Ralicky, Thomas From: Rod Richardson <
[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 2:55 PM To: Filipowich, Susan Cc: Curt Schade; Lucy Sachs; John Mackall; Michael Patrick; carl safina; Ralicky, Thomas Subject: Re: Site 840 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PS — I had not seen Curt’s reply before I sent this. But I think his response underscores the truth of my point: many will feel as shocked and betrayed as I do. — R On May 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Rod Richardson <
[email protected]> wrote: Susan, Thank you for the response to my questions. In the initial meetings, I and many others heard SCALP administrators say that “everything was on the table.” But if existing lease sites, particularly 840 - 841, that interfere with navigation rights, are now considered to be grandfathered- in in their current location, no matter what, no matter the objections of neighbors, and if SCALP will not begin to prohibit use of surface gear in the existing and operating sites objected to during the 10 year review process — then everything is NOT on the table. And if these things are off the table, and if you are taking zero action in the interim to limit the placement of NEW floating gear in locations where you know there are heavy objections (like 840) then this 10 year review process is a joke. Up until now I thought you were proceeding in good faith, that everything was on the table, as was said.