DOCSLIB.ORG

The Kentucky Campaign and the Battle of Antietam-2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Kentucky Campaign and the Battle of Antietam-2 Melanie Cartron IB History of the Americas Period 1 The Civil War 1862 By 1862, the success of the Confederate army was declining. The Union was thriving after victories at Fort Donelson and Fort Henry and had gained control of several key points of power, including New Orleans and much of West Tennessee. The Confederacy was looking for a way to improve their standings in the war, especially in the Western Theatre. General Braxton Bragg Born on March 22, 1817 in Warrenton, North Carolina Graduated from West Point in 1837 where frontal assaults were the most popular war tactic Served in the Seminole and Mexican Wars Characterized as temperamental and rash Relationship With Jefferson Davis During the Mexican War, Braxton Bragg helped the regiment of Jefferson Davis to hold off an army of Mexicans. Both men admired and respected each other greatly, which would lead Davis to favor and prioritize Bragg in several key and critical decisions. The Confederate Heartland Offensive In June 1862, Jefferson Davis appointed Braxton Bragg as General of the Army of Mississippi, hoping he would gain the much needed success for the Confederacy. Bragg plotted to invade Kentucky, hoping to gain support and troops as well as shift the focus of the war. Main goal was to make Kentucky part of the Confederacy Kentucky as a Border State At the beginning of the war, Kentucky remained neutral Was a slavery state, but did not secede While the Kentucky government would eventually become Unionist, Kentucky’s potential to becoming supportive of the Confederacy sparked interest Bragg’s Invasion of Kentucky In August of 1862, Bragg began his invasion of Kentucky He left Mississippi with 34,000 men and hoped to join forces with Lieutenant General Edmund Kirby Smith's 18,000 soldiers once in Kentucky. Battle of Richmond August 29 & 30, 1862 E. Kirby Smith’s 18,000 men left Knoxville, Tennessee on the road to Richmond, Kentucky Brig. Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne led advance of Rebel cavalry The cavalry encountered an advance of Union troopers and began fighting Union artillery and cavalry arrived and forced back Confederate cavalry Brig. Gen. Mahlon D. Manson, Union commander, ordered a brigade to march towards the Confederates the following day E. Kirby Smith ordered Cleburne to attack in the morning, promising that reinforcements were on the way Fighting started up once more on the morning of August, 30 with Cleburne’s attack Reinforcements joined both sides and the Confederates were able to force the Union army back Confederates were victorious Overview of the Battle of Richmond Union Confederacy Casualties: 4,900 Casualties: 750 4,000 Union soldiers Victorious were captured Victory opened up path to northern Kentucky Battle of Munfordville September 14-17, 1862 Munfordville had a key railroad station on the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Colonel John T. Wilder commanded Union forces at Munfordville Upon arriving at Munfordville, Confederate Brigadier General James R. Chalmers demanded that Wilder surrender Wilder refused to surrender and repulsed Union forces and sieges for several days On September 16th, realizing that Union reinforcements would soon arrive, the Confederates once again demanded surrender Union commander Wilder inspected enemy lines under a flag of truce and ultimately decided to surrender Overview of the Battle of Munfordville Union Confederacy Casualties: 4,148 Casualties: 714 The loss at Victorious Munfordville restricted Allowed Confederates the Union’s ability to to take temporary transport supplies due control of Kentucky to the loss of the and cut off Union railroad station supplies Inauguration of Confederate Governor Early in Bragg’s campaign, the Unionist Governor of Kentucky fled Bragg saw an opportunity to begin officially making Kentucky part of the Confederacy Confederate Provisional Governor Richard Hawes was inaugurated in Frankfort, Kentucky on October 4, 1862 Bragg left his troops with Maj. Gen. Leonidas Polk in order for him to attend the inauguration Bragg was unaware of a force of over 50,000 men led by Maj. Gen. Don Carlos Buell was formulating and heading towards his men Battle of Perryville October 8, 1862 Union forces under Buell caught up with Bragg’s army that was under command of Polk due to Bragg’s absence Polk did not attack Bragg arrived the following morning and demanded an immediate attack on Buell’s forces Initially, Bragg’s frontal assault seemed to work, however Buell led two brigades to fight back the Confederates Bragg retreated, realizing he was too short on supplies and men to win the battle Overview of the Battle of Perryville Union Confederacy Forces Engaged: 20,000 Forces Engaged: 16,000 Casualties: 4,220 Casualties: 3,401 Victory gave the Union Ended the Kentucky full control of Kentucky Campaign End of Kentucky Campaign After defeat at Perryville, Bragg decided to retreat and end the campaign The troops and support that Bragg had counted upon never materialized Bragg was questioned regarding the failure of the Kentucky Campaign Many believed Bragg was unfit to carry on commanding such large masses of Confederate troops Jefferson Davis dismissed theses concerns and continued to give Bragg large control over Confederate forces Union Strategy: Fall 1862 President Lincoln was looking to issue the Emancipation proclamation, however he wanted to issue it only after a Union victory to ensure that it did not seem to be an act of desperation With Bragg’s pending success in Kentucky, a large victory was needed for the Union Battle of Antietam September 16-18, 1862 First battle in Eastern Front of Civil War; fought in Sharpsburg, Maryland Bloodiest Battle of the Civil War Union forces under Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan clashed with Confederate forces under Robert E. Lee Battle was characterized by repeated, back-and-forth attacks between the Union and Confederate troops Lee’s forces were outnumbered, however Lee committed fully to engaging in the Battle On the last night of the battle, both forces tended to their wounded and Lee began to withdraw his injured troops The Fighting continued on September 18th, however McClellan did not pursue Lee’s withdrawing army Battle was imconclusive Overview of the Battle of Antietam Union Confederacy Forces Engaged: 87,000 Forces Engaged: 45,000 Casualties: 12,401 Casualties: 10,316 Union Declared “Victorious” While there was no real winner at the Battle of Antietam, Lincoln knew that a proclaimed Union victory would draw away the potential aid of Europe to the Confederacy. Lincoln also knew that a “victory” would finally allow him to declare the Emancipation Proclamation. The Issuing of the Emancipation Proclamation http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil- war/battle-of-antietam/videos/gilder-lehrman-the- emancipation-proclamation Bibliography http://americancivilwar.com/statepic/ky/ky008.html http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/perryville/perryville-history- articles/general-braggs-impossible.html?referrer=https:// www.google.com/ http://www.ohiocivilwarcentral.com/entry.php?rec=183 http://www.onthisveryspot.com/find/intro_printable.php? ent_web_name=Confederate_Heartland_Offensive http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/biographies/braxton- bragg.html http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/battle-of-perryville http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/antietam.html?tab=facts http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/munfordville.html? referrer=https://www.google.com/ http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/richmond.html http://www.battleofrichmond.org/ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CWSAC Report Update
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky Washington, DC October 2008 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC October 2008 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett, Reporting; Lisa Rupple and Shannon Davis, Preservation Specialists; Matthew Borders, Historian; Renee S. Novak and Gweneth Langdon, Interns. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Joseph E. Brent, Mudpuppy and Waterdog, Inc. Respondents Betty Cole, Barbourville Tourist and Recreation Commission; James Cass, Camp Wildcat Preservation Foundation; Tres Seymour, Battle for the Bridge Historic Preserve/Hart County Historical Society; Frank Fitzpatrick, Middle Creek National Battlefield Foundation, Inc.; Rob Rumpke, Battle of Richmond Association; Joan House, Kentucky Department of Parks; and William A. Penn. Cover: The Louisville-Nashville Railroad Bridge over the Green River, Munfordville, Kentucky. The stone piers are original to the 1850s. The battles of Munfordville and Rowlett’s Station were waged for control of the bridge and the railroad. Photograph by Joseph Brent. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chickamauga the Battle
    Chickamauga the Battle, Text and Photographs By Dennis Steele Senior Staff Writer he Battle of Chickamauga flashed into a white-hot clash on September 19, 1863, following engagements in Teastern and central Tennessee and northern Mississippi that caused the withdrawal of the Confederate Army of Tennessee (renamed from the Army of Mississippi) under GEN Braxton Bragg to Chattanooga, Tenn. Bragg was forced to make a further withdrawal into northwest Georgia after the Union’s Army of the Cumberland, under MG William S. Rosecrans, crossed the Tennessee River below Chattanooga, flanking Bragg’s primary line of defense. Chattanooga was a strategic prize. Union forces needed it as a transportation hub and supply center for the planned campaign into Georgia. The South needed the North not to have it. At LaFayette, Ga., about 26 miles south of Chattanooga, Bragg received reinforcements. After preliminary fights to stop Rosecrans, he crossed Chickamauga Creek to check the Union advance. In two days of bloody fighting, Bragg gained a tactical victory over Rosecrans at Chickamauga, driving the Army of the Cumberland from the battlefield. The stage was set for Bragg to lose the strategic campaign for Chattanooga, however, as he failed to pursue the retreating Union force, allowing it to withdraw into Chattanooga behind a heroic rear-guard stand by a force assembled from the disarray by MG George H. Thomas. The Battle of Chickamauga is cited as the last major Southern victory of the Civil War in the Western Theater. It bled both armies. Although official records are sketchy in part, estimates put Northern casualties at around 16,200 and Southern casualties at around 18,000.
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil War
    American Civil War Major Battles & Minor Engagements 1861-1865 1861 ........ p. 2 1862 ........ p. 4 1863 ........ p. 9 1864 ........ p. 13 1865 ........ p. 19 CIVIL WAR IMPRESSIONIST ASSOCIATION 1 Civil War Battles: 1861 Eastern Theater April 12 - Battle of Fort Sumter (& Fort Moultie), Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. The bombardment/siege and ultimate surrender of Fort Sumter by Brig. General P.G.T. Beauregard was the official start of the Civil War. https://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm June 3 - Battle of Philippi, (West) Virginia A skirmish involving over 3,000 soldiers, Philippi was the first battle of the American Civil War. June 10 - Big Bethel, Virginia The skirmish of Big Bethel was the first land battle of the civil war and was a portent of the carnage that was to come. July 11 - Rich Mountain, (West) Virginia July 21 - First Battle of Bull Run, Manassas, Virginia Also known as First Manassas, the first major engagement of the American Civil War was a shocking rout of Union soldiers by confederates at Manassas Junction, VA. August 28-29 - Hatteras Inlet, North Carolina September 10 - Carnifax Ferry, (West) Virginia September 12-15 - Cheat Mountain, (West) Virginia October 3 - Greenbrier River, (West) Virginia October 21 - Ball's Bluff, Virginia October 9 - Battle of Santa Rosa Island, Santa Rosa Island (Florida) The Battle of Santa Rosa Island was a failed attempt by Confederate forces to take the Union-held Fort Pickens. November 7-8 - Battle of Port Royal Sound, Port Royal Sound, South Carolina The battle of Port Royal was one of the earliest amphibious operations of the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A
    VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A. Miller, ]r. '50A The contributions of Virginia Military Institute alumni in Confed­ dent. His class standing after a year-and-a-half at the Institute was erate service during the Civil War are well known. Over 92 percent a respectable eighteenth of twenty-five. Sharp, however, resigned of the almost two thousand who wore the cadet uniform also wore from the corps in June 1841, but the Institute's records do not Confederate gray. What is not commonly remembered is that show the reason. He married in early November 1842, and he and thirteen alumni served in the Union army and navy-and two his wife, Sarah Elizabeth (Rebeck), left Jonesville for Missouri in others, loyal to the Union, died in Confederate hands. Why these the following year. They settled at Danville, Montgomery County, men did not follow the overwhelming majority of their cadet where Sharp read for the law and set up his practice. He was comrades and classmates who chose to support the Common­ possibly postmaster in Danville, where he was considered an wealth and the South is not difficult to explain. Several of them important citizen. An active mason, he was the Danville delegate lived in the remote counties west of the Alleghenies where to the grand lodge in St. Louis. In 1859-1860 he represented his citizens had long felt estranged from the rest of the state. Citizens area of the state in the Missouri Senate. Sharp's political, frater­ of the west sought to dismember Virginia and establish their own nal, and professional prominence as well as his VMI military mountain state.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Perryville: History and Memory at a Civil War Battlefield”
    1 “Remembering Perryville: History and Memory at a Civil War Battlefield” Kenneth W. Noe, Dept. of History, Auburn University, Auburn AL 36830 Popular Culture Association and American Culture Association Conference, Apr. 14, 2001 While members of the general public regularly travel to Civil War battlefield parks in large numbers, they usually do not give much thought to the history of those pastoral facilities. With the notable exception of Gettysburg, the same can be said of most scholars. Yet the slow evolution of battlefields as state-owned parks can tell us much about the nation’s post-Civil War history and search for meaning. Battlefields became the focus of new battles over how the Civil War was to be remembered, who was to be included or excluded in establishing an orthodox memory, and who was to profit from their establishment. In the process, those who saw the land as something other than a historical tableau struggled to establish a different identity. That process continues today. The battlefield at Perryville, Kentucky, offers a lesser known example of the process. On October 8, 1862, Union and Confederate forces clashed just west of Perryville, a small market town located southwest of Lexington in the commonwealth’s central bluegrass. The climax of a hard, six- week campaign that shifted the focus of the western war from northern Mississippi hundreds of miles toward the Ohio River, the battle ended inconclusively. Although a tactical Confederate victory, Gen. Braxton Bragg abandoned the hard-won field overnight to his numerically stronger foe and commenced a retreat that eventually led back to Middle Tennessee’s Stones River at the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Civil Military Relations in Complex Conflicts: Success And
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL The Importance of Civil Military Relations in Complex Conflicts: Success and Failure in the Border States, Civil War Kentucky and Missouri, 1860-62. Being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of PhD, Department of Politics and International Studies In the University of Hull By Carl William Piper, BA (Lancs),MA June, 2011 Contents Introduction, p.1 Literary Review, p.60 The Border States in the Secession Crisis, p115 Case Study 1: Missouri April to September, 1861, p.160 Case Study 2: Kentucky April to September, 1861, p.212 Case Study 3: Forts Henry and Donelson, p.263 Case Study 4: The Perryville Campaign June to November, 1862, p.319 Conclusion, p.377 Bibliography, p.418 Introduction Despite taking place in the mid-nineteenth century the U.S. Civil War still offers numerous crucial insights into modern armed conflicts. A current or future federation or new ‘nation’ may face fundamental political differences, even irreconcilable difficulties, which can only be settled by force. In future states will inevitably face both separatist issues and polarised argument over the political development of their nation. It is probable that a civil war may again occur where the world may watch and consider forms of intervention, including military force, but be unwilling to do so decisively. This type of Civil War therefore remains historically significant, offering lessons for approaching the problems of strategy in a politically complex environment. Equally it offers insights into civil-military relations in highly complex conflicts where loyalties are not always clear. Success and ultimate triumph in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indiana 51St Infantry Regiment
    The Indiana 51st Infantry Regiment 1 51st Regiment Infantry Organized at Indianapolis, Ind., and mustered in December 14, 1861. Moved to Louisville, Ky., December 14; thence to Bardstown, Ky., and duty there until February, 1862. Attached to 20th Brigade, Army of the Ohio, to January, 1862. 20th Brigade, 6th Division, Army of the Ohio, to September, 1862. 20th Brigade, 6th Division, 2nd Army Corps, Army of the Ohio, to November, 1862. 3rd Brigade, 1st Division, Left Wing 14th Army Corps, Army of the Cumberland, to January, 1863. 3rd Brigade, 1st Division, 21st Army Corps, Army of the Cumberland, to April, 1863. Streight's Provisional Brigade, Army of the Cumberland, to May, 1863. Prisoners of war until December, 1863. Post of Chattanooga, Tenn., Dept. of the Cumberland, to April, 1864. 1st Separate Brigade, Chattanooga, Tenn., Dept. of the Cumberland, to September, 1864. 2nd Brigade, 2nd Division, 4th Army Corps, Army of the Cumberland, to November, 1864. 1st Brigade, 3rd Division, 4th Army Corps, to August, 1865. Dept. of Texas to December, 1865. Col. Abel Delos Streight, Commander of the 51st SERVICE.--March to Nashville, Tenn., February 7-March 13, 1862, and to Indiana Infantry Savannah, Tenn., March 29-April 6. Battle of Shiloh, Tenn., April 6-7. Advance on and siege of Corinth, Miss., April 29-May 30. Pursuit to Booneville May 31-June 12. Buell's Campaign in Northern Alabama and Middle Tennessee June to August. Guarding Memphis & Charleston Railroad. March to Louisville, Ky., in pursuit of Bragg August 21-September 26. Pursuit of Bragg to Loudon, Ky., October 1-22.
    [Show full text]
  • A State Divided: the Civil War in Kentucky Civil War in the Bluegrass
    $5 Fall 2013 KentuckyKentucky Humanities Council, Inc. humanities A State Divided: The Civil War in Kentucky Civil War in the Bluegrass e are 150 years removed from the Civil War, yet it still creates strong emotions in many Americans. The War Between the States split the nation deeply and divided Kentucky, pitting friend against friend, neighbor against neighbor, brother against brother, and even father against son. WKentucky’s future was forever changed by the events of the Civil War. In commemoration of the Civil War’s sesquicentennial, we are pleased to share with you a wide array of Kentucky perspectives and issues that developed throughout the war. What would Abraham Lincoln say about slavery and the Civil War if he were alive today? Stephen A. Brown conducts a “conversation” with President Lincoln through chronicled speeches and writings. His article is on page 7. Camp Nelson played a pivotal role in the destruction of slavery in the Commonwealth. W. Stephen McBride shares the history of Kentucky’s largest recruitment and training center for Ben Chandler African American soldiers and what remains of Camp Nelson today. Executive Director John Hunt Morgan is widely known for his Confederate Cavalry raids, overshadowing fellow Kentucky Humanities Council Kentuckian George Martin Jessee, known as “Naughty Jessee.” Mark V. Wetherington tells us about the lesser known Confederate Cavalryman on page 15. While Kentucky’s men were off fighting for both the Union and the Confederacy, their wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters were left to take care of the family and home. On page 18, Nancy Baird shares the stories of several Kentucky women who bravely kept the home fires burning during the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Stones River
    STONES RIVER NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD TENNESSEE Rosecrans Advances the southerly course of the stream. This On December 26, 1862, General Rosecrans movement, if successful, would place part of Stones River marched the Union army out of Nashville the Union army between the Confederates and advanced against Bragg's position. By and their supply base at Murfreesboro. NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD December 30, the Union troops faced the Striking first, the Confederates had the ad­ Confederates near Stones River. vantage. At daybreak on the 31st, they furi­ ously assaulted the Union right wing, driving But the advance had not been without it and part of the center back through the The first big battle in the Union campaign destined to end incident. Moving swiftly with cavalry, Brig. surrounding cedar woods to the Nashville in Sherman's "March to the Sea" Gen. Joseph Wheeler raided the Union army, Pike. Only inspired fighting by Brig. Gen. burning and destroying wagon trains and Philip H. Sheridan's right-wing brigade and harassing the rearguard. Starting on the stubborn holding of most of the center by night of December 29, he completely circled Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas averted a of all western Tennessee, as well as Nash­ the Union army, returning to the Confed­ Union rout. ville and part of middle Tennessee. How­ erate lines early on December 31. Wheeler ever, the invasion of Kentucky by Gen. had destroyed nearly a million dollars worth All thought of the Union attack against Braxton Bragg's Confederate army tempo­ of Federal property and had taken 700 Bragg's right wing was now dropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History 9-2016 Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter (Sept. 2016) Manuscripts & Folklife Archives Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Folklife Archives, Manuscripts &, "Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter (Sept. 2016)" (2016). Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter. Paper 10. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war/10 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Founded March 2011 – Bowling Green, Kentucky President –Tom Carr; Vice President - Jonathan Jeffrey; Secretary – Carol Crowe-Carraco; Treasurer – Robert Dietle; Advisors – Glenn LaFantasie and - Greg Biggs (Program Chair and President-Clarksville CWRT) The Bowling Green, KY Civil War Round Table meets on the 3rd Tuesday of each month (except June, July, and December). Email: [email protected] We meet at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 20th in Cherry Hall 125 on the Campus of Western Kentucky University. Our meetings are always open to the public. Members please bring a friend or two – new recruits are always welcome. Our Program for September 20th 2016: The Battle of Spotsylvania Court House Spotsylvania Court House – perhaps the most forgotten major battle of the Civil War. Over 150,000 soldiers struggled for 13-days along a six-mile front in central Virginia in May 1864, leaving over 30,000 casualties on the battleground of Spotsylvania Court House.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter History 8-2015 Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter ( Aug. 2015) Manuscripts & Folklife Archives Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Folklife Archives, Manuscripts &, "Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter ( Aug. 2015)" (2015). Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter. Paper 17. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/civil_war/17 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bowling Green Civil War Round Table Newsletter by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Founded March 2011 – Bowling Green, Kentucky President –Tom Carr; Vice President - Jonathan Jeffrey; Secretary – Carol Crowe-Carraco; Treasurer – Robert Dietle; Advisors – Glenn LaFantasie and - Greg Biggs (Program Chair and President-Clarksville CWRT) The Bowling Green, KY Civil War Round Table meets on the 3rd Thursday of each month (except June, July, and December). Email: [email protected] We meet at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 20 in Cherry Hall 125 on the Campus of Western Kentucky University. Our meeting are always open to the public. Members please bring a friend or two – new recruits are always welcome. Our Program for August 2015: Greg Bayne “Why Didn’t Europe Intervene?” The Bowling Green Civil War Roundtable is proud to have Mr. Greg Bayne as our guest speaker this month. Greg will be discussing one of the most interesting and little understood topics related to the Civil War: why Europe chose not to intervene.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Written in Letters of Blood: the Forgotten Legacy of the Army of the Cumberland”
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville The Research and Scholarship Symposium The 2016 yS mposium Apr 20th, 3:00 PM - 3:20 PM Not Written in Letters of Blood: The orF gotten Legacy of the Army of the Cumberland Andrew R. Perkins Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ research_scholarship_symposium Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Perkins, Andrew R., "Not Written in Letters of Blood: The orF gotten Legacy of the Army of the Cumberland" (2016). The Research and Scholarship Symposium. 5. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/research_scholarship_symposium/2016/podium_presentations/5 This Podium Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Research and Scholarship Symposium by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Drew Perkins 2 March 2016 “Not Written in Letters of Blood: The Forgotten Legacy of the Army of the Cumberland” There is a chapter missing in the annals of Civil War history. The story of an entire army, and the thousands of men that comprised it, is not being told. That army is the Army of the Cumberland, which teeters on the verge of being lost to history due to three main factors: poorly timed defeats and victories in battle, personal feuds and politicking between Union officers, and the undue emphasis of Civil War historians on Southern Romanticism. While the largest Union army of the war, the Army of the Potomac, has received dozens if not hundreds of publications written about it in the last few decades, the second largest army, the Army of the Cumberland, has garnered no such attention.
    [Show full text]