BATTLEFIELD UPDATE Newsletter of the American Battlefield Protection Program Fall 2002, No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BATTLEFIELD UPDATE Newsletter of the American Battlefield Protection Program Fall 2002, No BATTLEFIELD UPDATE Newsletter of the American Battlefield Protection Program Fall 2002, No. 80 A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP STORY ALBANY CONFERENCE HELD By Frances H. Kennedy The American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) and the Civil War Preservation Trust (CWPT) proudly hosted A partnership created by The Conservation Fund, including the 6th National Conference on Battlefield Preservation in the National Park Service, the State of Georgia Community Albany, New York on August 16-18 2002. The meeting Greenspace Program, The Gilder Foundation. The Turner brought together battlefield preservationists and interested Foundation. Whitfield County, the City of Dalton. the citizens to meet, discuss and learn about a variety of bat­ Dalton/Whitfield Chamber of Commerce, the Community tlefield preservation issues. Foundation of Northwest Georgia, and the landowners - the Looper family and Rex Investments - represented by Those participants who arrived early to the conference Harry Looper, protected 625 acres on the Rocky Face were treated to a choice of battlefield tours or a grant work­ Ridge battlefield, site of the First battle of the Atlanta shop. Eric Schnizter conducted a tour of Saratoga National Campaign. Whitfield County now owns the land. Mike Historic Park. Dr. David Starbuck led a tour of the Lake Babb. the Chairman of the Whitfield County Board of George Battlefield area and the surrounding areas of Commissioners, said that the county plans minor enhance­ engagements. The ABPP staff presented a workshop on the ments of the land to tell the story of the battle and to pre­ ABPP grant process, applications, grant administration and serve the Confederate fortifications and will keep it unde­ various examples of battlefield research and preservation veloped to protect the natural resources. The Conservation planning projects funded by the grant program. A limited Fund's Civil War Battlefield Campaign. Frances H. number of conference binders, with the presentation and Kennedy. Director, began developing the partnership sev­ workshop handout materials included, are available on eral years ago, and grants from The Gilder Foundation and request from the ABPP staff. The Turner Foundation supported the Fund's work. The opening conference ceremony was held in the "War See PARTNERSHIP STORY, page 10 Room" in the Governor's Reception Hall of the State Capital. Honors to nation were rendered as the colors were presented by members of the 27th Infantry Brigade. New York Army National Guard, and opening remarks were offered by Col. David Sheppard. Chief of Staff New York National Guard, Division of Military & Naval Affairs. Authentic 18th century music provided the atmosphere, as conference participants and their guests were treated to evening tours of the State House, and viewed exhibits from the New York military collection. Two tracks of conference sessions were presented all day on Saturday. Topics varied from preservation planning, New York State projects, archeological investigations, landscape challenges and partnership building. All confer­ ence attendees enjoyed the Roundtable Luncheon that arranged tables by preservation topic to foster continued discussion on preservation issues. The day was capped off Rocky Face Ridge Battlefield. NPS photo. See Albany Conference, page 6 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Heritage Preservation Services CAPITAL WATCH, THE 107™ CONGRESS A number of bills concerning battlefield preservation markedly increased commercial development in recent were introduced in the 107th Congress. In addition to years. Such development not only threatens to intrude the Civil War Preservation Act. which authorized con­ on the experience of visitors, but in many instances tinuation of the battlefield acquisition grant program, has actually taken place directly on sites of historical other legislation was introduced that affects individual importance, irrevocably altering physical features of battlefields or military historic sites. At the time of the landscape that are crucial for understanding what this writing, the status of the various pieces of legisla­ took place at the Battle of the Little Bighorn. tion is as follows: Cedar Creek Battlefield and Belle Grove Plantation National Historical Park Act: Introduced in the House on June 13, 2002 by Frank Wolf (R-VA) and Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). H.R. 4944. which will designate the Cedar Creek Battlefield and Belle Grove Plantation National Historical Park as a unit of the National Park System, passed the House of Representatives October 1, 2002. The Senate version, S. 2623, was introduced on June 13, 2002, by John Warner (R-VA) and George Allen (R-VA) and passed on November 20. It is now awaiting the President's signature. The Battle of Cedar Creek, also known as the battle of Belle Grove, was a major event of the An example of commercial development adjacent to Little Civil War and represented the end of the Shenandoah Bighorn Battlefield. NFS photo. Valley campaign of 1864. Conveyance Authorization for a Portion of the Fort Donelson National Battlefield Expansion Act Bluegrass Army Depot: Introduced by Jim Bunning of 2002: Introduced in the House on September 19, (R-KY) on October 10, 2002, S. 3108 authorizes the 2002 by Ed Whitfield (R-KY) and John Tanner (D- conveyance of a portion of the Bluegrass Army Depot TN), H.R. 5426 will expand the boundaries of the Fort to Madison County. Kentucky to preserve a historic Donelson National Battlefield to authorize the acqui­ Civil War battlefield. The Secretary of the Army will sition and interpretation of lands associated with the be authorized to effect the transfer only if the County campaign that resulted in the capture of the fort in agrees to utilize the property for historical preserva­ 1862. The bill has been referred to the Committee on tion and education purposes. The bill has been read Resources. twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument Services. Enhancement Act of 2001: Introduced in the Senate Fort Presque Isle National Historic Site Act: by Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-CO) on August 2, Introduced by Phil English (R-PA) on May 8. 2002, 2001, S. 1338 will expand the boundaries of Little HR 4681 will establish the Fort Presque Isle National Bighorn Battlefield. The bill has been read twice and Historic Site in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural The bill has been referred to the Committee on Resources. The current total size of the Monument is Resources. Fort Presque Isle was a frontier outpost 765.34 acres. This includes the areas immediately sur­ located on Garrison Hill in the area of present-day rounding the cemetery and a separate area, the Reno- Erie, Pennsylvania, which was the site of the Benteen Battlefield, a few miles from the cemetery. American installations built in 1795 and 1796 and in There are additional sites of historical interest related the War of 1812. The Pennsylvania Historical and to the 1876 battle that are not contained within the Museum Commission has recognized the reconstruct­ boundaries of the Monument as it is presently consti­ ed blockhouse as eligible for placement on the tuted. The area surrounding the Monument has seen National Register of Historic Places. 2 Battlefield Update LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND GRANT UPDATE Thanks in part to the lobbying efforts of a number of obligating $1,856,570, of which $420,000 has been paid as preservation groups, led by the Civil War Preservation of this writing, to acquire 659.5 acres of battlefield land. Trust (CWPT), the 107th Congress appropriated funds to Some of the recipients are: assist States and local communities acquire and preserve Arkansas State Parks: $421,000 for 70 acres at Prairie threatened Civil War battlefields. The FY 2002 Grove. Department of the Interior Appropriations Act (Public Law Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation: 107-63) authorized $11 million of the Land and Water $47,000 for 6.5 acres at Chancellorsville; and $68,500 Conservation Fund (LWCF) for use in matching grants to for 43 acres at Reams Station. permanently protect endangered battle sites. The LWCF Frederick County. Virginia: $420,000 for 108 acres at grants may be awarded to units of State and local govern­ Kernstown. ments, or private non-profit organizations in partnership Maryland Program Open Space: $360,000 for 200 acres at with a State of local government, to acquire battlefield land Antietam. for its preservation. The ABPP has recommended four more grants, totaling LWCF grants are awarded through a competitive process $576,050 to acquire an additional 196 acres at four battle­ over three years (fiscal years 2002 through 2004). Each fields. These are pending the approval of the National Park grant requires a dollar-for-dollar non-Federal match by the Service Director. The ABPP will announce the recipients recipient. The grants are available for the fee simple acqui­ of additional awards once the Director has signed the nee sition of, or for the acquisition of permanent, protective essary authorization. Three more applications are current­ interests in, land at Civil War battlefields listed in the Civil ly waiting review. If all are approved, $1,953,250 will War Sites Advisory Commission's (CWSAC) 1993 Report acquire another 945 acres of endangered battlefield land. on the Nation's Civil War Battlefields. Higher considera­ tion will be given to proposals for acquisition of endan­ Applicants may submit proposals to the ABPP at any time. gered lands at battlefields defined as Priority I or II sites in The ABPP will review applications for Priority I and II bat­ the CWSAC report. Funds, however, may not be used to tlefields as they are received. The ABPP will notify the acquire land or interests in land within the legislative applicant of its decision within 30 days of receipt of the boundary of a National Park. completed application. Applications for Priority III and IV battlefields will be reviewed every four months beginning The ABPP evaluates the proposals it receives based on on June 1.
Recommended publications
  • CWSAC Report Update
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky Washington, DC October 2008 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC October 2008 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett, Reporting; Lisa Rupple and Shannon Davis, Preservation Specialists; Matthew Borders, Historian; Renee S. Novak and Gweneth Langdon, Interns. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Joseph E. Brent, Mudpuppy and Waterdog, Inc. Respondents Betty Cole, Barbourville Tourist and Recreation Commission; James Cass, Camp Wildcat Preservation Foundation; Tres Seymour, Battle for the Bridge Historic Preserve/Hart County Historical Society; Frank Fitzpatrick, Middle Creek National Battlefield Foundation, Inc.; Rob Rumpke, Battle of Richmond Association; Joan House, Kentucky Department of Parks; and William A. Penn. Cover: The Louisville-Nashville Railroad Bridge over the Green River, Munfordville, Kentucky. The stone piers are original to the 1850s. The battles of Munfordville and Rowlett’s Station were waged for control of the bridge and the railroad. Photograph by Joseph Brent. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil War
    American Civil War Major Battles & Minor Engagements 1861-1865 1861 ........ p. 2 1862 ........ p. 4 1863 ........ p. 9 1864 ........ p. 13 1865 ........ p. 19 CIVIL WAR IMPRESSIONIST ASSOCIATION 1 Civil War Battles: 1861 Eastern Theater April 12 - Battle of Fort Sumter (& Fort Moultie), Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. The bombardment/siege and ultimate surrender of Fort Sumter by Brig. General P.G.T. Beauregard was the official start of the Civil War. https://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm June 3 - Battle of Philippi, (West) Virginia A skirmish involving over 3,000 soldiers, Philippi was the first battle of the American Civil War. June 10 - Big Bethel, Virginia The skirmish of Big Bethel was the first land battle of the civil war and was a portent of the carnage that was to come. July 11 - Rich Mountain, (West) Virginia July 21 - First Battle of Bull Run, Manassas, Virginia Also known as First Manassas, the first major engagement of the American Civil War was a shocking rout of Union soldiers by confederates at Manassas Junction, VA. August 28-29 - Hatteras Inlet, North Carolina September 10 - Carnifax Ferry, (West) Virginia September 12-15 - Cheat Mountain, (West) Virginia October 3 - Greenbrier River, (West) Virginia October 21 - Ball's Bluff, Virginia October 9 - Battle of Santa Rosa Island, Santa Rosa Island (Florida) The Battle of Santa Rosa Island was a failed attempt by Confederate forces to take the Union-held Fort Pickens. November 7-8 - Battle of Port Royal Sound, Port Royal Sound, South Carolina The battle of Port Royal was one of the earliest amphibious operations of the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History 8-2015 Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter ( Aug. 2015) Manuscripts & Folklife Archives Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Folklife Archives, Manuscripts &, "Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter ( Aug. 2015)" (2015). Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter. Paper 17. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war/17 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Founded March 2011 – Bowling Green, Kentucky President –Tom Carr; Vice President - Jonathan Jeffrey; Secretary – Carol Crowe-Carraco; Treasurer – Robert Dietle; Advisors – Glenn LaFantasie and - Greg Biggs (Program Chair and President-Clarksville CWRT) The Bowling Green, KY Civil War Round Table meets on the 3rd Thursday of each month (except June, July, and December). Email: [email protected] We meet at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 20 in Cherry Hall 125 on the Campus of Western Kentucky University. Our meeting are always open to the public. Members please bring a friend or two – new recruits are always welcome. Our Program for August 2015: Greg Bayne “Why Didn’t Europe Intervene?” The Bowling Green Civil War Roundtable is proud to have Mr. Greg Bayne as our guest speaker this month. Greg will be discussing one of the most interesting and little understood topics related to the Civil War: why Europe chose not to intervene.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Richmond Historic Areas Other Names/Site Number Ma-90, Ma-9 I, Ma-92, Ma-93
    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department National Park Service National Register Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual pjnnirtiiii ni IIIHin 11 See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name Battle of Richmond Historic Areas other names/site number Ma-90, Ma-9 I, Ma-92, Ma-93 2. Location street & number see continuation sheet i LaJ not for publication city, town see continuation sheet vl vicinity state Kentucky code KY county Madison code I5i zip code 40475 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property Cxl private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I"x1 district 4 16 buildings I I public-State I I site ____ ____ sites I~x1 public-Federal I I structure ____ ____ structures I I object ____ ____ objects 4 16 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously na _____ ____ listed in the National Register ) 2______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this LXJ nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky and Kentuckians in the American Civil War: Nonfiction Materials Available at Madison County Public Library, Plus Selected Websites
    Kentucky and Kentuckians in the American Civil War: Nonfiction Materials Available at Madison County Public Library, Plus Selected Websites Voices From the Century Before: The Odyssey of a Nineteenth Century Kentucky Family (K/973.7/Ber in Richmond and Berea) by Mary Clay Berry. “A remarkable family album unfolding as a personal drama of slavery, Civil War and the turmoil of Reconstruction, these letters were written between 1843 and 1867 by men who fought, variously, for both the Union and the Confederacy. Her great-grandfather Brutus Clay, one of Kentucky's major slave owners, was a staunchly conservative yet pro-Union, border-state congressman whose anti-abolitionist stance was diametrically opposite that of his brother Cassius Clay, outspoken opponent of slavery and emancipationist newspaper publisher...The chatty letters, skillfully linked by Berry's commentary, yield an unvarnished account of the brutal realities of slavery, and are a window on Lincoln's election and the war's outbreak and bloody course…” (--Publishers Weekly) The Battle of Perryville, 1862: Culmination of the Failed Kentucky Campaign (K/973.7/Bro in Richmond) by Robert P. Broadwater. “In 1862, the South launched a campaign to bring the indecisive border state of Kentucky into the Confederacy. Full of blunders and missed opportunities, the campaign convinced the Kentuckians that the Confederacy was incapable of holding the state against determined Union forces. Among the disasters was the bloody battle of Perryville. Drawing on research in letters, diaries and regimental histories, this book tells the story of the South's ill-fated effort.” (--from the publisher) Glory at a Gallop: Tales of the Confederate Cavalry (973.7/Bro in Berea) by William R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 1
    The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 1 The This publication pertaining to Paper the Civil War in Kentucky is a special edition spanning the Trail four years of the Civil War 1861-1865. Almost every entry Of the in this publication is refer- enced to the specific item it was Civil War obtained from. In Kentucky It will be incorporated into the “work in progress” book enti- 1861-1865 tled, “The Paper Trail of the Ken- tucky National Guard” that will be published in 2002. The finished book will be a compilation of the military his- tory of each of the 120 counties Compiled by Colonel (Ret.) Ar- of the Commonwealth. mando “Al” Alfaro The over 720 pages will be an excellent reference book on Kentucky’s military history from the War of 1812 to the Al Alfaro 651 Raven Drive present day Army and Air Frankfort, KY 40601 Kentucky National Guard. 502 223-8318 [email protected] The Paper Trail of the Civil War in Kentucky 1861-1865 2 Index Pg Index Pg Civil War Casualties 3 Henderson 36 22 Courthouses Burned 3 Henry – Hickman 37 Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address 3 Hopkins – Jackson – Jefferson 38 Civil War Unit Organizations 3 Jessamine 41 Civil War Skirmishes 3 Johnson 42 Riders Horse Hoof Determines Death 3 Kenton 43 Kentucky Confederate Units 3 Knott – Knox 44 Kentucky Union Units 4 Larue – Laurel 45 Kentucky US Colored Troop Units 5 Lawrence – Lee – Leslie – Letcher - Lewis 46 Taps 5 Lincoln – Livingston - Madison 47 Civil War Campaign Streamers 6 Logan – Lyon - Madison 48 Seven Civil War Soldiers Become 6 Magoffin 49 Presidents Marion
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Manuscripts
    CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS MANUSCRIPT READING ROW '•'" -"•••-' -'- J+l. MANUSCRIPT READING ROOM CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS A Guide to Collections in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress Compiled by John R. Sellers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON 1986 Cover: Ulysses S. Grant Title page: Benjamin F. Butler, Montgomery C. Meigs, Joseph Hooker, and David D. Porter Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Civil War manuscripts. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: LC 42:C49 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865— Manuscripts—Catalogs. 2. United States—History— Civil War, 1861-1865—Sources—Bibliography—Catalogs. 3. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division—Catalogs. I. Sellers, John R. II. Title. Z1242.L48 1986 [E468] 016.9737 81-607105 ISBN 0-8444-0381-4 The portraits in this guide were reproduced from a photograph album in the James Wadsworth family papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. The album contains nearly 200 original photographs (numbered sequentially at the top), most of which were autographed by their subjects. The photo- graphs were collected by John Hay, an author and statesman who was Lin- coln's private secretary from 1860 to 1865. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. PREFACE To Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War was essentially a people's contest over the maintenance of a government dedi- cated to the elevation of man and the right of every citizen to an unfettered start in the race of life. President Lincoln believed that most Americans understood this, for he liked to boast that while large numbers of Army and Navy officers had resigned their commissions to take up arms against the government, not one common soldier or sailor was known to have deserted his post to fight for the Confederacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kentucky Campaign, the Battle of Antietam, and the War in Virginia and the West,1862-1863 the Strategic Situation of the South in 1862
    The Kentucky Campaign, The Battle of Antietam, and the War in Virginia and the West,1862-1863 The strategic situation of the South in 1862 The Confederate states recognized from the outset of the Civil War that they had disadvantages in terms of population and industrial output. Their strategy was to take advantage of their compact geography, with internal lines of communication, their military heritage (Southerners had been disproportionately the officers of the United States Army), and their greater enthusiasm for their cause to wear down the Union will to wage war. They also believed the Britain, with its heavy dependence on Southern cotton to supply its mills, would be at worst neutral with a bias in their favor, and they dreamed of direct European assistance.Their specific strategies included privateering in the Atlantic to harass New England merchants with ships like the Alabama and putting pressure on Washington DC, whose city limits fronted on the Confederate state of Virginia. The South believed that since they did not intend to occupy and hold Northern territory, they would be fighting principally in defense of their homeland and their soldiers would consequently have greater morale and stronger commitment to the cause. In the end, the Southern strategy was to want to win more than the Union did, and this proved to be an illusion. In the end, the Southern strategy was to want to win more than the Union did, and this proved to be an illusion. The Kentucky Campaign of 1862 ( Battle of Perryville, or Confederate Heartland Offensive) Lasted from June - October 8, 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peter, Frances. a Union Woman in Civil War Kentucky: the Diary of Frances Peter. Edited by John David Smith and William
    Peter, Frances. A Union Woman in Civil War Kentucky: The Diary of Frances Peter. Edited by John David Smith and William Cooper Jr. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2000. Lexington, Kentucky Arrest of a secessionist, 3-4 Arrest of a Confederate spy, 4 Union victory at Mill Springs, Zollicoffer death, 5-6 Women, hospitals, 7 Soldiers’ Aid Society concert, 7 Secession flag hoisted at Transylvania, Morgan’s house, 8-9 Union forces take Nashville, 10 Funeral of Confederate soldier, Fort Donelson, 11-12 Arrest of one of Morgan’s men, 12 Man arrest for carrying Confederate mail, 12 Flag presented to 33rd Indiana, 14 Shiloh, hospital, soldiers, 14-15 Souvenirs from Shiloh, 15 Drunken soldier shot by a Confederate, 16 Women gave soldiers in hospital a dinner, 16 Concert for Soldiers’ Aid Society, controversy over soldier singing, 16-17 Union soldier shot by a freight agent, 20 John Hunt Morgan’s cavalry, 20 et passim Stricter martial law, Mrs. Morgan sent out of town, 21-22 Skirmish with Confederates, 22 Measles, 23 Defense of the city, 25 Men evading service arrested in Covington, 26 Drilling, 26 Rebels tearing up railroad, guerrillas, 27 General Nelson, 28 John Hunt Morgan, Confederate women, Morgan’s men come into Lexington, rough and dirty men, Bragg, 30-39 Mill, Kirby Smith, 40 Discussion with Confederate soldier, 41 Large fire in Lexington, 42 Partisan Rangers, 45 Kirby Smith, Confederate women, 46 Men leading riderless horses through Lexington so people will exaggerate their numbers, 47 Confederates plan to take Frankfort and take
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling Civil War Kentuck
    VOL. LI, NO. 1 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 January 2011 Welcome back to all our members and friends as we begin our 51st year of existence! * * * * * The border state of Kentucky was strongly nationalistic but economically pro-South. For a generation prior to the Civil War, Kentucky had straddled the borderline of conflict with its statesmen working for compromise. With the coming of war, its governor, Beriah Magoffin, refused to honor President Lincoln's call for troops, and the state legislature, on May 20, 1861, resolved to remain neutral. At the war's beginning both Union and Confederacy seemed intent on honoring Kentucky's pledge of neutrality. However, the Blue Grass State's precarious neutrality could not last as troops from both sides infiltrated the state quickly. Lincoln's difficulties with his own state persisted throughout the war. At one point Lincoln requested Maj. Gen. John Fremont to "modify" his proclamation which ordained freedom for slaves of rebellious owners, threatened the death penalty for certain secessionists and confiscated their property. Lincoln felt that the proclamation "will alarm our Southern Union friends, and turn them against us-perhaps ruin our rather fair prospect for Kentucky." Later in the war when the Confederate cavalry of John Hunt Morgan was raiding the state with impunity, an exasperated Lincoln wired Henry Halleck, the ranking Federal commander in the department: "They are having a stampede in Kentucky. Please look to it." Kentucky soldiers in the Confederate army held a convention at Russellville in November of 1861, and adopted an ordinance of secession.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemuel H. Hazzard Papers Msshazzard
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8p84k6q No online items Lemuel H. Hazzard Papers mssHazzard Gayle Richardson The Huntington Library December 2020 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Lemuel H. Hazzard Papers mssHazzard 1 mssHazzard Contributing Institution: The Huntington Library Title: Lemuel H. Hazzard papers Creator: Hazzard, Lemuel H., 1843-1904 Identifier/Call Number: mssHazzard Physical Description: 1 Linear Feet(1 box) Date (inclusive): 1862-1919 Date (bulk): 1862-1873 Abstract: A collection of personal and military material for Lemuel H. Hazzard, American Civil War Captain, carpenter, and railway postal clerk. Language of Material: Materials are in English. Conditions Governing Access Open for use by qualified researchers and by appointment. Please contact Reader Services at the Huntington Library for more information. Conditions Governing Use The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher. Preferred Citation [Identification of item]. Lemuel H. Hazzard papers, The Huntington Library, San Marino, California. Immediate Source of Acquisition Purchased from T. L. Hazzard, May, 1952. Biographical / Historical Lemuel H. Hazzard (1843-1904) was a Sergeant, 1st Lieutenant, and then Captain of Co. I of the 12th Regiment of Indiana Infantry. The 12th was organized at Indianapolis in August 1862, and immediately left the state for Kentucky. The men took part in the disastrous battle of Richmond, Kentucky, when the green troops were routed by a much more experienced Confederate force under the command of Edmund Kirby Smith; the entire regiment was captured.
    [Show full text]
  • Malvern Hill Battlefield, Richmond Battlefield Park, Virginia
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2017 Malvern Hill Battlefield Richmond National Battlefield Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Malvern Hill Battlefield Richmond National Battlefield Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national
    [Show full text]