DOCSLIB.ORG

Area and Population 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Area and Population 1 AREA AND POPULATION 1. AREA AND POPULATION This section includes abstract of available data on area and population of the Indian Union based on the decadal Census of population. Table 1.1 This table contains data on area, total population and its classification according to sex and urban and rural population. In the Census, urban area is defined as follows (a) All statutory towns i.e. all places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee etc. (b) All other places which satisfy the following criteria: (i) a minimum population of 5,000. (ii) at least 75 per cent of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and (iii) a density of population of at least 400 persons per sq.km. (1000 per sq. mile) Besides, Census of India has included in consultation with State Governments/ Union Territory Adminis- trations, some places having distinct urban charactristics as urban even if such places did not strictly satisfy all the criteria mentioned under category (b) above. Such marginal cases include major projec colonies, areas of intensive industrial development, railway colonies, important tourist centres etc In the case of Jammu and Kashmir, the population figures exclude information on area under unlawfu occupation of Pakistan and China where Census could not be undertaken. Table 1.2 The table shows State-wise area and population by district-wise of Census, 2001 Table 1.3 This table gives state-wise decennial population enumerated in eleven Censuses from 1901 to 2001. Table 1.4 This table gives state-wise population decennial percentage variations enumerated in ten Censuses from 1901 to 1991. Table 1.5 This table presents data on birth rate, death rate and infant mortality rate by residence as revealed by Sample Registration System. Table 1.6 This table shows the rankings of the States and Union Territories in descending order of population and area Table 1.7 This table presents the economic classification of the population. Table 1.8 Expectation of male and female lives at birth and at ages 10,20,30,40,50, 60 and 70+ years in the various years for all India is shown in the table. Table 1.9 The table shows the population accordingly to numerically important religious communities of India viz Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains with the percentage increase duirng 1991-2001. Other religions have been collectively presented under 'others'. Table 1.10 The figures in this table represent the population and percentage distribution of members of Scheduled Castes ans Scheduled Tribes in States and Union Terriotories. Table 1.11 This table shows State-wise estimated mid-year population for the years 1991 to 2005. Population fo 1991 to 2000 has been estimated on the basis of Final Population Totals,Paper-1 of 2001, Census of India,2001. Population for 2001 to 2003 has been projected on the basis of Paper 1 of Census of India. 2001. Table 1.12 This table shows sex-wise population of cites as per census 2001 Table 1.13 This table shows as per census 2001, population of towns by classes (I-VI) and villages in India. Towns are classified according to population as below:- Class I - One lakh and above Class II - 50,000 to 99,999 Class III -20,000 to 49,999 Class IV - 10,000 to 19,999 Class V - 5,000 to 9,999 Class VI - Under 5,000 Table 1.14 This table shows as per census 2001, the number of villages, towns, households, population and area 1 2 AREA AND POPULATION TABLE 1.1- AREA AND POPULATION BY STATES (Census-2001) Population India/ State/ Area in Union Territory sq. kms. Males Females Persons Rural Urban (M) (F) (P) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 INDIA (1) ++ 3287263* 532223090+ 496514346+ 1028737436+ 742617747+ 286119689+ State: Andhra Pradesh 275045 38527413 37682594 76210007 55401067 20808940 Arunachal Pradesh 83743 579941 518027 1097968 870087 227881 Assam 78438 13777037 12878491 26655528 23216288 3439240 Bihar 94163 43243795 39754714 82998509 74316709 8681800 Chhattisgarh 135191 10474218 10359585 20833803 16648056 4185747 Goa 3702 687248 660420 1347668 677091 670577 Gujarat 196024 26385577 24285440 50671017 31740767 18930250 Haryana 44212 11363953 9780611 21144564 15029260 6115304 Himachal Pradesh 55673 3087940 2989960 6077900 5482319 595581 Jammu & Kashmir (1) ++ 222236 5360926 4782774 10143700 7627062 2516638 Jharkhand 79714 13885037 13060792 26945829 20952088 5993741 Karnataka 191791 26898918 25951644 52850562 34889033 17961529 Kerala 38863 15468614 16372760 31841374 23574449 8266925 Madhya Pradesh 308245 31443652 28904371 60348023 44380878 15967145 Maharashtra 307713 50400596 46478031 96878627 55777647 41100980 Manipur + 22327 1161952 1131944 2293896 1717928 575968 Meghalaya 22429 1176087 1142735 2318822 1864711 454111 Mizoram 21081 459109 429464 888573 447567 441006 Nagaland 16579 1047141 942895 1990036 1647249 342787 Orissa 155707 18660570 18144090 36804660 31287422 5517238 Punjab 50362 12985045 11373954 24358999 16096488 8262511 Rajasthan 342239 29420011 27087177 56507188 43292813 13214375 Sikkim 7096 288484 252367 540851 480981 59870 Tamil Nadu 130058 31400909 31004770 62405679 34921681 27483998 Tripura 10486 1642225 1556978 3199203 2653453 545750 Uttar Pradesh 240928 87565369 78632552 166197921 131658339 34539582 Uttarakhand 53483 4325924 4163425 8489349 6310275 2179074 West Bengal 88752 41465985 38710212 80176197 57748946 22427251 Union Territory: A.& N.Islands 8249 192972 163180 356152 239954 116198 Chandigargh 114 506938 393697 900635 92120 808515 D.& N.Haveli 491 121666 98824 220490 170027 50463 Daman & Diu 112 92512 65692 158204 100856 57348 Delhi 1483 7607234 6243273 13850507 944727 12905780 Lakshadweep 32 31131 29519 60650 33683 26967 Pondicherry 479 486961 487384 974345 325726 648619 Source: Office of Registrar General of India, Ministry of Home Affairs * The area figures of States and U.T's do not add up to area of India because : (i) The shortfall of 7 square km. area of Madhya Pradesh and 3 square km. area of Chhattisgarh is yet to be resolved by the Survey of India. ( ii ) Disputed area of 13 square km. between Pondicherry and Andhra Pradesh is neither included in Pondicherry nor in Andhra Pradesh. (1) The population figures excludes population of the area under unlawful occupation of Pakistan and China where Census could not be taken. ++ Area figures includes the area under unlawaful occupation of Pakistan and China. The area includes 78,114 sq.km under illegal occupation of Pakistan, 5,180 sq. km.illegally handed over by Pakistan to China and 37,555 sq.km. under illegal occupation of China. + The population of India, Manipur State and Senapati District by sex includes estimated population and excludes the households of Mao Maram, Paomata and Purul sub divisions, as the census results for 2001 Census for these sub divsions were cancelled due to administrative and technical reasons. 3 AREA AND POPULATION Table 1.2 Area and Population By Districts ( Census 2001 ) India/ State/ Union Area in sq. km.Population Decennial Rural/Urban as Population Territory/ District _______________________________ Growth Rate Percentage of Total 1991 Census P M F of Population Population Rural Urban (1991-2001) 123456789 INDIA ++ * 3287263.00* 1028737436+ 532223090+ 496514346+ 21.11 72.19 27.81 849,421,039 ANDHRA PRADESH 275045.00 76210007 38527413 37682594 14.59 72.70 27.30 66508008 Adilabad 16105.00 2488003 1250958 1237045 19.47 73.47 26.53 2,082,479 Nizamabad 7956.00 2345685 1162905 1182780 15.12 81.89 18.11 2,037,621 Karimnagar 11823.00 3491822 1747968 1743854 14.96 80.56 19.44 3,037,486 Medak 9700.00 2670097 1352446 1317651 17.64 85.64 14.36 2,269,800 Hyderabad 217.00 3829753 1981173 1848580 21.74 0.00 100.00 3,145,939 Rangareddi 7493.00 3575064 1839227 1735837 40.09 45.80 54.20 2,551,966 Mahbubnagar 18432.00 3513934 1782340 1731594 14.20 89.43 10.57 3,077,050 Nalgonda 14240.00 3247982 1651990 1595992 13.88 86.68 13.32 2,852,092 Warangal 12846.00 3246004 1644895 1601109 15.15 80.80 19.20 2,818,832 Khammam 16029.00 2578927 1305543 1273384 16.39 80.19 19.81 2,215,809 Srikakulam 5837.00 2537593 1260020 1277573 9.33 89.02 10.98 2,321,126 Vizianagaram 6539.00 2249254 1119541 1129713 6.55 81.67 18.33 2,110,943 Visakhapatnam 11161.00 3832336 1930197 1902139 16.66 60.05 39.95 3,285,092 East Godavari 10807.00 4901420 2459640 2441780 7.93 76.50 23.50 4,541,222 West Godavari 7742.00 3803517 1910038 1893479 8.13 80.26 19.74 3,517,568 Krishna 8727.00 4187841 2117401 2070440 13.22 67.92 32.08 3,698,833 Guntur 11391.00 4465144 2250279 2214865 8.72 71.20 28.80 4,106,999 Prakasam 17626.00 3059423 1552332 1507091 10.88 84.72 15.28 2,759,166 Nellore 13076.00 2668564 1344935 1323629 11.55 77.55 22.45 2,392,260 Cuddapah 15359.00 2601797 1318093 1283704 14.58 77.41 22.59 2,270,720 Kurnool 17658.00 3529494 1796214 1733280 18.72 76.84 23.16 2,973,024 Anantapur 19130.00 3640478 1859588 1780890 14.45 74.74 25.26 3,180,863 Chittoor 15151.00 3745875 1889690 1856185 14.86 78.35 21.65 3,261,118 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 83743.00 1097968 579941 518027 27.00 79.25 20.75 864558 Tawang 2172.00 38924 21846 17078 37.60 78.48 21.52 28,287 West Kameng 7422.00 74599 42542 32057 32.22 91.03 8.97 56,421 East Kameng 4134.00 57179 28802 28377 13.46 73.76 26.24 50,395 Papum Pare 3462.00 122003 64184 57819 67.56 49.15 50.85 72,811 Lower Subansiri 9548.00 98244 49542 48702 18.13 87.39 12.61 83,167 Upper Subansiri 7032.00 55346 28240 27106 10.50 71.53 28.47 50,086 West Siang 8325.00 103918 54349 49569 15.55 79.68 20.32 89,936 East Siang 3603.00 87397 45265 42132 21.61 74.87 25.13 71,864 Upper Siang 6590.00 33363 18057 15306
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Area and Population
    1. AREA AND POPULATION This section includes abstract of available data on area and population of the Indian Union based on the decadal Census of population. Table 1.1 This table contains data on area, total population and its classification according to sex and urban and rural population. In the Census, urban area is defined as follows: (a) All statutory towns i.e. all places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee etc. (b) All other places which satisfy the following criteria: (i) a minimum population of 5,000. (ii) at least 75 per cent of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and (iii) a density of population of at least 400 persons per sq.km. (1000 per sq. mile) Besides, Census of India has included in consultation with State Governments/ Union Territory Adminis- trations, some places having distinct urban charactristics as urban even if such places did not strictly satisfy all the criteria mentioned under category (b) above. Such marginal cases include major project colonies, areas of intensive industrial development, railway colonies, important tourist centres etc. In the case of Jammu and Kashmir, the population figures exclude information on area under unlawful occupation of Pakistan and China where Census could not be undertaken. Table 1.2 The table shows State-wise area and population by district-wise of Census, 2001. Table 1.3 This table gives state-wise decennial population enumerated in elevan Censuses from 1901 to 2001. Table 1.4 This table gives state-wise population decennial percentage variations enumerated in ten Censuses from 1901 to 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Census of India 2001
    CENSUS OF INDIA 2001 SERIES-25 GUJARAT DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK Part XII-A & B SURAT DISTRICT PART II VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY -¢-- VILLAGE AND TOWNWISE PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT ~.,~ &~ PEOPLE ORIENTED Jayant Parimal of the Indian Administrative Service Director of Census Operations, Gujarat © Govj!mment of India Copyright Data Product Code 24-034-2001- Census-Book Contents Pages Foreword xi Preface xiii Acknowledgements xv District Highlights -2001 Census xvii Important Statistics in the District xix Ranking of Talukas in the District XXI Statements 1-9 Statement 1: Name of the Headquarters of the DistrictlTaluka, their Rural-Urban status xxiv and distance from District Headquarters, 2001 Statement 2: Name of the Headquarters of the District/TalukalC.D.Block, their Rural- xxiv Urban status and distance from District Headquarters, 2001 Statement 3: Population of the District at each Census from 1901 To 2001 xxv Statement 4: Area, Number of VillagesIT owns and Population in District and Taluka,2001 xxvi Statement 5: Taluka IC.D.Blockwise Number of Villages and Rural Pop)llation, 2001 xxix Statement 6.: Population of Urban Agglomerations I Towns, 2001 xxix Statement 7: Villages with Population of 5,000 and above at Taluka I C.D.Block Level as xxx per 2001 Census and amenities available Statement 8: Statutory Towns with Population less than 5,000 as per 2001 Census and xxxiii amenities available Statement 9: Houseless and Ins~itutional Population of Talukas, Rural and Urban, 2001 XXXlll Analytical Note (i) History and Scope of the DisL ________ s Handbook 3 (ii) Brief History of the District 4 (iii) Administrative Set Up 6 (iv) Physical Features 8 (v) Census Concepts 19 (vi) Non-Census Concepts 25 (vii) 2001 Census Findings - Population, its distribution 30 Brief analysis of PCA data Brief analysis of the Village Directory and Town Directory data Brief analysis of the data on Houses and Household amenities House listing Operations, Census of India 2001 (viii) .
    [Show full text]
  • State Statistical Handbook 2014
    STATISTICAL HANDBOOK WEST BENGAL 2014 Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics Department of Statistics & Programme Implementation Government of West Bengal PREFACE Statistical Handbook, West Bengal provides information on salient features of various socio-economic aspects of the State. The data furnished in its previous issue have been updated to the extent possible so that continuity in the time-series data can be maintained. I would like to thank various State & Central Govt. Departments and organizations for active co-operation received from their end in timely supply of required information. The officers and staff of the Reference Technical Section of the Bureau also deserve my thanks for their sincere effort in bringing out this publication. It is hoped that this issue would be useful to planners, policy makers and researchers. Suggestions for improvements of this publication are most welcome. Tapas Kr. Debnath Joint Administrative Building, Director Salt Lake, Kolkata. Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics 30th December, 2015 Government of West Bengal CONTENTS Table No. Page I. Area and Population 1.0 Administrative Units in West Bengal - 2014 1 1.1 Villages, Towns and Households in West Bengal, Census 2011 2 1.2 Districtwise Population by Sex in West Bengal, Census 2011 3 1.3 Density of Population, Sex Ratio and Percentage Share of Urban Population in West Bengal by District 4 1.4 Population, Literacy rate by Sex and Density, Decennial Growth rate in West Bengal by District (Census 2011) 6 1.5 Number of Workers and Non-workers
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescentsand
    4 INDIA GENDER GAIPNDIA IN L ITERACY RATE AMONGenderG AD OGapLE inSC LiteracyENT P RateOPU LATION (AGamongE GR OAdolescentUP 10-19 Population YEARS) - 2011 (Age Group 10-19 years) - 2011 JAMMU & KASHMIR (STATES/UNION TERRITORIES) 7.4 (States/Union Territories) HIMACHAL PRADESH 0.5 PUNJAB 0.7 CHANDIGARH 0.8 UTTARAKHAND 1.6 HARYANA 3.4 NCT OF DELHI ARUNACHAL 0.5 PRADESH 4.7 SIKKIM 0.5 RAJASTHAN UTTAR PRADESH 10.7 4.5 ASSAM 1.3 NAGALAND 0.7 BIHAR MEGHALAYA 6.5 -2.9 MANIPUR 2.3 TRIPURA GUJARAT JHARKHAND 1.9 MIZORAM 2.2 3.7 MADHYA PRADESH 6.0 WEST BENGAL 3.7 0.8 CHHATTISGARH 3.5 DAMAN & DIU -1.1 ODISHA DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 4.8 6.9 MAHARASHTRA 1.2 Profile of ANDHRA PRADESH P 2.8 GOA Gender Gap in Literacy Rate among 0.6 Adolescent Population KARNATAKA 2.2 (Age Group 10-19) and A Adolescents Negative N D A M L Below 3.0 A A PUDUCHERRY N K 0.1 3.0 - 5.9 A S TAMIL NADU N P D ( H I 0.6 ( N 6.0 - 8.9 I N A 0.1 N D KERALA D I I 0.1 in India A D 0.0 I C ) A Youth 9.0 - 11.9 ) O W B E A R E 12.0 & Above I S P L A P - PUDUCHERRY 5 N D S INDIA INDIA GENDER GAP IN LITERACY RATE State of Literacy among Gender Gap in Literacy Rate AMONG YOUTH POPULATION among Youth Population (AGE GROUP 15-24 YEARS) - 2011 (Age Group 15-24 years) - 2011 JAMMU & KASHMIR (STA(States/UnionTES/UNION Territories) TERRITORIES) 13.3 Adolescent and Youth Population HIMACHAL PRADESH PUNJAB 1.3 1.5 CHANDIGARH 2.1 UTTARAKHAND 4.1 HARYANA 6.3 ARUNACHAL NCT OF DELHI PRADESH 2.3 8.4 SIKKIM RAJASTHAN UTTAR PRADESH 1.6 19.7 10.9 ASSAM 5.6 NAGALAND 1.8 BIHAR MEGHALAYA 15.9 -1.5 MANIPUR 4.8
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Lakshadweep, Part XIII a & B, Series-30
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES - 30 LAKSHADWEEP DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK PARTS XIII - A & B VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY VILLAGE & TOWN WISE PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT LAKSHADWEEP DISTRICT P. M. NAIR OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE D!RECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS, LAKSHADWEEP 10' fl' j ••I POSITION Of lAKSHAOWEEP IN INDIA, 1981 Boundary,lnterliiltl:::n;i1 _'_o_ Boundary, St;ue/Union Terntory Capital of Indl' CapItal of St?tc/Union Territory. • • Jl' Kd(')metrcs 100 200 100 400 2" 2; BAY o F BENGAL ARABIAN It S 12 A The administrative heldquill8rs of Chandlgarh. Haryana and Punjab are at Chand,garh G. O•• o. GOA, DIIM",N • DIU PON(JICHERAY ; N D 1 A -~; 0 C E A N N ~!~~A: I ! 72· Euc 0' Greenwlth ,0' ,.. ,,' lue" upo" Surit)' of '"dl, map with tht permlmon 01 tht 5",.....yor G,nerll 01 India Th, bO.,l'.Glry of Htlhalaya '''own on thh ma, II at IIUtrprtt.cl from the Hon"'Euurn Ar ... (~Dor,anlucIO') Ace. It71, but tin yet to tt ..... r!f1.d l~. te'rltor,.1 ""attn .,f Indl. II'Xltnd 'I'ItO tM It. to I cllJtll'lce 0' twl'''' rtlutlc.l_lI .. _ro .rom th ••pproprllte b .... lin .. CONTENTS Page FOREWORD v PREFACE vii IMPORTANT STATISTICS Xl ANALYTICAL NOTE 1-47 The 1981 Census 1 Concepts of 1981 Census I Geological forma tion of the Islands 3 Brief history of the district 3 History of District Census Handbook 4 Present Administra live set up 4 Scope of VilLlge Directory. Town Directory and Primary Census Abstract 5 Climate 5 General Fauna and Flora 6 Social and cultural characteris tics 6 Major economic characteristics and development activities 9
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia
    Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability Peter Ellis and Mark Roberts © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 18 17 16 15 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The fi ndings, interpre- tations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily refl ect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifi cally reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Ellis, Peter, and Mark Roberts. 2016. Leveraging Urban- ization in South Asia: Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Towns Sagepub.In/Home.Nav DOI: 10.1177/0975425315583755
    Article Environment and Urbanization ASIA New Patterns in Indian 6(1) 18–27 © 2015 National Institute Urbanization: Emergence of Urban Affairs (NIUA) SAGE Publications of Census Towns sagepub.in/home.nav DOI: 10.1177/0975425315583755 http://eua.sagepub.com Arup Mitra1 Rajnish Kumar2 Abstract This study focuses on the new patterns related to urbanization in India from the 2011 census data, particularly with regard to the emergence of the census towns. What forces are involved in explaining the growth of such towns is an important question and this is what the present article tries to explore. The regional spread of these census towns is examined and based on the district-level data, the growth dynamics of such reclassification of areas from rural to urban status is brought out through factor analysis. Further, the viability of such new towns to sustain economic activities and population growth is also discussed. Findings tend to suggest that activities in areas which have already been urban tend to spillover to the rural hinterland and then usher in a change in their classification status, in a limited sense though. On the other hand, the shift of labour to non-farm activities due to the lack of productive sources of livelihood in the agricultural sector is also a strong possibility. Finally, the policy implications are brought out. 印度城镇化的新模式：普查城镇的兴起 本研究根据2011年人口普查数据，着重关注印度城镇化有关的新模式，特别是与普查城镇兴起 相关的内容。什么力量导致了这类城镇的兴起，是一个重要的问题，这也是本文试图去阐释 的。这类普查城镇在区域的分布是基于区域层级的数据来检验的。区域内从农村到城市的再分 类的不断变化的情况是通过因子分析来获得的。此外，文中也讨论了这种新城镇保持经济活动 和人口增长的能力。研究结论显示已经城市化地区的活动往往会波及农村腹地，然后迎来它们 的分类状况的变化，即使是在有限的程度上。另一方面，由于缺乏在农业领域赖以生存的生产 资源，劳动力向非农活动转变也是一个很强的可能性。最后，文章总结了政策的影响。 Keywords Urbanisation, census towns, statutory towns, agglomeration economies, growth, poverty 1 Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi University, Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities, Skills, and Sectors in Developing Economies∗
    Cities, Skills, and Sectors in Developing Economies∗ Donald R. Davisy Jonathan I. Dingelz Antonio Misciox Columbia and NBER Chicago Booth and NBER BCG December 31, 2016 PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE Abstract In developed economies, larger cities are skill-abundant and specialize in skill- intensive activities. This paper characterizes the spatial distributions of skills and sectors in Brazil, China, and India. To facilitate comparisons with developed-economy findings, we construct metropolitan areas from finer geographic units for each economy. We then compare and contrast the spatial distributions of educational attainment, in- dustrial employment, and occupational employment across Brazil, China, India, and the United States. ∗We thank Luis Costa, Kevin Dano, Shirley Yarin, and Yue Yuan for excellent research assistance. Dingel thanks the Kathryn and Grant Swick Faculty Research Fund at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business for supporting this work. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 1 Introduction This paper studies the distribution of skills across cities of different sizes in three large developing economies: Brazil, China, and India. These three countries jointly account for approximately 40 percent of world population and are diverse in their levels of income. The process of urbanization in developing economies is important due to both the number of people involved and the opportunity to shape outcomes. The World Bank projects that 2.7 billion additional people will live in developing economies' cities by 2050. While urbanization does not imply growth, the two are nonetheless strongly linked (Henderson, 2014). In developed economies, larger cities are skill-abundant and specialize in skill-intensive activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuances of Census Towns in India: Praxis, Trends and Spatial Patterns of Non-Statutory Urbanisation
    Trans.Inst.Indian Geographers ISSN 0970-9851 Nuances of census towns in India: praxis, trends and spatial patterns of non-statutory urbanisation Anupreet Singh Tiwana, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab Abstract Census towns account for nearly half of all urban centres in India. Census towns are large villages that met the census standards for an urban area, but that has not been regarded as urban by the government. Census towns are mostly the outcome of the local populace forcing alteration in hierarchies of the contemporary urban revolution. The present paper is an endeavour to study the puzzle of recent mushrooming of non-statutory towns in India as urbanisation dynamics diverging from metro-centricity to non-statutory settlements. Unprecedented spurt in the number of census towns perhaps reveals a tendency towards what may be termed as subaltern urbanisation in India. This tendency also points towards the trajectory at which the workforce is shifting away from the agriculture sector. Policy intervention is the need of the hour for sustainable urban development. Keywords: Urban revolution, census towns, non-statutory urbanisation, subaltern urbanisation. Introduction 1998). In the post-economic reforms period, India is becoming an exciting research area accelerated transnational capital investment for scholars interested in urban studies and trade are disrupting traditional patterns as one out of the ten urban citizens of of urban growth, and as a result, newer and the world is from India, and urbanisation smaller cities have been growing at the dynamics here seem to diverge from expense of older and larger ones, upsetting metro-centricity to small urban settlements urban hierarchies in many countries of and non-statutory settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding India's Urban Frontier
    WPS7923 Policy Research Working Paper 7923 Public Disclosure Authorized Understanding India’s Urban Frontier What Is behind the Emergence of Census Towns Public Disclosure Authorized in India? Partha Mukhopadhyay Marie-Hélène Zérah Gopa Samanta Augustin Maria Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice Group December 2016 Policy Research Working Paper 7923 Abstract This paper presents the results of an investigation of selected studies of representative census towns in Bihar, Jharkhand, census towns in northern India. Census towns are settle- Orissa, and West Bengal show the role of increased con- ments that India’s census classifies as urban although they nectivity and growing rural incomes in driving the demand continue to be governed as rural settlements. The 2011 for the small-scale and non-tradable services, which are census featured a remarkable increase in the number of the main sources of nonfarm employment in these set- census towns, which nearly tripled between 2001 and 2011, tlements. The case studies also reveal that the trade-offs from 1,362 to 3,894. This increase contributed to nearly a between urban and rural administrative statuses are actively third (29.5 percent) of the total increase in the urban pop- debated in many of these settlements. Although statistical ulation during this period. Only part of this evolution can comparisons do not show a significant impact of urban or be attributed to the gradual urbanization of settlements in rural administrative status on access to basic services, urban the vicinity or larger towns. Instead, the majority of census status is often favored by the social groups involved in the towns appear as small “market towns,” providing trade and growing commercial and services sectors, and resisted by other local services to a growing rural market.
    [Show full text]
  • Officiating Urbanisation What Makes a Settlement Officially Urban in India?
    Officiating Urbanisation What makes a settlement officially urban in India? Bhanu Joshi, Kanhu Charan Pradhan January 2018 WORKING PAPER WWW.CPRINDIA.ORG ABSTRACT Financial incentives including government support grants for infrastructure creation, health and education development in many countries is contingent on where people live. In India, the allocation of critical government subsidies explicitly recognises urban population as a criterion for budgetary allocation. Yet, the fundamental question about what is an urban area and what does it entail to be recognised as an urban settlement in India remains understudied. This paper aims to understand the definitional paradigm of statutory towns in India. We create a novel dataset of all state laws in India on the constitution of urban local governments. We analyse the eligibility criteria that would qualify any area to become urban local bodies under the law in different states and find large variation among states. In our dataset, only fifteen of the twenty-seven states explicitly define and have laws on urban settlements. Within these fifteen states, we find that many small and transitional urban areas violate the eligibility criteria laid down by the state laws constituting them. We further find that states which do not provide statutory laws rely on executive fiat, i.e. it is the prerogative of the state government to declare the creation of a statutory town. What then becomes or “unbecomes” urban in these states is open to dispute. The full extent of this variation and reasons thereof can open up new avenues of scholarship. WORKING PAPER OFFICIATING URBANISATION: WHAT MAKES A SETTLEMENT OFFICIALLY URBAN IN INDIA? Introduction In 2011, 31 per cent of India’s total population lived in urban areas (Registrar General of India 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Level of Urbanization and Consistency Measurement in South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India
    AEGAEUM JOURNAL ISSN NO: 0776-3808 LEVEL OF URBANIZATION AND CONSISTENCY MEASUREMENT IN SOUTH 24 PARGANAS, WEST BENGAL, INDIA Pompa Moadal1 & Dr. Tapas Mistri2 1Research Scholar of The University of Burdwan, West Bengal. 2Assistant Professor in Geography, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal. (Corresponding Author) Email: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Urbanization is the process of concentration of people in densely populated settlements where major portion derive their livelihood from other than primary occupation. It indicates the increase of the number of people living in urban areas mainly due to the natural growth, rural to urban migration, reclassification. Urbanization also reflects the level of development of any unit. To formulate the plan and policies of the development and to overcome the urban problems of any area it is necessary to know the nature and level of urbanization of this unit. Present study is concerned with the level of urbanization based on four selected urbanity and socio-economic indicators and consistency measurement in S. 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. Hence, different statistical, cartographic and GIS methods have been used to fulfil the aim and objectives. This study reveals that the study area is a highly urbanised district both in terms of growth of urban population and urban centres but in sense of share of urban population it stands much bellow the state average. It also reveals that there is huge intra spatial disparity in the level of urbanization and the consistency of the urbanization in the study area. Keywords: urbanization; level of urbanization; spatial disparity; consistency; GIS. Introduction: Urbanization is the proportion of urban population to the total population of any area.
    [Show full text]