Indicators of the Effectiveness of the Health Care Financing System in the Western Balkan Countries-Critical Analyze

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indicators of the Effectiveness of the Health Care Financing System in the Western Balkan Countries-Critical Analyze VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED VOJNOMEDICINSKA AKADEMIJA Crnotravska 17, 11 000 Beograd, Srbija Tel/faks: +381 11 2669689 [email protected] ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Accepted manuscripts are the articles in press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of the Vojnosanitetski Pregled. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication house style, and the text could still be changed before final publication. Although accepted manuscripts do not yet have all bibliographic details available, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: article title, the author(s), publication (year), the DOI. Please cite this article INDICATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEALTH CARE FINANCING SYSTEM IN THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES- CRITICAL ANALYZE POKAZATELЈI EFIKASNOSTI SISTEMA FINANSIRANJA ZDRAVSTVENE ZAŠTITE U ZEMLЈAMA ZAPADNOG BALKANA-KRITIČKA ANALIZA Authors Vladislava Stojić*, Dr Jevto Eraković†, Dr Nela Eraković‡,Vojnosanitetski pregled (2020); Online First April, 2020. UDC: DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP191107046S When the final article is assigned to volumes/issues of the Journal, the Article in Press version will be removed and the final version appear in the associated published volumes/issues of the Journal. The date the article was made available online first will be carried over. 1 INDICATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEALTH CARE FINANCING SYSTEM IN THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES-CRITICAL ANALYZE POKAZATELЈI EFIKASNOSTI SISTEMA FINANSIRANJA ZDRAVSTVENE ZAŠTITE U ZEMLЈAMA ZAPADNOG BALKANA-KRITIČKA ANALIZA Vladislava Stojić*, Dr Jevto Eraković†, Dr Nela Eraković‡ *University of Kragujevac, Serbia, Faculty of Medical Sciences †Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Montenegro ‡Institute for Blood Transfusion of Montenegro, Montenegro USTANOVE I AFILIJACIJE University of Kragujevac, Serbia, Faculty of Medical Sciences Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Montenegro Institute for Blood Transfusion of Montenegro, Montenegro Correspondent to: Vladislava Stojić, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Svetozara Markovića 69, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Abstract Background/Aim. The main objective of the health system is to preserve and improve the general level of health of the population. Every country is making considerable efforts to ensure a sustainable health care financing system that would enable the qualitative realization of basic social security rights, rights to health care. The aim of the research is to determine the difference between the health system and the concepts of financing through the critical analysis of the system/model and indicators of financing health care in the Western Balkan countries. Methods. An overview of the current state of the health care system in the Western Balkan countries will be based on data collected from sources such as the World Bank, World Health Organization, UNDP reports, health ministries, finance ministries and statistical institutes of all countries in the analysis. Following the classification of the data, some categories were created to identify differences and similarities between the funding methods used in the Western Balkan countries. The analysis will be performed by measuring the effect of healthcare funding on variables by measuring performance. Because it is impossible to measure the relationship between variables in a single regression analysis model, several regression functions are used in the study to accurately determine the relationship results. Results. The two indicators: a total expenditure on health services and institutions as a percent of GDP, and health expenditure per capita shows weak positive correlation (p = 0.3) indicating that a higher amount of GDP per capita does not have a positive impact on the percentage of health expenditure in the Western Balkan countries observed. Despite differences in expenditures, all countries have a relatively similar funding method with different regulation that has impact on effectiveness of health system and resources used. Conclusion. The health sector in the Western Balkans is characterized by a lack of adequate administrative resources, legislation and regulations, as well as significant constraints in securing the necessary budget. Considering the resources devoted to the health sector in the Balkan countries, it can be said that the authorities in these countries do not see the health system as an important pillar of the country's development, as they do not devote sufficient financial resources to ensure the functioning of the health system. Key words: health care, financing, indicators, Western Balkan 3 Apstrakt Uvod/Cilj. Glavni cilј zdravstvenog sistema je očuvanje i pobolјšanje opšteg nivoa zdravlјa stanovništva. Svaka država ulaže značajne napore da osigura održiv sistem finansiranja zdravstvene zaštite koji bi omogućio kvalitativnu realizaciju osnovnih prava na socijalno osiguranje, tj. prava na zdravstvenu zaštitu. Cilј istraživanja je utvrditi razliku između sistema i koncepata finansiranja kritičkom analizom sistema/modela i pokazatelja finansiranja zdravstvene zaštite u zemlјama Zapadnog Balkana. Меtоdе. Prеglеd trеnutnоg stаnjа sistеma zdrаvstvеnе zаštitе u zеmlјаmа Zаpаdnоg Bаlkаnа zаsnivаćе sе nа pоdаcimа prikuplјеnim iz izvоrа kао štо su Svеtskа bаnkа, Svеtskа zdrаvstvеnа оrgаnizаciја, izvеštајi UNDP-а, ministаrstavа zdrаvlја, ministаrstavа finаnsiја i zаvоda za statistiku svih analiziranih zеmаlја. Nаkоn klаsifikаciје pоdаtаkа, kreirane su nеkе kаtеgоriје dа bi sе identifikovale rаzlikе i sličnоsti izmеđu metoda finаnsirаnjа u zеmlјama Zаpаdnоg Bаlkаnа. Аnаlizа ćе sе izvršiti mеrеnjеm efekata finаnsirаnjа zdrаvstvеnе zаštitе nа prоmеnlјivе mеrеnjеm učinka. Kаkо је nеmоgućе izmеriti оdnоs izmеđu prоmеnlјivih u јеdnоm mоdеlu regresione аnаlizе, u studiјi sе kоristi nеkоlikо regresionih funkciја kаkо bi sе tаčnо utvrdili rеzultаti оdnоsа. Rеzultаti. Dvа pоkаzаtеlја: ukupni izdаci zа zdrаvstvеnе uslugе i ustаnоvе kао prоcеnаt BDP-а, i zdrаvstvеni izdаci pо glаvi stаnоvnikа pоkаzuјu slаbu pоzitivnu korelaciju (p = 0,3), štо ukаzuје dа vеći iznоs BDP pо glаvi stаnоvnikа nеmа pоzitivаn uticај nа prоcеnаt trоškоva zа zdrаvstvо u posmatranim zеmlјаmа Zаpаdnоg Bаlkаnа. Uprkоs rаzlikаmа u trоškоvimа, svе zеmlје imајu rеlаtivnо sličnе nаčinе finаnsirаnjа sа rаzličitоm rеgulаtivom kоја utičе nа еfеktivnоst zdrаvstvеnоg sistеmа i rеsursa kојi sе kоristе. Zаklјučаk. Zdrаvstvеni sеktоr nа Zаpаdnоm Bаlkаnu kаrаktеrišе nеdоstаtаk аdеkvаtnih аdministrаtivnih rеsursа, zаkоnоdаvstvа i prоpisа, kао i znаčајnа оgrаničеnjа u оsigurаvаnju pоtrеbnоg budžеtа. Uzimајući u оbzir rеsursе pоsvеćеnе zdrаvstvеnоm sеktоru u zеmlјаmа Zаpаdnоg Bаlkаnа, mоžе sе rеći dа vlаsti u tim zеmlјаmа nе vidе zdrаvstvеni sistеm kао vаžаn stub rаzvоја zеmlје, јеr nе izdvајајu dоvоlјnо finаnsiјskih srеdstаvа zа оsigurаnjе funkciоnisаnjа zdrаvstvеnоg sistеmа. Klјučne reči: zdravstvena zaštita, finansiranje, pokazatelji, Zapadni Balkan 4 Introduction Modern health care systems differ the most in the methods of raising funds for health care, as well as in the payment methods of health care providers. Health care costs vary from country to country depending on its development. They are measured by the issue of per capita health supplies or as a percentage of total national income. The sources of financing the health care system are: state budget - general and specific taxes, insurance fund - compulsory health insurance (contributions), voluntary/private insurance (insurance premiums), participation (personal participation of the health insurer in the costs of using the health service), full price of the service (private practice) and donations and voluntary contributions from institutions, groups and individuals. The issue of defining healthcare financing involves not only the method of payment, but also the persons contributing to its payment, how the beneficiaries and providers are involved in the transaction and how much is spent on healthcare. Consequently, the way the health sector is financed is quite sensitive, as it can be a deciding factor for the various implications of the overall health care system. The health care system must provide physically, geographically and economically accessible, integrated (vertical connection of primary, secondary, tertiary level and horizontal connection in the system and in relation to the local community) and high quality health care (continuous improvement of the quality of health care and the right of beneficiaries’ physician choice and awareness), personal development of employees working in a health care system, sustainability of financing, decentralization of management and financing of health care, and placement of citizens at the center of the healthcare system end protection. Given the demographic trends present throughout Europe, including the countries of the Western Balkan, and especially the increase in the proportion of the elderly, it is a fact that a larger number of individuals require some health care. Also, the advancement in the field of medicine requires the application of new and more expensive treatments, including new medicines and modern equipment. All this implies, in the long run, an increase in costs and the need for greater investment in the health care system. The healthcare system in the Western Balkan countries is currently facing a number of issues related to health care financing. In particular, some of
Recommended publications
  • Implementing Health 2020: 2012 – 2014 Regional Committee for Europe EUR/RC64/8 Rev
    REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR EUROPE 64TH SESSION Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–18 September 2014 © iStock © iStock © iStock Implementing Health 2020: 2012 – 2014 Regional Committee for Europe EUR/RC64/8 Rev. 1 64th session Copenhagen, 15–18 September 2014 24 July 2014 140461 Provisional agenda item 5(a) ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Implementing Health 2020: 2012–2014 This document describes progress made in implementing Health 2020, the European health policy framework adopted by the WHO Regional Committee for Europe at its sixty-second session in 2012. The Regional Office work taking forward the implementation of the Health 2020 vision across the Region was principally focused on promoting awareness of the Health 2020 and its support studies; integrating Health 2020 values, principles and approaches with every aspect of the technical and planning work of the Regional Office; building capacity for implementation especially at country level; building strategic partnerships with key international agencies and bodies and supporting countries at national and sub-national levels implement Health 2020 through aligning and developing policies and reinforcing Health 2020 perspectives in the implementation of key strategies and plans. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.euro.who.int/en/who-we-are/governance Contents Implementing Health 2020: 2012–2014 1 Awareness and dissemination of Health 2020 and the main
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH PROMOTION and DISEASE PREVENTION a Handbook For
    Health Promotion And Disease Prevention HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION A Handbook for Teachers, Researchers, Health Professionals and Decision Makers Implementation of the New Public Health Principles: Case Title Study of Montenegro Module: 1.9.5 ECTS: 0.25 Author(s), degrees, Agima Ljaljevic, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor institution(s) Institute of Public Healt, Podgorica, Montenegro Address for Agima Ljaljevic, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor correspondence Institute of Public Health Ljubljanska bb, Podgorica, Montenegro Tel: +382 81 412 803 / 382 67 266 795 E-mail: [email protected] Key words public health, Montenegro, health indicators, health care system, health promotion, healthy life style, health policy Learning objectives • Presenting situation in the field of public health in Montenegro. • Description of health policy development in the future • Basic problems in population health status related to life styles 220 Implementation of the New Public Health Principles: Case Study of Montenegro Abstract According to the survey in 2003, 617,749 of inhabitants live in the Republic of Montenegro, and 62% of them live in urban area. Since 1950, changes have been marked in rates of demographic indicators especially significant for the presentation of getting population older, on the territory of Montenegro. The tendency of the rate decrease of born alive, of vital index and increase of expected life’s length are evident, as well as the average age of the population and the index of getting older of the population. Development of the new public health is priority in health policy in Montenegro and Institute of Public Health is the base for the implementation of principles in new public health as an ethical issue which is related to health expenditures, priorities and social philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Services Delivery: a Concept Note
    Health services delivery: a concept note Juan Tello Erica Barbazza Working document Health services delivery: a concept note Working document October 2015 Juan Tello and Erica Barbazza Health Services Delivery Programme WHO Regional Office for Europe Abstract In order for health services delivery to accelerate gains in health outcomes it must continuously adapt and evolve according to the changing health landscape. At present, the case for change is a compelling one. However, despite mounting attention put to reforming health services delivery, there remains a persisting lack of consensus on its conceptualization. This paper aims to take stock of the developments in the literature on health services delivery and lessons from the firsthand experiences of countries, viewing clarity on the performance, processes and system dynamics of health services delivery a prerequisite for the rollout, scale-up and sustainability of reforms. Through a mixed-methods approach, evidence from existing frameworks and tools for measuring services delivery, country case examples and commissioned papers have been reviewed around three key questions: what are the outcomes of health services delivery? How can the health services delivery function be defined? And, how do other health system functions enable the conditions for health services delivery? Keywords DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS EUROPE Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Analysis of the Health Policies on the Accessibility of Healthcare for the Roma Population in Serbia
    IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE HEALTH POLICIES ON THE ACCESSIBILITY OF HEALTHCARE FOR THE ROMA POPULATION IN SERBIA Mirosinka Dinkić, Economic and Social Policy Institute Kosovka Ognjenović, Economic and Social Policy Institute Siobhan McClelland, Oxford Policy Management Belgrade, 2009 Contents: Abstract................................................................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Methodology of analyzing of the impact of health policies on the improvement of the accessibility of health care services to the Roma in Serbia.................................................. 8 2. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH POLICIES....... 10 3. DATA ANALYSIS............................................................................................................ 15 3.1. Health condition of the Roma population in Serbia ..................................................... 15 3.2. Accessibility of health care to the Roma population in Serbia and the use of services . 20 3.3. Conclusions.............................................................................................................. 25 4. POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN HEALTH CARE ............................................................. 26 5. IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTED POLICIES ON ROMA ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE .......... 40 5.1. Impact of implemented policies.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Radiating Knowledge
    Division Health, Education, Social Protection Radiating knowledge How a core of experts based in Croatia is boosting HIV surveillance across Eastern Europe, Central Asia and beyond WHO Collaborating Centre Knowledge Hub for Capacity Development in HIV Surveillance HI IDS Knowledge Hub for Capacity Development in HIV Surveillance Content 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 3. INTRODUCTION . 6 Aims of report . 6 Severe epidemics harming region . 6 Weak surveillance undermines response . 7 4. CAPACITY BUILDING FOR SURVEILLANCE . 9 Tasks, work strategies and structure . 9 Regional Knowledge Hubs . 9 Knowledge Hub for Capacity Development in HIV Surveillance . 9 Capacity development defined . 11 Benefits of a regional approach . 12 Evaluation of capacity development for surveillance . 12 5. RESULTS . 14 Outputs . 14 Outcomes: Case studies . 17 Case study 1: Ukraine . 17 Case study 2: Sub-regional transfer of knowledge in south-east Europe . 19 Case study 3: North Africa and the Middle East . .20 6. LESSONS LEARNT . 23 Further investment would pay major dividends . 24 7. RECOMMENDATIONS . 25 8. REFERENCES . 26 9. ABBREVIATIONS . 27 Annex I: Table 1. Training courses delivered since 2004 . 28 Annex II: Table 2. Numbers per country attending Knowledge Hub training courses . 30 Published by: Responsible: Deutsche Gesellschaft für WHO Collaborating Centre and Knowledge Hub for Capacity Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Development in HIV Surveillance Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 Andrija Stamparˇ School of Public Health, School of Medicine 65760 Eschborn. Germany Rockefellerova 4, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T +49 (0) 61 96 79-0 T +385 (0) 1 4590 142/147 F +49 (0) 61 96 79-1115 F +385 (0) 1 4684 406 I www.gtz.de I www.surveillancezagreb.org German BACKUP Initiative Strategic Information and Research, HIV/AIDS Department World Health Organization 20, Avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland I www.who.int/hiv 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety and Public Health Situation in Serbia
    F DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY FOOD SAFETY AND PUBLIC HEALTH SITUATION IN SERBIA NOTE Abstract This note is composed of two parts. Part one reviews the Serbian food and drink industry, the organisations and controls involved in food safety, food safety concerns, the risk management and risk communication of animal diseases and finally the status of preparation of Serbia against the acquis in the area of food safety. Part two provides an overview of the public health situation in Serbia. It presents the health status of the population and its determinants, and describes the Serbian health care system. It also provides information on the status of, and challenges with regard to, the implementation of the EU acquis. IP/A/ENVI/NT/2013-16&17 October 2013 PE 507.487 EN Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) AUTHORS Food Safety Situation in Serbia Mrs S Keenan, Campden BRI Mr John Hammond, Campden BRI Public Health Situation in Serbia Prof. Vesna Bjegović-Mikanović MD, MSc, PhD Ms Jennifer McGuinn, Milieu Ltd. Mr Damir Petrović, Milieu Ltd. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATORS Food Safety Situation in Serbia Mr Lorenzo VICARIO Public Health Situation in Serbia Ms Purificacion TEJEDOR DEL REAL Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Fifth SEE Meeting Podgorica Dec 2009
    The WHO Regional Office for Europe SITUATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS IN THE SOUTH EAST EUROPE REPORT OF THE FIFTH MEETING OF THE SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPEAN NETWORK ON WORKERS’ HEALTH The World Health Organization (WHO) is a PODGORICA, REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1 DECEMBER 2009 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. The WHO Regional Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the world, each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves. Member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Situation analysis and Italy Kazakhstan recommendations for Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lithuania occupational health systems Luxembourg Malta in the South East Europe Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Report of the Fifth Meeting of Portugal Republic of Moldova the South-Eastern European Romania Russian Federation San Marino Network on Workers’ Health Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Uzbekistan Podgorica, Republic of Montenegro 1 December 2009 World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 39 17 17 17. Fax: +45 39 17 18 18. E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.euro.who.int Situation analysis and recommendations for occupational health systems in the South East Europe Report of the Fifth Meeting of the South-Eastern European Network on Workers’ Health Podgorica, Republic of Montenegro 1 December 2009 ABSTRACT The Fifth meeting of the South-eastern European (SEE) Network on Workers’ Health was held in Podgorica, Republic of Montenegro, on 1 December 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 5, October 2015
    ISSUE 5, OCTOBER 2015 Welcome to the UNECE newsletter for October 2015. This edition is focused on the work by UNECE to develop standard guidance (“Standards”) for the use of Public-Private Partnerships. Partnerships as a means of enabling development will be a key focus of the Sustainable Development Goals, and UNECE is developing a programme of work to support governments in their successful implementation. In this edition of the newsletter, we explore UNECE’s recent work in developing a Standard for PPP policy in the healthcare sector. In addition, there is coverage of a new format for cooperation in the Philippines which will see the ADEC Innovation Foundation with the support of the Philippine Government, providing support for the UNECE affiliated International Specialist Centre of Excellence for PPP in Health. This Centre amongst other things will support the work of various international Project Teams, PPP and Healthcare, ‘last building standing concept’ in the aftermath of a natural disaster, telemedicine and PPP organizational strengthening of hospitals. UNECE PPP NEWSLETTER | 1 MAIN STORY The United Nations Economic Commission for in responding to the clear need for hospitals, Europe (UNECE) is developing a UN Standard clinics, diagnostic facilities and other healthcare to provide guidance to governments planning to infrastructure, and it is particularly important use Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) to develop that the guidance is sustainable and relevant their healthcare infrastructure, improving access to small and medium
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Scaling up and Strengthening the Health-In-All-Policies Approach in South-Eastern Europe
    Opportunities for scaling up and strengthening the health-in-all-policies approach in South-eastern Europe Abstract As an approach, Health in All Policies (HiAP) has been recognized in major European resolutions, charters and communications, treaties, frameworks and action plans. This report aims to gauge opportunities for scaling up and strengthening a HiAP approach in 9 of the South-eastern Europe Health Network (SEEHN) countries. It is based on a review of materials prepared by SEEHN member countries’ representatives for the Third Health Ministers Forum, “Health in All Policies in South-eastern Europe: A Shared Goal and Responsibility”. An overview is followed by detailed country-specific studies of current policy, and challenges, opportunities and recommendations for strengthening HiAP. Adopting a HiAP approach is an effective approach to addressing the root causes of ill-health and improving equity in the region. Firstly, at a time of economic crisis, it is economically sensible to pool resources with other sectors to address common challenges, secondly, it demonstrates how improving health contributes to the attainment of wider objective such as poverty reduction, inclusive growth and community wellbeing, thirdly it can improve the performance of health and social care systems and make them more sustainable. Across the region there is strong political will to support HiAP, progress is being made to strengthen instruments and capacity and examples of promising practice exist. The SEEHN offers an opportunity to build on existing work, .share learning to date and strength action for health and development with other sectors. There is however, more work to be done to scale-up and improve the capacity and performance of HiAP in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 9 May 2020 U Ovom Broju
    PREPARED BY STUDENTS OF MASTER STUDY PROGRAM HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Number 9 May 2020 U ovom broju: • Health workers (physicians, nurses, dentists, pharmacist) density in Montenegro, • E-health in Montenegro, ANAMIRA LASICA RADOVIĆ • Role of the patient - centered health technologies in Montenegro, • Problems caused by temporary measures introduced in Montenegro and the world overall, MILICA MILETIĆ • Covid-19 call center activity report for period 20 March – 18 April 2020, NATALIJA DREKALOVIĆ, BOGDAN LABAN • ThePROF. structure DR DRAGAN of health LAUŠEVIĆ, system DR in Montenegro,ALEKSANDAR OBRADOVIĆ, DR MARIJA TODOROVIĆ, MR ENA GRBOVIĆ • Deaths attributable to air pollution in Montenegro, ŽELJKO MILIĆ • djelatnosti,LUKA MARAŠ Unapređenje aplikativnog rješenja eZdravlje uključivanjem stomatološke zdrastvene • NATAŠA DEVIĆ • MentalCiljevi i metode health statusskrininga in uMontenegro, zdravlju, NATAŠA ŽUGIĆ • Prevencija povreda i nasilja - kratak osvrt, NINA MILOVIĆ • Prevencija i rehabilitacija kardiovaskularnih bolesti, SVETLANA STOJANOVIĆ TIJANA LUČIĆ European Commission Erasmus+ Project: | PROJECT COORDINATOR: University of Donja 573997-EPP-1-2016-1-ME-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Gorica This project has been funded with support from the | Donja Gorica, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro European Commission. | http://www.udg.edu.me This publication [communication] reflects the views | [email protected] only of the author, and the Commission cannot be | Tel:+382(0)20 410 777 held responsible for any use which may be made of | Fax:+382(0)20 410 766
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Mental Health Care Reform Regionally: the Mental Health Project for South-Eastern Europe
    Approaching Mental Health Care Reform Regionally: The Mental Health Project for South-eastern Europe This report was produced for the SEE Mental Health Project, a programme of the SEE Health Network sup- ported by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The editors and main writers were Desmond Maurer and Melita Murko, while the text was reviewed by Ms Vesna Purati}, Regional Project Manager of the SEE Mental Health Project, Dr Matthijs Muijen, Regional Adviser, Mental Health, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Dr Maria Haralanova, Regional Adviser, Public Health Services, SEE Health Network Secretariat, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Special thanks for their contributions are due to the nine Country Project Managers, Dr Zana Kokomani, Albania, Dr Joka Blagov~anin Simi}, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Dr Hristo Hinkov, Bulgaria, Dr Neven Henigsberg, Croatia, Ms Tatijana Mandi} \uri{i}, Montenegro, Dr Larisa Boderskova, Republic of Moldova, Ms Raluca Nica, Romania, Dr Vladimir Jovi}, Serbia, and Dr Vladimir Ortakov, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. We would also like to acknowledge the use in the text of materials provided for various train- ing seminars and workshops by, amongst others, Dr Carlos Artundo, Mr Ray Baird, Professor Athanassios Constantopoulos, Dr Michelle Funk, Dr Margaret Grigg, Dr Paul O'Halloran, Dr Sla|ana [trkalj Ivezi}, Dr Matthijs Muijen, Dr Mario Reali, Dr Colin Rickard, and Professor Peter Ryan. Finally, we are grateful to Dr Judit Csiszar, Regional Director of Project HOPE Central and Eastern Europe, who provided the personnel and ad- ministrative support required for the production of this report. Design and layout were done by Graphic Studio Oskar.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Government of Montenegro on the Visit To
    CPT/Inf (2019) 2 Report to the Government of Montenegro on the visit to Montenegro carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 9 to 16 October 2017 The Government of Montenegro has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2019) 3. Strasbourg, 7 February 2019 - 2 - CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 4 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 8 A. The visit, the report and follow-up.......................................................................................... 8 B. Context of the visit and cooperation encountered ................................................................. 9 C. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention....................... 10 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED .............................. 11 A. Police establishments .............................................................................................................. 11 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 11 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment ......................................................................... 12 3. Investigations into allegations
    [Show full text]