A Cryogenic Telescope for Far-Infrared Astrophysics: a Vision for NASA in the 2020 Decade a White Paper Submitted to NASA’S Cosmic Origins Program Office

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cryogenic Telescope for Far-Infrared Astrophysics: a Vision for NASA in the 2020 Decade a White Paper Submitted to NASA’S Cosmic Origins Program Office A Cryogenic Telescope for Far-Infrared Astrophysics: A Vision for NASA in the 2020 Decade A white paper submitted to NASA’s Cosmic Origins Program Office 1,2 1 4 2,3 3,1 2 C.M. Bradford ∗ , P.F. Goldsmith , A. Bolatto , L. Armus , J. Bauer , P. Appleton , A. Cooray5,2, C. Casey5, D. Dale6, B. Uzgil7,2, J. Aguirre7, J.D. Smith8, K. Sheth10, E.J. Murphy3, C. McKenney1,2, W. Holmes1, M. Rizzo9, E. Bergin11 and G. Stacey12 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory 2California Institute of Technology 3Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, Caltech 4University of Maryland 5University of California, Irvine 6University of Wyoming 7University of Pennsylvania 8University of Toledo 9Goddard Space Flight Center 10NRAO, Charlottesville 11University of Michigan 12Cornell University May 7, 2015 Abstract Many of the transformative processes in the Universe have taken place in regions obscured by dust, and are best studied with far-IR spectroscopy. We present the Cryogenic-Aperture Large Infrared-Submillimeter Telescope Observatory (CALISTO), a 5-meter class, space-borne telescope actively cooled to T 4 K, emphasizing moderate-resolution spec- ∼ troscopy in the crucial 35 to 600 µm band. CALISTO will enable NASA and the world to study the rise of heavy elements in the Universe’s first billion years, chart star formation and black hole growth in dust-obscured galaxies through cosmic time, and conduct a census of forming planetary systems in our region of the Galaxy. CALISTO will capitalize on rapid progress in both format and sensitivity of far-IR detectors. Arrays with a total count of a few arXiv:1505.05551v1 [astro-ph.IM] 20 May 2015 105 detector pixels will form the heart of a suite of imaging spectrometers in which each detector reaches the photon × background limit. The Far-IR Science Interest Group will meet from 3–5 June 20151 with the intention of reaching consensus on the architecture for the Far-IR Surveyor mission. This white paper describes one of the architectures to be considered by the community. One or more companion papers will describe alternative architectures. ∗[email protected] 1http://conference.ipac.caltech.edu/firsurveyor/ 1 P1: FUI September 30, 2000 16:14 Annual Reviews AR108-18 AA52CH10-Madau ARI 4 August 2014 10:30 768 GENZEL ψ CESARSKY abLookback time (Gyr) Lookback time (Gyr) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2.5 –0.8 IR ) 2 –3 –1.2 Mpc 〉 d –1 1.5 k ψ –1.6 2.5 log (M year 1 ψ –2 UV log 0.5 –2.4 Far-IR range at z=2.5 Far-IR range at z=6 0 012345678 0123456710 100 8 Redshift Rest Wavelength [Redshiftµm] Figure 1: LEFT Cosmic star formation rate history as measured in the rest-frame ultraviolet, and far-infrared, reprinted Figure 8 from Madau & Dickinson, 2014 [44]. Red points are from Spitzer and Herschel, green and blue from rest-frame UV (a) SFR densities in the FUV (uncorrected for dust attenuation)Figure and 3 in theCombined FIR. The data LWS pointsSWS with symbols spectra are given of galaxies in Table 1(>.All6 octaves). Left: Combined SWS/LWS surveys. Purple points are from the Bouwens et al. [7, 6] based on deep Hubble+ fields using dropout28 selections. UV and IR luminosities have been converted to instantaneousspectrum SFR densities of the using Circinus the factors galaxyFUV 1. (Moorwood15 10〉 and 1999,IR 4.5 Sturm et al 1999b). The H2 lines and 44Right: Full-band spectrum of Circinus, a nearby galaxy with an active nucleus obscuredK = by dust,ψ obtainedK with= the ψ 10〉 (cgs units) valid for a Salpeter IMF. (b)Meandustattenuationinmagnitudesasafunctionofredshift.Mostofthedatapointslow-excitation atomic/ionic fine structure lines ([FeII], [SiII], [OI], [CII]) sample photodissocia- shownInfrared are based Space on UV Observatory spectral slopes (ISO) or [25,stellar 50, population 63]. This model shows fitting. the range The symbol of ionized, shapes atomic, and colors and correspond molecular to gas the cooling data sets 4 12 2 lines originating deep in the obscured core of thetion source. regions (Vertical (PDRs axis is λF; Sternbergλ, major ticks & 5 Dalgarno10− W m1995,− .) Hollenbach & Tielens 1997), shocks (Draine et cited in Table 1,withtheadditionofSalimetal.(2007)(cyan pentagon). Two versions of the attenuation× factors are shown for UV-selected galaxies at 2 < z < 7 (Reddy & Steidel 2009,al Bouwens 1983, etHollenbach al. 2012a) (offset & McKeeslightly in 1989), the redshift or axisX-ray for clarity): excited one gas (Maloney et al 1996). Hydrogen recom- integrated1Introduction, over the observed population Motivation (open symbols), the other extrapolated down to L 0(filled symbols). Data points from FUV = Burgarella et al. (2013) (olive green dots) are calculated by comparingbination the lines integrated and low-lying FIR and FUV ionic luminosity fine structure densities in linesredshift (excitation bins, potential <50 eV: [ArIII], [NeII], ratherAfter thanthe from Cosmic the UV Microwave slopes or UV-optical Background spectral (CMB) energy[NeIII], is distributions. accounted [SIII], for, Abbreviations: [OIII], the remaining [NII]) FIR,cosmic sample far-infrared; background mainly FUV, far-UV; HII light regions is IMF, the photoionized by OB stars (Spinoglio & initialintegrated mass function; emission IR, infrared; from all SFR, stars star-formation and galaxies rate.throughMalkan cosmic 1992, time. Voit The 1992), spectrum although of this cosmic ionizing background shocks shows may contribute in some sources (e.g. Contini two broad peaks with comparable observed flux density, one at 1 µm, and one at 150 µm. The long-wavelength ∼ ∼ component, called the Cosmic Infrared Background&Viegas (CIB) [23, 1992, 19], is Sutherland radiation from et dust al heated 1993). by Ionic stars or lines accreting from species with excitation potentials up to black holes. Its prominencesamples. is The a simple local consequence FIRLF has300 not of theeV been fundamental (e.g. drastically [OIV], link revised [NeV], between since the[NeVI], the star final formation IRAS [SiIX]) analyses and probe its fuel:(Sanders highly ionized coronal gas and require very the interstellar gas withet al. obscuring 2003, Takeuchi dust. We et now al. 2003);hardψ have strong radiation additional evidence AKARI fields that most (suchdata didof asthe notthe energy drastically accretion that has change been disks earlier produced of resultsAGNs) or fast ionizing shocks. Line ratios by galaxies through cosmic(Goto et time al. has 2011a,b; emerged Sedgwick in the far-IR et al. [54, 2011). 44]. The The typicalbiggest UV/optical remaining photon uncertainties from a young pertain star to the has been absorbed byfaint-end dust and re-radiated slope, where (see measurements Figuregive 1).In information general, vary significantly rest-frame about theultraviolet from physicalψ and optical-wavelength1 characteristics.2to 1.8 (or, somewhat oflight the emitting gas. Extinction corrections are = 〉 〉 does not access the obscuredimplausibly, regions even that2.0) dominate (e.g.,small Gotothe activity(A( etψ al.)/ in 2011b).A(V) galaxies. Analysis0.1 Similarly, to of 0.01 the in in widest-areanearby the 2–40galaxies FIRµ andm surveys region). in our fromRight: The starburst galaxy M82 (top): 〉 ψ own Milky Way, star-formingHerschel, such cores, as embedded H-ATLAS younglow (570 excitation stars, deg2) and (Eales protoplanetary lines, et al. strong 2010), disks may UIBs/PAHs; all help cool with primarily this. and The through the present AGN the un- NGC 1068 (bottom): high excitation, no far-infrared. certainties lead to a differenceUIBs/PAHs of a factor (Sturm of at least et 2 al to 1999b, 3 in the Colbert local FIR et luminosity al 1999, density. Spinoglio et al 1999). Sudden breaks in the Access provided by NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory on 04/06/15. For personal use only. The spaceborne Spitzer and Herschel observatories have demonstrated the importance of the far-IR waveband, but Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2014.52:415-486. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Nevertheless, as previously noted, in today’s relatively “dead” epoch of cosmic star formation, a it is only with sensitive spectroscopic capability thatSEDs astronomers are the will result have of the different opportunity aperture to study sizes in detail at the different inner wavelengths. Local bumps and unusual significant fraction of the FIR emission from ordinary spiral galaxies may arise from dust heated workings of galaxies at cosmological distancesby NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory on 03/18/09. For personal use only. andslopes late-stage in the forming Circinus planetary spectrum systems. (12–20 This capabilityµm and has not 35 yetµm) may be caused by residual calibration by intermediate-age and older stellar populations, not newly formed OB stars. Hence, it is not been realized because it requires a combination ofuncertainties. a cold telescope and very sensitive direct detectors. After 2 decades of development of superconductingnecessarily the detectors,best measure and ofwith the the SFR. system-level At higher experience redshifts, gained when the with cosmic-specific previous-generation SFR was cryogenic satellites,much we are larger, now in new a position star formation to field should CALISTO, dominate a large dust space heating, telescope making actively the IRcooled emission to a few a more degrees K with 10robust5 individual global far-IR tracer. detector pixels, each operating at the fundamental sensitivity limit set by the ∼ Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2000.38:761-814. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org astrophysical background.Local This measurements paper builds on of the the concept SMDexcitation/ionization have for CALISTO relied mainly presented on purely late states last optical decade and data are [26, (e.g., 10]; characteristic SDSS it will pho- tracers of different physical re- be a large facility-classtometry observatory and spectroscopy) launched to an or earth-sun on relativelygions: L2 halo shallowphotodissociation orbitwith NIR at data least from a 5-yearregions 2MASS.
Recommended publications
  • NASA Program & Budget Update
    NASA Update AAAC Meeting | June 15, 2020 Paul Hertz Director, Astrophysics Division Science Mission Directorate @PHertzNASA Outline • Celebrate Accomplishments § Science Highlights § Mission Milestones • Committed to Improving § Inspiring Future Leaders, Fellowships § R&A Initiative: Dual Anonymous Peer Review • Research Program Update § Research & Analysis § ROSES-2020 Updates, including COVID-19 impacts • Missions Program Update § COVID-19 impact § Operating Missions § Webb, Roman, Explorers • Planning for the Future § FY21 Budget Request § Project Artemis § Creating the Future 2 NASA Astrophysics Celebrate Accomplishments 3 SCIENCE Exoplanet Apparently Disappears HIGHLIGHT in the Latest Hubble Observations Released: April 20, 2020 • What do astronomers do when a planet they are studying suddenly seems to disappear from sight? o A team of researchers believe a full-grown planet never existed in the first place. o The missing-in-action planet was last seen orbiting the star Fomalhaut, just 25 light-years away. • Instead, researchers concluded that the Hubble Space Telescope was looking at an expanding cloud of very fine dust particles from two icy bodies that smashed into each other. • Hubble came along too late to witness the suspected collision, but may have captured its aftermath. o This happened in 2008, when astronomers announced that Hubble took its first image of a planet orbiting another star. Caption o The diminutive-looking object appeared as a dot next to a vast ring of icy debris encircling Fomalhaut. • Unlike other directly imaged exoplanets, however, nagging Credit: NASA, ESA, and A. Gáspár and G. Rieke (University of Arizona) puzzles arose with Fomalhaut b early on. Caption: This diagram simulates what astronomers, studying Hubble Space o The object was unusually bright in visible light, but did not Telescope observations, taken over several years, consider evidence for the have any detectable infrared heat signature.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General Seventieth Session 30 November 2015
    United Nations A/C.4/70/SR.10 General Assembly Distr.: General Seventieth session 30 November 2015 Official Records Original: English Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee) Summary record of the 10th meeting Held at Headquarters, New York, on Tuesday, 20 October 2015, at 3 p.m. Chair: Mr. Medan (Vice-Chair) ......................................... (Croatia) Contents Agenda item 53: International cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space (continued) This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be sent as soon as possible, under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned, to the Chief of the Documents Control Unit ([email protected]), and incorporated in a copy of the record. Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org/). 15-18136 (E) *1518136* A/C.4/70/SR.10 The meeting was called to order at 3 p.m. 4. Malaysia had recently launched a third privately- owned MEASAT communication satellite, and during the meeting of the Space Environment Utilization Agenda item 53: International cooperation in the Working Group at the 21st Asia Pacific Regional Space peaceful uses of outer space (A/70/20) (continued) Agency Forum (APRSA-21) held in late 2014, it had 1. Mr. Saleh (Iraq) said that his Government had been asked to lead two research projects on plants in launched its first satellite in 2014, with funding from microgravity. As part of global disaster management the Italian Government and assistance from the United under that Agency’s Sentinel Asia initiative, Malaysia Nations Industrial Development Organization continued to serve as a data-analysis node for the (UNIDO).
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Security 2010
    SPACE SECURITY 2010 spacesecurity.org SPACE 2010SECURITY SPACESECURITY.ORG iii Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data Space Security 2010 ISBN : 978-1-895722-78-9 © 2010 SPACESECURITY.ORG Edited by Cesar Jaramillo Design and layout: Creative Services, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Cover image: Artist rendition of the February 2009 satellite collision between Cosmos 2251 and Iridium 33. Artwork courtesy of Phil Smith. Printed in Canada Printer: Pandora Press, Kitchener, Ontario First published August 2010 Please direct inquires to: Cesar Jaramillo Project Ploughshares 57 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada Telephone: 519-888-6541, ext. 708 Fax: 519-888-0018 Email: [email protected] iv Governance Group Cesar Jaramillo Managing Editor, Project Ploughshares Phillip Baines Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada Dr. Ram Jakhu Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University John Siebert Project Ploughshares Dr. Jennifer Simons The Simons Foundation Dr. Ray Williamson Secure World Foundation Advisory Board Hon. Philip E. Coyle III Center for Defense Information Richard DalBello Intelsat General Corporation Theresa Hitchens United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Dr. John Logsdon The George Washington University (Prof. emeritus) Dr. Lucy Stojak HEC Montréal/International Space University v Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Acronyms PAGE 7 Introduction PAGE 11 Acknowledgements PAGE 13 Executive Summary PAGE 29 Chapter 1 – The Space Environment:
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysics
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astrophysics Space Telescope Users Committee Michael Garcia November 13, 2017 NASA HQ Update HST Program Scientist APRA, Athena Program Scientist LUVOIR, IXPE Deputy PS Astrophysics CubeSat/SmallSat POC www.nasa.gov Current Program: an integrated strategic plan We are executing a balanced strategic program for Astrophysics • Operating missions, large and small, continue to deliver paradigm changing science – Cosmology, Dark Energy, Exoplanets, Origin of Structure, … • Large strategic missions under development … – Are next generation great observatories – Will rewrite textbooks – Can only be done by NASA • A high cadence of Explorers has been resumed • Investing in the community has been prioritized – R&A, technology development, supporting capabilities, …. • Planning for the future is underway 2 Planning for the Future • Large Mission Concept Studies HabEx LUVOIR Lynx OST • Medium (Probe) Concept Studies – Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper (A. Cooray) – Cosmic Evolution through UV Spectroscopy Probe (W. Danchi) – Galaxy Evolution Probe (J. Glenn) – High Spatial Resolution X-ray Probe (R. Mushotzky) – Inflation Probe (S. Hanany) – Multi-Messenger Astrophysics Probe (A. Olinto) – Precise Radial Velocity Observatory (P. Plavchan) – Starshade Rendezvous Mission (S. Seager) – Transient Astrophysics Probe (J. Camp) – X-ray Timing and Spectroscopy Probe (P. Ray) 3 Planning for the Future Presentation on Technology by Thai Pham and Brendan Crill @ CAA Last Week Mission Gaps Being TRL 2 Gaps TRL 3 Gaps
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Operational Losses in Space Launch
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FINANCIAL OPERATIONAL LOSSES IN SPACE LAUNCH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By TOM ROBERT BOONE, IV Norman, Oklahoma 2017 FINANCIAL OPERATIONAL LOSSES IN SPACE LAUNCH A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BY Dr. David Miller, Chair Dr. Alfred Striz Dr. Peter Attar Dr. Zahed Siddique Dr. Mukremin Kilic c Copyright by TOM ROBERT BOONE, IV 2017 All rights reserved. \For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it?" Luke 14:28, KJV Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Overview of Operational Losses...................2 1.2 Structure of Dissertation.......................4 2 Literature Review9 3 Payload Trends 17 4 Launch Vehicle Trends 28 5 Capability of Launch Vehicles 40 6 Wastage of Launch Vehicle Capacity 49 7 Optimal Usage of Launch Vehicles 59 8 Optimal Arrangement of Payloads 75 9 Risk of Multiple Payload Launches 95 10 Conclusions 101 10.1 Review of Dissertation........................ 101 10.2 Future Work.............................. 106 Bibliography 108 A Payload Database 114 B Launch Vehicle Database 157 iv List of Figures 3.1 Payloads By Orbit, 2000-2013.................... 20 3.2 Payload Mass By Orbit, 2000-2013................. 21 3.3 Number of Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013.............. 21 3.4 Total Mass of Payloads in kg by Individual Mass, 2000-2013... 22 3.5 Number of LEO Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013........... 22 3.6 Number of GEO Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013..........
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Services Overview to the Planetary Exploration Decadal Survey Committee
    Launch Services Overview to the Planetary Exploration Decadal Survey Committee November 17, 2009 Bill Wrobel NASA / SOMD Agenda • Overview • Manifest • Launch Vehicles • Issues 2 Overview • NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) was consolidated at KSC in 1998 – LSP provides acquisition, technical management, mission integration and launch management • NASA utilizes a mixed fleet of vehicles (small, medium & intermediate) with varying levels of performance used to support a mix of mission sizes – Mainly for Science Mission Directorate payloads, but SOMD (TDRS) and other government agencies also use NASA launch services – Launches conducted from multiple ranges; CCAFS, VAFB, RTS, WFF, and Kodiak • Vehicles are selected from the NASA Launch Services Contract (NLS) – Through competition based on mass, orbit, class of payload, and best value – Current NLS contract expires in 2010, RFP released to extend the contract • Most recent contract action purchased four intermediate class missions – TDRS – K & L, RBSP and MMS • Important issues – Loss of Medium Class launch service provider, which has been 50% of NASA missions historically – Compressed manifest – Possibility that NASA incurs a portion of the intermediate class infrastructure costs post 2010 3 Launch Services Program Roles & Responsibilities • Identify & Aggregate NASA Space Launch Requirements • Provide Launch Services for Other Agencies, Upon Request • Procure Commercially Available Expendable Launch Vehicle Launch Services to meet Spacecraft mission requirements • Overall Integration
    [Show full text]
  • Satellites Added and Deleted for July 1, 2010 Release This Version of the Database Includes Satellites Launched Through July 1, 2010
    Satellites Added and Deleted for July 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through July 1, 2010. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 18 satellites • The deletion of 4 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Added Cryosat-2 – 2010-013A Kobalt-M [Cosmos 2462] – 2010-014A X-37B OTV-1 [USA 212) – 2010-015A SES 1 – 2010-016A Parus-99 [Cosmos 2463] – 2010-017A Astra 3B – 2010-021A ComsatBw-2 – 2010-021B Navstar GPS 62 [USA 213] – 2010-022A SERVIS 2 – 2010-023A Compass G-3 – 2010-024A Arabsat 5B – 2010-025A Shijian-12 – 2010-027A Picard – 2010-028A PRISMA – 2010-028B TanDEM-X – 2010-030A Ofeq 9 – 2010-031A COMS-1 – 2010-032A Arabsat 5A – 2010-032B Satellites Removed LES-9 – 1976-023B Galaxy-9 -- 1996-033A SERVIS-1 – 2003-050A Galaxy-15 – 2005-041A Satellites Added and Deleted for April 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through April 1, 2010. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 12 satellites • The deletion of 10 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Added Beidou 3 – 2010-001A Raduga 1M – 2010-002A SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) – 2010-005A Intelsat 16 – 2010-006A Glonass 731 [Cosmos 2459] – 2010-007A Glonass 735 [Cosmos 2461] – 2010-007B Glonass 732 [Cosmos 2460] – 2010-007C GOES-15 [GOES-P] – 2010-008A Yaogan 9A – 2010-009A Yaogan 9B – 2010-009B Yaogan 9C – 2010-009C Echostar 14 – 2010-010A Satellites Removed Thaicom-1A – 1993-078B Intelsat-4 – 1995-040A Eutelsat W2 – 1998-056A Raduga 1-5 [Cosmos 2372] – 2000-049A IceSat – 2003-002A Raduga 1-7 [Cosmos 2406] – 2004-010A Glonass 713 [Cosmos 2418) – 2005-050B Yaogan-1 – 2006-015A CAPE-1 – 2007-012P Beidou-2 [Compass G2] – 2009-018A Satellites Added and Deleted for January 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through January 1, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Database for May 1, 2021 Release This Version of the Database Includes Launches Through April 30, 2021
    Changes to the Database for May 1, 2021 Release This version of the Database includes launches through April 30, 2021. There are currently 4,084 active satellites in the database. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 836 satellites • The deletion of 124 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Deleted from Database for May 1, 2021 Release Quetzal-1 – 1998-057RK ChubuSat 1 – 2014-070C Lacrosse/Onyx 3 (USA 133) – 1997-064A TSUBAME – 2014-070E Diwata-1 – 1998-067HT GRIFEX – 2015-003D HaloSat – 1998-067NX Tianwang 1C – 2015-051B UiTMSAT-1 – 1998-067PD Fox-1A – 2015-058D Maya-1 -- 1998-067PE ChubuSat 2 – 2016-012B Tanyusha No. 3 – 1998-067PJ ChubuSat 3 – 2016-012C Tanyusha No. 4 – 1998-067PK AIST-2D – 2016-026B Catsat-2 -- 1998-067PV ÑuSat-1 – 2016-033B Delphini – 1998-067PW ÑuSat-2 – 2016-033C Catsat-1 – 1998-067PZ Dove 2p-6 – 2016-040H IOD-1 GEMS – 1998-067QK Dove 2p-10 – 2016-040P SWIATOWID – 1998-067QM Dove 2p-12 – 2016-040R NARSSCUBE-1 – 1998-067QX Beesat-4 – 2016-040W TechEdSat-10 – 1998-067RQ Dove 3p-51 – 2017-008E Radsat-U – 1998-067RF Dove 3p-79 – 2017-008AN ABS-7 – 1999-046A Dove 3p-86 – 2017-008AP Nimiq-2 – 2002-062A Dove 3p-35 – 2017-008AT DirecTV-7S – 2004-016A Dove 3p-68 – 2017-008BH Apstar-6 – 2005-012A Dove 3p-14 – 2017-008BS Sinah-1 – 2005-043D Dove 3p-20 – 2017-008C MTSAT-2 – 2006-004A Dove 3p-77 – 2017-008CF INSAT-4CR – 2007-037A Dove 3p-47 – 2017-008CN Yubileiny – 2008-025A Dove 3p-81 – 2017-008CZ AIST-2 – 2013-015D Dove 3p-87 – 2017-008DA Yaogan-18
    [Show full text]
  • 2Q2008 Quarterly Report (Final).Qxp
    Second Quarter 2008 Quarterly Launch Report 1 Introduction The Second Quarter 2008 Quarterly Launch Report features launch results from the first quarter of 2008 (January - March 2008) and forecasts for the second quarter of 2008 (April - June 2008) and the third quarter of 2008 (July - September 2008). This report contains information on worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital and commercial suborbital space launch events. Projected launches have been identified from open sources, including industry contacts, company manifests, periodicals, and government sources. Projected launches are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or both of the following: • Internationally-competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market); • Any launches licensed by the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under 49 United States Code Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). Contents First Quarter 2008 Highlights . .2 Vehicle Use . .4 Commercial Launch Events by Country . .5 Commercial vs. Non-commercial Launch Events . .5 Orbital vs. Suborbital Launch Events . .6 Launch Successes vs. Failures . .6 Payload Use . .7 Payload Mass Class . .7 Commercial Launch Trends . .8 Commercial Launch History . .9 Special Report: Human Factors Considerations for Commercial Human Spaceflight . .SR-1 Appendix A: First Quarter 2008 Orbital and Suborbital Launch Events . .A-1 Appendix B: Second Quarter 2008 Projected Orbital and Suborbital Launch Events . .B-1 Appendix C: Third Quarter 2008 Projected Orbital and Suborbital Launch Events . .C-1 Cover photo courtesy of Sea Launch, Copyright © 2008. A Sea Launch Zenit 3SL lifts off from the Odyssey Launch Platform in the Pacific Ocean on January 15, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Based, Space Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities
    Ground Based, Space Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Ground Based, Space Based, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Ground Based, Space Based, and Technological Development Activities Ground Based and Space Based Activities Ground Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Ground Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development, State of the Profession, and Other Activities Ground Based, Infrastructure, and Technological Development Activities Ground Based, Infrastructure, and State of the Profession Activities Ground Based and Infrastructure Activities Ground Based, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Ground Based and Technological Development Activities Ground Based Projects Space Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Space Based, Infrastructure, Technological Development Activities Space Based and Infrastructure Activities Space Based, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Space Based and Technological Development Activities Space Based and State of the Profession Activities Space Based Projects Infrastructure, Technological Development, and State of the Profession Activities Infrastructure, Technological Development, and Other Activities Infrastructure and Technological Development Activities Infrastructure, State of the Profession, and Other Activities Infrastructure and State of the Profession
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Space Telescope
    NASA Update Astrophysics Advisory Committee Meeting | June 23, 2020 Paul Hertz Director, Astrophysics Division Science Mission Directorate @PHertzNASA Outline • Celebrate Accomplishments § Science Highlights § Mission Milestones • Committed to Improving § SMD Science Plan 2020-2024 § Excellence through Diversity • Research Program Update § Research & Analysis, ROSES-2020 Updates § COVID-19 impacts • Missions Program Update § COVID-19 impacts § Operating Missions § Webb, Roman, Explorers • Planning for the Future § FY21 Budget Request § Project Artemis § Creating the Future § Response to APAC Recommendations 2 NASA Astrophysics Celebrate Accomplishments 3 SCIENCE TESS Enables Breakthrough Study HIGHLIGHT of Perplexing Stellar Pulsations Released: May 13, 2020 • Astronomers study the interiors of stars through their pulsations, a field called asteroseismology. o Sound waves travel through a star’s interior at speeds that change with depth, and they all combine into pulsation patterns at the star’s surface. o Astronomers can detect these patterns as tiny fluctuations in brightness and use them to determine the star’s age, temperature, composition, internal structure and other properties. • Astronomers have detected elusive pulsation patterns in dozens of young, rapidly rotating Delta Scuti stars, which are between 1.5 and 2.5 times the Sun’s mass. • Scientists have had trouble interpreting Delta Scuti pulsations. o These stars generally rotate once or twice a day. The rapid rotation flattens the stars at their poles and jumbles the pulsation patterns, making them more complicated and difficult to decipher. • To determine if order exists in Delta Scuti stars’ apparently chaotic pulsations, astronomers needed to observe a large set of stars multiple times with rapid sampling.Caption • Using NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), Kepler archive data, and several ground-based telescopes, astronomers found that pulsations in the well-behaved Delta Scuti group fall into two major categories, both caused by energy being stored and released in the star.
    [Show full text]