DOCSLIB.ORG

Riscape Report Digi 19122019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Riscape Report Digi 19122019 INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE 2019 A European Perspective Report composition The full report is available at https://riscape.eu/riscape-report/ The printed version only contains the Main Report Main report (Introduction, Scope and Methods, Domain analyses, Conclusions, Appendix 1: Acknowledgments) Created by RISCAPE consortium, Edited by Ari Asmi and Jostein Sundet Appendices Appendix 2 RISCAPE Questionnaire Appendix 3 Environmental RI listing Appendix 4 Bio-medical RI listing & additional information Appendix 5 Physics RI listing Appendix 6 Energy RI listing Appendix 7 Astronomy and Astro-particle RI listing Appendix 8 Social sciences initiatives listing Appendix 9 CH, DH and Languages major research centres listing Appendix 10 e-infrastructure RI and initiative listing Interview data As the detailed interview response information also includes personal information (names, positions) of the RI operators responding to the questionnaire and interviews, the interview data is available only on request. Detailed requests for this material can be directed to [email protected] This report is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 730974 The data moderator is Ari Asmi (University of Helsinki). ISBN 978-951-51-5696-9 (nid.) Commentaries, corrections or questions ISBN 978-951-51-5697-6 (PDF) Please direct comments on the Report and its appendices to DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3539254 [email protected] RISCAPE team University of Helsinki, INAR, Finland University of Turku, Finland Futures Research Centre, EGI (EGI) https://www.helsinki.fi/ Finland https://www.egi.eu https://www.utu.fi/ Ari Asmi ([email protected]) Gergely Sipos Mika Rantanen Mikkel Knudsen Roberta Piscitelli Marianna Ferreira-Aulu Elizaveta Shabanova-Danielyan European Social Survey ERIC (ESS ERIC) Weiqing Wang Independent editor https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org Jyrki Luukkanen Jari Kaivo-oja Jostein Sundet Lorna Ryan Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON) RISCAPE Stakeholder Panel members Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS ERIC) https://www.astron.nl https://www.icos-ri.eu Maria Uhle Carla Baldovin Carthage Smith Emmanuel Salmon Marjan Timmer Laurent Ghys Rob van der Meer Glenn Moloney Rene Vermeulen Simon Lin The European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Rafael De Andrés Medina (ECRIN) Ronald Stark https://www.ecrin.org/ Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives Algis Krupavicius (CESSDA ERIC) Antonio Sgamellotti Christine Kubiak https://www.cessda.eu Robert McGreevy Serena Battaglia Jostein Sundet Ivana Versic Mark J. Dietrich The Institute Laue-Langevin (ILL) https://www.ill.eu/ Servizi Didattici e Scientifici per l’Università di Firenze (PIN) Miriam Förster https://www.pin.unifi.it Julie Dupré Hannah Walter Franco Niccolucci William G. Stirling (external) Kurt Clausen (external) INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE 2019 A European Perspective CONTENT 06 Introduction 38 6. Energy research 68 10. e-Infrastructures infrastructures 07 1. Framing and scope of 76 11. Conclusions and the report 48 7. Astronomy and General findings Astroparticle research 10 2. Methodology 80 Appendix 1: infrastructures Acknowledgements 14 3. Environmental 54 8. Social Sciences research infrastructures research infrastructures 22 4. Health and food 62 9. Cultural Heritage, research infrastructures Digital Humanities and 30 5. Physical sciences Languages research research infrastructures infrastructures Additional appendices including contact information of the identified RIs are available at https://riscape.eu/riscape-report/ Infrastructures (ESFRI) was founded in 2002, helping in formalising Although large scientific facilities are developed around the world, and establishing deep and committed collaboration for expensive the information about them is not usually found in one place. Thus, but critical Research Infrastructures, where they were needed, in all a consistent analysis of the landscape is needed. Such landscape INTRODUCTION fields of science. analysis can give insights into what the current cover of research support structures is on e.g. a given scientific domain, service type, Research Infrastructures (RIs) is a key element of modern research. ESFRI develops a common European strategy and process for or geographical area. More detailed analysis can also shed light Scientists, research groups and even institutions are no longer Research Infrastructure development and creation, and oversees on operational details, ways to follow scientific impacts, funding always able to provide the tools needed for modern-day research the operations of the European major RIs throughout their lifecycle. models and many other features of such facilities, which can lead to goals. However, creation of Research Infrastructures requires This process has been particularly successful in coordinating Europe- better understanding of collaboration and alignment possibilities for significant investments and special competences, leading to the wide collaborations of smaller facilities towards common distributed researchers, research infrastructures, and science funding bodies. need for national and multinational collaborations creating shared RIs with sustained funding and service models, making it possible to The RISCAPE landscape analysis tries to address many of these and collaborative research facilities. In Europe, this challenge create globally important RIs in the scientific disciplines where they questions. was identified relatively early with the creation of the European were not available before. RIs are no longer a special tool only for Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in the mid-1950s for traditional hard sciences. The RISCAPE analysis has provided new insights on the global particle physics research, and ESO (European Southern Observatory) landscape and the operations, services and organisation of RIs for astronomy in the early 1960s. Both of these large Research Many, or even most, of the scientific problems, and their often- globally, but the work faced several challenges. The scoping of the Infrastructures needed investment beyond the scale of individual associated societal challenges, are not specific to countries or landscape goals led to a concentration on larger, more established countries and proved joint investments for common research goals. regions. Science by its nature thrives on international collaboration. research facilities – of the same level and general type as ESFRI In Europe, this creation of common facilities also supported the Similarly, RIs are typically national or regional, but the need for such initiatives. This means that many interesting and potentially initiation of a joint European Research Area, and set the example facilities reaches far beyond the national borders. In some fields of relevant, e.g. smaller or commercial facilities are not necessarily of joint funding, shared resources and facilities for other fields of science, there is a history of global joint planning of RI development covered within this analysis. This concentration enabled the use of sciences to follow. To support creation of other similar European- and sharing of facility access across the borders, leading to increased more detailed information collection, in the form of an organised scale science facilities, the European Strategic Forum for Research scientific productivity and cost-effectiveness. In some other fields, interview of RI operators, which revealed a much more complete much work is still needed to facilitate alignment and collaboration of view of the facilities involved. At the same time, such methods RI. The first step towards these goals is to establish a knowledge base also required direct contact with the RIs, which was not always about the current status of the global facilities - a motivation for a successful. The analysis also has an intentionally European (and global landscape analysis of the major research infrastructures. ESFRI RI) viewpoint, which will of course influence the types of facilities involved, and the information collected. From this Recently, several European initiatives have worked on creating perspective, the RISCAPE analysis can be considered internally an inventory of European facilities. The ESFRI landscape analysis consistent and indicative, but not a complete view of the global RI concentrated on the largest, European or global scale, RIs. The MERIL landscape. Product of RISCAPE project. The project has received funding from the European projects mapped mostly the smaller but still important facilities in Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 730974 Europe. Several scientific areas (or domains) have also undertaken This report is based upon the eight domain reports that have the task of mapping facilities specific for their needs. However, going systemised the findings of the international mapping of their This report and its contents are provided as a contribution to the outside of European facilities and viewing the overall availability of domains. In chapter 1 the landscape report first describes the ongoing investigation of the global research infrastructure landscape. Research Infrastructures globally has been much less studied, with framing and scope and the point of view used when drawing the Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material contained in this publication; however complete
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Ageing in Place' in Europe
    PhD THESIS DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN DEMOGRAPHY Centre d’Estudis Demogràfics / Departament de Geografia Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ‘Ageing in Place’ in Europe: A multidimensional approach to independent living in later life Celia Fernández-Carro Supervisors: Dr. Juan A. Módenes Dr. Jeroen Spijker September 2013 This PhD Thesis has been carried out as part of the I+D Project Demographic analysis of housing needs in Spain, 2005-2015 funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain (SEJ2007-60119) and directed by Dr. Juan A. Módenes. This thesis has also been funded by the 2013 call of the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) research programme Ayudas a la Investigación . This thesis uses data from SHARE wave 4 release 1.1.1, as of March 28th 2013 or SHARE wave 1 and 2 release 2.5.0, as of May 24th 2011 or SHARELIFE release 1, as of November 24th2010. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT- 2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th Framework Programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5- CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th Framework Programme (SHARE-PREP, N° 211909, SHARE-LEAP, N° 227822 and SHARE M4, N° 261982). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, R21 AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG BSR06-11 and OGHA 04-064) and the German Ministry of Education and Research as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions) Agradecimientos Me gustaría comenzar este trabajo expresando mi gratitud a todas aquellas instituciones y personas que han contribuido a que esta tesis viese la luz.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2018 Pension Adequacy
    PENSION ADEQUACY REPORT 2018 CURRENT AND FUTURE INCOME ADEQUACY IN OLD AGE IN THE EU VOLUME 1 European Commission Directorate-General for Employement, Social Affairs and Inclusion 1049 Brussels BELGIUM Manuscript completed in 2018 Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover photo: ©Shutterstock PDF ISBN 978-92-79-85657-0 doi:10.2767/406275 KE-01-18-457-EN-N European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Social Protection Committee The 2018 Pension Adequacy Report: current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU Volume I Joint Report prepared by the Social Protection Committee (SPC) and the European Commission (DG EMPL) 2018 Acknowledgements The 2018 Pension Adequacy Report (PAR) has been prepared by the Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission (Unit C2 ‘Modernisation of social protection systems’, headed by Radek Malý (until 31 December 2016) and Ana Carla Pereira), in collaboration with the Social Protection Committee (SPC, chaired by Ulrika Hall) and its Working Group on Ageing Issues (SPC WG-AGE, chaired by Andraž Rangus) and the Indicators Sub-group (chaired by Rudi Van Dam, with Volker Schmitt chairing the discussions on the PAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Productivity: Human Capital Accumulation and Depreciation
    Anna Ruzik-Sierdzinska, Maciej Lis, Monika Potoczna, Michele Belloni, Claudia Villosio Materials published here have a working paper character. They can be subject to further publication. The views and opinions expressed here reflect the author(s) point of view and not necessarily those of CASE Network. This report was prepared within a research project entitled NEUJOBS financed by the European Commission, under the 7th Framework Programme. Keywords: Productivity, Age-Earning Profiles, Lifelong Learning JEL codes: J24, J31 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, 2012 Graphic Design: Agnieszka Natalia Bury EAN 9788371785962 Publisher: CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network al. Jana Pawla II 61, office 212, 01-031 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (48 22) 206 29 00, 828 61 33, fax: (48 22) 206 29 01 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.case-research.eu CASE Network Reports No. 114 2 AGE AND PRODUCTIVITY. HUMAN CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND… The CASE Network is a group of economic and social research centers in Poland, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and Belarus. Organizations in the network regularly conduct joint research and advisory projects. The research covers a wide spectrum of economic and social issues, including economic effects of the European integration process, economic relations between the EU and CIS, monetary policy and euro-accession, innovation and competitiveness, and labour markets and social policy. The network aims to increase the range and quality of economic research and information available to policy-makers and civil society, and takes an active role in on-going debates on how to meet the economic challenges facing the EU, post-transition countries and the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy and Action Plan for Healthy Ageing in Europe (2012–2020)
    Regional Committee for Europe Sixty-second session Malta, 10–13 September 2012 Strategy and action plan for healthy ageing in Europe, 2012–2020 Regional Committee for Europe EUR/RC62/10 Rev.1 Sixty-second session + EUR/RC62/Conf.Doc./4 Malta, 10–13 September 2012 10 September 2012 122346 Provisional agenda item 5(c) ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Strategy and action plan for healthy ageing in Europe, 2012–2020 The WHO European Region has a rapidly ageing population. The median age is already the highest in the world, and the proportion of people aged 65 and above is forecast to almost double between 2010 and 2050. The average age of the population and the proportion of people above retirement age are also projected to increase fast, even in countries with life expectancies that are well below the European average. Allowing more people to lead active and healthy lives in later age requires investing in a broad range of policies for healthy ageing, from prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) over the life-course to strengthening health systems, in order to increase older people’s access to affordable, high-quality health and social services. Investing in healthy ageing has become key for the sustainability of health and social policies in Europe. A closing window of opportunity of relative growth of the labour force along with unfavourable economic prospects in many countries in Europe have made the need to step up the implementation of policies for active ageing particularly urgent. This document contains a draft strategy and action plan for healthy ageing in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Forschungsförderungen Und Forschungsaufträge 2009
    III-154 der Beilagen XXIV. GP - Bericht - Hauptdokument Teil 3 1 von 317 Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung www.bmwf.gv.at Forschungsförderungen und Forschungsaufträge 2009 Faktendokumentation der Bundesdienststellen für 2009 Auszug aus der Bundesforschungsdatenbank 2 von 317 III-154 der Beilagen XXIV. GP - Bericht - Hauptdokument Teil 3 Eigentümer, Herausgeber und Verleger: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung Organisation, Layout und Technik: Mag. Irene Danler, DI Sascha Saxinger, Beatrix Schmid Alle BMWF, 1014 Wien, Minoritenplatz 5 Inhalt: Für die vollständige und valide Dateneingabe der Forschungsförderungen und -aufträge ist jedes Bundesministerium in seinem jeweiligen Wirkungsbereich verantwortlich. III-154 der Beilagen XXIV. GP - Bericht - Hauptdokument Teil 3 3 von 317 Faktendokumentation der Bundesdienststellen 2009 Im Jahr 2009 neu vergebene, laufende und abgeschlossene Projekte mit dem Finanzierungsbetrag, dem bisher bezahlten Betrag sowie dem 2009 bezahlten Teilbetrag, mit den Vertrags- und Abschlussdaten geordnet nach der vergebenden Stelle Alle Beträge in Euro 4 von 317 III-154 der Beilagen XXIV. GP - Bericht - Hauptdokument Teil 3 III-154 der Beilagen XXIV. GP - Bericht - Hauptdokument Teil 3 5 von 317 Inhaltsverzeichnis Bundeskanzleramt ............................................................................................ 2 Bundesministerium für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz .............................5 Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur (bis 21.2.2007) ...............13
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Wealth and Household Savings in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE
    Pension Wealth and Household Savings in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE Rob Alessiea,c, Viola Angelinia,c, Peter van Santenb,c,∗ aUniversity of Groningen bSveriges Riksbank cNetspar Abstract We use recently collected retrospective survey data to estimate the displacement effect of pension wealth on household savings. The third wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, SHARELIFE, collects information on the entire job history of the respondent, a fea- ture missing in most previous studies. We show that addressing measurement error problems is crucial to estimate the displacement effect when using survey data. We find that each euro of pension wealth is associated with a 47 (61) cent decline in non–pension wealth using robust (me- dian) regression. In the presence of biases from measurement errors and omitted (unobserved) variables, we estimate a lower bound to the true offset between 17% and 30%, significantly dif- ferent from zero. Instrumental variables regression estimates, although less precise, suggest full displacement. Keywords: Displacement effect, Lifetime income, Retrospective survey, Measurement error JEL: D91, H55, D31. ∗Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Sveriges Riksbank, 103 37, Stockholm, Sweden. Telephone: 00 46 8 787 00 00. Fax: 00 46 8 21 05 31 Email addresses: [email protected] (Rob Alessie), [email protected] (Viola Angelini), [email protected] (Peter van Santen) Preprint submitted to the European Economic Review August 29, 2012 1. Introduction The demographic challenge of ageing populations has led and will lead European countries to reform their pension systems. For policymakers, understanding the effect that pension reforms will have on household and national saving is crucial.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Jansen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ), University Duisburg-Essen
    Country-specific Work/Retirement-Cultures: A normative barrier for raising the standard retirement age? Andreas Jansen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ), University Duisburg-Essen 3rd International ESS Conference, 13-15 July 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland Session: “Social preferences, institutions and performances in the labour market” Preliminary Version; Please do neither cite nor circulate Abstract The study has to clear objectives. The first aim is to explain the still existing variances in the labour market participation of older people in Europe by broadening the set of possible expla- nations by a cultural construct, namely the specific ‘work-retirement-culture' of a country. Sub- sequently it will be analysed if the work-retirement-culture functions as a barrier against re- forms of the pension system that might be reasonable from a pure economic perspective, but are entirely contrary to the respective work/retirement culture. With regard to the first objective, the results give some indications that the work/retirement culture could indeed be a further piece of the puzzle to explain differences in the labour market participation of older people in Europe since an early-exit culture can primarily be observed in countries with a comparably low labour market participation of older people aged between 55 and 64 years, while the opposite is true for countries showing an employment-oriented work/retirement culture. In addition the analysis of the change and persistence of the institutional setting has shown some evidence that the work/retirement culture at least partly functions as a barrier or promoter in pension reforms. Keywords: culture, labour market, transition to retirement, work/retirement culture, pension policy 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    Progress Report 2008–2009 We owe special thanks to the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) for its financial support for numerous projects of the research facilities of the Austrian Academy of Sciences All rights reserved Copyright © 2009 by Austrian Academy of Sciences Layout: Art Quarterly Publishing House Werbe- und PR-Agentur GmbH. Printed and bound: Wograndl 3 Table of contents Preface . 5 RESEARCH FACILITIES OF THE SECTION FOR MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES Biology and Medicine CeMM – Research Center for Molecular Medicine GmbH . 11 Breath Research Institute . 14 GMI – Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology . 18 IMBA – Institute of Molecular Biotechnology GmbH . 22 Institute for Biomedical Aging Research . 26 Institute for Biophysics and Nanosystems Research . 30 Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology . 34 Earth Sciences Institute for Geographic Information Science . 37 Center for Geosciences . 40 Commission for the Palaeontological and Stratigraphical Research of Austria . 42 Commission for Geophysical Research . 45 Commission for Quaternary Research . 48 Commission for Basic Research on Mineral Raw Materials . 51 Mathematics, Simulation and Metrology Institute for Integrated Sensor Systems . 55 Acoustics Research Institute . 58 Johann Radon Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics . 61 Commission for Scientific Visualization . 65 Physics and Materials Sciences Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science . 68 Institute of High Energy Physics . 71 Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information . 74 Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physic. 77 Environmental Research Institute for Limnology . 80 Institute of Technology Assessment . 83 Commission for Interdisciplinary Ecological Studies . 86 Space Research Space Research Institute . 89 Commission for Astronomy . 92 Interdepartmental Research Tasks Commission for Scientific Co-operation with the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports .
    [Show full text]
  • Policies for an Ageing Workforce CEPS
    xtending average working lives by 10 years, while ensuring an adequate social Policies Esafety net for those unable to work into their late 60s and 70s, is a major social Policies for an Ageing Workforce policy challenge today and for the coming decades. Tackling this challenge involves for delving into policy areas that range from working conditions, skills and lifelong an Work-life balance, working conditions learning, pensions, socio-economic inequalities in health and life expectancy to the Ageing design of a much broader agenda on active ageing. and equal opportunities This book covers these issues in succinct chapters based on in-depth research by Workforce the authors. Despite the challenges of demographic ageing, it is important to keep in mind the words of Commissioner Thyssen: “… ageing does not just pose challenges. If Member States promote the right active ageing approach, this also offers opportunities. Firstly, active ageing means more social opportunities. Older people contribute to society too. We should empower them to work, learn and volunteer, according to individual needs, preferences and capacities. Secondly, active ageing means economic opportunities. Older people represent a growing market. Servicing this market will lead to business opportunities and innovations in which Europe could be a leader. And the experience and expertise of older people is an indispensable asset for our economies – an asset that increases further when they can properly pass the torch by mentoring younger generations.” Edited by Mikkel Barslund Authors: R. Anderson, M. Barslund, M. Bönisch, A. Cebulla, H. Dubois, C. Fechter, N. Hudson-Sharp, T. Göllner, J. Klotz, G. Naegele, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Children in Europe How Childcare, Parental Leave and Flexible Working Arrangements Interact in Europe
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Retirement in Europe
    Bo Honoré and Áureo de Paula Joint Retirement in Europe DP 10/2014-052 Joint Retirement in Europe∗ Bo E. Honor´e y Princeton University Aureo´ de Paula z UCL, S~aoPaulo School of Economics-FGV, CeMMAP, IFS and CEPR This Version: October 2014 Abstract In this project we study joint retirement of couples in Europe. We characterize various empirical regularities and use a model for simultaneous duration variables developed in Honor´eand de Paula (2014). Whereas conventionally used duration models cannot account for joint retirement, our model admits joint retirement with positive probability, allows for simultaneity and nests the traditional proportional hazards model. In contrast to other statistical models for simultaneous durations, it is based on Nash bargaining and it is therefore interpretable in terms of economic behavior. We focus on the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA). JEL Codes: J26, C41, C3. ∗We acknowledge financial support from Netspar. Bo Honor´ealso acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation and from the Gregory C. Chow Econometric Research Program. Aureo´ de Paula also acknowledges financial support from the Economic and Social Research Council through the ESRC Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice grant RES-589-28-0001 and the European Research Council through the ERC Starting Grant 338187. Priscilla Fialho provided very able research assistance. yPrinceton University (Department of Economics), Princeton, NJ 08542. E-mail: [email protected] zUniversity College London (Department of Economics), S~aoPaulo School of Economics-FGV, CeMMAP and IFS, London, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction and Related Literature This project investigates the determinants of joint couples' retirement decisions in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) As Active Ageing Index Data Source
    Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) as Active Ageing Index data source Brief July 2019 Co-funded by the Note This brief is prepared within the framework of the joint project by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the European Commission’s Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG EMPL). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontier or boundaries. This brief has been prepared for UNECE and the European Commission. However, it should not be regarded as an official statement of these two organisations’ policies, and these organisations cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The brief should be referred to as: UNECE / European Commission (2019) “Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) as Active Ageing Index data source”, prepared by Yolanda González-Rábago and Antía Domínguez-Rodríguez of the University of the Basque Country (Bilbao), under contract with United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (Geneva), co-funded by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (Brussels). Co-funded by the Research Group on Social Determinants of Health and Demographic Change www.ehu.eus/opik Table of content Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Comparability of indicators and availability of data .................................................................. 4 Domain 1.
    [Show full text]