DOCSLIB.ORG

Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the Report Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CPT/Inf (2021) 6 Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to the Republic of Moldova from 28 January to 7 February 2020 Since April 2011, reports on CPT visits to the Republic of Moldova and related Government responses are published under an automatic publication procedure. The CPT’s report on the January/February 2020 visit to the Republic of Moldova is set out in document CPT/Inf (2020) 27. Strasbourg, 14 April 2021 Response of the Government of the Republic of Moldova to the Report of the delegation of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to the Republic of Moldova The Government of the Republic of Moldova highly appreciates the work of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (hereinafter – CPT) on improving the standards for the functioning of state institutions where persons are deprived of their liberty. The Government of the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter – RM) expresses its readiness to comply, as far as possible, with the comments contained in the CPT Report on the visit1, and to take all necessary measures to remedy the deficiencies. The Government remains committed to focus on increasing the quality of services provided to persons placed under the state custody, so as to protect their rights, as well as to provide improved rehabilitation opportunities for each detainee. The present Response was drafted by the Ministry of Justice based on the information provided by the authorities responsible for implementing the observations, namely the Ministry of Internal Affairs (hereinafter - MIA), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Social Protection (hereinafter - MHLSP) and the National Penitentiary Administration (hereinafter - NPA). Following the detailed examination of the Report of the CPT delegation after the ordinary monitoring visit to the Republic of Moldova, held between January 28 and February 7, 2020, the Government is pleased to provide the information on the measures taken and the recent developments directed at the elimination of the deficiencies identified by the CPT. The police Detention period In accordance with the normative acts of the police, for the placement of the detained person in the Temporary Detention Isolator (TDI), the respective person must be accompanied by an individual file, drawn up under the conditions of art. 201 and 307 of the Enforcement Code No. 443/2004. At the same time, in order not to admit the exceeding of the 72-hour detention period in TDI of persons whose identity documents are not completed, the subordinated subdivisions of the General Police Inspectorate (GPI) were warned about not admitting gaps in the individual files of persons in police custody presented for placement in TDI. It should be noted that the delays in issuing identity documents by the Public Services Agency for persons in police custody persists, especially if the person has never previously been issued an identity document and / or has not been assigned a state identification number. In this sense, the authorities are examining the possibility of modifying the normative framework, mainly the Law No. 273/1994 on identity documents in the national passport system and the Enforcement Code. 1 Adopted by CPT at its 102nd meeting and published on 15 September 2020. 2 Ill-treatment During the monitoring visit, the CPT delegation was informed about the introduction of Standard Operating Procedures approved for the implementation of Objective 1 of the Action Plan on Reducing ill-treatment, abuse and discrimination towards persons in Police Custody for the years 2017-2020, approved by Government Decision No. 748/2017. Thus, the following Standard Operating Procedures were approved: Standard Operating Procedures regarding the detention, escort, transportation and placement of the detained person in the Temporary Detention Isolator of the Police, approved by Order of the Head of GPI No.129 of 27.04.2020; Standard Operating Procedures on the mechanism of providing medical assistance to persons detained and in pre-trial detention, approved by Order of the Head of GPI No. 444 of 15.09.2019; Standard Operating Procedures regarding the assurance of the right to an interpreter or translator for persons detained, transported, escorted and detained in pretrial detention facilities, approved by Order of the Head of GPI No. 797 of 10.12.2019. The procedure for identifying, registering and reporting the alleged cases of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, is regulated by the Regulation approved by Joint Order No. 77/572/408/639- o / 197/1389 of 31.12.2013 of the General Prosecutor, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Internal Affairs, the Customs Service, the National Anticorruption Center and the Minister of Health. In order to ensure respect for the rights of persons at the detention stage and to prevent cases of torture and ill-treatment, as well as to ensure the level of professional training of police officers, multiple training activities were organized during the year 2020. On 16.09.2020, within the GPI, took place the launching event of the Human Rights Guide for Police and Standard Operating Procedures, developed with the support of the “Soros-Moldova” Foundation within the project “Promoting Police activity based on human rights in Republic of Moldova". Regarding the situation of excessively tight handcuffs, invoked by the CPT, please note that the handcuffs that are currently in police’s equipment are of the chain type, which easily allows the handcuffed person to tighten them more intensely causing intentional trauma. The police, following the last undertaken study visits, concluded that the application of padlock handcuffs by its counterparts in other states reduces the risk of injury, compared to chain-type ones. In these circumstances, it was proposed to gradually replace the handcuffs in the police units. At the same time, within the GPI, the departmental regulation on application of handcuffs was elaborated for not admitting their excessively tight application during the detention and escort of persons. Within the MIA, the Working Group was created in order to achieve the objective “Analysis and consolidation of the reaction capacity of the institutions subordinated to the MIA in specific situations”, which also aims to regulate the issue of handcuff application. The WG initiated the process of reviewing the institutional normative acts, in order to establish additional regulations to reduce the cases invoked. At the same time, as regards the application of handcuffs during the extradition procedures from other states to the Republic of Moldova of persons wanted by national 3 law enforcement bodies, this is done only in cases where the subject presents a clear danger to maintaining public order and security, in accordance with the relevant provisions of national and international treaties. Regarding efforts to combat ill-treatment of detainees by police officers, by approving the Standard Operating Procedures for the detention, escort, transportation and placement of the detained person in the TDI2 and the Standard Operating Procedure on the medical assistance to the persons detained in pre-trial detention, the objective is to ensure the organization and observance of the conditions compatible with the respect for the human dignity of the persons in police custody. Thus, it is mandatory that the manner and method of execution of the measure is not subject to stress or difficulties exceeding the inevitable level of suffering related to detention. Based on the practical needs of detention, medical care is provided in an appropriate manner and according to the health needs of the detained person. According to the procedure, the person in respect of whom the physical force, special means or firearm was applied during the detention or declared that he was subjected to intimidation, pressure, physical or mental aggression by the police, and not only, is to be examined immediately. When bodily injuries are ascertained by TDI medical personnel, these findings are recorded in the Body Injury Examination Form and subsequently in the Register of evidence of receipt and transmission of complaints, statements or other information about alleged acts of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, with transmission of information within a maximum of 24 hours to the prosecutor, in the established manner. At the same time, within the territorial subdivisions of the Police, alleged acts of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment are managed by the Guard Services, and in the case of the activity of employees in offices that do not have 24/24 hours program, the police officer who during working hours has become aware of the fact of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, is to ensure the presentation of the injured party/ petitioner to the nearest police subdivision or to inform its Guard Service by telephone in accessible ways. The duty officer who has received the relevant information related to the reported case is obliged to enter it in the Register and to inform the service prosecutor by telephone, after which immediately, but not later than 24 hours, to ensure the transmission of the materials prepared to the territorial or specialized prosecutor's office, within whose radius the institution operates. This obligation is valid whenever police officers receive information about the application of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, regardless of the source, including the media. Upon notification of the specialized police subdivision, the Prosecutor's Office is immediately informed about the ill-treatment of the police officers according to the provisions of the Regulation on the procedure for identifying, registering and reporting alleged cases of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, approved by Joint Order No. 77 / 572 / 408 / 639-o / 197/1389 of December 31, 2013.
Recommended publications
  • „Paynet Services” SRL Care Au Dreptul De a Presta Servicii De Plată

    „Paynet Services” SRL Care Au Dreptul De a Presta Servicii De Plată

    Sucursalele/ agenții de plată ai „Paynet Services” SRL care au dreptul de a presta servicii de plată Numărul și data de eliberare a copiei Informații privind autorizate de pe Administratorii radierea și încetarea Denumirea, sediul licență sucursalei/ activității sucursalei/agentului de plată pentru agentului de plată sucursalei/ agentului sucursala/data de plată înscrierii agentului de plată 1 2 3 4 Sucursale: - - - - Agenți de plată: 1. „PayPoint” SRL, MD-2004, bd. Ştefan cel Mare și Sfînt, 196, mun. 09.12.2014 23.05.2016 Chişinău, Republica Moldova Erarslan Kazim 2. S.C. „MMPS COM” SRL, MD- 2001, bd. Ștefan cel Mare și Sfînt, 13.03.2015 - 3/A, mun. Chişinău, Republica Bambuleac Moldova Valentin 3. Î.M. „QIWI-M” SRL, MD-2059, str. Petricani, 32, mun. Chişinău, 13.03.2015 - Republica Moldova Ciobanu Victor 4. „Paymaster” SRL, MD-2001, str. Aleea Gării, 42, mun. Chişinău, 16.03.2015 - Republica Moldova Lupolov Denis 5. „Smart Energy Solutions” SRL, MD-2071, str. Alba-Iulia, 196/1, ap. 27.03.2015 29.11.2016 (of.) 159, mun. Chişinău, Republica Alexei Serghei Moldova 6. „Trion GSM” SRL, MD-3901, str. 31 August, 23, ap. (of.) 67, mun. 01.04.2015 - Cahul, Republica Moldova Mocanu Leonid 7. S.C. „Visoprim” SRL, MD-3601, str. Nicolae Iorga, 23, or. Ungheni, 06.04.2015 - Republica Moldova Soltan Iurie Adresa: Bulevardul Grigore Vieru nr.1, MD-2005, Chişinău, Republica Moldova Tel: (+373) 22 226 374, Fax (+373) 22 220 591, email: [email protected] Web: www.bnm.md 8. Î.C.S. „Access Point” SRL, MD- 2009, str. Nucarilor, 27, mun.
  • Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A E] Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A

    Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A E] Cc-Cult-Bu(2001)2A

    Strasbourg, 17 September 2001 [PF: CC-Cult/1erBureau/documents/CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A_E] CC-CULT-BU(2001)2A COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL CO-OPERATION CULTURE COMMITTEE Meeting of the Bureau Chisinau, 4 (9.30 a.m.) – 5 (5.00 p.m.) October 2001 (Palais de la République Bâtiment B, 2e étage Str. Nicolai lorga, 21) EUROPEAN PROGRAMME OF NATIONAL CULTURAL POLICY REVIEWS CULTURAL POLICY IN MOLDOVA REPORT OF A EUROPEAN PANEL OF EXAMINERS Item 8 of Draft Agenda Distribution: - Members of the Bureau of the Culture Committee Documents are available for consultation on the Internet page of the cultural co- operation: http://culture.coe.int, username and password: decstest. CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A 1 DRAFT DECISION The Bureau of the CC-Cult : - took note of the experts’ report on the Cultural Policy in Moldova (CC-Cult – BU (2001)2A) and congratulated its authors for its quality; - thanked the Moldovan authorities for their invitation to hold the first meeting of the CC-Cult Bureau in Chisinau on the occasion of the national debate on the cultural policy in Moldova; - is pleased that the MOSAIC II project will contribute to the implementation of the recommendations contained in this report. 2 CC-CULT-BU (2001) 2A Membership of the Panel of Examiners Ms France Lebon, Chairperson (Belgium) Directrice, Direction Générale de la Culture, Ministère de la Communauté Francaise - Belgium Ms Maria Berza, (Romania) Formerly State Secretary for Culture – Romania, President Romanian Centre for Cultural Policy and Projects (CERC), vice-President for Romania, Pro Patrimonio Foundation
  • Jewish Heritage Sites and Monuments in Moldova

    Jewish Heritage Sites and Monuments in Moldova

    JEWISH HERITAGE SITES AND MONUMENTS IN MOLDOVA United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2010 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Linda L. Addison Michael B. Levy New York, NY Washington, DC Ned W. Bandler Rachmiel Liberman Bridgewater, CT Brookline, MA Ronald H. Bloom Harley Lippman Beverly Hills, CA New York, NY William C. Daroff Michael Menis Washington, DC Inverness, IL Tyrone C. Fahner Larry Pressler Evanston, IL Washington, DC Emil Fish Jonathan J. Rikoon Pasadena, CA Far Rockaway, NY Jules Fleischer Harriet Rotter Brooklyn, NY Bingham Farms, MI Martin B. Gold Lee R. Seeman Washington, DC Great Neck, NY Peter Hawryluk Lawrence E. Steinberg Zionsville, IN Dallas, TX Andrew M. Klein Robert Zarnegin Parkland, FL Beverly Hills, CA 1400 K Street, N.W., Suite 401 Washington, DC 20005 Tel.: (202) 254-3824, Fax: (202) 254-3934 [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 1 How to Use This Report ....................................................................................................... 2 Jewish Monuments in Moldova ......................................................................................... 6 Table of Sites Identified and Visited by Survey ........................................................... 9 Jewish and Holocaust Sites in Moldova ......................................................................
  • Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By

    Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By

    P a g e | 1 ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument (NEAR) Agreement reference No ENPI/2014/354-587 Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project financed by the European Union Final Report Support to Confidence Building Measures, 15 March 2015-31 December 2018 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 P a g e | 2 Project Title: Support to Confidence Building Measures Starting date: 15 March 2015 Report end date: 31 December 2018 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River ENPI/2014/354-587 Final Report (15 March 2015 - 31 December 2018) – submitted by UNDP Moldova P a g e | 3 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. PROGRESS UPDATE ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. KEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................
  • Can Moldova Stay on the Road to Europe

    Can Moldova Stay on the Road to Europe

    MEMO POL I CY CAN MOLDOVA STAY ON THE ROAD TO EUROPE? Stanislav Secrieru SUMMARY In 2013 Russia hit Moldova hard, imposing Moldova is considered a success story of the European sanctions on wine exports and fuelling Union’s Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative. In the four separatist rumblings in Transnistria and years since a pro-European coalition came to power in 2009, Gagauzia. But 2014 will be much worse. Moldova has become more pluralist and has experienced Russia wants to undermine the one remaining “success story” of the Eastern Partnership robust economic growth. The government has introduced (Georgia being a unique case). It is not clear reforms and has deepened Moldova’s relations with the whether Moldova can rely on Ukraine as a EU, completing a visa-free action plan and initialling an buffer against Russian pressure, which is Association Agreement (AA) with provisions for a Deep and expected to ratchet up sharply after the Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). At the start Sochi Olympics. Russia wants to change the Moldovan government at the elections due in of 2014, Moldova is one step away from progressing into a November 2014, or possibly even sooner; the more complex, more rewarding phase of relations with the Moldovan government wants to sign the key EU. Implementing the association agenda will spur economic EU agreements before then. growth and will multiply linkages with Moldova’s biggest trading partner, the EU. However, Moldova’s progress down Moldova is most fearful of moves against its estimated 300,000 migrant workers in the European path promises to be one of the main focuses Russia, and of existential escalation of the for intrigue in the region in 2014.
  • Coe/EU Eastern Partnership Programmatic

    Coe/EU Eastern Partnership Programmatic

    CoE/EU Eastern Partnership Programmatic Co-operation Framework (PCF) 2015-2017 Project on “Strengthening the efficiency, professionalism and accountability of the judiciary in the Republic of Moldova” Launching of the court coaching programme on implementation of CEPEJ tools in the pilot courts of the Republic of Moldova LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Date: 04 September 2015, 10:00 – 17:00 Venue: Complexul turistic “Vatra”, or. Vadul-lui-Vodă, Parcul Nistrean Name, Surname, Title 1. Mr Jose-Luis Herrero, Head of Council of Europe in Chisinau 2. Mr Leonid Antohi, Project Coordinator, Council of Europe 3. Mr Ivan Crnčec, CEPEJ member (Croatia) 4. Mr Frans Van Der Doelen, CEPEJ member (The Netherlands) 5. Mr Fotis Karayannopoulos, Lawyer, CEPEJ expert (Greece) 6. Mr Jaša Vrabec, National Correspondent to the CEPEJ (Slovenia) 7. Mr Ruslan Grebencea, Senior Project Officer, Council of Europe in Chisinau 8. Mr Dumitru Visterniceanu, Superior Council of Magistracy 9. Mrs Palanciuc Victoria, Administration of courts Division, Ministry of Justice 10. Mrs Vitu Natalia, Head of judicial statistics service within the Department of Justice Administration, Ministry of Justice 11. Ms Lilia Grimalschi, Head of Department of analysis and enforcement of ECtHR Judgments, Ministry of Justice 12. Mr Oleg Melniciuc, President of Riscani District Court 13. Mrs Zinaida Dumitrasco, Head of the Secretariat, Riscani District Court, mun. Chisinau 14. Mrs Mocan Natalia, Head of generalization and systematization of judicial practice Service, Riscani District Court 15. Ms Eugenia Parfeni, Head of Department for systematization, generalization of judicial practice and PR, Riscani District Court 16. Mr Dvurecenschii Evghenii, judge, Cahul Court of Appeal 17. Mrs Hantea Svetlana, Head of Secretariat, Cahul Court of Appeal 18.
  • Lista Birourilor De Schimb Valutar Ale Băncilor Licenţiate Care Efectuează Operaţiuni De Schimb Valutar În Numerar Cu Pers

    Lista Birourilor De Schimb Valutar Ale Băncilor Licenţiate Care Efectuează Operaţiuni De Schimb Valutar În Numerar Cu Pers

    Pagina 1 din 34 Lista birourilor de schimb valutar ale băncilor licenţiate care efectuează operaţiuni de schimb valutar în numerar cu persoane fizice pe teritoriul Republicii Moldovei la data de 01.02.2021 nr. Denumirea subdiviziunii separate Sediul subdiviziunii separate a băncii Denumirea băncii licenţiate Telefon d/o a băncii licenţiate licenţiate B.C. "Moldindconbank" S.A. 1. (022) 426-223; 426-224; B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Stabil" mun. Chişinău, bd. Mircea cel Bătrîn, 2 426-225 2. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.15 a Sucursalei "Stabil" mun. Chişinău, bd. Mircea cel Bătrîn, 12/2 (022) 426-228 3. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.80 a Sucursalei "Stabil" r. Dubăsari, s. Coşniţa (0248) 25-501; 25-502 4. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.25 a Sucursalei "Kiev" mun. Chişinău, str. Bogdan Voievod, 1/1 (022) 498-667 5. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Kiev" mun. Chişinău, str. Kiev, 9/1 (022) 311-073 6. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Negruzzi" mun. Chişinău, bd. Ștefan cel Mare și Sfânt, 6 (022) 272-930; 272-807 7. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.51 a Sucursalei mun. Chişinău, bd. Negruzzi, 4/2 (022) 271-292 "Negruzzi" 8. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Sucursala "Testemiţeanu" mun. Chişinău, str.Testemiţanu, 22 (022) 731-682; 224-316 9. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. Agenţia nr.60 a Sucursalei mun. Chişinău, str. Testemiţanu, 29 (022) 287-354 "Testemiţeanu" 10. B.C. ”Moldindconbank” S.A. (022) 630-886; 630- Sucursala "Alba-Iulia" mun. Chişinău, str. Alba Iulia, 77/19 887; 630-888 11.
  • Moldova's National Minorities: Why Are They Euroskeptical?

    Moldova's National Minorities: Why Are They Euroskeptical?

    Moldova’s National Minorities: Why are they Euroskeptical? Marcin Kosienkowski William Schreiber November 2014 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-36567-330-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES, BELGIQUE TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection of articles dedicated to the study of Russia and other former Soviet states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues.
  • Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016

    Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016

    Environmental Protection of International River Basins This project is implemented by a Consortium led by Hulla and Co. (EPIRB) HumanDynamics KG Contract No 2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi Project Funded by Ministry of Environment the European Union DRAFT THE PRUT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 - 2021 Prepared in alignment to the EuropeanWater Framework Directive2000/60/EC Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau, 2015 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.General description of the Prut River Basin ................................................................................. 7 1.1. Natural conditions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Climate and vegetation................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2. Geological structure and geomorphology ....................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Surface water resources.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.3.1. Rivers .............................................................................................................................
  • Local Employment Partnership Cahul District

    Local Employment Partnership Cahul District

    LOCAL EMPLOYMENT PARTNERSHIP CAHUL DISTRICT Cover photos: © Claudio Hirschberger, Christopher Campbell Interior photos: p.9 © Chevanon Photography, p. 12 © Mabel Amber LOCAL EMPLOYMENT PARTNERSHIP CAHUL DISTRICT Cahul, Moldova 2019 PROMOTION OF YOUTH EMPLOYMENT | INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document summarises the main interventions that will take place within the framework of the Local Employment Partnership of Cahul District (hereinafter LEP Cahul). The LEP Cahul has brought together a number of public and private institutions in the Cahul district to improve the situation on the local labour market and identify concrete entry-points for the creation of jobs or the formalisation of existing ones. Preparation of this LEP has been led by the Territorial Commission for Consultation and Collective Bargaining in Cahul, which has facilitated dialogue among national and local stakeholders and has provided continuous input into the eight-month long consultation process. Ms Vrabie Violeta, ILO Project Coordinator, carried out the territorial audit in 2018 and has consolidated all inputs in one coherent document, in collaboration with Mr Vitalie Ponomariov, LEP facilitator in Cahul. We would like to acknowledge the technical guidance provided by Ms Daniela Zampini, ILO Employment Specialist, and the support of Ms. Sajmira Kopani in finalizing the document. We would also like to express our gratitude to: Mr Vald Casuneanu, Vice-president of Cahul District Council for steering and promoting LEP Cahul
  • Progress Report for 2009

    Progress Report for 2009

    Contract number: 2009/219-955 Project Title: Building confidence between Chisinau and Tiraspol Report starting date: 01 January 2010 Report end date: 31 December 2011 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Support to Confidence Building Measures II – Final Report 2010-2011 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4. SUPPORT TO CREATION OF DNIESTER EUROREGION AND RESTORATION OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC. ........................................... 7 IV. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .........................................................................................
  • C:\Users\CRK\Documents\Working Files\Moldova Fulbright\PDO

    C:\Users\CRK\Documents\Working Files\Moldova Fulbright\PDO

    Fulbright Pre-Departure Orientation July 20 -22, 20ll PDO Guide to Moldova The information in this Guide was contributed by Fulbrighters who were in Moldova during the 2010-2011 grant cycle; namely, Malina Dumas, Melissa McDonald, Rebecca Ruck, Rod Garnett, Matthew Rellaford, Frank McCarty, Christopher Kelley, and Robert Czerniak. Contents I. Introduction . 2 II. Housing . 2 III. Safety . 8 IV. Attire . 9 V. Money . .14 VI. Medicine, Cosmetics, and Other Personal Items . .16 VII. Food . 18 VIII. International Mail . 20 IX. Internet Access and Mobile Phones . .21 X. Transportation . .23 XI. Recreation . 25 XII. Language and Language Learning . 26 XIII. Teaching . .27 XIV. Research . .. 30 XV. Gifts and Academic and Event Certificates . 32 XVI. Toasts and Alcohol . 32 XVII. Books, Monographs, and Other Resources about Moldova . 33 XVIII. Miscellaneous . 33 XIX. Contributor Email Addresses . .34 I. Introduction You are almost certain to enjoy your stay in Moldova. Most Fulbrighters have been appreciated by Moldovans, and most Fulbrighters have appreciated and enjoyed their stay in Moldova. Of course, each Fulbrighter experiences Moldova differently. The reasons for this vary. Location is one reason. Living in Chisinau is different than living in a smaller city. This Guide cannot take into account all of the variables or even most of them. It does not try to. Instead, it more modestly offers basic, broadly applicable information and suggestions. We hope this information and these suggestions help you. If the information you are seeking is not here, note your question on a margin of this Guide and ask it at the Pre- Departure Orientation. By giving you this Guide in advance of the PDO, we hope to make the PDO as effective and efficient as possible.