DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology of Pre-Tertiary Rocks in the Northern Part of Yellowstone National Park, Wyon1ing by EDWARD T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology of Pre-Tertiary Rocks in the Northern Part of Yellowstone National Park, Wyon1ing by EDWARD T GEOLOGY OF PRE- TERTIARY ROCKS IN THE NORTHERN PART OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, m WYOMING "* ,~ - DivMOri Coforado Distril'l r ih•." n' Geology of Pre-Tertiary Rocks in the Northern Part of Yellowstone National Park, Wyon1ing By EDWARD T. RUPPEL With a section on Tertiary laccoliths, sills, and stocks in and near the Gallatin Range, Yellowstone National Park GEOLOGY OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 729-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600268 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-00242 Yellowstone National Park, the oldest of the areas set aside as part of the national park sys­ tem, lies amidst the Rocky Mountains in north­ western Wyoming and adjacent parts of Montana and Idaho. Embracing large, diverse, and complex geologic features, the park is in an area that is critical to the interpretation of many significant regional geologic problems. In order to provide basic data bearing on these problems, the U.S. Geological Survey in 1965 initiated a broad pro­ gram of comprehensive geologic and geophysical investigations within the park. This program was carried out with the cooperation of the National Park Service, and was also aided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which supported the gathering of geologic information needed in testing and in interpreting results from various remote sensing devices. This professional paper chapter is one of a series of technical geo­ logic reports resulting from these investigations. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _____________________________________________________________________________________ _ Al Geology- Continued Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________ _ 2 Mesozoic sedimentary rocks- Continued Previous work------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Jurassic- Continued Acknowledgments _____________________________________________________________ _ 4 Ellis Group- Continued Topography and drainage--------------------------------------------- 4 Swift Formation.... --------------------·------------· A26 Gallatin Range _________________________________________________________ _ 4 Morrison Formation--------·-···-·--·-------·-------------· 26 Mount Everts-Rescue Creek-------------------------------- 5 Cretaceous__________________________________________________________________ 27 Buffalo Plateau ________________________________________________________ _ 5 Lower Cretaceous formations----------------------· 27 Slough Creek-Soda Butte Creek_ _______________________ _ 5 Upper Cretaceous formations----------------------- 28 GeologY---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------· 5 Tertiary igneous rocks--------------------------------·-----·------------- 29 Precambrian metamorphic rocks--------------------------------· 8 PetrographY------------------------------------------------------------·· 30 Schist--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Quartz monzonite------------------------·-------------------- 30 Granitic gneiss---------------------------------------------------------­ 9 Rhyodacite and quartz latite_________________________ 33 Age and regional relations .... -------·--------------------·-· 10 Granodiorite, quartz diorite, and related Paleozoic_ sedimentary rocks ________________________________________ _ 11 rocks------------------------·-·---------------·------·-·---------·-· 33 Cambrian-----------------------------------·----·-------·····-·---·--·-··-·· 11 Descriptions of intrusive masses.---------------·-·------ 34 Flathead Sandstone ________________________________________ _ 12 Mount Holmes stock-------·----------------·-···------···· 34 Wolsey Shale ____________________________________________________ _ 13 Metamorphism... ----------·-·-----·····-··············· 35 Meagher Limestone------------------------------------------ 14 Laccoliths and sills----------------··--·-·-----------·----·· 36 Park Shale ... ------------------------------------------------------ 14 Metamorphism------------------------····---·----------· 37 Pilgrim Limestone.. -------------------------------·------·--- 15 Indian Creek laccolith-------------------------·-·· 37 Snowy Range Formation.... ___________________________ _ 15 Gallatin River sills .... ------·--------------··-----· 39 Dry Creek Shale Member-----------------------­ 16 Gray Peak-Snowshoe laccoliths and Sage Limestone Member ..... -------------------· 16 sills .. -------------------------------------------------------- 39 Grove Creek Limestone Member ........ 17 Fan Creek sills---------------------------···-----·---·- 40 Ordovician------------------------------------------------------------------ 17 Electric Peak sills .. -----------------------·-·--------· 40 Bighorn Dolomite----------------·---------------·------·----- 17 Gallatin River laccolith .... -----·---------------· 41 Devonian -------------------------------------------------------····-····--· 17 Mount Everts sills .. -------------····--·------·-···-· 41 Jefferson Formation---------------------------------------­ 18 Electric Peak stock---------------·--·-·-····------···---··· 42 Three Forks Formation.-------·--------·--------·------ 18 Metamorphism__________________________________________ 42 Mississippian ___________________________________________________________ _ 19 Bighorn Pass sheet-------·----·------·-------·----···-·---- 42 Lodgepole Limestone ______________________________________ _ 19 Age of intrusive rocks-----------------------------·--·------------ 43 Mission Canyon Limestone __________________________ _ 20 Structure·-----------------------------------------------------------------------·--- 44 Pennsylvanian-----·-----------·--··---------·------------·--·----·------ 21 Structure of Precambrian crystalline rocks....... 45 Amsden Formation _________________________________________ _ 22 Folds in sedimentary rocks ... -------------·------··-·-------- 45 Quadrant Sandstone.......... ------------·-----------------· 22 Crowfoot fault zone .. -----------------·------------·---------------·- 45 Permian _____________________________________________________________________ _ 23 Reverse faults----------------------------·------------------·--·-·--·--- 49 Shedhorn Sandstone. _______________________________________ _ 23 Age of reverse faulting .. --------------------------------· 50 Mesozoic sedimentary rocks------------------------------------·---· 23 North-trending normal faults_______________________________ 51 Triassic ______________________________________________________________________ _ 24 Age of north-trending faults ...... ----·-------------- 54 Dinwoody Formation.-------------------------------------· 24 Other north-trending probable faults and Woodside Formation _______________________________________ _ 24 lineaments-------------------------·------·-------·-·-----·--···· 54 Thaynes (?) Formation... ------------------------------·· 24 Northwest-trending normal faults_______________________ 55 Jurassic _____________________________________________________________________ _ 25 Regional implications and speculations .. ___________ 55 Ellis Group---------------------------------·------------·--·----·· 25 Stratigraphic sections------------------------------------------·-··--·-----------· 58 Sawtooth Formation.... ___________________________ _ 25 References cited-----------------------------------------·--·---·--·-·--·-···-------···· 62 Rierdon Formation _________________________________ _ 26 IndeX----------------------------------------------------------------·--------·--·----------······ 65 v VI CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Geologic map and sections of pre-Tertiary rocks, northern part of Yellowstone National Park _______________ Jn pocket FIGURE L Map showing areas of pre-Tertiary rocks, northern part of Yellowstone National Park, Wyo________________________ A3 2. Sketch showing the Gallatin Range from the southeast, with the Gibbon Geyser basin in the foreground 6 3. Photograph of cirques and glaciated valleys, Gallatin Range____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 4. Chart showing nomenclature of sedimentary rock units in Yellowstone National Park----------------------------------- 8 5-8. Photographs showing: 5. Sedimentary rocks exposed on Crowfoot Ridge, Gallatin Range------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 6. Three Rivers Peak, showing location of measured section of the Pilgrim Limestone and Snowy Range Formation·------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 7. Cliff outcrops of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks, view toward the south from Bighorn Pass, Gallatin Range·----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 8. Bannock Peak and the head of Panther Creek, showing location of measured section of Mississip- pian rocks, Gallatin Range·--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 9. Schematic cross section of part of Crowfoot Ridge, showing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yellowstone Science a Quarterly Publication Devoted to the Natural and Cultural Resources
    Yellowstone Science A quarterly publication devoted to the natural and cultural resources Apollinaris Spring through the Years Lewis & Clark Among the Grizzlies 1960s Winter Atmospheric Research, Part II Wildlife–Human Conflicts Volume 11 Number 1 Labors of Love NG DAN As the new year begins, we commem- promoted the Great Fountain orate the passing of three great friends of Project, an effort that, with the Yellowstone. support of the Yellowstone Park I didn’t know Don White, but his Foundation, mitigated the friends tell me that Don’s testimony before resource impacts on the geyser Congress helped bring geothermal protec- from the adjacent road and tion in Yellowstone into the national con- reduced off-boardwalk travel by sciousness. This, among many other providing more badly needed accomplishments in his career with the viewing space at the popular USGS, noted in this issue by Bob Fournier geyser. John assisted inter- and Patrick Muffler, earn him a place in preters on a daily basis by pro- the history of Yellowstone’s great scien- viding visitors with Old Faith- tists and friends. ful predictions after the visitor I did know Tom Tankersley. I worked center closed. He conducted for him as an interpreter for four years and thermal observations, interpret- I would be honored to be considered one ed geysers to the public, and of his friends. Tom was an excellent inter- was often seen with a hammer preter, a strong manager, and an extraordi- re-nailing thousands of loose nary human being. When I think of him, I boardwalk planks that presented a hazard returning to Yellowstone after 1997, vol- will remember that gleam in his eye when to visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Vol 6, No 3 |Ey SPRING 1993 Newslettar of the Llontana Natlve Plant Srclety
    --'-'-- Kelseya uniflora cI 0 Vol 6, No 3 |ey SPRING 1993 Newslettar of the llontana Natlve Plant Srclety Type Localities and the Botanical Exploration of Montana - Peter Lesica lf you're a member of the Montana Native Plant Society, you're colfections of blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata), balsamroot probably getting usad to hearing plants referred to by their (Balsamorhiza sagittata), silvery lupine (Lupinus argenteusl and scientific name. Even though the/re often long and hard to mountain death-camas (Zgadenus elegans) - not bad for a da/s pronounce, perhaps you're even becoming convinced that they're work. Two weeks later he found scarlet globe-mallow useful. But where do these names come from, and how do (Sphaeralcea coccinea) near the Marias River in Toole County. taxonomists know what name clrrec.tly applies to which plant? Another early explorer in western Montana was Nathaniel When spotted knapweed first appeared in North America, how did Wyeth. He made a number of type collections from what he said taxonomists know that it was a European weed, Centaurea was the vicinity of the Flathead River. Among these were maculosa, instead of something else - perhaps an undescribed Columbia virgin's-bower (Clematis columbiana), low larkspur species? Taxonomy rests on a system of standards: for each (Delphinium bicololl and Wyeth's lupine (Luprnus wyethiil. He species that is described new to science, there is a type also made the first collections of white-head mule's-ears and specimen. This type specimen represents what the ta,ronomist northern mu le's-ears (Wy eth i a am pl e x i cau I i s artd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sky, MT 59716 Images Via Email to [email protected] Or Use #Explorebigsky on Social Media to Be (406) 995-2055 • [email protected] Eligible
    May 12 - May 25, 2017 Volume 8 // Issue #10 Gallatin Valley gives big Nearly $700,000 raised in 24 hours Yellowstone River open for business Music in the Mountains kicks off June 22 Special Travel Section Day trips, weekend getaways and exotic locales Back 40: Gardening tips for a short growing season #explorebigsky explorebigsky explorebigsky @explorebigsky ON THE COVER: Tessa Moeckel climbs at Practice Rock, a popular crag located in Hyalite Canyon. PHOTO BY JOHN MEYER TABLE OF CONTENTS May 12 – May 25, 2017 Volume 8, Issue No. 10 Section 1: News Gallatin Valley gives big Owned and published in Big Sky, Montana Opinion.............................................................................4 Nearly $700,000 raised PUBLISHER Eric Ladd Local.................................................................................5 12 in 24 hours EDITORIAL Montana.........................................................................13 MANAGING EDITOR Regional.........................................................................15 Tyler Allen Yellowstone River SENIOR EDITOR Section 2: Environment, Sports, Health & Dining Amanda Eggert open for business 21 ASSOCIATE EDITOR Environment..................................................................17 Sarah Gianelli Sports.............................................................................20 CREATIVE Music in the Mountains LEAD DESIGNER Business.........................................................................21 Carie Birkmeier kicks off June 22 Health.............................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • 1922 Elizabeth T
    co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� �, : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Wyoming Board of Trustees' Report
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ REPORT September 6-8, 2007 The Final Report can be found on the University of Wyoming Board of Trustees website at www.uwyo.edu/trustees/meetings University of Wyoming Mission Statement (April 2002) The University of Wyoming aspires to be one of the nation’s finest public land-grant research universities, dedicated to serving as a statewide resource for accessible and affordable higher education of the highest quality, rigorous scholarship, technology transfer, economic and community development, and responsible stewardship of our cultural, historical, and natural resources. In the exercise of our primary mission to teach and educate students, we seek to provide academic and co-curricular opportunities that will: • Expose students to the frontiers of scholarship and creative activity, and the complexities of an interdependent world; • Ensure individual interactions among students, faculty, and staff; • Nurture an environment that values and manifests diversity, free expression, academic freedom, personal integrity, and mutual respect; and • Promote opportunities for personal growth, physical health, athletic competition, and leadership development for all members of the University community. As Wyoming’s only university, we are committed to outreach and service that extend our human talent and technological capacity to serve the people in our communities, our state, the nation, and the world. The primary vehicles for identifying the specific actions and resource allocations needed to achieve this complex mission are the University’s Academic Plan, Support Services Plan, and Capital Facilities Plan, each revised periodically. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING AGENDA September 6-8, 2007 Thursday, September 6, 2007 9:30 a.m.-11:45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Bark Beetles
    BARK BEETLE CONDITIONS NORTHERN REGION 2004 Ken Gibson USDA Forest Service Northern Region Forest Health Protection Missoula Field Office December 2004 BARK BEETLE CONDITIONS Northern Region 2004 REGIONAL SUMMARY Although late fall has turned out to be atypically dry, most of the Region received above normal amounts of precipitation during calendar year 2004. Most of Montana, and especially the eastern portions, have not completely broken out of the 4- to 5-year drought; however, growing conditions for most bark beetle hosts improved markedly throughout the Region. Despite improved conditions, long-term drought affects are not easily overcome. Too, many bark beetle species are at extremely high levels and will not respond to improved host conditions for a year or so. Those latter two factors combined to result in an increase in infested area by most bark beetle species across the Region. Unfortunately, less-than-optimal weather conditions late in the season prevented aerial survey of all beetle-infested areas. Approximately 85% of the forested portions of the 24 reporting areas were flown. While some areas appeared to be less impacted, for most of the Region, and particularly Montana; both aerial and ground-collected data showed still- increasing bark beetle infestations for most species. Mountain pine beetle-infested areas increased in many locations surveyed; however, in some locations, intensity of beetle-caused mortality is declining due to host depletion. Decreases in infested area recorded on the Lolo National Forest (NF), however, is a reflection of the amount of area flown—not necessarily an indication that the outbreak, overall, is waning. In total, considerably more infested acres were recorded in 2004 than in 2003; despite some heavily infested areas having not been flown.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report on the COVER Wolverine Tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report ON THE COVER Wolverine tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Photo by Jason Wilmot. Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report Authors John Squires Kerry Murphy US Forest Service US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Jackson Ranger District 800 East Beckwith Avenue PO Box 25 Missoula, Montana 59801 Jackson, Wyoming 83001 [email protected] [email protected] (formerly Yellowstone Center for Resources, With contributions from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming) Robert M. Inman Wildlife Conservation Society Jason Wilmot Wolverine Program Field Office Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative 222 East Main Street PO Box 2705 Lone Elk 3B Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] [email protected] Jeff Copeland Mark L. Packila US Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Rocky Mountain Research Station Wolverine Program Field Office 800 East Beckwith Avenue 222 East Main Street Missoula, Montana 59801 Lone Elk 3B [email protected] Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] Dan Tyers US Forest Service Doug McWhirter Gardiner Ranger District Wyoming Game and Fish Regional Office PO Box 5 2820 State Highway 120 Gardiner, Montana 59030 Cody, Wyoming 82414 [email protected] National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2011-02 March 2011 Suggested citation: Murphy, K., J. Wilmot, J. Copeland, D. Tyers, J. Squires, R. M. Inman, M. L. Packila, D. McWhirter. 2011. Wolverine conservation in Yellowstone National Park: Final report. YCR-2011-02. National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Evaluation of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Cockrell, Laura Elizabeth, "Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park" (2014). Online Theses and Dissertations. 222. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/222 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK By Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Bachelor of Science California State University, Chico Chico, California 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 Copyright © Laura Elizabeth Cockrell, 2014 All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends for their unwavering support during this adventure. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible through funding from the Yellowstone Park Foundation and the Society of Wetland Scientists Student Research Grant for support of field work, and by a Graduate Assistantship and Research Assistantship from the Department of Biological Sciences at Eastern Kentucky University. Thank you to Dr. Bob Frederick for his insight and persistence and for providing the GIS lab and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Geology, Structure, and Geophysics of the Central Black
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 2777 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION SHEET 2 OF 2 Pamphlet accompanies map 104°00' 103°30' 103°00' 104°00' 103°30' 103°00' ° ° EXPLANATION FOR MAPS F TO H 44 30' 44°30' EXPLANATION 44 30' 44°30' EXPLANATION Spearfish Geologic features 53 54 Tertiary igneous rocks (Tertiary and post-Tertiary Spearfish PHANEROZOIC ROCKS 90 1 90 sedimentary rocks not shown) Pringle fault 59 Tertiary igneous rocks (Tertiary and post-Tertiary Pre-Tertiary and Cretaceous (post-Inyan Kara sedimentary rocks not shown) Monocline—BHM, Black Hills monocline; FPM, Fanny Peak monocline 52 85 Group) rocks 85 Sturgis Sturgis Pre-Tertiary and Cretaceous (post-Inyan Kara A Proposed western limit of Early Proterozoic rocks in subsurface 55 Lower Cretaceous (Inyan Kara Group), Jurassic, Group) rocks 57 58 60 14 and Triassic rocks 14 Lower Cretaceous (Inyan Kara Group), Jurassic, B Northern extension (fault?) of Fanny Peak monocline and Triassic rocks Paleozoic rocks C Possible eastern limit of Early Proterozoic rocks in subsurface 50 Paleozoic rocks Precambrian rocks S Possible suture in subsurface separating different tectonic terranes 89 51 89 2 PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS of Sims (1995) 49 Contact St 3 G Harney Peak Granite (unit Xh) Geographic features—BL, Bear Lodge Mountains; BM, Bear Mountain; Fault—Dashed where approximately located G DT DT, Devils Tower 48 B Early Proterozoic rocks, undivided Anticline—Showing trace of axial surface and 1 St Towns and cities—B, Belle Fourche; C, Custer; E, Edgemont; HS, Hot direction of plunge.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]