) 31 / 203m (667'-5") 100 / 334m (1,127ft) Gross Floor Area 28,780m² 136,220m² 232,542m² Tinted Single/Double? Single Ground to 41 Thermal Tinted Single Full height glass Double 43 to 97 Dual Duct Perimeter Induction Perimeter Induction Air conditioning High Velocity (Changeover) (Changeover) Floor outlet CAV Reheat Interior CAV Reheat Interior Fuel Gas Heavy Oil / Gas Electric Boiler Power 10.3 MW 29MW 19.3MW Frig Power 3.3MW 29MW 24MW The Inland Steel Building - 1958 The Inland Steel Building - 1958 Interior Photo c1960 The Inland Steel Building - 1958 Steam Boiler (1957) Fans and Pneumatic Controls (1957) The Richard J Daley Center 1966 John Hancock Center 1970 Energy Saving Measures Energy Measure Inland Steel Richard J Daley John Hancock Digital Controls ✓✓✓ Inverter Drives ✓✓✓ CAV t o VAV ✓✓✓ Thermal Performance Retrofit Glazing
    [Show full text]