Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX C - Existing and Future Traffic Operations March 2010 March 2010 Appendix C Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report It is assumed that with the introduction of the LRT in the median, the majority of the Finch Avenue West corridor will 1. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OF maintain two through lanes for general traffic in each direction. The exception is the section of Finch Avenue West in ETOBICOKE-FINCH WEST LRT CORRIDOR proximity to Highway 400, between Jane Street and Weston Road, where three lanes in each direction have been retained (except under the CPR structure just east of Weston Road, which will narrow to two traffic lanes in each direction). [The Highway 400 portion of Finch Avenue will be discussed later in this section, and, as noted, the Existing traffic conditions in the corridor have been analyzed using the Synchro 7 software program and its Sim-Traffic analysis is described in detail in Appendix E.] microsimulation component to model traffic behaviour on the streets and intersections of the study area. Due to the significance of the operations of the corridor at the interface with Highway 400, a separate detailed microsimulation The level of service for traffic at major intersections is expected to be lower (more congested) than at present with the was carried out in the vicinity of Highway 400 using the AIMSUN program. Results of this separate study are reported introduction of the LRT because of the additional U-turn traffic demand in left-turn lanes; the removal of bus bays, in Appendix E. which were de facto right-turn lanes; and the removal of “permissive” left-turn movements on Finch Avenue at signalized intersections as a safety feature for the LRT operation. The signal operations on all but the Highway 400 1.1 General configuration of traffic facilities in the corridor section of the Finch Avenue West LRT corridor have been analyzed using standard software (Synchro 7) with original traffic volumes and traffic signal timings provided by the City of Toronto. Intersection approaches are deemed to be at Existing lane configurations will be maintained by widening the curb-to-curb roadway to establish the new LRT capacity when the analysis reveals that the average vehicle delay is equal to or exceeds 55 seconds. This condition is trackway in the median. At some intersections, bus bays will be replaced by the relocated through lanes because bus commonly expressed as Level of Service (LOS) E and F. service will be replaced by the LRT service. These bus bays also function as short right-turn lanes when buses are not present, but right-turn lanes will not be provided in the future in order to: limit road widening impacts upon properties; protect opportunities for enhanced sidewalk, landscape and streetscape amenities, and to keep pedestrian crossing distances at intersections to the minimum width possible. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1.2 Traffic measurement All signalized intersections across the corridor were analyzed, including those mid-block and driveway intersections where LRT stations will not be located. Analysis results are illustrated later in this Appendix. All of the 13 intersections The traffic capacity and level of service for traffic on an arterial road is typically measured at major signalized that currently experience at-capacity traffic conditions on Finch Avenue West are expected to continue to do so once intersections during normal morning and evening weekday peak hours where the traffic signal timing (which controls the LRT is operational. An additional 8 intersections are also expected to be at-capacity under the future LRT conflicting movements of pedestrians, streetcars, bikes and other vehicles) represents a constraint to traffic flow. scenario, and are listed in the table below: When calculating the impacts of the LRT project on traffic capacity along the Finch Avenue West corridor, numerous Finch Avenue West Peak Hour Intersection Approaches At-Capacity assumptions have been made, which represent a “worst case scenario” for traffic operations: This method allows the disclosure of a theoretical maximum impact for EA purposes. Actual impacts may be less after mitigation and design Cross street Approach Existing Peak Hour With LRT Peak Hours interventions. Assumptions for the EFW LRT project and other TTC Transit City lines are as follows: Yonge Westbound AM AM and PM i) The volume of existing traffic will be unchanged in the future, minus Finch West buses; ii) Additional traffic generated by new, large, approved developments (at the time of the analysis) has been Yonge Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM added; Talbot Westbound AM iii) Traffic previously executing left-turn movements into or out of driveways and unsignalized intersections has been rerouted to adjacent signalized intersections as U-turn movements; Senlac Eastbound AM and PM iv) LRT vehicles will proceed with the through movement of general traffic on Finch Avenue; v) All left-turn and U-turn traffic manoeuvres from Finch Avenue West will only proceed with a “protected” green Bathurst Westbound AM and PM arrow traffic signal phase, to ensure the movements do not conflict with LRT flow; Bathurst Eastbound PM AM and PM vi) Pedestrian crossing timings have been provided in conformance with City of Toronto standards; vii) Vehicular traffic signal phases have been optimized to achieve the most efficient balance of the remaining Virgilwood Westbound AM AM green time during peak hour traffic signal cycles. Dufferin Westbound AM and PM AM and PM Dufferin Eastbound AM and PM The adoption of these assumptions is considered a “worst case scenario” because some portions of the existing single occupancy vehicle drivers are expected to shift to a different mode of transport, primarily the LRT itself, and Alness/Champagne Eastbound PM AM and PM others will find alternate routes for all or a portion of their previous use of Finch Avenue West. This shift in mode or Alness/Champagne Westbound AM and PM route also addresses any potential traffic growth which may otherwise have occurred along this corridor in the future. Chesswood Eastbound and AM and PM Westbound March 2010 Appendix C - 2 Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report Cross street Approach Existing Peak Hour With LRT Peak Hours 3. MITIGATION MEASURES CONSIDERED Keele Eastbound AM AM and PM Mitigation measures have been considered for these locations, and determined to be unfeasible at the locations noted Keele Westbound AM and PM above, with the exception of Highway 27. Jane Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM a) Prohibition of left-turn/U-turn movements at major intersections Norfinch/Oakdale Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM This treatment was studied at four intersections along the Finch Avenue corridor, namely at Bathurst Street, Dufferin Street, Jane Street, and at Weston Road. In all cases, the potential alternate routes were anticipated Norfinch/Oakdale Westbound AM and PM AM and PM and assessed. In the cases of Bathurst Street and Jane Street, it is predictable that significant volumes of Highway 400 northbound off Eastbound and AM and PM traffic would infiltrate onto local residential streets in the immediate area. At Dufferin Street and at Weston ramp Westbound Road, which border industrialized areas and thus are both serving a mixture of traffic including numerous large trucks, the number of alternate routes are limited. Any potential detour would take this traffic to Highway 400 southbound off Eastbound and AM and PM intersections which are already predicted to be at capacity. ramp Westbound b) Provision of new “Downstream” U-turn traffic signals combined with the prohibition of left/U-turn prohibitions Signet/Arrow Westbound AM and PM AM and PM The concept is to create new signalized U-turn opportunities for traffic wishing to turn left beyond the major Signet/Arrow Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM intersection where the left turns are prohibited. In all cases, the creation of such new signals was deemed unfeasible because of the need to accommodate the movement of large tractor trailers which have very broad Weston Westbound PM AM and PM turning radii, and because of the large number of driveways, other turning movements, and congested traffic Weston Eastbound AM and PM AM and PM conditions in close proximity downstream from the subject intersections. Islington Westbound AM and PM c) Introduction of double left/U-turn lanes for heavy movements on Finch Avenue The impact of building relatively short double left-turn/U-turn lanes compared to long single left-turn/U-turn Islington Eastbound PM lanes was assessed at four major intersections for the following critical approaches: eastbound at Bathurst Kipling Westbound PM Street; westbound at Dufferin Street; eastbound at Alness Street; and westbound at Chesswood Drive. In each case, the resultant double turn lane design requires more property takings than the single lane design, Kipling Eastbound PM and additional road construction costs are also anticipated. The double turn lane design also results in longer Albion Rd. Westbound PM PM crossing distances for pedestrians, and thus a less pedestrian-friendly environment in locations where pedestrian crossing activity is encouraged, and where pedestrian access to LRT platforms is required. Double Albion Rd. Eastbound PM AM and PM left turns were considered as a means of keeping the cycle length relatively low due to a relatively shorter left Martin Grove Westbound AM and PM turn phase requirement, and the lower cycle length can be better for both pedestrians and transit.
Recommended publications
  • Bathurst Street Toronto, On
    INVESTMENT & FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BATHURST STREET TORONTO, ON BATHURST ST SUBJECT PROPERTY FINCH AVE W THE OFFERING Finch West Station 5.2% Population growth in The Land Services Group is pleased to offer for sale a ±0.61- next half decade acre property located on the southwest corner of Bathurst Street (within 5km radius) and Finch Avenue West. 4926 Bathurst Street (the “Site” or “Property”) is improved with a Shell Gas Station. The Property is currently leased with Shell Canada through April 30, 2020 with one five-year renewal option to April 30, 2025. This area is one of the premier nodes for education and community services in the City of Toronto. Located in proximity to the York University Keele Campus, Seneca @ York and the University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace, the area has experienced immense investment and transformation owing WESTWest DonDON Park PARK Lands LAN to the various post-secondary institutions and surrounding Herbert H. Carnegie WEST DON PARK LAN complimentary uses. The Site is well serviced by a number of Centennial Centre transportation options. The Property is located a short 5-minute drive from Finch TTC Station and a 6-minute drive from the new Finch West TTC Station. Highways 400, 401 and 407 are all located under a fifteen minute drive. With the Downtown core becoming increasingly built out, developers are looking further afield for new high density FINCH AVE W development opportunities. Situated in a transitioning area slated for residential intensification and growth, the Site’s high Northview Heights WEST DON PARK LAN profile corner location at this busy intersection makes it a prime Secondary School candidate for future residential redevelopment.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Act Section 7.1 Notice of Completion of Ministry Review an Invitation to Comment on the Environmental A
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT SECTION 7.1 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF MINISTRY REVIEW AN INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION An environmental assessment (EA) was submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and the City of Toronto for the extension of the Spadina Subway from Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue (via York University). The Spadina Subway Extension includes the construction, operation and maintenance of TTC’s subway from Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue, with stations located at: 1. Sheppard Avenue West/Downsview Park, west of the CN Newmarket Subdivision (Sheppard West Station); 2. The intersection of Keele Street/Finch Avenue West (Finch West Station); 3. The York University Common (York University Station); and, 4. The proposed inter-regional transit terminal at Steeles Avenue West between Keele Street and Jane Street (Steeles West Station). In addition, the following surface commuter facilities will be provided: 1. Finch West Station – an 8-10 bay bus terminal as well as a passenger pick-up and drop-off and a 400-space commuter parking lot in the Richview/Cherrywood (Finch) hydro corridor; and, 2. Steeles West Station – a 35-40 bay bus terminal with a passenger pick-up and drop-off and a 2,400 to 3,000 space commuter parking lot in the Claireville/Cherrywood (Steeles) hydro corridor. You can submit comments on the undertaking, the environmental assessment, and the ministry Review. You may also request that the Minister refer the application to a hearing by the Environmental Review Tribunal. If you request a hearing you must state in your submission, whether you are requesting a hearing on the whole application or on only specified matters related to the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT
    Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX M – Consultation Record March 2010 March 2010 Appendix M Delcan Corporation Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit Transit Project Assessment Environmental Project Report - Appendices 3.0 List of Interested Persons Participating in the Consultations 1.0 Introduction This appendix documents in detail the consultations carried out with the technical agencies, the public, Consultation was carried out to encourage technical agencies to provide input during the course of the and the First Nations communities. study. The following agencies were invited to be involved and provide comment on the TPAP study for the EFWLRT: 2.0 Description of Consultations and Follow-up Efforts The general public, government agencies and various interest groups were provided opportunities to Government Review Agencies Technical Agencies Canadian Environmental Assessment All Stream review and comment on this project during the course of the study. The City of Toronto Public Agency Consultation Team was involved in the overall public consultation process. They offered a wide range Environmental Canada MTA All Stream Inc. of communication methods to the public, including project web site, dedicated telephone number, fax, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Telus and email address for contacting the project team. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Enwave Energy Corporation (INAC) Transportation Canada-Ontario Region Group Telecom/360 Network Technical agencies, including federal, provincial, municipal agencies, utilities, and potential interested Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Hydro One Network Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment
    Yonge Subway Extension Transit Project Assessment Councillors Briefing January 22, 2009 inter-regional connectivity is the key to success 2 metrolinx: 15 top priorities ● On November 28, 2008 Regional Transportation Plan approved by Metrolinx Board ● Top 15 priorities for early implementation include: ¾ Viva Highway 7 and Yonge Street through York Region ¾ Spadina Subway extension to Vaughan Corporate Centre ¾ Yonge Subway extension to Richmond Hill Centre ¾ Sheppard/Finch LRT ¾ Scarborough RT replacement ¾ Eglinton Crosstown LRT 3 …transit city LRT plan 4 yonge subway – next steps TODAY 5 what’s important when planning this subway extension? You told us your top three priorities were: 1. Connections to other transit 2. Careful planning of existing neighbourhoods and future growth 3. Destinations, places to go and sensitivity to the local environment were tied for the third priority In addition, we need to address all the technical and operational requirements and costs 6 yonge subway at a crossroads ● The Yonge Subway is TTC’s most important asset ● Must preserve and protect existing Yonge line ridership ● Capacity of Yonge line to accommodate ridership growth a growing issue ● Extension of Yonge/Spadina lines matched by downstream capacity ● Three major issues: 1. Capacity of Yonge Subway line 2. Capacity of Yonge-Bloor Station 3. Sequence of events for expansion 7 yonge-university-spadina subway – peak hour volumes 8 yonge subway capacity: history ● Capacity of Yonge line an issue since early 1980s ● RTES study conclusions (2001) ¾
    [Show full text]
  • Finch Avenue Sheppard Avenue Lawrence Ave. West Weston Rd . Sc Arlett Rd . Eglinton Ave. West Finch Avenue Sheppard Avenue
    FUTURE VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE SUBWAY STATION SHOPPING FUTURE HWY 407 SUBWAY STATION SHOPPING STEELES AVENUE FUTURE STEELES WEST UNIVERSITY SUBWAY STATION OF TORONTO INSTITUTE FOR DANBY AEROSPACE WOODS STUDIES ELM KEELE CAMPUS PARK JOHN SHOREHAM PARK BOOTH FUTURE BOYNTON MEMORIAL STONG YORK UNIVERSITY WOODS ARENA POND SUBWAY STATION SAYWELL WOODS G. ROSS LORD DUFFERIN STREET PARK DRIFTWOOD MALOCA 400 HULMAR COMMUNITY GARDEN PARK RECREATION CENTRE BLACK CREEK JANE STREET EDGLEY PARKLAND PARK FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR RECREATIONAL TRAIL DRIFTWOOD FUTURE PARK FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR FINCH WEST FIRE RECREATIONAL TRAIL SUBWAY STATION FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR STATION GARTHDALE PARK RECREATIONAL TRAIL FOUNTAINHEAD PARK FINCH AVENUE JANE FINCH MALL DERRYDOWN PARK BRATTY TOPCLIFF PARK PARK SENTINEL PARK FIRGROVE PARK ELIA MIDDLE SCHOOL CHURCH CHURCH GRANDRAVINE PARK OAKDALE FUTURE PARK GRANDRAVINE SHEPPARD WEST FENNIMORE ARENA SUBWAY STATION PARK FIRE STATION SPENVALLEY CHURCH PARK STANLEY PARK ST. JANE BLESSED BROOKWELL KEELE STREET FRANCES DOWNSVIEW MARGHERITA NORHTWOOD PARK PARK CATHOLIC OF CITTA CASTELLO SCHOOL PARK SHOPPING SPORT CENTRE SILVIO CATHOLIC SCHOOL WILSON HEIGHTS BLVD COLELLA SHOPPING DOWNSVIEW BANTING PARK LIBRARY SHEPPARD AVENUE SUBWAY PARK ST. MARTHA STATION CHURCH DIANA CATHOLIC PARK SCHOOL ALLEN ROAD GILTSPUR PARK DOWNSVIEW BELMAR DELLS PARKETTE PARK LANGHOLM KEELE STREET WILSON OAKDALE GOLF & PARK COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS BEVERLEY HEIGHTS PARK 400 MIDDLE SCHOOL BLAYDON PUBLIC SCHOOL EXBURY PARK CHURCH ST. CONRAD JANE STREET CATHOLIC ST. GERARD HEATHROW SCHOOL DOWNSVIEW MAJELLA PARK SECONDARY ANCASTOR ANCASTER FIRE CATHOLIC TUMPANE RODING SCHOOL MT. SINAI PUBLIC PARK STATION WILSON SCHOOL PUBLIC COMMUNITY MEMORIAL SCHOOL SUBWAY SCHOOL CENTRE LIBRARY PARK ANCASTER ST. NORBERT STATION MODONNA COMMUNITY CATHOLIC CHALKFARM RODING SCHOOL PARK ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Centre 5650/5700 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON
    ABOVE AND BEYOND North American Centre 5650/5700 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON Prominently located at the corner of Yonge Street and Finch Avenue, North American Centre is a Class A office complex. Comprised of two towers totaling over 1.2 million SF with direct underground access to the TTC and GO Transit. North American Centre ABOVE 5650/5700 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON AND BEYOND Property Highlights Building Overview On-site Amenities Direct TTC and GO Transit access GoodLife Fitness Large retail concourse connecting 5650 and 5700 Yonge Kids & Company daycare Street with a variety of on-site amenities Foodcourt and eateries (Piazza Manna, Freshii, Timothy’s, 1630 parking spots (1.75 per 1000 SF) in a 5-level underground Booster Juice, Thai Express, Pumpernickels, Starbucks, Broiche) parking garage with designated electric vehicle charging stations. Pharma Plus, optometry, dental, massage/physiotherapy and Bicycle storage (P1 level) chiropractic services 24/7 staffed security TD Bank / Royal Bank Print and copy centre Dry cleaning, hair salon and car wash facilities End of trip showers Certified LEED Gold Questions? Please Contact: Tanner Witton, Leasing Manager T: 416-323-2554 E: [email protected] Matthew Lareau, Leasing Director T: 416-323-2561 E: [email protected] North American Centre ABOVE 5650/5700 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON AND BEYOND A Superior Location Strategically located at the corner of Yonge Street and Finch Avenue, North American Centre offers unmatched access to major transportation routes and public transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit (LRT) Notice of Commencement of the Transit Project Assessment Process and Open Houses
    Etobicoke-Finch West Light Rail Transit (LRT) Notice of Commencement of the Transit Project Assessment Process and Open Houses The City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) are holding four Open Houses where you can learn more about this transit project, ask questions and share your comments. Each Open House will be held between 7:00pm to 9:30pm. Details are as follows: Tuesday, Dec 1 RJ Lang Elementary and MS (cafeteria) – 227 Drewry Avenue Thursday, Dec 3 Julius Banquet Centre - 2201 Finch Avenue West (at Arrow Rd) Monday, Dec 7 Charles H Best MS (gym) - 285 Wilmington Avenue Wednesday, Dec 9 Elmbank JMA - 10 Pittsboro Drive (east of Martingrove) Background The City of Toronto and the TTC are planning a new Light Rail Transit (LRT) route to signicantly improve transit service on Finch Avenue West between Yonge Street and the Highway 27/Humber College area. Electrically-powered Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs) will travel in reserved lanes providing a smooth, fast and comfortable transit experience. The Etobicoke-Finch West LRT will connect to the Yonge subway line at Finch Station and the future extension of the Spadina Subway line at the planned Keele Station. The City of Toronto Ofcial Plan outlines initiatives to implement transit priorities throughout the city, intensify growth in rapid transit corridors and reduce car dependency. Transit City will achieve these goals by moving more people to more places by transit. Once implemented, the Transit City LRT lines will support local economic development and reduce greenhouse emissions by allowing people to choose public transit as a convenient alternative to the private automobile.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Transportation in Toronto
    Transportation in Toronto: Achievements and Prospects Steve Munro University College November 18, 2014 I’ve been described variously as a “transit activist”, a term that softened with age into “transit advocate”, occasionally a “transit guru” (although I don’t have a little cloud in tow as a seat from which to pontificate), and even worse as an “expert”. That latter term always raises suspicion in an “activist” because the inevitable question is “according to whom”? Experts often have an agenda – it may be personal, or it may derive from the professional and political environment in which they work. And so, I would rather be an “advocate” than an “expert” any day. Today, I do have an agenda, and that’s to talk about what has passed for regional transportation, and especially transit planning during my active life as a transit watcher. I will take the role of curmudgeon talking about what might have been as a warning for the limitations on what we might do today. I was born in downtown Toronto, about 1km from University College, and have always lived in “the old city”. The first big political battle I knew was the fight against the Spadina Expressway, a scheme that would have brought a depressed, divided arterial into the heart of the city, only a few blocks away at Harbord and Spadina. We are already living in a city very different from what might have been had the expressway network been completed. Much of what we now call Toronto, let along the “905” beyond, is quite new and it was all built in the era of car-oriented planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
    Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Mts-04
    IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, C. 15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition for certain orders under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL STARKEY ON BEHALF OF TORONTO HYDRO-ELECTRIC SYSTEM LIMITED (“THESL” or “Toronto Hydro”) ATTACHMENT MTS-04 ATTACHMENT MTS-04 Attachment MTS-04 Listing of Cellular/PCS/AWS Station Sites Within 25 Kms. of the Center of Toronto MTS-04 is intended to identify the physical locations (i.e., station sites) of all antennas licensed for radio-transmission within the cellular/PCS/AWS frequency bands that are within 25 kilometers of the center of Toronto. Attachment MTS-04 was developed as follows. Step 1: The Attachment MTS-03 dataset served as staring point. Because that dataset includes antenna arrays that may be operated by different carriers at the same station site, it was necessary to eliminate multiple records for the same station site. The first step in that process involved concatenating the latitude and longitude fields into a single number and sorting on this new field. A simple @IF formula (i.e., if lat-long field of current record = lat-long field of previous record, flag as a duplicate) was then applied to compare successive records’ concatenated latitude-longitude fields and remove all duplicates (which represent multiple antenna arrays collocated at the same station site), so that only a single unique record remained for each location (latitude/longitude). Step 2: However, we also encountered numerous instances in which the various wireless operators had entered non-identical latitude-longitude and/or street address information on the records they supplied to the ALS database for what were clearly intended to represent the same station locations.
    [Show full text]
  • EGLINTON CROSSTOWN RAPID TRANSIT BENEFITS CASE UPDATE June 2012
    EGLINTON CROSSTOWN RAPID TRANSIT BENEFITS CASE UPDATE June 2012 Eglinton Crosstown Rapid Transit Updated Benefits-Case Analysis Multiple Account Evaluation Technical Note June 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metrolinx Steer Davies Gleave Suite 600 1500-330 Bay St 20 Bay Street Toronto, ON Toronto, ON M5H 2S8 M5J 2W3 +1 (647) 260 4861 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Updated Multiple Account Evaluation CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1 2 DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS ...........................................................................2 Project Options ........................................................................................ 2 Base Case Definition ................................................................................... 2 Option 1: Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown LRT ................................................... 2 Option 2: Future Proofing Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown LRT ................................ 4 Option 3: Transit City Concept ...................................................................... 4 Option 4: Eglinton-Scarborough Subway ............................................................ 5 Summary Statistics .................................................................................. 11 3 TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT ...................................................................... 12 Introduction .......................................................................................... 12 Ridership .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]