North London Railway Infrastructure Project (NLRIP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

North London Railway Infrastructure Project (NLRIP) Project Background North London Railway Infrastructure Project (NLRIP) For many years the North London Line (NLL) was ‘London’s forgotten railway’, perceived as ‘shabby, unreliable, unsafe and overcrowded’. The Client need for improvement became all the more pressing when in July 2005 London Overground London won the bid for the 2012 Olympic Games, as the line was a key Location route to the Olympic Park at Stratford. London, UK In February 2009, London Overground and Network Rail signed an Start Date agreement to deliver the North London Railway Infrastructure Project 2009 (NLRIP) to design and implement their agreed joint proposals to address the immediate issues on the route and accommodate future End Date traffic growth. The two year programme of works was funded by London 2011 Overground, Network Rail and the Olympic Delivery Authority with Duration Network Rail and London Overground forming a partnership to manage 27 months this complex and challenging project. Contract Value The project won a number of awards and commendations including £350m being voted Project of the Year at the National Rail Awards 2011. Services Provided Whole railway upgrade, programme management, timetabling, railway performance & whole life cost analysis For more information please visit www.networkrailconsulting.com Scope of Works This complex project, which took 3.5 diverting a Victorian sewer running maintenance of existing capacity for million person hours to complete, under and parallel to the original freight traffic (four trains per hour) included: 1800’s track into a new and extension of the East London Line deeper alignment upgrading 4 stations to Highbury and Islington to create extensive cutting wall an interchange with the North lengthening 16 platforms stabilisation works London Line replacing 69 sets of points planning 850 possessions. infrastructure to enable longer installing and commissioning passenger trains to run 200 new signals Key Project Outputs greater reliability and better closing 4 signal boxes and The project created a rejuvenated, connections for the 2012 Games. transferring control to an integrated modern, efficient railway, serving both electronic control centre passenger and freight on a key part of London’s overground rail network. The laying more than of 200km of key outputs were: signalling cable a more frequent passenger service: laying 10km of new track four trains per hour during peak installing or renewing 14km of periods on each of the Stratford- overhead line Richmond and Stratford-Clapham Junction routes, providing eight trains an hour between Willesden Junction and Stratford For more information please visit www.networkrailconsulting.com.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

History of the East London Line
HISTORY OF THE EAST LONDON LINE – FROM BRUNEL’S THAMES TUNNEL TO THE LONDON OVERGROUND by Oliver Green A report of the LURS meeting at All Souls Club House on 11 October 2011 Oliver worked at the London Transport Museum for many years and was one of the team who set up the Covent Garden museum in 1980. He left in 1989 to continue his museum career in Colchester, Poole and Buckinghamshire before returning to LTM in 2001 to work on its recent major refurbishment and redisplay in the role of Head Curator. He retired from this post in 2009 but has been granted an honorary Research Fellowship and continues to assist the museum in various projects. He is currently working with LTM colleagues on a new history of the Underground which will be published by Penguin in October 2012 as part of LU’s 150th anniversary celebrations for the opening of the Met [Bishops Road to Farringdon Street 10 January 1863.] The early 1800s saw various schemes to tunnel under the River Thames, including one begun in 1807 by Richard Trevithick which was abandoned two years later when the workings were flooded. This was started at Rotherhithe, close to the site later chosen by Marc Isambard Brunel for his Thames Tunnel. In 1818, inspired by the boring technique of shipworms he had studied while working at Chatham Dockyard, Brunel patented a revolutionary method of digging through soft ground using a rectangular shield. His giant iron shield was divided into 12 independently moveable protective frames, each large enough for a miner to work in.
[Show full text]
The Operator's Story Appendix
Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
[Show full text]
Kings Cross to Liverpool Street Via 13 Stations Walk
Saturday Walkers Club www.walkingclub.org.uk Kings Cross to Liverpool Street via 13 stations walk All London’s railway terminals, the three royal parks, the River Thames and the City Length 21.3km (13.3 miles) for the whole walk, but it is easily split into smaller sections: see Walk Options below Toughness 1 out of 10 - entirely flat, but entirely on hard surfaces: definitely a walk to wear cushioned trainers and not boots. Features This walk links (and in many cases passes through) all thirteen London railway terminals, and tells you something of their history along the way. But its attractions are not just limited to railway architecture. It also passes through the three main Central London parks - Regent’s Park, Hyde Park/Kensington Gardens and St James's Parks - and along the Thames into and through the City of London*. It takes in a surprising number of famous sights and a number of characteristic residential and business areas: in fact, if you are first time visitor to London, it is as good an introduction as any to what the city has to offer. Despite being a city centre walk, it spends very little of its time on busy roads, and has many idyllic spots in which to sit or take refreshment. In the summer months you can even have an open air swim midway through the walk in Hyde Park's Serpentine Lido. (* The oldest part of London, now the financial district. Whenever the City, with a capital letter, is used in this document, it has this meaning.) Walk Being in Central London, you can of course start or finish the walk wherever Options you like, especially at the main railway stations that are its principal feature.
[Show full text]
List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line
List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line Legend: Page | 1 = Step-free access street to platform = Step-free access street to train This information was correct at time of publication. Please check Transport for London for further information regarding station access. This list was compiled by Benjamin Holt, Transport for All 29/05/2019. Canada Water Step-free access street to train East London line Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Dalston Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Junction - New New Cross Step-free access street to platform Cross Canada Water Step-free access street to platform Clapham High Street Step-free access street to platform Denmark Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Peckham Rye Step-free access street to platform Queens Road Peckham Step-free access street to platform East London line Rotherhithe Step-free access street to platform Shadwell Step-free access street to platform Dalston Canada Water Step-free access street to train Junction - Canonbury Step-free access street to train Clapham Crystal Palace Step-free access street to platform Junction Dalston Junction Step-free access street to train Forest Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to train Highbury & Islington Step-free access street to platform Honor Oak Park Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to train New Cross Gate Step-free access street to platform
[Show full text]
The Environmental Statement
The Environmental Statement The Environmental Statement and this Non-Technical Summary have been prepared by Environmental Resources Management (ERM), on behalf of DLRL. ERM is an independent environmental consultancy with extensive experience of undertaking Environmental Impact Assessments of transport infrastructure schemes. Copies of the Environmental Statement are available for inspection at the following locations: Docklands Light Railway Ltd Canning Town Library PO Box 154, Castor Lane, Poplar, Barking Road, Canning Town, London E14 0DX London E16 4HQ (Opening Hours: 9.00am-5.00pm Mondays to Fridays) (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-5.30pm, Tuesday 9.30am- 5.30pm, Wednesday Closed, Thursday 1.00-8.00pm, Friday London Borough of Newham 9.30am-5.30pm, Saturday 9.30am-5.30pm, Sunday Closed) Environmental Department, 25 Nelson Street, East Ham, London E6 2RP Custom House Library (Opening Hours: 9.00am-5.00pm Mondays to Fridays) Prince Regent Lane, Custom House, London E16 3JJ Bircham Dyson Bell (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-5.30pm, Tuesday 9.30am- Solicitors and Parliamentary Agents, 5.30pm, Wednesday Closed, Thursday 1.00-8.00pm, Friday 50 Broadway, Westminster, London SW1H 0BL Closed, Saturday 9.30am-5.30pm, Sunday Closed) (Opening Hours: 9.30am-5.30pm Mondays to Fridays) North Woolwich Library Hackney Central Library Storey School, Woodman Street¸ Technology and Learning Centre, North Woolwich, London E16 2LS 1 Reading Lane, London E8 1GQ (Opening Hours: Monday 9.30am-1.30pm and 2.30pm-5.30pm, (Opening Hours: Monday 9.00am-8.00pm, Tuesday
[Show full text]
The Basics of Concession Contracts
Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty by MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Tara Naomi Chin Blakey OF TECHNOLOGY B.S., Civil Engineering (2004) ARE62009 University of Florida LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2006 ©2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author............ ... Civil and Environmental Engineering May 26, 2006 Certified by.......................... ............ Prof Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil aid Environmental Engineering - The1 is Supervisor Accepted by.............................................. And? 4. Whittle Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 1 BARKER Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty By Tara Naomi Chin Blakey Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering On May 25, 2006 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT This thesis proposes a performance regime structure for public transit concession contracts, designed so incentives to the concessionaire can be effective given significant uncertainty about the future operating conditions. This is intended to aid agencies in designing regimes that will encourage continually improving performance through the use of relevant and adaptive incentives. The proposed incentives are adjusted annually based on actual circumstances. An adaptive regime can also allow the incentives to be more cost and resource efficient and is especially well-suited to so-called "gross-cost" contracts when the public agency retains the fare revenue and absorbs the revenue risk for the services. The motivation for this research is the anticipated transfer of the oversight responsibilities for the Silverlink Metro regional rail services, in outer London, from the UK Department for Transport to Transport for London.
[Show full text]
Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
[Show full text]
Part 2 of the Bibliography Catalogue
Bibliography - L&NWR Society Periodicals Part 2 Titles - LR to Z excluding Railway Magazine Registered Charity - L&NWRSociety No. 1110210 Copyright LNWR Society 2014 Title Year Volume Page Locomotives & Railways LNWR "Bloomer" Engines 1900 1/1 9 Review of Locomotive building for British Railways during 1899 - LNWR 1900 1/1 10 Mr.J.Ramsbottom's "Lady of the Lake" Class LNWR 1900 1/10 142 Mr. J.Ramsbottom's Lady of the Lake Class LNWR 1900 1/10 142 The North Western "Precedents" 1900 1/2 17 The North Western "Precedents" 1900 1/3 37 The North Western "Precedents" 1900 1/4 40 The North Western "Precedents" 1900 1/4 54 North Staffordshire Goods Engine Four DX Goods Engines recently sold by LNWR 1900 1/8 113 Railway & Locomotive Notes. Accident at Holmes Chapel. 1901 2/03 44 Railway & Locomotive Notes. Continuing list of Jubilee engines. 1901 2/03 45 Advert. Working & Management of an English Railway by Sir George Findlay. 1901 2/03 48 LNWR "Problem" Class 1901 2/19 85 North London Rly. Inside cylinder locomotives 1901 2/21 101 The Britannia Tubular Bridge, North Wales 1901 2/23 123 Outside cylinder tank engines "Metropolitan Railway Type" LNWR 1901 2/24 135 The Britannia Tubular Bridge 1902 3/25 9 The North Western Compound Locomotives 1902 3/27 24 The Britannia Tubular Bridge 1902 3/29 43 4ft 3in 8 Coupled 4 Cylinder Compound Mineral Locomotive LNWR 1902 3/29 47 The North Western Compound Locomotives 1902 3/30 57 The Britannie Tubular Bridge 1902 3/32 44 LNWR 6 Coupled Coal Engines 1902 3/33 90 The Britannia Tubular Bridge 1902 3/35 105 The North Western Compound Locomotives 1902 3/35 107 The Britannia Tubular Bridge 1902 3/36 115 Engraving and notes on McConnell "Patent" Type under the heading Supplement 1903 4/38 18 L&YR 4 Coupled Passenger Engines (LNWR Newtons) 1903 4/39 27 Outside Cylinder Bogie Tank Engines LNWR Metroploitan Tank rebuilds 1903 4/41 49 6 Coupled Saddle Tank Engine LNWR 1903 4/41 52 The North Western Compound Locomotives series not concluded 1903 4/42 61 London Railway Record Ten Years After.
[Show full text]
Barking-Gospel Oak Line User Group
BARKING-GOSPEL OAK LINE USER GROUP www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk RESPONSE TO CROSS-LONDON RUS CONSULTATION Introduction The Barking-Gospel Oak line (BGOL) is one of the few unelectrified routes in an otherwise electrified area. Electrification would be highly desirable, yet it does not feature in the RUS. This is very disappointing, as it would bring a number of advantages: electric-hauled freight trains would be able to use it, and the operator of the Silverlink Metro/North London railway passenger concession would only have one type of rolling stock to maintain. An added advantage is that 3 or 4-car electric units would cope better with increasing passenger loadings than the existing 2-car DMUs, which have difficult coping with peak loadings even now. We believe that without investment in the electrification of the Barking – Gospel Oak Line and other link lines considered in this RUS (Cricklewood to Acton Wells, Acton Wells to Acton Main Line and the Kew Curves) that many of the benefits that this RUS seeks to achieve will not be achievable. We strongly urge Network Rail to upgrade the Felixstowe- Ely – Nuneaton line to the W10 standard loading gauge, so that freight which has no need to pass through London can avoid it altogether and free up much-needed space for additional passenger services and additional freight traffic originating from the planned new Shellhaven development, which is envisaged on both the Barking – Gospel Oak and North London Lines. The same applies to reinstating Cambridge-Bletchley-Bedford. (NB – some existing freight paths on Barking-Gospel Oak have never been used!).
[Show full text]
UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE)
UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE) - 1 - This report was compiled by the OMEGA Centre, University College London. Please Note: This Project Profile has been prepared as part of the ongoing OMEGA Centre of Excellence work on Mega Urban Transport Projects. The information presented in the Profile is essentially a 'work in progress' and will be updated/amended as necessary as work proceeds. Readers are therefore advised to periodically check for any updates or revisions. The Centre and its collaborators/partners have obtained data from sources believed to be reliable and have made every reasonable effort to ensure its accuracy. However, the Centre and its collaborators/partners cannot assume responsibility for errors and omissions in the data nor in the documentation accompanying them. - 2 - CONTENTS A INTRODUCTION Type of Project Location Major Associated Developments Current Status B BACKGROUND TO PROJECT Principal Project Objectives Key Enabling Mechanisms and Timeline of Key Decisions Principal Organisations Involved • Central Government Bodies/Departments • Local Government • London Underground Limited • Olympia & York • The coordinating group • Contractors Planning and Environmental Regime • The JLE Planning Regime • The Environmental Statement • Project Environmental Policy & the Environmental Management System (EMS) • Archaeological Impact Assessment • Public Consultation • Ecological Mitigation • Regeneration Land Acquisition C PRINCIPAL PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Route Description Main Termini and Intermediate Stations • Westminster
[Show full text]
EAST LONDON LINE POST-CLOSURE NOTES – 5 by John Thomason with Contributions from Google Groups, Londonconnectionsblogspot, Mackenzieblu and Anonymous
EAST LONDON LINE POST-CLOSURE NOTES – 5 by John Thomason With contributions from Google Groups, londonconnectionsblogspot, Mackenzieblu and anonymous. Construction News for 12 June reports some information over the final stages of phase one of the East London Railway. The £6.5m Dalston Curve job is up for grabs – what‟s new from the article is that the plan is to put tracks from Whitechapel to Highbury & Islington, but then keep them going to have reversing platforms at Camden Road. This seems to be something new but maybe this has been misreported. Also mentioned is the £100m four-tracking of the North London Line from Stratford to Gospel Oak. Also mentioned is that the line is at capacity on this 11-station section and works include platform lengthening and loops. Funded by DfT, the idea is to run longer [passenger] trains, which are likely to be the 4-car units already ordered by TfL. TfL Board Papers for 25 June record that the first section of new slab track for the East London Line extension was laid on 12 April. It has been reported that the ventilation shafts between Shadwell and Wapping & Rotherhithe and Surrey Quays will be used to pump concrete to track level. The Society received an enquiry from the Her Majesty‟s Railway Inspectorate Link Inspector to the East London Railway Project, concerning two „signal levers‟ found on a „landing platform‟ in a shaft at Rotherhithe. On a „plate‟ at the back of the signal quadrants there appears to be a legend which reads „SD (or B).
[Show full text]
The Transport Economist the Journal of the Transport Economists’ Group
The Transport Economist The Journal of the Transport Economists’ Group 3 Tube 2.5 Tube after 22:00 Bus Night Bus 2 1.5 1 0.5 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Editor Peter Gordon Volume 44 Number 2 Summer 2017 The Transport Economist Volume 44, Number 2 Summer 2017 Contents Pages Implementing London’s Night Tube Mark Curran 1-10 Econometric evidence on vertical Andrew Smith 11-23 integration and the size and & Phil Wheat structure of rail franchises: what can we learn? Land value capture Julian Ware 24-41 TEG Committee 2017-2018 Details of meetings are provided on our website at http://www.transecongroup.org/meetings.htm Implementing London’s Night Tube Mark Curran, Transport for London Arup 26 April 2017 Overview The speaker began by saying that in late 2007 the then Major Ken Livingstone had wished to run trains 30 minutes later, to 01:00 on Friday and Saturday nights, offset with a later start at 06:30 on Saturdays, but that it was not possible to secure the agreement of the infrastructure providers which were then separate companies. It also ran afoul of the contract with train operators. During the 2012 Olympics, however, the system operated for longer hours, and the network coped well, so it was realised that night running might well be feasible. The Access Transformation Programme, which began around 2012, examined reducing the times allowed for engineering. It was felt that these were allowed because they always had been allowed, and were years out of date.
[Show full text]