DOCSLIB.ORG

Hickman's Potentilla

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hickman's Potentilla Potentilla hickmanii (Hickman’s potentilla) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation ©Bob Huettmann 2005 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California January 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Potentilla hickmanii (Hickman’s potentilla) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment. Species Overview: Potentilla hickmanii (Hickman’s potentilla) is a small perennial herb in the rose family. It is restricted to two general areas, one in San Mateo County and one in Monterey County, California, where it occurs within coastal terrace prairie habitat. In San Mateo County, a population of between 2,000 and 3,000 individuals is scattered over a half square mile (sq mi) (130 hectares (ha)). In Monterey County, one population comprised of less than 20 plants occurs on less than one quarter of an acre (0.1 ha). In addition to the two native populations, greenhouse-grown plants were outplanted to a site at Point Lobos State Reserve in Monterey County in 2006; whether these plants result in the establishment of a viable population remains to be seen. The coastal terrace prairie habitat that the species occurs in has been subjected to alteration and destruction due to development, changes in hydrologic regime, and invasion by nonnative species. In addition, the Monterey County population of Potentilla hickmanii is subject to grazing by deer, cattle, gophers, snails and slugs, and is experiencing reproductive failure. Methodology Used to Complete This Review: This review was prepared by the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office (VFWO), following the Region 8 guidance issued in March 2008. We used information from the Recovery Plan (Service 2004), survey information from experts who have been monitoring various localities of this species, and the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) maintained by the California Department of Fish and Game. The Recovery Plan and personal communications with experts were our primary sources of information used to update the species’ status and threats. This 5- year review contains updated information on the species’ biology and threats, and an assessment of that information compared to that known at the time of listing or since the last 5-year review. 2 We focus on current threats to the species that are attributable to the Act’s five listing factors. The review synthesizes all this information to evaluate the listing status of the species and provide an indication of its progress towards recovery. Finally, based on this synthesis and the threats identified in the five-factor analysis, we recommend a prioritized list of conservation actions to be completed or initiated within the next 5 years. Contact Information: Lead Regional Office: Diane Elam, Deputy Division Chief for Listing, Recovery, and Habitat Conservation Planning, and Jenness McBride, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Region 8, California and Nevada; (916) 414-6464. Lead Field Office: Connie Rutherford, Listing and Recovery Coordinator for Plants; Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office; (805)-644-1766 x 306. Cooperating Field Office(s): Kirsten Tarp, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office; (916) 414-6600. Federal Register (FR) Notice Citation Announcing Initiation of This Review: A notice announcing initiation of the 5-year review of this taxon and the opening of a 60-day period to receive information from the public was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2008 (73 FR 11945). The Service received one response to the notice, which we have considered in preparing this 5-year review. Listing History: Original Listing FR Notice: 63 FR 43100 Date of Final Listing Rule: August 12, 1998 Entity Listed: Potentilla hickmanii, species Classification: Endangered State Listing Potentilla hickmanii was listed by the State of California as endangered in 1979. Associated Rulemakings: N/A Review History: N/A Species’ Recovery Priority Number at Start of 5-Year Review: The recovery priority number for Potentilla hickmanii is 5C according to the Service’s 2007 Recovery Data Call for the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, based on a 1-18 ranking system where 1 is the highest-ranked recovery priority and 18 is the lowest (Endangered and Threatened Species Listing and Recovery Priority Guidelines, 48 FR 43098, September 21, 1983). This number indicates that the taxon is a species that faces a high degree of threat and has a low potential for recovery. The “C” 3 indicates conflict with construction or other development projects or other forms of economic activity. Recovery Plan or Outline Name of Plan or Outline: Recovery Plan for Five Plants from Monterey County, California Date Issued: August 19, 2004 II. REVIEW ANALYSIS Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) Policy The Endangered Species Act defines “species” as including any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct population segment (DPS) of any species of vertebrate wildlife. This definition of species under the Act limits listing as distinct population segments to species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. Because the species under review is a plant, the DPS policy is not applicable, and the application of the DPS policy to the species’ listing is not addressed further in this review. Information on the Species and its Status Species Biology and Life History Potentilla hickmanii is a small, long-lived, herbaceous perennial. The plant develops a woody taproot which presumably persists through years with unfavorable conditions (Abrams 1944); observers estimate the lifespan of an individual may be on the order of at least 25 or 30 years (Morosco 1997, Yadon in litt. 1997). Each individual consists of a basal rosette of leaves from which flowering stems are produced in favorable years. Each rosette can produce several yellow flowers; each flower has approximately 10 ovules and therefore a potential to produce 10 seeds. Plants also reproduced vegetatively by sending out runners which establish new rosettes. Historical Distribution Potentilla hickmanii was historically known from two general areas along the central coast of California: on the Monterey Peninsula in Monterey County, and in the Half Moon Bay area in San Mateo County. The type specimen was collected from the Monterey Peninsula “near the reservoir which supplies Pacific Grove” and described by Alice Eastwood in 1902. Several other collections were made from the Monterey Peninsula during the 1930s, but detail on specific locations is lacking. The species was collected from Moss Beach in San Mateo County, 60 miles (97 kilometers (km)) north of Monterey, in 1905 by Katherine Brandegee, and then again in a nearby location in 1933 by E.C. Sutliffe (Consortium of California Herbaria 2008). The plant is presumed extirpated from both of these sites due to changes in land use, primarily development. 4 Current Distribution The species is currently known from two native populations. In Monterey County, one population occurs on the south end of the Monterey Peninsula near Pebble Beach, where it occupies less than 0.25 acre (ac) (0.1 ha) of degraded coastal prairie habitat on private lands owned by Pebble Beach Company and is designated as a recreational day-use area. In San Mateo County, a population was discovered in 1995 near the town of Montara, approximately 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) away from the historic populations. The population occupies approximately a half sq mi (130 ha) of habitat; individuals are clustered into approximately six colonies. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) divides the colonies among two occurrences to reflect separate land owners (CNDDB 2008). Most of the individuals and colonies occur on lands owned by Peninsula Open Space Trust; a few of the individuals and colonies occur on adjacent lands owned by California Department of Transportation (CalTrans). In addition to the two remaining native populations, one outplanting is currently being attempted to establish a new population at Point Lobos State Reserve (Reserve), approximately 10 miles (16 km) south of the Pebble Beach population. However, it is too early for us to assess whether this outplanting effort will result in the establishment of a third viable population. Abundance Montara population, San Mateo County: since the population was discovered in 1995, the number of individuals observed has generally ranged between 2,000 and 3,000. Due to the small number of observations and difference in census methodology, no trends can be determined from these numbers. See Table 1 below for a summary of census data. Pebble Beach population, Monterey County: between the years 1987 and 2000, the number of individuals ranged from 5 to 35 (Doak et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix B Biological Resources Background Information
    6/21/2018 IPaC: Explore Location IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Monterey County, California Local oce Ventura Fish And Wildlife Oce (805) 644-1766 (805) 644-3958 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, CA 93003-7726 https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/DJMXCEE7HJCPLIT645GTRHKWNI/resources 1/18 6/21/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    15646 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 1997 / Proposed Rules Public Comments Solicited received within 45 days of the date of Author: The primary author of this The Service intends that any final publication of the proposal in the document is Adam Asquith, Ecological action resulting from this proposal will Federal Register. Such requests must be Services, Pacific Islands Ecoregion, U.S. be as accurate and as effective as made in writing and be addressed to the Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Ala possible. Therefore, comments or Ecoregion Manager (See ADDRESSES Moana Boulevard, Room 6307, P.O. Box suggestions from the public, other section). 50167, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 (808/ 541±3441). concerned governmental agencies, the National Environmental Policy Act scientific community, industry, or any List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 other interested party concerning this The Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed rule are hereby solicited. determined that Environmental Endangered and threatened species, Comments particularly are sought Assessments and Environmental Impact Exports, Imports, Reporting and concerningÐ Statements, as defined under the recordkeeping requirements, and (1) Biological, commercial trade, or authority of the National Environmental Transportation. other relevant data concerning threat (or Policy Act of 1969, need not be Proposed Regulation Promulgation lack thereof) to this species; prepared in connection with regulations (2) The location of any additional adopted pursuant to section 4(a) of the Accordingly, the Service hereby populations of this species and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as proposes to amend part 17, subchapter reasons why any habitat should or amended. A notice outlining the B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of should not be determined to be critical Service's reasons for this determination Federal Regulations, as set forth below: habitat as provided by section 4 of the was published in the Federal Register Act; on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244).
    [Show full text]
  • Garrapata State Park Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft
    COASTAL HABITAT RESTORATION AND COASTAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Garrapata State Park Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Monterey District June 13, 2012 This page intentionally blank. COASTAL HABITAT RESTORATION AND COASTAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS/MND – DRAFT JUNE 2012 GARRAPATA STATE PARK CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................ 1 CHAPTER II ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST...................................................... 13 I. AESTHETICS. ................................................................................ 17 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ...……………… 21 III. AIR QUALITY.................................................................................. 23 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................................... 26 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................. 48 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................. 64 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................. 69 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................. 70 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .......................................... 73 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING .......................................................... 78 XI. MINERAL
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountaingrove Lodge Appendix G Rare Plant Report
    Appendix G Rare Plant Survey Report Rare Plant Survey Report FOUNTAINGROVE LODGE SANTA ROSA, SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Mr. Steve McCullagh Aegis Senior Living 220 Concourse Blvd. Santa Rosa, California 95403 Contact: Tom Fraser [email protected] Date: May 2007 2169-G Ea st Fra nc isc o Blvd ., Sa n Ra fa e l, C A 94901 (415) 454-8868 te l (415) 454-0129 fa x info @w ra -c a .c o m www.wra-ca.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................1 1.1 Study Area Description...............................................1 1.1.1 Vegetation................................................1 1.1.2 Soils.....................................................4 2.0 METHODS..............................................................6 2.1 Background Data...................................................6 2.2 Field Survey.......................................................6 3.0 RESULTS. .............................................................7 3.1 Background Data Search Results.......................................7 3.2 Field Survey Results.................................................7 4.0 CONCLUSIONS..........................................................7 5.0 REFERENCES...........................................................8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location Map of Fountaingrove Lodge site. 2 Figure 2. Biological Communities within the Fountaingrove Lodge site. 3 Figure 3. Soils Map for the Fountaingrove Lodge site. 5 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Study Area Photographs Appendix B Special Status Plant Species Documented to Occur in the Vicinity of the Study Area Appendix C List of Observed Plant Species 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of 5 separate special status plant surveys conducted on approximately 9.85 acres to be developed as Fountaingrove Lodge (Study Area) in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California (Figure 1). The purpose of this study is to identify the location and presence of potentially occurring sensitive plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Legally Listed Species of the California Central Coast Region (U S Fish and Wildlife Service and /Or the State of California)
    Legally Listed Species of the California Central Coast Region (U S Fish and Wildlife Service and /or the State of California) (Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, western Kern, Santa Barbara, and Ventura counties) The following taxa, in alphabetical order by scientific name, are listed either by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Endangered Species Act) or by the State of California, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Database. A comprehensive list for the State of California is updated quarterly by the California Natural Diversity Database. [Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List.] The distribution of these species has been documented for California’s central coast region from Monterey and San Benito counties south to Ventura County, and including western Kern County. Scientific names are those used in Baldwin et. al., 2012, The Jepson Manual: vascular plants of California, UC Press, Berkeley. Where nomenclature has changed from the name used initially in the listing process, they are referenced to the current name (e.g., Arabis hoffmannii = Boechera hoffmannii). Listing Status FE = federally endangered (Endangered Species Act, 1973 as amended) FT = federally threatened (Endangered Species Act, 1973 as amended) SE = state endangered (California Endangered Species Act; Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.) ST = state threatened (California Endangered Species Act; Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.) SR = state rare (California Native Plant Protection Act; Fish and Game Code §1900 et seq.). Scientific Name Common Name Status Acmispon argophyllus var. niveus Santa Cruz Island birds-foot trefoil SE Arabis hoffmannii = Boechera hoffmannii Boechera hoffmannii Hoffmann’s rock-cress FE Arctostaphylos confertiflora Santa Rosa Island manzanita FE Arctostaphylos hookeri subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources of the Del Monte Forest Special-Status Species
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE DEL MONTE FOREST SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES DEL MONTE FOREST PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pebble Beach Company Post Office Box 1767 Pebble Beach, California 93953-1767 Contact: Mark Stilwell (831) 625-8497 Prepared by: Zander Associates 150 Ford Way, Suite 101 Novato, California 94945 Contact: Michael Zander (415) 897-8781 Zander Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Plates 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Special-Status Species in the DMF Planning Area...............................2 2.1 Species Occurrences...............................................................................................2 2.2 Special-Status Species Conservation Planning ......................................................2 2.3 Special-Status Species as ESHA ............................................................................7 3.0 Special-Status Plant Species ......................................................................................9 3.1 Hickman's Onion ....................................................................................................9 3.2 Hooker's Manzanita..............................................................................................10 3.3 Sandmat Manzanita ..............................................................................................10 3.4 Monterey Ceanothus.............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenbelt ISMND Public Review
    City of Monterey Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project title: City of Monterey Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Monterey, 570 Pacific Street, Monterey, California 93940 3. Contact person and phone number: Kimberly Cole, Community Development Director, (831) 646-3759 4. Project location: This project is located within the following seven City of Monterey greenbelts: (1) Skyline Forest, (2) Veteran’s Park, (3) Monte Vista, (4) Carmelo Street, (5) Don Dahvee, (6) Josselyn Canyon, and (7) Fisherman Flats (refer to Figures 1 and 2). 5. Project sponsor’s name and address: Kimberly Cole, City of Monterey, Planning Office, 580 Pacific Street, Monterey, California 93940 6. General Plan designation: Parks and Open Space 7. Zoning: Open Space (O), Planned Community (PC), and Residential Single-Family District (R-1) 8. Description of project: PROJECT LOCATION The City of Monterey (City) Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (project or proposed project) is located within the following seven City greenbelts: (1) Skyline Forest, (2) Veteran’s Park, (3) Monte Vista, (4) Carmelo Street, (5) Don Dahvee, (6) Josselyn Canyon, and (07) Fisherman Flats (see Figures 1 and 2). PROJECT BACKGROUND The City has identified seven treatment areas within the City’s greenbelt system where the fire hazard is high due to high fuel loads. Wildfire in these greenbelts (collectively “the Plan Area”) could result in substantial impacts to natural resources and substantial health, safety, and welfare impacts to the built/human environment adjacent to these areas. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of the proposed project is to reduce the risk of wildfire in the Plan Area through fuel reduction actions undertaken by the City.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Mcbride Mcbride Mcbride
    RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGEREDRARE AND PLA ENDANGEREDNT GUIDE FOR PLANT TIMBER GUIDE HARVEST FOR TIMBER PLANS HARVEST IN COASTAL PLANS MENDOCINO IN COASTAL COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY Field Guide Rare and Endangered Field GuideField Guide Plant Field Guide RareRare and and Endangered Endangered Plant Plant Field Guide for Timber Harvest Plans FieldField Guide Guide for forTimber Timber Harvest Harvest Plans Plans in inCoastalin Coastal Coastal Mendocino MendocinoMendocino County County County GordonGordonGordon McBride McBride McBride This Guide was published by Mendocino County Resource Conservation District This Guide was published by 410 Jones St., Suite C-3 MendocinoUkiah, CACounty 95482 Resource Conservation District 410 JonesPhone: St., (707) Suite 462 C-3664-3 Ukiah, CA 95482 Phone: (707) 462-3664 This publication can be downloaded for free from Edited by our website: Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, www.mcrcd.org EditedEdited by by This publication can be downloaded for free from Darcie Mahoney & Geri Hulse-Stephens our website: Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, Tamara Camper, Shayne Green, www.mcrcd.org Darcie Mahoney &43 Geri Hulse-Stephens 43 Darcie Mahoney & Geri Hulse-Stephens RARE AND ENDANGERED PLANT GUIDE FOR TIMBER HARVEST PLANS IN COASTAL MENDOCINO COUNTY RARE AND ENDANGEREDRARE AND PLA ENDANGEREDNT GUIDE FOR PLANT TIMBER GUIDE HARVEST FOR TIMBER PLANS HARVEST IN COASTAL PLANS
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society, Volume 9, December 2009
    4 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 9, December 2009 VASCULAR PLANTS OF SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA FROM THE SANS BOIS TO THE KIAMICHI MOUNTAINS Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1969 Francis Hobart Means, Jr. Midwest City, Oklahoma Current Email Address: [email protected] The author grew up in the prairie region of Kay County where he learned to appreciate proper management of the soil and the native grass flora. After graduation from college, he moved to Eastern Oklahoma State College where he took a position as Instructor in Botany and Agronomy. In the course of conducting botany field trips and working with local residents on their plant problems, the author became increasingly interested in the flora of that area and of the State of Oklahoma. This led to an extensive study of the northern portion of the Oauchita Highlands with collections currently numbering approximately 4,200. The specimens have been processed according to standard herbarium procedures. The first set has been placed in the Herbarium of Oklahoma State University with the second set going to Eastern Oklahoma State College at Wilburton. Editor’s note: The original species list included habitat characteristics and collection notes. These are omitted here but are available in the dissertation housed at the Edmon-Low Library at OSU or in digital form by request to the editor. [SS] PHYSICAL FEATURES Winding Stair Mountain ranges. A second large valley lies across the southern part of Location and Area Latimer and LeFlore counties between the The area studied is located primarily in Winding Stair and Kiamichi mountain the Ouachita Highlands of eastern ranges.
    [Show full text]