From Jumpers to Goalposts Playing Pitches in Bexley Overview of Audit

From Jumpers to Goalposts

Playing Pitches in Bexley

Overview of Audit and Strategy

Contents 1 Executive Summary...... 1

2 Introduction...... 3

3 Background...... 3

4 The Purpose of a Playing Pitch Strategy ...... 4 4.1 Supporting Sports Development...... 4 4.2 Providing a Strategic Framework...... 4 4.3 Supporting other Strategies...... 5 4.4 Supporting other Local Initiatives...... 5 4.5 Supporting National Initiatives ...... 5

5 Audit Methodology ...... 7 5.1 The Demand for Pitches...... 7 5.2 The Supply of Pitches...... 11

6 Sport-specific Demand and Supply...... 13 6.1 Cricket ...... 13 6.2 Football...... 15 6.3 Hockey...... 18 6.4 Rugby ...... 21

7 General Issues arising from Consultation ...... 23 7.1 Number of Pitches ...... 23 7.2 Quality of Pitches...... 23 7.3 Quality of Ancillary Facilities ...... 24

8 Aims of the Strategy ...... 25

9 The Objectives of the Strategy...... 26 9.1 Sustain and Improve Existing Provision ...... 26 9.2 Monitor usage levels to identify changes in demand ...... 28 9.3 Release underused facilities or develop new sites, as required ...... 28

10 Implementation Plan ...... 30

11 Resources...... 35 11.1 Current Resources ...... 35 11.2 Potential Resources ...... 36

1 Executive Summary

This document outlines a Playing Pitch Strategy for Bexley, providing a strategic framework for the future provision and management of playing pitches in the Borough. It will underpin the development of key outdoor sports, as well as informing an umbrella ‘Outdoor Sports Strategy’ that is under development.

The Playing Pitch Strategy has been prepared in line with a methodology published by Sport England, and is informed by a full audit that was undertaken between 2003 and March 2005 in Bexley. The audit identifies the supply of playing pitches in the borough, in public parks, schools and private clubs and the demand for these pitches from clubs and ad hoc sports users in the following sports – football, rugby, cricket and hockey and is the first stage in the development of a full outdoor sports strategy, which will include tennis, netball, outdoor bowls and water sports.

The audit provides a benchmark of current supply and demand, and also profiles demand against anticipated changes in population in the borough until 2008. It should be noted that the audit does not include projected increases in population as a result of the Thames Gateway initiatives. This is because the population data does not yet include these figures, and although it is possible to estimate total numbers of population growth, it is not yet possible to accurately break these figures down into constituent age groups and model requirements. The strategy recognises this potential shortfall on the demand-side and suggests ways of addressing this uncertain population growth.

It should also be noted that, as with any audit, it is only possible to capture and report on a certain ‘snapshot’ in time, and information contained within the audit for example in relation to team configuration will change over time.

Key findings from this audit are:

• With the exception of rugby, there are sufficient pitches to meet demand between 2005 and 2008; • The high level of demand for public pitches leads to an on-going requirement for careful planning of pitch requirements on a season-by-season basis by Council officers. Improved monitoring of usage through the sports specific forums will enable a longer term strategic approach to planning of pitch requirements; • The high level of demand for public pitches requires an on-going commitment to a robust pitch maintenance programme. To ensure that pitches can continue to be played at current -and possibly higher- levels, without having a detrimental affect on quality it is necessary to ensure that maintenance budgets are held at a sufficient level to ensure a sufficient level of quality; • The poor quality of ancillary facilities (especially ageing changing rooms) has an impact on usage and sports development opportunities.

Three key objectives and examples of issues to be considered throughout the use of the strategy are as follows:

• To sustain and improve existing playing pitch provision – through Council commitment to on-going careful management of bookings and pitch layout on a seasonal basis, as well as through a commitment to maintain satisfactory levels of grounds maintenance, to ensure that the pitches are able to sustain a high level of use.

• To monitor usage levels to enable identification of changes in demand – through Council officers and the sports forums monitoring playing trends and increasing communication and liaison between clubs, in order to prevent some clubs struggling to find players, whilst others are struggling to manage demand.

• To release underused facilities or develop new sites as required – the strategy recognises that some land in the borough is currently designated as playing field, but is no longer used as such, due to issues such as its size, poor quality or location within the borough. In such circumstances, this strategy suggests that formal realignment of this land should be considered. However, in order to ensure that an adequacy of good quality playing pitches is retained in the borough, and also to assist in providing for any additional, unidentified growth in demand in the future, the strategy also recognises the importance of seeking for new built developments to include (through Section 106 agreements or equivalent) the inclusion of new playing pitches or Multi Use Games Areas, as appropriate. Sport England has produced a document “Good Practice Guide providing for Sport & Recreation through new housing development” (2001) which provides guidance on how best to incorporate sport facilities within new development. The strategy also identifies the need for the Council to gain external funding for pitch improvements and new ancillary facilities as demand requires.

In addition to the realignment of sites that are not fit for purpose and the development of new sites through planning agreements and grant funding, the strategy also identifies a need to encourage schools and private clubs to consider hiring out their playing pitches, in order to increase supply.

The strategy concludes with a detailed implementation plan, that highlights key actions, responsible officers and estimated completion dates, as well as the potential resource implications of the actions – a subject that is given further consideration in the concluding section of the strategy.

It should be noted that the detailed audit of Bexley’s Playing Pitches, that underpins this Strategy, is available from Cultural Services Officers upon request. In addition, information about all pitches and clubs in the Borough is available at Appendix A to the rear of this document (the information is correct as of summer 2005).

For detailed information (including maps) of all the key sports facilities in Bexley, please visit www.activeplaces.com.

2 Introduction This paper outlines a proposed strategy that sets out how the Council will, in partnership with other providers and sport development forums, ensure that pitches are managed in a comprehensive manner to support the development of outdoor sports in the borough. The Strategy is underpinned by a full audit of current supply and demand for pitches in Bexley and is underpinned by an Implementation Plan, which sets out the actions required to implement the Strategy over the next 4 – 5 years.

The Strategy focuses on the major pitch sports, played in the borough: cricket, football, hockey and rugby and is the first stage in the development of a full outdoor sports strategy, which will include tennis, netball, outdoor bowls and water sports.

3 Background The Government publishes its national planning polices in a series of Planning Policy Guidance notes (PPG). One note in particular, PPG 17, issued in 2002, sets out policy guidance on Open Space and Sport and Recreation provision.

PPG 17 states that:

“To ensure effective planning for open space, sport and recreation it is essential that the needs of local communities are known. Local Authorities should undertake robust assessments of the existing and future needs of their communities for open space, sport and recreation facilities.”

Guidance on producing detailed local assessments of playing pitch requirements is set out in the report: “Towards a Level Playing Pitch – A Guide to the Production of Playing Pitch Strategies”, published in 2003 by Sport England and the Central Council of Physical Recreation. This Strategy has been developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in that report. Further information on the methodology used and the results of the findings is set out in the separate Audit Report, which can be made available on request.

The Purpose of a Playing Pitch Strategy

4.1 Supporting Sports Development The Council provides around 70 outdoor playing pitches, which tend to be used mainly by the public on a casual basis and by small and developing clubs or the junior sides of larger and more-established clubs, on a block booking basis. They therefore have an important role in supporting the development of sport, particularly at participation level, as well as assisting in increasing levels of Physical Activity in the borough.

The Council has control over pitches in its ownership and, through its letting policies can influence the use of those pitches to support the development of outdoor sports and other health and social initiatives.

With such an important resource, it is important for the Council to manage its pitches in a comprehensive and coherent manner to ensure that the pitches are used effectively and to make plans to facilitate the availability of pitches to support any future increase in demand arising from sport development interventions either by the Council or the Governing Bodies of pitch-based sports.

In addition to the council-owned pitches, there are around 50 pitches in private clubs and 40 pitches in schools, which also have a significant role in sports development. Through its programme of Focus Sports, the creation of sport development forums and through new school links created by the School Sports Co-ordinator programmes (SSCO), the Council can work more effectively with clubs and schools to ensure that wherever possible sufficient pitches are available to meet demand.

4.2 Providing a Strategic Framework The Strategy focuses on the major pitch sports, played in the borough: cricket, football, hockey and rugby and provides a strategic framework that:

Ensures a strategic approach to playing pitch provision by: • identifying current provision • setting priorities • providing a framework for development • informing and guiding funding decisions by providing robust evidence

Informs the planning process by: • identifying the need for pitches • meeting the requirements of PPG 17 • helping to protect ‘fit for purpose’ pitches from development, as appropriate • linking with other work on open spaces to provide a comprehensive approach

Assists asset management by: • leading to a more efficient use of resources • highlighting areas where quality of provision can be improved

• identifying barriers to participation Assists in sports development by: • helping to identify areas where insufficient resources may be restricting formation of teams and participation in pitch sports • providing better information on available resources

4.3 Supporting other Strategies The Playing Pitch Strategy links into and supports other Council Strategies by: • underpinning the Council’s Sports Strategy; • linking with the Parks and Open Spaces Strategy, within the framework of the wider Cultural Strategy; and • providing half of a larger Outdoor Facilities Strategy, for the borough, a requirement that was identified in the Best Value Review of Outdoor Leisure Services (May 2003). The other outdoor sports (tennis, bowls, netball and watersports) are being assessed separately and the outcome of that assessment, together with this Playing Pitch Strategy, will form the Outdoor Sports Strategy for the borough; • Provides a baseline to assess potential future demand in relation to increases in population and increased housing

4.4 Supporting other Local Initiatives The Playing Pitch Strategy relates to a number of other Council initiatives in the Health and Social Policy areas, including:

Social inclusion: helping individuals to develop their potential and self- confidence and providing a facility for the community that can be used by groups who would not always participate in sports; Community Involvement: the formation and development of local teams can help to generate a community identity; Community Safety: sport can provide a challenge and a sense of purpose for individuals; Lifelong Learning: sport can improve social skills, sports-specific skills, co- ordination and physical development as well as specific coaching skills, first aid and leadership; Healthy living: the health benefits of participation in sport are well documented. Benefits to children and young people include improved co- ordination, balance and motor skills. Active lifestyles tend to stay with a person through life providing benefits, especially against cardiac and circulatory problems. Sport and exercise can also improve balance which can be beneficial in preventing falls amongst older people.

4.5 Supporting National Initiatives

4.5.1 Supporting the National Sporting Agenda Sport England is creating a national database of sports facilities, called “Active Places”, which is aimed at increasing participation in sports, at a national level, by identifying local facilities.

The database shows the location of sports pitches in a given area together with the facilities available at that site. It is hoped that this information will improve accessibility and encourage more people to take part in sports.

The information gathered as a result of Bexley’s audit of playing pitches that has informed this strategy, has been passed to Sport England to be included in the database and all local pitches considered within this document will be mapped on the Sport England website. The website will be updated regularly, giving Bexley residents access to the latest information on facilities in the borough and surrounding areas.

The Active Places database supersedes a similar scheme being developed by the Council and can be accessed through the website (www.activeplaces.com) or Sports England’s website (www.sportengland.org.uk).

4.5.2 Supporting the Health Agenda The provision and upkeep of playing pitches plays an essential part in the national drive to increase physical activity in order to reduce obesity and improve the national health.

4.5.3 Sustainable Communities The identification of playing pitches and other outdoor surfaces, such as Multi-use Games Areas and Artificial Turf Pitches, form an important part in the creation of sustainable communities in areas of regeneration.

5 Audit Methodology

5.1 The Demand for Pitches Demand for pitches is determined by the number of teams and takes into account patterns of play. The Sport England model requires that teams based in the borough should be included in the demand, even if they play on pitches outside the borough.

It is assumed that most teams will alternate between Home and Away games each week. One pitch can therefore support two teams, with one team playing at home and the other team playing away. It also assumes that demand occurs at peak times each week, typically Saturday afternoon. The supply of pitches has to be able to meet peak demand.

Every effort has been made to identify all local teams to ensure that the audit has been as robust as possible. In the case of sports with a sports development forum the exact number of teams is known and the audit will be accurate. However, in the case of football, where there is no development forum and there are a large number of clubs, estimating the exact number of teams is more difficult. This is further complicated by difficulties in determining whether a club is based in the Borough. In view of the uncertainty for football, an allowance of 10% has been added to the number of teams identified, to allow for any underestimation and increase confidence in the result of the audit.

5.1.1 Current Demand Current demand was determined by an audit of clubs, based on Council records, local knowledge, consultation with local clubs, leagues, sports development forums and reference to other databases and websites.

In view of the large number of teams that play in the borough, particularly at football, together with the casual nature of some of the teams and problems determining whether a team is based in the borough, it is difficult to ensure that the audit included every local club and team. However, every effort has been made to identify all the clubs and teams based in the borough. In the case of pitch-based sports with a Sports Development Forum (Cricket, Hockey and Rugby), the Council has robust information on levels of participation. However, in the case of football, which does not yet have a development forum, local teams have been identified through consultation, local knowledge and information provided by leagues, over a number of months.

Despite every effort being made to identify every football team, the information relating to football is not considered to be as robust as in other sports. In view of this, and in order to ensure a robust approach to the audit, an allowance of 10% has therefore been added to the number of teams identified to compensate for any inaccuracies.

The current position for each sport is summarised in the tables set out in Section 6, below.

5.1.2 Future Demand The Sport England methodology for predicting future demand is based on population forecasts and sport development targets. It assumes that if there is an increase in the population or in the rate of participation there would be a corresponding increase in the demand for pitches.

One of the key factors, influencing future demand that can not be identified at this stage, is the Government’s proposal for a substantial housing development in the Thames Gateway area. This increase in the population of Bexley is estimated to be in the region of an additional 150,000 people and has not been reflected in the official population forecasts. This is likely to create an additional demand for pitches. At this stage, however, the overall estimated growth arising from this proposal can not be identified accurately and, in particular, an analysis of the age groups involved, required to identify the numbers likely to participate in pitch sports, is not available.

In addition, some sport development initiatives do not have numerical targets for growth at this stage and the effect of these initiatives can not be quantified. However, consideration must be given to the likely effect of these initiatives and to the growing popularity of some sports, particularly at the junior level, to ensure that they can be supported by the supply of pitches.

In view of the uncertainty, the Strategy proposes safeguarding existing provision and identifies measures to monitor levels of participation and, subject to resources, to improve the supply of pitches, as required as far as is possible with limited resources.

Two factors have been taken into account when estimating future growth in demand: • changes in the population projected over the next five years (2004 – 2009); and • increases in participation due to sports development interventions.

5.1.3 Projected changes in Bexley’s Population Official population forecasts show that overall the population of Bexley is expected to increase by 1.6% between 2004 and 2009. Within this general increase, however, different age groups are expected to change at different rates. The age groups of particular interest for the development of this strategy are those most likely to engage in pitch sports and these can vary between sports. For example the age range for senior football is 18 – 45, whereas for cricket it is 18 – 55.

Population projections are broken down into 5-year age ranges (for example 10 – 14 years). However, the age ranges for participation in sports do not always coincide with the ranges used in the official statistics. Where it has not been possible to match the specific requirements of a sport to the official figures, an approximation has been made. It is unlikely that such approximations will lead to any significant under- or over- estimation.

The official population estimates include predicted falls in the 5 – 9 and 10 – 14 age groups and rises in the 20 – 44 and 45 – 54 age groups. This would imply a reducing demand for junior pitches and increasing demand for senior pitches over the next five years.

The projected rates of change across age groups, used in this determination are set out in the following table:

Mid year Bexley Age Groups estimates Total 5 – 9 10 – 14 15 – 19 20 – 44 45 – 54 2004 220,209 13,437 14,847 14,582 78,447 27,680 2009 223,789 12,575 13,190 14,700 81,809 30,145 Change % + 1.6 - 6.4 - 11.2 + 0.8 + 4.3 + 8.9

The method used to forecast future demand is to take the current number of teams playing in the borough and assume that this number will change as the population changes, i.e. a 10% increase in population can be expected to result in a 10% increase in the number of teams.

This change in demand is based solely on published national population forecasts, which do not take into account increases in population that may arise from government proposals to increase housing provision in the region, or other initiatives. Any further increases will obviously have implications for demand, although this can not be quantified, at this stage (due to the limited information available regarding the age groups of the population growth).

5.1.4 Sport Development Interventions Predictable Growth In predicting future demand, regard was also given to any changes in the proportion of the population participating in sport, arising from sport development interventions at a local, regional and national level. Of these interventions, only regional initiatives set out in the London Plan had numerical targets for growth, thus, although it is likely that local and national trends and initiatives will affect future demand they could not be quantified and have not been included in the analysis.

At a regional level, the London Plan for Sport envisages a 1% year on year increase in sports participation from 2004 – 2008, which is roughly the same as the study period used for population changes, outlined above. It has therefore been assumed that there will be an indicative increase of 5% in participation over the study period, as a result of across-London interventions.

In summary, the method used to forecast the number of teams in 2009 was based on the official population estimate for that year together, which was increased by 5% to allow for the increase in participation envisaged in the London Plan.

Identifying other Growth Other sports development interventions and trends at a local and national level may increase participation, although these are harder to predict.

At the local level, the Council has developed its Sports Strategy which includes the following Vision for the provision of sport in the borough:

“Bexley Council will seek to maximise the range and quality of sports activities available to provide safe, enjoyable and accessible sporting opportunities for all residents and visitors to Bexley. The Council aims to develop, in partnership with other sports providers, a sustainable and cost effective range of activities and events that combine to provide for the need of the local community”.

The Council is providing an integrated and co-ordinated approach to the development of sport in the Borough, through the establishment of ‘focus’ Sports Development Forums and focus clubs, involved in sports development. The forums will develop their own initiatives and provide a structured framework to ensure that developments are planned to meet local need.

At the national level, the National Governing Bodies of Sport (NGBs) will be working with Sport England to identify their plans for growth (Whole Sport Plans) and investment in the sporting infrastructure. Sport England has identified NGBs that will become `Priority Sports’ and those that will become `Development Sports’ in the longer term.

The following table sets out the outdoor focus sports adopted by Bexley and the sports selected at national level to receive support in planning and improving their infrastructure from Sport England.

Bexley Focus Sports Sport England Sport England 2003 - 2008 Priority Sports Development Sports Athletics Athletics Basketball Basketball Cricket Bowls Cricket Football Lacrosse Girls Football Golf Outdoor Pursuits Hockey Hockey Rounders\Softball Netball Netball Rugby (League and Rugby Union Tennis Tennis Sports affected by this Playing Pitch Strategy have been highlighted.

It is anticipated that the initiatives outlined above will increase participation in these sports, although at this stage any outcomes are difficult to predict and have not been included in the estimation of future demand, although the local impact may be captured by the 1% year on year increase that has already been factored into the audit, in response to the Sport England growth requirements.

5.1.5 Monitoring Changes in Participation Sports development forums are in a strong position to monitor the effects of local changes on their own sports. It is therefore proposed that they are encouraged to develop an active role in identifying annual changes in participation in their particular sports. This information will then be used to refine the predicted levels of demand set out in this strategy and the Council, in consultation with the forums, will be able to determine whether the level of provision can meet those changes or whether further action is required through the management and letting of its pitches

or by identifying additional provision. This approach should help the Council to adopt a more strategic approach to managing its pitches to meet changing demand.

Where a sport does not have a development forum, particularly football, it is proposed that the Council will take responsibility for monitoring usage and trends in participation, in consultation with local leagues.

5.2 The Supply of Pitches An audit of pitches and facilities was carried out in line with national guidelines set down by Sport England, to determine current levels of supply. The audit provides a detailed analysis of the supply of pitches and demand from teams, thereby providing a robust baseline of provision. This section together with Section 8 summarise the detailed findings of the audit, which are set out in a separate report “Playing Pitch Strategy – Audit of Facilities”. The Audit Report also includes a detailed description of the methodology used.

As described above, the information collected has been fed into the Active Places national database.

5.2.1 The Current Supply of Pitches The Sport England model requires that an audit should be carried out to identify pitches in the borough that are available for use by the community.

The supply of pitches was identified from Council records, local knowledge, consultation with local sports development forums and reference to other databases, such as the Register of English Football Facilities (REFF).

The following table summaries the number of pitches currently available for use by the public or members of clubs. It does not include pitches in schools or elsewhere that are not available for hire.

Sport Public (1) Private (2) Schools (3) Total Cricket 9 7 3 19 Football Senior 33 10 10 53 Junior 14 9 18 41 Mini 10 4 5 19 Hockey 1427 Rugby Senior 35 8 Junior 14 14 Total 70 53 38 161

Notes 1. Pitches, managed by the Council that are available for hire, usually by block bookings or on a pay and play basis 2. Pitches, owned by private clubs that are usually only available for club use – although some may be available for hire 3. Pitches in schools that are available for hire by clubs

5.2.2 Future Supply of Pitches At present, pitches at Marlborough Park and at two private football clubs, Crayford Arrows and Footscray Lions are not in use and have not been included in current supply. They are however expected to come back into use (Crayford Arrows in 2005/06 and Footscray Lions in 2007/08) and have been included in the figures for future supply.

New synthetic turf pitches are planned at a number of school sites as part of the Big Lottery Fund “PE and Sport in Schools” programme. The construction of the new pitches is currently underway, and the new facilities will be available by Autumn 2005. In particular a full sized sand based hockey pitch will be provided at Hurstmere School, which will help to alleviate the problems currently experienced by hockey teams. At Trinity school a ¾ size pitch will be provided which will be suitable for training.

5.2.3 Qualitative Issues In addition to the quantitative analysis summarised above, consultation with user groups has identified a number of qualitative issues that may affect the availability of pitches. In particular the poor quality of some pitches may be limiting usage and the condition of some ancillary facilities, such as changing rooms, do not meet current expectations and may act as a deterrent or a barrier to participation in sports. This may affect some of the target groups identified for sports development interventions including girls, women and people with disabilities. The poor quality of changing facilities may also affect the take up of some sport-based community development, inclusion and healthy living initiatives.

This strategy outlines a number of measures aimed at improving the quality of pitches and facilities, subject to available resources. This approach should not only improve the quality of the playing experience but should also increase the supply of pitches.

6 Sport-specific Supply and Demand This section identifies specific demand for pitches for each of the sports covered by the Strategy together with sport-specific issues raised during consultation.

6.1 Cricket

6.1.1 Matching Supply and Demand for Pitches

Sport 2004 2009 Junior Supply of Pitches (1) 7 7 Peak demand for Pitches 7 7 Surplus/Deficit 0 0 Senior Supply of Pitches 19 19 Peak demand for Pitches 11 13 Surplus/Deficit +8 +6

Note 1 Junior games are played on senior pitches at private clubs

The figures show that there is a surplus of senior pitches and an adequacy of junior pitches. However it is possible that growth in cricket may exceed predictions due to the growing popularity of Twenty20 cricket, the popularity of junior cricket and the recent success of the National team. An aspiration to establish a women’s team in the region (although not necessarily in Bexley) was also expressed.

Consultation has revealed that cricket clubs are not able to play on many of the public squares, due to a lack of facilities, required by the English Cricket Board leagues. In view of this and the inevitably lower standards of quality that can be achieved on an open, public cricket square, it is unlikely that public pitches can meet the quality standards required. Any future increase in demand may therefore have to be accommodated by encouraging schools to allow the use of their pitches.

6.1.2 Issues arising from Consultation Number of Pitches League requirements for the number of games to be played on Saturdays were so high that Sunday games were generally in decline and were mainly Cup games and friendlies. Although some leagues held their games on Sundays (such as the Dukes Development League) there was increasing pressure amongst senior clubs for Saturday games and this could affect peak demand.

Quality of Pitches There is a serious issue for senior league clubs regarding the quality of the pitch and supporting facilities, such as score boards, sight screens, etc, which are required to meet league requirements. As a result, senior clubs are unlikely to use public pitches, which tend to be used by smaller clubs or for casual matches.

The quality of public pitches and lack of supporting facilities may be an issue for smaller clubs that are seeking promotion to senior leagues. However, it is unlikely

that pitches with public access could be maintained at the high level required, throughout the season and clubs entering senior leagues face other issues such as the need for a clubhouse, practice areas, sightscreens, covers and score box. It is therefore unlikely that the quality of public pitches will act as a barrier to promotion for smaller clubs. This situation is accepted as a reality by clubs.

The quality of schools pitches was generally perceived to be dependent upon whether the school had its own groundskeeper or used contractors.

Quality of Ancillary Facilities There is an issue over the lack of facilities provided at public pitches, such as screens, scoreboards and for providing teas, which prevented their use by senior clubs.

6.1.3 Conclusions for Cricket

• The Audit has shown that there is a surplus of senior pitches and an adequacy of junior pitches between 2004 – 2009 • Public pitch quality is unlikely to be able to meet senior league requirements, however this is accepted as a reality by clubs and is not unique to Bexley • Any future unmet demand (not identified a this point in time) will need to be met through school pitch provision

6.2 Football

6.2.1 Matching Supply and Demand for Pitches 2004 2009 Mini Supply of Pitches 57 61 Peak demand for Pitches 49 49 Surplus/Deficit +8 +12 Junior Supply of Pitches 77 80 Peak demand for Pitches 81 76 Surplus/Deficit -4 +4 Senior Supply of Pitches 53 54 Peak demand for Pitches 37 40 Surplus/Deficit +16 +14

The calculations show that currently there is a shortage of junior pitches and a surplus of mini pitches and senior pitches. Any shortage can be accommodated within existing provision, especially as the estimated number of teams has been increased by 10% (to allow for any clubs that may not have shown up in the audit).

Junior Football Bexley Junior Football League is one of the biggest junior leagues in the country and demand for pitches is very high. Overall the League has sufficient pitches available to complete its weekly fixtures but the continuing growth in demand places pressure on existing pitches.

The league is based in Bexley but includes many clubs from neighbouring Greenwich, Bromley and Dartford. Games are played at schools, clubs and parks throughout the area covered by the league. In particular, many games are played at the Marathon Ground, Shooters Hill Rd just outside the borough. This playing field serves as a centre for junior football in the area.

The Council works closely with the league to accommodate demand and has made more junior pitches available for the 2004/05 season. Penhill Park is used exclusively for junior games and has provision for eight pitches but problems with parking and disturbance to residents prevent this site from reaching its full potential.

The growth in popularity of some sports, particularly junior football has led to an uneven growth amongst clubs, with some clubs having to turn potential players away, whilst other clubs advertise for players. Further work is required to determine the general levels of growth in participation and to co-ordinate player supply and demand issues amongst clubs.

It may be possible to help meet the high levels of demand by encouraging more schools to allow the use of their pitches. Some schools have indicated a willingness to encourage community use of their pitches but others are not so keen because of the increased wear and tear on their pitches. This option may therefore have only a limited benefit to the league.

Senior Football There will always be a strong demand for football pitches, due to the popularity of what is the national sport, however, figures show that the supply of pitches is sufficient to meet current levels of demand.

Future initiatives by the Football Association to promote the game to 17 year olds and over and the increased popularity of women’s football will increase demand and may create additional demand in the future.

It should also be noted that for both the junior and senior game, an additional 10% demand has been assumed in order to compensate for any uncertainties (as stated above), thus it is very likely that the situation is better than the table indicates, in terms of capacity.

6.2.2 Issues arising from Consultation Number of Pitches Generally it was agreed that, due to the popularity of the national game, it is unlikely that there could ever be enough pitches, a perception that is likely to be shared across the UK. At present, however it was agreed that there were no perceived shortages in the borough and that clubs that played outside the borough did so by choice.

Public pitches were considered to be very important at supporting football at the participation level and had a significant role in supporting initiatives by both the Football Association and the Leagues to develop the senior game.

Quality of Pitches Generally it was accepted that there was a trade-off between price and quality with clubs paying higher fees for better quality, private pitches. Charges for public pitches also reflected the condition of the pitch, facilities available and location.

It was felt that some of the problems with wear around goal mouths resulted from overplaying, especially from informal use during the week. It was suggested that moveable goal posts or goal walls for casual users could alleviate some of the problem.

The pattern of use in junior or mini games resulted in several games being played in one day on the same pitch, which could have also have implications for wear and tear.

It is perhaps also worth noting that an independent user survey undertaken in January 2005 indicated that 60% of football users felt the astroturf pitches ‘reasonable’ and only 20% considered them ‘expensive’, whilst 20% thought the pitches ‘excellent’ and 60% ‘good’.

Quality of Ancillary Facilities In addition to the points outlined above, the lack of suitable changing rooms was considered to be undermining the development of the game and, in particular recent steps by the Football Association to encourage young people (17/18 year olds) into the senior game.

Other Issues The consultation meeting identified a need for a “Local Stadium” – a good quality pitch for league cup finals etc or other “showcase” games. Erith Stadium would be an ideal venue but was considered to be too expensive with poor availability. There was a good potential demand for a showcase stadium with 6 leagues and 4 divisions, all with cup finals. The Council seek to identify a suitable venue and promote its use as a local stadium.

6.2.3 Conclusions for Football

• The Audit has shown that there is, with the exception of a current deficiency of junior pitches in 2004, an overall surplus of football pitches between 2004 – 2009 • In view of the 10% tolerance added to the demand side of the audit (to allow for clubs that may not have been identified) the lack of 4 pitches for junior football is not considered an issue, particularly as the deficit becomes a surplus by 2009 • The general consultation revealed: o despite the apparent match in supply/demand, there will always be demand for more pitches o there is concern about over-playing pitches, especially at goal mouths o the quality of ancillary facilities (particularly public park facilities) is a barrier to participation – especially the quality of some changing rooms o there is a demand for a reasonably priced stadium that can be hired by clubs to enable them to showcase skills

6.3 Hockey

6.3.1 Matching Supply and Demand for Pitches The position with hockey is different to the other sports because of the use of Artificial Turf Pitches (ATP) which allow for several games to be played during one day. There are three ATPs used for hockey, in the borough: one at Mayplace Recreation Ground and two at Erith School. The use of these pitches is managed by the hockey development forum to ensure that all league fixtures are met.

In addition to the ATPs there are four grass pitches, three at Bexley Cricket Club and one at Bexleyheath Sports Club. Grass pitches are used mainly by juniors, veterans and lower teams in clubs.

It is also difficult to determine weekly peak demand for junior pitches as games tend to be irregular, at this level.

The following table sets out the demand for pitches but, as ATPs are capable of withstanding a greater number of games than natural turf pitches, the standard method for calculating demand does not apply and any surplus/deficit can not therefore be identified.

Sport 2004 2009 Mini Supply of Pitches (1) 4 4 Peak demand for Pitches (2) - - Surplus/Deficit (see above) (see above) Junior Supply of Pitches (1) 4 4 Peak demand for Pitches (3) - - Surplus/Deficit (see above) (see above) Senior Supply of Pitches 3 ATP 4 ATP 4 grass 4 grass Peak demand for Pitches (4) 15 16 Surplus/Deficit (see above) (see above)

Notes 1. 4 grass pitches, clubs also use the Astroturf pitches at Erith School and Mayplace 2. Very few games are played at this level – pitches mainly used for training 3. More games are played at this level but still irregular– pitches mainly used for training 4. Assumes majority of games are played on Saturdays

Generally the hockey forum manages the available time slots to ensure that all games are played. There are however, programming difficulties arising from a league requirement that teams playing ‘Away’ games should not have to leave their clubhouse before 9:30 am to reach the venue in time for the start of the game. This can have implications for programming games against teams from East Kent, which have a long travel time to reach Bexley.

Consultation with the Hockey Development Forum has identified that, overall, the demand for pitches is currently being managed to meet demand. However, the use of pitches, especially the ATPs is at the maximum possible and problems are often

experienced, when matches overrun due to late starts or stoppages due to injuries. In particular, there is often insufficient time between fixtures to allow for a proper warm up before a game and this has serious implications for potential injuries to players.

An additional pitch would help to overcome these difficulties and will be required to meet expected growth. A new full size pitch is currently being built at Hurstmere School, as one of the Big lottery Fund ‘PE and Sports in Schools’ projects and this will alleviate these problems.

As the majority of hockey training also takes place on either Artificial Turf Pitches or sand based Multi Use Games Areas, rather than grass pitches, the provision of additional facilities is very capital intensive and can also be challenging in planning terms due to the need for floodlighting, often close to residential areas. However, the new full size pitch at Hurstmere School, alongside the other new all weather training pitches, will help to ensure that demand is met.

6.3.2 Issues arising from Consultation Number of Pitches Most games were played on artificial turf pitches (ATPs) at Mayplace and Erith School. Although ATPs are capable of withstanding continuous levels of games, there are timing issues arising from the number of games that had to be played. Generally, this reduced the turnaround times between games and that prevented players from warming up properly, which could increase the risk of injuries.

Planned new pitches, together with proposed lighting at Erith School to assist training demand should alleviate this problem.

Quality of Ancillary Facilities Particular mention was made of the lack of any clubhouse at hockey sites and the shortage of floodlights. Hockey players also felt that the cost of pitch hire was very expensive, as their games had to be played on artificial pitches, which tended to be more expensive. However, there appears to be some conflicting views on value and quality issues, because a separate, independent user survey undertaken by the Outdoor Recreation Manager in January 2005 indicated that 75% of users found the cost of pitches ‘reasonable’, and only 25% found them expensive, with 50% stating that the pitches were in ‘good’ condition and 50% finding them ‘fair’.

The playing pitch strategy consultation also indicated that Mayplace sports field is considered by some to be in poor condition, with problems with litter and overcrowding by other players overspilling onto the hockey pitches. However, again this is contrary to other findings. In view of the seemingly conflicting views, in relation to hockey users satisfaction, this situation will be carefully monitored, and actions taken as and when there is a clear steer over the real issues.

6.3.3 Conclusions for Hockey • It is difficult to identify the exact demand for mini and junior pitches, as demand tends to be irregular, thus the audit focuses more on the senior hockey requirements • Currently, demand for senior matches is just being met, through careful planning – but the shortage of ATPs results in insufficient warm-up time and has programming implications for league matches • The new ATP currently being constructed at Hurstmere School will alleviate most demand problems • There is a lack of ancillary facilities – particularly a clubhouse and also a shortage of floodlighting

6.4 Rugby

6.4.1 Matching Supply and Demand for Pitches

Sport 2004 2009 Mini Supply of Pitches 14 14 Peak demand for Pitches 12 12 Surplus/Deficit +2 +2 Junior Supply of Pitches 8 8 Peak demand for Pitches 9 10 Surplus/Deficit -1 -2 Senior Supply of Pitches 8 8 Peak demand for Pitches (1) 10 11 Surplus/Deficit -2 -3

The calculations show that there is a surplus of mini pitches and a shortage of junior pitches however it is likely that the junior shortage could be accommodated within existing provision through careful programming of games.

The calculation also identifies a shortage of two senior pitches in the borough. This demand is from Bexley RFC, a local club that plays outside the borough. Although the club has sufficient pitches for its use in its current location, they can not be included in the audit of supply, as they are located outside the borough. As a result the audit is skewed and highlights a shortage of pitches.

It is recognised that Bexley RFC plays an active role in developing rugby in the borough, and has a long term ambition to return to a local ground. In view of this, the Strategy identifies the need for additional rugby pitches but it should be noted that, if the club is to relocate to the borough, it will require additional facilities, such as a clubhouse, with changing accommodation, floodlighting and training areas. Thus, although it may be possible to meet the demand, in the short term, by marking out additional rugby pitches within existing parks or open spaces, this would not meet the broader needs of the club. It is not, therefore, simply a matter of not having enough playing pitches, but a matter of the need to create the infrastructure of ancillary facilities for a club, which are currently available to the club outside the borough. In view of this, although the Council supports the club in its long term aspiration to return to the borough, it should be noted that this issue is less about a need to find more playing pitches, and more about a need to find substantial funding to replicate the club’s current out of borough club house and ancillary facilities within the borough of Bexley.

Junior rugby is becoming increasingly popular, following the success of the national team in the World Cup in 2003, and may increase demand for junior pitches above the levels anticipated. The rugby development forum will monitor demand and identify the implications of additional demand to determine the appropriate level of provision. If this level of interest in junior rugby is sustained it may have implications for the demand for senior pitches in the future.

6.4.2 Issues arising from Consultation Number of Pitches The increased popularity of the junior game was creating pressure for the number of pitches and timetabling games and training during the 2004/05 season.

Quality of Ancillary Facilities There is a shortage of changing rooms, especially at the Old Dartfordians and Northumberland Heath (Erith RFC) grounds and the existing changing rooms at Northumberland Heath are in poor condition.

There is displaced demand for rugby pitches in the borough, following the relocation of Bexley RFC to a pitch at Bexley Park Sports & Social Club, Calvert Drive (the former Bexley Hospital site), which is just outside the borough. The club considers itself to be a Bexley club and has an aspiration to return to the borough, if a suitable site, which must include suitable facilities, such as a clubhouse, training area and floodlighting, can be found.

6.4.3 Conclusions for Rugby

• The Audit has shown that there is a surplus of mini pitches and a deficit of junior pitches – this issue could be resolved by re- programming games • The Audit shows a deficit of two senior pitches. This is because Bexley RFC wish to return to the borough (and thus show up on the demand side of the audit) even though supply is provided, albeit in another borough. This issue is less about the lack of two pitches and more about the lack of ancillary facilities (including clubhouse and floodlighting) which would be required in order for the club to relocate to Bexley • The quality of the changing facilities is generally poor

7 General Issues arising from Consultation During the consultation with user groups a number of general issues were identified which have not been covered in the sport-specific sections above. The strategy will aim to address these issues and this will help to improve the current provision of playing pitches in the borough.

7.1 Number of Pitches Although the audit revealed that, overall, supply can (and will continue to) meet demand, consultation with each of the sports forums raised the following concerns/perceptions.

It was recognised that there has been a decline in the number of pitches over the years, particularly due to the selling of private grounds, for example sports grounds belonging to private companies, and the loss of some public pitches. It was also noted that increasing numbers of people, especially children and young people were taking part in sports and that this, together with the growing pressure for new housing developments, will increase demand in the near future. The demand for junior football is now very strong, resulting in no spare pitches being available on Sundays and the demand in junior football and rugby could be affected by a lack of suitable pitches.

It was also agreed that a lack of suitable pitches could affect the development of some sports, on a geographical basis. In particular, if growth in junior cricket exceeds predicted levels, it may affect development of the game in the north of the borough, due to the smaller number of cricket pitches there.

However, it was agreed that by working with the sport development forums these local shortfalls can be identified and measures adopted to meet any shortfalls, through a better matching of supply and demand.

7.2 Quality of Pitches Consultation showed that private pitches were generally considered to be in a better condition than public pitches and this was reflected in higher charges.

Public pitches were considered to be generally satisfactory and this reflects the level of maintenance work and improvements carried out by the Council. Specific mention was made of: • dog fouling of pitches in public parks was a serious nuisance; • public pitches were unlikely to meet cricket league requirements and most senior clubs played on private pitches; • wear and tear around football goal mouths was a problem and was believed to be exacerbated by informal play; and • grounds maintenance regimes in public parks and some schools seemed to focus on grass cutting, with less attention paid to harrowing or other renovation works and this was perceived to be affecting quality.

7.3 Quality of Ancillary Facilities The consultation identified widespread concern, across all sports, over the quality and availability of changing rooms. Generally, conditions were considered unacceptable in this day and age and, in many cases were perceived as barriers to the participation in sport by many groups including women, people with disabilities, children and young people.

In particular, it was felt that: • conditions do not meet current standards or expectations; • facilities did not meet the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (although, since then, a programme is being rolled out to undertake works to address DDA-compliance issues); • facilities do not support the growth in women’s and girl’s football; • facilities do not encourage participation by young people; • there are child protection issues around the lack of privacy for children changing in the open; • there are insufficient facilities for officials; and • there are insufficient facilities for first aid.

7.3.1 Conclusions from Consultation

• Private pitches have been sold off in recent years, resulting in rising demand for the remaining pitches • A diminished supply may inhibit sports development in the future; this will be monitored by the individual forums and the Council • Public pitches sometimes suffer from dog fouling, goal mouth wear and tear and “generalised” grounds maintenance regimes in relation to private pitches, although this is reflected in the charging policy • The poor quality of changing rooms is a widespread concern

8 Aims and Objectives of the Strategy As outlined above, it is estimated that the current supply of pitches in the borough is sufficient to meet current and expected demand. The Strategy recognises the importance of ensuring that existing levels of provision are maintained to meet current and expected levels of demand and that cost-effective ways of developing additional appropriate pitches and ancillary facilities are identified to support additional demand, especially at the junior level. There are, however, a number of factors, which could result in future demand outgrowing the supply. It is therefore proposed that procedures for monitoring usage of pitches, through the sports development forums, are established to identify growing levels of demand.

If additional pitches are required, there are a number of suitable sites that could be developed. During the audit of pitches, sites have been identified that were not in use, because of contamination or other land issues, but which could be developed as pitches with ancillary facilities, such as changing rooms. There would however be a resource issue and Section 13 of this report suggests ways that such developments might be funded.

Given the current sufficiency of pitches, some sites in the borough, which are not suitable for development as playing pitches, because of layout, size, slope or access could be disposed of. However, if these sites are developed as housing, leading to an increase in population and therefore an additional demand for pitches, provision should be made for some of the proceeds from the realignment of the unsuitable land to be used to improve supply at more suitable sites (through, for example, Section 106 agreements).

The quality of some pitches and facilities does not meet current requirements or expectations and this may be affecting the potential supply of pitches in the borough. In particular the lack of suitable changing accommodation, or the poor condition of existing accommodation, may act as a barrier for some people, particularly people with disabilities, women and girls. The overall aims or objectives of the strategy are, therefore, to: • sustain and improve existing provision (particularly in relation to meeting DDA requirements); • monitor usage levels to identify changes in demand; and • release underused facilities or develop new sites, as required.

The Key aims and Objectives of this strategy are set out in Section 9 of this report and the Implementation Plan, which sets out the actions required to implement the strategy to April 2008 is set out in Section 10. It is envisaged that this strategy will be reviewed in 2008, as part of the review of the Council’s overall Sports Strategy (which runs from 2003-2008).

9 The Aims and Objectives of the Strategy A number of key objectives have been identified aimed at helping to achieve the aims of the strategy and address the issues outlined in previous sections. The objectives are set out below. An Implementation Plan aimed at securing these objectives is set out in Section 10.

9.1 Sustain and Improve Existing Provision

9.1.1 Quantity of Pitches The strategy recognises the importance of protecting the existing supply of pitches and identifying underused pitches, including those in schools, which could be bought into use if demand increases above that predicted. It also proposes that sport development forums should be encouraged to review levels of participation to identify trends and potential shortages in the supply of pitches.

Although the audit has established that there are sufficient pitches to meet current and expected demands, there are concerns over the robustness of the predictions for future demand as a result of likely increases in population and participation, which cannot be quantified at this stage. There is also a long term desire to relocate Bexley RFC within the borough.

Although the Council is meeting current demand, there are difficulties meeting fluctuations in demand that can occur from season to season, which leads to short- term reactive measures. It is anticipated that the involvement of forums in planning to meet future growth will lead to the longer-term management of pitches.

9.1.2 Quality of Pitches The strategy will promote the improvement in quality of public pitches, within available resources and existing contractual arrangements.

The problem of informal play and overuse of pitches will be investigated to resolve the issue, including considering possible solutions such as providing: • additional training areas, particularly the NOF pitches planned at several school sites; • kickabout areas and ball courts; • additional goal sockets to reduce wear and tear in goal mouths

Some of these proposals may result in increased initial costs but these may be result in long term savings in maintenance costs. Also general improvement in quality will lead to the ability to charge higher fees.

Further consideration will be given to the most effective way of informing dog walkers about the health risks associated with dog fouling and to discuss with the Dog Warden Service how the Bye-laws could be enforced.

A similar “Inform and Enforce” approach could also be adopted to reduce informal play where it is leading to unacceptable levels of wear and tear.

The perceptions of the development forums and other focus groups of the standards of grounds maintenance will be addressed. Discussions will be held with the groups to determine the extent and nature of the problem. In some cases this may be a subjective matter and could be due to a variety of reasons including specification or spending. Consideration will also be given to undertaking a Condition Survey, particularly of cricket pitches to provide reliable, quantifiable information.

The audit highlighted different usage levels of public pitches, especially for football with some of the popular sites being used extensively. This had implications for grounds maintenance at those sites, whereas other pitches were being used less frequently and were often unused at peak times.

The reasons for this imbalance included the quality of pitches and, in particular, the quality or availability of changing facilities. If further pitches are to be made available to meet future demand the capacity of less popular pitches could be improved and available resources focused on these sites.

9.1.3 Quality of Ancillary Facilities The Strategy recognises the importance of improving changing rooms and pavilions it also recognises the importance of social facilities, such as club rooms and facilities for refreshments. The poor quality of some of the changing rooms was identified during the consultation as not acceptable and a significant deterrent to participation. Identifying and improving these facilities could lead to an increased uptake in the use of the pitches, increasing supply.

The Council has a programme of ensuring that all changing rooms are bought up to the standards of accessibility required by the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) and all new facilities built in the future will be DDA-compliant.

Priorities for improvements, within the recommendations of the recent Best Value Review report, will be established. All new facilities will meet current design guidelines and will be designed to accommodate growth in women’s sport.

However, a programme of improvements will have significant capital implications, but the Council will aim to improve and develop suitable changing facilities, within available resources, and will seek external funding to support this development, where appropriate. As mentioned previously, consideration will also be given to the use of Planning Agreements (i.e. S106) to secure improvements in the quality of pitches or facilities, especially where this will result in an improved supply, in cases where proposed developments will result in an increase in the population.

There is some limited provision within the Council’s Capital Programme for improvements to Changing Rooms and improvements are planned at Marlborough Recreation Ground, Penhill Park, Mayplace and Longlands Recreation Ground, Northumberland Heath Recreation Ground and a small scale refurbishment of Slade Green changing rooms. There is also substantial funding allocated by the Council for new facilities at Hall Place (18 changing rooms, to support 9 pitches), with a planned application for additional funding to support this large capital scheme from the Football Foundation in 2005.

A clubhouse will be provided for hockey players as part of the improvements planned at Chislehurst and Sidcup School, which will be used in conjunction with the new pitch at Hurstmere School.

The changing rooms at Northumberland Heath Recreation Ground are owned by the Council and plans are currently being drawn up for improvements, in consultation with Erith RFC and proposals for its improvement will be developed, as resources allow. The Council is also working with Erith RFC and the RFU to develop an application for funding for training floodlights on the site, which already has planning permission.

The changing rooms at Old Dartfordians belong to a private club and the Council will offer support to the club in this development.

9.2 Monitor usage levels to identify changes in demand Although an attempt has been made to predict future growth in pitch-based sports, it is possible that these predicted levels could be exceeded and it is, therefore, proposed that procedures for monitoring usage of pitches are established to identify growing levels of demand.

There are a number of factors that could result in future demand outgrowing predicted levels, including: • a growth in the population above official forecasts; • growing popularity of some sports and • sports development initiatives.

These factors will impact on individual sports to a varying degree and the sports development forums are in a strong position to monitor the effects of these changes on their own sports.

It is therefore proposed the forums are encouraged to develop an active role in identifying annual changes in participation in their particular sports. This information will then be used to refine the predicted levels of demand set out in this strategy and the Council, in consultation with the forums, will be able to determine whether the level of provision can meet those changes or whether further action is required through the management and letting of its pitches or by identifying additional provision.

In the case of football, where there is no development forum at present, changes in demand will be monitored through pitch bookings and through consultation with local leagues.

9.3 Release underused facilities or develop new sites, as required

This strategy recognises that some land in the borough is currently designated as playing field, but is no longer used as such, due to issues such as its size, poor quality or location within the borough. In such circumstances, this strategy suggests that formal realignment of this land should be considered, so that it can be utilised in another way - to enable built development, for example - in line with identified strategic need.

If demand outstrips the current supply, consideration will have to be given to providing additional pitches and this is likely to require a significant capital investment.

During the audit of pitches, a number of sites have been identified that are not currently in use, because of contamination or other land issues, but which could be developed as pitches with ancillary facilities, such as changing rooms. It is therefore proposed that, in the event of additional facilities being required, consideration should be given to developing such sites for use as playing pitches.

Consideration should also be given to the development of suitable sites for multiple sports use i.e. multi-sports hubs, preferably including the provision of artificial surfaces, which would allow the facilities to be used throughout the week, rather than at peak times. Such facilities could also be used to support other community- based activities, including health centres and crèches. This would provide a cost effective solution to the provision of additional facilities.

It is also proposed that consideration be given to the use of Planning Agreements to secure additional facilities or improvements in the quality of pitches or facilities, within the Local Strategic Framework, especially where this will result in an improved supply. It is envisaged that this would be particularly appropriate in cases where proposed developments will result in an increase in the population.

In addition to developing new sites, a number of schools have indicted that they would be prepared to consider community use of their pitches and some additional facilities in schools will become available through the Big Lottery Fund ‘PE and Sport in Schools’ programme. This may provide some additional sites but the number is likely to be limited and some facilities may only be suitable for junior sports, due to their size.

10 Implementation Plan The final section comprises an Implementation Plan, which sets out the action required to address the key issues identified within this strategy to April 2008, at which time the Sports Strategy will be reviewed.

It should be noted however, that the successful achievement of the plan is reliant upon the availability of resources.

Implementation Plan to April 2008

Aims and Objectives

Action Time Lead* Resources Sustain existing level of Establish Playing Pitch Working Group 2005/06 HoL/LDM/ Existing revenue budgets provision ORM Improve existing level of 1. Work with schools to increase access Ongoing LDM Existing revenue budgets provision 2. Work with colleagues in regeneration and Ongoing HoL Developers funding planning, to ensure that S106 agreements include introduction of new pitches / ancillary facilities where appropriate 3. Identify suitable sites for new pitches and Ongoing HoL / LDM / Explore possibility of new ancillary facilities and develop a long term plan for ORM commitments within the capital redevelopment (including identification of potential programme funding streams) 4. Work with Thamesmead Town FC and other Ongoing HoL/LDM Partnership funding possibility local clubs to explore the possible development of through the Council’s Areas of facilities in the area, including exploring the Opportunity funding and the Football possibility of developing of a multi sports hub in the Foundation. Feasibility funding from borough. Trust Thamesmead. 5. Consider future review of pitch letting policy 2006/07 HoL/ ORM Internal review if considered beneficial Improve Quality of Changing Develop proposals for Hall Place 2005/06 HoL/LDM/ Approved Capital Programme Rooms Review recommendations of BVR HoPoS / Existing revenue budgets Identify sites for improvements under Football ORM Football Foundation bids to be Foundation programme submitted Identify other sources of funding for improvements On- including potential S106 agreements and agreed Going Capital programme and additional to annual capital programme be identified Monitoring and Evaluation To take into account Whole Sport Plans produced 2006/07 HoL Within existing Revenue Budgets by Governing Bodies of Sport *Key: HoL = Head of Leisure; HoPOS = Head of Parks and Open Spaces; LDM = Leisure Development Manager; ORM = Outdoor Recreation Manager

Cricket

Aims and Objectives

Action Time Lead* Resource Ensure adequacy of Pitches Cricket Development Forum to identify future needs 2005/06 HoL/HoPOS/ Within existing Revenue Budgets Annual update of supply and demand of pitches Annually LDM

Improve/monitor quality of 1. Arrange discussions with Officers, GM 2005/06 HoL/ HoPOS Within existing Revenue Budgets cricket pitches Contractors and clubs and school to discuss / ORM requirements

2. Undertake Condition Survey of park cricket 2005/06 HoPOS / Within existing Revenue Budgets pitches ORM

3. Identify quality of grounds maintenance issues 2005/06 HoPOS / Within existing Revenue Budgets ORM Maintain supply of junior Cricket Development Forum to identify further 2005/06 LDM Within existing Revenue Budgets pitches pitches which could be developed as junior sites *Key: HoL = Head of Leisure; HoPOS = Head of Parks and Open Spaces; LDM = Leisure Development Manager; ORM = Outdoor Recreation Manager

Football

Aims and Objectives

Action Time Lead Resource Reduce wear around goal Implement pilot project with moveable goal sockets 2005/06 HoPOS / Current GM budget mouths Monitor project and expand, if successful 2006/07 ORM

Establish Local Stadia for Identify suitable venues and approach site 2005/06 HoL Expected to be self-funding local finals operators

Reduce dog fouling of pitches Promote information on health issues 2005/06 HoPOS Within existing Revenue Budgets Seek support of Dog Warden Service

Monitor increasing demand Establish a Junior Football Planning Group 2005/06 HoL / ORM Within existing Revenue Budgets for junior football and minor Monitor annual changes Annually soccer Identify future demand Establish a Women’s and Girls’ Development 2005/06 LDM Within existing Revenue Budgets Forum

Identify future demand Establish an Annual Football Forum 2005/06 LDM /ORM Within existing Revenue Budgets

*Key: HoL = Head of Leisure; HoPOS = Head of Parks and Open Spaces; LDM = Leisure Development Manager; ORM = Outdoor Recreation Manager

Hockey

Aims and objectives

Action Time Lead Resource Ensure/monitor adequacy of 1. Build new pitches at Trinity and Hurstmere 2005/06 HoL/LDM NOF Funding awarded. Schemes Pitches Schools commence on site in Feb 05

2. Hockey Development Forum to identify future HoL/HoPOS/ Within existing Revenue Budgets needs Annually LDM / ORM

3. Annual update of supply and demand of pitches 4. Encourage floodlighting proposals at Erith Ongoing HoL/LDM External funding School *Key: HoL = Head of Leisure; HoPOS = Head of Parks and Open Spaces; LDM = Leisure Development Manager; ORM = Outdoor Recreation Manager

Rugby

Aims and objectives

Action Time Lead Resource Improvements at Erith RFC Investigate options for improving changing rooms 2005/06 HoL Part funding from capital programme in 05/06

Investigate options for providing floodlighting 2005/06 HoL Funding from club / Council sports grant and regional RFU (tbc) Ensure/monitor adequacy of Rugby Development Forum to identify future needs Annually HoL/HoPOS Pitches Annual update of supply and demand of pitches / LDM / ORM

*Key: HoL = Head of Leisure; HoPOS = Head of Parks and Open Spaces; LDM = Leisure Development Manager; ORM = Outdoor Recreation Manager

11 Resources This section sets out a breakdown of resources currently available for outdoor recreation and identifies potential sources for funding future developments.

11.1 Current Resources

11.1.1 Capital The Council’s Approved Capital Programme contains a recurrent programme for maintenance for pavilions and changing rooms in parks. In 2004/05 this was used to improve facilities at Penhill Park, Danson Park, Slade Green and Mayplace. Future works are being considered for Marlborough and Longlands. There is also specific provision for improvements to the changing rooms at Hall Place and Northumberland Heath Recreation Ground.

Other developments will require the preparation of Service Development Bids at the appropriate time.

11.1.2 Revenue There are existing revenue budgets for Grounds Maintenance, Staff Costs, Security and cleaning.

Predictions for the future supply of pitches, used in the development of this strategy assume that current levels of play on public pitches are maintained. However, the number of games that can be supported by a pitch depends on the standard of grounds maintenance and any reduction in maintenance could affect levels of play.

If the Council is to continue meeting demand for pitches, it should ensure that grounds maintenance programmes are continued at their existing levels and that future resources are identified to improve quality and to meet the guidelines of the governing bodies of pitch-based sports. Failure to maintain existing levels of play may result in a shortage of pitches leading to a requirement for substantial capital investment to increase supply to meet demand.

11.1.3 Revenue Implications of Capital Any new capital developments will have to be underpinned by increased revenue provision which will be identified at the appropriate time, through the service development process.

Improvements in the quality of pitches would require an increase in the grounds maintenance specification and this would have to be reflected in an increase in fees and charges, which are linked to quality.

11.1.4 Fees and Charges Income is derived from fees and charges, which could be used to cover the costs of grounds maintenance. Increases in revenue expenditure could be met by increases in the level of fees and charges and further consideration will be given at the appropriate time.

A comparison of charges for football pitch hire in the borough with Greenwich and Dartford is attached as an appendix. It shows that, whilst some of Bexley’s charges are more expensive that Dartford’s, the majority are cheaper than charges in Greenwich.

11.2 Potential Resources

11.2.1 External Funding Opportunities Sources of funding that might support improvements to facilities have been identified, including Sport England and the Football Foundation. However, it is recognised that the main lottery-based sources of funding are coming under increased pressure from the increasing number of good quality bids, declining ticket sales and long term commitments. Initial discussions with the Football Foundation have, however been very promising, and officers are now developing an application for Hall Place, with the intention of other schemes then being developed over time.

Other sources of funding may be available, especially in areas of high deprivation and these will be identified and, where appropriate, applications for funding will be made.

11.2.2 Use of Planning Agreements Section 9 outlines cases in which sites, that were not suitable for additional pitches, could be disposed. However, in cases where proposed developments will result in an increase in the population, there will be additional pressure on existing sites and this may lead to demand for further pitches.

It is proposed that consideration be given to the use of Section 106 Planning Agreements, within the Local Strategic Framework, to fund additional facilities or improvements in the quality of pitches or facilities, where this will result in an improved supply.

Appendix A

Supply of Pitches and Clubs / Leagues (as at May 2005)

1. Football

1.1 Clubs

Bexley & District Junior Football League

Mini Soccer

Club Teams Home Ground Belvedere Sports U7 (U7 East) Belvedere Sports Club U8 (U8 South) 101A Woolwich Road, SE2 0JB U8 (U8 South) U9 A (U9 B East) U9 B (U9 B East) U10 A (U10 A) U10 B (U10 C East) Bexley FC U8 (U8 East) Q.M. University College London U9 (U9 B East) Sports Ground Perry Street, Chislehurst Bexley Royals U11 (U11A) Westgate School, Summerhill Road, Dartford Crayford Arrows U7 Black (U7 E) Crayford Arrows F.C U7 Red (U7 E) Bakers Field, Perry St U8 Black (U8 S) Crayford. U8 Red (U8 S) U9 Black (U9 A) U9 (U9 A) (Penhill Park 2004/05) U10 Red (U10 A) U10 Black (U10 B E) Crook Log Boys U8 (U8 Central Penhill Park U10 (U10 B East) Foots Cray Lions U7 Red (U7 E) Penhill Park U7 (U7 E) U8 A (U8 Central) U8 B (U8 Central) U9 (U9 A) U9 B (U9 B W) U10 A (U10 A) U10 B (U10 B E) U10 C (U10 C West) U11 (U11 A) Kingfisher JFC U7 (U7 E) Bexleyheath Sports Club U8 (U8 E) Parkview Road, Welling U9 (U9 A) U10 (U10 A) U10 Colts (U10 C W) Long Lane JFC U7 lions Long Lane JFC U7 tigers Dursley Road, London SE3 U8 lions U8 tigers U9a U9b U9c U10a U10b

Club Teams Home Ground Our Lady’s Youth U7 Lions (U7 W) London Marathon Playing Fields U7 Tigers (U7 W) Shooters Hill U8 A (U8 E) U8 B (U8 E) U9 (U9 A) U9 Red (U9 B W) U9 Green (U9 C) U11 (U11 A) Parkmere FC U10 A (U10 C E) Penhill Park U10 (U10 C E) Russell Park Rangers U9 A (U9 B E) Erith School U9 B (U9 C) Ramsden Road, Erith U10 (U10 B E) Thamesmead Town U7 (U7 E) Thamesemead Town FC U8 (U8 E) Bayliss Ave, SE28 U9 A (U9 B E) U9 B (U9 C) U10 (U10 B E) U10 B (U10 C E) U11 Falcons (U11 A) VCD Athletic U9 Green (U9 B E) VCD Athletic Club U9 White (U9 C) Old Road, Crayford, Kent.l

11 – a Side

Club Teams Home Ground Acorn FC U16 B (U16 B) Hall Place, Bourne Road, Bexley

Barnehurst Rangers U11 (U11C)

Bexley F.C U14 (U14 C E) Various U15 (U15 B E) U15 (U15 C E) U17 (U17 A) Bexley Darts U11 (U11C) Penhill Park

Bexley Dynamos U14 (U14 B E) Dartford Tech. College Heath Lane, Dartford, Bexley Eagles U12 (12 B W) Meridian Sports Ground Charlton

Bexley Royals U12 (U12 D) Westgate School U13 (U13 D) Summerhill Road Dartford. U15 (U15 C E) U16 (U16 C) Belvedere Rams U14 (U14 D) U16 (U16 A) U17 (U17 B) Belvedere Sports U11 (U11 C) Belvedere Sports, Memorial U12 (U12 A) Ground, U12 (U12 B E) 101a Woolwich Road, SE2 U15 (U15 C E) U16 (U16 B E) Blackfen Pumas U13 (U13 B E) The Oaks Green Lane Eltham, SE9 Blendon Boys U12 (U12 B E) Hurstmere School, Hurst Rd, Sidcup DA15 9AW CJ’s U13 (U13 A) Birchmere Park U13 (U13 B E) Southwood Road Thamesmead Chevron JFC U14 (U14 C E) St Mary & St Joseph’s School Chislehurst Road, Sidcup

Club Teams Home Ground Crayford Arrows U11 Black (U11 A) Crayford Arrows F.C U11 Reds (U11 A) Bakers Field, Perry St U12 (U12 A) Crayford. U13 (U13 B E) U14 (U14 D E) U15 (U15 C E) (Penhill Park 2004/05) U16 (U16 B E) U17 (U17 B) Erith Town No Teams Europa 2000 U12 (U12 D E) Dartford Heath Fields Swan Lane Dartford Foots Cray Lions U11 (U11 C) Penhill Park U11 (U11 D) U12 (U12 A) U12 (U12 C W) U13 (U13 A) U13 (U13 C W) U14 (U14 C W) U15 (U15 C W) U16 (U16 B E) Grasshoppers Athletic U11 (U11 B) Brampton Primary School, Brampton Road, Bexleyheath Green Park U14 (U14 C E) Belvedere Sports U16 (U16 C W) 101a Woolwich Road. Hurst FC U12 (U12 A) North West College, Oakfield U13 (U13 C W) Lane,Wilmington

Kingfisher JFC U11 (U11 B E) Bexleyheath Sports Club U11 (U11 B E) Parkview Road, Welling U12 (U12 C E) U12 (U12 D) U13 (U13 C W) U13 (U13 D E) U16 (U16 B E) U17 (U17 B) Lakeside Colts U13 (U13 D E) Russell Park, Bexleyheath

Lessa Albion U17 (U17 C W) EDF Energy Leisure Sports Club 87-89 Footscray Road, Eltham, SE9 Lions 98 U15 (U15 B W) Long Lane U11a Long Lane JFC U11b Dursley Road, London SE3 U12a U12b U12c U13b U13c U14 U15a U15b U16a U16b Longwood U12 (U12 C East) Eltham Green School, Middle Park Avenue, Eltham SE9 New Sidcup Lions U13 (U13 C E) Coldharbour Leisure Centre

New Tudor Youth U15 (U15 B W) Tudor Sports & Social Club Butterfly Lane, SE9 Old Farm U16 (U16 B W) Crown Woods School Riefield Rd Eltham London, SE9

Club Teams Home Ground Our Lady Youth U11 (U11 A) Metrogas U12 (U12 B W) Forty Foot Lane U13 (U13 B W) Avery Hill Road U14a (U14 A) U14b (U14 C W) U15 (U15 A) U17a (U17 A) U17b (U17 C E) Oxleas Rangers U11B (U11 B E) Penhill Park

Parkmere U12a (U12 A) Bexley Borough Permits U12b (12 B E) U13 (U13 B W) U13 (U13 A) U13 (U13 C W) U14 (U14 A) U14 (U14 C W) U16 (U16 B E) Phoenix U12 (U12 B E) Mayplace Playing Fields U13a (U13 B E) Perry St, Crayford U13b (U13 C E) U14a (U14 A) U14b (U14 B E) U15 (U15 B E) U16a (U16 B E) U16b (U16 C) Real Bexley F.C U15 (U15 B W) Poly Sports & Social Club Kidbrooke Lane Eltham SE9 6TA Russell Park Rangers U12 (U12 C E) Erith School U13a (U13 C E) Ramsden Road, Erith U13b (U13 C E) U14 (U14 D E) U16 (U16 C) Russellers U13 (U13 C E) Russellers J.F.C U14 (U14 C E) Leyton Cross Rd, Wilmington, U15 (U15 C E) Kent. U17 (U17 B ) Sidcup Pumas U12 (U12 B W) Addeyans Sports Ground Blackheath, London SE3

Sidcup Spitfires U12 (U12 D) Thamesmead Town U11 (U11 A) Thamesemead Town FC U12 (U12 A) Bayliss Ave, SE28 U12 (U12 C E) Tel: 020 8311 4211 U14 (U14 B E) U15 (U15 B E) U16 (U16 B W) Three Lions 2000 U14 (U14 A) Titans U15 (U15 C E) Poly Sports & Social Club, Kidbrooke Lane, Eltham

Trojan Youth U14 (U14 C E) Russell Park, Bexleyheath VCD Athletic U12 (U12 B E) VCD Athletic Club U13 (U13 B E) Old Road, Crayford, Kent U15 (U15 A) Villacourt Rovers U12 (U12 A) Welling School, Elsa Road, U14 (U14 A) Welling U16 (U16 B W) Welling Wanderers U12 (U12 A) Welling School, Elsa Road, U13 (U13 B E) Welling U14 (U14 B E) U14 (U14 B E) U15 (U15 A) U15 (U15 C W) U16 (U16 C) Welling Youth U16 (U16 C) Danson Park Bexley, Kent

South East London and KENT League Teams

Mini Soccer Under 7 Erith + Belvedere Phoenix Sports A Phoenix Sports B Sidcup Pumas Under 8 Phoenix Fire Phoenix Flame Phoenix sports Russellers Blue Russellers Red Welling Wanderers Under 9 Phoenix Pumas Russellers Welling Wdrs Lions Welling Wdrs Tigers Under 10 Phoenix Lions Phoenix Pumas Phoenix Tigers Russellers Blue Russellers Red Sidcup Pumas Black Sidcup Pumas Red Welling Wdrs Welling Wdrs Black

11 a-side Under 11 Danson Rangers Phoenix Sports A Welling Wanderers Under 12 Boys Russellers Blue Russellers Red Welling Wanderers Under 12 Girls Crayford Arrows Long Lane A Long Lane B Phoenix Sports Sidcup Pumas

Senior League Clubs Playing In Bexley - London Leagues

Amateur Football Competition (Formerly Old Boy’s League) Old St Mary’s

Bromley and Croydon Christian League AFC Sidcup New Generation Church

Bromley and District Longlands FC Sidcup Town FC

Eltham and District Sunday League

Premier Division Footscray Lions Greenoak FC

Senior Division Footscray Lions Reserves Kings Park Rangers

Division One Hayden FC Oaklands Woolwich Catholic

Division Two AFC Rangers AFC Rose

London and Kent Border League

Senior Premier Division Convoys GSA Mottingham Forest

Senior Division 1 Woodpecker

Senior Division 2 STC Robins

Inter Division 1 Eltham Eagles GISC Intergills Kingsdale Metcrafts Russellers

Inter Division 2 Beech Tree Brewers Arms Villacourt Rovers

Junior Division 1 AFC Blackfen FC Bellegrove

Junior Division 2 Russellers Reserves

Junior Division 3 Goats United Villacourt Rovers Reserves

Metropolitan Sunday Football League

Premier Division Leabridge FC

Division 1 Belmont FC Long Lane FC

Division 2 Dartford Aces

Division 3 Welling All Stars FC

Division 4 Tullamore Rovers

Orpington and Bromley Sunday Football League There appear to be no Bexley teams in this league.

South London Football Alliance

Premier Division Cray Valley Kingfisher Long Lane Division 1 Bexley Penhill Standard

Division 2 Beaverwood

Division 3 Bexleians

Division 4 Bexley Park Beaverwood Reserves Bexleyheath Oakdale Athletic Ravens

Southern Area Sunday Football League This league has been incorporated into Croydon Municipal Sunday League There appear to be no Bexley teams in this league.

Kent Leagues

Dartford and District League

Chislehurst Reserves Duke of Wellington FC Highfield Rovers Horton Kirby Lullingstone Castle Marsean Marsean Reserves Oakfield

Dr Martens League 1

Premier Division Welling United

Eastern Division Erith and Belvedere

Kent County League

Division 1 West Belvedere

Division 2 West Phoenix Sports

Division 3 West Old Bexleians

Reserves Division 2 W Belvedere Phoenix Sports

Kent Youth League Phoenix Sports

Go Travel Kent League

Premier League Cray Wanderers Erith Town Slade Green

Thamesmead Town VCD Athletic

First Division Cray Wanderers Reserves Erith Town Reserves T’mead Town Reserves

Second Division Erith & Belvedere Res VCD Athletic Reserves

Kent Senior League There appear to be no Bexley Teams in this league.

Kent Suburban Football League

AC Star Belvedere Social Benchmark Arrows Brewer’s Arms Brightfields FC Cray Harriers Crayford Arrows Crayford Arrows Reserves Crayside Rangers Dartford Rose Grove Grove Reserves Glencoe Rangers Lotus Athletic Manorway NKOL North Heath Pinnacle Hill Royal Standard Slade Green Welling Athletic

Kent Sunday League There appears to be no Bexley teams in this league.

North Kent Sunday Cup and League Manor Kent

1.2 Sites

The following tables identify the supply of football pitches in Bexley:

Mini Soccer Pitches

Schools Private Clubs Public Pitches Hurst (2) Belvedere Sports Longlands Rec (2) Longlands Bexleyheath Sports Northumberland Heath Old Bexley (2) Thamesmead Town Penhill Park (4) VCD Athletic Crossways Park (3) Total 5 x 3 = 15 Total 4 x 3 = 12 Total 10 x 3 = 30 Each pitch is used for three time slots throughout the day on Sundays equating to 57 games.

Junior Football Pitches

Schools Private Clubs Public Pitches Primary Belvedere Sports Crossway Park Brampton Bexleyheath Sports (2) Danson Park (3) Gravel Hill Danson Youth Centre Longlands Hook Lane Phoenix Sports Penhill Old Bexley Thamesm’d Town (2) Russell Park (3) Our Lady VCD (2) Hall Place (5)* Hurst Longlands

Secondary Bexley Business Acmy Cleeve Park (3) Erith (3) Hurstmere St Columba’s Trinity Welling Total 18 x 2 = 36 Total 9 x 2 = 18 Total 9 x 2 = 18 Hall place 5 x 1 = 5

Each pitch is used for two time slots throughout the day on Sundays, with the exception of pitches in Hall Place (which are used only once), equating to a total of 77 games.

Senior Football Pitches

Schools Private Clubs Public Pitches Bexley Business Acmy Belvedere Sports (2) Danson Park (8) Cleeve Park Bexleyheath Sports Erith Rec (2) Erith School (3) Loring Hall Erith Stadium Hurstmere (2) Phoenix Sports Hall Place (9) St Columba’s Slade Green King George’s (3) St Mary & St Josephs Thamesm’d Town (2) Mayplace Rec (3) Trinity School VCD Athletic (2) North Heath Rec (3) Old St Mary’s Rec Slade Green Rec (2) Waring Park Total 10 Total 10 Total 33

2. Hockey

2.1 Clubs

There are four hockey clubs playing in the area as set out in the following table, which also identifies the team structure of each club.

Club Mini Junior Senior Vets Total Mixed M F M F M F Bexley Invicta 3 1 4 BBHC 2 2 1 6 3 1 15 Burnt Ash 2 3 3 7 5 1 1 22 RASRA 1 1 Total 4 5 4 17 9 2 1 42

2.2 Sites

Hockey pitches are available that the following sites:

No of Pitches Site ATP Grass Public Pitches Mayplace Recreation Ground 1 Private Pitches Bexley Cricket Club 3 Bexleyheath Sports Club 1 School Pitches Erith School 2 Total 3 4

NB. Hurstmere School will have a hockey pitch that will be available for community use, from late Autumn 2005.

3. Cricket

3.1 Clubs

There are six cricket focus clubs playing in the area. These are teams that are involved in the development of junior cricket and play in senior leagues. The following table lists these clubs and also the team structure of each club.

Club Junior Senior Total Belvedere CC 3 2 5 Bexley CC 6 5 11 Bexleyheath CC 2 2 4 Dartfordians CC 2 2 4 Erith CC 1 1 Sidcup CC 3 3 6 Total 16 15 31

3.2 Sites

There are a total of 19 cricket pitches available in Bexley:

Site Senior Public Pitches Hall Place 6 Waring Park 1 King George’s Recreation Ground 1 Mayplace Recreation Ground 1 Total public pitches 9 Private Pitches Belvedere CC 1 Bexley CC 1 Bexleyheath CC 1 Dartford CC 1 Sidcup CC 2 Loring Hall (University of Greenwich) 1 Total private pitches 7 Schools Chislehurst & Sidcup 1 Bexley Grammar School/Hurstmere School 2 Total schools pitches 3 Total 19

N.B. Footscray Road, the home ground of Erith CC, is outside the borough and has not been included in the calculation.

4. Rugby

4.1 Clubs

There are four rugby clubs playing in the area, as set out in the following table, which also identifies the team structure of each club.

Club Mini Junior Senior Total Mixed M F M F Bexley 6 4 4 14 Erith 1 1 3 5 Old Dartfordians 11 6 6 1 24 Sidcup 6 6 1 6 1 20 Total 24 17 1 19 2 63

4.2 Sites

Rugby pitches are available at the following sites:

Number of Pitches Site Junior Senior Total Northumberland Heath Rec (Erith RFC) 2 2 O. Dartfordians RFC (own site) 10 2 12 St Mary’s Recreation Ground (O Ds) 1 1 Sidcup RFC (own site) 4 3 7 Total 14 8 22

Appendix B

FOOTBALL PITCH CHARGES

Bexley Greenwich Dartford

Registration Fees - Adult* N/A £32.00 N/A Registration Fees - Junior* N/A £16.00 N/A

Registered Club Fees Monday- Saturday p.m. (With changing rooms) £32.87 £37.50 £28.67 Monday- Saturday p.m. (No changing rooms) £21.33 N/A N/A Sunday A.M. (with changing rooms) £40.00 £53.00 £34.67 Sunday P.M. (with changing rooms) £40.00 £37.50 £34.67 Sunday A.M. (No changing rooms) £23.33 £37.50 N/A Sunday P.M. (No changing rooms) £23.33 £28.00 N/A Casual Game £56.00 N/A £57.00

Junior (with changing rooms) N/A £40.00 N/A Junior (No changing rooms) av. W/end rate £22.33 N/A £23.83

Non- Registered Club Fees Monday- Saturday p.m. (With changing rooms) £32.87 £60.00 £28.67 Monday- Saturday p.m. (No changing rooms) £21.33 £40.00 N/A Sunday A.M. (with changing rooms) £40.00 £85.00 £34.67 Sunday P.M. (with changing rooms) £40.00 £63.00 £34.67 Sunday A.M. (No changing rooms) £23.33 £40.00 N/A Sunday P.M. (No changing rooms) £23.33 £39.00 N/A Casual Game

Junior (with changing rooms) N/A £32.00 N/A Junior (No changing rooms) av. W/end rate £22.33 N/A £23.83

Deposit on Equipment N/A N/A £52.00

* Greenwich operate a registered club system