OFFICIAL BALLOT GENERAL ELECTION LARIMER COUNTY, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2006

SCOTT DOYLE CLERK AND RECORDER INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS To vote for the candidate, completely fill in the OVAL to the LEFT of the candidate of your choice. If you tear, deface or wrongly mark this ballot, contact an election official for a replacement. Please use black ink. VOTE LIKE THIS:

"Ballot issues referred by the general assembly or any political subdivision are listed by letter, and ballot issues initiated by the people are listed numerically. A 'yes' vote on any ballot issue is a vote in favor of changing current law or existing circumstances, and a 'no' vote on any ballot issue is a vote against changing current law or existing circumstances." C.R.S. 1- 40-115(2)

FEDERAL OFFICES STATE OFFICES COUNTY OFFICES JUDICIARY

REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 110th REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COUNTY TREASURER COURT OF APPEALS - COLORADO - AT LARGE (Vote for One) (Vote Yes or No) DISTRICT 4 (Vote for One) (Vote for One) Shall Judge Russell E. Carparelli of the Colorado Court of Appeals be Stephen C. Ludwig Myrna Rodenberger Democratic Republican retained in office? Marilyn N. Musgrave Brian Davidson COUNTY ASSESSOR YES Republican Republican (Vote for One) Angie Paccione Daniel "Jeffersonian" Ong NO Democratic Libertarian Eric Eidsness Douglas "Dayhorse" Campbell Steve Miller COURT OF APPEALS Colorado Reform American Constitution Republican (Vote Yes or No) STATE OFFICES Marcus C. McCarty Barbara Liebler Unaffiliated Democratic Shall Judge Janice B. Davidson of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained GOVERNOR/LIEUTENANT STATE SENATE - DISTRICT 15 Jesse P. Herron in office? GOVERNOR (Vote for One) Libertarian (Vote for One Pair) COUNTY SHERIFF YES (Vote for One) Bob Beauprez/Janet Rowland Steve Johnson NO Republican Republican Jennifer Miller James Alderden COURT OF APPEALS Democratic Republican (Vote Yes or No) Bill Ritter Jr./Barbara O'Brien STATE REPRESENTATIVE - COUNTY SURVEYOR Democratic DISTRICT 49 (Vote for One) Shall Judge Alan M. Loeb of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained (Vote for One) in office? Clyde J. Harkins/Tracy Davison Sue Radford Tom Donnelly YES American Constitution Democratic Republican Kevin Lundberg COUNTY CORONER NO Republican (Vote for One) Dawn Winkler-Kinateder/ STATE REPRESENTATIVE - COURT OF APPEALS Richard Randall DISTRICT 51 (Vote Yes or No) Libertarian (Vote for One) Patrick C. Allen Republican Shall Judge Jose D.L. Marquez of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained Paul Noel Fiorino/ CITY OF LOVELAND in office? Heather Anne McKibbin Unaffiliated Jodi L. Radke Ward One YES Democratic (Vote For No More Than One) Don Marostica NO Republican STATE REPRESENTATIVE - Daryle Klassen COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 52 (Vote Yes or No) SECRETARY OF STATE (Vote for One) Cecil A. Gutierrez (Vote for One) Shall Judge Robert M. Russel of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained John Michael Kefalas in office? Democratic ESTES VALLEY RURAL Ken Gordon Bob McCluskey FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT YES Democratic Republican Mike Coffman STATE REPRESENTATIVE - TWO DIRECTORS NO Republican DISTRICT 53 FOR TERMS TO EXPIRE MAY 2008 STATE TREASURER (Vote for One) (Vote for TWO (2)) DISTRICT JUDGE - (Vote for One) 8th JUDICIAL DISTRICT Robert (Bob) Cheney (Vote Yes or No) Democratic Shall Judge James H. Hiatt of the 8th Mark Hillman Anne Yeldell Frederick Day Republican Republican Judicial District be retained in office? Cary Kennedy Mark Brophy Charles T. Hanchett YES Democratic Libertarian ATTORNEY GENERAL Darren Morrison Jeffrey Konzak NO (Vote for One) American Constitution COUNTY OFFICES Floyd J. Denton DISTRICT JUDGE - 8th JUDICIAL DISTRICT Fern O'Brien COUNTY COMMISSIONER - THREE DIRECTORS (Vote Yes or No) Democratic DISTRICT 1 FOR TERMS TO EXPIRE MAY 2010 John Suthers (Vote for One) (Vote for THREE (3)) Shall Judge John David ("Dave") Republican Williams of the 8th Judicial District be Dwight K. Harding Kathay Rennels Jack Rumley retained in office? Libertarian Republican STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - Gerry Horak Carolyn S. Dietz YES CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 4 Unaffiliated (Vote for One) COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER James D. Austin NO (Vote for One) Tom Griggs Democratic Page 1 of 6 Bob Schaffer Scott Doyle Republican Republican Arthur W. Trevethick Libertarian

FRONT Card 1 SEQ# 1 JUDICIARY STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO

COUNTY JUDGE - LARIMER Amendment 41 Referendum F Referendum J (Vote Yes or No) Shall there be an amendment to the An amendment to section 2 of article Shall Colorado state law require that in Shall Judge Peter E. Schoon Jr. of the Colorado constitution concerning XXI of the constitution of the state of each state fiscal year a school district Larimer County Court be retained in standards of conduct by persons who Colorado, concerning elections to spend at least sixty-five percent of its office? are professionally involved with recall state elected officials, and, in operational expenditures on services that directly affect student governmental activities, and, in connection therewith, providing for the YES achievement? connection therewith, prohibiting a deadlines regarding recall petitions NO public officer, member of the general and hearings to be set in statute rather YES assembly, local government official, or than in the constitution and stating that a recall election shall be held as part COUNTY JUDGE - LARIMER government employee from soliciting NO (Vote Yes or No) or accepting certain monetary or in- of a general election if a general election will be held between fifty and kind gifts; prohibiting a professional Referendum K Shall Judge C. Edward Stirman of the lobbyist from giving anything of value ninety days after the time for filing a Larimer County Court be retained in to a public officer, member of the protest has passed and all protests office? have been finally decided. Shall the Colorado state attorney general assembly, local government general initiate or join other states in a YES official, government employee, or such YES lawsuit against the United States person's immediate family member; attorney general to demand the NO prohibiting a statewide elected NO enforcement of all existing federal officeholder or member of the general immigration laws by the federal STATE OF COLORADO assembly from personally representing Referendum G government? another person or entity for compensation before any other such Amendment 38 Amendments to articles XVII, XX, and YES officeholder or member for a period of XXIV of the constitution of the state of two years following departure from Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado, concerning the elimination NO Colorado constitution concerning office; establishing penalties for a of obsolete provisions of the state breach of public trust or inducement of initiative and referendum petitions, constitution. LARIMER COUNTY and, in connection therewith, changing such a breach; creating a five-member petition rights and procedures; independent ethics commission to YES REFERRED ISSUE 1A allowing petitions to be submitted at all hear ethics complaints, to assess LARIMER COUNTY CRIMINAL levels of Colorado government; penalties, and to issue advisory JUSTICE PROPERTY TAX limiting initiative ballot titles to 75 opinions on ethics issues; and NO QUESTION words; changing single-subject specifying that the measure shall not requirements and procedures; limiting apply to home rule jurisdictions that Referendum H the annual number of new laws that SHALL LARIMER COUNTY TAXES have adopted laws concerning matters BE INCREASED $18,675,000 governments may exclude from covered by the measure? SHALL STATE TAXES BE possible referendum petitions; INCREASED ONE HUNDRED FIFTY ANNUALLY (FIRST FULL FISCAL establishing standards for review of YES THOUSAND DOLLARS ANNUALLY YEAR DOLLAR INCREASE IN 2007) filed petitions; specifying that petitions BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE BY THE IMPOSITION OF may be voted on at any November NO COLORADO REVISED STATUTES PROPERTY TAXES AT THE RATE election; limiting the use of THAT ELIMINATES A STATE OF FIVE MILLS ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE COUNTY government resources to discuss a Amendment 42 INCOME TAX BENEFIT FOR A petition; requiring voter approval for BUSINESS THAT PAYS AN WITH ALL REVENUE GENERATED future petition laws and rules and for Shall there be an amendment to the UNAUTHORIZED ALIEN TO BY THE FIVE MILLS TO BE USED changes to certain voter-approved Colorado constitution concerning the PERFORM LABOR SERVICES, AND, SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR petitions; and authorizing measures to state minimum wage, and, in IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ADDRESSING JAIL enforce the amendment? connection therewith, increasing PROHIBITS CERTAIN WAGES OR OVERCROWDING AND EARLY RELEASE OF PRISONERS AND YES Colorado's minimum wage to $6.85 REMUNERATION PAID TO AN per hour, adjusted annually for UNAUTHORIZED ALIEN FOR LABOR PROVIDING AN EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL inflation, and providing that no more SERVICES FROM BEING CLAIMED NO JUSTICE SYSTEM BY PAYING AND than $3.02 per hour in tip income may AS A DEDUCTIBLE BUSINESS FINANCING THE COSTS OF be used to offset the minimum wage of EXPENSE FOR STATE INCOME TAX Amendment 39 ACQUIRING, CONSTRUCTING, employees who regularly receive tips? PURPOSES IF, AT THE TIME THE OPERATING, MAINTAINING AND Shall there be an amendment to the YES BUSINESS HIRED THE EQUIPPING: Colorado constitution concerning a UNAUTHORIZED ALIEN, THE BUSINESS KNEW OF THE requirement that in each state fiscal NO • PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES UNAUTHORIZED STATUS OF THE year a school district spend at least FOR OFFENDERS WITH ALIEN UNLESS SPECIFIED 65% of its operational expenditures on Amendment 43 MENTAL HEALTH AND DRUG classroom instruction, with limited EXCEPTIONS APPLY AND, TO THE OR ALCOHOL ABUSE exceptions? Shall there be an amendment to the EXTENT SUCH A PAYMENT WAS PROBLEMS. Colorado constitution, concerning CLAIMED AS A DEDUCTION IN marriage, and, in connection DETERMINING THE BUSINESS' therewith, specifying that only a union • ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING YES FEDERAL INCOME TAX LIABILITY, of one man and one woman shall be AND WORK PROGRAMS AND valid or recognized as a marriage in REQUIRES AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO NO FACILITIES FOR NON-VIOLENT Colorado? THE PROHIBITED DEDUCTION TO OFFENDERS. BE ADDED TO THE BUSINESS' Amendment 40 YES FEDERAL TAXABLE INCOME FOR • NO LESS THAN 290 THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING ADDITIONAL JAIL BEDS. Shall there be an amendment to the NO STATE INCOME TAX LIABILITY? Colorado constitution concerning term limits for appellate court judges, and, Amendment 44 YES • OTHER DETENTION AND in connection therewith, reducing the CRIMINAL JUSTICE terms of office for justices of the Shall there be an amendment to NO FACILITIES. supreme court and judges of the court section 18-18-406 (1) of the Colorado of appeals to four years, requiring revised statutes making legal the Referendum I AND SHALL THE COUNTY BE appellate judges serving as of January possession of one ounce or less of AUTHORIZED TO LEVY, COLLECT 1, 2007, to stand for retention at the marihuana for any person twenty-one AND SPEND THE PROCEEDS OF years of age or older? Shall there be an amendment to the next general election, if eligible for Colorado Revised Statutes to SUCH TAXES AND EARNINGS another term, prohibiting an appellate THEREON WITHOUT LIMITATION YES authorize domestic partnerships, and, judge from serving more than three in connection therewith, enacting the BY ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE terms, specifying that a provisional COLORADO CONSTITUTION, NO "Colorado Domestic Partnership term constitutes a full term, and Benefits And Responsibilities Act" to SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO making any appellate judge who has REVISED STATUTES, AS Referendum E extend to same-sex couples in a served ten or more years at one court domestic partnership the benefits, AMENDED, OR ANY OTHER LAW? level ineligible for another term at that AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3.5 protections, and responsibilities that level? YES OF ARTICLE X OF THE are granted by Colorado law to YES CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF spouses, providing the conditions NO COLORADO, CONCERNING THE under which a license for a domestic partnership may be issued and the NO EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR criteria under which a domestic partnership may be dissolved, making QUALIFYING SENIORS TO ANY REFERRED QUESTION 2A UNITED STATES MILITARY provisions for implementation of the VETERAN WHO IS ONE HUNDRED act, and providing that a domestic Shall the Home Rule Charter PERCENT PERMANENTLY partnership is not a marriage, which Proposed by the Home Rule Charter DISABLED DUE TO A SERVICE- consists of the union of one man and Commission be Adopted by the Town CONNECTED DISABILITY. one woman? of Johnstown? YES YES YES

NO NO NO

Page 2 of 6

BACK Card 1 SEQ# 1 TOWN OF BERTHOUD TOWN OF BERTHOUD CITY OF FORT COLLINS TOWN OF TIMNATH

REFERRED ISSUE 2B REFERRED ISSUE 2C REFERRED ISSUE 2D REFERRED QUESTION 2F TOWN OF BERTHOUD ELECTION TOWN OF BERTHOUD ELECTION A CITY-INITIATED MEASURE Approving the Timnath Home Rule TO INCREASE THE MILL LEVY BY 3 TO INCREASE THE MILL LEVY BY TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE Charter, as drafted by the MILLS TO SUPPLEMENT THE 1.9 MILLS TO SUPPLEMENT THE OF BONDS FOR DOWNTOWN Town of Timnath POLICE DEPARTMENT BERTHOUD PUBLIC LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Home Rule Charter commission PROJECTS SHALL THE TOWN OF BERTHOUD, SHALL THE TOWN OF BERTHOUD, Shall the Town of Timnath Home Rule COLORADO TAXES BE INCREASED COLORADO TAXES BE INCREASED SHALL CITY OF FORT COLLINS Charter, as drafted by the Town of $161,958 IN THE FIRST FISCAL $83,600 IN THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR DEBT BE INCREASED BY NO MORE Timnath Home Rule Charter YEAR (2007) AND ANNUALLY (2007) AND ANNUALLY THAN $150,000,000 WITH A Commission, be approved? THEREAFTER FOR A PERIOD NOT THEREAFTER FOR A PERIOD NOT REPAYMENT COST OF YES TO EXCEED TEN (10) YEARS IN TO EXCEED TEN (10) YEARS IN $250,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE SUCH AMOUNTS AS ARE SUCH AMOUNTS AS ARE OF FINANCING THE COSTS OF NO RECEIVED EACH YEAR BY THE RECEIVED EACH YEAR BY THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO BE IMPOSITION OF AN ADDITIONAL IMPOSITION OF AN ADDITIONAL UNDERTAKEN BY OR ON BEHALF CITY OF LOVELAND MILL LEVY NOT TO EXCEED THREE MILL LEVY OF ONE AND NINE OF THE FORT COLLINS (3) MILLS UPON TAXABLE REAL TENTHS (1.9) MILLS UPON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT REFERRED QUESTION 2G PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN, TAXABLE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO THE Amending City Of Loveland Charter COMMENCING WITH THE TAX THE TOWN, COMMENCING WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF Section 4-9 To Change The COLLECTION YEAR 2007, AND THE TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2007, COLORADO LAW AND THE FORT Ordinance Adoption Procedure CONTINUING THEREAFTER, SUCH AND CONTINUING THEREAFTER, COLLINS DOWNTOWN Pertaining To The Publication Of REVENUES TO BE COLLECTED, SUCH REVENUES TO BE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PLAN Ordinances. RETAINED, AND SPENT FOR THE COLLECTED, RETAINED, AND OF DEVELOPMENT, AS SUCH PLAN PURPOSES TO SUPPORT POLICE SPENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF: MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO Shall Section 4-9 Of The City Of DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS WHICH REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF TIME; SUCH DEBT AND THE Loveland Charter Be Amended To INCLUDE FUNDING TO APPLY FOR LIBRARY FACILITIES; RESTORING INTEREST THEREON TO BE Change The Procedure For The GRANTS WHICH WOULD SUPPORT OFFSITE INTERNET ACCESS TO PAYABLE SOLELY FROM AND Publication Of Ordinances By POLICE DEPARTMENT THE CATALOG OF LIBRARY SECURED BY A PLEDGE OF THE Permitting Ordinances To Be OPERATIONS; ENHANCE DRUG MATERIALS; UPDATING OF SPECIAL FUND OF THE CITY Published In The Newspaper By Title AND ALCOHOL ENFORCEMENT COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE; WHICH SHALL CONTAIN AD Only Instead Of Publishing The Full WITH EMPHASIS IN THE SCHOOLS; SUPPLEMENTING BOOKS, MEDIA, VALOREM PROPERTY TAX INCREASED PATROLLING FOR Text And By Adding The Requirement AND INTERNET ACCESS; INCREMENT REVENUES LEVIED That The Full Text Of The Ordinance THEFT PREVENTION AND EXPANDING SERVICES, HOURS AND COLLECTED WITHIN THE SECURITY WITH SUCH MILL LEVY Be Posted On The City’s Official AND PROGRAMS SUCH AS BOUNDARIES OF THE AUTHORITY; Internet Website? TO BE REVIEWED EVERY TWO (2) CHILDREN’S STORY HOUR, THE AND SHALL SUCH DEBT BE YEARS TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUMMER READING PROGRAM AND EVIDENCED BY BONDS, NOTES, YES OR NOT THESE FUNDS ARE STILL TEEN TRAINING CLASSES AND CONTRACTS OR OTHER NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE ACTIVITIES; AND, OTHER FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS TO BE NO FOR THE PURPOSES SPECIFIED GENERAL LIBRARY PURPOSES SOLD OVER TIME IN ONE SERIES HEREIN WITHOUT REGARD TO WITH SUCH MILL LEVY TO BE OR MORE FOR A PRICE ABOVE OR ANY SPENDING, REVENUE- REVIEWED EVERY TWO (2) YEARS BELOW THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT RAISING, OR OTHER LIMITATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEREOF, ON SUCH TERMS AND CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, THESE FUNDS ARE STILL CONDITIONS, AND WITH SUCH SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE MATURITIES AS MAY BE CONSTITUTION OR SECTION 29-1- FOR THE PURPOSES SPECIFIED PERMITTED BY LAW AND AS THE 301, COLORADO REVISED HEREIN WITHOUT REGARD TO CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE, STATUTES? ANY SPENDING, REVENUE- INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR RAISING, OR OTHER LIMITATION YES REDEMPTION OF THE DEBT PRIOR CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, TO MATURITY WITH OR WITHOUT SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO NO PAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM OF CONSTITUTION OR SECTION 29-1- NOT MORE THAN 3% OF THE 301, COLORADO REVISED PRINCIPAL AMOUNT SO STATUTES? REDEEMED AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS FROM SUCH DEBT YES AND ANY INVESTMENT INCOME EARNED FROM SUCH PROCEEDS NO BE COLLECTED AND SPENT AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE X OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? YES

NO

REFERRED ISSUE 2E A CITY-INITIATED MEASURE TO REPEAL CITIZEN-INITIATED ORDINANCE NO. 142, 1999, PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THE COLORADO HIGHWAY 14 TRUCK ROUTE

Shall citizen-initiated Ordinance No. 142, 1999, which requires the City of Fort Collins to work with other affected government agencies to pursue the relocation of the Colorado Highway 14 Truck Route to a location outside the City's Growth Management Area boundaries and which also requires the City to use all funds remaining from the "Building Community Choices" Capital Improvement Program for such relocation efforts, be repealed in its entirety, so that said ordinance would be of no further force and effect and the remaining funds referenced in the ordinance, in the approximate amount of $1.8 million, would instead be used either to further pursue the relocation of the Colorado Highway 14 Truck Route or to fund transportation capital improvement projects in the northeast quadrant of the City or for both such purposes? YES Page 3 of 6 NO

FRONT Card 2 SEQ# 1 THOMPSON SCHOOL DISTRICT R2-J PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 ESTES VALLEY RURAL REFERRED ISSUE 3A REFERRED ISSUE 3B REFERRED ISSUE 3C FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

SHALL THOMPSON SCHOOL SHALL PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R- SHALL PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R- REFERRED QUESTION 5A DISTRICT R2-J’S TAXES BE 3 TAXES BE INCREASED UP TO 3 DEBT BE INCREASED INCREASED $6,540,000 ANNUALLY $740,000 ANNUALLY FOR $22,400,000, WITH A REPAYMENT Shall the Estes Valley Rural Fire (OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS PURPOSES OF, AMONG OTHER COST OF UP TO $47,000,000, AND Protection District be formed and THE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY THINGS, SHALL DISTRICT TAXES BE organized in accordance with its approved Service Plan? ANNUALLY DETERMINE), TO BE INCREASED BY UP TO $2,000,000 • DEPOSITED IN THE GENERAL BEING COMPETITIVE WITH ANNUALLY FOR THE PURPOSES YES FUND OF THE DISTRICT FOR OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN OF EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AS SALARY AND BENEFITS PAID NO APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN • IMPROVING THE SCIENCE, EDUCATION WITH EXPENDITURES HIGH QUALITY TEACHERS TECHNOLOGY, SPECIAL REFERRED ISSUE 5B REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC AND STAFF, EDUCATION, AND GIFTED AND ANNUALLY, WHICH PURPOSES TALENTED EDUCATION SHALL ESTES VALLEY RURAL FIRE • SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE PROVIDING FUNDING FOR SPACES AT THE MIDDLE PROTECTION DISTRICT TAXES BE LIMITED TO: ADDITIONAL COURSE SCHOOL, AND RENOVATE INCREASED BY $432,558 OFFERINGS FOR HIGH AND IMPROVE OTHER SPACE COMMENCING IN TAX YEAR 2006 • RESTORING 54 TEACHING SCHOOL STUDENTS AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL IN FOR COLLECTION IN FISCAL YEAR POSITIONS IN ORDER TO INCLUDING DUAL HIGH ORDER TO MEET CURRENT 2007, AND BY WHATEVER REDUCE CLASS SIZE AND SCHOOL/COLLEGE CREDIT, BUILDING AND SAFETY ADDITIONAL DOLLAR AMOUNTS RETURN THE STUDENT- AND VOCATIONAL CODES, ARE RAISED ANNUALLY TEACHER RATIO TO THE 2005- EDUCATION COURSES, THEREAFTER BY A MILL LEVY OF 06 LEVEL; • NOT MORE THAN 4.25 MILLS • IMPROVING THE SCIENCE, PROVIDING ADDITIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND ARTS LEVIED UPON ALL TAXABLE • MAINTAINING ADVANCED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS EDUCATION SPACES AT THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT, COLLEGE PREPARATORY FOR READING AND WRITING HIGH SCHOOL, AND THE PROCEEDS OF WHICH WILL INTERVENTIONS, AND CLASSES FOR QUALIFIED RENOVATE AND IMPROVE BE USED TO DEFRAY THE INCREASED SUMMER HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS; OTHER SPACE AT THE HIGH GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES SCHOOL AND AFTER-SCHOOL SCHOOL IN ORDER TO MEET OF THE DISTRICT? OFFERINGS, AND • FUNDING UTILITY AND CURRENT BUILDING AND YES OPERATING COSTS OF NEW SAFETY CODES, • PROVIDING INCREASED SCHOOLS AND ADDITIONS FUNDING FOR K-5 • NO AUTHORIZED IN THE 2005 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS, CREATING A SINGLE GRADES BOND; PRE-K - 5 SCHOOL BY BY AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY CONSOLIDATION OF TWO FORT COLLINS REGIONAL • SUPPORTING LITERACY AND TAX TO BE LEVIED AT A RATE EXISTING FACILITIES, LIBRARY DISTRICT MATH INSTRUCTION FOR SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE THROUGH THE STUDENTS; AMOUNT SPECIFIED ABOVE, CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM REFERRED ISSUE 5C WHICH TAXES SHALL BE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE • SPACE AT THE INTERMEDIATE PROVIDING STUDENTS WITH DEPOSITED INTO THE GENERAL FORT COLLINS REGIONAL SCHOOL, ADEQUATE ACCESS TO FUND OF THE DISTRICT, SHALL BE LIBRARY DISTRICT CURRENT COMPUTER IN ADDITION TO THE PROPERTY • COMMUNICATION TAXES THAT OTHERWISE WOULD MAKING OTHER CAMPUS SITE SHALL THE FORT COLLINS TECHNOLOGY; AND BE LEVIED FOR THE GENERAL AND FACILITY REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT BE FUND AND SHALL CONSTITUTE A IMPROVEMENTS TO ENABLE ESTABLISHED AND ITS TAXES BE WITH SUCH TAXES TO BE RAISED VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE BETTER ACCESS TO SET AT $5,779,377 ANNUALLY FOR IN THE 2006-2007 BUDGET YEAR CHANGE? PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, COLLECTION IN 2007 AND BY AND EACH BUDGET YEAR IMPROVE SCHOOL BUILDING SUCH ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS THEREAFTER BY MILL LEVY YES ENERGY EFFICIENCY, RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER CERTIFIED AGAINST THE RENOVATE THE AQUATIC BY AN AD VALOREM PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL NO CENTER, AND MAKE OTHER TAX MILL LEVY IMPOSED AT A TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE RENOVATIONS, RATE OF 3 MILLS (WHICH IN 2006 DISTRICT, PROVIDED THAT THE IS APPROXIMATELY $3.98 PER MILL LEVY FOR THIS TAX AND, TO THE EXTENT FUNDS ARE MONTH ON A $200,000.00 HOME) INCREASE IN EACH YEAR SHALL AVAILABLE AFTER PROVIDING TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE LIBRARY NEVER EXCEED 4.15 MILLS FOR THE ABOVE PURPOSES, FOR DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND TO (ESTIMATED TO RESULT IN THE PURPOSE OF REPAIRING, PROVIDE SERVICES SUCH AS: $4,976,084 IN ADDITIONAL IMPROVING AND MAKING PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IN ADDITIONS TO SCHOOL • MAINTAINING, IMPROVING BUDGET YEAR 2006-2007 AND FACILITIES, BY THE ISSUANCE AND EXPANDING LIBRARY $6,540,000 IN ADDITIONAL AND PAYMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES PROPERTY TAX REVENUES IN OBLIGATION BONDS, WHICH BUDGET YEAR 2009-2010 AND BONDS SHALL BEAR INTEREST AT • INCREASING HOURS OF EACH YEAR THEREAFTER), WHICH A MAXIMUM NET EFFECTIVE OPERATION AT MAIN AND SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO THE INTEREST RATE NOT TO EXCEED HARMONY LIBRARIES AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX 6.0% AND MATURE, BE SUBJECT REVENUES THAT OTHERWISE TO REDEMPTION, WITH OR • OPENING AND OPERATING A WOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE WITHOUT PREMIUM, AND BE PROPOSED NEW SOUTHEAST GENERAL FUND MILL LEVY ISSUED, DATED AND SOLD AT BRANCH LIBRARY PERMITTED UNDER STATE LAW SUCH TIME OR TIMES, AT SUCH WITHOUT SUCH INCREASE, AND PRICES (AT, ABOVE OR BELOW • PROVIDING ENHANCED WITH SUCH ADDITIONAL PAR) AND IN SUCH MANNER AND LIBRARY SERVICES AND PROPERTY TAX REVENUES CONTAINING SUCH TERMS, NOT OPERATIONS SUCH AS RE- TOGETHER WITH REVENUES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH, AS ESTABLISHING AND ADDING FROM SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP THE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY NEW BOOK DROPS IN FORT TAXES ATTRIBUTABLE THERETO DETERMINE; SHALL PROPERTY COLLINS AND THE AND ANY EARNINGS FROM THE TAXES BE LEVIED IN ANY YEAR, SURROUNDING AREA, BUYING INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES WITHOUT LIMITATION AS TO RATE NEW BOOKS AND MEDIA AND IMPROVING PROGRAMS FOR AND TAXES TO CONSTITUTE AND IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT CHILDREN, TEENS AND VOTER APPROVED REVENUE AND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF, ADULTS; SPENDING CHANGES UNDER, TO PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND INTEREST ON SUCH BONDS AND TO FUND BE COLLECTED AND SPENT EACH AND, SHALL THE DISTRICT BE YEAR WITHOUT LIMITATION BY ANY RESERVES FOR THE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, THE REVENUE AND SPENDING PAYMENT THEREOF; AND SHALL RETAIN AND SPEND THE LIMITS OF, AND WITHOUT ANY EARNINGS FROM THE ADDITIONAL REVENUE ALONG AFFECTING THE DISTRICT’S INVESTMENT OF THE PROCEEDS WITH ALL OTHER REVENUES, ABILITY TO COLLECT AND SPEND OF SUCH TAXES AND BONDS NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER REVENUES OR FUNDS (REGARDLESS OF AMOUNT) LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION ON UNDER, ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 CONSTITUTE A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE OR SPENDING NOW OF THE COLORADO REVENUE CHANGE? CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO LAW? YES CONSTITUTION AND SECTION 29- 1-103 ET SEQ., C.R.S. OR ANY YES NO OTHER LAW? NO YES

NO

Page 4 of 6

BACK Card 2 SEQ# 1 LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

BRUNS #35 CROWN POINT #27 BONNELL WEST #36 CHARLES HEIGHTS #32 REFERRED ISSUE 5D REFERRED ISSUE 5E REFERRED ISSUE 5F REFERRED ISSUE 5G

SHALL TAXES BE INCREASED SHALL TAXES BE INCREASED SHALL TAXES BE INCREASED SHALL TAXES BE INCREASED $85,000 ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST $30,000 ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST $60,000 ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST $10,399 ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST YEAR) OR SUCH GREATER YEAR) OR SUCH GREATER YEAR) OR SUCH GREATER YEAR) OR SUCH GREATER AMOUNT AS IS RAISED IN AMOUNT AS IS RAISED IN AMOUNT AS IS RAISED IN AMOUNT AS IS RAISED IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS WITHIN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS WITHIN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS WITHIN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED BRUNS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CROWN POINT PUBLIC BONNELL WEST PUBLIC CHARLES HEIGHTS PUBLIC DISTRICT NO. 35 BY THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 36 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 32 IMPOSITION OF AD VALOREM BY THE IMPOSITION OF AD BY THE IMPOSITION OF AD BY THE IMPOSITION OF AD PROPERTY TAXES AT A MILL LEVY VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES AT A VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES AT A VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES AT A RATE NOT TO EXCEED 104.222 MILL LEVY RATE NOT TO EXCEED MILL LEVY RATE NOT TO EXCEED MILL LEVY RATE NOT TO EXCEED MILLS, THE REVENUES OF WHICH 56.844 MILLS, THE REVENUES OF 13.580 MILLS, THE REVENUES OF 8.948 MILLS, THE REVENUES OF WILL BE COLLECTED BEGINNING WHICH WILL BE COLLECTED WHICH WILL BE COLLECTED WHICH WILL BE COLLECTED JANUARY 1, 2007 AND EACH YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2007 AND BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2007 AND BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2007 AND THEREAFTER, SUCH REVENUES EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, SUCH EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, SUCH EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, SUCH TO BE USED FOR THE REVENUES TO BE USED FOR THE REVENUES TO BE USED FOR THE REVENUES TO BE USED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADS AS MAINTENANCE OF ROADS AS MAINTENANCE OF ROADS AS MAINTENANCE OF ROADS AS REQUESTED IN THE PETITION FOR REQUESTED IN THE PETITION FOR REQUESTED IN THE PETITION REQUESTED IN THE PETITION FOR CREATION OF THE DISTRICT AND CREATION OF THE DISTRICT AND CREATION OF THE DISTRICT AND FOR CREATION OF THE DISTRICT FOR THE GENERAL OPERATING FOR THE GENERAL OPERATING FOR THE GENERAL OPERATING AND FOR THE GENERAL EXPENSES; SHALL THE BRUNS EXPENSES; SHALL THE CROWN EXPENSES; SHALL THE CHARLES OPERATING EXPENSES; SHALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT POINT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEIGHTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT THE BONNELL WEST PUBLIC NO. 35 BE CREATED; AND SHALL DISTRICT NO. 27 BE CREATED; DISTRICT NO. 32 BE CREATED; THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES, AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 36 AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF THE SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES SUCH TAXES, THE SPECIFIC BE CREATED; AND SHALL THE SUCH TAXES, THE SPECIFIC RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT AND OWNERSHIP TAXES RECEIVED BY PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES, THE OWNERSHIP TAXES RECEIVED BY INVESTMENT EARNINGS ON BOTH THE DISTRICT AND INVESTMENT SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES THE DISTRICT AND INVESTMENT CONSTITUTE VOTER APPROVED EARNINGS ON BOTH CONSTITUTE RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT AND EARNINGS ON BOTH CONSTITUTE REVENUE AND/OR SPENDING VOTER APPROVED REVENUE INVESTMENT EARNINGS ON VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGES AND BE COLLECTED AND/OR SPENDING CHANGES AND BOTH CONSTITUTE VOTER AND/OR SPENDING CHANGES AND AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY APPROVED REVENUE AND/OR BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY THE DISTRICT WITHOUT REGARD SPENDING CHANGES AND BE THE DISTRICT WITHOUT REGARD SPENDING, REVENUE RAISING OR TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED RAISING OR OTHER LIMITATION DISTRICT WITHOUT REGARD TO RAISING OR OTHER LIMITATION WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, ANY SPENDING, REVENUE CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION; SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO RAISING OR OTHER LIMITATION SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE CONSTITUTION; AND SHALL THE CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, CONSTITUTION; AND SHALL THE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND FROM ITS MILL LEVY ANY COLLECT AND EXPEND FROM ITS CONSTITUTION; AND SHALL THE COLLECT AND EXPEND FROM ITS SUCH AMOUNT WHICH IS MORE MILL LEVY ANY SUCH AMOUNT DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO MILL LEVY ANY SUCH AMOUNT THAN THE AMOUNT WHICH WHICH IS MORE THAN THE COLLECT AND EXPEND FROM ITS WHICH IS MORE THAN THE WOULD OTHERWISE BE AMOUNT WHICH WOULD MILL LEVY ANY SUCH AMOUNT AMOUNT WHICH WOULD PERMITTED UNDER THE 5½% OTHERWISE BE PERMITTED WHICH IS MORE THAN THE OTHERWISE BE PERMITTED LIMIT IMPOSED BY SECTION 29-1- UNDER THE 5½% LIMIT IMPOSED AMOUNT WHICH WOULD UNDER THE 5½% LIMIT IMPOSED 301, COLORADO REVISED BY SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO OTHERWISE BE PERMITTED BY SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO STATUTES IN 2007 AND EACH REVISED STATUTES IN 2007 AND UNDER THE 5½% LIMIT IMPOSED REVISED STATUTES IN 2007 AND YEAR THEREAFTER? EACH YEAR THEREAFTER? BY SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO EACH YEAR THEREAFTER? REVISED STATUTES IN 2007 AND YES YES EACH YEAR THEREAFTER? YES NO NO YES NO

NO

Page 5 of 6

FRONT Card 3 SEQ# 1 LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY LARIMER COUNTY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

VINE DRIVE #29 VINE DRIVE #29 ARAPAHOE PINES #1991-1 NAMAQUA HILLS #8 REFERRED ISSUE 5H REFERRED ISSUE 5I REFERRED ISSUE 5J REFERRED ISSUE 5L OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DEBT QUESTION MILL LEVY INCREASE MILL LEVY INCREASE MILL LEVY SHALL LARIMER COUNTY VINE SHALL LARIMER COUNTY SHALL LARIMER COUNTY SHALL THE VINE DRIVE PUBLIC DRIVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ARAPAHOE PINES GENERAL NAMAQUA HILLS GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #29 DISTRICT #29 DEBT BE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 INCREASED $285,000 WITH A 1991-1 TAXES BE INCREASED TAXES BE INCREASED $28,500 TAXES BE INCREASED TO $12,000 $14,256 ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST ANNUALLY, OR BY SUCH LESSER REPAYMENT COST OF $520,000; ANNUALLY (IN THE FIRST YEAR) YEAR) OR SUCH GREATER OR SUCH GREATER AMOUNT AS IS AMOUNT AS THE BOARD OF AND SHALL THE DISTRICT TAXES AMOUNT AS IS RAISED IN RAISED IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS DIRECTORS MAY ANNUALLY BE INCREASED $34,516 ANNUALLY, SUBSEQUENT YEARS BY THE BY THE IMPOSITION OF 8.382 DETERMINE IS NECESSARY TO OR BY SUCH LESSER ANNUAL IMPOSITION OF 40.204 MILLS AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY MILLS UPON TAXABLE REAL PAY DISTRICT OPERATIONAL UPON TAXABLE REAL PROPERTY PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT, TO PAY THE DISTRICT’S DEBT; COSTS AND TO PAY THE COSTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT, THE THE REVENUES OF WHICH WILL SUCH DEBT TO CONSIST OF OF CONSTRUCTION, REVENUES OF WHICH WILL BE BE COLLECTED BEGINNING INSTALLATION AND CONTINUED INSTRUMENTS ISSUED FOR THE COLLECTED BEGINNING JANUARY JANUARY 1, 2007, AND EACH YEAR MAINTENANCE OF ROADS WITHIN PURPOSE OF FINANCING ALL OR 1, 2007, AND EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, SUCH REVENUES THE DISTRICT, SUCH TAXES TO ANY PART OF THE COSTS OF THEREAFTER, SUCH REVENUES TO BE USED FOR THE CONSIST OF AN AD VALOREM MILL ACQUIRING, CONSTRUCTING, TO BE USED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND LEVY IMPOSED WITHOUT RELOCATING, AND OTHERWISE IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADS IN THE LIMITATION OF RATE OR WITH PROVIDING, WITHIN THE MAINTENANCE OF ROADS IN THE DISTRICT AND FOR THE GENERAL DISTRICT AND FOR THE GENERAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT, OPERATING EXPENSES OF THE SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE OPERATING EXPENSES OF THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND DISTRICT, AND SHALL THE DETERMINED BY THE BOARD OF DISTRICT, AND SHALL THE ANY INCIDENTAL AND PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX, THE DIRECTORS OF THE DISTRICT, PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX, THE AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF APPURTENANT IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES TO SAID DISTRICT FACILITIES, SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAXES SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT AND RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT AND SUCH DEBT TO BEAR INTEREST INCOME THEREON BE COLLECTED INVESTMENT EARNINGS ON BOTH INVESTMENT EARNINGS ON BOTH AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AS A AT A NET EFFECTIVE INTEREST CONSTITUTE VOTER APPROVED CONSTITUTE VOTER APPROVED VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE RATE NOT IN EXCESS OF 8% PER REVENUE AND/OR SPENDING REVENUE AND/OR SPENDING CHANGE IN 2007 AND IN EACH ANNUM, SUCH INTEREST TO BE CHANGES AND BE COLLECTED CHANGES AND BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT YEAR THEREAFTER, WITHOUT PAYABLE AT SUCH TIME OR TIMES AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY REGARD TO ANY SPENDING, AND WHICH MAY COMPOUND AS WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE SPENDING, REVENUE RAISING OR REVENUE-RAISING, OR OTHER SPENDING, REVENUE RAISING OR DISTRICT, SUCH DEBT TO BE OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED LIMITATION CONTAINED WITHIN OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED INCURRED AT ONE TIME OR FROM WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF TIME TO TIME, TO BE PAID FROM THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION; THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION; COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR ANY LEGALLY AVAILABLE MONEYS AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO OF THE DISTRICT, INCLUDING AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND REVISED STATUTES, AND WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE EXPEND FROM ITS MILL LEVY ANY EXPEND FROM ITS MILL LEVY ANY WITHOUT LIMITING IN ANY YEAR PROCEEDS OF AD VALOREM SUCH AMOUNT WHICH IS MORE SUCH AMOUNT WHICH IS MORE THE AMOUNT OF OTHER PROPERTY TAXES FROM A MILL THAN THE AMOUNT WHICH THAN THE AMOUNT WHICH REVENUES THAT MAY BE LEVY IMPOSED ON ALL TAXABLE WOULD OTHERWISE BE WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERMITTED UNDER THE 5.5% COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE PROPERTY OF THE DISTRICT, PERMITTED UNDER THE 5.5% LIMIT IMPOSED BY SECTION 29-1- DISTRICT? WITHOUT LIMITATION OF RATE OR LIMIT IMPOSED BY SECTION 29-1- 301, COLORADO REVISED 301, COLORADO REVISED WITH SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY STATUTES IN 2007 AND EACH STATUTES IN 2007 AND EACH YES BE DETERMINED BY THE BOARD YEAR THEREAFTER? YEAR THEREAFTER? AND IN AMOUNTS SUFFICIENT TO NO PRODUCE THE ANNUAL INCREASE YES YES SET FORTH ABOVE OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS MAY BE NO NO NECESSARY, TO BE USED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING ARAPAHOE PINES #1991-1 NAMAQUA HILLS #8 THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF REFERRED ISSUE 5K REFERRED ISSUE 5M ANY, AND INTEREST ON THE REVENUE RETENTION REVENUE RETENTION DISTRICT’S DEBT; AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF ANY SUCH DEBT SHALL LARIMER COUNTY SHALL LARIMER COUNTY AND THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH ARAPAHOE PINES GENERAL NAMAQUA HILLS GENERAL TAXES, ANY OTHER REVENUE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 1991-1 RETAIN AS AN APPROVED RETAIN AS AN APPROVED USED TO PAY SUCH DEBT, AND REVENUE CHANGE $250 FOR REVENUE CHANGE $2250 FOR INVESTMENT INCOME THEREON, FISCAL YEAR 2005 AND $14,000 FISCAL YEAR 2005 AND $15,000 BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 INSTEAD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 INSTEAD THE DISTRICT AS A VOTER- OF REFUNDING SAID AMOUNTS AS OF REFUNDING SAID AMOUNTS AS APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE, REQUIRED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION REQUIRED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY 20 OF THE COLORADO 20 OF THE COLORADO SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING OR CONSTITUTION? CONSTITUTION? OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF YES YES THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION AND WITHOUT LIMITING IN ANY NO NO YEAR THE AMOUNT OF OTHER REVENUES THAT MAY BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT? YES

NO

Page 6 of 6

END OF BALLOT

BACK Card 3 SEQ# 1