DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Engineering Report 09/2009 M3 Section: Comrat South to Ciumai

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Engineering Report 09/2009 M3 Section: Comrat South to Ciumai FINAL ENGINEERING REPORT 09/2009 M3 SECTION: COMRAT SOUTH TO CIUMAI VOLUME 1: MAIN TEXT EUROPEAN UNION REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE REHABILITATION AND EXTENSION OF THE ROAD M3 CHISINAU – GIURGIULESTI/ROMANIAN BORDER Europe Aid/125919/C/SER/MD Koblenz, Germany Chisinau, Moldova Road M3 Chisinau — Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Final Engineering Report: Comrat South to Ciumai REPORT COVER PAGE Project Title: Feasibility Study for the Rehabilitation and Extension of the Road M3 Chisinau - Giurgiulesti/Romanian Border Contract Number: 2008/156-690 Countries: Republic of Moldova Name: Local Recipient EC Consultant Republic of Moldova Kocks Consult GmbH & Ministry of Transport / Universinj Ltd State Road Administration Address: Bucuriei Street 12a Chisinau MD 2004 Republic of Moldova Tel. Number: +373 22 595849 +373 22 716655 Fax Number: +373 22 748850 Contact Person: Ulrich Sprick Thomas Herz Project Director Dept. Team Leader Signatures: Date of Report: August 2009 Reporting Period: June 2008 – August 2009 Author of the Kocks Consult GMBH Report: EC M & E team ______________ ______________ _____________ [name] [signature] [date] ÉU Delegation ______________ ______________ _____________ [name] [signature] [date] ______________ ______________ _____________ [name] [signature] [date] Joint Venture Kocks Consult GmbH, Koblenz – Universinj SRL, Chisinau Road M3 Chisinau — Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Final Engineering Report: Comrat South to Ciumai SYNOPSIS Project Title: Feasibility Study for the Rehabilitation and Extension of the Road M3 Chisinau - Giurgiulesti/Romanian Border Project 2008/156-690 Number: Country: Republic of Moldova Project Provide a bankable technical, financial, environmental and institutional feasibility objectives: study for the rehabilitation and extension of the M3 road Chisinau-Giurgiulesti / Romanian Border. Planned • Identification of Transport Needs outputs: • Assessment of technical, environmental, financial and economic feasibility • Assessment of institutional sustainability of the road rehabilitation • Detailed Technical Surveys and Engineering Design • Coordination with International Financial Institutions • Preparation of tender documents for the rehabilitation of one or two priority sections chosen Project • Conduct of traffic surveys and traffic forecasts activities: • Technical assessment of the present infrastructure • Road condition survey • Survey of factual pavement condition • Road safety assessment (black spots) • Road maintenance standards • Present traffic management • A review of the Status of institutional development and policy reforms • Evaluation criteria based on poverty indicators for rural roads and bridges • A socio-economic analysis and environmental and social impact assessment • Cost estimates for infrastructure and maintenance costs • Economic and financial cash flow calculations • Calculation of internal rates of return and net present values • Assessment of Institutional sustainability for carrying out the necessary works and maintenance tasks • Geo-technical and topographic surveys • Soil and Materials Investigations • Preliminary Design • Detailed Drawings • Technical Specifications • Design Report • Tender documents for the rehabilitation of one or two priority sections chosen based on the Feasibility study • Road Maintenance Plan including regular and periodic maintenance • Coordination with IFIs Joint Venture Kocks Consult GmbH, Koblenz – Universinj SRL, Chisinau Road M3 Chisinau — Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Final Engineering Report: Comrat South to Ciumai TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND...................................................................1 1.1 . Country Background.................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ..................................................................................................1 1.3 The Assignment........................................................................................................3 1.4 Sections Recommended for Improvement ................................................................3 2. TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Data Collection ........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Base Year Traffic..................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Traffic Characteristics of the Study Road................................................................. 7 2.4 Traffic Forecasting................................................................................................... 10 2.5 Traffic Forecast Summary........................................................................................ 14 2.6 Road Safety Analysis............................................................................................... 15 2.7 M3 Chisinau – Giurgiulesti Traffic Accident Data ..................................................... 16 2.8 Traffic Accident Patterns.......................................................................................... 17 2.9 General Safety Strategies........................................................................................ 17 3. TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY AND MAPPING.......................................................20 4. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION.......................................................................23 4.1 Geotechnical Overview ..........................................................................................23 4.2 Geotechnical Field Investigations and Laboratory Testing ......................................24 4.3 Evaluation and Recommendation ...........................................................................25 4.4 Construction Material Sources................................................................................26 4.5 Conclusions............................................................................................................27 4.6 Earthworks .............................................................................................................27 4.7 Operations of Borrow Pits ......................................................................................31 5. PAVEMENT CONDITION AND DESIGN................................................................32 5.1 General...................................................................................................................32 5.2 Pavement Rehabilitation Options............................................................................32 5.3 Selection of Rehabilitation Measures......................................................................33 5.4 General Design Principles ......................................................................................34 5.5 Flexible Pavement Design .....................................................................................40 5.6 Recommended Thickness of Pavement Layers ......................................................42 5.7 Pavement Materials ...............................................................................................46 5.8 Road Inventory and Surface Condition ..................................................................52 5.8.1 Road Inventory .......................................................................................................52 5.8.2 Asphalt Pavement Distress.....................................................................................52 5.8.3 Road Roughness....................................................................................................54 6. BRIDGE CONDITION AND DESIGN......................................................................56 6.1 Bridge Design ........................................................................................................56 6.2 Bridges Along the Improvement Sections........................................................................57 6.3 Classification of Existing Bridge Structures.............................................................58 6.4 Culvert and Bridge Field Inventory..........................................................................58 6.5 Bridge Condition.....................................................................................................60 Joint Venture Kocks Consult GmbH, Koblenz – Universinj SRL, Chisinau Road M3 Chisinau — Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Final Engineering Report: Comrat South to Ciumai 6.6 Organization of Improvement Works.......................................................................61 6.7 Monitoring during Operation Period ........................................................................63 7. HYDROLOGICAL AND DRAINAGE DESIGN........................................................65 7.1 Overview ................................................................................................................65 7.2 Carrying Capacity of drainage System....................................................................65 7.3 Location specific Characteristics.............................................................................67 8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT.........................................................70
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A E] Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A
    Strasbourg, 17 September 2001 [PF: CC-Cult/1erBureau/documents/CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A_E] CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL CO-OPERATION CULTURE COMMITTEE Meeting of the Bureau Chisinau, 4 (9.30 a.m.) – 5 (5.00 p.m.) October 2001 (Palais de la République Bâtiment B, 2e étage Str. Nicolai lorga, 21) EUROPEAN PROGRAMME OF NATIONAL CULTURAL POLICY REVIEWS CULTURAL POLICY IN MOLDOVA REPORT OF A EUROPEAN PANEL OF EXAMINERS Item 8 of Draft Agenda Distribution: - Members of the Bureau of the Culture Committee Documents are available for consultation on the Internet page of the cultural co- operation: http://culture.coe.int, username and password: decstest. CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A 1 DRAFT DECISION The Bureau of the CC-Cult : - took note of the experts’ report on the Cultural Policy in Moldova (CC-Cult – BU (2001)2A) and congratulated its authors for its quality; - thanked the Moldovan authorities for their invitation to hold the first meeting of the CC-Cult Bureau in Chisinau on the occasion of the national debate on the cultural policy in Moldova; - is pleased that the MOSAIC II project will contribute to the implementation of the recommendations contained in this report. 2 CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A Membership of the Panel of Examiners Ms France Lebon, Chairperson (Belgium) Directrice, Direction Générale de la Culture, Ministère de la Communauté Francaise - Belgium Ms Maria Berza, (Romania) Formerly State Secretary for Culture – Romania, President Romanian Centre for Cultural Policy and Projects (CERC), vice-President for Romania, Pro Patrimonio Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By
    P a g e | 1 ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument (NEAR) Agreement reference No ENPI/2014/354-587 Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project financed by the European Union Final Report Support to Confidence Building Measures, 15 March 2015-31 December 2018 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 P a g e | 2 Project Title: Support to Confidence Building Measures Starting date: 15 March 2015 Report end date: 31 December 2018 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River ENPI/2014/354-587 Final Report (15 March 2015 - 31 December 2018) – submitted by UNDP Moldova P a g e | 3 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. PROGRESS UPDATE ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. KEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can Moldova Stay on the Road to Europe
    MEMO POL I CY CAN MOLDOVA STAY ON THE ROAD TO EUROPE? Stanislav Secrieru SUMMARY In 2013 Russia hit Moldova hard, imposing Moldova is considered a success story of the European sanctions on wine exports and fuelling Union’s Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative. In the four separatist rumblings in Transnistria and years since a pro-European coalition came to power in 2009, Gagauzia. But 2014 will be much worse. Moldova has become more pluralist and has experienced Russia wants to undermine the one remaining “success story” of the Eastern Partnership robust economic growth. The government has introduced (Georgia being a unique case). It is not clear reforms and has deepened Moldova’s relations with the whether Moldova can rely on Ukraine as a EU, completing a visa-free action plan and initialling an buffer against Russian pressure, which is Association Agreement (AA) with provisions for a Deep and expected to ratchet up sharply after the Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). At the start Sochi Olympics. Russia wants to change the Moldovan government at the elections due in of 2014, Moldova is one step away from progressing into a November 2014, or possibly even sooner; the more complex, more rewarding phase of relations with the Moldovan government wants to sign the key EU. Implementing the association agenda will spur economic EU agreements before then. growth and will multiply linkages with Moldova’s biggest trading partner, the EU. However, Moldova’s progress down Moldova is most fearful of moves against its estimated 300,000 migrant workers in the European path promises to be one of the main focuses Russia, and of existential escalation of the for intrigue in the region in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova's National Minorities: Why Are They Euroskeptical?
    Moldova’s National Minorities: Why are they Euroskeptical? Marcin Kosienkowski William Schreiber November 2014 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-36567-330-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES, BELGIQUE TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection of articles dedicated to the study of Russia and other former Soviet states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarians Print Page Close Window
    World Directory of Minorities Europe MRG Directory –> Moldova –> Bulgarians Print Page Close Window Bulgarians Profile Bulgarians live in the rural south of Moldova; 65,662 according to the 2004 census. Some 79 per cent of Moldovan Bulgarians claim Bulgarian as their first language, and 68 per cent identify Russian as their second language. Historical context Like the Gagauz, Bulgarians arrived in Bessarabia in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries seeking refuge from Ottoman persecution. Bulgarian immigration was also encouraged by co-religionist Russia. Subsequently, many assimilated to Russian culture and the rest became highly Russified. The recorded numbers of Bulgarians in Moldova fell from some 177,000 at the time of the formation of the MASSR in 1940 to 88,000 in 1989. From the late 1980s, Moldovan Bulgarians established links to Bulgaria, and the Bulgarian minority in Moldova has been the subject of bilateral cooperation between Bulgaria and Moldova. In January 1999 Bulgarians in the Moldovan district of Taraclia, where about half of Moldova's Bulgarian population resides, voted in an illegal referendum to protest against proposed administrative boundary changes. The changes would have abolished Taraclia district (a Soviet-era raion) and attached the area to neighbouring Cahul county, in the process transforming the Bulgarian population from a two- thirds local majority to a minority of 16 per cent. The principal fear of local Bulgarians was that they would lose state subsidies for Bulgarian language tuition in the district if they no longer comprised a local majority. The result was a 92 per cent vote against the boundary change, indicating that local Moldovans had voted with the Bulgarian population against the changes, reportedly due to the proposed move of some social services out of Taraclia to Cahul.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Energy II Project Additional Financing (credit no. 4541-MD) Annex VI. Procurement Plan (USD million) 26-May-10 Contract Award (Contractor, Tender Procurem Contract completion Type of Bidding documents Country) Package Description Contracts ent Bid Opening Contract signing contract issued to bidders Method Finalization of Contract installation finalization 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 B. HEATING SUPPLY AND EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT (heating component extension) Supply and installation of boiler plants, distribution systems, substations, IHS and DHW systems for the District Hospitals Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Consortium led by Romany Gaz B8.1 Ocnita District Hospital 13-Feb-09 5-May-09 9-Sep-09 15-Oct-10 Dec-10 B8 S&I 3 ICB Group, Moldova Consortium led by Polimer Gaz B8.2 Drochia District Hospital 13-Feb-09 5-May-09 9-Sep-09 15-Oct-10 Dec-10 Conducte , Moldova Consortium led by Romany Gaz B8.3 Orhei District Hospital (interdistrict perinatological center) 13-Feb-09 5-May-09 9-Sep-09 15-Oct-10 Dec-10 Group, Moldova Supply and installation of boiler plants, distribution systems, substations, IHS and DHW systems for the objects of the Drochia, Soldanesti and Cimislia District Councils Lyceums "Stefan cel Mare" and "Boiarnitschii", Kindergartens no. 5 and no. Consortium led by Laiola, B9.1 24-Jul-09 22-Sep-09 28-Oct-09 15-Oct-10 Dec-10 B9 9, city of Drochia S&I 3 ICB Moldova Consortium led by Polimer Gaz B9.3 Lyceum "A. Mateevici", city of Soldanesti 24-Jul-09 22-Sep-09 28-Oct-09 15-Oct-10 Dec-10 Conducte, Moldova Consortium led by Polimer Gaz B9.4 Lyceum "M.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights – Data As Reported by National Authorities Data As at 10/05/2021, 18:00 P.M., Unless Stated Otherwise
    Coronavirus Disease - COVID 19 Weekly Situation Report No. 55 (11 May 2021) This report is produced by UN Moldova in collaboration with Government and development/humanitarian partners. The UN is producing weekly epidemiological updates followed by monthly detailed programme updates. All past sitreps can be accessed here Highlights – data as reported by national authorities Data as at 10/05/2021, 18:00 p.m., unless stated otherwise. The total number of COVID‐19 cases in the country has The number of new cases has decreased over continued to increase, albeit at a slower pace than in the last week and reached a 7‐day average of the previous two months, and on May 9, the total 202 on May 9 compared to 314 for the number of cases reached 252,749. An additional 49 preceding week. cases were registered on May 10. The number of active cases has decreased in the past The 7‐day average for the number of deaths has week. As of May 9, the number of active cases stood slightly increased and stands at 16, compared to 15 in at 3,263 which decreased to 3,109 on the first day of the week prior. The total number of deaths as of May the new week. 9 was 5,952 and six additional deaths were registered on May 10. United Nations in the Republic of Moldova Republic of Moldova Covid-19 Weekly Situation Report No. 55 | 2 The average number of very serious cases has Overall, fifty‐nine percent of all cases have been decreased and as of May 9 it stood at 185.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections in the Republic of Moldova (20 October 2019)
    STATUTORY FORUM Report CG-FORUM(2020)01-04 28 September 2020 Local elections in the Republic of Moldova (20 October 2019) Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the European Charter of Local Self-Government (Monitoring Committee) Rapporteur:1 Vladimir PREBILIC, Slovenia (L, SOC/G/PD) Recommendation 443 (2020).................................................................................................................. 3 Explanatory memorandum ...................................................................................................................... 5 Summary Following an invitation of the authorities of the Republic of Moldova, the Congress carried out a mission to observe the local elections in the country on 20 October 2019. Prior to the main mission, a reduced Congress Delegation visited Chisinau from 2 to 4 October to carry out a pre-electoral visit. The Delegation to observe the 20 October local elections was deployed from 17 to 21 October 2019 and involved 24 observers from 21 European countries. On the Election Day, the Delegation was divided into eleven teams, which visited some 200 polling stations across the country and observed the voting as well as the counting process. Technically, the elections were well prepared and administered by an overall experienced electoral staff at the level of the polling stations. The Congress welcomes some of the efforts made by the Moldovan authorities to improve the legal framework for elections, in particular amendments aiming at a better regulation of financing of political parties and regulation of campaign activities. However, the changes were introduced close to the Election Day and implemented in a very tight timeframe, increasing pressure on electoral bodies and generating uncertainty among candidates and citizens. Despite some positive changes, the Congress expresses its concern about the overly burdensome registration requirements for independent candidates compared to the candidates from political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Medicilor De Familie Care Au Trecut Instruirea În Planificarea Familială
    LISTA MEDICILOR DE FAMILIE CARE AU TRECUT INSTRUIREA ÎN PLANIFICAREA FAMILIALĂ Instituția medical Nume, prenume Funcția e-mail Telefon 1. CMF Anenii Noi Rodica Damilin 069494307 2. IMSP CMF Florești Emilia Chefu [email protected] 068540066 3. IMSP CMF Florești Svetlana Rusu [email protected] 069003953 4. IMSP CMF Hîrboveț Simion Roșior [email protected] 068217796 5. IMSP CMF Rezina Silvia Popov șef [email protected] 068822997 6. IMSP CS Anenii Noi Elena Vizdan [email protected] 079217400 7. IMSP CS Anenii Noi Lidia Mațarina [email protected] 026523347 8. IMSP CS Anenii Noi Nelli Buruian șef [email protected] 069201915 9. IMSP CS Antonești Ivana Sîrbu [email protected] 068426655 10. IMSP CS Avdarma Natalia Caramit șef [email protected] 06302565 11. IMSP CS Bădiceni Ion Baranov [email protected] 069028875 12. IMSP CS Baimaclia Elena Olteanu [email protected] 067601301 13. IMSP CS Bălanesti Ana Vidrașcu mf [email protected] 068550088 14. IMSP CS Balatina Nina Gonta șef [email protected] 024941316 15. IMSP CS Bardar Margareta Luchița șef [email protected] 026838048 16. IMSP CS Basarabeasca Maria Beșleaga [email protected] 029720524 17. IMSP CS Basarabeasca Veronica Oprea [email protected] 029751692 18. IMSP CS Bașcalia Vladimir Diacov [email protected] 19. IMSP CS Bilicenii Vechi Emil Melnic mf [email protected] 069706604 20. IMSP CS Biruința Gheorghe Ojog [email protected] 026260346 21. IMSP CS Bocșa Valeriu Boboc sef [email protected] 079728238 22. IMSP CS Bravicea Mihai Tanase șef [email protected] 624434273 23.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Jews from Leova Interned in the Cahul Camp
    List of Jews from Leova Interned in Cahul Camp July 22, 1941 Introduction by Joel Waters In memory of Liba Vasserman, my Great Grandmother, who died in Cahul along with many of her neighbors. Background: Following the June 22, 1941 Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union the Germans moved quickly across Bessarabia and Bucovina into Ukraine, leaving control of these two former Romanian territories to Romanian Prime Minister, Ion Antonescu. Antonescu was intent on cleansing his land of the Jews, and in late July 1941 started assembling the Jews into transit camps in preparation for their eventual deportation across the Dneister River. Of course, many Jews were killed along the way, or died in the transit camps of hunger, exposure, and disease. By October 8, 1941 when Ion Antonescu ordered the deportation of all Jews from Bessarabia and Bucovina on more than half of the Jewish population of Bessarabia had already perished. The survivors were sent across the Dneister river into Transnistria. Database: This list is transcribed from a document entitled “List of Jews from Leova interned in Cahul Camp” obtained from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, in Washington D.C. The original source of this document is the Moldovan State Archives in Chisinau, Moldova. Acknowledgments: Special thanks to Michlean Amir – USHMM Reference Archivist for her assistance in acquiring this document. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Name Lists Catalog Search -- Search Results Original Language Title: Tabel de evrei din Leova îternaţi în lagărul Cahul. Language: Romanian Title in English: List of Jews from Leova, interned in Cahul camp. Place(s): Cahul (Place of Persecution) Leova (Previous Location) Organization/Battalion Name: Lagarul Cahul Nationality - Persecution Status: Romanian - J or JU / Jude / Jew Gender: Male and Female Type of List: Concentration camp Date: Notes: List indicates age, prewar, profession, and gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the Report Of
    CPT/Inf (2021) 6 Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to the Republic of Moldova from 28 January to 7 February 2020 Since April 2011, reports on CPT visits to the Republic of Moldova and related Government responses are published under an automatic publication procedure. The CPT’s report on the January/February 2020 visit to the Republic of Moldova is set out in document CPT/Inf (2020) 27. Strasbourg, 14 April 2021 Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the Report of the delegation of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to the Republic of Moldova The Government of the Republic of Moldova highly appreciates the work of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (hereinafter – CPT) on improving the standards for the functioning of state institutions where persons are deprived of their liberty. The Government of the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter – RM) expresses its readiness to comply, as far as possible, with the comments contained in the CPT Report on the visit1, and to take all necessary measures to remedy the deficiencies. The Government remains committed to focus on increasing the quality of services provided to persons placed under the state custody, so as to protect their rights, as well as to provide improved rehabilitation opportunities for each detainee.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions And
    Strasbourg, 8 June 2018 CDL-PI(2018)004 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMPILATION OF VENICE COMMISSION OPINIONS AND REPORTS CONCERNING THRESHOLDS WHICH BAR PARTIES FROM ACCESS TO PARLIAMENT1 1 This document will be updated regularly. This version contains all opinions and reports adopted up to and including the Venice Commission’s 114th Plenary Session (16-17 March 2018) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-PI(2018)004 - 2 - I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 II. General remarks ........................................................................................................... 4 III. The choice of an electoral system ................................................................................. 4 IV. Different types of thresholds .......................................................................................... 6 A. The legal threshold ......................................................................................... 6 1. The level of the legal threshold .................................................................................. 6 a. The calculation of the legal threshold ............................................................. 9 b. Undesirable effects....................................................................................... 10 2. The legal thresholds: specific features ....................................................................
    [Show full text]