DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2105.05317V3 [Math.NT] 18 Jun 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2105.05317V3 [Math.NT] 18 Jun 2021 A Direct Proof of the Prime Number Theorem using Riemann’s Prime-counting Function Zihao Liu International Department, The Affiliated High School of SCNU E-mail: travor [email protected] Abstract. In this paper, we develop a novel analytic method to prove the prime number theorem in de la Vall´ee Poussin’s form: c√log x π(x) = li(x)+ (xe− ) O Instead of performing asymptotic expansion on Chebyshev functions as in conventional analytic methods, this new approach uses contour-integration method to analyze Riemann’s prime counting function J(x), which only differs from π(x) by (√x log log x/ log x). O 1. Introduction The prime number theorem[1][3] has been a popular topic in analytic number theory since the 19th century. Its first proofs were independently given by Hadamard and de la Vall´ee Poussin in 1896 [13] using analytic methods. Since then, mathematicians such as Apostol [1], Levinson [5], Newman [9][7], Selberg [10], Stein [11], and Wright [14] have explored different approaches (e.g. elementary methods, Tauberian theorems, and contour integrations) to prove this theorem. Instead of analyzing π(x) directly, present proofs, regardless elementary or analytic, first attacked either of the Chebyshev functions ϑ(x)= log p (1) p x arXiv:2105.05317v3 [math.NT] 18 Jun 2021 X≤ ψ(x)= Λ(n)= ϑ(x1/k) (2) n x k log x X≤ ≤X2 to derive asymptotic formulae, and estimates for π(x) were later obtained using elementary methods, such as partial summation, to ϑ(x). Although Landau [1][4] derived the prime number theorem by proving 1 lim µ(n) = 0 (3) x x →∞ n x X≤ µ(n) lim = 0 (4) x n →∞ n x X≤ he still justified the equivalence of (3) and (4) to the prime number theorem with Chebyshev functions. Hence, it is an interesting task to investigate a method that avoids the use of (1) and (2). In this paper, we propose a proof of the prime number theorem that avoids the use of Chebyshev functions. In particular, we first introduce Riemann’s prime counting function J(x) to our problem and relate it to π(x). Then, by inverse Mellin transform, an integral representation is obtained for π(x). In the subsequent part of this paper, we evaluate the contour integral and obtain the prime number theorem in the version of de la Vall´ee Poussin. That is, there exists a positive constant c such that c√log x π(x) = li(x)+ (xe− ) (5) O where li(x) is the logarithmic integral: 1 ε x dt li(x) = lim − + (6) ε 0+ log t → Z0 Z1+ε In essence, the main contribution of this paper is a new proof of the prime number theorem. The significance of this proof is that it is an analytic method that avoids the use of Chebyshev functions. 2. Riemann’s prime counting function J(x) Let an be defined by 1/k n = pk,p prime an = (7) (0 otherwise In his paper on π(x), Riemann [2] defined J(x) as the summatory function for an: 1 J(x)= a = (8) n k n x 1<pk x X≤ X≤ This function has a remarkable property that allows us to connect it to the standard prime counting function π(x): Theorem 1. For x 2, we have ≥ J(x)= π(x)+ (√x log log x) (9) O Proof. It follows from (8) that π(x1/k) π(√x) J(x) π(x)= − k ≤ k 2 k log x 2 k log x ≤ X≤ 2 ≤ X≤ 2 √x √x log log x ≤ k ≪ 2 k log x ≤ X≤ 2 By (9), asymptotic formula for J(x) can be ported to π(x) with ease, so we can study π(x) simultaneously when we analyze J(x). 3. Integral representation for J(x) and π(x) Riemann [2] had shown that 1 k+i xs J(x)= ∞ log ζ(s)ds (10) 2πi k i s Z − ∞ for noninteger x > 2 and k > 1 using Fourier analysis. However, because (10) involves infinite integrals, it would be difficult to analyze its asymptotic behavior directly, so we wish to convert (10) into a quantitative form. In other words, we prove a special case of Perron’s formula [13][8]. Lemma 1. For (s) > 1, we have ℜ ∞ a n = log ζ(s) (11) ns n=1 X Proof. Since (s) > 1, the left hand side converges absolutely, we can change the order of summation safely:ℜ ∞ a ∞ 1 1 n = = log ns kpks 1 p s n=1 p p − X X Xk=1 X − 1 = log = log ζ(s) 1 p s p − Y − Lemma 2. For k> 1 and noninteger x> 2, if we set 1 k+iT xs J(x)= log ζ(s)ds + R1(x,k,T ) (12) 2πi k iT s Z − then xk ∞ 1 R (x,k,T ) (13) 1 ≪ T nk log x/n nX=1 | | Proof. If we define 0 0 <y< 1 h(y)= (14) (1 y > 1 then J(x) can be rewritten into ∞ x J(x)= a h (15) n n n=1 X The right hand side converges certainly because the summand vanishes once n>x. Due to Titchmarsh [13], for k> 1 we have 1 k+iT ys yk h(y)= ds + (16) 2πi k iT s O T log y Z − | | Since log ζ(s) converges absolutely whenever (s) = k > 1, we plug (16) and (11) into (15). Finally, a 1 allows us to deduce (13). ℜ | n|≤ Lemma 3. Using the same notation, we have xk x log x x R (x,k,T ) + + (17) 1 ≪ T (k 1) T T x N − | − | where N denotes the nearest integer to x. Proof. To handle the logarithms in the denominator in (13), we partition the sum into xk = + + + Tnk log x/N n n<x/2,n>2x x/2 n N 1 N+1 n 2x X X ≤X≤ − X≤ ≤ | | In the first sum, it is evident that log x/n > log 2, so we have | | xk 1 xk 1 xk ∞ 1 T nk log x/n ≪ T nk ≤ T nk n=1 n<x/X2,n>2x | | n<x/X2,n>2x X xk xk = ζ(k) T ≪ T (k 1) − in which the last inequality follows from the fact that ζ(s) 1/(s 1) when s 1 [13]. When x/2 n 2x, the logarithm function satisfies that∼ − → ≤ ≤ x x n log | − | (18) n ≫ x so we have xk 1 1 1 x 1 T nk log x/n ≪ T log x/n ≪ T x n x/2 n N 1 x/2 n N 1 x/2 n N 1 ≤X≤ − | | ≤X≤ − | | ≤X≤ − − x N 1 dt x x/2 x log x − = log ≪ T x t T x N + 1 ≪ T Zx/2 − − in which the last part follows from the fact that N 1/2 x N + 1/2. Due to symmetry, (18) can be applied to the sum over N + 1 n 2x−to obtain≤ the≤ same estimate. For the last part, using (18), we have ≤ ≤ xk 1 x (19) Tnk log x/N ≪ T log x/N ≪ T x N | | | | | − | Combining all these estimates gives (17). Theorem 2. For half-odd integer x> 2 and k =1+1/ log x, we have 1 k+iT xs π(x)= log ζ(s)ds + R2(x, T ) (20) 2πi k iT s Z − with x log x R (x, T ) + √x log log x (21) 2 ≪ T Proof. Plugging k =1+1/ log x into (17) gives x log x x R (x, 1 + 1/ log x, T ) + (22) 1 ≪ T T x N | − | when x is half-odd, we have x N = 1/2, so the second term of (22) can be removed. Plugging (22) into (12), we get | − | 1 k+iT xs x log x J(x)= log ζ(s)ds + (23) 2πi k iT s O T Z − Finally, we replace J(x) with (23) in (9) to obtain the result. 4. Evaluation of the integral To handle the integral, we consider a rectangular region R with vertices 1 δ iT and k iT . This implies − ± ± 1 k+iT xs 1 xs log ζ(s)ds = log ζ(s)ds (24) 2πi k iT s 2πi ∂R s Z − I 1 1 δ iT 1 δ+iT k+iT + − − + − + (25) 2πi k iT 1 δ iT 1 δ+iT Z − Z − − Z − where ∂R denotes the boundary of R in counterclockwise direction and δ is chosen such that ζ(s) =0in R and on ∂R. This means that the only singularity of the integrand in R is at s = 1. However,6 because s = 1 is a logarithmic singularity, circumvention is needed to evaluate it. Lemma 4. If we define 1 xs 1 f(r)= log ds (26) 2πi s s/r 1 I(r+) − where (r+) denotes any counterclockwise path that encloses only the singularity at s = r, then xr f ′(r)= (27) r for r = 0. 6 Proof. Since ∂ 1 ∂ 1 1 log = [log r log(s r)] = + ∂r s/r 1 ∂r − − r s r − − we have 1 xs 1 1 f ′(r)= + ds 2πi s r s r I(r+) − xs s r xr = lim − + 1 = s r s r r → Lemma 5. Using the same notation, for all η > 0 we have f(1 + iη) = li(x1+iη) iπ (28) − 1 iη f(1 iη) = li(x − )+ iπ (29) − Proof. When η> 0, because (26) implies lima f(a) = 0, we have →∞ 1+iη f(1 + iη)= f(1 + iη) f( + iη)= f ′(r)dr − −∞ +iη Z−∞ 1+iη xr (1+iη) log x eu = dr = du +iη r ( +iη) log x u Z−∞ Z −∞ u=r log x By Cauchy’s integral theorem [12],| we{z can deform} the path of integration of the last integral into a line segment connecting and ε < 0, a clockwise circular arc connecting ε and ε, and finally a line segment connecting−∞ ε and− (1 + ηi) log x.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R
    Recognizing the Real and the Potential: FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R Fields Medal recipients since inception Year Winners 1936 Lars Valerian Ahlfors (Harvard University) (April 18, 1907 – October 11, 1996) Jesse Douglas (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (July 3, 1897 – September 7, 1965) 1950 Atle Selberg (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (June 14, 1917 – August 6, 2007) 1954 Kunihiko Kodaira (Princeton University) (March 16, 1915 – July 26, 1997) 1962 John Willard Milnor (Princeton University) (born February 20, 1931) The Fields Medal 1966 Paul Joseph Cohen (Stanford University) (April 2, 1934 – March 23, 2007) Stephen Smale (University of California, Berkeley) (born July 15, 1930) is awarded 1970 Heisuke Hironaka (Harvard University) (born April 9, 1931) every four years 1974 David Bryant Mumford (Harvard University) (born June 11, 1937) 1978 Charles Louis Fefferman (Princeton University) (born April 18, 1949) on the occasion of the Daniel G. Quillen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (June 22, 1940 – April 30, 2011) International Congress 1982 William P. Thurston (Princeton University) (October 30, 1946 – August 21, 2012) Shing-Tung Yau (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (born April 4, 1949) of Mathematicians 1986 Gerd Faltings (Princeton University) (born July 28, 1954) to recognize Michael Freedman (University of California, San Diego) (born April 21, 1951) 1990 Vaughan Jones (University of California, Berkeley) (born December 31, 1952) outstanding Edward Witten (Institute for Advanced Study,
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Abel Prize and the Honorary Abel Prize the History of the Abel Prize
    The History of the Abel Prize and the Honorary Abel Prize The History of the Abel Prize Arild Stubhaug On the bicentennial of Niels Henrik Abel’s birth in 2002, the Norwegian Govern- ment decided to establish a memorial fund of NOK 200 million. The chief purpose of the fund was to lay the financial groundwork for an annual international prize of NOK 6 million to one or more mathematicians for outstanding scientific work. The prize was awarded for the first time in 2003. That is the history in brief of the Abel Prize as we know it today. Behind this government decision to commemorate and honor the country’s great mathematician, however, lies a more than hundred year old wish and a short and intense period of activity. Volumes of Abel’s collected works were published in 1839 and 1881. The first was edited by Bernt Michael Holmboe (Abel’s teacher), the second by Sophus Lie and Ludvig Sylow. Both editions were paid for with public funds and published to honor the famous scientist. The first time that there was a discussion in a broader context about honoring Niels Henrik Abel’s memory, was at the meeting of Scan- dinavian natural scientists in Norway’s capital in 1886. These meetings of natural scientists, which were held alternately in each of the Scandinavian capitals (with the exception of the very first meeting in 1839, which took place in Gothenburg, Swe- den), were the most important fora for Scandinavian natural scientists. The meeting in 1886 in Oslo (called Christiania at the time) was the 13th in the series.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Theorems in Mathematics
    SOME FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS IN MATHEMATICS OLIVER KNILL Abstract. An expository hitchhikers guide to some theorems in mathematics. Criteria for the current list of 243 theorems are whether the result can be formulated elegantly, whether it is beautiful or useful and whether it could serve as a guide [6] without leading to panic. The order is not a ranking but ordered along a time-line when things were writ- ten down. Since [556] stated “a mathematical theorem only becomes beautiful if presented as a crown jewel within a context" we try sometimes to give some context. Of course, any such list of theorems is a matter of personal preferences, taste and limitations. The num- ber of theorems is arbitrary, the initial obvious goal was 42 but that number got eventually surpassed as it is hard to stop, once started. As a compensation, there are 42 “tweetable" theorems with included proofs. More comments on the choice of the theorems is included in an epilogue. For literature on general mathematics, see [193, 189, 29, 235, 254, 619, 412, 138], for history [217, 625, 376, 73, 46, 208, 379, 365, 690, 113, 618, 79, 259, 341], for popular, beautiful or elegant things [12, 529, 201, 182, 17, 672, 673, 44, 204, 190, 245, 446, 616, 303, 201, 2, 127, 146, 128, 502, 261, 172]. For comprehensive overviews in large parts of math- ematics, [74, 165, 166, 51, 593] or predictions on developments [47]. For reflections about mathematics in general [145, 455, 45, 306, 439, 99, 561]. Encyclopedic source examples are [188, 705, 670, 102, 192, 152, 221, 191, 111, 635].
    [Show full text]
  • John Forbes Nash Jr
    John Forbes Nash Jr. (1928–2015) Camillo De Lellis, Coordinating Editor John Forbes Nash Jr. was born in Bluefield, West Virginia, on June 13, 1928 and was named after his father, who was an electrical engineer. His mother, Margaret Virginia (née Martin), was a school teacher before her marriage, teaching English and sometimes Latin. After attending the standard schools in Bluefield, Nash entered the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh (now Carnegie Mel- lon University) with a George Westinghouse Scholarship. He spent one semester as a student of chemical engi- neering, switched momentarily to chemistry and finally decided to major in mathematics. After graduating in 1948 with a BS and a MS at the same time, Nash was of- fered a scholarship to enter as a graduate student at either Harvard or Princeton. He decided for Princeton, where in 1950 he earned a PhD de- of John D. Stier. gree with his celebrated work on noncooperative Courtesy games, which won him the John and Alicia Nash on the day of their wedding. Nobel Prize in Economics thirty-four years later. In the summer of 1950 groundbreaking paper “Real algebraic manifolds”, cf. [39], he worked at the RAND (Re- much of which was indeed conceived at the end of his search and Development) graduate studies: According to his autobiographical notes, Corporation, and although cf. [44], Nash was prepared for the possibility that the he went back to Princeton game theory work would not be regarded as acceptable during the autumn of the as a thesis at the Princeton mathematics department. same year, he remained a Around this time Nash met Eleanor Stier, with whom he consultant and occasion- had his first son, John David Stier, in 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Awards Winners in Mathematics: A
    International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology (IJAIST) ISSN: 2319:2682 Vol.3, No.10, October 2014 DOI:10.15693/ijaist/2014.v3i10.81-92 Major Awards Winners in Mathematics: A Bibliometric Study Rajani. S Dr. Ravi. B Research Scholar, Rani Channamma University, Deputy Librarian Belagavi & Professional Assistant, Bangalore University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad University Library, Bangalore II. MATHEMATICS AS A DISCIPLINE Abstract— The purpose of this paper is to study the bibliometric analysis of major awards like Fields Medal, Wolf Prize and Abel Mathematics is the discipline; it deals with concepts such Prize in Mathematics, as a discipline since 1936 to 2014. Totally as quantity, structure, space and change. It is use of abstraction there are 120 nominees of major awards are received in these and logical reasoning, from counting, calculation, honors. The data allow us to observe the evolution of the profiles of measurement and the study of the shapes and motions of winners and nominations during every year. The analysis shows physical objects. According to the Aristotle defined that top ranking of the author’s productivity in mathematics mathematics as "the science of quantity", and this definition discipline and also that would be the highest nominees received the prevailed until the 18th century. Benjamin Peirce called it "the award at Institutional wise and Country wise. competitors. The science that draws necessary conclusions". United States of America awardees got the highest percentage of about 50% in mathematics prize. According to David Hilbert said that "We are not speaking Index terms –Bibliometric, Mathematics, Awards and Nobel here of arbitrariness in any sense.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELEMENTARY PROOF of the PRIME NUMBER THEOREM: an HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (By D
    THE ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE PRIME NUMBER THEOREM: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (by D. Goldfeld) The study of the distribution of prime numbers has fascinated mathematicians since antiquity. It is only in modern times, however, that a precise asymptotic law for the number of primes in arbitrarily long intervals has been obtained. For a real number x>1, let π(x) denote the number of primes less than x. The prime number theorem is the assertion that x lim π(x) =1. x→∞ log(x) This theorem was conjectured independently by Legendre and Gauss. The approximation x π(x)= A log(x)+B was formulated by Legendre in 1798 [Le1] and made more precise in [Le2] where he provided the values A =1,B = −1.08366. On August 4, 1823 (see [La1], page 6) Abel, in a letter to Holmboe, characterizes the prime number theorem (referring to Legendre) as perhaps the most remarkable theorem in all mathematics. Gauss, in his well known letter to the astronomer Encke, (see [La1], page 37) written on Christmas eve 1849 remarks that his attention to the problem of finding an asymptotic formula for π(x) dates back to 1792 or 1793 (when he was fifteen or sixteen), and at that time noticed that the density of primes in a chiliad (i.e. [x, x + 1000]) decreased approximately as 1/ log(x) leading to the approximation x dt π(x) ≈ Li(x)= . 2 log(t) The remarkable part is the continuation of this letter, in which he said (referring to x Legendre’s log(x)−A(x) approximation and Legendre’s value A(x)=1.08366) that whether the quantity A(x) tends to 1 or to a limit close to 1, he does not dare conjecture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abel Prize Ceremony May 22, 2012
    The Abel Prize Ceremony May 22, 2012 Procession accompanied by the “Abel Fanfare” (Klaus Sandvik) Performed by musicians from The Staff Band of the Norwegian Armed Forces His Majesty King Harald enters the University Aula Cow-call and Little Goats´ dance (Edvard Grieg) Tine Thing Helseth, trumpet, and Gunnar Flagstad, piano Opening speech by Professor Nils Chr. Stenseth President of The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Speech by Minister of Education and Research Kristin Halvorsen Was it a dream? and The girl returned from meeting her lover (Jean Sibelius) Tine Thing Helseth, trumpet, and Gunnar Flagstad, piano The Abel Committee’s Citation Professor Ragni Piene Chair of the Abel Committee His Majesty King Harald presents the Abel Prize to Endre Szemerédi Acceptance speech by Abel Laureate Endre Szemerédi Libertango (Astor Piazzolla, arr: Storløkken) Tine Thing Helseth, trumpet, Gunnar Flagstad, piano, Erik Jøkling Kleiva, drums/percussion, and Nikolay Matthews, bass His Majesty King Harald leaves the University Aula Procession leaves The Prize Ceremony will be followed by a reception in Frokostkjelleren. During the reception, Endre Szemerédi will be interviewed by Tonje Steinsland. Many of his discoveries carry his name. One of the most important is Szemerédi’s Professor Endre Szemerédi Theorem, which shows that in any set of integers with positive density, there are arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. Szemerédi’s proof was a masterpiece of com- Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, binatorial reasoning, and was immediately recognized to be of exceptional depth and and Department of Computer Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, importance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fields Medal Should Return to Its Roots
    COMMENT HEALTH Poor artificial lighting GENOMICS Sociology of AI Design robots to OBITUARY Ben Barres, glia puts people, plants and genetics research reveals self-certify as safe for neuroscientist and equality animals at risk p.274 baked-in bias p.278 autonomous work p.281 advocate, remembered p.282 ike Olympic medals and World Cup trophies, the best-known prizes in mathematics come around only every Lfour years. Already, maths departments around the world are buzzing with specula- tion: 2018 is a Fields Medal year. While looking forward to this year’s announcement, I’ve been looking backwards with an even keener interest. In long-over- looked archives, I’ve found details of turning points in the medal’s past that, in my view, KARL NICKEL/OBERWOLFACH PHOTO COLLECTION PHOTO KARL NICKEL/OBERWOLFACH hold lessons for those deliberating whom to recognize in August at the 2018 Inter- national Congress of Mathematicians in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, and beyond. Since the late 1960s, the Fields Medal has been popularly compared to the Nobel prize, which has no category for mathematics1. In fact, the two are very different in their proce- dures, criteria, remuneration and much else. Notably, the Nobel is typically given to senior figures, often decades after the contribution being honoured. By contrast, Fields medal- lists are at an age at which, in most sciences, a promising career would just be taking off. This idea of giving a top prize to rising stars who — by brilliance, luck and circum- stance — happen to have made a major mark when relatively young is an accident of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Interviews
    Page 3 of 44 Fall 2017: IMAGE 59 FEATURE INTERVIEWS “The Field is as Exciting as Ever” Shmuel Friedland Interviewed by Lek-Heng Lim1 This interview was conducted in two parts, at the Kurah Mediterranean restaurant on November 16, 2016 and at the Armand’s Victory Tap restaurant on December 20, 2016. — Scholarly work — L.-H.L. - You have a reputation in the community for going after many daunting problems that would give most other mathematicians pause. One of these is the Jacobian Conjecture. How did you get into this problem? S.F. - When I went to Stanford as a postdoc, I realized that linear algebra and matrix theory were not what most people were interested in (laughter). Indeed, soon after I arrived at Stanford, Paul Cohen asked me what was the most important theorem in my field and I mentioned the Perron–Frobenius Theorem. A few days later he told me that he proved it using a hint in Dunford–Schwartz [7]. So I looked around for other things to work on besides matrix theory. There was this young assistant professor in the department whose work in geometry seemed to be generating a lot of excitement and I asked him what were the important open problems in geometry. He pointed me to the Jacobian Conjecture. This assistant professor is Shing-Tung Yau and the conjecture is of course still unresolved today. Working on it was both a blessing and a curse. I invested a lot of time but I published only two papers on the topic, despite spending more effort on it than on any of my other major research interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Math Man Atle Selberg Dead at 90 28 August 2007
    Math man Atle Selberg dead at 90 28 August 2007 Atle Selberg, a prolific mathematical researcher with multiple terms that bear his name, has died in Princeton, N.J., at the age of 90. The mathematician died Aug. 6 after suffering a heart attack in his home, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday. Selberg's contributions to the world of mathematics have been immortalized by concepts named for their creator: the Selberg trace formula, the Selberg sieve, the Selberg integral, the Selberg class, the Rankin-Selberg L-function, the Selberg eigenvalue conjecture and the Selberg zeta function. "His far-reaching contributions have left a profound imprint on the world of mathematics and we have lost not only a mathematical giant but a dear friend," Peter Goddard, director of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., told the Times. Selberg is survived by his second wife, Betty Compton; a daughter, Ingrid Maria Selberg of London; a son, Lars Atle Selberg of Middlefield, Conn.; stepdaughters Heidi Faith of Mountain View, Calif., and Cindy Faith of Roland Park, Md.; and four grandchildren. Copyright 2007 by United Press International APA citation: Math man Atle Selberg dead at 90 (2007, August 28) retrieved 25 September 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2007-08-math-atle-selberg-dead_1.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. 1 / 1 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Download: PDF, 2,1 MB
    CONTENTS EDITORIAL TEAM EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ROBIN WILSON Department of Pure Mathematics The Open University Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK e-mail: [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITORS STEEN MARKVORSEN Department of Mathematics Technical University of Denmark NEWSLETTER No. 43 Building 303 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark March 2002 e-mail: [email protected] KRZYSZTOF CIESIELSKI Mathematics Institute EMS Agenda ................................................................................................. 2 Jagiellonian University Reymonta 4 Editorial ........................................................................................................ 3 30-059 Kraków, Poland e-mail: [email protected] Executive Committee Meeting – Brussels ...................................................... 4 KATHLEEN QUINN The Open University [address as above] e-mail: [email protected] EMS News ..................................................................................................... 7 SPECIALIST EDITORS INTERVIEWS EMS-SIAM Conference .................................................................................. 8 Steen Markvorsen [address as above] SOCIETIES Aniversary - Niels Henrik Abel ................................................................... 12 Krzysztof Ciesielski [address as above] EDUCATION Interview - Sir John Kingman...................................................................... 14 Tony Gardiner University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Interview - Sergey P. Novikov
    [Show full text]
  • Fields Medal: Feature Nobel Prize for Young Mathematicians
    Fields Medal: Feature Nobel Prize for Young Mathematicians Short Short SUNITA CHAND & RAMESH CHANDRA PARIDA John Charles Fields IELDS Medal is often described as the Besides the medal and a citation, it of mathematics initially developed to “Nobel Prize of Mathematics” for the also carries a monetary award of US $ understand celestial mechanics. It studies Fprestige it carries. However, there are 15,000. No doubt it is much less as dynamical systems, which are simply a number of differences between the two. compared to the 1.5 million US dollar Nobel mathematical rules that describe how a The Nobel Prize is referred to as “a life Prize, but that does not erode the system changes over time. Lindenstrauss boat thrown at a person who has already importance of the Fields Medal, because developed powerful theoretical tools and reached the shore”, because in most it is awarded by a highly prestigious body used them to solve a series of striking cases the recipient is already a very like the IMU. problems in areas of mathematics that are famous and well-established person in his seemingly far afield. These methods are field and the prize is merely a recognition, The Medal expected to give continuous insights which does not serve as an incentive for The Fields Medal was designed by a throughout mathematics for decades to him. Critics also sarcastically say that to Canadian sculptor R. Tait McKenzie. Its come. get it one of the most important criteria is obverse carries the image of Archimedes Chau received the medal “For his “long life”, as most of the awardees are and a quote attributed to him, which reads proof of the Fundamental Lemma in the usually very aged and are at the fag end “Transire suum pectus mundoque potiri” in theory of automorphic forms through the of their lives.
    [Show full text]