DOCSLIB.ORG

A5343 a Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, Among Pa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A5343 a Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, Among Pa A5343 A Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, among Participants Taking Multidrug Treatment for Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis A Limited-Center Trial of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Sponsored by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Industry Support Provided by: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. ViiV Healthcare, Ltd. IND# 127,382 The ACTG Tuberculosis Transformative Science Group Gavin Churchyard, MBBCh, MMED, FCP, PhD, Chair Protocol Co-Chairs: Kelly Dooley, MD, PhD Gary Maartens, MBChB, MMed Protocol Vice Chair: Francesca Conradie, MD, DTM&H DAIDS Clinical Representatives: Richard Hafner, MD Roxana Rustomjee MbChB, MMed, FCPhM, FRCP, PhD Clinical Trials Specialists: Laura E. Moran, MPH Chanelle Houston, BS FINAL Version 4.0 June 26, 2018 A5343 FINAL Version 4.0 06/26/18 A Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, among Participants Taking Multidrug Treatment for Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis SIGNATURE PAGE I will conduct the study in accordance with the provisions of this protocol and all applicable protocol-related documents. I agree to conduct this study in compliance with United States (US) Health and Human Service regulations (45 CFR 46); applicable U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations; standards of the International Conference on Harmonization Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (E6); Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee determinations; all applicable in-country, state, and local laws and regulations; and other applicable requirements (eg, US National Institutes of Health, Division of AIDS) and institutional policies. Principal Investigator: _______________________________________________ Print/Type Signed: ___________________________________ Date: _____________ Name/Title A5343 FINAL Version 4.0 06/26/18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SIGNATURE PAGE .................................................................................................................... 2 SITES PARTICIPATING IN THE STUDY .................................................................................... 5 PROTOCOL TEAM ROSTER ..................................................................................................... 6 STUDY MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................... 10 GLOSSARY OF PROTOCOL-SPECIFIC TERMS ..................................................................... 12 SCHEMA .................................................................................................................................. 14 1.0 HYPOTHESES AND STUDY OBJECTIVES.................................................................. 15 1.1 Hypotheses ........................................................................................................ 15 1.2 Primary Objectives ............................................................................................. 15 1.3 Secondary Objectives ........................................................................................ 16 1.4 Exploratory Objectives ....................................................................................... 16 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Background........................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Rationale ........................................................................................................... 29 3.0 STUDY DESIGN ........................................................................................................... 31 4.0 SELECTION AND ENROLLMENT OF PARTICIPANTS ................................................ 33 4.1 Inclusion Criteria ................................................................................................ 33 4.2 Exclusion Criteria ............................................................................................... 35 4.3 Study Enrollment Procedures............................................................................. 37 4.4 Co-enrollment Guidelines ................................................................................... 38 5.0 STUDY TREATMENT ................................................................................................... 38 5.1 Regimens, Administration, and Duration ............................................................ 38 5.2 Study Product Formulation and Preparation ....................................................... 39 5.3 Pharmacy: Product Supply, Distribution, and Accountability .............................. 40 5.4 Concomitant Medications ................................................................................... 40 6.0 CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATIONS ........................................................... 43 6.1a Schedule of Evaluations (SOE): Screening through Treatment ........................ 43 6.1b SOE: Follow-up and Premature Discontinuation ................................................ 45 6.2 Timing of Evaluations ......................................................................................... 46 6.3 Instructions for Evaluations ................................................................................ 47 7.0 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES .............................................................................. 56 7.1 Specific Management of Toxicities Related to Study-Provided Drugs or MBT .... 57 7.2 Toxicity Management – Other ............................................................................ 65 7.3 Pregnancy.......................................................................................................... 66 7.4 Expected Toxicities of MBT Drugs ..................................................................... 66 8.0 CRITERIA FOR DISCONTINUATION ........................................................................... 67 8.1 Permanent and Premature Treatment Discontinuation ....................................... 67 A5343 FINAL Version 4.0 06/26/18 CONTENTS (Cont’d) Page 8.2 Premature Study Discontinuation ....................................................................... 68 9.0 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................... 68 9.1 General Design Issues ....................................................................................... 68 9.2 Outcome Measures ............................................................................................ 70 9.3 Randomization and Stratification ........................................................................ 73 9.4 Sample Size and Accrual ................................................................................... 73 9.5 Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 76 9.6 Analyses ............................................................................................................ 80 10.0 PHARMACOLOGY PLAN.............................................................................................. 83 10.1 Pharmacology Objectives .................................................................................. 83 10.2 Pharmacology Study Design .............................................................................. 83 10.3 Primary and Secondary Data, Modeling, and Data Analysis............................... 85 10.4 Anticipated Outcomes ........................................................................................ 86 11.0 DATA COLLECTION AND MONITORING AND ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING ........ 86 11.1 Records to Be Kept ............................................................................................ 86 11.2 Role of Data Management ................................................................................. 86 11.3 Clinical Site Monitoring and Record Availability .................................................. 86 11.4 Expedited Adverse Event (EAE) Reporting to DAIDS ........................................ 87 12.0 HUMAN PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................. 88 12.1 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review and Informed Consent ........................ 88 12.2 Participant Confidentiality ................................................................................... 89 12.3 Study Discontinuation ........................................................................................ 89 13.0 PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS .................................................................. 89 14.0 BIOHAZARD CONTAINMENT....................................................................................... 89 15.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 90 APPENDIX I: ASSESSMENT OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID (CSF) CONCENTRATIONS OF DELAMANID AND BEDAQUILINE AMONG PARTICIPANTS WITH MDR-TB ................................................................................... 96 APPENDIX II: SAMPLE INFORMED CONSENT .................................................................... 102 APPENDIX II-A: A5343 STUDY VISITS .................................................................................. 113 APPENDIX III: CONSENT FOR OPTIONAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of the Tolerability of the Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren and Lisinopril in Patients with Severe Hypertension
    Journal of Human Hypertension (2007) 21, 780–787 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9240/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE A comparison of the tolerability of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension RH Strasser1, JG Puig2, C Farsang3, M Croket4,JLi5 and H van Ingen4 1Technical University Dresden, Heart Center, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany; 2Department of Internal Medicine, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 31st Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; 4Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland and 5Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA Patients with severe hypertension (4180/110 mm Hg) LIS 3.4%). The most frequently reported AEs in both require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach groups were headache, nasopharyngitis and dizziness. recommended treatment goals (o140/90 mm Hg) and At end point, ALI showed similar mean reductions from usually require combination therapy to do so. This baseline to LIS in msDBP (ALI À18.5 mm Hg vs LIS 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel- À20.1 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 1.7 mm Hg group study compared the tolerability and antihyperten- (95% confidence interval (CI) À1.0, 4.4)) and mean sitting sive efficacy of the novel direct renin inhibitor aliskiren systolic blood pressure (ALI À20.0 mm Hg vs LIS with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor À22.3 mm Hg; mean treatment difference 2.8 mm Hg lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension (mean (95% CI À1.7, 7.4)). Responder rates (msDBPo90 mm Hg sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP)X105 mm Hg and/or reduction from baselineX10 mm Hg) were 81.5% and o120 mm Hg).
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development
    Clinical Pharmacology 1: Phase 1 Studies and Early Drug Development Gerlie Gieser, Ph.D. Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Div. IV Objectives • Outline the Phase 1 studies conducted to characterize the Clinical Pharmacology of a drug; describe important design elements of and the information gained from these studies. • List the Clinical Pharmacology characteristics of an Ideal Drug • Describe how the Clinical Pharmacology information from Phase 1 can help design Phase 2/3 trials • Discuss the timing of Clinical Pharmacology studies during drug development, and provide examples of how the information generated could impact the overall clinical development plan and product labeling. Phase 1 of Drug Development CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH PRE POST AND CLINICAL APPROVAL 1 DISCOVERY DEVELOPMENT 2 3 PHASE e e e s s s a a a h h h P P P Clinical Pharmacology Studies Initial IND (first in human) NDA/BLA SUBMISSION Phase 1 – studies designed mainly to investigate the safety/tolerability (if possible, identify MTD), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an investigational drug in humans Clinical Pharmacology • Study of the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of the drug in humans – PK: what the body does to the drug (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion) – PD: what the drug does to the body • PK and PD profiles of the drug are influenced by physicochemical properties of the drug, product/formulation, administration route, patient’s intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., organ dysfunction, diseases, concomitant medications,
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Mutations Leading to Para-Aminosalicylic Acid Resistance in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Analysis of mutations leading to para-aminosalicylic acid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Received: 9 April 2019 Bharati Pandey1, Sonam Grover2, Jagdeep Kaur1 & Abhinav Grover3 Accepted: 31 July 2019 Thymidylate synthase A (ThyA) is the key enzyme involved in the folate pathway in Mycobacterium Published: xx xx xxxx tuberculosis. Mutation of key residues of ThyA enzyme which are involved in interaction with substrate 2′-deoxyuridine-5′-monophosphate (dUMP), cofactor 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF), and catalytic site have caused para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) resistance in TB patients. Focusing on R127L, L143P, C146R, L172P, A182P, and V261G mutations, including wild-type, we performed long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit solvent to investigate the molecular principles underlying PAS resistance due to missense mutations. We found that these mutations lead to (i) extensive changes in the dUMP and MTHF binding sites, (ii) weak interaction of ThyA enzyme with dUMP and MTHF by inducing conformational changes in the structure, (iii) loss of the hydrogen bond and other atomic interactions and (iv) enhanced movement of protein atoms indicated by principal component analysis (PCA). In this study, MD simulations framework has provided considerable insight into mutation induced conformational changes in the ThyA enzyme of Mycobacterium. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the efective treatment of tuberculosis (TB) caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and has become a serious threat to global public health1. In 2017, there were reports of 5,58000 new TB cases with resistance to rifampicin (frst line drug), of which 82% have developed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB)2. AMR has been reported to be one of the top health threats globally, so there is an urgent need to proactively address the problem by identifying new drug targets and understanding the drug resistance mechanism3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Concept of Safety and Tolerability
    SECOND ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS April 25, 2017 Bethesda, MD Co-sponsored by Session 1 Exploring the Concepts of Safety and Tolerability: Incorporating the Patient Voice SECOND ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON CLINICAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS IN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS April 25, 2017 Bethesda, MD Co-sponsored by Disclaimer • The views and opinions expressed in the following slides are those of the individual presenters and should not be attributed to their respective organizations/companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the Critical Path Institute. • These slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenters and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 3 Session Participants Chair • Bindu Kanapuru, MD – Medical Officer, Division of Hematology Products, OHOP, FDA Presenters • James (Randy) Hillard, MD – Professor of Psychiatry, Michigan State University • Crystal Denlinger, MD, FACP – Associate Professor, Department of Hematology/Oncology; Chief, Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology; Director, Survivorship Program; Deputy Director, Phase 1 Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center • Katherine Soltys, MD – Acting Director, Bureau of Medical Sciences, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada • Karen E. Arscott, DO, MSc – Associate Professor of Medicine-Patient Advocate and Survivor, Geisinger Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • Glaucoma Medical Therapy Ocular Tolerability, Adherence, and Patient Outcomes
    CME Monograph November 30, 2017 September 23, 2016 Expiration: Original Release: November 1, 2016 Last Review: GLAUCOMA MEDICAL THERAPY OCULAR TOLERABILITY, ADHERENCE, AND PATIENT OUTCOMES ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION commercial interests in the form of Consultant/Advisory Therapy to lower intraocular pressure effectively reduces the Board: Alcon; Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; and Inotek risk of glaucoma progression. The rate of nonadherence with Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Contracted Research: Alcon; PROGRAM CHAIR therapy, however, remains high. Therapeutic nonadherence and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. is a complex and multifactorial issue that is influenced by Richard K. Parrish II, MD James C. Tsai, MD, MBA, had a financial agreement factors attributable to the physician, patient, and medication. or affiliation during the past year with the following Edward W. D. Norton Chair in Ophthalmology All medications have side effects, and tolerability issues can commercial interests in the form of Consultant/ Professor contribute to nonadherence if patients perceive that the Advisory Board: Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and Inotek disadvantages of therapy outweigh the benefits of controlling Director, Glaucoma Service Pharmaceuticals Corporation. a disease that is often asymptomatic. Therefore, the selection Bascom Palmer Eye Institute of initial and adjunctive therapy should consider the NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY OF MOUNT SINAI University of Miami Miller School of Medicine potential for tolerability issues that may adversely affect PEER REVIEW DISCLOSURE Miami, Florida adherence. Novel therapies in late-stage clinical development Joseph F. Panarelli, MD, had a financial agreement or affiliation will offer innovative mechanisms of action and unique risk/ during the past year with the following commercial interest FACULTY benefit profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020
    First independent framework for assessing pharmaceutical company action Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Access to Medicine Foundation would like to thank the following people and organisations for their contributions to this report.1 FUNDERS The Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark research programme is made possible with financial support from UK AID and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. Expert Review Committee Research Team Reviewers Hans Hogerzeil - Chair Gabrielle Breugelmans Christine Årdal Gregory Frank Fatema Rafiqi Karen Gallant Nina Grundmann Adrián Alonso Ruiz Hans Hogerzeil Magdalena Kettis Ruth Baron Hitesh Hurkchand Joakim Larsson Dulce Calçada Joakim Larsson Marc Mendelson Moska Hellamand Marc Mendelson Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda Kevin Outterson Katarina Nedog Sarah Paulin (Observer) Editorial Team Andrew Singer Anna Massey Deirdre Cogan ACCESS TO MEDICINE FOUNDATION Rachel Jones The Access to Medicine Foundation is an independent Emma Ross non-profit organisation based in the Netherlands. It aims to advance access to medicine in low- and middle-income Additional contributors countries by stimulating and guiding the pharmaceutical Thomas Collin-Lefebvre industry to play a greater role in improving access to Alex Kong medicine. Nestor Papanikolaou Address Contact Naritaweg 227-A For more information about this publication, please contact 1043 CB, Amsterdam Jayasree K. Iyer, Executive Director The Netherlands [email protected] +31 (0) 20 215 35 35 www.amrbenchmark.org 1 This acknowledgement is not intended to imply that the individuals and institutions referred to above endorse About the cover: Young woman from the Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark methodology, Brazil, where 40%-60% of infections are analyses or results.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy, Tolerability and Serum Phenytoin Levels After Intravenous Fosphenytoin Loading Dose in Children with Status Epilepticus
    R E S E A R C H P A P E R Efficacy, Tolerability and Serum Phenytoin Levels after Intravenous Fosphenytoin Loading Dose in Children with Status Epilepticus KAVITA SRIVASTAVA, SHIRISH BHARTIYA, VRUSHABH GAVLI, RAHUL PATIL AND SUREKHA RAJADHYAKSHA From Pediatric Neurology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India. Correspondence to: Dr Kavita Srivastava, Professor in Pediatrics, 3rd floor, Bharati Hospital, Katraj, Pune 411 043, India. [email protected] Received: July 05, 2018; Initial review: December 03, 2018; Accepted: December 04, 2019. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous children showed any local or systemic adverse effects. Serum fosphenytoin in children with status epilepticus, and resulting total phenytoin levels were in the therapeutic range (10-20 µg/mL) serum total phenytoin levels. in 12 (23.5%), sub-therapeutic in 16 (31.3%) and supra- Methods: In this prospective study, 51 children aged less than 18 therapeutic in 25 (49%) children. There was weak correlation of years received intravenous loading dose of fosphenytoin (18-20 the phenytoin levels with dose of fosphenytoin received, seizure mg/kg). Serum total phenytoin levels were estimated at 90 -100 control, or adverse effects. minutes. Outcomes studied were (i) seizure control and local and/ Conclusion: Intravenous fosphenytoin loading dose of 20 mg/kg or systemic adverse effects in next 24 hours and (ii) phenytoin is effective in controlling seizures in 88% of children with status levels and its correlation with dose received, seizure control and epilepticus, with a good safety profile. Seizure control and adverse adverse effects. effects appear to be independent of serum total phenytoin levels Results: The actual dose of fosphenytoin received varied from achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Allergy: Diagnosis and Management of Drug Allergy in Adults and Children
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE 1 Guideline title Drug allergy: diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults and children 1.1 Short title Drug allergy 2 The remit The Department of Health has asked NICE: ‘To produce a clinical guideline on Drug allergy: diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults and children 3 Clinical need for the guideline 3.1 Epidemiology a) Diagnosing a drug allergy is challenging, with considerable variation in service provision, practice and referral pattern. This can lead to under-diagnosis, misdiagnosis and self-diagnosis. b) All drugs have the potential to cause side effects, also known as adverse drug reactions, but not all of these are allergic in nature; other reactions are caused by drug intolerance, idiosyncratic reactions and pseudo-allergic reactions. c) The British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) defines drug allergy as an adverse drug reaction with an established immunological mechanism. However, the mechanism at presentation may not be apparent from the clinical history, and therefore, whether a drug reaction is allergic or non-allergic cannot always be established without investigation. Drug allergy guideline – Draft scope for consultation 3–31 October 2012 Page 1 of 8 d) Drug allergy can be further defined as an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to a medicinal product and may be divided into immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated (immediate onset) and non- IgE-mediated (delayed onset, usually involving T cells) reactions. e) Adverse drug
    [Show full text]
  • Updated WHO MDR-TB Treatment Guidelines and the Use of New Drugs in Children
    Updated WHO MDR-TB treatment guidelines and the use of new drugs in children Annual meeting of the Childhood TB subgroup Liverpool, UK, 26 October 2016 Dr Malgosia Grzemska WHO/HQ, Global TB Programme Outline • Latest epidemiological data • Existing guidelines • 2016 update of the DR-TB treatment guidelines • New recommendations for treatment of RR-TB and MDR- TB in children • Delamanid guideline for use in children and adolescents • Research gaps • Conclusions The Global Burden of TB - 2015 Estimated number Estimated number of cases of deaths 10,4 million 1.8 million* All forms of TB • 1 million Children (10%) • 210,000 children (170,000 HIV negative and 40,000 HIV- positive) HIV-associated TB 1.2 million (11%) 390,000 Multidrug-resistant TB 480,000 190,000 +100,000 RR cases Childhood TB: MDRTB estimates Dodd P., Sismanidis B., Seddon J., Lancet Inf Dis, 21 June 2016: Global burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis in children: a mathematical modelling study • It is estimated that over 67 million children are infected with TB and therefore at risk of developing disease in the future; – 5 mln with INH resistance; 2 mln with MDR; 100,000 with XDR • Every year 25,000 children develop MDRTB and 1200 XDR TB MDR-TB in children • MDR-TB in children is mainly the result of transmission of a strain of M. tuberculosis that is MDR from an adult source case , and therefore often not suspected unless a history of contact with an adult pulmonary MDR-TB case is known. • Referral to a specialist is advised for treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: from Pathogenesis to Clinical Practice
    ARTIGO DE REVISÃO Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: From pathogenesis to clinical practice Hipersensibilidade a anti-inflamatórios não esteroides: Da patogénese à prática clínica Data de receção / Received in: 28/10/2017 Data de aceitação / Accepted for publication in: 17/11/2017 Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2018; 26 (3): 207-220 Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Mário Morais-Almeida Imunoallergy Department, CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon ABSTRACT Nonsteroidal anti - inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the leading causes of hypersensitivity reactions, which affect a considerable percentage of the general population. These drugs can induce a wide spectrum of reactions with distinct timing, organ involvement and severity, including either immunological or nonimmunological mechanisms. A proper diagnosis can be particularly challenging since most reactions result from the pharmacological mechanism of the drug and might be dose - dependent. The clinical classification of NSAIDs - induced reactions has changed over time. Accurate diagnosis depends on strict clinical history and proper understanding of underlying mechanism. Skin testing and in vitro testing have limited usefulness. Drug chal- lenge tests with the culprit or alternative drugs are the gold standard for the diagnosis, and provide information about drug avoidance and safe therapeutic options. In selected cases drug desensitization might be a therapeutic option. In this review, we will attempt to highlight the main aspects to be taken into account for a proper management of patients with NSAIDs hyper- sensitivity. Key - words: Acetylsalicylate acid, alternative drugs, desensitization, diagnosis, hypersensitivity, nonsteroidal anti - inflammatory drugs. 207 REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE IMUNOALERGOLOGIA Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Mário Morais-Almeida RESUMO Os anti - inflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs) são uma das principais causas de reações de hipersensibilidade, afetando uma percentagem considerável da população em geral.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • Reseptregisteret 2012–2016 the Norwegian Prescription Database 2012–2016
    2017:2 LEGEMIDDELSTATISTIKK Reseptregisteret 2012–2016 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2012–2016 ISSN 1890-9647 Reseptregisteret 2012–2016 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2012–2016 Christian Lie Berg (redaktør) Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Per Olav Kormeset Solveig Sakshaug Hanne Strøm Sissel Torheim Utgitt av Folkehelseinstituttet / Published by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Området for Psykisk og fysisk helse Avdeling for Legemiddelepidemiologi April 2017 Tittel/Title: Legemiddelstatistikk 2017:2 Reseptregisteret 2012–2016 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2012–2016 Forfattere/Authors: Christian Lie Berg (redaktør) Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Per Olav Kormeset Solveig Sakshaug Hanne Strøm Sissel Torheim Bestilling/Order: Rapporten kan lastes ned som pdf på Folkehelseinstituttets nettsider: www.fhi.no/ The report is available as pdf format only and can be downloaded from www.fhi.no Layout omslag: www.fetetyper.no Layout/design, innhold: Houston 911 Kontaktinformasjon/Contact information: Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health P.O.Box 4404 Nydalen N-0403 Oslo Tel: +47 21 07 70 00 ISSN: 1890-9647 ISBN 978-82-8082-824-8 elektronisk utgave Sitering/Citation: Berg, C (red), Reseptregisteret 2012–2016 [The Norwegian Prescription Database 2012–2016] Legemiddelstatistikk 2017:2, Oslo, Norge: Folkehelseinstituttet, 2017. Tidligere utgaver / Previous editions: 2008: Reseptregisteret 2004–2007 / The Norwegian
    [Show full text]