DOCSLIB.ORG

North Slope Borough Federal Tax ID: 92-0042378 Project Title: Project Type: Maintenance and Repairs North Slope Borough - Critical Infrastructure Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Slope Borough Federal Tax ID: 92-0042378 Project Title: Project Type: Maintenance and Repairs North Slope Borough - Critical Infrastructure Protection Total Project Snapshot Report 2013 Legislature TPS Report 60238v1 Agency: Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities (AS 37.05.315) Grant Recipient: North Slope Borough Federal Tax ID: 92-0042378 Project Title: Project Type: Maintenance and Repairs North Slope Borough - Critical Infrastructure Protection State Funding Requested: $6,000,000 House District: 40 / T Future Funding May Be Requested Brief Project Description: This project will provide funding for the design and permitting of revetment to protect essential infrastructure in Barrow and Point Hope. Funding Plan: Total Project Cost: $80,000,000 Funding Already Secured: ($0) FY2014 State Funding Request: ($6,000,000) Project Deficit: $74,000,000 Funding Details: No funds have been appropriated in prior years. Detailed Project Description and Justification: This project will provide beginning funding for the design, permitting, and construction of revetment to protect essential infrastructure in Barrow and Point Hope. The North Slope Borough has an established beach nourishment program, however more permanent solutions need to be pursued in order to continue providing critical services to residents. The extended periods of open water and increased number of severe storms are overtaking current efforts, leading to flooding of low lying areas, and potential permanent damage to assets essential in provision of public services. Revetment off the coast of Barrow will provide additional protection to the coast line, reducing flood related damage and protecting public and private property. The 12-foot option was determined as the best course of action based on the 100 year storm mark, where in 1963 12-foot swells did significant damage to the city. Revetment off of Point Hope will be used to protect the airport and runway. The airport provides the only year-round access to Point Hope. The airport is essential for the transport of goods, services, residents and for the provision of emergency medical services. The value of the North Slope Borough owned assets potentially protected by the revetment in Barrow is estimated at over $600 million dollars. This amount does not include the cost of providing services through alternate means (water, sewer, etc.) that would be required in an event generating surf similar to the 1963 storm. The value of protected private assets in the same area exceeds $600 million dollars. For use by Co-chair Staff Only: Page 1 Contact Name: Staff to Rep. Nageak $1,700,000 Contact Number: 4653473 Approved 2:01 PM 5/9/2013 Total Project Snapshot Report 2013 Legislature TPS Report 60238v1 Project Timeline: Design and construction in the amount shown will require a 2 - 3 year period. Entity Responsible for the Ongoing Operation and Maintenance of this Project: North Slope Borough Grant Recipient Contact Information: Name: John Bitney Title: State Government Liaison Address: 326 4th Street, Mendenhall #308 Juneau, Alaska 99801 Phone Number: (907)317-0038 Email: [email protected] Has this project been through a public review process at the local level and is it a community priority? X Yes No For use by Co-chair Staff Only: Page 2 Contact Name: Staff to Rep. Nageak Contact Number: 4653473 2:01 PM 5/9/2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District Barrow, Alaska Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Technical Report Appendix B – Real Estate Plan March 2007 Technical Report Barrow, Alaska, Storm Damage Reduction Appendix B – Draft Real Estate Plan NOTE: This Appendix was originally created as the Draft Real Estate Plan (REP) for an early version of the Draft Integrated Interim Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement for Coastal Storm Damage Reduction at Borrow, Alaska. That document underwent Independent Technical Review. As a result of that review, basic hydraulic and economic analyses were redone, with the result that no alternative yielded positive National Economic Development benefits greater than the costs of implementing that alternative. Since there is no Federal action proposed in this Technical Report, there is no need for a formal Real Estate Plan. However, since the draft REP had compiled information on real estate, it is included for information only . REAL ESTATE PLAN BARROW STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT BARROW, ALASKA 26 March 2007 1. Purpose This study was authorized by a resolution adopted 2 December 1970 by the House Public Works Committee. The resolution, known as the “Rivers and Harbors in Alaska” resolution, reads in part: Resolved by the Committee on Public Works of the House of Representatives, United States, that the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is hereby requested to review the reports of the Chief of Engineers on Rivers and Harbors in Alaska, published as House Document Numbered 414, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session…and other pertinent reports, with a view to determining whether any modifications contained herein are advisable at the present time… The purpose of this study is to determine the Federal interest in providing storm damage reduction, flood damage reduction and navigation improvements at Barrow, Alaska; to identify a non-federal sponsor willing to share in the cost of the feasibility study; and to develop a Project Management Plan (PMP) for a feasibility-level study. Barrow, the northern most community in North America and the economic center for the North Slope Borough, is located on the Arctic Ocean about 750 miles (mi) north of Anchorage, Alaska. Barrow is a first-class city with about 4,400 residents. The North Slope Borough, which includes almost all of Alaska north of the 68th Parallel, has a population of about 9,600 persons spread over 95,000 mi2, an area about the size of the state of Oregon. The majority of residents are Inupiat Eskimos. Barrow is located on a southwest-northeast coastline of the Chukchi Sea about 10 mi southwest of Point Barrow, the northernmost point of land in Alaska (Figure 1). Point Barrow is located on a spit fronting Elson Lagoon and marks the boundary between the Chukchi Sea on the west and the Beaufort Sea on the east. Page 1 2. Project Description For the purposes of this study, the protection plan includes the entire 25,000 foot-long shoreline under attack, including Barrow, Browerville, and the sewage lagoon/landfill area. The construction of shore protection at the sites shown on figure 3 combined with the placement of nourishment and wave absorption beach fill shown at locations on the same figure should protect the City of Barrow, the sewage lagoon, and the landfill from erosion. Page 2 3. Real Estate Requirements for the Project: Summary of Required Real Estate Interests for Storm Damage Reduction Revetment: Project Feature Areas Required Owner Estate Minimum Revetment 14.62 acres Municipal Perpetual easement Public Private (5 lots) A temporary construction staging area might be required but has not been identified at this time. 4. Within an existing Federal Project There are no existing, authorized Corps of Engineers (Corps) or other Federal water projects within the proposed project area. 5. Federally/Government Owned Land included There is no federally owned land included in the project area. There is local government land included in the project area. 6. LER below MHW/OHW – availability of Navigation Servitude Navigation servitude is available however the MHW is 0.40 ft. Since it appears the project will lie entirely above MHW, navigation servitude may not need to be exercised. 7. Map of Project area is Attached as Exhibit A. 8. Potential flooding induced by construction, operation or maintenance of project The intent of the project is to control flooding to low lying areas affected by storm surges. 9. Real Estate and Administrative Cost Estimate: Table II Federal project portions Item Federal Local Subtotal Total Administration $50,000 $50,000 $000 $000 Real Estate Cost (Land) -0- $95,000 -0- -0- 10. Relocation Assistance (PL 91-646) There are no relocation assistant benefits anticipated for this project. 11. Mineral Activity There is no known mineral activity occurring within the lands required for the project. Page 3 12. Non-Federal sponsor’s acquisition experience: Assessment attached as Exhibit B. 13. Real Estate Acquisition Schedule: COE NFS Activity Initiate – Complete Initiate - Complete Execution of PCA 1 day Formal transmittal of final ROW drawings 1 week after PCA to LS and instruction to acquire LER Mapping, legal descriptions, title evidence 3 months (minimum) Conduct appraisals, negotiations & closing 6-9 months 1 week upon 1 week upon receipt Certify availability of LER for construction completion of of NFS certification acquisition 14. Relocations (Facilities and Utilities) There are no known facilities and/or utilities that will have to be relocated. 15. Environmental / HTW There are no known hazardous and/or toxic waste on the land required for the project. 16. Known or Anticipated Support or Opposition of Landowners in project area Based upon available information, landowner support appears to be good. 17. Other RE issues relevant to planning, design, or implementation of the project Another alternative may be considered for relocation of the town. Page 4 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District Barrow, Alaska Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Technical Report Appendix C -- Cost Estimate September 2008 APPENDIX C COST ESTIMATE Technical Report for Barrow, Alaska Coastal Storm Damage Reduction BARROW COST ESTIMATING APPENDIX - SEP 2008 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Cost Estimating Appendix describes the technical cost aspects of the Barrow Coastal Storm Damage Reduction study. 1.1 HISTORY For the Preliminary Draft Interim Feasibility Report, the alternatives selected for further consideration consist of combinations of two initial alternatives, Coastal Dike and Bluff Revetment. The Coastal Dike portion was a 8,700-foot-long rock dike, with a crest of +20.5 ft (as shown in Figure 49 in Hydraulic Appendix), constructed of approximately 67,500 cubic yard (cy) of armor rock, 48,300 cy of B rock, 18,000 cy of core rock, and an estimated construction cost of $46.6 million.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate
    Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Alaska Sea Grant College Program University of Alaska Fairbanks SG-ED-75 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Cataloging in Publication Data: Smith, Orson P. Responses to coastal erosion in Alaska in a changing climate : a guide for coastal residents, business and resource managers, engineers, and builders / Orson P. Smith ; Mikal K. Hendee. – Fairbanks, Alaska : Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2011. p.: ill., maps ; cm. - (Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks ; SG-ED-75) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Coast changes—Alaska—Guidebooks. 2. Shore protection—Alaska—Guidebooks. 3. Beach erosion—Alaska—Guidebooks. 4. Coastal engineering—Alaska—Guidebooks. I. Title. II. Hendee, Mikal K. III. Series: Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks; SG-ED-75. TC330.S65 2011 ISBN 978-1-56612-165-1 doi:10.4027/rceacc.2011 © Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. All rights reserved. Credits This book, SG-ED-75, is published by the Alaska Sea Grant College Program, supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant Office, grant NA10OAR4170097, projects A/75-02 and A/161-02; and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and technology transfer for the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulation of Territorial Action Plans for Coastal Protection and Management
    this project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund Eu project COASTANCE FINAL REPORT phase C Component 4 Territorial Action Plans for coastal protection and management Formulation of territorial Action Plans for coastal protection and management 96 95 94 93 PARTNERSHIP Region of Eastern Macedonia & Thrace (GR) - Lead Partner Regione Lazio (IT) Region of Crete (GR) Département de l’Hérault (FR) Regione Emlia-Romagna (IT) Junta de Andalucia (ES) The Ministry of Communications & Works of Cyprus (CY) Dubrovnik Neretva County Regional Development Agency (HR) a publication edit by Direzione Generale Ambiente e Difesa del Suolo e della Costa Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica responsibles Roberto Montanari, Christian Marasmi - Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica editor and graphic Christian Marasmi authors Roberto Montanari, Christian Marasmi - Regione Emilia-Romagna, Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica Mentino Preti, Margherita Aguzzi, Nunzio De Nigris, Maurizio Morelli - ARPA Emilia-Romagna, Unità Specialistica Mare e Costa Maurizio Farina - Servizio Tecnico Bacino Po di Volano e della Costa Michael Aftias, Eleni Chouli - Ydronomi, Consulting Engineers Philippe Carbonnel, Alexandre Richard - Département de l’Hérault INDEX Background and strategic framework 2 The COASTANCE project 6 Component 4 strategy framework 8 Component 4 results: coastal and sediment management plans 10 Relevance of project’s outputs and results in the EU policy framework and perspectives 10 Limits and difficulties
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Cultures of Fishing Communities
    When Fish is Water: Food Security and Fish in a Coastal Community in The Dominican Republic Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard, W. Publisher Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Download date 08/10/2021 00:41:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/292622 Understanding the cultures of fishing communities A key to fisheries management and food security Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Cover photo: Small -scale fishing community, West Indies, by J.R. McGoodwin FAO Understanding the cultures of FISHERIES TECHNICAL fishing communities PAPER A key to fisheries management 401 and food security by James R. McGoodwin Professor Department of Anthropology University of Colorado Boulder, USA Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2001 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92 -5- 104606 -9 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non -commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing and Multimedia Service, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e -mail to copyright @fao.org © FAO 2001 111 PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT The Fishery Policy and Planning Division of the FAO Fisheries Department regularly publishes technical documentation relevant for fisheries policy planning and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Design of Coastal Structures (Seadikes, Revetments, Breakwaters and Groins)
    Note: Stability of coastal structures Date: August 2016 www.leovanrijn-sediment.com STABILITY DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES (SEADIKES, REVETMENTS, BREAKWATERS AND GROINS) by Leo C. van Rijn, www.leovanrijn-sediment.com, The Netherlands August 2016 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HYDRODYNAMIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS AND PROCESSES 2.1 Basic boundary conditions 2.2 Wave height parameters 2.2.1 Definitions 2.2.2 Wave models 2.2.3 Design of wave conditions 2.2.4 Example wave computation 2.3 Tides, storm surges and sea level rise 2.3.1 Tides 2.3.2 Storm surges 2.3.3 River floods 2.3.4 Sea level rise 2.4 Wave reflection 2.5 Wave runup 2.5.1 General formulae 2.5.2 Effect of rough slopes 2.5.3 Effect of composite slopes and berms 2.5.4 Effect of oblique wave attack 2.6 Wave overtopping 2.6.1 General formulae 2.6.2 Effect of rough slopes 2.6.3 Effect of composite slopes and berms 2.6.4 Effect of oblique wave attack 2.6.5 Effect of crest width 2.6.6 Example case 2.7 Wave transmission 1 Note: Stability of coastal structures Date: August 2016 www.leovanrijn-sediment.com 3 STABILITY EQUATIONS FOR ROCK AND CONCRETE ARMOUR UNITS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Critical shear-stress method 3.2.1 Slope effects 3.2.2 Stability equations for stones on mild and steep slopes 3.3 Critical wave height method 3.3.1 Stability equations; definitions 3.3.2 Stability equations for high-crested conventional breakwaters 3.3.3 Stability equations for high-crested berm breakwaters 3.3.4 Stability equations for low-crested, emerged breakwaters and groins 3.3.5 Stability equations for submerged breakwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Contents
    3 Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CIRIA C683 63 3 Materials CHAPTER 3 CONTENTS 3.1 Introduction. 71 3.1.1 Materials considerations for concept stage. 72 3.1.1.1 Scale of project . 72 3.1.1.2 Planning and timescales . 73 3.1.1.3 Top sizes of armour . 73 3.1.1.4 Rock source and procurement options . 73 3.1.1.5 Holistic considerations . 74 3.1.1.6 Cost of project. 76 3.1.1.7 Towards preliminary design. 76 3.1.2 Important design functions and properties of materials. 79 3.1.2.1 Functions of materials in the structure . 79 3.1.2.2 Material properties . 81 3.1.3 Durability considerations . 82 3.1.3.1 Mitigation strategies for low-durability scenarios of rock armour . 83 3.1.3.2 Durability considerations for material other than armourstone. 83 3.1.4 Standards for armourstone. 84 3.2 Quarried rock – overview of properties and functions. 86 3.2.1 Introduction to quarried rock . 86 3.2.2 Introduction to engineering geology . 86 3.2.3 Quarry evaluation principles . 91 3.2.4 Properties and functions – general. 94 3.3 Quarried rock – intrinsic properties . 95 3.3.1 Aesthetic properties of armourstone . 95 3.3.2 Petrographic properties . 95 3.3.3 Mass density, porosity and water absorption . 95 3.3.3.1 Phase relations . 95 3.3.3.2 Density definitions . 96 3.3.3.3 Degree of saturation in stability calculations . 97 3.3.3.4 Density variation in a quarry .
    [Show full text]
  • North Slope Subsistence Study Barrow 1988 .1
    I '~ .1 OCS Study i MMS 89-0077 I North Slope Subsistence Study ! Barrow 1988 Social and Economic Studies u.s..Department of the Interior •• ~ Minerals Management Service ,r,rlQ Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region OCSSTUDY MMS 89-0077 Technical Report No. 135 CONTRACT NO. 14-12-0001-30284 NORTH SLOPE SUBSISTENCE STUDY BARROW, 1988 Submitted To U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region Anchorage, Alaska Prepared By Stephen R. Braund & Associates with Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage December 1989 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This report has been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Alaska OCS Environmental Studies Program North Slope Subsistence Study - Barrow, 1988 Princioal Authors: Stephen R. Braund Timothy P. Holmes John A. Kruse Lisa Moorehead Eve Witten David C. Burnham Sam Stoker Stephen R. Braund & Associates P.O. Box 1480 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, we wish to extend our thanks to the study households who have shared so willingly their time on this project. Without their voluntary cooperation a study of this nature would be impossible. We also recognize the important contributions of Ernest S.
    [Show full text]
  • Riprap Slope Protection Phase 4 (Final)
    Design Standards No. 13 Embankment Dams Chapter 7: Riprap Slope Protection Phase 4 (Final) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation May 2014 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Design Standards Signature Sheet Design Standards No. 13 Embankment Dams DS-13(7)-2.1: Phase 4 (Final) May 2014 Chapter 7: Riprap Slope Protection Revision Number OS-13(7)-2.1 Summary of revisions: In the rollout presentation of the Riprap Design Standard, Chapter 7, Bobby Rinehart of the labs commented that ASTM standards are now being used as much, or more than, USBR laboratory testing procedures. Therefore, the ASTM test procedure numbers should be included in the Design Standard. The ASTM Standard Test Numbers will be added to the Riprap Quality Tests along with the currently cited only with USBR designations test numbers. These are in section 7.2.5, pages 10 and 11, and will be rewritten as follows: o Specific gravity (ASTM C127, USBR 4127) o Absorption (ASTM C127, USBR 4127) o Sodium sulfate soundness (ASTM C88, ASTM D5240, USBR 4088) o Los Angeles abrasion (ASTM C131, ASTM C535, USBR 4131) o Freeze-thaw durability (ASTM D5312, USBR 4666) Prepared by: Robert L. Dewey, P. Date Technical Specialist, Geotechnical Engineering Group 3, 86-68313 Peer Review: Jack Gagliardi, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete Armour Units for Rubble Mound
    ftt*attlsReserctt Mhlingrford CONCRETEARMOUR UNITS FOR RUBBLE MOUNDBREAKWATERS AND SEA WALLS: RECENTPROGRESS N I.f H Allsop BSc, C Eng, MICE Report SR 100 March 1988 Registered Office: Hydriulics Research Wallingford, Oxfordshire OXIO 8BA. Telephone: (X91 35381. Telex: 84.8552 This report describes work jointly funded by the Department of the Environment and the l,linistry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. The Department of the Environment contract number was PECD7 16152 for which the nominated officer rras Dr R P Thorogood. The Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food contribution was lrithin the Research Connission (Marine Flooding) CSA 557 for which the nominated officer was l{r A J ALlison. The work was carried out in the Maritime Engineering Department of Hydraulice Research, lfall-ingford under the rnanagementof Dr S I,l Huntington. The report is published on behalf of both DoE and I'|AFF, but any opinions expressed in this report are not necesearily those of the funding Departments. @ Crown copyright 1988 Publiehed by permission of the Controller of lter Majestyts Stationery Office. Goncrete,armour "unite.for' rubble mound breakwaters, sea val,ls and. revetuentsS recent :pfogf,eas, N lJ H Alleop Report SR 100, ilarch 1988 Eydraulics Reeearch, Wallingford Abetract ilany deep water breakrvatera constructed in,the laet 2O-50 years are of rubble sound construction, proteeted againat the effects of rave aetion by concrete armour nnite. Ttrese units are oftea of complex ehape; Ttrey are generally produced in unreinforced concrete ia eizee between around 2-50 tonnea depending apon the local water depth, the eeverity of the locel save eonditione, and on the efficiencl and: stsbiiity of the unit type selected.
    [Show full text]
  • North Slope Communications Protocol
    Exhibit 17 ICAS Petition North Slope Communications Protocol Communication Guidelines to Support Meaningful Involvement of the North Slope Communities in EPA Decision-Making May 2009 Exhibit 17 ICAS Petition 4 2.0 Communication with North Slope Communities Region 10 Protocol Statement: Region 10 will: • Maintain and improve our working relationships with communities on the North Slope of Alaska, • Use communication strategies that take into account the cultural context of the North Slope communities, • Communicate early both internally and with North Slope communities as soon as Region 10 staff learn of a proposed project or issue. Implementing the Protocol: Region 10 will use communication strategies that take into account the cultural context of the North Slope communities by adapting our communications to the values and practices of those communities. In this way, Region 10 will practice culturally appropriate communications for each project related to the North Slope. For each project (or project category) related to the North Slope, there must be a deliberate consideration of whether there is a need to prepare and implement a formal communications strategy. If a formal strategy is not deemed necessary, the Protocol must still be implemented by the program. Communication with North Slope communities can begin as soon as EPA learns of a project (perhaps even before an application is received, for example). This requires EPA program staff to communicate regularly with each other concerning their activities on the North Slope. Development of a communication strategy can also begin as soon as EPA learns of a project. Routine and open communication with the communities is an integral part of the entire project process, beginning at project inception, not from the start of the comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Climate Change Hazards in Coastal Areas
    CATALOGUE OF HAZARD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS CI-12 CI-11 CI-10 TSR CI-9 CI-8 PL-1 PL-2 PL-3 CI-7 PL-4 CI-6 PL-5 4 4 3 PL-6 CI-5 2 4 2 4 3 PL-7 CI-4 4 4 PL-8 2 4 4 3 3 PL-9 4 3 2 3 2 3 CI-3 3 3 3 2 PL-10 2 2 3 3 2 3 CI-2 4 2 3 3 4 PL-11 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 PL-12 CI-1 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 3 2 3 PL-13 2 3 3 4 2 1 1 3 3 2 R-4 3 4 3 4 4 Tidal inlet/Sand spit/River mouth 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 PL-14 R-3 3 4 4 4 2 2 4 3 4 3 4 2 3 3 PL-15 R-2 1 3 4 4 N Y N 4 2 4 4 Y N Y Y N 4 2 3 3 3 PL-16 R-1 1 2 4 N Y N 2 4 Y Y 4 2 2 2 PL-17 1 1 1 4 4 N N 2 FR-22 Y Y 4 4 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 4 N N PL-18 FR-21 1 4 Y Y 4 2 2 3 1 1 N N 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 3 3 PL-19 FR-20 1 Y Sur B/D Sur Y 2 4 3 3 1 1 A B/D B/D N 2 PL-20 2 Sur Sur 4 1 FR-19 1 3 1 A B/D Y 4 2 2 2 A B/D N 4 3 1 PL-21 1 3 4 Sur Sur 2 2 3 FR-18 3 2 A Y 2 3 1 3 4 B/D N 2 PL-22 2 N B B/D 2 3 2 FR-17 2 3 NB Y 4 3 1 3 Y Sur 4 2 PL-23 2 3 N B Any N 3 FR-16 3 3 NB Any Any 4 1 1 Y Any Intermit B/D Y 4 3 2 PL-24 2 2 1 2 1 FR-15 3 Any Any marsh N 2 BA-1 2 1 N Intermit Sur 2 4 2 C 2 4 3 2 3 Y Any mangr Y 2 FR-14 2 4 A 4 BA-2 3 Marsh/ B/D N 2 3 2 4 N C Any Any 1 3 1 Any Any Any tidal at Y 3 FR-13 2 3 Y 1 2 4 BA-3 3 4 M/M Any Sur 3 1 Micro N 4 BA-4 FR-12 2 3 N B Mangr/ 1 1 3 2 4 No Any B/D 2 2 2 2 Y tidal at Y 1 1 BA-5 FR-11 3 1 P Ex Meso/ 3 4 3 N NB Mx Mx N 4 2 2 3 Any Ex macro Sur 2 3 1 C A Y 3 BA-6 FR-10 Y P Any 3 3 2 1 2 B 2 3 3 1 B/D N N P Coral Any 4 3 3 BA-7 FR-9 3 1 R 2 2 2 3 1 NB Any Any isl Sediment Y Y Ex Any Sur 2 2 2 1 2 BA-8 FR-8 2 2 2 3 4 Mx plain Any N N Flat Mx B Y 4 4 4 3 4 BA-9 FR-7 3 2
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 01/10/2021 05:39:21
    What I'm Waiting For Item Type Thesis Authors Simpson, Sheryl Ann Download date 01/10/2021 05:39:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/8521 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. H ie qualityof this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, prim bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]