DOCSLIB.ORG

N94-25022 Unclas G3/15 0204256

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
N94-25022 Unclas G3/15 0204256 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940020540 2020-06-16T16:27:43+00:00Z N94-25022 Unclas G3/15 0204256 _-_ The University of Michigan PRESENTS l '--'_"_.....: : .......;: Air Launched Space Booster -.j'.......'" .... June, 1993 NASA/USRA Preface - Table of Contents Table of Contents Pr"_ce Foreword iV Class Organization Structure Class Photograph \:i Technical Team Specialties Symbol List ix References xiii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 History of the Air Launched Space Booster 1.2 Design Process 1.3 Overview of the Gryphon Chapter 2: Spacecraft Integration ii i i 111111 iii 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 The Bottom Line: Cost 14 2.3 Vehicle Configuration 17 2.4 Saftey Precautions 27 2.5 Conclusion 27 C h,apter 3: _ Analysis 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Mission Definition 29 3.3 Ascent Trajectory 30 3.4 Geosynchronous Missions 40 3.5 Spin Rates 45 3.6 Vehicle Aerodynamics 45 3.7 Mission Timeline 53 3.8 Future Work 54 Chapter 4: Propulsion 4.1 Introduction 57 4.2 Engines 57 4.3 Staging 65 4.4 Propellants 73 4.5 Propellant Tanks and Insulation 79 4.6 Future Work 89 4.7 Conclusion 91 Chapter 5: Payloads 5.1 Introduction 93 5.2 Payload Goals 93 5.3 Payload Market 94 5.4 Determination of Payload Bay Dimensions 97 5.5 Payload Limitations 99 5.6 Structural Considerations 100 5.7 Space Station Freedom Options 102 ii The University of Michigan Project Gryphon 5.8 Conclusions 104 Chapter 6:: Mission Control 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Guidance, Navigation, and Control 1_7 6.3 On-Board Computer System 113 6.4 Communications Systems llS 6.5 Conclusion 121 Chapter 7: Structures 7.1 Structures Group Responsibilities 7.2 Main Booster Structure 124 7.3 Design of Payload Shroud and Solid Booster Fairings t36 7.4 Payload Interface 166 7.5 Engine Mounts 176 7.6 lnterstage Rings 184 7.7 Conclusion/Future Work 186 Chapter 8: Power/Thermal/Attitude g.l Introduction 189 8.2 The Attitude Control System 189 8.3 Power System 195 8.4 Thermal Control System 200 8.5 Venting System 201 Chapter: 9: Aircraft Integration 9.1 Introduction 208 9.2 Gryphon Assembly Building 208 9.3 Transporting the Gryphon 213 9.4 Ground Fueling 216 9.5 Aircraft/Booster Interface 229 9.6 Power and Fuel Connections 233 9.7 Placement of Support System on Eclipse 234 9.8 Future Work 236 Chapter 10: Conclusion and Future Work 10.1 Introduction 239 10.2 Summary 239 10.3 Design Status 239 10.4 Future Work 240 Appendicies : 242 Appendix A Spacecraft Integration 249 Appendix B Mission Analysis 259 Appendix C Propulsion Appendix D Payloads 263 Appendix E Mission Control 268 Appendix F Structures 274 Appendix G Power/Thermal/Attitude 305 Appendix H Aircraft Integration 315 iii Preface - Class Organization Foreword Tile project chosen/or the winter semester Aero 483 class was the design of a next generation Air Launched Space Booster. Based on Orbital Sciences Corporation's Pegasus concept, the goal of Aero 483 was to design a 500,000 pound air launched space booster capable of delivering 17,000 pounds of payload to Low Earth Orbit and 8,000 pounds of payload to Geosynchronous Earth Orbit. The resulting launch vehicle was named the Gryphon. The class was led by ProJect Manager Brad King and Assistant Manager Mike Fisher. The class of forty senior aerospace engineering students was broken down into eight interdependent groups. Each group was assigned a subsystem or responsibility which then became their field of ,,pecialization. Spacecraft Integration was responsible for ensuring compatibility between subsystems. This group kept up to date on subsystem redesigns and informed those parties affected by the changes, monitored the vehicle's overall weight and dimensions, and calculated the mass properties of the booster. This group also performed the cost/profitability analysis of the Gryphon and obtained cost data for competing launch systems. The Mission Analysis Group was assigned the task of determining proper orbits, calculating the vehicle's flight trajectory for those orbits, and determining the aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicle. The Propulsion Group chose the engines that were best suited to the mission. This group also set the staging configurations for those engines and designed the tanks and fuel feed system. The commercial satellite market, dimensions and weights of typical satellites, and method of deploying satellites was determined by the Payloads Group. In addition, Payloads identified possible resupply packages for Space Station Freedom and identified those packages that were compatible with the Gryphon. The guidance, navigation, and control subsystems were designed by the Mission Control Group. This group identified required tracking hardware, communications hardware, telemetry systems, and ground sites for the location of the Gryphon's mission control center. The Structures group was responsible for ensuring the structural integrity of the vehicle. Their designs included the payload shroud, payload support structure, exterior hull, and engine support struts. The Gryphon's power requirements were determined by the Power/Thermal/Attitude Control Group. This group then selected suitable batteries and other components to meet these requirements. The group also designed heat shielding and cooling systems to ensure subsystem performance. In addition to these responsibilities this group designed the attitude control methods and RCS components for the vehicle. The Aircraft Integration Group was responsible for all aspects of the booster- aircraft connection. This included the design of the connection structure and the drop mechanism. This group also designed the vehicle assembly facility and identified possible ground bases for the plane. iv Preface - Class Organization Structure I ::. -" 'L31 -_ ,,I _q L ?. a.a -_ _E .,..4 <_ _ Z_. _q L.. i I _2_ > I ! g A _._ e',wj L_ L_ < ! "_. V Preface - Class Photograph z •j....:, _ _" _. _-- _Z _._= : ..,_ ¢ g _ _'_ _. ._ ._ =_'=o 2= • ._ ! ! ( ,._ -: 0 o- University of Michigan Aerospace Project Gryphon The following lists each member's area of technical expertise within the University of Michigan's Aerospace Space System Design Project Gryphon. Project Manager Brad King Daily Agenda Assistant Project Manager Mike Fisher Administration Spacecraft Integration Leader - Elizabeth Hilbert Overall Configuration Tim Ballew Cost and Financing David Cortright Saftey Todd Mueller Cost and Financing Dan Potter Axis System Mission Analysis Leader - Alan Ristow Trajectory Rick Draper Mission Timeline Sean Fifield Orbits Scott Mullison Spin Rates Vince Wiltse Aerodynamics Propulsion Leader - Krista Campbell Solid Fuel Engines Chad Hoggard Cryogenic Fuels Adam Nagaj Tank/Staging Design Bilal Rathur LR91 s/Storable Fuels John Vandenberg Stage Optimization Payloads Leader - Kari Jacobson Space Station Options Chris Bernard Weights and Sizing James Dice Market Kevin Whalen Payload Limitations Craig Litherland Structural Aspects Mission Control Leader - Scott Egbert GPS/Air Support Kah-Wai Aw On-board Computer Brian Smith Inertial Guidance Chris Yee Communications vii Preface - Technical Team Specialties Structures Leader- Joe Ruddy Shroud Design Scott Huggins lnterstage Design Wolfgang Schubert Dynamic Analysis Ron Shin>hock Fairing Analysis Phil Wojcik Payload Interface Power/Thermal/Attitude Leader- Joc Rcgner Release Analysis Josh Baron Power Systems Tom Godfrov Venting System Kcvin Kilburn Thermal Control Romy Shaneff Attitude Control Aircraft Integration Leader- Mike Hindley Aircraft Interface Jon Albert Auxiliary Connections Adam Koziel Attachment Design Chris Vegter Production Site Wind Tunnel Model Leader - Chad Hoggard Flow Visualization Tom Godfroy Model Construction Chris Yee Technical Presentation Mike Hindley Data Recording CAD Leader- Mike Fisher System Coordination Kevin Whalen Integration Adam Koziel Attachment Structure Joe Ruddy Shroud & Fairings Adam Nagaj Propulsion System Display Model Leader - Mike Fisher Component Integration Lee Ann Bird Detailing Elizabeth Hilbert Technical Support Final Report Publication Leader- Mike Fisher Editor in Chief Krista Campbell Technical Integration Elizabeth Hilbert Technical Editing Scott Egbert Processing Support Vince Wiitse Technical Editing viii Universityof MichiganAerospaceProject Gryphon Symbol List $ Dollar A Area C_ ,Angle of attack a Speed of sound AC 41lernating Current Acl Area of clean room AKM Apogee Kick Motor AI Launch azitnuth anz]c ANC Aft Nozzle Co,,cr Orbit semi-ma/or axis A_a ,Area of stage assembly room Asi Area of Stage Integration room Yaw angle BER Bit Rate Error c Speed of light CAD Computer Aided Design Col Cost of clean room CD Coefficient of drag Cdo Zero lift coefficient of drag CG Center of gravity CL Coefficient of lift CM Center of Mass Cm Coefficient of pitching moment Cn Coefficient of yaw moment CP Center of pressure Cp Coefficient of sideforce CPU Central Processing Unit Cr Coefficient of rolling moment Cs Cost of stage room D Drag d Diameter d;u-m Distance of lever arm dB Decible DC Direct Current Dc Drag at cruise launch doom Distance of connectors on lever arm DDAS Digital Data Acquisition System Df Diameter of Fireball dT Fuel tank diameter AV Change in velocity E Modulus of elasticity E Emissivity e Orbit eccentricity ECEF Earrth-centered, earth-fixed Es Structural coefficient °F Degrees Fahrenheit 0 Angle between body and inertial axis f Frequency of signal ix Preface - Symbol List FCC Federal Communications Commision FCS Flight Control System Fhydraulic Hydraulic force Fpin Forces on a pin fs Sample rate FT Thrust ft Foot FTS Flight Tcrmination Sv ,,tern Fx Aerodynamic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Aerospace Rocket Program
    NYC Aerospace Rocket Program NYC Aerospace’s 100,000ft rocket program is committed to designing and manufacturing a sounding rocket to reach 100,000ft, above 99% of the atmosphere. The purpose of this mission is to research the applications of ammonium perchlorate composite propellant (APCP) to large rockets. Many future aerospace engineers have learned a great deal about rocketry from participating in this project, which is one of NYC Aerospace’s many projects involving students citywide. Rocket details Our goal is to send a single-stage rocket to 100,000ft using ammonium perchlorate composite propellant (APCP). In order to reach this altitude, the rocket will likely need to maintain structural integrity at velocities on the order of Mach 2 and above. Therefore, the rocket body will need to be made of a light metal such as aluminum or titanium. A metal body necessitates the capacity of the rocket motor to be in the O range of near 30,000Ns of impulse. Assuming a perfectly efficient motor, this requires around 30lb of propellant. We can calculate fuel fraction by first establishing our delta v budget. Δv = √2gz = √2(9.8m/s2)(30480m) =772m/s= mach 2.25 Using the delta v necessary, we can calculate the minimum fuel fraction using Tsiolkovsky’s ideal rocket equation. Assuming the specific impulse of our motor is 228s: m final Δv =− v eln m initial m final = exp(− 772/2280) = 0.71 m initial Thus, we only need 29% of our rocket to be fuel. This brings the max mass of our rocket to 103lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Probe on Space Launch System (Sls)
    INTERSTELLAR PROBE ON SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) David Alan Smith SLS Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution (SPIE) NASA-MSFC December 13, 2019 0497 SLS EVOLVABILITY FOUNDATION FOR A GENERATION OF DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION 322 ft. Up to 313ft. 365 ft. 325 ft. 365 ft. 355 ft. Universal Universal Launch Abort System Stage Adapter 5m Class Stage Adapter Orion 8.4m Fairing 8.4m Fairing Fairing Long (Up to 90’) (up to 63’) Short (Up to 63’) Interim Cryogenic Exploration Exploration Exploration Propulsion Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Launch Vehicle Interstage Interstage Interstage Stage Adapter Core Stage Core Stage Core Stage Solid Solid Evolved Rocket Rocket Boosters Boosters Boosters RS-25 RS-25 Engines Engines SLS Block 1 SLS Block 1 Cargo SLS Block 1B Crew SLS Block 1B Cargo SLS Block 2 Crew SLS Block 2 Cargo > 26 t (57k lbs) > 26 t (57k lbs) 38–41 t (84k-90k lbs) 41-44 t (90k–97k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) Payload to TLI/Moon Launch in the late 2020s and early 2030s 0497 IS THIS ROCKET REAL? 0497 SLS BLOCK 1 CONFIGURATION Launch Abort System (LAS) Utah, Alabama, Florida Orion Stage Adapter, California, Alabama Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle RL10 Engine Lockheed Martin, 5 Segment Solid Rocket Aerojet Rocketdyne, Louisiana, KSC Florida Booster (2) Interim Cryogenic Northrop Grumman, Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Utah, KSC Boeing/United Launch Alliance, California, Alabama Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter Teledyne Brown Engineering, California, Alabama Core Stage & Avionics Boeing Louisiana, Alabama RS-25 Engine (4)
    [Show full text]
  • Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z
    Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 1 Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z (The Aerospace En- gines, A-Z) Versión 12 2018 por Ricardo Miguel Vidal * * * -MOTOR: Máquina que transforma en movimiento la energía que recibe. (sea química, eléctrica, vapor...) Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 Este facsímil es < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 ORIGINAL si la Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © página anterior tiene Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 2 el sello con tinta Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal VERDE Edición: 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Presentación de la edición 2018-V12 (Incluye todas las anteriores versiones y sus Apéndices) La edición 2003 era una publicación en partes que se archiva en Binders por el propio lector (2,3,4 anillas, etc), anchos o estrechos y del color que desease durante el acopio parcial de la edición. Se entregaba por grupos de hojas impresas a una cara (edición 2003), a incluir en los Binders (archivadores). Cada hoja era sustituíble en el futuro si aparecía una nueva misma hoja ampliada o corregida. Este sistema de anillas admitia nuevas páginas con información adicional. Una hoja con adhesivos para portada y lomo identifi caba cada volumen provisional. Las tapas defi nitivas fueron metálicas, y se entregaraban con el 4 º volumen. O con la publicación completa desde el año 2005 en adelante. -Las Publicaciones -parcial y completa- están protegidas legalmente y mediante un sello de tinta especial color VERDE se identifi can los originales.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Almanac 2005
    SpaceAl2005 manac Stratosphere begins 10 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Low Earth orbit begins 60 miles 0.95G 100 miles Medium Earth orbit begins 300 miles 44 44 AIR FORCEAIR FORCE Magazine Magazine / August / August 2005 2005 SpaceAl manacThe US military space operation in facts and figures. Compiled by Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, and the staff of Air Force Magazine Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth orbit 22,300 miles 0.05G 60,000 miles NASA photo/staff illustration by Zaur Eylanbekov Illustration not to scale AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2005 AIR FORCE Magazine / /August August 2005 2005 4545 US Military Missions in Space Space Force Support Space Force Enhancement Space Control Space Force Application Launch of satellites and other Provide satellite communica- Assure US access to and freedom Pursue research and devel- high-value payloads into space tions, navigation, weather, mis- of operation in space and deny opment of capabilities for the and operation of those satellites sile warning, and intelligence to enemies the use of space. probable application of combat through a worldwide network of the warfighter. operations in, through, and from ground stations. space to influence the course and outcome of conflict. US Space Funding Millions of constant FY06 dollars $50,000 DOD 45,000 NASA 40,000 Other Total 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 59 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 02 04 Fiscal Year FY NASA DOD Other Total FY NASA DOD Other
    [Show full text]
  • Conestoga Launch Vehicles
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1988 (25th) Heritage - Dedication - Vision Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Conestoga Launch Vehicles Mark H. Daniels Special Projects Manager, SSI James E. Davidson Project Manager, SSI Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Daniels, Mark H. and Davidson, James E., "Conestoga Launch Vehicles" (1988). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1988-25th/session-11/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONESTOGA LAUNCH VEHICLES by Mark H. Daniels Special Projects Manager, SSI and James E. Davidson Project Manager, SSI launch into space. As such, it represents an Abstract important precedent for all other space launch companies. Several major applications for commercial and government markets have developed recently which In order to conduct the launch, the company will make use of small satellites. A launch solicited and received approvals from 18 different vehicle designed specifically for small satellites Federal agencies. Among these were the Air Force, brings many attendant benefits. Space Services the State Department, the Navy, and the Commerce Incorporated has developed the Conestoga family of Department. Commerce required SSI to obtain an launch vehicles to meet the needs of five major export license, due to the extra-territoriality of markets: low orbiting communication satellites, the vehicle's splashdown point. positioning satellites, earth sensing satellites, space manufacturing prototypes, and scientific Since that time, the company has organized a team experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology for Identifying Key Parameters Affecting Reusability for Liquid Rocket Engines
    Methodology for Identifying Key Parameters Affecting Reusability for Liquid Rocket Engines Presented by: Bruce Askins Rhonda Childress-Thompson Marshall Space Flight Center & Dr. Dale Thomas The University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline • Objective • Reusability Defined • Benefits of Reusability • Previous Research • Approach • Challenges • Available Data • Approach • Results • Next Steps • Summary Objective • To use statistical techniques to identify which parameters are tightly correlated with increasing the reusability of liquid rocket engine hardware. Reusability/Reusable Defined Ideally • “The ability to use a system for multiple missions without the need for replacement of systems or subsystems. Ideally, only replenishment of consumable commodities (propellant and gas products, for instance)occurs between missions.” (Jefferies, et al., 2015) For purposes of this research • Any space flight hardware that is not only designed to perform multiple flights, but actually accomplishes multiple flights. Benefits of Reusability • Forces inspections of returning hardware • Offers insight into how a part actually performs • Allows the development of databases for future development • Validates ground tests and analyses • Allows the expensive hardware to be used multiple times Previous Research – Identification of Features Conducive for Reuse Implementation 1. Reusability Requirement Implemented at the Conceptual Stage 2. Continuous Test Program 3. Minimize Post-Flight Inspections & Servicing to Enhance Turnaround Time 4. Easy Access 5. Longer Service Life 6. Minimize Impact of Recovery 7. Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary Changes MSFC Legacy of Propulsion Excellence (Evolutionary Changes) Saturn V J-2S 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015 Challenges • Engine data difficult to locate • Limited data for reusable engines (i.e. Space Shuttle, Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) and Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) • Benefits of reusability have not been validated • Industry standards do not exist Engine Data Available Engine Time from No.
    [Show full text]
  • High Delta V Nanosatellite Missions Using a Diverging Cusped Field Thruster
    High Delta V Nanosatellite Missions using a Diverging Cusped Field Thruster IEPC-2009-047 Presented at the 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA September 20{24, 2009 Ryan M. Daspit,∗ Christopher J. Han,y Paulo Lozano,z and David Millerx Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA The MIT satellite team is currently constructing the Cathode/Anode Satellite Technol- ogy for Orbital Repositioning (CASTOR) satellite as part of the 6th University Nanosatel- lite Program (UNP-6) Flight Competition. The objective of the CASTOR satellite is to verify the on-orbit performance of the Diverging Cusped Field Thruster (DCFT) developed at MIT. The DCFT is an electrostatic thruster based on a cusped magnetic field configu- ration to confine ionizing electrons through a combination of processes, including magnetic mirroring. The DCFT is currently undergoing integration and performance testing for use on the CASTOR satellite. A power processing unit (PPU) has been developed to optimally operate the DCFT during the satellite mission. Preliminary testing with the PPU has been successful and has allowed for the next stage in development of the PPU. Nomenclature T = thrust mo = total wet mass t = time a = vehicle acceleration Pa = anode power ηt = anode thrust efficiency c = exhaust velocity Isp = specific impulse g = acceleration due to gravity ∆V = velocity change ∗Graduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, [email protected]. yGraduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, [email protected]. zProfessor, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, [email protected]. xProfessor, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, [email protected]. 1 The 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, University of Michigan, USA September 20{24, 2009 I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Methodology for Preliminary Sizing of a Thermal and Energy Management System for a Hypersonic Vehicle
    A methodology for preliminary sizing of a Thermal and Energy Management System for a hypersonic vehicle. Roberta Fusaro1, Davide Ferretto 1, Valeria Vercella1, Nicole Viola1, Victor Fernandez Villace2 and Johan Steelant2 Abstract This paper addresses a methodology to parametrically size thermal control subsystems for high-speed transportation systems. This methodology should be sufficiently general to be exploited for the derivation of Estimation Relationships (ERs) for geometrically sizing characteristics as well as mass, volume and power budgets both for active (turbopumps, turbines and compressors) and passive components (heat exchangers, tanks and pipes). Following this approach, ad-hoc semi-empirical models relating the geometrical sizing, mass, volume and power features of each component to operating conditions have been derived. As a specific case, a semi-empirical parametric model for turbopumps sizing is derived. In addition, the Thermal and Energy Management Subsystem (TEMS) for the LAPCAT MR2 vehicle is used as an example of a highly integrated multifunctional subsystem. The TEMS is based on the exploitation of liquid hydrogen boil-off in the cryogenic tanks generated by the heat load penetrating the aeroshell, all along the point-to-point hypersonic mission. Eventually, specific comments about the results will be provided together with suggestions for future improvements. Keywords: Thermal and Energy Management System, sizing models, turbopumps, LAPCAT MR2 1. Introduction The high operating temperature characterizing the hypersonic flight regime is a long-term issue. Vehicles able to reach hypersonic speed are currently considered for both aeronautical (e.g. high speed antipodal transportation systems) and space transportation purposes (e.g. reusable launcher stages and re-entry systems).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Tube-Bundle Rocket Thrust Chamber
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19900015869 2020-03-19T22:32:33+00:00Z NASA Technical Memorandum 103139 AIAA-90-2726 Advanced Tube-Bundle Rocket Thrust Chamber John M. Kazaroff National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio and Albert J. Pavli Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio Prepared for the 26th Joint Propulsion Conference cosponsored by the AIAA, SAE, ASME, and ASEE Orlando, Florida, July 16-18, 1990 NASA ADVANCED TUBE-BUNDLE ROCKET THRUST CHAMBER John M. Kazaroff National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 and Albert J. Pavli Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Lewis Research Center Group Brook Park, Ohio 44142 o SUMMARY a- w An advanced rocket thrust chamber for future space application is described along with an improved method of fabrication. Potential benefits of the concept are improved cyclic life, reusability, reliability, and perform- ance. Performance improvements are anticipated because of the enhanced heat transfer into the coolant which will enable higher chamber pressure in expander cycle engines. Cyclic life, reusability and reliability improvements are anti- cipated because of the enhanced structural compliance inherent in the construc- tion. The method of construction involves the forming of the combustion chamber with a tube-bundle of high conductivity copper or copper alloy tubes, and the bonding of these tubes by an electroforming operation. Further, the method of fabrication reduces chamber complexity by incorporating manifolds, jackets, and structural stiffeners while having the potential for thrust cham- ber cost and weight reduction. BACKGROUND Through the years many forms of rocket combustion chamber construction have been successfully employed.
    [Show full text]