DOCSLIB.ORG

Preserving Our Lifeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Preserving Our Lifeline working together to nurture, renew and protect the waters of the bow river basin Follow us @BowRiverWPAC facebook.com/BowRiverBasinCouncil www.brbc.ab.ca Volume 20 | Issue 3 September 2020 Calgary River Valleys: Riparian Restoration and Education Anne Naumann, Project Manager Calgary River Valleys [email protected] Calgary River Valleys (CRV) an annual Brown Trout Redd Count An important aspect of this project each November to count and includes educational outreach to is a non-profit organization geo-locate the spawning nests of other river-adjacent homeowners, that has operated in Brown Trout in the Elbow River. river community associations, and Calgary since 1991. This data is one indicator of river the larger Calgary citizenship. We ecosystem health and collecting it have conducted surveys on people’s consistently each year allows analysis riparian knowledge, hosted site tours of spawning trends over time. We after each “riverbank makeover,” and In addition to annual field work provide the data collected to several provided educational information projects, CRV works toward ensuring levels of government and like- to the public via ongoing articles that the cumulative effects of urban minded organizations. In 2019, the in community newsletters across development and recreational Government of Alberta used CRV’s Calgary. activities are anticipated and planned data to help determine suitable sites so as to protect, and where possible, for the Elbow River Spawning Habitat Continued on page 2 restore natural processes and habitats. Restoration Pilot Project. CRV is unique in Calgary in that we are the only organization that tracks In 2018 and 2019, CRV completed IN THIS large-scale land use and development two phases of a riparian restoration proposals that impact Calgary’s project: “The Elbow River Riverbank Issue watercourses and wetlands, so as to Makeover Project.” This project was 1 Calgary River Valleys provide independent input regarding completed with funding from the how best to protect our water assets. City of Calgary and other sources, as 4 Waiparous Creek Water We consider our organization “the a demonstration project to show the Quality voice of our rivers.” kinds of techniques that can be used 6 Western Sky Land Trust by river-adjacent homeowners to 8 Tribute to Gus Yaki CRV also encourages the replant their riparian zone and provide 8 BRBC Annual General Meeting participation of volunteers in our flood and drought mitigation, as well and Phosphorus Management field work projects. We organize as improve river water quality and Plan Update wildlife habitat. Page 2 Continued from page 1 In early 2020, CRV received funding We found from our research in other communities via community under the Government of Alberta’s 2018 and 2019 that many river- newsletters, as well as to multiple Watershed Resiliency and Restoration adjacent homeowners in Calgary are media and social media sources, Program (WRRP) for riparian still traumatized by the effects and including Global News TV and their restoration and educational work to catastrophic damage from both the website, and MyCalgary.com. be conducted until early 2022. While 2005 and 2013 floods and they are the start of our project was delayed motivated to do what they can to help Starting this year, we plan to by the onset of Covid-19, we are now mitigate the effects of the next flood build on these efforts to provide preparing to follow hygiene and in Calgary. Unfortunately, we also educational information to river- physical distancing best practices found that some homeowners believe adjacent landowners and the broader for all three main components of the best solution for flood protection citizenry via media, social media and the project: research, education and is to install a retaining wall or large our website. The new information will outreach, and riparian restoration field boulders as was done shortly after include advice about the benefits of work. Below is an outline of what our the flood in many publicly owned re-planting riparian zones with native project will entail. areas. However, science shows that riparian adapted species: while rocks and retaining walls may • To stabilize the riverbank, help to prevent erosion in one area, Research thereby limiting erosion during they just rebound the river’s energy flood events, both at the site and so areas further downstream can be downstream; The research component will eroded or otherwise more negatively build on the work we completed in affected during flood events. A • To absorb water during high 2018 and 2019 in partnership with bio-engineering solution, where the water events (flooding) and the City of Calgary. We can now riparian zone is planted with a variety release water during drought broaden our survey research of river of sedges, rushes, shrubs and trees, events; adjacent landowners and the larger can still achieve the desired goal of • To reduce river energy and population of Calgary regarding their erosion protection while allowing the resulting water damage during understanding of the functions and riparian zone to function normally and flood events; benefits of a healthy riparian zone for maintain wildlife habitat. • To filter contaminants due to flood and drought mitigation, river land run-off, thereby improving water quality and wildlife habitat. river water quality; In the last two years we initiated In response to the educational • To trap sediments and improve direct door-to-door engagement messaging that we deliver over the water quality ; and with every homeowner whose course of our project, we plan to property is adjacent to the Elbow track changes in people’s levels of • To create habitat for wildlife, River, as well as face-to-face surveys knowledge of riparian functions and including shade for fish. of citizens attending the Fish Creek the roles riparian zones play in flood and drought mitigation, as well as Park Creekfest event. The surveys We also intend to continue our improving river water quality. measure respondents’ knowledge and efforts to provide educational understanding of riparian zones, and information to those involved in the help to support the environmental Education & Outreach City’s planning and development stewardship of these areas. For process so as to encourage protection, this WRRP-funded project, we plan With WRRP grant funding, we intend wherever possible, of Calgary’s river to complete additional surveys of to build on our successful education valleys, creeks, riparian areas and landowners along rivers and creeks and outreach efforts in 2018 and 2019 wetlands. in Calgary, as well as continue to regarding the Elbow River Riverbank gather data from the broader Calgary Makeover projects. Information population regarding their knowledge about our project was delivered of the importance of maintaining and directly to hundreds of thousands restoring riparian zones to their full of Calgarians in river-adjacent and Continued on page 3 functionality. Page 3 Continued from page 2 Riparian Restoration Field Work native adapted vegetation species. We benefit from restoration of the expect to complete a re-planting for at riparian zone, and will also require the For the final component of this least one site in 2020 and at least one landowner to allow the restoration WRRP-funded project, we intend to additional site in 2021. Pictures of the and follow-up monitoring for at least identify, assess and restore to higher restoration site from 2018 and 2019 two years . functionality at least two damaged are below. riparian areas within Calgary. We plan We hope to provide an update after to remove non-native and invasive The sites for our 2020-2021 project year one of our newest project. vegetation species from selected are still to be confirmed. In order to be riparian zones, and re-plant them with selected, each site must significantly CRV 2018 restoration site in June 2020 along the Elbow River in Calgary. Four CRV 2019 restoration site in June 2020 along the Elbow River in Calgary. A planting beds were created by removing Kentucky bluegrass to allow space variety of riparian plants were planted in multiple locations on this site to help to plant a variety of water-loving trees and shrubs to reduce bank erosion reduce bank erosion, improve water quality, and provide additional habitat for and improve water quality, and allow for various wildflowers and herbs for wildlife. On the upstream property border and near the river’s edge, groupings aesthetics. Riparian plantings included river birch, Saskatoons, gooseberries, of sandbar willow stakes were planted at an angle to work with the river flow wild rose, red osier dogwood, yellow willow, shining willow, and an entire during high water events. upstream bed of sandbar willow. All photos: Calgary River Valleys. CRV 2019 restoration site in June 2020 along the Elbow River in Calgary. Wild CRV 2019 restoration site in June 2020 along the Elbow River in Calgary. rose and Saskatoon bushes were planted near an existing stand of red osier Gooseberry bushes and butterfly-friendly wildflowers were planted near an dogwood shrubs. existing patio seating area on the property, several metres back from the river’s edge. Page 4 Page 4 Determination of Fecal Coliform Sources and Surface Water Quality in Waiparous Creek Within the Ghost River Watershed Emily Moore, Anna Zacaruk, Maria Arizaleta, Brandee Lynch, Charlotte Ansell University of Calgary [email protected] [email protected] As part of a self-directed group study conducted through an environmental science course at the University of Calgary, we were asked to identify an addressable concern in the Ghost Watershed relating to surface water quality. After discussion with members of the Ghost Watershed Alliance Society, 18 sample sites. Figure: ALCES and Ghost Watershed Alliance Society, Ghost River State of the Watershed a local Watershed Stewardship Group, Report 2018, Figure 49.
Recommended publications
  • Water Quality Study of Waiparous Creek, Fallentimber Creek and Ghost River

    Water Quality Study of Waiparous Creek, Fallentimber Creek and Ghost River

    Water Quality Study of Waiparous Creek, Fallentimber Creek and Ghost River Final Report Prepared by: Daniel Andrews Ph.D. Clearwater Environmental Consultants Inc. Prepared for: Alberta Environment Project 2005-76 February, 2006 Pub No. T/853 ISBN: 0-7785-4574-1 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-4575-X (On-Line Edition) Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Environmental Management Southern Region Alberta Environment 3rd Floor, Deerfoot Square 2938 – 11th Street, N.E. Calgary, Alberta T3E 7L7 Phone: (403) 297-5921 Fax: (403) 297-6069 Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Information Centre Alberta Environment Main Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: (780) 427-2700 Fax: (780) 422-4086 Email: [email protected] ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Increased usage of the Ghost -Waiparous basin for random camping and off-highway vehicles (OHVs) has raised concerns among stakeholders that these activities are affecting water quality in the Ghost, Waiparous and Fallentimber Rivers. This report to Alberta Environment attempts to determine whether there is a linkage between these activities and water quality in these three rivers and documents baseline water quality prior to the implementation of an access management plan by the Alberta Government. Water quality monitoring of these rivers was conducted by Alberta Environment during 2004 and 2005. Continuous measurements of turbidity (as a surrogate for total suspended solids), pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and temperature were taken in Waiparous Creek, upstream at the Black Rock Trail and downstream at the Department of National Defense base from early May to late July, 2004.
  • Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O

    Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O

    30% SW-COC-002397 Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O. Box 2100 Station M Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 Street Address: 625 - 25th Ave S.E. Bow River Basin Council Mark Bennett, B.Sc., MPA Executive Director tel: 403.268.4596 fax: 403.254.6931 email: [email protected] Mike Murray, B.Sc. Program Manager tel: 403.268.4597 fax: 403.268.6931 email: [email protected] www.brbc.ab.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 Overview 4 Basin History 6 What is a Watershed? 7 Flora and Fauna 10 State of the Watershed OUR SUB-BASINS 12 Upper Bow River 14 Kananaskis River 16 Ghost River 18 Seebe to Bearspaw 20 Jumpingpound Creek 22 Bearspaw to WID 24 Elbow River 26 Nose Creek 28 WID to Highwood 30 Fish Creek 32 Highwood to Carseland 34 Highwood River 36 Sheep River 38 Carseland to Bassano 40 Bassano to Oldman River CONCLUSION 42 Summary 44 Acknowledgements 1 Overview WELCOME! This State of the Watershed: Summary Booklet OVERVIEW OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK... THE WATER TOWERS was created by the Bow River Basin Council as a companion to The mountainous headwaters of the Bow our new Web-based State of the Watershed (WSOW) tool. This Comprising about 25,000 square kilometres, the Bow River basin The Bow River is approximately 645 kilometres in length. It begins at Bow Lake, at an River basin are often described as the booklet and the WSOW tool is intended to help water managers covers more than 4% of Alberta, and about 23% of the South elevation of 1,920 metres above sea level, then drops 1,180 metres before joining with the water towers of the watershed.
  • The 2013 Flood Event in the Bow and Oldman River Basins; Causes, Assessment, and Damages

    The 2013 Flood Event in the Bow and Oldman River Basins; Causes, Assessment, and Damages

    The 2013 flood event in the Bow and Oldman River basins; causes, assessment, and damages John Pomeroy1, Ronald E. Stewart2, and Paul H. Whitfield1,3,4 1Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C8. Phone: (306) 966-1426, Email: [email protected] 2Department of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2 3Department of Earth Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6 4Environment Canada, Vancouver, BC, V6C 3S5 Event summary In late June 2013, heavy rainfall and rapidly melting alpine snow triggered flooding throughout much of the southern half of Alberta. Heavy rainfall commenced on June 19th and continued for three days. When the event was over, more than 200 mm and as much as 350 mm of precipitation fell over the Front Ranges of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Tributaries to the Bow River including the Ghost, Kananaskis, Elbow, Sheep, Highwood, and many of their tributaries all reached flood levels. The storm had a large spatial extent causing flooding to the north and south in the Red Deer and Oldman Basins, and also to the west in the Elk River in British Columbia. Convergence of the nearly synchronous floodwaters downstream in the Saskatchewan River system caused record high releases from Lake Diefenbaker through Gardiner Dam. Dam releases in Alberta and Saskatchewan attenuated the downstream flood peak such that only moderate flooding occurred in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. More than a dozen municipalities declared local states of emergency; numerous communities were placed under evacuation order in Alberta and Saskatchewan. More than 100,000 people needed to evacuate their homes, and five people died.
  • JOURNAL of ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORY Issue

    JOURNAL of ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORY Issue

    JOURNAL OF ALBERTA POSTAL HISTORY Issue #22 Edited by Dale Speirs, Box 6830, Calgary, Alberta T2P 2E7, or [email protected] Published in February 2020. POSTAL HISTORY OF RED DEER RIVER BADLANDS: PART 2 by Dale Speirs This issue deals with the northern section of the Red Deer River badlands of south-central Alberta from Kneehill canyon to Rosedale. The badlands portion of the river stretches for 200 kilometres, gouged out by glacial meltwaters. The badlands are the richest source of Late Cretaceous dinosaurs in the world. Originally settled by homesteaders, the coal industry dominated from the 1920s to its death in the 1950s. Since then, the tourist industry has grown, with petroleum and agriculture strong. 2 Part 1 appeared in JAPH #13. Index To Post Offices. Aerial 44 Beynon 30 Cambria 47 Carbon 56 Drumheller 7 Fox Coulee 20 Gatine 51 Grainger 60 Hesketh 53 Midlandvale 13 Nacmine 17 Newcastle Mine 16 Rosebud Creek/Rosebud 33 Rosedale 40 Rosedale Station 40 Wayne 26 3 DRUMHELLER MUNICIPALITY The economic centre of the Red Deer River badlands is Drumheller, with a population of about 8,100 circa 2016. Below is a modern map of the area, showing Drumheller’s central position in the badlands. It began in 1911 as a coal mining village and grew rapidly during the heyday of coal. After World War Two, when railroads converted to diesel and buildings were heated with natural gas, Drumheller went into a decades-long decline. The economic slump was finally reversed by the construction of the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, the world’s largest fossil museum and a major international tourist destination.
  • Guide to Documents Relating to American Indians in Montana

    Guide to Documents Relating to American Indians in Montana

    Guide to Documents Relating to American Indians in Montana Identified and Collected by the Natives of Montana Archival Project (NOMAP) From Repositories in the National Archives and Records Administration, Smithsonian Institution & Library of Congress 2008-10 Helen Cryer (Saddle Lake Cree, ’08) Miranda McCarvel (’08-10) Carole Meyers (Oneida/Seneca/Blackfeet) (’10) Wilena Old Person (Blackfeet/Yakama, ’08-09) Glen Still Smoking Jr. (Blackfeet, ’08) Eli Suzukovich III (Cree, ’08) Richmond Clow (’10) David Beck, faculty advisor to project Steve McCann, Digital Projects Librarian Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………..... 2 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington D.C. …........ 3 Record Group 75 Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) .... 3 Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General’s Office ……… 5 Record Group 217 Records of the Accounting Officers of the. Department of Treasury …………………………………...... 7 Record Group 393, Records of the U.S. Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920 ……………………………………... 7 National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland 8 Smithsonian Institution, National Anthropological Archives …………..... 9 NAA Manuscripts …………………………………………………. 9 NAA Audiotapes, Drawings, Films, Photographs and Prints ……... 20 Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of the American Indian Archives …………………………………………………….. 23 Library of Congress ……………………………………………………….. 26 Appendix 1: Key Word Index ...…………………………………………… 27 Appendix 2: Record Group 75 Entry 91 Letters Received Index …………. 41 1 Introduction This is a guide to primary source documents relating to Indians in Montana that are located in Washington D.C. These documents have been identified and in some cases digitized by teams of University of Montana students sponsored by the American Indian Programs of the National Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution and the UM Mansfield Library.
  • Badlands Motorsports Resort

    Badlands Motorsports Resort

    Badlands June Motorsports Resort 2013 [An innovative recreational resort for motorsport enthusiasts and Area families. Badlands Motorsports Resort proposes a self sustaining community that prides itself on creating a strong sense of belonging Structure within and around the resort and seamless integration of programs into the inherently surreal environment. ] Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................6 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………….…………7 1.2 AREA STRUCTURE PLAN OBJECTIVES…………………………………………….................…………9 1.3 PLAN PREPARATION……………………………………..........…………………................………………9 1.4 PLAN INTERPRETATION……………………………………………………………...............……………….9 2 SITE ANALYSIS...........................................................................................................................10 2.1 LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE.......................................................................................10 2.2 GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS AND VEGETATION.....................................................11 2.2.1 Geology……………………………................................………………..………....…………11 2.2.2 Geomorphology.……………………………………………………………........…………………11 2.2.3 Hydrology…………………………………………………………………………….....………………11 2.2.4 Soils…….…………………………………………………………………………………….....…………14 2.2.5 Vegetation…….................………………………………………………………………......……14 2.3 WILDLIFE.....................................................................................................................17
  • Agricultural Service Board Agenda

    Agricultural Service Board Agenda

    AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD AGENDA The Agricultural Service Board will hold a meeting on Monday, September 18, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., in Council Chambers, 1408 Twp Rd. 320, Didsbury, AB 1. AGENDA 1.1 Adoption of Agenda 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 2.1 Agricultural Service Board Meeting Minutes of August 21, 2017 3. BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF THE MINUTES 4. DELEGATION 4.1 9:00 a.m. Christine Campbell, ALUS Canada, Western Hub Manager (conference call - ALUS Update and Old Business 5.2) 4.2 9:30 a.m. Ryan Morrison, Assistant Directory of Operational Services Mountain View County (New Business 6.4) 4.3 10:00 a.m. Tammy Schwass, Alberta Plastics Recycling Association, Executive Director, Pat Sliworsky, CAO, Mountain View Regional Waste Management Commission & Patricia McKean, Mountain View County Division 2 / Vice Chair, Commission Board of Directors (Old Business 5.3) 4.4 11:00 a.m. Grant Lastiwka, Livestock / Forage Business Specialist for Alberta Agriculture and Forestry 5. OLD BUSINESS 5.1 Riparian and Ecological Enhancement Program Projects 5.2 Alternative Land Use Services (ALUS) Projects 5.3 Farm Plastic Round-Up Program Review 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.1 2018 ASB Projects Budget 6.2 Living in the Natural Environment Support 6.3 Wild Boar Agreement 6.4 Second Cut of Gravel Roads East of Highway 2 Discussion (verbal report) 7. INFORMATION ITEMS 7.1 a. Seed Plant Updates (verbal report) b. Upcoming Workshops - Mountain View County Events Webpage Link c. Aspen Ranch Farm Safety, Agricultural & Environmental Awareness (verbal report) d. On Farm Water Testing Request Form 7.2 Expense Form 8.
  • South Saskatchewan River Natural Flow and Apportionment: Irrigation Return Flows 2001-2005 Phase 1

    South Saskatchewan River Natural Flow and Apportionment: Irrigation Return Flows 2001-2005 Phase 1

    South Saskatchewan River Natural Flow and Apportionment: Irrigation Return Flows 2001-2005 Phase 1 Prepared by: Greg MacCulloch, P.Eng. and Barkat Khan, M.Sc. Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Water Survey Division Calgary, Alberta Prepared For: Prairie Provinces Water Board Recommended By: Committee on Hydrology Approved By: Prairie Provinces Water Board Meeting No. 97 PPWB REPORT NO. 170 March 2011 Executive Summary This report produced on behalf of the Prairie Provinces Water Board (PPWB) Committee on Hydrology (COH) reviews the impact of irrigation return flow in the natural flow determinations for the South Saskatchewan River Basin. The report looks in detail at the return flow data obtained from the 13 irrigation districts of southern Alberta as compiled by Alberta Agriculture and from the Water Survey Canada (WSC) with respect to the adequacy of the data in terms of its accuracy and timeliness. Volumetric flow rates in irrigation return flow channels during the April to October irrigation season were reviewed on an annual basis to compare the difference of utilizing data from all return flow sites to the present approach of using a subset of some of the return flow sites. Results of the analysis of the PPWB return flow sites did not demonstrate any inconsistency in flow in the recent years; however, some individual sites show trends toward increased or decreased return flow which may be due in part to changes in local irrigation practice. Averaging values from 1994 to 2005 demonstrates that return flow from all the sources comprises approximately 5 percent of the South Saskatchewan River natural flow to the Alberta/Saskatchewan boundary.
  • Bow Basin Flood Mitigation and Watershed Management Project

    Bow Basin Flood Mitigation and Watershed Management Project

    Bow Basin Flood Mitigation and Watershed Management Project March 31, 2014 Disclaimer AI-EES and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor that use thereof infringe on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AI-EES or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of AI-EES and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents. Further, the list of individuals and the organization they represented, which appears in Appendix A, reflects those who participated in some or all of the working group meetings for this project. Their inclusion on this list does not suggest advocacy for any particular strategy discussed, but rather provides a sense to the reader of the range of perspectives involved in the working group discussions. Bow Basin Flood Mitigation and Watershed Management Project Contents ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND DEFINITIONS ......................................................................... II 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................
  • Gros Ventre/White Clay Place Names

    Gros Ventre/White Clay Place Names

    1 Gros Ventre/White Clay Place Names Second Edition, 2013 Compiled by Allan Taylor, Terry Brockie, and Andrew Cowell, with assistance from John Stiff Arm Copyright: Center for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the West (CSILW), University of Colorado, Boulder CO, 2013. Note: Permission is hereby granted by CSILW to all Gros Ventre individuals and institutions to make copies of this work as needed for educational purposes and personal use, as well as to institutions supporting the Gros Ventre language, for the same purposes. All other copying is restricted by copyright laws. 2 Introduction: This is a list of Gros Ventre/White Clay/A’ani place names. Specifically, it includes all names in the Gros Ventre language that we have been able to find. The places are listed in alphabetical order by their English name, and then the Gros Ventre name(s) are given, in italics. After the italic entries, the Gros Ventre names are separated into segments to show the meanings of the different parts of the word. The linguistic abbreviations used are explained at the end of this publication. There are also references to the sources where the original name was documented in many cases. The list of these sources is also at the end of the paper. The majority of these names were documented by Allan Taylor, professor of Linguistics, University of Colorado, during his work with the Gros Ventre Tribe from the 1960s through the 1990s (abbreviation of the form T II.164 refer to Taylor’s Dictionary, Volume II, page 164). Terry Brockie and Andrew Cowell (also a professor at the University of Colorado) worked to find other names no longer known by the Gros Ventre people, but which were recorded by people such as Fred Gone (who gathered the story of the “Seven Visions of Bull Lodge”) and George Bird Grinnell, an early naturalist who lived in the late 1800s and early 1900s and worked with several Plains Indian tribes.
  • Biodiversity Considerations Badlands Motorsports Resort Area Structure Plan, Nov, 2013

    Biodiversity Considerations Badlands Motorsports Resort Area Structure Plan, Nov, 2013

    BADLANDS MOTORSPORTS RESORTS AREA STRUCTURE PLAN KNEEHILL COUNTY BIODIVERSITY CONSIDERATIONS EVIDENCE OF CLIFF WALLIS P. BIOL. November 2013 Cottonwood Consultants Ltd. 615 Deercroft Way SE Calgary, AB T2J 5V4 Telephone: (403) 271-1408 email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Badlands Motorsports Resort development has the potential to place a significant effect on the biodiversity of an environmentally significant area. In addition to the direct on-site impacts from development of native habitats, including rare rough fescue grassland, there could be indirect effects from use related to accessing the site and impacts on species of concern. According to Kneehill County policies, any process involving redesignation for such an environmentally significant area should undergo an environmental impact assessment. This was not done and represents a major deficiency. In my opinion, the proposed Badlands Motorsports Resort Area Structure Plan is not consistent with the Kneehill County Municipal Development Plan, specifically as it relates to guidance and policies dealing with Environmentally Significant Areas and valleys. In addition, the Badlands Motorsports Resort Area Structure Plan is not consistent with the Government of Alberta Land Use Policies as they relate to environmental protection since the Area Structure Plan promotes the loss of significant wildlife and plant habitat and establishes inappropriate land use. Cottonwood Consultants Ltd. BADLANDS MOTORSPORTS RESORT AREA STRUCTURE PLAN 1 1. INTRODUCTION Cottonwood Consultants Ltd. was retained by local landowners to provide an assessment of some biodiversity concerns related to a proposed development in southern Alberta in Kneehill County. The Area Structure Plan (Badlands Motorsports Resorts 2013) involves the proposed development of a "Badlands Motorsports Resort" facility that will be located in the Northern Fescue Grassland Natural Subregion.
  • Rosebud River, Serviceberry Creek and Crowfoot Creek (RSC) Watershed Land System – Census of Agriculture Database Project Report

    Rosebud River, Serviceberry Creek and Crowfoot Creek (RSC) Watershed Land System – Census of Agriculture Database Project Report

    Rosebud River, Serviceberry Creek and Crowfoot Creek (RSC) Watershed Land System – Census of Agriculture Database Project Report Prepared by Donna Beever & Leon Marciak For Rosebud River, Serviceberry Creek and Crowfoot Creek Project Technical and Local Advisory Committees June, 2000 Acknowledgements This is a joint project of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (AAFC - PFRA); Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development (AAFRD); and Ducks Unlimited (DU) Canada. The Project Technical Committee oversaw the technical aspects of this project. Members of this committee are: Leon Marciak and David Spiess (Conservation and Development Branch, AAFRD); Gary Larsen and Les Wetter (DU); Alan Stewart, Dave Gibbens, Paula Brand, and Jacky Lau (AAFC – PFRA); and Jim Hiley and Tony Brierley (AAFC, Research Branch). The Project Local Advisory Committee is the working group that guided the direction and content of the project. This committee is made up of the following local people: Jerry Brunen (DU); Jim Laslo (County of Wheatland); Phil Boehme (Crowfoot Creek Watershed Group); Fiona Briody, Kim Hodge and Sonia Salyzyn (AAFC – PFRA); Patsy Cross (Madawaska Consulting); Leon Marciak (AAFRD); and Donna Beever (project coordination consultant). The National Soil and Water Conservation Program (NSWCP) administered by the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration provided funding for the project and report. The Conservation and Development Branch of Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development provided support for publication of the report, as well as in-kind assistance. Managing and ordering of the Census of Agriculture data were completed by the Branch. A special thank you to Brian Sawyer and David Spiess who prepared numerous watershed and terrain maps to assist with graphic representation of the watershed.