Zoic and Cxinozoic Periods Elucidated by Their CORXT. Fxv~As. by P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013
CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Flic en Flac, Mauritius, 31 July to 3 August 2012 REPORT OF THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS1 INTRODUCTION 1. In paragraph 36 of decision X/29, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), with regard to fisheries management, to organize, including the setting of terms of reference, a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) through the application of scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20, and other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20. 2. In the same decision (paragraph 41), the Conference of the Parties requested that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data and information and results collated through the workshops referred to above to participating Parties, other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies. -
Coral Reef Resilience Assessment of the Pemba Channel Conservation Area, Tanzania
Coral Reef Resilience Assessment of the Pemba Channel Conservation Area, Tanzania G. Grimsditch, J. Tamelander, J. Mwaura, M. Zavagli, Y. Takata, T. Gomez Published August 2009 from Survey in Febuary 2009 IUCN CLIMATE CHANGE AND CORAL REEFS WORKING GROUP I The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, CCCR, CORDIO, Pemba Alive, RAMSAR, or the Manta Resort concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, CCCR, CORDIO, Pemba Alive, RAMSAR, or the Manta Resort. We would like to thank the MacArthur Foundation and the Manta Resort for their generous support which made this study possible. We would also like to thank Ali Said, Pemba Channel Conservation Area (PeCCA), and Zahor Mohamed, Marine Conservation Unit, for enabling and assisting with this research. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2009 IUCN/CORDIO Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Grimsditch G., Tamelander J., Mwaura J., Zavagli M., Takata Y., Gomez T. -
(Anthozoa) from the Lower Oligocene (Rupelian) of the Eastern Alps, Austria
TO L O N O G E I L C A A P I ' T A A T L E I I A Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 59 (3), 2020, 319-336. Modena C N O A S S. P. I. Scleractinian corals (Anthozoa) from the lower Oligocene (Rupelian) of the Eastern Alps, Austria Rosemarie Christine Baron-Szabo* & Diethard Sanders R.C. Baron-Szabo, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, W-205, MRC 163, P.O. Box 37012, Washington DC, 20013- 7012 USA; Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany; [email protected]; Rosemarie.Baron- [email protected] *corresponding author D. Sanders, Institut für Geologie, Universität of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] KEY WORDS - Scleractinia, taxonomy, paleoecology, paleobiogeography. ABSTRACT - In the Werlberg Member (Rupelian pro parte) of the Paisslberg Formation (Eastern Alps), an assemblage of colonial corals of eleven species pertaining to eleven genera and eleven families was identified:Stylocoenia carryensis, Acropora lavandulina, ?Colpophyllia sp., Dendrogyra intermedia, Caulastraea pseudoflabellum, Hydnophyllia costata, Pindosmilia cf. brunni, Actinacis rollei, Pavona profunda, Agathiphyllia gregaria, and Faksephyllia faxoensis. This is the first Oligocene coral assemblage reported from the Paisslberg Formation (Werlberg Member) of the Eastern Alps, consisting exclusively of colonial forms. The assemblage represents the northernmost fauna of reefal corals reported to date for Rupelian time. The Werlberg Member accumulated during marine transgression onto a truncated succession of older carbonate rocks. The corals grew as isolated colonies and in carpets in a protected shoreface setting punctuated by high-energy events. Coral growth forms comprise massive to sublamellar forms, and branched (dendroid, ramose) forms. -
The Student's Elements of Geology
The Student's Elements of Geology Sir Charles Lyell The Student's Elements of Geology Table of Contents The Student's Elements of Geology.........................................................................................................................1 Sir Charles Lyell............................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE......................................................................................................................................................2 CHAPTER I. ON THE DIFFERENT CLASSES OF ROCKS.....................................................................2 CHAPTER II. AQUEOUS ROCKS. THEIR COMPOSITION AND FORMS OF STRATIFICATION......................................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER III. ARRANGEMENT OF FOSSILS IN STRATA. FRESH−WATER AND MARINE FOSSILS.....................................................................................................................................................14 CHAPTER IV. CONSOLIDATION OF STRATA AND PETRIFACTION OF FOSSILS.......................21 CHAPTER V. ELEVATION OF STRATA ABOVE THE SEA. HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED STRATIFICATION....................................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER VI. DENUDATION..................................................................................................................40 -
Chapter 7: Environmental Baseline – Offshore and Near Shore
Chapter 7 Environmental Baseline - Offshore and Near Shore CONTENTS 7 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE – OFFSHORE AND NEAR SHORE 7-1 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7-1 7.2 SUMMARY 7-1 7.2.1 Offshore Environment 7-1 7.2.2 Near Shore Environment 7-2 7.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION 7-3 7.3.1 Literature Sources 7-3 7.3.2 Baseline Surveys and Study Area 7-3 7.4 REGIONAL CONTEXT – QUIRIMBAS ARCHIPELAGO 7-3 7.5 OFFSHORE ENVIRONMENT – PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 7-6 7.5.1 Baseline Survey and Study Area 7-6 7.5.2 Major Circulation Patterns and Currents 7-8 7.5.3 Water Properties 7-11 7.5.4 Seabed Features 7-16 7.6 OFFSHORE ENVIRONMENT – MAJOR BIOLOGICAL FEATURES 7-22 7.6.1 Plankton 7-22 7.6.2 Benthos 7-23 7.6.3 Reef Structures 7-26 7.6.4 Fish 7-30 7.6.5 Whales and Dolphins 7-31 7.6.6 Seabirds 7-35 7.7 NEAR SHORE ENVIRONMENT – PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 7-37 7.7.1 Baseline Surveys and Survey Area 7-37 7.7.2 Bathymetry 7-39 7.7.3 Tides and Currents 7-41 7.7.4 Waves 7-42 7.7.5 Water Column – Properties 7-43 7.7.6 Sediment Properties and Seabed Features 7-51 7.7.7 Sediment Transport 7-57 7.7.8 Main Shoreline Types 7-57 7.8 NEAR SHORE ENVIRONMENT – MARINE HABITATS 7-58 7.8.1 Supratidal Sand Beach and Intertidal Sand/Mudflats 7-58 7.8.2 Mangroves 7-63 7.8.3 Seagrass 7-66 7.8.4 Coral 7-69 7.8.5 Shallow Coral Reefs and Outcrops 7-71 7.8.6 Fringing Coral Reef 7-74 7.9 NEAR SHORE ENVIRONMENT – MAJOR BIOLOGICAL FEATURES 7-93 7.9.1 Fish 7-93 7.9.2 Turtles 7-95 7.9.3 Whales and Dolphins 7-96 7.9.4 Seabirds 7-97 7 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE – OFFSHORE AND NEAR SHORE 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides -
UPPER JURASSIC) CORAL-DOMINATED REEFAL CARBONATES in WESTERN EUROPE (Volume 1: Text and Figures)
A SEDIMENTOLOGICAL AND PALAEOECOLOGICAL STUDY OF OXFORDIAN (UPPER JURASSIC) CORAL-DOMINATED REEFAL CARBONATES IN WESTERN EUROPE (Volume 1: Text and Figures) by Enzo Insalaco A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science of The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Earth Sciences Faculty o f Science The University of Birmingham November 1995 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. S ynopsis The Late Jurassic was a time of intense reef development across much of western Europe, which lay on the northern margin of Tethys. There is a considerable diversity of coral reef types in terms of their architecture and geometry, palaeoecology and sedimentary regime. However, although many of these reefal units have been locally studied, there has hitherto been a lack of a coherent synthesis of Late Jurassic reef carbonates. The Oxfordian (Upper Jurassic) of England, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland has been studied, and detailed comparative sedimentological and palaeoecological work has been carried out on twenty-four reef-bearing sections. This includes the description of a number of hitherto unstudied reef-bearing outcrops. -
Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective
2 World Heritage papers32 Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective The Western Indian Ocean Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective The Western Indian Ocean Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO 2012 All rights reserved ISBN 978-92-3-001072-0 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover photo: © Keith Ellenbogen Supervision and coordination: Fanny Douvere, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Agne Bartkute, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Authors: David Obura, CORDIO Julie Church, CORDIO Catherine Gabrié Denis Macharia, CORDIO (map assistance) Overall coordination: Fanny Douvere Coordination of the World Heritage Papers Series: Vesna Vujicic-Lugassy, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Graphic layout: Jean-Luc Thierry Prefered Reference: Obura, D.O., Church, J.E. and Gabrié, C. (2012). Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective: The Western Indian Ocean. World Heritage Centre, United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 124 pp. Website: -
Chumbe Island Coral Park—Governance Analysis
Marine Policy 41 (2013) 110–117 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Chumbe Island Coral Park—governance analysis Lina M. Nordlund a,b,n, Ulrike Kloiber b, Eleanor Carter c, Sibylle Riedmiller b a WIO CARE, PO Box 4199, Zanzibar, Tanzania b Chumbe Island Coral Park, PO Box 3203, Zanzibar, Tanzania c RARE Conservation, 1310N. Courthouse Road, Suite 110, VA 22201, USA article info abstract Available online 23 January 2013 Chumbe Island Coral Park Ltd (CHICOP), established in 1991 as the first managed marine park in Keywords: Tanzania, has become an international test case for sustainable private marine conservation funded by Private management ecotourism. The experiences, problems and achievements of CHICOP are described, in particular drivers No take area and incentives for committed on-site MPA management in the legal and institutional environment of Marine protected area Zanzibar. The employment of local fishers as park rangers proved cost-effective and facilitated Zanzibar partnership with local fishing communities, as did Environmental Education (EE) programs for local Tanzania schools and communities. Risks for private investors remain high though due to limited long-term Ecotourism security of tenure of leases and contracts. & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Ecotourism operations started in 1998. The intention was to develop a financially sustainable model of MPA management The East African coastal and marine environments suffer from through revenue generated from ecotourism, and the site was natural and anthropogenic disturbances mainly caused by rapid chosen for the high biodiversity of the shallow fringing coral reef population growth and widespread poverty. -
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study Report for the Proposed Shimoni Port, Kwale County
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study Report for the Proposed Shimoni Port, Kwale County Proponent Firm of Experts Kenya Ports Authority, Envasses Environmental Consultants Limited, P.O. BOX 95009-80104, Ralli House, MOMBASA. P.O. Box 2013-80100, MOMBASA. Version: Final Report Date: 19th October, 2020 Kenya Ports Authority: ESIA study for the proposed Shimoni Port Page ii CERTIFICATION Certification by Lead Experts We hereby certify that this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Study Report has been done under our supervision and that the assessment criteria, methodology and content reporting conform to the requirements of the Environmental Management and Coordination Act Cap. 387 of the Laws of Kenya. Signed: _______________________ _____________________ Names: Mr. Simon Nzuki (1350) Ms. Jane Gitau (2015) Contact details Envasses Environmental Consultants Limited, P.O. Box 2013-80100, Mombasa, Kenya. Tel: +254 722 347 155 Email: [email protected] Certification by Proponent We, Kenya Ports Authority, confirm that this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Study Report has been submitted to NEMA with our authority as the project proponent. Signed for and on behalf of Kenya Ports Authority Name: __________________________________________ Signature: __________________________ Designation: _____________________________________ Date: ______________________________ Proponent Contact Details Official Rubberstamp or Seal Kenya Ports Authority, P.O. Box 95009-80104, Mombasa, Kenya. Prepared By: Envasses Environmental Consultants Limited October 2020 Kenya Ports Authority: ESIA study for the proposed Shimoni Port Page iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The preparation of this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study Report was supported by the proponent, other government institutions, organizations, the local community and several individuals. The proponent provided the requisite logistical, financial, human resources and documentation on the Shimoni Port project. -
CASE STUDY the Challenge Actions Taken
CASE STUDY The Establishment of a Marine Eco-Park to Conserve Reefs and Support Environmental Education in Tanzania The Challenge Chumbe Island is a small coral island in East Africa just west of the island of Zanzibar, Tanzania. Chumbe Reef has been well recognized as one of the most diverse in all of Africa, and is believed to host 90% of East Africa’s hard coral species, as well as 425 reef fish species, the critically endangered Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) and the endangered Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas). The island’s coral-rag forest also possesses numerous rare, threatened and endangered species, such as the Aders’ duiker antelope (Cephalophus adersi), Coconut crab (Birgus latro), and various species of birds, trees and reptiles. Location of Chumbe Island, Zanzibar, Tanzania The western reef of Chumbe Island has been traditionally closed to fishing due to its proximity to the shipping channel between Zanzibar and mainland Tanzania. However, overfishing and destructive fishing practices such as dynamite fishing, smashing corals to encircle fish in nets, and beach seining are common in the region. With rapid population growth and the advent of mass tourism in Zanzibar, coral reefs are under pressure from overfishing, poaching and the use of illegal fishing methods. The situation at Chumbe Island is not uncommon for developing countries in the tropics: insufficient capacity for effective marine governance and enforcement, poverty, and lack of alternative livelihoods make it difficult to balance a sustainable environment and a sustainable community. Chumbe Reef, live-coral dominated area ©Chumbe Island Coral Park Actions Taken Recognizing the high level of biodiversity in both reef and forest habitats, Sibylle Riedmiller, a conservationist and former aid worker, spearheaded the establishment of the uninhabited island and surrounding marine habitat as the Chumbe Island Coral Park (CHICOP) in 1992. -
Al.Ch.Document.Puhc0
(LIM IT E 0 (LIM IT E 0 NOYP '1, MUSEUM STREET. LONDON. l.eGinea Per Anatturn 1'! I'k. k . :- Jk, c(b'ýpq ý.4,/ý,, lasi ZANZIBAR. VOL. II. il -1 SAV~AGE OF TBE NYIKA. V --! -a ZAN Z I BAlt; CITY, ISLAND, AND COAST. JA RICHARD BY F. BURTON. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. LONDON TINSLEY BROTHERS, 18, CATHERINE ST., STRAND. 1872. [AZZ Bights reserved.] JOHN CUILDS AND SON, PIiNTERS. I '/, CONTENTS OF VOL. Il. CHAPTER I. FROM ZANZIBAR TO MO.MBASAH PAGE .... 1 CHAPTER IL MOM NBASAH OR MVfTA .. 23 CHAPTER MI. VISIT TO THE KISULODI-NI MISSION HOUSE.. CHAPTER IV. THE PEOPLE OF MOMBASAH.-THE WANYIKA TRIBE CHAPTER V. FROM MOMBASAH TO THE PANGA-NI RIVER.. 75 104 CHAPTER VI. FROM PANGA-NI TOWN TO TONGWE OUTPOST.-THE BALOCH GUARD 139 CHAPTER VIL THE MARCH TO FUGA. -ASCENT OF THE HIGHLANDS OF EAST AFRICA.-PRESENTATION TO KING KIMWERE .. .. .iSS P/j' _ CONTENTS. CHAPTER VIII. THE MARCH BACK.-THE HIPPOPOTAMUS' HUNT.-THE EETURNTO ZANZIBAR .. .222 VISIT TO SA'ADANI, THE THE EAST AFRICAN EXP TO KILWA, THE END OF C,PTAIN SPEKE .. NOTES ON COMMERCIAL 1857-1S59 . CHAPTER IX. COPAL FIELD .. 260 CHAPTER X. EDITION OF 1857-1859 .. 283 CHAPTER XI. THE EAST AFRICAN EXPEDITION (1857-1859) 329 CHAPTER XII. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 371 APPENDIX I. MATTERSATZANZIBARINTHEYEARS....... .. .. 405 APPENDIX II. A. B. THERMOMETRIC OBSERVATIONS IN EAST AFRICA APPENDIX II. C. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS OBSERVATIONS DURING A COAST OF AFRICA . NOTES TO APPENDIX III. *. 426 * . 433 APPENDIX III. VOYAGE OF RESEARCH ON THE EAST 458 .. 514 ZANZIBAR. PART Il. -
World Heritage Watch Report 2017 World Heritage Watch Report 2017 Report Watch Heritage World
W H W World Heritage Watch Report 2017 World Heritage Watch Report 2017 Report Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch Heritage World World Heritage Watch World Heritage Watch Report 2017 Berlin 2017 2 Bibliographical Information World Heritage Watch: World Heritage Watch Report 2017. Berlin 2017 152 pages, with 102 photos and 45 graphics and maps Published by World Heritage Watch e.V. Berlin 2017 ISBN 978-3-00-056832-9 NE: World Heritage Watch 1. World Heritage 2. Civil Society 3. UNESCO 4. Participation 5. Natural Heritage 6. Cultural Heritage 7. Historic Cities 8. Sites 9. Monuments 10. Cultural Landscapes 11. Indigenous Peoples 12. Participation W H W © World Heritage Watch e.V. 2017 This work with all its parts is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the strict limits of the applicable copyright law without the consent of the publisher is inadmissable and punishable. This refers especially to reproduction of figures and/or text in print or xerography, translations, microforms and the data storage and processing in electronical systems. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opin- ions whatsoever on the part of the publishers concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the frontiers of any country or territory. The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of the editors, and do not commit them. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publishers except for the quotation of brief passages for the purposes of review.