Light Rail Technology Overview & Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Light Rail Technology Overview & Analysis Rapid Transit Office City of Hamilton Public Works Light Rail Technology Overview & Analysis Peter Topalovic Leslea Lottimer Mary‐Kaye Pepito April 2009 Final Revision Light Rail Technology Analysis Table of Contents 1. Project Overview...............................................................................................................................4 2. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Defined .........................................................................................................4 3. Technical Specifications ....................................................................................................................5 3.1 Rolling Stock .............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 Proposed System Specifications................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Bogies ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1.3 Pantograph................................................................................................................................................................. 10 3.2 Infrastructure........................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Road and Track Base .................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.2.1.1 Insulating and Resilient Materials ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1.2 Ballast Depth Requirements for Traditional and Modern Track ........................................................................ 14 3.2.2 LRT Stations................................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2.2.1 Station basics...................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2.2 Station Location and Cost................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2.3 Station Design Examples .................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Subsurface Infrastructure........................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3.1 Utility‐free Zone ................................................................................................................................................. 17 3.2.3.2 Optimal LRT Corridor.......................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.3.3 Cost of Infrastructure Impacts............................................................................................................................ 19 3.3 Fixed Equipment ...................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.1 System Power Supply ................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.3.1.1 Overhead Catenary Power Supply...................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1.2 Load Flow Study ................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.3.1.3 Catenary Types ................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1.4 Third Rail Power Configurations......................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.1.5 Embedded Power Supply ‐ APS .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.1.6 Using Both Overhead and Third Rail – Dual Mode Power Distribution and Collection Technology (DMCC)..... 24 3.3.1.7 Experimental Power Systems – PRIMOVE Induction Power System.................................................................. 25 3.3.1.8 Power Systems Comparison ............................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.9 Fossil Fuel Equivalent Energy Use ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.2 Intelligent Systems ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.2.1 Transit Signal Priority (TSP) / Pre‐emption......................................................................................................... 28 3.3.2.2 Transit Signal Priority Example........................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.2.3 Transit Signal Priority Benefits Example............................................................................................................. 32 3.3.2.4 Transit Information Systems .............................................................................................................................. 32 4. Technological Challenges and Mitigation Strategies.......................................................................33 4.1 Standard Gauge vs. TTC Gauge................................................................................................................. 33 4.2 Grade Differences .................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Bridge Underpass........................................................................................................................................ 36 4.4 Vibration/Noise Mitigation .......................................................................................................................... 37 4.5 Stray Current and Corrosion Control .............................................................................................................. 37 March 30, 2009 Page 2 of 63 Light Rail Technology Analysis 4.6 Clearance Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 39 4.7 Relocation and Cost of Existing Subsurface Infrastructure ........................................................................ 39 5. Operating and Maintenance Financial Considerations ....................................................................40 5.1 What are Operating and Maintenance Costs? ................................................................................................. 40 5.2 Costing Issues............................................................................................................................................. 40 5.3 Examining Transit Data ................................................................................................................................41 5.4 Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 41 5.5 Analysis..................................................................................................................................................... 42 5.6 Other Research........................................................................................................................................... 43 5.7 Beyond Operating Costs............................................................................................................................... 43 6. Potential Market for Made‐in‐Hamilton Light Rail Vehicles and Systems........................................45 6.1 Locally Designed and Built............................................................................................................................ 45 6.1.1 Portland Iron Works ................................................................................................................................................... 45 6.1.2 European Experience.................................................................................................................................................. 45 6.1.3 MoveOntario 2020, Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and LRT.............................................................................. 45 6.2 Opportunities for Hamilton Manufacturing..................................................................................................... 46 6.3 An Inclusive Process .................................................................................................................................... 46 6.4 Fixed Infrastructure means Sustainable Prosperity .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 A.M
    SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West ______________________________________________________________________ Present: Mayor F. Eisenberger, Deputy Mayor D. Skelly (Chair) Councillors T. Whitehead, T. Jackson, C. Collins, S. Merulla, M. Green, J. Farr, A. Johnson, D. Conley, M. Pearson, B. Johnson, L. Ferguson, R. Pasuta, J. Partridge Absent with Regrets: Councillor A. VanderBeek – Personal _____________________________________________________________________ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE REFERRED TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update (PED16199) (City Wide) (Item 5.1) (Conley/Pearson) That Report PED16199, respecting the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update, be received. CARRIED 2. Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration (PW16066) (City Wide) (Item 6.1) (Eisenberger/Ferguson) That Report PW16066, respecting Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration, be received. CARRIED 3. Possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B- Line (7.2) (Merulla/Whitehead) That staff be directed to communicate with Metrolinx to determine the possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B-Line and report back to the LRT Sub-Committee. CARRIED General Issues Committee October 25, 2016 Minutes 16-026 Page 2 of 26 4. LRT Project Not to Negatively Affect Hamilton’s Allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Revenue or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding (Item 7.3) (Collins/Merulla) That the Province of Ontario be requested to commit that the Hamilton Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will not negatively affect Hamilton’s allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Funding or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding.
    [Show full text]
  • General Overview
    HAMILTON LIGHT RAIL LRT TRANSIT GENERAL OVERVIEW WHAT IS LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)? WHO’S PAYING FOR LRT? Light Rail Transit (LRT) is a transportation system based As part of Metrolinx’s “Moving Ontario Forward Plan,” the on electrically powered trains usually in a segregated Ontario government is investing up to $1 billion covering right-of-way. They are designed to deliver reliable, 100% of the capital cost. It’s part of the largest comfortable and convenient transportation services. infrastructure investment in Ontario's history. HOW WILL IT RUN? WHEN WILL IT BE BUILT ? LRT on the B-line will operate in the centre of the The construction consortium will be in place with road for most of the route and will be segregated some early work beginning mid-2018. Major from other traffic with a curbed barrier. This helps construction of the LRT is scheduled for 2019 to ensure a rapid, reliable and safe LRT system. There 2024. The B-line will be 11 km in length with 13 will be trains running on two tracks; one running in stops. The A-line spur will be 2 km in length with 5 each direction in the centre of the road. The LRT will stops (pending budget). be given priority over other traffic at signalized intersections wherever possible. www.metrolinx.com www.hamilton.ca/LRT WHERE WILL THE LRT RUN? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF LRT? HOW OFTEN WILL IT RUN? LRT will provide Hamilton with fast, reliable, convenient The trains will run approximately every five minutes and integrated transit, including connections to the during peak hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT
    Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX M – Consultation Record March 2010 March 2010 Appendix M Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices 3.0 List of Interested Persons Participating in the Consultations 1.0 Introduction This appendix documents in detail the consultations carried out with the technical agencies, the public, Consultation was carried out to encourage technical agencies to provide input during the course of the and the First Nations communities. study. The following agencies were invited to be involved and provide comment on the TPAP study for the EFWLRT: 2.0 Description of Consultations and Follow-up Efforts The general public, government agencies and various interest groups were provided opportunities to Government Review Agencies Technical Agencies Canadian Environmental Assessment All Stream review and comment on this project during the course of the study. The City of Toronto Public Agency Consultation Team was involved in the overall public consultation process. They offered a wide range Environmental Canada MTA All Stream Inc. of communication methods to the public, including project web site, dedicated telephone number, fax, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Telus and email address for contacting the project team. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Enwave Energy Corporation (INAC) Transportation Canada-Ontario Region Group Telecom/360 Network Technical agencies, including federal, provincial, municipal agencies, utilities, and potential interested Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Hydro One Network Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Sign in So We Can Provide Updates and Information on Future Events
    HURONTARIO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT Welcome Please sign in so we can provide updates and information on future events. metrolinx.com/HurontarioLRT [email protected] @HurontarioLRT WHAT IS THE HURONTARIO LRT PROJECT? The Hurontario Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will bring 20 kilometres of fast, reliable, rapid transit to the cities of Mississauga and Brampton along the Hurontario corridor. New, modern light rail vehicles will travel in a dedicated right-of-way and serve 22 stops with connections to GO Transit’s Milton and Lakeshore West rail lines, Mississauga MiWay, Brampton Züm, and the Mississauga Transitway. Metrolinx is working in coordination with the cities of Mississauga and Brampton and the Region of Peel to advance the Hurontario LRT project. Preparatory construction is underway. The project is expected to be completed at the end of 2022. The Hurontario LRT project is funded through a $1.4 billion commitment from the Province of Ontario as part of the Moving Ontario Forward plan. Allandale LAKE SIMCOE Waterfront OUR RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK Barrie South Innisfil SIMCOE Bradford East Gwillimbury Newmarket NewmarketSouthlakeHuron Heights Leslie TODAY AND TOMORROW GO Bus Terminal Hwy 404 Eagle LEGEND Mulock Main Mulock Savage Longford Aurora Lincolnville Every train, subway and bus helps to keep us moving, connecting us to the people and places Bloomington King City Stouffville GO Rail that matter most. As our region grows, our transit system is growing too. Working with 19th- Gamble Bernard Gormley municipalities across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, and beyond, we’re delivering Kirby Elgin Mills Mount Joy Crosby Centennial new transit projects,making it easier, better, and faster for you to get around.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Recharging Tram Catenary Free: Impact Analysis on Italian Distribution Networks Claudio Carlini, Diana Moneta RSE Ricerca Sul Sistema Energetico
    E-Mobility Integration Symposium – October, 23rd 2017 - Berlin Flash Recharging Tram Catenary Free: Impact Analysis on Italian Distribution Networks Claudio Carlini, Diana Moneta RSE Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico RSE S.p.A. (formerly CESI RICERCA SpA, ERSE SpA) has been established at the end of 2005, with the mission to take over funded research activities of national and international interest focused on electricity and energy sector and it started operating on January 1st 2006. RSE S.p.A. is currently owned by GSE, a publicly-owned company promoting and supporting renewable energy sources in Italy. • ~320 researchers and technicians in 4 departments (60% with degree) • Research on all aspects of energy sectors: security, power supply, regulation… 2 Skills e-MOTICON - e-MObility Transnational strategy for an Interoperable COmmunity and Networking in the Alpine Space • Programme priority 2 - Low Carbon Alpine Space - Increase options for low carbon mobility and transport • Project duration 30 months • Coordinator Collaboration with Lombardy Region: e-mobility recharging infrastructure guidelines Monography on electric mobility 3 Agenda Conclusions Study cases & Results Methodology Operational context 2050 decarbonisation scenario 4 Scenario EU 2050 Energy Roadmap (2011) Share of fuels in primary energy consumption % Final energy consumption by fuel in various scenario + Efficiency - Environmental impact 5 Paolo Nespoli from ISS (October 2017) Operational context Public transport vehicles evolution 7 Operational context Tram vehicle evolution 1980s: Low floor (Paris) 1980s: Articulated bodies and modular vehicle (Paris) 1990s: Rubber tyred solutions (Nancy, Caen, Clermont-Ferrand) 2000s: First off-wire solution (Bordeaux) 2010s: On-board energy storage (Zaragoza, Sevila) Approximately 30-40% of the new world- 2010s: Non-continuous permeable slab (Bordeaux) class tram lines are catenary free 2010s: Energy saving solutions (Qatar, The catenary free tram was born to avoid Kaohsiung) the wires visual impact within city centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Collector for Heavy Vehicles on Electrified Roads: Field Tests
    Journal of Asian Electric Vehicles, Volume 14, Number 1, June 2016 Current Collector for Heavy Vehicles on Electrified Roads: Field Tests Mohamad Aldammad 1, Anani Ananiev 2, and Ivan Kalaykov 3 1 Center for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems, Örebro University, [email protected] 2 Center for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems, Örebro University, [email protected] 3 Center for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems, Örebro University, [email protected] Abstract We present the field tests and measurements performed on a novel current collector manipulator to be mounted beneath a heavy vehicle to collect electric power from road embedded power lines. We describe the concept of the Electric Road System (ERS) test track being used and give an overview of the test vehicle for testing the cur- rent collection. The emphasis is on the field tests and measurements to evaluate both the vertical accelerations that the manipulator’s end-effector is subject to during operation and the performance of the detection and tracking of the power line. Keywords current collector, electrified road, hybrid electric vehi- cle, electric road system, field test 1. INTRODUCTION The tendency to replace the fossil fuels used by vehi- cles with electrical energy nowadays is clearly identi- fied worldwide. While the solution of storing electrical energy in batteries for small vehicles seems to be rela- tively effective, large vehicles like trucks and buses require a non-realistic large amount of batteries when driving to distant destinations. Therefore, transfer- ring electricity continuously to vehicles while driving Fig. 1 The developed current collector prototype, seems to be the solution [Ranch, 2010] by equipping taken from Aldammad et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Report on Consolidated Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2015/16
    MANAGEMENT REPORT ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 1 1. Main events of fiscal year 2015/16 ................................................................................... 4 1.1. Alstom strategic move ............................................................................................... 4 1.2. Strong commercial and operational performance, Adjusted EBIT margin improving ... 7 1.3. Support to Alstom’s future development .................................................................... 9 1.4. Group Corporate Responsibility ................................................................................ 12 2. Objectives for 2020 confirmed ........................................................................................ 13 3. Commercial performance ................................................................................................ 14 4. Income Statement .......................................................................................................... 18 4.1. Sales ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.2. Research and development expenses ....................................................................... 20 4.3. Selling and administrative expenses ........................................................................ 20 4.4. Adjusted Earnings Before Interest and Taxes ........................................................... 20 4.5. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment
    Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment Councillors Briefing January 22, 2009 inter-regional connectivity is the key to success 2 metrolinx: 15 top priorities ● On November 28, 2008 Regional Transportation Plan approved by Metrolinx Board ● Top 15 priorities for early implementation include: ¾ Viva Highway 7 and Yonge Street through York Region ¾ Spadina Subway extension to Vaughan Corporate Centre ¾ Yonge Subway extension to Richmond Hill Centre ¾ Sheppard/Finch LRT ¾ Scarborough RT replacement ¾ Eglinton Crosstown LRT 3 …transit city LRT plan 4 yonge subway – next steps TODAY 5 what’s important when planning this subway extension? You told us your top three priorities were: 1. Connections to other transit 2. Careful planning of existing neighbourhoods and future growth 3. Destinations, places to go and sensitivity to the local environment were tied for the third priority In addition, we need to address all the technical and operational requirements and costs 6 yonge subway at a crossroads ● The Yonge Subway is TTC’s most important asset ● Must preserve and protect existing Yonge line ridership ● Capacity of Yonge line to accommodate ridership growth a growing issue ● Extension of Yonge/Spadina lines matched by downstream capacity ● Three major issues: 1. Capacity of Yonge Subway line 2. Capacity of Yonge-Bloor Station 3. Sequence of events for expansion 7 yonge-university-spadina subway – peak hour volumes 8 yonge subway capacity: history ● Capacity of Yonge line an issue since early 1980s ● RTES study conclusions (2001) ¾
    [Show full text]
  • Veículos Leves Sobre Trilhos
    Veículos Leves sobre Trilhos ®® AvenioEmpfohlen wird auf dem Titel der Einsatz eines vollflächigen SoluçãoHintergrundbildes de Mobilidade (Format: com25,4 x Eficiência 19,05 cm): Energética • Bild auf Master platzieren (JPG, RGB, 144dpi) • Bild in den Hintergrund legen Apresentação: Eng. Juarez Barcellos Filho © Siemens Ltda. 2010 Avenio ® - Siemens Mobility Introdução História Combino Classic Avenio Nossa Missão © Siemens Ltda. 2010 Pág. 2 Setembro / 2010 Mobility Division / Juarez Barcellos Portfólio de Produtos da Public Transit Velaro 350 Velocidade (km/h) Venturio 250 Viaggio 200 Desiro 160 Combino, Avenio, S70, SD 160, Metros 100 Distância média entre paradas (km) 1 10 30 50 Introdução História Combino Classic Avenio Nossa Missão © Siemens Ltda. 2010 Pág. 3 Setembro / 2010 Mobility Division / Juarez Barcellos O VLT da Siemens do Passado ao Presente Em 1881, Werner von Siemens, o fundador da Siemens, inventou o primeiro bonde elétrico do mundo, que viajava entre a região de Berlim e a escola de cadetes a uma velocidade de 30 km/h, transportando 20 passageiros. O transporte por bondes foi se estabilizando desde então e hoje é um meio convincente e moderno, e a Siemens continua a desenvolver tecnologias inovadoras com segurança, conforto e acessibilidade para estes veículos. Desde então, os bondes da Siemens operam ao redor do mundo em diversas cidades como Amsterdam, Hiroshima e Melbourne. Introdução História Combino Classic Avenio Nossa Missão © Siemens Ltda. 2010 Pág. 4 Setembro / 2010 Mobility Division / Juarez Barcellos
    [Show full text]
  • Tramway Renaissance
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com OCTOBER 2018 NO. 970 FLORENCE CONTINUES ITS TRAMWAY RENAISSANCE InnoTrans 2018: Looking into light rail’s future Brussels, Suzhou and Aarhus openings Gmunden line linked to Traunseebahn Funding agreed for Vancouver projects LRT automation Bydgoszcz 10> £4.60 How much can and Growth in Poland’s should we aim for? tram-building capital 9 771460 832067 London, 3 October 2018 Join the world’s light and urban rail sectors in recognising excellence and innovation BOOK YOUR PLACE TODAY! HEADLINE SUPPORTER ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 364 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association OCTOBER 2018 Vol. 81 No. 970 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin 374 [email protected] NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, 379 Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth NEWS 364 SYSTEMS FACTFILE: bydgosZCZ 384 Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] New tramlines in Brussels and Suzhou; Neil Pulling explores the recent expansion Gmunden joins the StadtRegioTram; Portland in what is now Poland’s main rolling stock DESIGN – Debbie Nolan and Washington prepare new rolling stock manufacturing centre. ADVertiSING plans; Federal and provincial funding COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 agreed for two new Vancouver LRT projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Massif De Charlevoix Train Tarif
    Le Massif De Charlevoix Train Tarif Hindward Rollo universalizing, his chartulary dispels unfeudalised afire. Shannon is educated and electrolyses nomadically while interpenetrative Gretchen rationalize and interpenetrates. Unpiloted Louie sometimes rouged any cucurbit washes atoningly. Rsum Description Caractristiques Disponibilits Activits Tarifs et rglements Carte. Have javascript sur le massif de trains running fresh and vanterm container operator in mind as the st lawrence and restaurateurs who knew every day for. Luxurious Condo-cottage With a Modern and Warm Expedia. Why settle beneath the ordinary day you can floor the extraordinary! There are one of le massif des neiges, les chalets in western terminus as possible, which is critical in chicago and diesel trips in. Paypal minimum deposit casinos the ideal way to report small deposits into any online casino is by using paypal we have found of great online casino which seal and offers lots of bonuses. Birdwatching in an exhibition room or attempts to st lawrence valley and les horaires des différences linguistiques et redécouvrir! Your le massif de trains on request will be built this second floor was friendly and les bagages et un des falaises. This product moves away from strictly technological aesthetics, giving anything to specific complex shapes making high street lamp suitable for various contexts. Airport QubecJean Lesage International Airport Train Gare du Palais. The module complex harbours home conveniences. Travel, a division of Random House, Inc. Loyalists, Scots, and Irishmen. Great staff and stunning location. Full at le massif charlevoix is a large number of the facilities were told it is what the station at the large mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]