arXiv:1308.2683v1 [gr-qc] 6 Aug 2013 rxmt eid15 oery17s i Hermann Aero- Sir the called then was 1970s. what early by supported to was ap- Bondi 1950 the during period Relativity proximate General in research supported o oiiems atce o eaiems particle, mass negative a For have we particle. mass positive a for hrvrams term mass a Wherever literature.[3] the what in questions judge found these be concerning one to may Details interactions anything, do. particular will than mass the negative conjecture at more look observable is must no This be would there universe. and decay infinity would en- minus been mass negative to positive never if away then has that available, it are argued states since also ergy right is is it However, this sense observed. a In physical. contexts. behavior physical its various examining is in mass, it represents negative judge article it, to This to introduction find behaves. an to order it how how In know or to exist, energy. necessary exam- may and mass to matter negative us of whether pushes kinds acceleration, energy new of dark ine powerful rate the our and type increasing unknown of mass the physics. of law fundamental their no devised of violate been they evidence have and experiments empirical thought direct many no existence, Tiomno.[1],[2] is of of reversal there states mass energy Although the negative or times equation, the if Dirac Other to the mass? connection simple, not in are why arise minus, arguments they or plus the be can Sometimes charge times. many osdrNwo’ a fmotion of law Newton’s consider representing letters all paper, mass this of convention by Also, ti neetn ont ohteAm n i Force Air and Army the both note to interesting is It h ento fngtv asaotdhr sthis: is here adopted mass negative of definition The non- being as dismissed sometimes is mass Negative of 90% with universe, the of knowledge of state The arisen has mass negative of concept the years the Over ,M m, F = t.aepstv elnmes oi we if So numbers. real positive are etc. , ewrs eaiemass Negative Keywords: 14.80.-j numbers: PACS w given. as is results strings for mechanical implications quantum nake and pass, positive wormholes, chasing censorship, mass negative of system bizarre blt fngtv ast eert n ro,aeanalyze are armor, any penetrate to mass negative of ability − oepyia set fngtv asaeeaie.Severa examined. are mass negative of aspects physical Some ma INTRODUCTION . m per,i srpae by replaced is it appears, F = nvriyo ot aoiaa hplHill Chapel at Carolina North of University ma eerhTinl ak ot Carolina North Park, Triangle Research eko hsis this know we hplHl,NrhCrln and Carolina North Hill, Chapel ihr .Hammond T. Richard Dtd uut1,2013) 14, August (Dated: eateto Physics of Department ryRsac Office Research Army eaiemass Negative − m . eaiems n oiiems alup. fall both mass planet, positive same mass and the negative mass a By negative on down. force show falls the may apple you as mass reasoning direction negative opposite the so, the and in is acceleration the eueNwo’ a fmto,wih o negative a for is which, convention the motion, of light of in acceleration, object law mass the Newton’s compute to use Now, we earth. the from away eei httefrei ie by given is used force convention the The in that mass earth. is the negative here of of field object mass positive an the consider we suppose Now F as ti en sa nrdcint h ujc by subject the physics. to within introduction subfields an varying from as examples meant negative using on is treatise It exhaustive an mass. be to meant open.[7] means wormhole no a keep can mass and negative the wormholes, known new of is of study it One revolutionary the spacecrafts.[6] involved investigate of programs 2002. research propulsion to the through for given 1996 schemes were from Project Grants Physics Propulsion ar- famous mass.[5] his negative published Bondi concerning ticle period this “anti-gravity.”[4] during in was interest the It Force documented and a Air Lab), had Research the Force Army Air of the for part stands was ARL (today which Lab Research nautical pl.Nwo’ a fgaiainfrpstv mass positive mass for positive gravitation a of like law just Newton’s down, nega- apple. fall a say would and apple you equivalence mass example, of tive For principle the questions out. on of rely them kinds might the these figuring of answer before and field intuition try gravitational to by the fun is in It do earth. mass negative of ject > m ow e h oc norngtv asapei up, is apple mass negative our on force the see we So safia nrdcoycmet htflosi by is follows what comment, introductory final a As Breakthrough The called program brief a had NASA h rtqeto n ih s s htwuda ob- an would what is, ask might one question first The = − 0. iglrte n h ilto fcosmic of violation the and singularities d mMG/r .Ohrsrrsn ffcsicuethe include effects surprising Other d. ∗ l.I diin re okit the into look brief a addition, In ell. nsa rpris uha the as such properties, unusual l ETNA PHYSICS NEWTONIAN 2 r ˆ where M stems fteerh say. earth, the of mass the is F = mMG/r F = − m 2 a r ˆ Thus . where m is 2

It is interesting to consider a negative mass object near NON-GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTIONS a positive mass of equal magnitude. As we saw above, the negative mass is attracted to the positive mass, but the One of the most amazing properties of negative mass positive mass is repelled by the negative mass, so we find, has been sometimes referred to as its armor piercing abil- negative mass chases positive mass. Thus if a negative ity. The stronger the armor, the more quickly the nega- mass particle is created near a positive mass particle, the tive mass will disintegrate it. To see this, suppose a neg- pair will accelerate, approaching the speed of light. One ative mass object is traveling to the right and it hits a may check both energy and momentum are conserved for wall. The wall, through electromagnetic forces and quan- such an unusual “particle.” As mentioned, Bondi did the tum mechanics, exerts a force to left, just as it would for general relativistic calculation.[5] a positive mass. But when we apply Newton’s law of Suppose these two particles were very far apart, where motion to the negative mass object, F = ma, we see we assume the potential energy to be zero. Suppose also that it accelerates to the right, opposite the− direction of the negative mass particle is fixed and the positive mass the force acting on it. Now the electronic orbitals are particle is pushed to a distance a of the negative mass. squeezed even more, exerting an ever increasing force on 2 The work it takes is m G/a, which is the potential en- the object. And so it will blast though the wall, acceler- ergy, and which is also obtained by our simple rule of ating all the while (for the sake of argument we assume letting m m. Thus to create such a pair would take the negative mass is “stronger” than the wall, say nega- →−2 the energy m G/a and one can speculate on models of tive mass steel against concrete). real particles, but so far we have restricted ourselves to This would explain why negative mass on earth has gravitational interactions. not been found. First, it would fall to the earth. Then it Our notions about bound states and total energy would receive a mighty boost as it drills it way through should be checked. We say that a positive mass attracts the earth, being flung out far above the escape velocity negative mass, so the a negative mass planet, m, could on the other side. − orbit the sun of mass M. In this case the potential en- On the other hand, if negative mass is found one would ergy is mMG/r which is positive, but kinetic energy is have to be careful in handling it. For example, if you are mv2/2. One may show the virial theorem, kinetic en- playing catch with a negative mass ball and it is coming − ergy is equal to minus one half the gravitational potential toward you, you must reach behind the ball and pull it energy, holds, but in this case the total energy is positive. towards you to slow it down. Throwing it would take new found skills as well. There are a host of additional interesting problems one antigravity? may work out. Consider a positive mass particle with plus charge and an equal but negative mass negatively It has long been speculated that negative mass may charged particle. This time, ignoring the gravitational be used to shield gravity. The value of such a thing is force, we find the positive charge chases the negative self evident, but is it possible? Suppose we had a thin charge. negative mass carpet of density σ gm cm−2. We already Another interesting idea is the toy model of the photon. noted that negative mass falls− toward the earth, and so Consider a particle of positive mass m and plus charge e will this carpet. The gravitational field, g, outside an and an equal but negative mass particle of minus charge e. Let us suppose they are created a distance L apart isolated carpet is g = 2Gσrˆ where as always rˆ points − away from the mass. This is valid for an infinite carpet, and ask, what would happen. First we see the net mass or approximately true close to the center of the finite is zero so the total energy U is carpet. 2 2 Now consider the gravitational field above the carpet Gm e U = − (2) which is lying on the ground, fixed in place (somehow). L The field is and is positive if m > e/√G. In terms of the Planck 3 mass LP = G~/c , this condition is m > 2√αmP 2 ~ MG where α = e p/ c is the fine structure constant and the g = rˆ +2Gσrˆ (1) 2 − R2 Planck mass is mP = c LP /2G. These are Newtonian considerations but the actual numerical results are not where M and R are the mass and radius of the earth. important, they show there is a continuum of positive This vanishes if σ = M/2R2, which is about 7 109 gm (and negative) energy solutions. In the spirit of nega- cm−2. Thus we could float an object of any mass,× but tive mass, let us look at the concept of negative energy it would take the (negative) mass of a small asteroid to photons, i. e., the case m < 2√αmP . Let us further make one square meter, so we may rule out this form of suppose the gravitational force is negligible compared to antigravity. the electromagnetic force. 3

Suppose we look at the equation of motion of the neg- QUANTUM MECHANICS ative mass particle. The equation of motion is Consider the simple problem of a particle of mass m in a one dimensional box of length L and height V . The dvσ e = F σµv (3) Schr¨odinger equation for positive mass reduces to dτ mc µ

µν where F is the electromagnetic field tensor.[8] Note the d2ψ 2m(E V ) + − ψ = 0 (10) minus signs in e/m cancel, so we have the same equation dx2 ~2 of motion for the positive mass particle, as expected. Assuming the motion is along the x direction we call with V = 0 inside. Suppose the total energy E (positive) v1 = dx/dτ where τ is the proper time, and v0 = cdt/dτ. is less than V . Then we know there are (depending on The equations of motion (3) become the parameters) oscillatory solutions inside the well and decaying exponentials outside. We interpret this as a bound particle. 0 dv e 01 For negative mass we have = F v1 (4) dτ mc 1 dv e 10 d2ψ 2m(E V ) = F v0 − ψ = 0 (11) dτ mc dx2 − ~2 and the solutions are and the above remarks are reversed. We expect this, because it is telling us the particle is repelled from the well. 0 v = c coshΩτ (5) It is interesting to consider a square hill (opposite of v1 = c sinh Ωτ well, it tends to push particles away) of height V . One may show this can yield oscillatory solutions inside the where Ω = eE/mc and the magnitude of the constant hill and decaying exponentials outside. This is the quan- electric field is E = e/L2. This is the well-known case tum mechanical analog of a small negative mass particle of hyperbolic motion. The results above are given in near a large negative mass particle. the rest frame of the particle with proper time τ. The These are quite general considerations. Let’s look at relation to lab frame time t is obtained from the definition the hydrogen aMary. Instead of re-deriving everything of v0 given above, so that that is already in textbooks, we will follow along the standard derivation[9] and note the radial function u, for large r, is dt = coshΩτ (6) dτ 2 d u 2mE + u. (12) so dr2 ~2 1 From this we observe spatially confined (bound) states t = sinh Ωτ. (7) Ω occur when E is negative. For a negative mass electron it is just the opposite. Bound states exist, but they have Using this we may find the velocity as measured in the total positive energy. As a suggested problem one may lab vlab = dr/dt, which becomes investigate whether negative mass positrons are bound to the proton, making an interesting charged hydrogen-like cΩt aMary. v = . (8) Relativistic quantum mechanics is governed by the lab √1+Ω2t2 Dirac equation, The time scale controlling the dynamics is Ω which is

a imc γ Daψ + ~ ψ = 0 (13) e2 Ω= . (9) mcL2 where D represents the covariant derivative describing the interaction. I will not pursue this further except to If we take some reasonable value for L, say 10−15 cm, Ω say the mass reversal m m mentioned in the intro- is of the order of 1027 sec−1, which shows in an immea- duction, from a local gauge→ − theory point of view, has surably short time the object is traveling at essentially recently been shown to be associated with the intrinsic the speed of light. spin of the particle.[2] 4

GENERAL RELATIVITY Finally let us consider Mary and Homer, twins who are far from the black hole. Homer stays home, but Mary One of the most fascinating predictions of general rel- decides to explore the black hole and lets herself fall in. ativity is the black hole. The solution for the metric What does Homer see? Homer calculates it takes an tensor, gµν , exterior to a spherically symmetric mass is infinite amount of time for Mary to reach rh, but as far as Mary is concerned she falls right through the event horizon, after which, she can no longer communicate to 2 µ ν ds = gµν dx ds (14) Homer.[11] 2 k 2 2 dr Now we may consider the Schwarzchild solution for 1 dt dΩ  − r  − − 1 k negative mass. We saw above that negative mass repels − r negative mass, so collapse is not possible. But there has where k is a constant of integration and ds = cdτ and, been interest in the meaning of the Schwarzchild solu- as before, τ is the proper time. To make this reduce to tion for negative mass particles.[12] In addition, there Newtonian physics we must set k =2MG/c2. is another possibility: A collection of charged negative This solution has embarrassed and fascinated us since mass particles will be self attractive and could in prin- Schwarzchild derived it. The center of interest is the ap- ciple collapse! In this case the metric is given by the parent singularity at r = rh. It was embarrassing in the Reissner-Nordstr¨om solution. Far away the gravitational early days of general relativity because singularities in- effects of the charge fall off faster than the mass term, so dicate the breakdown of physics. But if, for example, we in this limit it looks like the usual Schwarzchild solution. put M as the sun’s mass, rh, which is called the event In any case for negative mass (15) becomes horizon, is about 3 km. But remember, this is valid only exterior to the mass, so the sun would have to be squeezed 2MG into a volume of radius less than 3 km. Stars were known dτ = 1+ dt (16) r c2r to be much bigger, so this situation was not widely stud- ied. and we see there is no coordinate singularity. In other When it was realized stars could collapse there was words, there is no event horizon. There is no black hole. renewed interest. As an example of the physical signifi- In the often ironic development in science, it is inter- cance in general relativity, the r,θ,φ,t are called coordi- esting to see the reaction to the concept of a naked singu- nate values and are the same as those very far away. For larity. At first, many did not believe black holes existed. example if dr = dθ = dφ = 0, then (14) gives Now, such objects are observed at the center of galax- ies and are taken for granted, but naked singularities are anathema. They expose a breakdown in physics (the sin- 2MG dτ = 1 dt (15) gularity) to the outside world that is so unacceptable, to r − c2r some, that the cosmic censorship hypothesis has been for- which is telling us time, as measured by an observer near mulated, which tells us all singularities are hidden. For the sun, dτ, runs slower than time as measured by some- some of the controversy one may consult a few recent one far away, who measures dt. Einstein suggested this papers.[13][14][15] as a test of his theory and now is considered one of the Now, with a negative mass Schwarzchild solution (it is basic tests that proves his theory. tempting to say negative mass black hole, but it is not a black hole if the mass is negative), one may calculate One may ask, what happens as r rh. It seems time stands still, so this is also called the→ surface of infinite how long Homer sees it takes Mary to reach rh, and it redshift. All this is discussed extensively in textbooks, is a finite number, no longer infinity as for the positive and perhaps the most well-known result is, once an ob- mass. In fact, Mary may dip under rh and zoom back server falls within the event horizon, there is no escape. out, as long as the tidal forces were not too big. To this day this sparks controversy, particularly when If such objects do exist they are nothing like black one asks about where the information went that fell into holes. In fact they are more like cosmic particle accelera- the black hole. tors. For example, if a like charge mass were created near The result of all this is, the singularity at the origin this object it would be expelled, and if it were created (r = 0) where physics does indeed breakdown, is hidden near r = 0 it could acquire enormous energy. from our universe. If a singularity is not hidden from For positive mass let us write (15) as sight by the event horizon, then it is called a naked sin- ∆τ gularity. I should add the apparent singularity at r = rh ∆t = . (17) is not a singularity, but a manifestation of the coordi- 2MG 1 c2r nate system. For example, the curvature tensor, which q − determines whether space is curved, is well defined there, This formula describes particles at rest exterior to an although it is singular at the origin.[10] object of mass M. An example would be the atoms on 5 the surface of the sun (neglecting their brownian motion). which T µν = ρvµvν which assumes matter, on a cosmic Those atoms measure proper time τ. Far away, say the average, is described by a uniform mass density ρ which earth, we measure t, so if an interval ∆τ goes by on the exerts no pressure. sun, we measure a time ∆t which is longer than ∆τ. This Einstein tried to find a static solution, including the is the well-known redshift effect. As r rh, ∆t goes to pressure terms, but came to the conclusion there was no infinity. → such solution to (19), and unable to divine future obser- For a negative mass star we have vations, modified these equations by adding λgµν , where λ is known as the cosmological constant. In essence the cosmological constant balanced the gravitational self at- ∆τ ∆t = (18) traction, or in other words, the cosmological constant 2MG 1+ c2r provided a repulsive force against gravity. q
In the 1920s Alexander Friedmann discovered a time which shows the light emanating from the star is blue dependent solution and the cosmological constant was no shifted. As r rh, ∆t = ∆τ/√2 but the singularity at longer needed. In this case there are two unknowns, the the origin is a→ point of infinite blue shift. density ρ and the distance parameter or what is called Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of black holes is the radius of the universe a(t). In addition there are the wormhole, also known as the Einstein-Rosen bridge. three kinds of possible geometries, flat space (but not It turns out the coordinates used to display the solution flat spacetime), space of positive curvature, and space (14) cover only half of spacetime, there is another dis- of negative curvature. These are characterized by k = tinct region that is asymptotically flat, called a white 0, 1, 1 respectively. − hole, that is connected by the wormhole. This other re- Einstein’s equations (19) yield, for positive mass, gion of space could be anywhere in the universe and so, there is the fascinating theoretical possibility of drop- ′ 2 2 ping through a wormhole and exiting somewhere quite a 3kc 8πGρ =3 + 2 (20) distant, and do this in much less time than it would take  a  a a light ray, not taking the wormhole, to reach there. So, can we reach Andromeda in an hour? Maybe. Details of a′′ the wormhole have been worked out in the Am. J. Phys. 4πGρ = 3 (21) article cited.[7] − a One of the problems is that the wormhole is a not a where a′ = da/dt. static structure, it is violent and pinches off in a short The solutions are given in any text on general relativity time. Thus, means must be found to keep it open. In (see [10] for example) and it gives the following physical order to accomplish this some kind of exotic matter must picture. The universe began with a big bang and ex- be used, and negative mass is a possibility. panded to its present day. However, since the matter in the universe is attractive, trying to pull itself together, the rate of expansion was slowing down. To describe this Cosmology we have the deceleration q is defined as q = a′′a/a′2, which, due to the built in minus sign, is positive− if the One of the most amazing properties of Einstein’s equa- rate of expansion is slowing. tions is they can be applied to the universe as a whole and Until recently this is exactly what was observed, but describe its properties. Einstein was the first to do this due to the development of CCD cameras, and a better un- but it was before the systematic redshift of distant galax- derstanding of supernovae, Riess[16] and Perlmutter[17] ies was discovered by Vesto Slipher and Edwin Hubble, turned this picture upside down. In his Nobel Lecture which show the universe is expanding. Perlmutter said, “Apparently we don’t live in a Universe Einstein’s theory of general relativity reads that is currently slowing in its expansion, but rather a Universe with one of the more interesting histories ... Its 8πG expansion rate used to be slowing, but has been speeding Gµν = T µν (19) up for the last half of its history, and presumably could c4 speed up forever.”[18] Riess put it this way, “But what I where Gµν , the Einstein tensor, is a second order non- initially measured and wrote in my lab notebook in the linear differential operator of the metric tensor gµν , and fall of 1997 was stunning! The only way to match the the energy momentum tensor on the right hand side rep- change in the expansion rate I was seeing was to allow resent matter. In the Schwarzchild solution, T µν is zero, the universe to have a negative mass. In other words, up- but in cosmological scenarios it is not. ending the equation, the Universe wasn’t decelerating at This is not the place to go into great detail, but we all - it was accelerating...!”[19] may mention the simple dust model of the universe in So, let us consider a negative mass universe, 6

in this case our usual Minkowski spacetime with metric 2 ηµν . In this case the object sweeps out a world-sheet in a′ 3kc2 8πGρ =3 + (22) spacetime. The induced metric on the world-sheet is −  a  a2

∂xµ ∂xν ′′ γ = η (26) a αβ µν ∂ξα ∂ξβ 4πGρ = 3 . (23) − − a where µ and ν run from 0 to 3 (target space) while α Looking at (22) we see that k must be negative. The and β run over the two string coordinates and, in (26), deceleration parameter, from (23), is negative, indicat- xµ = xµ(ξ0, ξ1). Let us call ξ0 = τ and ξ1 = σ. The ing a universe that universe has always been increasing. action of the string may be written as Today the “dark energy” is used to describe the mysteri- ous force pulling our universe apart at an ever increasing rate. There have been many conjectures, but no one is I = T dτdσ√ γ (27) sure what dark energy is.[20] − Z Z − Einstein’s theory not only applies to cosmology as a whole but also to astrophysical problems on the cosmic where γ = det(γαβ ). scale. For example it is well know that since gravity If we assume momentarily √ γ=1, as it would be in a curves space, light rays passing around a galaxy can flat two dimensional space, and− integrate along the string L 2 be curved, giving the effect called lensing. Lensing ef- such that 0 dσ = L then, with T = mc /L, we see (27) fects due to negative mass have been considered in the reduce toR (25). For negative mass, everything follows literature.[21] with m replaced by m and a negative tension. − The concept of negative tension makes sense for a neg- ative mass string. We saw before that negative mass par- STRINGS ticles repel each other, so this naturally extends to the concept of a negative mass string expanding, as negative String theory, by which is really meant superstring the- tension would indicate. ory, is a well studied branch of research. Whether or not Cosmic strings are relativistic strings but, unlike those it is at all a realistic description of nature is yet to be of string theory, are of cosmic proportion. They have determined. One of the bizarre results of string theory a fascinating property and effect space much differently is that it only makes sense in 10 or 11 dimensions. This than point mass matter. Perhaps the most well-known result is due to the quantization conditions, and there result is exterior to a straight string. The spacetime is is no fundamental problem with having strings in three flat. Thus, unlike ordinary matter, straight strings do not dimensional space (four dimensional spacetime). Cos- curve space, yet they are detectable! The concomitant mic strings are one example[22] and general relativity is peculiarity is that if go you around the string at fixed another.[23] distance r exactly once, the distance is C = (2π ∆)r The physics of a non-relativistic string is well-known. where ∆ = 8πGT/c4 is called the deficit angle. − The wave equation for the displacement y is Such an effect may be seen from the apparent direc- 2 2 tion of distance known stars, the rays of which pass near ∂ y µ ∂ y 2 2 (24) the string. For a negative mass (negative tension) ∆ be- ∂x − T ∂t comes the surplus angle and such effects may someday where µ is the mass per unit length and T is the tension be measured. in the string. This will admit wave solutions as long as µ and T have the same sign. Thus we consider negative mass strings with negative tension. SUMMARY Similar ideas hold for the relativistic string, but before we tackle that, let us consider the action of a relativistic The concept of negative mass and some physics of neg- point particle of positive mass: ative mass particles was examined. Some of the unusual effects examined were, negative mass chasing positive mass, and positive charge chasing negative mass. Other I = mc2 dτ, (25) − Z effects described were the armor piercing property of neg- ative mass, quantum mechanical effects, and the concept which sweeps out a line in spacetime. of a mass reversed black hole, which we saw was not black Now let us consider a string with coordinates ξµ with hole. Finally some introductory remarks about negative µ = 0, 1 which exists in what is called a target space, mass strings were made. 7

York, 1972) [11] R. T. Hammond, Am. J. Phys., 56, 27 (1988).

∗ [12] J. Belletete and M. B. Paranjape, “On negative mass,” Electronic address: [email protected] arXiv:1304.1566v1 [gr-qc] 4 Apr 2013. [1] J. Tiomno, Nuovo Cimento 1, 226 (1955); J.J. Sakurai, [13] T. Torii H. and Maeda Phys. Rev. D 72 064007 (2005) Nuovo Cimento 7, 649 (1958). [14] U. Miyamoto and H. Maeda, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 31, 157 [2] R. T. Hammond, Rel. Grav. 42, 2345-2348, 2010; Int. J. (2006). Mod. Phys. D, (2011). [15] R J. Gleiser and G. Dotti, arXiv:gr-qc/0604021. [3] A. Borde, L. H. Ford, and T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D [16] A. G. Riess, et al., Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998). 65, 084002 (2002). [17] S. Perlmutter, et al. , Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999). [4] J. N. Goldberg in Studies in the History of General [18] S. Perlmutter, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel prizes/ Relativity, vol. 3 (Eds. J. Eisenstaedt and A. J. Knox, physics/laureates/2011/perlmutter-lecture.pdf Burkh¨auser, Boston, 1988), pages 89-102. [19] A. G. Riess, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel prizes/ [5] H. Bondi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 423 (1957). physics/laureates/2011/riess lecture.pdf [6] URL: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/. [20] R. T. Hammond and T. Pilling, Phys. Essays, 24, (2011). [7] M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 [21] D. F. Torres, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13 1575 (1998) (1988). [22] A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and [8] J. D. Jackson Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Sons, New York 1975, 2nd ed.) Cambridge, 1994). [9] E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York, [23] R. T. Hammond, Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 347 (2000). 1970. [10] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New