DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment ORIGINAL REPORT Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of 60 Residential Lots Proposed on Part of Lots 2, 3, & 4, Concession 9 Part of Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Concession 8 Geographic Township of Radcliffe Township of Madawaska Valley County of Renfrew in northcentral Ontario. Report Author: Dave Norris Woodland Heritage Northwest 134 College St. Thunder Bay, ON P7A 5J5 p: (807) 632-9893 e: [email protected] Project Information Location: Lot 2 and 3 CON 8 and Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 of the Township of Madawaska Valley PIF P307-0070-2017 Proponent Information: Mr. Neil Enright National Fur Farms Inc. 118 Annie Mayhew Road Combermere, Ontario K0J 1L0 Tel: (480) 363-6558 E-Mail: [email protected] Report Completed: June 1, 2017 Report Submitted: June 7, 2017 Executive Summary National Fur Farms Inc. in Combermere, Ontario contracted Woodland Heritage Services to conduct a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of their property located on Part of Lots 2, 3 and 4 CON 9 and Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 CON 8 of the Township of Madawaska Valley, in the county of Renfrew in northcentral Ontario. The proponent is planning on subdividing the property into 60 residential lots. The archaeological assessment was undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990), the Planning Act, and the Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists (2011). All archaeological consulting activities were performed under the Professional Archaeological Licence of Dave Norris (P307). The Subject property is situated in the Canadian Shield (Section 1.3.3, Standard 1). This project involves the purchase of land whereby previous activities on the subject property include seasonal camping and RV park in lots 2 and 3 on CON 9 and a private airstrip located in the southern portion on lots 2 and 3 CON 8. The property is bordered by the Madawaska River to the immediate south and includes shorelines associated with Green Lake to the north. There is approximately 230 m of beach located on the southwestern portion of the subject property that was utilized by the commercial camp and the area is dotted by various accommodations such as cottages, RV and tenting camp spaces and Pod “Glamping” structures which consist of a wooden frame that include a bed and indoor living space. Proposed changes include the development of cottages along the river area for more permanent living. No physical inspection of the property was carried out; therefore, interpretations of archaeological potential are based on the review of background research, information from mapping sources and plans for the proposed development. Recommendations for further assessment area as follows: • That Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment be carried out on the subject property within areas of the permanent water sources as outlined in section 2.1.5 of the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (MTCS 2011) (highlighted in Figure 6 of this report) • Stage 1 physical inspection should be carried out within the remaining portions of the property to determine archaeological potential not evident from the supplied maps • Both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 archaeological assessments should be conducted by a consultant archaeologist licenced by the province of Ontario, and should adhere to Section 2.1.5 in the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (2011 MTCS:35) • All test pits, excavated during the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment, must at least 30 cm in diameter, with the excavation of each test pit, by hand, into the first 5 cm of subsoil to examine the pit for stratigraphy, cultural features, or evidence of. The soils should be screened through mesh no greater than 6 mm. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Project Personnel .................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Project Context .......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Development Context ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Historical Context ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Historical Documentation ....................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Pre-Contact Period ................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Archaeological Context ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4.1 Current Conditions ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4.2 Physiography ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.4.3 Previous Archaeological Assessments ..................................................................................... 8 1.4.4 Registered Archeological Sites ................................................................................................ 8 1.4.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.0 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Determining Archaeological Potential .......................................................................................... 9 3.0 Analysis and Conclusions ............................................................................................... 10 4.0 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 10 5.0 Advice on Compliance with Legislation ........................................................................... 10 6.0 Bibliography and References .......................................................................................... 12 7.0 Maps ............................................................................................................................. 15 List of Maps Map 1. General Location of proposed development in northcentral Ontario. ............................. 15 Map 2. Close-up imagery of proposed development and surrounding terrain. ........................... 15 Map 3. Location of property under Stage 1 archaeological review. .............................................. 16 Map 4. Property index map outlining Lots 2 and 3 of Concession 9. ............................................. 16 Map 5. Property index map highlighting Lots 2 and 3 of Concession 8. ........................................ 17 Map 6. Proposed development with areas requiring Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment (highlighted in yellow)................................................................................................................ 17 Project Personnel Field Director Dave Norris (P307) Archival Research Dave Norris (P307) Mapping Dave Norris (P307) Report Preparation Dave Norris (P307) Report Reviewer Arlene Lahti M. Sc. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Lots 2 and 3 CON8, Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 in the Township of Madawaska /1 Valley, Township of Renfrew © 2017 Woodland Heritage Northwest. All rights reserved 1.0 Project Context 1.1 Objectives The objectives of a Stage 1 archaeological assessment, as outlined by the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (2011 MTCS), are as follows: • To provide information about the property’s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land condition; • To evaluate in detail the property’s archaeological potential, which will support recommendations for Stage 2 survey for all or parts of the property if required; and • To recommend appropriate strategies for Stage 2 survey if necessary The Stage 1 assessment can include a physical property inspection if possible and is highly recommended to determine the current land condition. 1.2 Development Context National Fur Farms Inc. in Combermere, Ontario contracted Woodland Heritage Services to conduct a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of their property located on Lot 2 and 3 CON 8 and Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 of the Township of Madawaska Valley, in the county of Renfrew in northcentral Ontario. This project involves the purchase of land whereby previous activities on the subject property include seasonal camping and RV park in lots 2 and 3 on CON 9 and a private airstrip located in the southern portion on lots 2 and 3 CON 8. The property is bordered by the Madawaska River to the immediate south and includes shorelines associated with Green Lake to the north. There is approximately 230 m of beach located on the southwestern portion of the subject property that was utilized by the commercial camp and the area is dotted by various accommodations such as cottages, RV and tenting camp spaces and Pod “Glamping” structures which consist of a wooden frame that include a bed and indoor living space. Proposed changes include the development of cottages along the river area for more permanent living. 1.3 Historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bonnechere River System W Y LER L IL I M E R Deep River D Lac Lac Mcdonald Sheen Dam Stream/River BAGGS RD Kean H !N Lake U N
    ! ! ! ! LAMURE RD Lac Esher RB ME A BAL Lac des Îles Head, Clara BANTING DR Y North G R U D T Lac Rouge & Maria Z M à l'Oiseau Lake A N R D BR ON SO N R D Lac LEADER RD Lackey D R Explore the Bonnechere River System W Y LER L IL I M E R Deep River D Lac Lac McDonald Sheen Dam Stream/River BAGGS RD Kean H !n Lake U N D T S R KINGS RD R Perch N D Lake B Bridge Bonnechere River System A )" OT E T AWA K S T Lac à la Truite ! Emm a LAW RD RAILWAYPLANT ST RD Communities Water Lake ! Chalk River S MAIN ST A N D Sturgeon Algonquin Park R County Road D Lake CART IER LAKE RD Young Corry Lake Lake Rorke C DELU RD LOUT THIER Provincial Park Lake HIER R Lac Provincial Highway D Hurdman D R Federal Land Lake E Municipal Maintained Road S C Travers W R L M A O D E E M S D H R R NE R P E ELI E AS I B D N S C L First Nation Reserve T S A I Municipal Seasonal Maintained Road A A A P R N K Y L B R E K RD A IN D K R L E D R D Eganville Cartier M Private Road ID Lake D L E Centre Lake R D Crown Road Municipal Boundary ORANGE RD B P A A RD T D E T S ALIZ S R TOT MESSER TRAIL L E C D H Roads Outside County E R R E S D E N R K A D O L A H R E E E L Lac Tucker K E C C CREST RD Allumette Lac H ickey Sopw ith A Lake U R T R Lake D VERITABLE RD Clemow Lake ARRAS RD D Garrison R ! Petawawa E Laurentian Y M P Lac M R E Hart Ro wan Lake O S Hills S B LVD Lac Noir IA ST TOR Petawawa VIC EAST ST D ! Petawawa ! LAURENTIAN DR R D JAN DR Lac E R Lily Lac S RD E E G NS Bellemare R T A MA T UET T HER O Q R PA PETAWAWA O CHAD ST Grand Lake H RD P P E E TERRACEPROVINCIAL T C Z A Lac du Bois Dur T PARK G A N C W A MURPHY RD A E L R R A N W R N L R LA BARRON SH IR A V H AM BA N L AC L L I E A TIMM RD RIVERPROVINCIAL SS A R A D B I S GUTZMAN RD ! MURPHY RD S D PARK ! L Québec R R T V KE L D T Barron A Black Bay E R L OELKE ST D T EY N Lac URV N Lake S BL D I ACK H R O Coulonge B O CK P AY SA C R BLACK BAY RD P L D K E I RADTKE RD M N R YA DORAN RD KA D B S TRAIL USKIE D KOSS LN RD White RD R R S RIVE Partridge ER SHADY LN M BRUMM RD St.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Stage 1
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development Prepared for: Kevin Mooder Jp2g Consultants Inc. 1150 Morrison Dr, Suite 410 Ottawa, ON K2H 8S9 Phone: 613-828-7800 Fax: 613- email:[email protected] Prepared by: Cameron Heritage Consulting 5021-25 Civic Centre Road Petawawa, ON K8H 0B1 Phone (613) 281-3838 email: [email protected] C.H.C. Project #2017011A PIF Number:P371-0017-2017 Courtney Cameron (License Number P371) ORIGINAL REPORT March 2, 2018 Cameron Heritage Consulting Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was completed under the scope of the Planning Act in preparation for the construction of a housing development in Renfrew, ON. The Proposed Development Area (PDA) is located within Lot 14 Concession 1, Horton Township (Geo.), Town of Renfrew, County of Renfrew, Ontario. The PDA is approximately 15 ha and is bounded on the southwest by an old rail bed, to the southeast and northeast by the backyards of houses along Aberdeen Street, Mason Avenue and McAndrew Ave, and to the northwest an agricultural field. The Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment included consultation with local heritage organizations, reviews of aerial imagery, archaeological potential maps, national topographic maps, physiographic maps and early maps of the area. In addition, information regarding known archaeological sites in the vicinity, land grants, and historical reference books for the PDA was reviewed. A site visit to assess archaeological potential was conducted November 29, 2017. Based upon the review of background material and the site visit, there are areas with and without potential for the presence of archaeological resources within the PDA.
    [Show full text]
  • RECREATIONAL Geologyin
    ~11,000 YEARS-AGO ~11,000 YEARS-AGO ~18,000 MILLION-YEARS-AGO ~500 MILLION-YEARS-AGO ~850 More information at the Ottawa Valley lookout and interpretative sign near Foymount. near sign interpretative and lookout Valley Ottawa the at information More context. for shown are cities and rivers present-day of Locations Get the whole picture! whole the Get Opeongo Rd Opeongo FOYMOUNT a Graben a Cross-section of of Cross-section RECREATIONAL About Mineral Collecting THE SIGNATURE EXPERIENCE OF RECREATIONAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGY in the Essentials Hobby mineral-collecting in Ontario is a privilege, not a right, so there are In a Rockhound’s Backpack some rules to be aware of. The Mineral Collecting Policy of Ontario is the Taken, in part, from Mineral Collecting in Ontario: a Guide for Rockhounds Madawaska legislation that governs this activity, and the Central Canadian Federation Mineral collecting requires little in the way of equipment apart from an FOSSILS IN EGANVILLE, #14 AND 15 ON THE MAP of Mineral Societies Code of Ethics provides additional guidelines. interest in rocks and a love for the outdoors. There are a few pieces of gear Please familiarize yourself with these best practices before you go off in that will allow a rockhound to collect and protect a wider range of samples. Valley search of your very own buried treasure. BASIC GEAR LOCATIONS, MAP AND INFORMATION FOR ROCKHOUNDS • Geologist’s pick, mason’s hammer • Sturdy boots or shoes Where to Look or small sledge hammer (no open toes) In addition to the public collecting sites listed here, you can find great • Prybar and chisels (1/2-inch to • Notebook, to record your findings potential to explore just about anywhere in the region (anywhere there’s 1-inch) rock to be seen), including plenty of freely accessible crown land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the Township of Bonnechere Valley Minutes Committee Meeting Via Zoom Conferencing Tuesday March 16, 2021 1:30 P.M
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BONNECHERE VALLEY MINUTES COMMITTEE MEETING VIA ZOOM CONFERENCING TUESDAY MARCH 16, 2021 1:30 P.M. PRESENT Mayor Jennifer Murphy Deputy Mayor Tim Schison Councillor Merv Buckwald Councillor Brent Patrick Councillor Jack Roesner CAO Annette Gilchrist Deputy CAO Sandra Barr REGRETS None GALLERY 8 CALL TO ORDER COMMITTEE MEETING Chair, Brent Patrick called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA MOVED BY Merv Buckwald That: the agenda be accepted as presented. Carried PECUNIARY INTEREST OR GENERAL NATURE THEREOF – None Declared APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOVED BY Tim Schison That: the Minutes of the Committee Meeting on March 2, 2021 be accepted as presented. Carried DELEGATIONS None REPORTS Recreation and Culture Kevin McGrath, Manager of Recreation and Culture, was present and gave his report. a) Arena – Moving from green Covid-19 zone to a yellow zone did not affect the arena. The Jr B. Wolves are playing Arnprior for controlled scrimmages, with 50 spectators in the stands and up to fourteen in the Eagle’s Nest. Valley Storm teams are playing controlled games with Renfrew and Muskrat as their bubble. Barry’s Bay minor hockey players are coming down and joining Eganville minor hockey for practices. Public Skating continues with a range of fifteen to twenty- five participating. Cobden, Arnprior and Petawawa are removing their ice on March 28th; b) The outdoor rink is done for season and the lights have been turned off; c) Emma Normoyle completed her Standard First Aid Course; d) Kevin McGrath attended the Renfrew County Recreation meeting about the Ontario Winter Games, vaccinations, and summer recreation programs; e) Recreation summer student jobs have been posted.
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Current Map Listing
    Country (full-text) State (full-text) State Abbreviation County Lake Name Depth (X if no Depth info) Argentina Argentina (INT) Rio de la Plata (INT) Rio de la Plata (From Buenos Aires to Montevideo) Aruba Aruba (INT) Aruba (INT) Aruba Australia Australia (INT) Australia (Entire Country) (INT) Australia (Entire Country) Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Fraser Island Australia Australia (INT) Cape York Peninsula (INT) Great Barrier Reef (Cape York Peninsula) Australia Australia (INT) New South Wales (INT) Kurnell Peninsula Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Moreton Island Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Greenwich to Point Piper) Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Olympic Park to Watsons Bay) Australia Australia (INT) Victoria (INT) Warrnambool Australia Australia (INT) Whitsunday Islands (INT) Whitsunday Islands Austria Austria (INT) Vorarlberg (INT) Lake Constance Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Abaco Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Elbow Cay (INT) Elbow Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Eleuthera Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Exuma Cays (Staniel Cay with Bitter Guana Cay and Guana Cay South) Bahamas Bahamas (INT) The Exumas (INT) Great Exuma and Little Exuma Islands Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Long Island and Ruma Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) New Providence (INT) New Providence Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) San Salvador Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Waderick Wells Cay (INT) Waderick Wells Cay Barbados Barbados (INT) Barbados (Lesser Antilles)
    [Show full text]
  • Settler Colonialism and the Failed-Settlement Narrative in the Ottawa-Huron Tract, 1850–1910
    A “Colony of Unrequited Dreams”? Settler Colonialism and the Failed-Settlement Narrative in the Ottawa-Huron Tract, 1850–1910 by Derek Murray B.A. (Honours), University of Guelph, 2007 M.A., University of Guelph, 2009 G.Cert., Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, University of Victoria, 2014 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Derek Murray, 2018 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee A “Colony of Unrequited Dreams”? Settler Colonialism and the Failed-Settlement Narrative in the Ottawa-Huron Tract, 1850–1910 by Derek Murray B.A. (Honours), University of Guelph, 2007 M.A., University of Guelph, 2009 G.Cert., Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, University of Victoria, 2014 Supervisory Committee Dr. Eric W. Sager, Supervisor Department of History Dr. Lynne S. Marks, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. Peter A. Baskerville, Outside Member Department of History and Classics, University of Alberta iii Abstract In the 1850s, the government of Canada West initiated a project to colonize a vast region of the Canadian Shield known as the Ottawa-Huron Tract. Later, in his influential interpretation, Arthur Lower argued the myth of the inexorable forward movement of the settlement frontier was here shattered by a reality of lakes, rocks, and forest inherently unsuitable for farming. This refrain continues to be repeated by proponents of what I call the failed-settlement narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission from the Algonquins of Ontario Mémoire Des
    CMD 18-M48.12 File/dossier : 6.02.04 Date : 2018-11-27 Edocs pdf : 5721870 Written submission from the Mémoire des Algonquins of Ontario Algonquins de l’Ontario In the Matter of À l’égard de Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Rapport de surveillance réglementaire des Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned mines et usines de concentration d’uranium et Sites in Canada: 2017 des sites historiques et déclassés au Canada : 2017 Commission Meeting Réunion de la Commission December 12, 2018 Le 12 décembre 2018 Review of CNSC Regulatory Oversight Report: Uranium Mines, Mills, Historic, and Decommissioned Sites in Canada (2017) Algonquins of Ontario Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................i Contents ..........................................................................................................................................i Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 Core Issues and Accommodations for the AOO .......................................................... 6 Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Heritage Considerations ................................. 13 General Comments & Accommodations ................................................................... 17 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 22 6.0 References
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3 Highlights in the Settlement History of Renfrew County
    OTTAWA RIVER COMMUNITY HERITAGE 218 5.3 Highlights in the Settlement History of Renfrew County Len Hopkins Co‐Chair, Ottawa River Heritage Designation Committee Renfrew County follows the Ottawa River from Arnprior all the way to the Township of Head, Clara and Maria upriver from Rolphton. It is the largest county in Ontario. Before human presence, the Champlain Sea stretched as far inland as Deep River. The original shoreline of the Champlain Sea passes through Petawawa. The modern settlement history of Renfrew County begins with today’s Arnprior, Braeside, and McNab along the Ottawa River. In 1825, McNab Township included today’s Arnprior, Braeside, and McNab. It consisted of a strip of land about six miles wide along Lac des Chats (Shaw), which was a deep clay deposit dating from the Champlain Sea. While much of McNab Township had excellent agricultural land, in parts of the township the surface was a challenge to farm. Chief Archibald McNab, the 13th Chief of Clan McNab, immigrated from Killin, Scotland, to Upper Canada in 1823. He then went to York (later Toronto), the provincial capital and proposed to the Government that he settle a township with his clansmen. The Laird of McNab was given directions to a surveyed township which he later called McNab. The Laird himself was granted 1200 acres. He then wrote to his cousin in Scotland, Dr. Hamilton, to send out settlers. Laird McNab built Kinnell Lodge near the mouth of the Madawaska River, in today’s Town of Arnprior. Later he built Waba Cottage at White Lake, which has been restored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bonnechere Cultural Heritage Project
    Social Science Research in Parks and Protected Areas 31 THE BONNECHERE CULTURAL HERITAGE PROJECT Jim Fraser Park Superintendent Bonnechere Provincial Park, Ontario Parks Box 220, Pembroke, ON K8A 6X4 Phone: (613) 757-2103 [email protected] ABSTRACT In August 1994, a number of avocational, academic, museum, consulting and government archaeolo- gists joined with writer/historian Rory MacKay, representatives from the Ontario Archaeological Society, the Algonquins’ of Golden Lake First Nation and Ontario Parks staff to discuss their interests in the region’s cultural heritage. Five days of think tank sessions on the history and archaeology of the Bonnechere proved to be an excellent forum for the rich exchange of information, ideas and theories about cultural resource protection. From this was born, the Bonnechere Cultural Heritage Project, whose team efforts have provided public archaeology programs at Basin Depot, Lafleur Homestead, Egan Farm and the mouth of the Bonnechere at Round Lake. While not every archaeological site or proj- ect is suitable for public visitation and/or participation, the discipline of archaeology as a whole bene- fits from the public’s exposure to the science of archaeology. This presentation will review: 1) the impor- tance of partnering; 2) findings of the digs to date; and, 3) the role of the public in archaeology. INTRODUCTION “On our way up the stream, we repeatedly found it almost entirely blocked up with square timber, sometimes for miles together.” (Alexander Murray, Geological Survey of Canada, 1853) Rising from the gentle waters of McKaskill and North Branch Lakes in Algonquin Provincial Park, the Bonnechere River meanders for approximately 145 km in a southeast direction where it enters the Ottawa River.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Renfrew Flood Preparation and Recovery
    County of Renfrew Flood Preparation and Recovery Emergency Services County of Renfrew Head, Clara & Maria Watersheds Deep River Laurentian Hills Petawawa Pembroke Laurentian Valley Whitewater Region Killaloe, Hagarty North Algona & Richards Wilberforce Madawaska Valley Algonquins of Pikwakanagan Horton Bonnechere Valley Renfrew Admaston/Bromley McNab/Braeside Arnprior Brudenell, Lyndoch & Raglan Greater Madawaska Bonnechere River Watershed Central Ottawa - Mississippi Watershed Madawaska River Watershed Muskrat, Indian, Westmeath Watershed Petawawa-Barron Watershed and Upper Renfrew County Watershed Produced by: This map is illustrative only. Do not rely on it as being a County of Renfrew Development and Property Department precise indicator of routes, locations of features, nor as 9 International Drive a guide to navigation. Pembroke, Ontario K8A 6W5 March 21, 2019 Sources: 0 5 10 20 30 40 Base Data: With Data supplied under Licence by Members of the © 2019, County of Renfrew km Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange & County of Renfrew ± Projection: UTM NAD83 Zone 18 2 Table of Contents SECTION ONE BEFORE THE FLOOD .......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Make a Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Flood Preparation Instructions .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Building an Emergency
    [Show full text]
  • Bonnechere River Water Management Plan
    Bonnechere River Water Management Plan September 2004 Amended March 2005 Amended March 2009 Amended December 2009 Amended September 2014 WATER MANAGEMENT PARTNERS The following waterpower operators are responsible for the implementation of the Bonnechere River Water Management Plan: RENFREW POWER GENERATION INC. MULTISTREAM POWER CORPORATION EGANVILLE GENERATION CORPORATION VORNWEG WATERPOWER Copies of this water management plan are available for viewing at the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources office at 31 Riverside Drive in Pembroke, and through each of the waterpower companies listed above. PDF copies are available through each of the waterpower companies listed above and through the Ministry of Natural Resources in Pembroke, and from the Renfrew Power Generation web site: www.renfrewpg.ca For more information on waterpower and water management planning in Ontario see the Ministry of Natural Resources renewable energy website: www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/Renewable Bonnechere River Water Management Plan September 2004 Amended March 2005 Amended March 2009 Amended March 2009 Amended September 2014 The development of the Bonnechere River Water Management Plan was supported and partially funded by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Table Of Contents Approvals and Amendments Pages I. Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................1 II. Technical Terms, Units of Measure, Abbreviations and Typographical Cues ..........................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Township North Algona Wilberforce
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BONNECHERE VALLEY BY-LAW NO. 2014-015 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE FIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP OF BONNECHERE VALLEY AND THE NORTH ALGONA WILBERFORCE TOWNSHIP WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Bonnechere Valley deems it expedient to enter into a Fire Agreement with North Algona Wilberforce Township. NOW THEREFORE the Corporation of the Township of Bonnechere Valley enacts as follows: 1. THAT the Mayor, or his or her designate, and the Chief Administrative Officer, or his or her designate, be and they are hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Township of Bonnechere Valley the agreement attached hereto and marked as Schedule “A” to this by-law. 2. THAT this by-law shall come into force and take effect upon the date of the final passing thereof. BE READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 18 th DAY OF MARCH 2014 BE DEEMED READ A THIRD TIME AND PASSED THIS 18 th DAY OF MARCH 2014 _________________________________ ____________________________ Mayor Jennifer Murphy CAO Bryan Martin SCHEDULE A FIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BONNECHERE VALLEY (Hereinafter called “Bonnechere Valley”) and NORTH ALGONA WILBERFORCE TOWNSHIP (Hereinafter called “North Algona Wilberforce”) WHEREAS By-laws have been duly enacted by the Corporate parties hereto respectively, pursuant to the provisions of Section 20 (1), of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 to authorize an agreement between the said parties relative to the use of certain fire fighting equipment of the said TOWNSHIP OF BONNECHERE VALLEY within the described “Fire Area” of the said NORTH ALGONA WILBERFORCE TOWNSHIP.
    [Show full text]