Public Meeting Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Meeting Agenda Public Meeting Minutes Joint Review Committee STUDY SESSION September 2, 2015 HARRY E. MITCHELL GOVERNMENT CENTER TEMPE CITY HALL – CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 31 EAST 5TH STREET 5:30 p.m. The Joint Review Committee reserves this time to discuss informally any item(s) appearing on the Public Hearing/Meeting Agenda (including questions/answers), Rules and Procedures of the Committee, and other matters pertinent to the Committee to perform its purpose. Only procedural decisions will be made in the Study Session. Members Present Staff Present Pam Goronkin, Chair – Joint Representative Ryan Levesque, Deputy Comm. Dev. Director Rudy Bellavia, ASU Representative Alex Smith, Real Estate Development Supervisor Dominique Laroche, ASU Representative (Alternate) Neil Calfee, ASU University Real Estate Dev. Lisa Roach, Tempe Representative Julie Stennerson, Executive Assistant Dr. Kim Charrier, Tempe Representative Ross Robb, Tempe Representative Guests Jason Comer, Tempe Representative (Alternate) John Creer, ASU, Assistant Vice President for Real Estate Development Members Absent Brian Kearney, Catellus Development Corp., Senior Ed Soltero, ASU Representative Development Manager Anne Gazzaniga, ASU Representative (Alternate) Brittney Kaufmann, Tempe Representative (Alternate) Chair Goronkin called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Arizona State University Athletic Facilities District John Creer and Brian Kearney gave a presentation regarding the land use plan for the future development of the ASU Athletic Facilities District. The Facilities District is a 20+ year development. The parcel of land includes 330 acres. The Stadium, Wells Fargo, and the parking structure will not be moved during the land development. The golf program will be relocated up north at Papago Park. The baseball program will be relocated to Phoenix Municipal Stadium. All of the other facilities will be relocated throughout the district. The facilities will be improved and will add community benefit. The venues will be opened and available to the community. The physical attributes of the land have been studied and a robust study has been completed of the market, to develop a land use plan. The land use plan will change over time to respond to the market. The following highlights are from the PowerPoint presentation. What is the District and why was it created? University Athletics Facility District (State Law – 2010) JOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE STUDY SESSION MINUTES September 2, 2015 2 Finance renovation and construction of new athletic facilities without use of taxpayer money Create world-class urban community Produce financial returns for the university and significant, tangible economic and urban development benefits for city Building on the long history of support from the Sun Devil community Critical for ASU to upgrade facilities to remain competitive in PAC-12 Improved revenue generation but still have further to go Sun Devil Stadium 2nd oldest in PAC-12 and only one not renovated District creates opportunity to leverage prior support Minimum $750 million endowment required to match return to be generated from district What has been accomplished? Selected Catellus Development Corporation as master developer Conducted site assessment and due diligence analyses Completed market study and analyses Developed Preliminary Master Plan Conducted stakeholder/public outreach Initiated first phase activities Catellus Master Development Experience – 30 Years Nationwide – 27 Cities Projects – 12,000 Acres Military and Government Redevelopments – 10 Sites Guiding principles for district planning and development Urban character Sustainability Walkability Live/Work/Play Discipline Quality Best-in-class developers Preliminary Master Plan - Land Use Allocation District runs from the west side of Sun Devil Stadium to McClintock Drive, as far north as the Tempe Town Lake and as far south as University Drive The 330 acres includes all of the athletic venues with about 140-150 acres of private development opportunity within the area Develop land use plan, market the plan to the commercial market, long term ground lease individual parcels to developers, majority of the projects will be built by others, serve as ASU’s agent in negotiating long term ground leases Land Uses Low (4 stories or less) to Mid-Rise Office (5 – 9 stories) Mid (5 – 9 stories) to High-Rise Office (10 stories or more) Hotel Urban Density Multi-Family Commercial Mixed Use JOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE STUDY SESSION MINUTES September 2, 2015 3 Mixed Use Retail Athletics Facilities The core of the district is east of Sun Devil Stadium to the eastern side of the lots on Rural Road Rural Road – north/south core of the district, anticipate having the greatest intensity and mix of uses Rio Salado/Rural and University/Rural – intensive commercial corners Urban density, multi-family along Rural Road with ground level retail, restaurant and entertainment space Low to Mid-Rise office development south of Rio Salado Parkway Mixed-Use community north of Rio Salado Parkway, west of McClintock Drive Athletic Venues east of Rural – track, tennis, practice fields An events venue, small arena may be located east of the Wells Fargo Arena for smaller indoor sports New local streets will be added throughout the district for internal circulation to remove some of the pressure off of the arterial streets as well as intersection improvements Working with the City on a downtown traffic analysis First Phase North West corner of Rural Road and University Drive Attractive to the market as an office prospective, multi-family, and retailers Issue a Request-for-Proposals this fall to the multi-family development community First office project, secure office tenants and a retail component Parking - multi-family will have its own parking, office buildings/retail will have shared parking The meeting was opened for questions from the Committee. Ross Robb asked for clarification on the process the Joint Review Committee would be going through regarding this project as it relates to the master developer and the component projects. Chair Goronkin stated the intergovernmental agreement creating the MU-Ed (Mixed-Use Educational) Zoning District was designed in 2004 to create an opportunity for the City to participate in design decisions of the University whenever a commercial use abutted the public rights-of-way. The agreement to have representatives from the citizens of Tempe as well as members of the University community and a joint appointee to be approved by both the University President and the Mayor was designed to create a consensus around the approval of design. The Joint Review Committee is the decision making body. Ryan Levesque explained that around 2006-2007 as a result of the intergovernmental agreement certain properties were rezoned MU-Ed (Mixed-Use Educational). When a project comes forward for non-public university purposes, on ASU land, the project would come forward to the Joint Review Committee. There are certain areas outside of the boundary of the designated zoning district within the Stadium District plan and process. The City of Tempe as well as ASU still needs to meet and confer on the appropriate process for these projects. Chair Goronkin stated the Marina Heights, State Farm Development fell into an area that did not come to this committee due to ownership and various other reasons. The City of Tempe has great stake and interest in this area. The citizens of Tempe have invested heavily in the Tempe Town Lake. The lake has greatly enhanced property values and has created the opportunity to enhance development. Ross Robb asked about the infrastructure costs regarding the overhead power lines, the Val Vista water line, the Community Facility District for the property that fronts on the lake, street improvements, and traffic improvements. John Creer stated they were working with APS for the most economical way to make some of the overhead power lines more attractive, there are places where the lines will need to go underground. ASU will be meeting with the City of Tempe to complete a traffic study. The traffic and parking will increase due to the urbanization but it is important to JOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE STUDY SESSION MINUTES September 2, 2015 4 minimize the traffic delays. There are two pinch points to infrastructure; one is getting waste water across the lake, which caps the amount of vertical development that can be done. The other is getting the traffic across the bridge. Dedicated bike and pedestrian paths will be created throughout the district as well as small pocket parks to provide places to rest. ASU will be working with the City to plan the open space throughout the area. Brian Kearney stated the cost responsibility for the new streets, intersection improvements, as well as water and sewer lines will be repaid through project revenues as the individual projects are developed. Chair Goronkin stated the Community Facilities District is reimbursed by tenants that front the lake side. The District includes two properties near the lake. John Creer stated they were viewing the relocation of athletic venues as infrastructure costs. Dominique Laroche asked if the schools in Tempe would be able accommodate the additional students from the new multi-family projects. Brian Kearney indicated there would probably be very few school aged kids generated by this particular environment at this location. The projects are not typically built with play grounds or the types of things that are family supportive. Typically families with children do not live in urban type environment areas. Dominique Laroche asked how solar and sustainability would be incorporated into this program. Brian Kearney stated discussion has taken place regarding the relocation of the existing solar arrays that sit on top of the surface parking between Packard and the football stadium. The solar arrays will be maintained; however the location has not been determined yet. There will be other opportunities for solar power within the district, possibly on top of parking structures. Other sustainability efforts are to be determined. Catellus plans to work closely with ASU and the Institute of Global Sustainability.
Recommended publications
  • 2012 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL Arizona State Sun Devil Baseball 2012 Season Schedule
    2012 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL Arizona State Sun Devil Baseball 2012 Season Schedule DAY DATE OPPONENT SITE TIME Friday Feb. 17 Western Michigan Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 6:30 p.m. Saturday Feb. 18 Western Michigan Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 1:00 p.m. Sunday Feb. 19 Western Michigan Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 12:30 p.m. Friday Feb. 24 UC Riverside Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 6:30 p.m. Saturday Feb. 25 UC Riverside Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 1:00 p.m. Sunday Feb. 26 UC Riverside Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 12:30 p.m. Thursday March 1 St. Louis Surprise, Ariz. • Surprise Stadium 4:00 p.m. Friday March 2 Northern Illinois Surprise, Ariz. • Surprise Stadium 4:00 p.m. Saturday March 3 Winthrop Surprise, Ariz. • Surprise Stadium 4:00 p.m. Sunday March 4 St. Mary’s Surprise, Ariz. • Surprise Stadium 4:00 p.m.^ Tuesday March 6 Texas Tech Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 6:30 p.m. Friday March 9 Long Beach State Long Beach, Calif. • Blair Field 6:30 p.m. Saturday March 10 Long Beach State Long Beach, Calif. • Blair Field 5:30 p.m. Sunday March 11 Long Beach State Long Beach, Calif. • Blair Field 1:00 p.m. Tuesday March 13 Utah Valley Tempe, Ariz. • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark 6:30 p.m. Wednesday March 14 Utah Valley Tempe, Ariz.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State NCAA Super Regional Media Guide
    Arizona State NCAA Super Regional Media Guide Arizona State University Quick Facts 2003 NCAA Super Regional Location ........................................................................... Tempe, Ariz. Enrollment ................................................................................. 45,693 Arizona State vs. Cal State Fullerton Founded ........................................................................................ 1885 Nickname ............................................................................ Sun Devils June 6-8, 2003 Colors ....................................................................... Maroon and Gold Conference ............................................................................ Pacific-10 Goodwin Field Home Field (Capacity) ................................. Packard Stadium (4,300) Regional Site (Capacity) .................... Tempe Diablo Stadium (9,668) Diablo Dimensions .................................... LF: 340 CF: 420 RF: 360 President ........................................................................ Michael Crow Director of Athletics .......................................................... Gene Smith Baseball Staff Head Coach ....................................................................... Pat Murphy Years at ASU/Record ...................................................Nine/359-176-1 Div. I Career Record ............................................................ 677-292-2 ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sun Devil Baseball 2018 Roster
    2018 Sun Devil Baseball 2018 Roster 2018 Sun Devil Baseball Five -Time NCAA Champions (1965, 1967, 1969, 1977, 1981) | 22 College World Series Appearances | 21 Conference Championships TWITTER: @ASU_BASEBALL 123 All-Americans | 14 National Players of the Year | 10 College Baseball Hall of Fame Members INSTAGRAM: @ASU_BASEBALL 1 414 Major League Baseball Draft Picks | 108 Major Leaguers | 49 Major League Baseball First-Round Draft Picks FACEBOOK: SUNDEVILBASEBALL 2018 ROSTER PITCHERS (16) No. Name YR B/T HT WT Hometown (High School/Last School) 30 Brady Corrigan Fr. R/R 6’2” 200 Plainfield, Ill. (Plainfield North) 36 Colby Davis Fr. R/R 6’8” 225 Scottsdale, Ariz. (Chaparral) 31 Drake Davis Fr. R/R 6’0” 185 Highlands Ranch, Colo. (Ralston Valley) 23 Jake Godfrey Sr. R/R 6’3” 225 New Lenox, Ill. (Providence Catholic/LSU/NW Florida St.) 11 Connor Higgins Jr. R/L 6’5” 240 Orefield, Pa. (Parkland) 17 Ryan Hingst Sr. R/R 6’4” 191 El Paso, Texas (Franklin) 15 Eli Lingos Sr. L/L 6’0” 192 Temecula, Calif. (Great Oak) 8 Alec Marsh So. R/R 6’2” 220 Milwaukee, Wis. (Ronald Reagan) 3 Chaz Montoya So. L/L 6’0” 160 Glendale, Ariz. (Centennial) 41 Dellan Raish R-Fr. L/L 6’2” 180 Cave Creek, Ariz. (Cactus Shadows) 26 Sam Romero Jr. R/R 6’2” 180 Phoenix, Ariz. (Carl Hayden/Phoenix College) 29 Grant Schneider Sr. R/R 6’3” 205 Austin, Texas (Lake Travis) 22 Fitz Stadler Jr. R/R 6’9” 240 Glenbrook, Ill. (Glenbrook South) 25 Zane Strand R-Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtport Ttrizonfr of Thu 5Tnte, ?Resident Llntuersity
    Rtport tTrizonfr of thu 5tnte, ?resident Llntuersity 1981 1982 Report tTrizonfr of thu Statu ?resident l-tntaersity 1981 1982 J. RUSSELL NELSON Photos by Conley Photography: Pages 11,15,19,23, and27. BUREAU OF PUBLICATIONS. ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY O DECEMBER 1982 j{ew Chnllenges for ai{ew Era Because Arizona State University has dealt primarily Because resources are more limited, and many other with explosive growth and expansion, the modest enroll- governmental programs, particularly human services, ment increases anticipated in the 1980s pose some rather are becoming stronger contenders for the available state special challenges. To understand the implications of this funds, our challenge will be greater. change, it is helpful to recall the circumstances leading It is a time for reassessment. Chancellor R. Bromery up to it. of the University of Massachusetts observed the begin- The expansion began with the flood of veterans ning of that process several years ago when he wrote, enrolling in American colleges and universities following "The ever-expanding market for higher education has World War IL Returning veterans triggered a quarter begun to sense its own outer edges, and the educational century of growth and expansion unequalled in the his- 'Bulls' in and out of our institutions of higher learning tory of higher education. Impressive as those national have begun to make place for the'Bearsl The philosophy figures were - from 2 million to 9 million students - of almost limitless growth that characterized the 1950s they did not begin to match the growth which occurred and 1960s has been replaced by the concepts of limited at Arizona State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Subdivision Disclosure Report (Public Report)
    Arizona Department of Real Estate (ADRE) DOUGLAS A. DUCEY Development Services Division GOVERNOR www.azre.gov JUDY LOWE 100 N. 15th Ave. Suite 201 COMMISSIONER PHOENIX, AZ 85007 SUBDIVISION DISCLOSURE REPORT (PUBLIC REPORT) FOR Tempe Micro Estates Registration No. DM20-059972 SUBDIVIDER Newtown Community Development Corporation 2106 E. Apache Boulevard, Suite 112 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Effective Date: July 19, 2021 PROPERTY REPORT DISCLAIMER This report is NOT A RECOMMENDATION NOR AN ENDORSEMENT by the State of Arizona of this land. The application and public report have not been subjected to a detailed examination by the Department. The report was prepared by the subdivider and none of the information in this report has been verified by the Department; all information has been accepted by the Department as true and accurate based on attestation of the subdivider/or the subdivider’s agents. The purchaser should verify all facts before signing any documents. The Department assumes no responsibility for the quality or quantity of any improvement in this development. FORM Z3 – Expedited Template rev 3/18/2015 1 Contents GENERAL ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 SUBDIVISION LOCATION ......................................................................................................................... 4 UTILITIES ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan 2018-2020 FISCAL YEARS 2018-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
    Capital Improvement Plan 2018-2020 FISCAL YEARS 2018-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS SEPTEMBER 2016 Dear Members of the Arizona Board of Regents: On behalf of Arizona State University, I am pleased to present the ASU FY 2018-2020 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). ASU continues to make meaningful progress in its evolution as a model for 21st century higher education, dedicated to access, excellence and impact. In keeping with the ambitious trajectory reflected in the ASU Strategic Enterprise Framework and the ASU Campus Master Plan, the projects proposed in this CIP focus on addressing the need for sustainable facilities that support the achievement of our institutional objectives. For this CIP, ASU has set as an FY 2018 priority a new, energy-efficient parking structure that will be located adjacent to the core of the Tempe campus and downtown Tempe. The multi-tiered structure will replace existing surface parking that will be displaced by planned new development on this site. This project is intended to provide students, faculty and staff with a high-quality facility that will enable their success and support the key elements of ASU’S Strategic Enterprise Framework, including: - Achieving a 57 percent increase in degree production - Establishing national standing in academic quality and the impact of colleges and schools in every field - Enhancing local impact and social embeddedness - Expanding research performance to $815 million in annual research expenditures by 2025 Details regarding this proposed project can be found in the Three-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the FY 2018 Project Description tab.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Venue & Ecommerce Provider
    In-Venue & eCommerce Provider Arizona State University (ASU) has an ongoing requirement for an In-Venue store and eCommerce provider for sales of ASU officially licensed apparel, gifts,/souvenirs at ASU athletic venues and events Open 4/29/2021 3:00 PM MST Type Request for Proposal Close 5/17/2021 3:00 PM MST Number RFP-342102 Currency US Dollar Sealed Until 5/17/2021 3:00 PM MST Contacts Jacquelyne Ahern Shannon Beyer [email protected] [email protected] Brennon Carlson [email protected] Commodity Codes Commodity Code Description 53-02 Apparel and Luggage and Personal Care Products 48-01 Retail Equipment and Supplies 29 April 2021 Description INTENT Arizona State University (ASU) has an ongoing requirement for an In-Venue store and eCommerce provider for sales of ASU officially licensed apparel, gifts, and souvenirs at ASU athletic venues and events. The awarded supplier is expected to provide innovative retail strategies for In-Venue stores, as well as services for eCommerce. These strategies should include highly efficient order fulfillment and customer relationship management to provide an instore and internet retail website shopping experience through which supplier sells officially licensed ASU merchandise. The goal of this RFP is to conduct a competitive bidding process to award one supplier to provide In-Venue store and eCommerce services. ASU is interested in the continued growth of a strong brand and maximizing revenue with a provider who can provide all services while protecting the trademarks of ASU. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Arizona State University currently uses one provider for In-venue stores and eCommerce sales of ASU officially licensed apparel, gifts, and souvenirs at ASU athletic venues and events.
    [Show full text]
  • April 19, 2017 REQUEST for PROPOSAL UNARMED
    April 19, 2017 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL UNARMED SECURITY GUARD SERVICES RFP 341707 DUE: 3:00 P.M., MST, 05/12/17 Time and Date of Pre-Proposal Conference 8:30 A.M., MST, 04/24/17 Deadline for Inquiries 5:00 P.M., MST, 04/28/17 Time and Date Set for Closing 3:00 P.M., MST, 05/12/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE SECTION I – REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL .................................................................... 4 SECTION II – PURPOSE OF THE RFP .......................................................................... 5 SECTION III – PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE .......................................................... 9 SECTION IV – INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS ...................................................... 10 SECTION V – SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF WORK .................................................. 17 SECTION VII – PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................... 26 SECTION VIII – EVALUATION CRITERIA ................................................................... 28 SECTION IX – PRICING SCHEDULE ........................................................................... 29 SECTION X – FORM OF PROPOSAL/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ............................. 31 SECTION XI – PROPOSER INQUIRY FORM ............................................................... 32 SECTION XII – TERMS & CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 33 SECTION XIII – MANDATORY CERTIFICATIONS ...................................................... 44 APPENDIX A - ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2013 Capital Improvement Plan
    2011-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2011-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROVED BY THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS 24 SEPTEMBER 2009 Dear Members of the Arizona Board of Regents: On behalf of Arizona State University, I am pleased to present the Arizona State University FY 2011-2013 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). ASU continues to make meaningful progress in its evolution as a model for 21st century higher education dedicated to access, excellence and impact. In keeping with the ambitious trajectory reflected in the ASU vision and goals, ten-year strategic plan, and comprehensive development plan, the projects proposed in the 2011-2013 CIP focus strongly on addressing Arizona’s projected rapid and extensive growth and the resulting enhanced demand for higher education. For this cycle, ASU has set as its priority the significant repair and renovation of existing university infrastructure. Our proposed plan allocates funding for a series of ongoing revitalization projects intended to provide faculty, staff and students with high quality facilities. These critically important facilities constitute the core institutional framework that will enable ASU to prepare for the dramatic population increase forecasted for our state and to advance its mandate to facilitate access to higher education for all qualified students. To that end, our upcoming efforts will concentrate on improving the overall student experience by renovating infrastructure, renewing academic facilities, and enhancing facilities/space dedicated to student support and activities. We believe that the thoughtful and proactive renovation of the university’s existing infrastructure is vital to the success of our current and future students. The 2011-2013 CIP, as well as the active projects being advanced through our comprehensive development plan, accurately demonstrate the physical aspect of ASU’s realization of the New American University and its steadfast commitment to serve the people of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Official College Baseball Foundation Hall of Fame Ballot
    2006 Official College Baseball Foundation Hall of Fame Ballot Former Players 1. Dave Magadan, Alabama 2. Bob Horner, Arizona State 3. Mickey Sullivan, Baylor 4. Jackie Jensen, California 5. Tim Wallach, Cal State Fullerton 6. Derek Tatsuno. Hawai’i 7. Pete Incaviglia, Oklahoma State 8. Robin Ventura, Oklahoma State 9. Billy Swift, Maine 10. Neal Heaton, Miami (Fla.) 11. Barry Larkin, Michigan 12. Paul Molitor, Minnesota 13. Dave Winfield, Minnesota 14. Will Clark, Mississippi State 15. B.J. Surhoff, North Carolina 16. Steve Arlin, Ohio State 17. Brooks Kieschnick, Texas 18. Keith Moreland, Texas 19. Fred Lynn, USC 20. John Olerud, Washington State 21. Joe Carter, Wichita State 22. Phil Stephenson, Wichita State Former Coaches 1. Jerry Kindall, Arizona 2. Bobby Winkles, Arizona State 3. Dr. Jim Brock, Arizona State 4. Bill Wilhelm, Clemson 5. Skip Bertman, LSU 6. Ron Fraser, Miami 7. Dick Siebert, Minnesota 8. Gary Ward, Oklahoma State 9. Bibb Falk, Texas 10. Cliff Gustafson, Texas 11. Rod Dedeaux, USC 12. Charles “Bobo” Brayton, Washington State Pre-1947 Veteran Coaches or Players 1. Clint Evans, California - coach 2. John “Jack” Barry, Holy Cross - coach 3. Ray Fisher, Michigan - coach 4. Billy Disch, Texas - coach 5. Joe “Rip” Sewell, Alabama - player 6. Ted Lyons, Baylor - player 7. Christy Mathewson, Bucknell – player 8. Lou Gehrig, Columbia – player 9. Owen Carroll, Holy Cross – player 10. Frankie Frisch, Fordham – player 11. Bobby Layne, Texas – player 12. George Sisler, Michigan – player Criteria Hall of Fame Enshrinement Coaches become eligible after ending active collegiate career, not to include an active coach on a professional baseball team.
    [Show full text]
  • Winkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Ballpark
    THIS IS SUN DEVIL BASEBALL Where Tomorrow’s Legends Play Today WINKLES FIELD-PACKARD STADIUM AT BROCK BALLPARK inkles Field-Packard Stadium at Brock Year honors. In addition, a 2003 coaches WBallpark was the home of Arizona survey published in Baseball America State baseball from 1974 through 2014. ranked ASU’s baseball facilities among the MONSTER HOME RUNS Known for its wonderful aesthetic features, Top 15 in the nation. the outfield wall was lined with palm trees, Over the years Packard received The following players are the only 25 in the and just beyond the right-field fence was numerous upgrades, including a practice history of Winkles Field-Packard Stadium the award-winning Karsten Golf Course. infield (1997) and indoor hitting facility at Brock Ballpark to hit a home run over In left field, sparkling Tempe Town Lake (1998). The practice infield was donated the “Green Monster” in centerfield. and the Tempe construction boom was by the Arizona Diamondbacks and offered Dennis Haines, Arizona, 1974 visible, and in the distance, the Superstition a full size infield that was used for various Kevin Romine, Arizona State, 1981 Mountains offered a picturesque backdrop. defensive, bunting and baserunning drills. But for every bit of beauty that enveloped The 6,000 square foot hitting facility was Barry Bonds, Arizona State, 1983 the facility, there was an equal dose provided by a private donation and included Louie Medina, Arizona State, 1984 of tradition. five batting cages and a separate area Romy Cucjen, Arizona State, 1984 The facility was the home of two national for speed and movement exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Bobby Winkles Field in 2001
    THE TRADITION CONTINUES ASUBASEBALL 2005 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 2 There comes a time in a little boy’s life when baseball is introduced to him. Thus begins the long journey for those meant to play the game at a higher level, for those who love the game so much they strive to be a part of its history. Sun Devil Baseball! NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS: 1965, 1967, 1969, 1977, 1981 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 3 ASU AND THE GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD > For the past 26 years, USA Baseball has honored the top amateur baseball player in the country with the Golden Spikes Award. (See winners box.) The award is presented each year to the player who exhibits exceptional athletic ability and exemplary sportsmanship. Past winners of this prestigious award include current Major League Baseball stars J. D. Drew, Pat Burrell, Jason Varitek, Jason Jennings and Mark Prior. > Arizona State’s Bob Horner won the inaugural award in 1978 after hitting .412 with 20 doubles and 25 RBI. Oddibe McDowell (1984) and Mike Kelly (1991) also won the award. > Dustin Pedroia was named one of five finalists for the 2004 Golden Spikes Award. He became the seventh all-time final- ist from ASU, including Horner (1978), McDowell (1984), Kelly (1990), Kelly (1991), Paul Lo Duca (1993) and Jacob Cruz (1994). ODDIBE MCDOWELL > With three Golden Spikes winners, ASU ranks tied for first with Florida State and Cal State Fullerton as the schools with the most players to have earned college baseball’s top honor. BOB HORNER GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD WINNERS 2004 Jered Weaver Long Beach State 2003 Rickie Weeks Southern 2002 Khalil Greene Clemson 2001 Mark Prior Southern California 2000 Kip Bouknight South Carolina 1999 Jason Jennings Baylor 1998 Pat Burrell Miami 1997 J.D.
    [Show full text]