DOCSLIB.ORG

12Th National Light Rail Conference “Sustaining the Metropolis: LRT & Streetcars for Super Cities”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12Th National Light Rail Conference “Sustaining the Metropolis: LRT & Streetcars for Super Cities” 12th National Light Rail Conference “Sustaining the Metropolis: LRT & Streetcars for Super Cities” Welcome to Salt Lake City’s Expanding Light Rail System 12th National Light Rail Conference “Sustaining the Metropolis: LRT & Streetcars for Super Cities” Status of North American Light Rail Projects – 2012 John Schumann Senior Transportation Consultant LTK, Portland, Oregon 1972 - 8 US + 1 Canada 2012 - 38 Metro Regions: 34 US + 4 Canada “New Age” Light Rail Low Floor, Low Platform (Portland, Houston) High Floor, High Platform (Los Angeles) Norfolk: The Tide (Opened 2011) 7.4 miles, 11 stations 9 LRVs (as option on Charlotte procurement) 4,300 weekday rides . Extensions planned . Va Beach r-o-w purchased; 2012 referendum Seattle: Central Link (2009) . 14.5 miles . 65 LFLRVs . 28,000 Rides/Day LRT in Sound Transit’s regional program: Central Link, Seattle-SEA (15.6 mi), 2009 University Link, (3.5 mi), 2015 Further LRT Lines North-East-South Central Phoenix East Valley LRT (2008) . 19.6 miles . 50 LFLRVs . 41,300+ rides . Mesa Extensions Building & Planned . 3.1-mi Northwest extension to open 2016 . Future lines for full 57-mi system by 2025 Charlotte: Lynx South Line (2007) 9.6 miles 20 LRVs 15,500 rides . Northeast Extension, 11 miles, by 2016 . More LRT, streetcar, commuter rail planned Hiawatha (2004) 12.3 miles 27 LRVs Next: Central to St Paul 32,400 Rides 39% New to Transit . Openings: Central – 2014, Southwest – 2018 . Future: Bottineau LRT? Minneapolis & St. Paul streetcars? Houston (2004) – Building More Lines . Open 2004: 7.5 mi, 18 LRVs, 37,400 rides/day . Downtown-TX Med Center-Reliant Park . Adding 40 miles, 5 branches . Construction over 60% complete on 3 lines . Buying 19 Siemens & 39 CAF LFLRVs Hudson-Bergen (2000) 15.1 miles 57 LRVs 45,000 rides . North to Englewood? Tenafly? Closter? . South to Staten Island? Salt Lake (1999) – From a Line to a System 35.7 miles 146 LRVs (77 “LF” S-70) 55,700 weekday rides Extensions Open: S. Jordan-10 mi & W. Valley-5 mi Soon: Airport-6 mi, Draper-4 mi, Sugar House-2 mi 77 Low Floor LRVs – Transitioning to Level Boarding Dallas (1996) – Doubling Again System doubled after 1996 opening SE, NW & West extensions doubling again Stcars: City Place Extension; New Oak Cliff Entire Fleet Stretched 77.4 miles 163 LRVs 74,200 weekday rides Denver (1994) – Continuing to Grow 34.7 miles 172 LRVs 69,300 rides . West LRT: 12 mi, 2013 . I-225 LRT Extension: 10.5 mi, 2016 . FasTracks: 119 mi LRT/Commuter Rail St. Louis (1993) 45.5 miles 87 LRVs 54,800+ rides 8.0 mi, $678 million, Forest Park-Clayton- Shrewsbury, 22 LRVs, opened 2006 Baltimore (1992) 29 miles 53 LRVs 28,500 rides . Finished double tracking, 2006 . Planning for Red Line LRT & city streetcars LA (1990) – Growth Continues 70.2 miles, Blue-Green-Gold-Aqua 172 LRVs 182,500 weekday rides 50 P2550 LRVs Extensions: Expo Phase 1, 9.6 mi, 2012; Phase 2, 6.7 mi, 2015 Montclair, 11.5 mi, 2014 Central Connector, 1.9 mi, 2019 San Jose (1987) – Preparing for NFL Football 42.2 miles 100 LRVs 32,600 rides/weekday Completed extensions: Tasman E/Capitol & Vasona Began Limited Express Service Sacramento (1987) – More LRT Coming 38.7 miles 76 LRVs (+21) 47,500 rides Peter Ehrlich Photo DNA, 1.1 mi open 2012, plan 12 mi to airport South, 4.3 mi to Cosumnes Rvr Col, 2015 Contract awarded to renovate 21 ex-VTA cars Portland (1986) – More MAX 52.3 miles 127 LRVs (+18 Type 5) 132,800 weekday rides 2015 – Milwaukie MAX, 7.3 mi; streetcars San Diego (1981) Renews & Restructures 52.5 miles Old Town Trolley-Coaster Transfers 152 LRVs 94,300 rides Green Line extended to CBD Blue Line Infrastructure Renovation Mid-Coast, 10.7 mi, in design for 2018 Calgary (1981) – Adding New Lines 27.7 miles 160 LRVs 280,000 weekday rides . West, 5.2 miles, opens 2013 . Plan extensions Southeast & North, LFLRVs Edmonton (1978) Extensions South & North 13.1 miles 70 LRVs 94,000 weekday rides . 5-mi South Line, 2010 . 2.8-mile Churchill to NAIT, opens 2014 Buffalo (1985) & Cleveland 15.4 miles Buffalo 48 LRVs 15,100 weekday rides Cleveland/Shaker Hts System Modernization Projects, e.g., rebuilt Buckeye-Woodhill Station 6.4 miles 27 LRVs 20,300 weekday rides Brian Weinberg Photo “Legacy” Light Rail & Streetcar Systems Boston Rebuilds, Renews, Re-Equips Green Line Network 25.6 miles 216 LRVs 248,900 weekday rides Planned: Lechmere-Medford Extension Newark Penn Sta-Broad St Sta, 1.0 mi, 2006 6.3 miles 16 LRVs 17,000 weekday rides Philadelphia Runs & Renews 42.5 miles 141 LRV + 18 PCC II 105,000 rides ADA-Compliant PCC II Pittsburgh – Opens North Shore Connector 25.0 miles 83 LRVs 28,500 rides Valerie Harvey Photo . North Shore Connector opened March 2012 SF Muni: Third Street Done, Onward to Chinatown 30.7 miles 151 LRVs + 34 Stcars 158,500 rides/day Third Street Phase 1, opened 2007 Central Subway, Phase 2, 1.6 mi, 2017 E-Embarcadero – New Waterfront Service Toronto – Big City/Big System 48.9 miles 248 LRVs >50million rides/year . Procuring 204 LFLRVs . Metrolinx: .Add new LRT lines, LFLRVs New Orleans Restoring System 14.2 miles 66 streetcars 21,100 rides Extensions: NOUPT, 0.8 mi. 2013; French Quarter, 2.5 mi, 2014 Streetcars – Modern & Vintage Memphis Main Street Trolley (1993) 7.0 miles 20 streetcars 5,300+ rides Matt Pirmann Photo Future extension? Airport, ~ 9 miles Kenosha PCCs (2000) 0.9 mile 8 PCC cars 200-300 rides/day Under Study: Extension through downtown TECO Trolley, Tampa - Ybor City (2002) . 2.3 miles Will Pinellas County . 10 replicas, 1 S.T. LRT be next? . 600 rides/day Little Rock River Rail (2004) . River Rail, 3.4 mi . 5 Replica Birneys . 400 Rides/day . Links Downtown Little Rock, No. Little Rock, Alltel Arena, Clinton Library Portland Streetcar (2001) – Opens Eastside (2012) 7.3 miles 11 Streetcars (+5/6) 12,000 weekday rides 2012 – Eastside Streetcar, 3.3 mi 2015 – Streetcars join Milwaukie MAX on new Willamette River bridge crossing Tacoma & Seattle Streetcars Tacoma Link (2003) . 1.6 miles . 3 vehicles . 2,000+ rides/day . City Study Future Lines Seattle SLU (2007) . 1.3 miles . 3 vehicles (+6 1st Hill) . 2,500+ rides/day . First Hill, 2.5 mi, 2014 New Streetcars Under Construction & Planned . Atlanta Streetcar . 2.6 mi, 4 cars, due 2013 . Cincinnati Streetcar . 3.7 mi, 5 cars, due 2013 . Tucson Streetcar . 3.8 mi, 7 cars, due 2013 . Washington, DC Streetcar . 2.7 mi, 5 cars, due 2014 . Dallas (Oak Cliff) . 1.6 mi, 2 cars, due 2014 . “In the Pipeline” Detroit, Fort Lauderdale, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Northern Virginia, Oklahoma City, Providence, San Antonio, Santa Ana & others “Light” Diesel Multiple Units Call them “Honorary Light Rail”? Ottawa (2001) O-Train Rebuilds for Growth 5.0 miles 3 “light” DMUs 12,000 weekday rides Rebuild/re-equip for more frequent service 7.7-Mile LRT, 2013 Construction Start South Jersey RiverLine (2004) 34 miles 20 “light” DMUs 9,200 Weekday Rides . DMU/Freight - day/night time separation . Camden-Trenton, Opened 2004 North San Diego Sprinter (2008) . 22 miles . 12 “light” DMUs . 7,900 rides Austin MetroRail - “Light” DMU (2010) . 32 miles, 6 “light” DMUs . 1,700 weekday rides . Elgin DMU Line? . CBD-Capitol-UT Streetcars? Denton County A-Train (2011) . 21 miles, 11 “light” DMUs . 1,400 weekday rides What Does All This Show? . After 40 years, Light Rail is thriving . Permutations serve various niches: . Electric LRT linking cities and suburbs . Electric Streetcars as urban circulators . Light DMU’s for longer, lower-cost start-up lines . A place for every mode, and every mode in its place LRT – Streetcars – Light DMUs: Roles for all in Super Cities Thank you & enjoy the conference! End .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple
    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbatim Comments
    2011 CALTRAIN RIDER SURVEY On-Board Survey VERBATIM COMMENTS Prepared by COREY, CANAPARY & GALANIS RESEARCH 447 Sutter Street – Penthouse North San Francisco, CA 94108 2011 CALTRAIN ONBOARD RIDER SURVEY . VERBATIM COMMENTS CONTENTS VERBATIM COMMENTS BY CATEGORY Coding of respondent comments was done to provide a department specific or subject specific listing of comments. These department/subject specific categories are listed below. 1. Schedules/Frequency .................................................................... 4 – 11 2. Routes/Stops .................................................................................... 12 3. On-time Performance/Reliability................................................... 13 – 19 4. Delay Information/Service Announcements/Updates .................... 20 – 29 5. Transit Connections/Transfers ...................................................... 30 – 31 6. Crowding/Seat Availability.................................................................... 32 7. Fares/Fare Policy/Ticket Validation Procedure .............................. 33 – 39 8. Personnel ..................................................................................... 40 – 46 9. Enforcement/Security................................................................... 47 – 50 10. Safety Issues ........................................................................................ 51 11. Bikes/Bike Cars ............................................................................ 52 – 54 12. Train Cleanliness-Exterior/Interior................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Southern California's Future on Track
    Keeping Southern California’s 25Future on Track CONTENTS Message from the Board Chair .........................1 CEO’s Message .....................................................3 A Quarter Century of Moving People: The Metrolink Story .............................................5 How It All Began ................................................19 Metrolink’s Top Priority: Safety .......................27 WHO WE ARE Environment ........................................................31 Metrolink is Southern California’s regional commuter rail service in its Metrolink Relieves Driving Stress ...................35 25th year of operation. Metrolink is governed by The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Board Members Past and Present ..................40 a joint powers authority made up of an 11-member board representing Metrolink Pioneering Staff the transportation commissions of Still on Board ......................................................47 Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. Metrolink Employees Metrolink operates seven routes Put Customers First ...........................................48 through a six-county, 538-route-mile network with 60 stations. Facts at a Glance ...............................................50 For more information, including how to ride, go to www.metrolinktrains.com MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide safe, efficient, dependable and on-time transportation service that offers outstanding customer experience and enhances quality of life. For
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • ANC6A Resolution No. 2021-002
    ANC 6A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-002 Resolution regarding ANC 6A support for completing the DC Streetcar from Benning Road Metro Station to Georgetown as Planned and Promised WHEREAS, Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (ANCs) were created to “advise the Council of the District of Columbia, the Mayor, and each executive agency with respect to all proposed matters of District government policy,” including transportation and economic development; WHEREAS, public transportation is a shared public benefit and can only function as such when it’s shared with all neighborhoods; WHEREAS, ANC 7E recently passed a resolution of support for the streetcar extension to Benning Road Metro station; WHEREAS, the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) recently published its Final Environmental Assessment where it found the extension to Benning Metro Station is the preferred alternative and only feasible alternative from an engineering perspective; WHEREAS, the eastward extension to Benning Road Metro is the only feasible alternative that provides a multi-modal connection to Metro; WHEREAS, the eventual westward extension to Georgetown would establish the only east-west rail-transit option for travel all the way to Georgetown; WHEREAS, the eventual westward extension to Georgetown would be the first and only fully unified transit system from eastern portions of the District to Georgetown; WHEREAS, the full streetcar route from Benning Road Metro to Georgetown would provide an enjoyable and robust east-west transportation option for residents in ward 6 and
    [Show full text]
  • Benning Road Reconstruction and Streetcar Project
    Benning Road Reconstruction and Streetcar Project overview The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) has initiated the final design phase of the Benning Road Reconstruction and Streetcar Project. This final design phase will continue the work to improve the Benning Road corridor to safely and efficiently accommodate all modes of transportation following the approval of the Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment (EA) in November 2020. The draft EA was published in 2016 and modified during the preliminary engineering phase of the project in 2019 and 2020. The project will improve safety conditions and operations, address deficiencies in infrastructure, and provide additional transit options in Ward 7 and Ward 5 and along the approximately two miles of Benning Road NE from Oklahoma Avenue NE to East Capitol Street. This includes: • Enhancing safety and operations along the • Enhancing and installing pedestrian and bicycle corridor and at key intersections facilities • Improving transportation infrastructure conditions • Extending DC Streetcar transit service to the Benning Road Metrorail station • Rehabilitating roadways and bridges that cross the Anacostia River, DC-295, and CSX freight rail tracks Community needs, preferences, and input voiced during past studies—including the DC Transit Future System Plan, DDOT Benning Road Streetcar Extension Study, and Benning Road Corridor Redevelopment Framework Plan and EA—will help shape and inform the project to improve access, operations, and safety for all users along Benning Road Public involvement will be continuous throughout this next phase of the project, which seeks to connect Ward 7 and Ward 5 neighborhoods to employment, activity centers, the regional Metrorail system, and multimodal transportation services at Union Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubai: CREATING the WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 Special
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Paris tram network reaches 65km l AnsaldoBreda enters Chinese LRT market l Edinburgh tramway to open early? DUBAI: CREATING THE WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 special Olsztyn Halberstadt Poland’s first How do you new-build sustain a system tramway in with a declining over 50 years population? DECEMBER 2012 No. 900 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 PESA Bydgoszcz SA 85-082 Bydgoszcz, ul. Zygmunta Augusta 11 tel. (+48)52 33 91 104 fax (+48)52 3391 114 www.pesa.pl e-mail: [email protected] Layout_Adpage.indd 1 26/10/2012 16:15 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 448 News 448 DECEMBER 2012 Vol. 75 No. 900 Three new lines take Paris tram network to 65km; www.tramnews.net Mendoza inaugurates light rail services; AnsaldoBreda EDITORIAL signs Chinese technology partnership; München orders Editor: Simon Johnston Siemens new Avenio low-floor tram. Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. 454 Olsztyn: Re-adopting the tram Associate Editor: Tony Streeter Marek Ciesielski reports on the project to build Poland’s E-mail: [email protected] first all-new tramway in over 50 years. Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. 457 15 Minutes with... Gérard Glas 454 E-mail: [email protected] Tata Steel’s CEO tells TAUT how its latest products offer News Editor: John Symons a step-change reduction in long-term maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton's Hanover 601 Streetcar Returned to Germany
    Edmonton’s Hanover 601 Streetcar returned to Germany After more than a decade in Edmonton, “Hanover 601”, the red and white streetcar that plied the rails atop the world’s highest streetcar bridge, has been returned to its native Germany to celebrate the 125th anniversary of public transit in Hanover. It will become part of a museum collection in that city. The streetcar was sold for $1.00 and departed Edmonton on September 16th. The six-axle high performance car dates from 1970 and was one of two, 600 built by Linke-Hoffman-Busch with Kiepe electrics, and 601 built by Düwag with Siemens equipment, as prototypes to replace the Hanover streetcar fleet. After testing, the operator ÜSTRA decided on eight-axle cars, and so the pair were returned to their respective builders. Boston and San Francisco wanted to bring 601 over as a prototype for a joint fleet renewal program, but this was nixed by Nixon who insisted on home grown vehicles, resulting in the disastrous SLRV design by Boeing Vertol with bodies from Japan. Düwag modified the 601 design to develop the U2 LRT car for Frankfurt, and it was subsequently modified for Edmonton, Calgary and San Diego. When Edmonton’s LRT line was being designed, ETS’ Robert Clark, having established a connection with the Düwag management, suggested a tour of North American cities with 601, but Düwag’s General Manager replied to the effect that Düwag built the best streetcars in the world and needed no such demonstration. About that time, Siemens decided to diversify its medical operation in Canada and brought along Düwag, going from a sub-contractor to prime, with the Edmonton order being key.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]