The Pride and Prejudice of the Western World: the Iconicity of the Great Books
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Syracuse University SURFACE Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics College of Arts and Sciences January 2010 The Pride and Prejudice of the Western World: The Iconicity of the Great Books Solibakke Ivan Karl Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/lll Part of the German Literature Commons Recommended Citation Karl, Solibakke Ivan, "The Pride and Prejudice of the Western World: The Iconicity of the Great Books" (2010). Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics. 11. https://surface.syr.edu/lll/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Postscripts 6.1–3 (2010) 261–275 Postscripts ISSN (print) 1743-887x doi: 10.1558/post.v6.1–3.261 Postscripts ISSN (online) 1743-8888 The Pride and Prejudice of the Western World: Canonic Memory, Great Books and Archive Fever KARL IVAN SOL I BA kk E SYRACU S E UNIVERsiTY [email protected] AB S TRACT This article examines controversies arising from the perception of the instru- ments of cultural memory and the logic of their transmissibility. On the one hand, we have a carefully selected, temporally and geographically orches- trated body of texts, the Great Books, which are an enduring testament to the authority of Western intellectual artifacts. On the other hand, Jacques Der- rida’s Archive Fever locates a furtive transformation of collective memory in the informal practices exemplified by oral narrative and public discourse. Not only do both models rely on archives as a functional instrument of col- lective identity, but they also value them as institutions circumscribing social and cultural conventions. However, when synchronizing the traces embedded in oral discourse and written documents, the repositories are fre- quently subject to manipulation by interpretive communities. Recognizing the processes underlying archives and artifacts is essential to comprehend- ing how canons and canonic practices impact Western cultural memory. Keywords Great Books Movement These books are the means of understanding our society and ourselves. They con- tain the great ideas that dominate us without our knowing it. There is no compa- rable repository of our tradition. Robert M. Hutchins, Great Books of the Western World © Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2012, Unit S3, Kelham House, 3 Lancaster Street, Sheffield S3 8AF 262 Karl Ivan Solibakke Theories of archives and textual repositories For the past 4,000 years, written archives have regulated the politics of cultural memory, since such repositories contain the textual capital to transmit collective wisdom and social norms from one generation to the next. Endowing cultural orders with common identities and mnemonic markers, a collection of texts also serves as the basis for tracing the proc- esses of cultural memory and conjecturing how mnemonics mold collec- tive desire. Because of their mobility, written artifacts are also the starting point for investigations into the transmissibility of collective meanings as signifiers that either work to consolidate the mnemonic objectives inscribed into the texts or induce transformations of cultural traditions. Specifically, commentary and exegesis substantiate the spatial and tem- poral dispersion of literate traditions, which, while they do not contest the difference between thought and language, words and things, verbal language and active response, they expose these as adaptable effects of historical approaches to collective knowledge. Although confidence in literate memory as a stabilizing agent seems justified, textual memory does not always keep up with the proliferation of media in the age of global communication. Rather, the mobility of tex- tual archives seems to be neutralized by the sheer velocity of new media, which infuses objects and events with a temporal immediacy belying the apposition of past and present. Because they demand instant disclosure, new media usurp the time lag attributed to written artifacts, given that these depend upon being deciphered and interpreted before their mean- ing becomes apparent and the remnants undertake an active role in defin- ing collective memory spaces. More specifically, if one focuses on texts that have the invariable attributes of canons, suggesting that the semiotic markers have been fixed in an immobile memory mode, these may still be intelligible, but they also become inaccessible to future signifiers. As iconic repositories, canonic archives encapsulate a discrete mnemonic practice that stimulates performative and ritualistic approaches to cul- tural memory. Accordingly, they are blind to the exigencies of the dis- semination process and the multiplicity of discourses in a global society undergoing perpetual transformations. In connection with the challenges of the post-war era, Robert M. Hutchins’ portrayal of the Great Conversation in the introductory volume of Encyclopedia Britannica’s Great Books of the Western World is emblematic of an iconic repository, since his encomium accentuates the importance of the canon of the Western World for intellectual paradigms based on © Equinox Publishing Ltd 2012 The Pride and Prejudice of the Western World 263 European traditions. Although the famous educator appeals to the need for dialogue, his plea is couched in logocentric and moral terms, accen- tuating an ideology that lionizes Western heritage and dissociates itself from non-Western cultural traditions. The tradition of the West is embodied in the Great Conversation that began in the dawn of history and that continues to the present day. Whatever the merits of other civilizations in other respects, no civilization is like that of the West in this respect. No other civilization can claim that its defining characteristic is a dialogue of this sort. No dialogue in any other civiliza- tion can compare with that of the West in the number of great works of the mind that have contributed to this dialogue. … The spirit of Western civilization is the spirit of inquiry. Its dominant element is the Logos. … The exchange of ideas is held to be the path to the realization of the poten- tialities of the race. (Hutchins 1952) The archive models discussed in the following essay (see also Larson in this volume) articulate controversies with regard to the perception of the instruments of cultural memory and the logic of their transmissibility. On the one hand, we have a carefully chosen, temporally and geographically orchestrated body of texts, the Great Books, an enduring testament to the legitimacy of Western cultural traditions. On the other hand, there is the clandestine, surreptitious transformation of collective memory that Jacques Derrida locates in the “archival problems of oral narrative and public property, of mnesic traces, of archaic and transgenerational her- itage, of everything that can happen to an ‘impression’ in these at once ‘topic’ and ‘genetic’ processes” (1996, 34). Not only do both models iden- tify archives as a functional part of collective traditions, but they also praise them as social institutions circumscribing socio-cultural conven- tions that can be manipulated by interpretive communities or modified by redefining the memory traces embedded in oral discourse and written documents. Even within this mnemonic context, though, dogged devotion to a finite collection of signifying artifacts ignores a primary disposition of textual storage spaces (Assmann 1987, 21): in contrast to theological or legal canons, intellectual texts represent a system of norms that facili- tate didactic and political objectives. According to the cultural memory experts, Jan and Aleida Assmann, the function of canonic texts is coupled with social integration, and anything that counteracts that objective must be regarded with suspicion. With this mediating quality of the canon in mind, the perseverance of the Great Books reveals itself as a transatlan- tic transfer that resists the porosity of transcultural currents in today’s global network. Provocations, such as the dissemination of new mean- © Equinox Publishing Ltd 2012 264 Karl Ivan Solibakke ings, the acceleration of transcultural exchange, and the reciprocity of regional epistemologies, do not take place. Perceived through the lense of Derrida’s Freudian approach to collective repositories in Archive Fever, misgivings arise as to the subconscious appropriation of a European intel- lectual tradition that guards against alien ideas and manipulates texts to comply with parochial or even liturgical doctrines of memory. St. John’s College: the Great Books program Triggered by a national crisis in the educational sector following the First World War as well as the economic crisis in Europe and the USA, several American universities investigated the viability of compiling a European archive and transforming it into a four-year undergraduate curriculum. Two reasons were cited as the driving force behind the project. The first reacted to a perceived intellectual corrosion instigated by the system of electives at American institutions of higher learning, which a canonic syllabus devoid of superfluous courses would offset with a comprehen- sive curriculur strategy. The second motivation was spurred by Fascism in Italy and Germany and the destructive impact that totalitarian orders had on the artifacts of Western civilization. The most promising projects were launched