Prison Legal News (PLN)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prison Legal News (PLN) PRISON Legal News VOL. 22 No. 4 April 2011 ISSN 1075-7678 Dedicated to Protecting Human Rights Nationwide PLN Survey Examines Prison Phone Contracts, Kickbacks by John E. Dannenberg n exhaustive analysis of prison phone families – who are the overwhelming re- recent phone rates may now be in effect due Acontracts nationwide has revealed cipients of prison phone calls. Averaging to new contract awards or renewals, and that with only limited exceptions, tele- a 42% kickback nationwide, this indicates while data was obtained from all 50 states, phone service providers offer lucrative that the phone market in state prison sys- it was not complete for each category. See kickbacks (politely termed “commis- tems is worth more than an estimated $362 the chart accompanying this article for a sions”) to state contracting agencies million annually in gross revenue. breakdown of the data obtained. – amounting on average to 42% of gross In a research task never before ac- PLN has previously reported on the revenues from prisoners’ phone calls – in complished, Prison Legal News, using egregious nature of exorbitant prison order to obtain exclusive, monopolistic public records laws, secured prison phone phone rates, notably in our January 2007 contracts for prison phone services. contract information from all 50 states cover story, “Ex-Communication: Com- These contracts are priced not only (compiled in 2008-2009 and representing petition and Collusion in the U.S. Prison to unjustly enrich the telephone compa- data from 2007-2008). The initial survey Telephone Industry,” by University of nies by charging much higher rates than was conducted by PLN contributing writ- Michigan professor Steven Jackson. those paid by the general public, but are er Mike Rigby, with follow-up research by further inflated to cover the commission PLN associate editor Alex Friedmann. How Are Phone Rates Regulated? payments, which suck over $152 million The phone contracts were reviewed Domestic phone calls are generally per year out of the pockets of prisoners’ to determine the service provider; the divided into three categories: local, intra- kickback percentage; the annual dollar state and interstate. The rates charged for amount of the kickbacks; and the rates these calls depend on several factors and Inside charged for local calls, intrastate calls are regulated by different authorities. Lo- (within a state based on calls from one Lo- cal calls are usually flat-rate within a small Phone Rate Chart 16 cal Access and Transport Area to another, area around the call’s originating location; Editorial 18 known as interLATA), and interstate calls e.g., within the same city. (long distance between states). To simplify Local and intrastate calls are often Prisoners’ Human Rights 22 this survey, only collect call and daytime regulated by state public utility or ser- Crime Reporting 26 rates were analyzed. vice commissions, which set rate caps. Around 30 states allow discounted These caps are negotiated to allow phone Guantanamo Drugging 28 debit and/or prepaid collect calls, which companies to recover capital costs in a Washington Public Records Suit 32 provide lower prison phone rates (much reasonable time frame while also satisfying lower in some cases). However, since other requirements levied by the state. The latter Texas Parole Audit 34 states don’t offer such options and not all include subsidizing low-income phone us- prisoners or their families have access to ers, providing emergency communications Maine Private Prison Lobbying 37 debit or prepaid accounts, only collect for state agencies, and providing required Los Angeles Jail Heat Ray 38 calls – which are available in all prison phone coverage (such as emergency- systems except Iowa’s – were compared. reporting phone booths along major Prison Facebook Problems 43 Also, while telephone companies some- highways). Obviously, some of these state- Texas Legislator Sentenced 46 times provide reduced rates for evening mandated requirements are not in and of and nighttime calls, many prisoners don’t themselves profitable, so negotiation of New Jersey Bankrolls CEC 48 have the luxury of scheduling phone calls rate structures includes recouping these News in Brief 50 during those time periods. otherwise nonrecoverable costs. Lastly, it should be noted that more At the interstate level, phone com- Prison Legal News 1 April 2011 Protect your rights—the long awaited new edition of the Prisoners’ Self-Help Litigation Manual now yours for $45.95 An indispensable guide for prisoners and prisoner advocates FOURTH PRISONERS’ SELF-HELP EDITION LITIGATION MANUAL John Boston, Prisoners’ Rights Project of the New York City Legal Aid Society, and Daniel E. Manville, Attorney Specializing in Prisoners' Rights Litigation Prisoners’ Self-Help Litigation Manual is an indispensable guide for prisoners and prisoner advocates seeking to understand the rights guaranteed to prisoners by law and how to protect those rights. Over the past decade, prison law and conditions have changed significantly. This new edition is updated to include the most relevant prisoners’ rights topics and approaches to litigation, including: • Clear, comprehensive, practical advice on the conditions of confinement, civil liberties in prison, procedural due process, the legal system, how to litigate, conducting effective legal research, and writing legal documents. • Strategic focus on federal constitutional law and practice, with additional commentary on state law, providing prisoners and those wishing to assist them with the most important information concerning the legal rights of convicts and detainees. • Updates include all aspects of prisoners’ rights law as well as material on legal research, legal writing, types of legal remedies, and how to effectively use those remedies. Shipping is included in the $45.95 price—please fill out the form below to complete your order. PAYMENT OPTIONS (please check one): 4 EASY WAYS TO ORDER Check or money order enclosed (payable to Oxford University Press) Credit Card: � MasterCard � Visa � Amex Account Number ___________________________________________________ Phone: 866.445.8685 � Expiration Date _____________________________________________________ 2 Fax: 919.677.1303 Signature __________________________________________________________ : Web: www.oup.com/us BILL TO: * or mail this Order Dept. Oxford University Press, NAME _____________________________________________________________ form to: 2001 Evans Road, ADDRESS __________________________________________________________ Cary, NC 27513 _____________________________________________________________ CITY, STATE, ZIP ____________________________________________________ YES, I would like _______ copies of the Prisoners’ Self-Help _____________________________________________________________ Litigation Manual (ISBN: 9780195374407) at $45.95. Subtotal: $_________________________________________________ SHIP TO: NAME _____________________________________________________________ ADDRESS __________________________________________________________ Total Amount: $ ____________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ CITY, STATE, ZIP ____________________________________________________ April 2011 2 Prison Legal News when making bids. But that is not what PUBLISHER Prison Phone Contracts (cont.) guides their bid price or determines the Rollin Wright winning bidder in most cases. EDITOR panies are also regulated by the Federal With very few exceptions, prison Paul Wright Communications Commission (FCC). phone contracts contain kickback provi- ASSOCIATE EDITOR The FCC oversees rate structures across sions whereby the service provider agrees Alex Friedmann state lines, provides for an orderly inte- to pay “commissions” to the contracting COLUMNISTS gration of smaller telephone companies agency based on a percentage of the gross Michael Cohen, Kent Russell, into the national phone network, and is revenue generated by prisoners’ phone Mumia Abu Jamal responsible for implementing the Tele- calls. These kickbacks are not insignifi- CONTRIBUTING WRITERS communications Act of 1996. cant. At more than $152 million per year Mike Brodheim, Matthew Clarke, John Dannenberg, Derek Gilna, These regulatory agencies are neces- nationwide for state prison systems alone, Gary Hunter, David Reutter, sary to prevent one large company from the commissions dwarf all other consider- Mike Rigby, Brandon Sample, forming a monopoly and price gouging ations and are a controlling factor when Jimmy Franks, Mark Wilson the public with unreasonably high phone awarding prison phone contracts. research associate rates. However, such monopolies are only For example, when Louisiana issued Sam Rutherford prohibited in the non-prison market. an RFP for prison phone services in 2001, advertising DIRECTOR Prison phone service providers are free it specified that “[t]he maximum points, Susan Schwartzkopf to bid on contracts at the maximum rates sixty (60) ... shall be awarded to the bid- LAYOUT allowed by regulatory agencies, and upon der who bids the highest percentage of Lansing Scott/ winning such bids are effectively granted compensation ...,” and that “[t]he State Catalytic Communications a monopoly on phone services within a desires that the bidder’s compensation HRDC GENERAL COUNSEL given prison or jail system. percentages ... be as high as possible.” Lance Weber When the Alaska Dept. of Correc- PLN is a Monthly Publication The Prison Phone Bidding Process
Recommended publications
  • Perelman, M. (2007). Some Economics of Class. in M. Yates (Ed.), More
    Perelman, M. (2007). Some economics of class. In M. Yates (ed.), More unequal: Aspects of class in the United States. New York: Monthly Review Press. How much more will be required before the U.S. public awakes from its political slumber? Tepid action in the workplace, the voting booth, and the streets have allowed the right wing to steamroll revolutionary changes that have remade the entire sociopolitical structure of the United States. Since the election of Franklin Roosevelt in 1932, every Democratic administration with the exception of Lyndon Johnson's has been more conservative—often far more conservative—than the previous Democratic administration. Similarly, every elected Republican administration, with the single exception of George Herbert Walker Bush's, has been more conservative than the previous Republican administration. The deterioration in the distribution of income is a symptom of a far larger problem. Perhaps formulating the situation in the United States might help people understand their class interests as well as reveal who has benefited from the right-wing revolution. Critics of Marx have long taken pleasure in claiming that the rise of the middle class in the United States and other advanced capitalist economies disproves Marx's "predictions" of the course of capitalism. In recent decades, however, the distribution of income in the United States is coming to resemble that of many poor Latin American economies, with a shrinking middle class and an obscene share of wealth going to the richest members of society. Although proponents of the U.S. model pretend that recent economic trends represent a success, in truth they are signs of capitalism's failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • April New Books
    BROWNELL LIBRARY NEW TITLES, APRIL 2018 FICTION F ALBERT Albert, Susan Wittig. Queen Anne's lace / Berkley Prime Crime, 2018 While helping Ruby Wilcox clean up the loft above their shops, China comes upon a box of antique handcrafted lace and old photographs. Following the discovery, she hears a woman humming an old Scottish ballad and smells the delicate scent of lavender. Soon strange things start occurring. Could the building be haunted? F ARDEN Arden, Katherine. The bear and the nightingale: a novel / Del Rey, 2017 A novel inspired by Russian fairy tales follows the experiences of a wild young girl who taps the mysterious powers of a precious necklace given to her father years earlier to save her village from dark and dangerous forces. F BALDACCI Baldacci, David. The fallen / Grand Central Publishing, 2018 Amos Decker and his journalist friend Alex Jamison are visiting the home of Alex's sister in Barronville, a small town in western Pennsylvania that has been hit hard economically. When Decker is out on the rear deck of the house talking with Alex's niece, a precocious eight-year- old, he notices flickering lights and then a spark of flame in the window of the house across the way. When he goes to investigate he finds two dead bodies inside and it's not clear how either man died. But this is only the tip of the iceberg. There's something going on in Barronville that might be the canary in the coal mine for the rest of the country. Faced with a stonewalling local police force, and roadblocks put up by unseen forces, Decker and Jamison must pull out all the stops to solve the case.
    [Show full text]
  • GDC Inmate Handbook
    NOTICE This handbook does not replace the official Rules and Regulations of the Georgia Department of Corrections. Information from the Rules and Regulations of the Department has been included to help you understand what is required of you, but this information is to be used in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations. In any case, where there is a conflict between information in the Rules and Regulations and information in this handbook, the Rules and Regulations are to be followed. 1 INTRODUCTION Treat your time in a Correctional Facility as an opportunity to correct mistakes, to learn how to return to society as a contributing member. While you are here, treat others as you would like to be treated, observe rules and regulations, and participate actively in available programs, and you will be closer to that goal. If you are entering a State Prison for the first time you will be interested in what is expected of you, as well as what will be provided to you, by the Georgia Department of Corrections. This booklet will answer some of your questions. It outlines the rules and regulations of the Department, as well as the disciplinary and grievance procedures that will apply to you during your incarceration. You will also learn about the programs offered through your institution. There are rules and regulations, which you will be expected to observe while in prison as you prepare for your release from prison. You will be treated humanely and you will be allowed to earn opportunities to change the life habits that helped put you in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSAMBL ( [email protected] ) Umelec
    ANSAMBL (http://ansambl1.szm.sk; [email protected] ) Umelec Názov veľkosť v MB Kód Por.č. BETTER THAN EZRA Greatest Hits (2005) 42 OGG 841 CURTIS MAYFIELD Move On Up_The Gentleman Of Soul (2005) 32 OGG 841 DISHWALLA Dishwalla (2005) 32 OGG 841 K YOUNG Learn How To Love (2005) 36 WMA 841 VARIOUS ARTISTS Dance Charts 3 (2005) 38 OGG 841 VARIOUS ARTISTS Das Beste Aus 25 Jahren Popmusik (2CD 2005) 121 VBR 841 VARIOUS ARTISTS For DJs Only 2005 (2CD 2005) 178 CBR 841 VARIOUS ARTISTS Grammy Nominees 2005 (2005) 38 WMA 841 VARIOUS ARTISTS Playboy - The Mansion (2005) 74 CBR 841 VANILLA NINJA Blue Tattoo (2005) 76 VBR 841 WILL PRESTON It's My Will (2005) 29 OGG 841 BECK Guero (2005) 36 OGG 840 FELIX DA HOUSECAT Ft Devin Drazzle-The Neon Fever (2005) 46 CBR 840 LIFEHOUSE Lifehouse (2005) 31 OGG 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS 80s Collection Vol. 3 (2005) 36 OGG 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS Ice Princess OST (2005) 57 VBR 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS Lollihits_Fruhlings Spass! (2005) 45 OGG 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS Nordkraft OST (2005) 94 VBR 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS Play House Vol. 8 (2CD 2005) 186 VBR 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS RTL2 Pres. Party Power Charts Vol.1 (2CD 2005) 163 VBR 840 VARIOUS ARTISTS Essential R&B Spring 2005 (2CD 2005) 158 VBR 839 VARIOUS ARTISTS Remixland 2005 (2CD 2005) 205 CBR 839 VARIOUS ARTISTS RTL2 Praesentiert X-Trance Vol.1 (2CD 2005) 189 VBR 839 VARIOUS ARTISTS Trance 2005 Vol. 2 (2CD 2005) 159 VBR 839 HAGGARD Eppur Si Muove (2004) 46 CBR 838 MOONSORROW Kivenkantaja (2003) 74 CBR 838 OST John Ottman - Hide And Seek (2005) 23 OGG 838 TEMNOJAR Echo of Hyperborea (2003) 29 CBR 838 THE BRAVERY The Bravery (2005) 45 VBR 838 THRUDVANGAR Ahnenthron (2004) 62 VBR 838 VARIOUS ARTISTS 70's-80's Dance Collection (2005) 49 OGG 838 VARIOUS ARTISTS Future Trance Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown's Newsletter
    VOLUME TEN CROWN’S DECEMBER 2019 NEWSLETTER 2019 CanLIIDocs 3798 THE UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED: Craig A. Brannagan 3 UNDERSTANDING EXPLOITATION: Veronica Puls & Paul A. Renwick 15 THE NEW STATUTORY READBACK: Davin M. Garg 22 A HANDFUL OF BULLETS: Vincent Paris 26 SECONDARY SOURCE REVIEW: David Boulet 37 TRITE BITES FIREARM BAIL HEARINGS: Simon Heeney & Tanya Kranjc 65 REVOKING SUSPENDED SENTENCES: Jennifer Ferguson 69 2019 CanLIIDocs 3798 Crown’s Newsletter Please direct all communications to the Editor-in-Chief at: Volume Ten December 2019 [email protected] © 2019 Ontario Crown The editorial board invites submissions for Attorneys’ Association publication on any topic of legal interest in Any reproduction, posting, repub- the next edition of the Crown’s Newsletter. lication, or communication of this newsletter or any of its contents, in Submissions have no length restrictions whole or in part, electronically or in 2019 CanLIIDocs 3798 print, is prohibited without express but must be sent in electronic form to the permission of the Editorial Board. Editor-in-Chief by March 31, 2020 to be considered for the next issue. For other submission requirements, contact the Editor- in-Chief. Cover Photo: © 2019 Crown Newsletter Editor-in-Chief James Palangio Editorial Board Ontario Crown Attorneys Association Jennifer Ferguson Suite 2100, Box #30 Lisa Joyal 180 Dundas Street West Rosemarie Juginovic Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Copy Editor Ph: (416) 977-4517 / Fax: (416) 977-1460 Matthew Shumka Editorial Support Allison Urbshas 1 FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD James Palangio, editor-in-chief Jennifer Ferguson, Lisa Joyal & Rosemarie Juginovic The Crown Newsletter would like to acknowledge the contribution to this publication of David Boulet, Crown Attorney, Lindsay, for his years of support and contributions in providing a comprehensive review of secondary source materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Ohio Correctional Facility 2009 Inspection Report
    CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION INSPECTION COMMITTEE REPORT ON THE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Prepared and Submitted by CIIC Staff May 20, 2009 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INSPECTION PROFILE……………………….……………………………………...… 7 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS...................................................................................... 8 Attendance at a General Meal Period Attendance at an Educational or Rehabilitative Program BACKGROUND ON INSPECTION: Warden’s Invitation INSPECTION GOALS……………………………….…………………………..……...... 10 GOAL: Respond promptly to Warden’s invitation GOAL: Fulfill inspection and evaluation duties GOAL: Include positive changes cited by Warden in inspection INSPECTION ASSIGNMENTS…………………………………………………............... 12 Table 1. Planned Areas and Activities for Inclusion in the SOCF Inspection with CIIC Team Assignments INSTITUTION OVERVIEW..........................……………………………........……….. 13 Mission Statement STAFF Table 2. Breakdown of SOCF Staff by Gender and Race Table 3. Unit Management Positions Eliminated FY 08 Southern Ohio Correctional Facility.......................................................... 14 Meeting with Representative Staff INSPECTION.......................................................................................................................... 18 Processing/Entrance Initial Meeting Food Services................................................................................................................. 19 Library.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Prisons: Where Now and Where Next?
    Crime in prisons: Where now and where next? January 2019 John Campion Police and Crime Commissioner West Mercia Authors: Professor James Treadwell, Staffordshire University Dr Kate Gooch, School of Law, University of Leicester Georgina Barkham Perry, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester PCC regions covered are: Staffordshire, Warwickshire, West Mercia and West Midlands This report was commissioned by: John Campion Police and Crime Commissioner West Mercia 2 Crime in prisons: Where now and where next? Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Overview 5 3. Prisons in Context 6 4. Why Prison Crime in the Midlands Matters 8 5. Methodology 9 6. Defining Crime in Prison 11 7. The Scale and Nature of the Problem 12 The Illicit Economy 12 Drugs 13 Organised Crime Moving Inside 14 Criminal Finances in Prison 16 Short-term Imprisonment 17 Drugs in Prison 19 Illicit Mobile Phones 21 How can Mobile Phone Use be Countered? 22 Staff Corruption 25 8. Who is Involved 26 The Contemporary Prison Hierarchy 28 9. A Heterogenous Prison Estate 34 Young Offenders/Young Adults 34 The Women’s Prison Estate 34 Specialist Prisons for Men Convicted of Sex Offences 36 Category D (Open) Prisons 37 High Security (Dispersal) Prisons 37 10. Local Initiatives 39 11. Recommendations 45 National Policy 45 Local Initiatives and Local Recommendations 47 12. Conclusion 52 References 53 3 1 Introduction The vast majority of people in our country are law abiding The sense of determination and ‘joint endeavour’ was clear. and simply want to get on with their lives in a safe and However, what wasn’t clear was a sense that all agencies secure environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Bill HL Bill 121 of 2017–19
    Library Briefing Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Bill HL Bill 121 of 2017–19 Summary The Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Bill is a private member’s bill which would authorise public communication providers to disrupt the use of unlawful mobile phones in prisons. The provisions replicate those from the Government’s Prisons and Courts Bill (introduced in the 2016–17 session), which fell at the dissolution of Parliament for the 2017 general election.1 It would amend the Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Act 2012—which enabled prison governors to interfere with wireless telegraphy to disrupt mobile phone use in prisons—by allowing public communication providers to also interfere in an independent capacity. The bill was initially introduced in the House of Commons on 19 July 2017 by Ester McVey (Conservative MP for Tatton). However, when Ms McVey became a government minister in November 2017, Maria Caulfield (Conservative MP for Lewes) took over sponsorship of the bill. The bill received its second reading on 1 December 2017 and completed its stages with cross-party support in the Commons on 6 July 2018. On 9 July 2018, the bill received its first reading in the House of Lords under the sponsorship of Baroness Pidding (Conservative). It is due to receive its second reading in the Lords on 26 October 2018. Provisions of the Bill Clause 1 of the bill would amend section 1 of the Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Act 2012 (PIWTA) to allow the Secretary of State to authorise public communication providers (PCPs) to interfere with wireless telegraphy in prisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Reform Trust Response to Transforming Rehabilitation
    Prison Reform Trust response to Transforming Rehabilitation The Prison Reform Trust is an independent UK charity working to create a just, humane and effective penal system. We do this by inquiring into the workings of the system; informing prisoners, staff and the wider public; and by influencing Parliament, government and officials towards reform. The Prison Reform Trust's main objectives are: Reducing unnecessary imprisonment and promoting community solutions to crime Improving treatment and conditions for prisoners and their families Overview The Prison Reform Trust welcomes, with the caveats outlined in our response, the focus of the consultation on rehabilitation and extending support to short sentenced prisoners. The needs of this group have been neglected for too long. We welcome the acknowledgement of the importance of addressing common social factors behind their offending, including “broken homes, drug and alcohol misuse, generational worklessness, abusive relationships, childhoods spent in care, mental illness, and educational failure.” This presents a compelling case for government and local authority departments to work together to address the social factors that drive crime. This needs to be reflected in plans, and budgetary arrangements, for cross-departmental working at national and local levels. Our key points in response to the proposals are: Mentoring should be available to all prisoners serving less than 12 months on a voluntary basis Responsibility for the statutory supervision of all low, medium and high risk
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Torture in US Prisons.Pdf
    Evidence of U.S. Human Rights Violatiom American Friends Service Committee New York Metropolitan Region Criminal Justice Program 972 Broad Street, 6* moor Newark New Jersey 07102 XI* Bonnie Kernesr, Associate Director, Coordinator, Prison Watch Edited by Julia Lutrky Regional Director, Ehabeth Enloe CrinJnal Justice Program Director, Michael Ekner Prison Watch Program As&tant Masai Ehehosi Dedicated to Holbrook Teter 'odd (Hymg-Rae) Tarselli -.-- - - .- .-. .-. .- .. -- %OW.. They Live Squeezed Together, t- The forceful rushes ofthis isolational perversion has pulled my essence into a cersspool incesantly devoted to a grime of darlmess and sordid pungents of evil.. This just ain't life as the innumberable scopes of hurt-filled anxieties come forth in stripped depths! of a consciousness wrapped within interiors of doctrines in- with control cries diseased insanity traumatic and situated from cold functions! of wickedness .. This just ain't life pathologbed in a subsumed litany of steel and cement codes preoccupied with the disturbing thrust of death TABLE OF CONTENTS :;ourcesotherthanleners ........................................................... iv I'rcj:~~: ~ ~ ... Inrroduction .Thc En-XISof lsolalion .... ................................... ........ I I . Excessive Use of Force .......................................................... 4 i. Excessive Use of Restraints ........................................................ 8 Genaal ................................................................... 8 FourPointRestraint .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PO Box 1151, Lake Worth, FL 33460 (561)
    DEDICATED TO PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS OCTOBER 17, 2018 Dear HRDC Supporter, Every year we conduct an annual fundraiser in the fall because our income from magazine subscriptions and book sales does not cover the expenses for all the advocacy work we do on behalf of prisoners, their families and the victims of police state violence and exploitation. We receive very little in the way of foundation funding and rely on individual donors—people Still shot from American Jail, a 2018 CNN film by Academy like you—who can and do make a difference by donating to the Award-winning director Roger Ross Williams exploring the forces that fuel America's sprawling prison system. Human Rights Defense Center. We have had a very busy year. Last December we launched a new magazine, Criminal Legal News, to expand our news coverage of the criminal justice system from beginning to end; less than a year later, CLN already has close to 1,500 subscribers! Our social media presence on Twitter, Facebook and our daily e-newsletter continues to grow as we expand our advocacy reach. We also launched a new public records and government transparency project. But publishing is not enough. We want to make sure that all our readers, especially those in prisons and jails, can receive and read the magazines we publish and the books we distribute. Since the very first issue of PLN was published in May 1990, we have faced censorship by government officials who are not pleased with our coverage of the criminal justice system. To date, none have been as fanatical in their censorship as the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC).
    [Show full text]