New Zealand PM-Elect Holds Talks with Minor Party Leaders to Form Government 15:54, November 10, 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

New Zealand PM-elect holds talks with minor party leaders to form government 15:54, November 10, 2008 Negotiations to form the next New Zealand government began on Monday with Prime Minister-elect John Key entering talks with ACT party leader Rodney Hide in Wellington. It was the first in a series of meetings which Key hoped will allow him to put together a government within a week. After their one-hour talks at the Parliament on Monday, Hide confirmed ACT will support a National-led government, a move which will allow Key to become prime minister. Hide gave a commitment that his five MPs will support National. He is expecting at least one, if not two, ministerial posts for ACT members, however they are likely to be outside of cabinet. Key and Hide will meet again Tuesday afternoon to continue their talks. Key said he intended to do more work on the line-up of his Cabinet on Monday night and Tuesday. "It alters slightly depending on the requests from the other parties that we might work with, but I've got a framework in my head, but there's a few moving parts and I'm just working my way through that." National has enough seats to govern with potential coalition partners ACT and United Future, after a sweeping victory in the 2008 general election on Saturday. Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia, who will meet Key along with co-leader Pita Sharples, said Key has told her he is keen to form a relationship with her party. Key told Radio New Zealand on Monday that when the government is finalized he plans to focus on the economy, and said it was crucial that New Zealand gets on a high growth path. "Hopefully just the sheer change of government will give some confidence to the economy, that we are going to put economic growth at the top of the agenda" he said. However, Key said the international position is still unstable and New Zealand is in recession. He said the government will have to work very hard to get the country on the right footing on the backdrop of what will be a difficult economic position. Key plans to support the manufacturing sector by bringing inflation under control and easing pressure on interest rates. While many exporters cannot compete with low wage economies, Key said it is important that exporters are competitive at adding value to their products. In the first 100 days of office, Key's priorities are legislation for April tax cuts, and reform of the Resource Management Act. He will hold talks with United Future leader Peter Dunne on Monday afternoon and Maori Party leaders Tariana Turia and Pita Sharples on Tuesday. National, with 59 seats, only needs ACT's five seats to govern, but Key has said he is keen to form as broad-based a government as possible. "Source:Xinhua" .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Protecting Our Children: Services for Children in Care
The Treasury Budget 2011 Information Release Release Document June 2011 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2011 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: [1] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [2] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by ministers and officials [3] 9(2)(g)(i) - to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions [4] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [5] 9(2)(k) - to prevent the disclosure of official information for improper gain or improper advantage [6] 9(2)(j) - to enable the Crown to negotiate without disadvantage or prejudice [7] 6(a) - to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the government [8] 9(2)(h) - to maintain legal professional privilege [9] 6(c) - to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial [10] 9(2)(d) - to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand [11] 9(2)(i) - to enable the Crown to carry out commercial activities without disadvantage or prejudice. Where information has been withheld, a numbered reference to the applicable section of the Official Information Act has been made, as listed above.
[Show full text]
Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand
FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 7 August 2013 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Freepost Parliament, Adams, Hon Amy Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 6831 Minister for the Environment Wellington 6160 (04) 817 6531 Minister for Communications Selwyn National [email protected] and Information Technology Associate Minister for Canter- 829 Main South Road, Templeton (03) 344 0418/419 bury Earthquake Recovery Christchurch Fax: (03) 344 0420 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Ardern, Jacinda List Labour Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9388 Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 472 7036 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 817 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6445 Ardern, Shane Taranaki–King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Auchinvole, Chris List National (04) 817 6936 Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9392 Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh National List Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 473 0469 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Banks, Hon John Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Leader, ACT party Wellington 6160 Minister for Regulatory Reform [email protected] (04) 817 9999 Minister for Small Business ACT Epsom Fax
[Show full text]
Thank You, Maori Party! the in the United Nations Ensuring That Asks “What on That List Could Any Neither Amnesty Nor Mercy
12 Thursday 30th April, 2009 “We are by C.A. Saliya human shields by the LTTE to delay their final defeat in this bat- against...from page 8 Auckland, New Zealand tle: Ealam war IV. It is a grave mis- Thank you, take to be carried away by LTTE o the members of parliament propaganda and believe that this A lot of schools, hospitals and of the Maori Party; Hon. Dr terrorist outfit really cares about houses have been constructed and TPita Sharples—Co-Leader, the Tamil people. despite the allegation that Moscow Hon. Tariana Turia—Co-leader, Hone Harawira, the foreign was fighting against Muslims, now Hone Harawira, Te Ururoa Flavell, affairs spokesman for the Maori when Chechnya is within the Maori Party Whip, Rahui Reid Maori Party! Party, asked the New Zealand Russian federation, the biggest and Katene. Government to reinforce the mes- most beautiful mosque in Europe This is written in appreciation of sage that the Sri Lankan was constructed recently in Groznyy The Maori Party’s decision to block Government needed to exercise - equal to the best mosques in Saudi the motion expressing concern restraint against the Tamil Tigers Arabia. So life is quite normal there. about the Sri Lankan “humanitari- which is now in its last enclave. This is the way we hope the govern- an situation”; that is, the fighting The report that “Waiariki MP Te ment in Sri Lanka will also go, against LTTE terrorists by the Ururoa Flavell loudly objected to because it is most important to find Government forces of Sri Lanka.
[Show full text]
Rawiri Taonui: Partnership Gives Reason for Hope
Rawiri Taonui: Partnership gives reason for hope John Key (pictured here at Waitangi) enjoys an approval rating among Maori of 47 per cent. Photo / Brett Phibbs In recent weeks the descendants of the Maori prophet Wiremu Tahupotiki Ratana gave their blessing to the one-year-old National-Maori Party partnership. Prime Minister John Key's no-baggage, no-nonsense, straight-talking "let's work together" style is a race relations revelation. He knows what matters and what doesn't (flying two flags is not a drama), and where the boundaries lie - "let the Maori Party deal with Hone Harawira, he is their member". The twin pillars of the Maori Party leadership, Tariana Turia and Pita Sharples, have also been important. Dignified, thoughtful and strong, they are the best Maori political leaders since Princess Te Puea and Apirana Ngata. This triumvirate knows that working together is about trust, keeping things simple and the freedom to disagree. The win over Labour at Ratana belies deeper waters ahead. Waitangi Day looms large with several in Ngapuhi set to fly the St George Cross of the Confederation ensign instead of the newly chosen Rangatiratanga flag. There is room for embarrassment as the debate plays out on Hone Heke Harawira's home turf. Budget 2010 signals the roll out of the whanau ora, with some estimating up to $1 billion in resources devolved to Maori social service providers. Modelled on successful initiatives in health - where the increase of Maori providers from 0 to 275 in 25 years has had real impact - they understand issues better, know the communities, and don't suffer the ingrained prejudices built up over multiple generations in mainstream institutions.
[Show full text]
Māori Economic Development Taskforce
IWI Infrastructure and Investment Māori Economic Development Taskforce May 2010 E te kāhui tipua, Nei rā te reo o Aoraki maunga e topa atu ana ki a koutou hai mihi. E kore rawa tā Tahu Pōtiki puna whakamihi e mimiti noa. Ko koutou tērā e whakaheke mōtuhi ana kia whai oranga ai te iwi Māori. Kua roa nei koutou e whakaporo riaka ana kia ea ai ngā wawata o ō koutou ake whānau, o ō koutou ake hapū, o ō koutou ake iwi. Ko ngā puapua ki aromea kua tutuki i a koutou. Nō reira, kei te mihi. Eke panuku, eke Tangaroa. Nā koutou te reo karanga, nā mātou ngā kupu tautoko kia okea ururoatia ngā taunāhua o te iwi Māori. E ai ki te whakataukī a ō tātou nei tūpuna, ki te kotahi te kākaho ka whati, ki te kāpuia te kākaho e kore e whati. Nō reira e aku rangatira, nei rā te karanga o Aoraki maunga ki ngā tōpito katoa o te motu kia karapinepine mai i raro i te whakaaro kotahi. Nō reira e aku manukura, nau mai tauti mai ki raro i tōna poho hai wānanga, hai kōrerorero, hai ara whakamua mō tātou, ā, mō kā uri ā muri ake nei. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These materials have been prepared by Mark Solomon under the Māori Economic Taskforce. The Māori Economic Taskforce was established in March 2009 as a result of the Māori Economic Summit and is a key initiative for the enhancement of Māori economic prosperity. On 28 January 2009, the Minister of Māori Aff airs held an Economic Summit to canvass ideas and potential initiatives to ensure Māori could both mitigate the eff ects of the economic downturn and position themselves to reap the benefi ts of economic recovery.
[Show full text]
Simon Lusk's Plan
CHAPTER 5 SIMON LUSK’S PLAN Simon Lusk had been watching US Republican politics for years and looking for ideas that were applicable to New Zealand. Gradually he put together a plan to move the country’s politics to the right. He laid this out in conver- sations with his close political allies and in a three-page strategy paper that was never intended to be made public. The plan was practical and methodical. The idea was to target candidate selection processes in safe National seats, installing a rump of hard right candi- dates who would influence politics for many years to come. Suitable candidates could also be found and trained for local government elections. At the same time, a pool of younger people would be identified, cultivated and guided into right-wing politics. Each of these groups would be managed and supported by professional strategy advisers, notably Lusk himself. Such figures were familiar in US politics but not in New Zealand. Lusk was also well aware, from his American observations, that the single greatest advantage of right-wing parties and candidates was their ability to greatly outspend their opponents with support from wealthy and corporate donors. Fundraising was central to the plan. Next, the right could dominate the media by the dominance of right-wing blogs: ‘the right currently controls the blogosphere,’ he wrote, ‘and political journalists repeat much of what appears on blogs.’ The blogs were part of the second track of politics available for ‘black ops’ and nega- tive campaigning. Finally, his plan involved ‘weakening the power of those who believe in big government’, meaning deliberate strategies and tactics to margin- alise anyone, even within the National Party itself, who did not hold hard right views.
[Show full text]
Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand
Accounting for Diversity: Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand Prepared by Dena Ringold With funding from the sponsors of the Ian Axford Fellowship in Public Policy July 2005 © Fulbright New Zealand 2005 ISBN 0-437-10213-7 i The Ian Axford Fellowships in Public Policy We acknowledge and thank the following corporate and government sponsors that support the programme: • ERMA New Zealand • LEK Consulting • The Department of Internal Affairs • The Department of Labour • The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet • The Ministry for the Environment • The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry • The Ministry of Economic Development • The Ministry of Education • The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade • The Ministry of Health • The Ministry of Justice • The Ministry of Research, Science and Technology • The Ministry of Social Development • The State Services Commission • The Treasury The Ian Axford Fellowships were named in honour of Sir Ian Axford, a New Zealand astrophysicist and space scientist. Since his education in New Zealand, England and later at Cornell University and the University of California, Sir Ian has been closely involved in the planning of several space missions, notably the Voyager probes to the outer planets. Since 1974, Sir Ian has been director of the Max Planck Institute of Aeronomy in Germany. He is the recipient of many notable science awards and was named “New Zealander of the Year” for 1995. In the world of space science, Sir Ian has emerged as one of the great thinkers and communicators, and a highly respected and influential administrator. Currently, he is working to create the first mission to interstellar space with the Voyager spacecraft.
[Show full text]
Download Download
Mike Reid The Problem with Defining Core Services One of the fundamental challenges faced by those who design governance systems involves determining at which level of government public decisions should be made, and whether the decisions are overwhelmingly political, managerial, technical, or should be left for citizens to make themselves. When designing democratic systems one of the critical considerations is ensuring that decision-making power is well distributed to avoid risks to citizens’ liberty. These questions are currently on the minds of people involved with local government. Since its election in 2008 the current government has initiated Act 2002, the minister of local government, Rodney Hide, a number of policy debates that directly broach the question stated that councils should focus on core services, which in of who should be making decisions about the nature and his view meant: role of local government. While the question of Auckland while there is no definition of core services for local governance (see Reid, 2009) has been in the headlines, the government, I would expect there to be general acceptance debate has recently been extended by the addition of two that it includes transport services (roading, footpaths and further issues: who should determine what councils do and public transport); water services (water supply, sewage how should this occur? It is an issue which burst into life treatment, stormwater and flood protection) and public with the release of a Cabinet paper entitled ‘Improving health and safety services (refuse collection and regulation Local Government Transparency, Accountability and Fiscal of nuisances). (Cabinet Office, 2009, p.4) Management’ (TAFM) (Cabinet Office, 2009).
[Show full text]
The Legitimacy of Private Actors Wielding State Coercive Power in New Zealand
ANUSHA WIJEWICKRAMA THE LEGITIMACY OF PRIVATE ACTORS WIELDING STATE COERCIVE POWER IN NEW ZEALAND Submitted for the LLB (Honours) Degree Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington 2017 1 Contents I Introduction……………………………………………………………………………...2 II State Coercive Power: Key Themes…………………………………………………..4 III Examples of State Coercive Power in New Zealand………………………………..7 IV Accountability…………………………………………………………………………..12 V Transparency……………………………………………………………………………31 VI Effectiveness…………………………………………………………………………….34 VII Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...39 2 States are increasingly conferring power upon private actors to perform traditionally public services. In New Zealand, this extends to private actors wielding state coercive power. This paper explores the accountability of private actors wielding coercive power, and therefore how legitimate devolution of power is to them. Transparency and effectiveness are also, more briefly, examined. Analysis reveals that if a private actor does not share key goals and values with its public sector counterpart, or with the instrument establishing the coercive power, moral hazard may develop as the actor seeks to pursue its own agenda at the expense of its obligations. Loss of legitimacy can result, particularly if actors appear to be morally culpable for ineffective use of state coercive power. Ultimately, interim, ongoing accountability mechanisms and robust transparency measures must be properly implemented, if legitimacy of the devolution of power to private actors is to be sustained. Key
[Show full text]
Relating Maori and Pakeha : the Politics of Indigenous and Settler
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Relating Maori and Pakeha: the politics of indigenous and settler identities A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology at Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand Avril Bell 2004 Abstract Settler colonisation produced particular colonial subjects: indigene and settler. The specificity of the relationship between these subjects lies in the act of settlement; an act of colonial violence by which the settler physically and symbolically displaces the indigene, but never totally. While indigenes may be physically displaced from their territories, they continue to occupy a marginal location within the settler nation-state. Symbolically, as settlers set out to distinguish themselves from the metropolitan ‘motherlands’, indigenous cultures become a rich, ‘native’ source of cultural authenticity to ground settler nationalisms. The result is a complex of conflictual and ambivalent relations between settler and indigene. This thesis investigates the ongoing impact of this colonial relation on the contemporary identities and relations of Maori (indigene) and Pakeha (settlers) in Aotearoa New Zealand. It centres on the operation of discursive strategies used by both Maori and Pakeha in constructing their identities and the relationship between them. I analyse ‘found’ texts - non-fiction books, media and academic texts - to identify discourse ‘at work’, as New Zealanders make and reflect on their identity claims.
[Show full text]
Public Questions Network News December 2011 May 2011 Kia Ora, Advent and Christmas Greetings Friends
Contact: Betsan Martin Email: [email protected] Ph: 04 473-2627/ 021-388-337 Public Questions Network News December 2011 May 2011 Kia ora, Advent and Christmas greetings friends Contents: Methodist Conference Inequality Elections and Public Questions media release Environment - fracking Green Paper and Welfare Reform Item for Parish newsletters Methodist Conference President John Roberts gave a very strong lead on social and environmental justice in his induction address. He re-ignited the ‘preferential option for the poor’ as a gospel based focus on justice, and highlighted that the growing inequality in Aotearoa-New Zealand is an affront to growing a fair society. Council of Conference Mission Priority, which was agreed to at Conference is: ‘let the Children Live, ending child poverty, child abuse and youth suicide in New Zealand.’ During the Public Questions session at Conference we asked for discussion on two questions: 1. What would you like to say to political leaders about poverty and inequality? 2. What do you suggest that churches can do about poverty and inequality? We produced a resource for parish discussions from the Conference discussion. This is on the Public Questions website< www.methodist.org.nz/public_questions_network > Elections and Public Questions Media Release Elections have delivered us a National led government in coalition with the Māori Party, United Future and Act. This gives the Government 64 seats – a little more than the majority of 61 needed for the Government to pass legislation. Some portfolios are the same, such as Bill English as Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister. Paula Bennett as Minister of Social Development is promoted to the front bench.
[Show full text]
The Ministry of Public Input
The Ministry of Public Input: Report and Recommendations for Practice By Associate Professor Jennifer Lees-Marshment The University of Auckland, New Zealand August 2014 www.lees-marshment.org [email protected] Executive Summary Political leadership is undergoing a profound evolution that changes the role that politicians and the public play in decision making in democracy. Rather than simply waiting for voters to exercise their judgement in elections, political elites now use an increasingly varied range of public input mechanisms including consultation, deliberation, informal meetings, travels out in the field, visits to the frontline and market research to obtain feedback before and after they are elected. Whilst politicians have always solicited public opinion in one form or another, the nature, scale, and purpose of mechanisms that seek citizen involvement in policy making are becoming more diversified and extensive. Government ministers collect different forms of public input at all levels of government, across departments and through their own offices at all stages of the policy process. This expansion and diversification of public input informs and influences our leaders’ decisions, and thus has the potential to strengthen citizen voices within the political system, improve policy outcomes and enhance democracy. However current practice wastes both resources and the hope that public input can enrich democracy. If all the individual public input activities government currently engages in were collated and added up it would demonstrate that a vast amount of money and resources is already spent seeking views from outside government. But it often goes unseen, is uncoordinated, dispersed and unchecked. We need to find a way to ensure this money is spent much more effectively within the realities of government and leadership.
[Show full text]