Stratigraphy and Structure of Dixon Mountain-Little Water Canyon Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Middle Jurassic of Western and Northern Europe: Its Subdivisions, Geochronology and Correlations
The Middle Jurassic of western and northern Europe: its subdivisions, geochronology and correlations John H. Callomon The palaeogeographic settings of Denmark and East Greenland during the Middle Jurassic are outlined. They lay in the widespread epicontinental seas that covered much of Europe in the post-Triassic transgression. It was a period of continuing eustatic sea-level rise, with only distant connections to world oceans: to the Pacific, via the narrow Viking Straits between Greenland and Norway and hence the arctic Boreal Sea to the north; and to the subtropical Tethys, via some 1200 km of shelf-seas to the south. The sedimentary history of the region was strongly influenced by two factors: tectonism and climate. Two modes of tectonic movement governed basinal evolution: crustal extension lead- ing to subsidence through rifting, such as in the Viking and Central Grabens of the North Sea; and subcrustal thermal upwelling, leading to domal uplift and the partition of marine basins through emergent physical barriers, as exemplified by the Central North Sea Dome with its associated volcanics. The climatic gradient across the 30º of temperate latitude spanned by the European seas governed biotic diversity and biogeography, finding expression in rock-forming biogenic carbonates that dominate sediments in the south and give way to largely siliciclastic sediments in the north. Geochronology of unrivalled finesse is provided by standard chronostratigraphy based on the biostratigraphy of ammonites. The Middle Jurassic saw the onset of considerable bioprovincial endemisms in these guide-fossils, making it necessary to construct parallel standard zonations for Boreal, Subboreal or NW European and Submediterranean Provinces, of which the NW European zonation provides the primary international standard. -
Text of Draft
Reconnaissance bedrock geologic map for the northern Alaska Peninsula area, southwest Alaska Including the Dillingham, Iliamna, Lake Clark, Taylor Mountains and the western part of the Kenai and Seldovia 1:250,000-scale quadrangles Compiled by Frederic H. Wilson, Robert B. Blodgett, Charles D. Blomé, Solmaz Mohadjer, Cindi C. Preller, Edward P. Klimasauskas, Bruce M. Gamble, and Warren L. Coonrad DISCLAIMER This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This World-Wide-Web publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Although all data and software published on this Web-site have been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and (or) the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in the use of this data, software, or related materials. -
Geological Survey Canada
BULLETIN 119 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS THE JURASSIC FAUNAS OF THE CANADIAN ARCTIC CADOCERATINAE Hans Frebold Price $2.50 1964 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA BULLE TIN 119 THE JURASSIC FAUNAS OF THE CANADIAN ARCTIC CADOCERATINAE By Hans Frebold DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA © Crown Copyrights reserved Available by mail from the Queen's Printer, Ottawa, from Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, and at the following Canadian Government bookshops: OTTAWA Daly Building, corner Mackenzie and Rideau TORONTO Mackenzie Building, 36 Adelaide St. East MONTREAL JEterna-Vie Building, 1182 St. Catherine St. West or through your bookseller A deposit copy of this publication is also available for reference in public libraries across Canada Price $2.50 Catalogue No. 42-119 Price subject to change without notice ROGER DUHAMEL, F.R.S.C. Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationery Ottawa, Canada 1964 PREFACE This report is based on fossil collections made over a vast area of the Canadian Arctic extending from Axel Heiberg Island in the north to the Aklavik region of the mainland and is a further contribution by the author on the Jurassic faunas of the Canadian Arctic. Detailed study of these ammonite faunas permits correlation of the associated Jurassic rocks and shows their faunal and stratigraphic relation ships with Alaska, East Greenland, and the Arctic areas of Europe and Asia. J. M. HARRISON, Director, Geological Survey of Canada OTTAWA, December 2, 1963 BULLETIN 119 — Die Jurafaunen der kanadischen Acktis CADOCERATINAE. Von Hans Frebold BiojiJieTeHt, 119 — r. <3>pe6ojib,,zT. -
Systematics, Endemism and Phylogeny of Indian Proplanulitins (Ammonoidea) from the Bathonian–Callovian of Kutch, Western India
Swiss J Palaeontol (2016) 135:23–56 DOI 10.1007/s13358-015-0101-2 Systematics, endemism and phylogeny of Indian proplanulitins (Ammonoidea) from the Bathonian–Callovian of Kutch, western India 1 1 Rakhi Dutta • Subhendu Bardhan Received: 25 February 2015 / Accepted: 28 August 2015 / Published online: 8 December 2015 Ó Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2015 Abstract Spath (1931) described five genera namely Si- Bathonian of Kutch (Roy et al. 2007). Procerites was a vajiceras Spath, Obtusicostites Buckman, Hubertoceras European genus and perhaps gave rise to Proplanulites in Spath, Kinkeliniceras Buckman and Cutchisphinctes Spath the Boreal Europe. We here envisaged that Sivajiceratinae from the Upper Bathonian and entire Callovian of Kutch, and the European Proplanulitinae show evolutionary con- western India and included 33 species within them. He vergence of some characters since they evolved from a grouped these genera within the subfamily Proplanulitinae common ancestral stock. of the Boreal Province. But however the palaeobiogeo- graphic distributions of the Kutch forms suggest that they Keywords Sivajiceratinae Á New subfamily Á Kutch Á were restricted within the Indo-Madagascan Province. Middle Jurassic Á Palaeobiogeography Á Evolution Callomon (1993) expressed doubts about the phylogenetic affinity of Kutch genera and inferred that proplanulitins of Kutch were unrelated to Boreal Proplanulites and consti- Introduction tute an endemic lineage. In the present study, we made a thorough systematic revision of proplanulitin taxa of Kutch The Bathonian of Kutch, western India, witnessed sudden in the light of intraspecific variability and sexual dimor- migration of many ammonite genera from different pro- phism. Our study reveals that Spath’s (1931) work suffered vinces as soon as the Kutch Basin opened up (Roy et al. -
Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironments of the Middle Jurassic to Lowermost Cretaceous Agardhfjellet Formation (Bathonian–Ryazanian), Spitsbergen, Svalbard
NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 1 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-1-02 Palaeoecology and palaeoenvironments of the Middle Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous Agardhfjellet Formation (Bathonian–Ryazanian), Spitsbergen, Svalbard Maayke J. Koevoets1, Øyvind Hammer1 & Crispin T.S. Little2 1Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. E-mail corresponding author (Maayke J. Koevoets): [email protected] We describe the invertebrate assemblages in the Middle Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous of the Agardhfjellet Formation present in the DH2 rock-core material of Central Spitsbergen (Svalbard). Previous studies of the Agardhfjellet Formation do not accurately reflect the distribution of invertebrates throughout the unit as they were limited to sampling discontinuous intervals at outcrop. The rock-core material shows the benthic bivalve fauna to reflect dysoxic, but not anoxic environments for the Oxfordian–Lower Kimmeridgian interval with sporadic monospecific assemblages of epifaunal bivalves, and more favourable conditions in the Volgian, with major increases in abundance and diversity of Hartwellia sp. assemblages. Overall, the new information from cores shows that abundance, diversity and stratigraphic continuity of the fossil record in the Upper Jurassic of Spitsbergen are considerably higher than indicated in outcrop studies. The inferred life positions and feeding habits of the benthic fauna refine our understanding of the depositional environments of the Agardhfjellet Formation. The pattern of occurrence of the bivalve genera is correlated with published studies of Arctic localities in East Greenland and northern Siberia and shows similarities in palaeoecology with the former but not the latter. -
Yellowstone Wolf Project: Annual Report, 2009
YELLOWSTONE WOLFPROJECT ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Yellowstone Wolf Project Annual Report 2009 Douglas Smith, Daniel Stahler, Erin Albers, Richard McIntyre, Matthew Metz, Kira Cassidy, Joshua Irving, Rebecca Raymond, Hilary Zaranek, Colby Anton, Nate Bowersock National Park Service Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2010-06 Suggested citation: Smith, D.W., D.R. Stahler, E. Albers, R. McIntyre, M. Metz, K. Cassidy, J. Irving, R. Raymond, H. Zaranek, C. Anton, N. Bowersock. 2010. Yellowstone Wolf Project: Annual Report, 2009. National Park Ser- vice, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-2010-06. Wolf logo on cover and title page: Original illustration of wolf pup #47, born to #27, of the Nez Perce pack in 1996, by Melissa Saunders. Treatment and design by Renée Evanoff. All photos not otherwise marked are NPS photos. ii TABLE OF CON T EN T S Background .............................................................iv Wolf –Prey Relationships ......................................11 2009 Summary .........................................................v Composition of Wolf Kills ...................................11 Territory Map ..........................................................vi Winter Studies.....................................................12 The Yellowstone Wolf Population .............................1 Summer Predation ...............................................13 Population and Territory Status .............................1 Population Genetics ............................................14 -
Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 11-4-2011 Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Johnsgard, Paul A., "Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies" (2011). Zea E-Books. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRDS Rocky Mountain Birds Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska–Lincoln Zea E-Books Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Copyright © 2011 Paul A. Johnsgard. ISBN 978-1-60962-016-5 paperback ISBN 978-1-60962-017-2 e-book Set in Zapf Elliptical types. Design and composition by Paul Royster. Zea E-Books are published by the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries. Electronic (pdf) edition available online at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/ Print edition can be ordered from http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/unllib Contents Preface and Acknowledgments vii List of Maps, Tables, and Figures x 1. Habitats, Ecology and Bird Geography in the Rocky Mountains Vegetational Zones and Bird Distributions in the Rocky Mountains 1 Climate, Landforms, and Vegetation 3 Typical Birds of Rocky Mountain Habitats 13 Recent Changes in Rocky Mountain Ecology and Avifauna 20 Where to Search for Specific Rocky Mountain Birds 26 Synopsis of Major Birding Locations in the Rocky Mountains Region U.S. -
Palaeontology and Biostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Qihulin
Dissertation Submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences presented by Master of Science: Gang Li Born in: Heilongjiang, China Oral examination: 30 November 2001 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (Printed with the support of German Academic Exchange Service) Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Qihulin Formation in eastern Heilongjiang, northeastern China Referees: Prof. Dr. Peter Bengtson Prof. Pei-ji Chen This manuscript is produced only for examination as a doctoral dissertation and is not intended as a permanent scientific record. It is therefore not a publication in the sense of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Abstract The purpose of the study was to provide conclusive evidence for a chronostratigraphical assignment of the Qihulin Formation of the Longzhaogou Group exposed in Mishan and Hulin counties of eastern Heilongjiang, northeastern China. To develop an integrated view of the formation, all collected fossil groups, i.e. the macrofossils (ammonites and bivalves) and microfossils (agglutinated foraminifers and radiolarians) have been studied. The low-diversity ammonite fauna consists of Pseudohaploceras Hyatt, 1900, and Eogaudryceras Spath, 1927, which indicate a Barremian–Aptian age. The bivalve fauna consists of eight genera and 16 species. The occurrence of Thracia rotundata (J. de C: Sowerby) suggests an Aptian age. The agglutinated foraminifers comprise ten genera and 16 species, including common Lower Cretaceous species such as Ammodiscus rotalarius Loeblich & Tappan, 1949, Cribrostomoides? nonioninoides (Reuss, 1836), Haplophragmoides concavus (Chapman, 1892), Trochommina depressa Lozo, 1944. The radiolarians comprise ten genera and 17 species, where Novixitus sp., Xitus cf. -
The Evolution of the Jurassic Ammonite Family Cardioceratidae
THE EVOLUTION OF THE JURASSIC AMMONITE FAMILY CARDIOCERATIDAE by J. H. CALLOMON ABSTRACT.The beginnings of the Jurassic ammonite family Cardioceratidae can be traced back rather precisely to the sudden colonization of a largely land-locked Boreal Sea devoid of ammonites by North Pacific Sphaer- oceras (Defonticeras) in the Upper Bajocian. Thereafter the evolution of the family can be followed in great detail up to its equally abrupt extinction at the top of the Lower Kimmeridgian (sensu onglico). Over a hundred successive assemblages have been recognized, spanning some four and a half stages, twenty-eight standard ammonite zones and sixty-two subzones, equivalent on average to time-intervals of perhaps 250,000 years. Material at most levels is sufficiently abundant to delineate intraspecific variability and dimorphism. Both vary with time and can be very large. They point strongly to an important conclusion, that the assemblages found at any one level and place are monospecific. Morphological overlap between successive assemblages then identifies phyletic lineages. Evolution was on the whole gradualistic, with noise, although the principal lineage can be seen to have undergone phylogenetic division at least twice, followed by a major geographic migration of one or both branches. At other times, considerable mierations. which could be eeologicallv tns~antancous,did not lead to phylogenetic rpeciation. Thc habxtat 07 the famtly remaned broadly 'Horeil thro~phout,local endemlsmr hrinz infrequent and short-livcd Mot~holoeicall\,- .~the family evolved through almost the complete spectrum ofcoiling and sculpture to be found in ammonites as a whole, excluding heteromorphs. The nature of the selection-pressure, if any, remains totally obscure. -
Upper Jurassic Mollusks from Eastern Oregon and Western Idaho
Upper Jurassic Mollusks from Eastern Oregon and Western Idaho GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 483-D Upper Jurassic Mollusks from Eastern Oregon and Western Idaho By RALPH W. IMLAY CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 483-D Faunal evidence for the presence of Upper Jurassic sedimentary rocks in eastern Oregon and westernmost Idaho UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract.__________________________________________ Dl Ages and correlations Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 1 Trowbridge Formation of Lupher, 1941, in east- Biologic analysis..._________________________________ 2 central Oregon.__________---_-_-__-_-____---_ D9 Stratigraphic summary._____________________________ 2 Lonesome Formation of Lupher, 1941, in east-central Northeastern Oregon and adjoining Idaho. ________ 2 Oregon..________________-_--_____--_--_---__ 9 Mineral area, western Idaho.____________________ 2 Comparisons with other faunas.______________________ 10 East-central Oregon_____________________________ 4 Alaska and western British Columbia-____________ 10 Conditions of deposition.____________________________ 6 Calif ornia. ... _ __-_________--____-___-__---___-_ 10 Ages and correlations______________________________ 6 Unnamed beds in northeastern Oregon and adjoining Western interior of North America._______________ 10 Idaho_______________________________________ Geographic distribution________-_-_____---_---_-.__ 11 Unnamed beds near Mineral, Idaho.______________ Systematic descriptions..._--_--__-__________________ 13 Snowshoe Formation of Lupher, 1941, in east-central Literature cited_____-__-_____---------_-_--_--__-___ 17 Oregon._____________________________________ Index_.______________--____---------_-__---_-_-___ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-4 follow index] PLATE 1. -
The Upper Bajocian–Lower Bathonian Boundary Section in the Outskirts of Saratov: Molluscan Characteristics and Biostratigraphy V
ISSN 08695938, Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, 2011, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 502–514. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2011. Original Russian Text © V.V. Mitta, V.A. Zakharov, I.S. Barskov, V.B. Sel’tser, A.V. Ivanov, 2011, published in Stratigrafiya Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya, 2011, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 32–45. The Upper Bajocian–Lower Bathonian Boundary Section in the Outskirts of Saratov: Molluscan Characteristics and Biostratigraphy V. V. Mittaa, V. A. Zakharovb, I. S. Barskova, V. B. Sel’tserc, and A. V. Ivanovc a Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117647 Russia email: [email protected] b Geological Institute (GIN), Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 119017 Russia c Chernyshevskii Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya ul. 83, Saratov. 410012 Saratov Received February 4, 2011; in final form April 13, 2011 Abstract—The analysis of all available data on the structure of the Bajocian–Bathonian boundary section in the outskirts of Saratov (Sokur quarry) and the taxonomic composition of its ammonites, belemnites, and bivalves revealed a continuous succession of the Pseudocosmoceras michalskii (Upper Bajocian), Oraniceras besnosovi, and Arcticoceras ishmae (Lower Bathonian) zones. In connection with the critique by Meledina et al. (2009), correlation of Bajocian and Bathonian boundary strata of the Central Russia and Northern Siberia is discussed. The inconsistency of Siberian bivalve and belemnite assemblages with Central Russian ammonite zones is explained by heterochronous invasions of different molluscan groups. Keywords: Saratov Volga region, ammonites, Bajocian, Bathonian, biostratigraphy, zones, Boreal–Tethyan correlation. DOI: 10.1134/S086959381105008X INTRODUCTION sediments in the Saratov–Volgograd region (Lower Volga River). -
The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey
E PALEONT ON O T LO S G W I O C L A L L E National Y Park The Yellowstone Service Department of the Interior Paleontological Survey SURVEY Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 How to cite this document: Santucci, V. L. 1998. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey. Yellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming,YCR-NR-98-1. Current address for Vincent L. Santucci is National Park Service, P.O. Box 592, Kemmerer, WY 83101. The Yellowstone Paleontological Survey To Lt. Col. Luke J. Barnett, III “Uncle by blood, brother in spirit!” Vincent L. Santucci Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-NR-98-1 1998 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy .................................................................................................... 4 Fossil Chronology........................................................................................... 6 Taxonomy ..................................................................................................... 12 Localities ...................................................................................................... 15 Interpretation ................................................................................................ 19 Paleontological Resource Management.......................................................