DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective 2 World Heritage papers32 Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective The Western Indian Ocean Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective The Western Indian Ocean Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO 2012 All rights reserved ISBN 978-92-3-001072-0 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover photo: © Keith Ellenbogen Supervision and coordination: Fanny Douvere, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Agne Bartkute, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Authors: David Obura, CORDIO Julie Church, CORDIO Catherine Gabrié Denis Macharia, CORDIO (map assistance) Overall coordination: Fanny Douvere Coordination of the World Heritage Papers Series: Vesna Vujicic-Lugassy, UNESCO World Heritage Centre Graphic layout: Jean-Luc Thierry Prefered Reference: Obura, D.O., Church, J.E. and Gabrié, C. (2012). Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective: The Western Indian Ocean. World Heritage Centre, United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 124 pp. Website: http://www.vliz.be/projects/marineworldheritage This publication is made in consultation with IUCN. World Heritage Centre UNESCO 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel.: 33 (0)1 45 68 15 71 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 Website: http://whc.unesco.org This publication and the expert meeting was made possible thanks to the ongoing support to the World Heritage Marine Programme by the government of Flanders (Belgium) Additional support to this publication and the expert meeting was provided by the French Marine Protected Area Agency. The World Heritage Centre is grateful for the long-term support to its Marine Programme provided by the Tides of Time partners: 2 Preface This year is the 40th anniversary of the World Heritage Convention. The World Heritage Committee, the statutory body in charge of the protection of the 936 properties on the World Heritage List, has recognized that the List does not yet fully represent all types of cultural and natural heritage which are of Outstanding Universal Value. In 1994, the World Heritage Committee launched a Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible World Heritage List. The Strategy suggests avoiding an over-represen- tation of a small number of regions or categories and ensuring that the World Heritage List reflects the broad diversity of the world’s cultural and natural areas of OUV. An important contribution to the Global Strategy is the effort to encourage nomination of properties from categories and regions currently not or underrepresented on the World Heritage List. One hundred and eighty-nine nations are now “States Parties” to the World Heritage Convention and therefore eligible to submit nominations for sites, including marine areas, to be considered for World Heritage listing to the World Heritage Committee. First, each country makes an inventory of sites located within its boundaries for inclusion on the Tentative List of sites that a State Party may decide to submit for inscription in the next 5–10 years. The World Heritage Committee cannot consider a nomination for inscription on the World Heritage List unless the property has already been included on the State Party’s Tentative List. Contrary to the traditional country-by-country approach, marine World Heritage requires reflection of marine features at larger scales meaningful from an ecosystem perspective. Marine ecosystems almost always transcend national boundaries. In anticipation of increased interest globally in designating new marine World Heritage sites, this project was established to test a more scientific and robust approach to identify marine sites of poten- tial OUV. The project initiated a new approach in the Western Indian Ocean, an area largely under the jurisdiction of African countries and with unique and age-old geological processes currently under-represented on the World Heritage List. The recent expert workshop and this report examined potential areas of OUV in the Western Indian Ocean. The results will enable the States Parties, the World Heritage Committee, and the World Heritage Centre, to take actions to address the need for enhanced protection and sustainable management of marine ecosystems in the Western Indian Ocean. Kishore Rao Director UNESCO World Heritage Centre 3 Introduction Introduction Since about 70% of the world’s surface area is ocean, marine areas are generally under- represented in the World Heritage List. In 2005 the World Heritage Marine Programme was established in part with the aim of ensuring that marine sites with Outstanding Universal Value are inscribed on the World Heritage List and protected so future generations can continue to enjoy them. Following the 1994 Global Strategy, a major focus of the Marine Programme is to support States Parties with the identification of sites in all major marine regions and marine ecosystem types in a balanced, credible and representative manner. Marine ecosystems support much of the world’s goods and services and provide invalu- able economic benefits, yet less than five percent of sites on the World Heritage List are nominated for marine heritage values at this time. Recent reports on the state of marine ecosystems and their resources provide alarming indications on their condition. For example, coral reefs and associated mangrove forests and sea grass beds are severely threatened from a combination of human activities and natural influences, e.g. climate change. Urgent action is needed to revert the decline of these globally significant diverse and productive marine ecosystems. Forty-five marine sites have now been inscribed on the World Heritage List, covering about 1.5 million km2 of the ocean surface – an area about the size of the Gulf of Mexico. Each of these 45 sites represents exceptional features in the ocean that are recognized by the international community for their outstanding natural beauty, extraordinary biodiversity, or unique ecological, biological and geological processes. However, on a planet where more than 95% of all living space is located in the ocean, a huge amount of our heritage is still left undiscovered. The World Heritage Convention is an important tool to bring attention and protection for these unique marine ecosystems as they are a compelling illustration of major types of natural heritage not sufficiently represented on the World Heritage List. This report builds on previous efforts to navigate a long-term future for the World Heritage Marine Programme and to facilitate the process of replicating regional assessments in other marine ecoregions. To access this report visit this webiste: http://www.vliz.be/projects/marineworldheritage/. Dr. Fanny Douvere Coordinator Marine Programme UNESCO World Heritage Centre 5 Assessing Marine World Heritage from an Ecosystem Perspective: The Western Indian Ocean Acknowledgements This report builds on prior work under the World Heritage Marine programme, and parts of the text in the first part of this report have been derived directly from those reports, including the 1994 Global Strategy for a Representative, Balanced and Credible World Heritage List, the 2011 report Navigating the Future of Marine World Heritage, and the newly developed brochure on using Marine Ecoregions of the World as a basis for iden- tifying marine gaps on the World Heritage List, as well as from the World Heritage website and other official documents. We would like to acknowledge our use of unpub- lished datasets generously provided by the Indian Ocean Commission on behalf of the member countries of the Commission. We would like to thank Fanny Douvere and the staff at the World Heritage Centre, Diana Dumeril, Agne Bartkute, Rachida Kameche, for guidance and support in conducting this work. We would also like to thank the workshop hosts in la Reunion, Mrs Fabienne Couapel Sauret, Vice-Présidente of la Region Reunion, and Soudjata Radjassegarane, Laurence Provot and Anne Nicolas. The comments and feedback from the World Heritage Focal Points from countries of the Western Indian Ocean was helpful in scoping the document, and we thank Fareed Chuttan, Laure Dexcidieux, Solange Laura Macamo, Chumani Mangcu, E. Eliwasa Maro, G. James Njogu. Finally, for the experts who contributed their time in the workshop, and/or in providing or reviewing technical content of the report, we acknowledge Ameer Adbulla, Tim Andrews, Lionel Bigot, Philippe Bouchet, Jerome Bourjea, Salvatore Cerchio, Pascale Chabanet, Vic Cockroft, Gerard Collin, Bertrand Denis, Frauke Fleischer-Dogley, Hans Fricke, Nicole Gravier-Bonnet, Francisco (Tjess) Hernandez, Nigel Hussey, Jeremy Kiszka, Erwan Lagabrielle, Catherine Latreille, Mathieu Le Corre, Adriano Macia, Eric Marguerite, Carole Martinez, Jan Mees, Jeanne A. Mortimer, Mika Odido, Karine Pothin, Jean-Pascal Quod, Jerome Raimbault, Harifidy Ralison, Andriamia Ranjato, Sonia Ribes, Matt Richmond, Melita Samoilys, Francis Staub, Gisele Tarnus, Jean-François Ternon, Gwenaelle Thiery, Ross Wanless and Andrew Zaloumis. 6
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interactions of Patagonian Toothfish Fisheries With
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 17 (2010): 179–195 INTERACTIONS OF PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERIES WITH KILLER AND SPERM WHALES IN THE CROZET ISLANDS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEPREDATION LEVELS AND INSIGHTS ON POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES P. Tixier1, N. Gasco2, G. Duhamel2, M. Viviant1, M. Authier1 and C. Guinet1 1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé CNRS, UPR 1934 Villiers-en-Bois, 79360 France Email – [email protected] 2 MNHN Paris, 75005 France Abstract Within the Crozet Islands Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) longline fishery is exposed to high levels of depredation by killer (Orcinus orca) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). From 2003 to 2008, sperm whales alone, killer whales alone, and the two species co-occurring were observed on 32.6%, 18.6% and 23.4% respectively of the 4 289 hauled lines. It was estimated that a total of 571 tonnes (€4.8 million) of Patagonian toothfish were lost due to depredation by killer whales and both killer and sperm whales. Killer whales were found to be responsible for the largest part of this loss (>75%), while sperm whales had a lower impact (>25%). Photo-identification data revealed 35 killer whales belonging to four different pods were involved in 81.3% of the interactions. Significant variations of interaction rates with killer whales were detected between vessels suggesting the influence of operational factors on depredation. When killer whales were absent at the beginning of the line hauling process, short lines (<5 000 m) provided higher yield and were significantly less impacted by depredation than longer lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Citizenship Active Exchange Visitors in 2017
    Total Number of Active Exchange Visitors by Country of Citizenship in Calendar Year 2017 Active Exchange Visitors Country of Citizenship in 2017 AFGHANISTAN 418 ALBANIA 460 ALGERIA 316 ANDORRA 16 ANGOLA 70 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 29 ARGENTINA 8,428 ARMENIA 325 ARUBA 1 ASHMORE AND CARTIER ISLANDS 1 AUSTRALIA 7,133 AUSTRIA 3,278 AZERBAIJAN 434 BAHAMAS, THE 87 BAHRAIN 135 BANGLADESH 514 BARBADOS 58 BASSAS DA INDIA 1 BELARUS 776 BELGIUM 1,938 BELIZE 55 BENIN 61 BERMUDA 14 BHUTAN 63 BOLIVIA 535 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 728 BOTSWANA 158 BRAZIL 19,231 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS 3 BRUNEI 44 BULGARIA 4,996 BURKINA FASO 79 BURMA 348 BURUNDI 32 CAMBODIA 258 CAMEROON 263 CANADA 9,638 CAPE VERDE 16 CAYMAN ISLANDS 1 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 27 CHAD 32 Total Number of Active Exchange Visitors by Country of Citizenship in Calendar Year 2017 CHILE 3,284 CHINA 70,240 CHRISTMAS ISLAND 2 CLIPPERTON ISLAND 1 COCOS (KEELING) ISLANDS 3 COLOMBIA 9,749 COMOROS 7 CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE) 37 CONGO (KINSHASA) 95 COSTA RICA 1,424 COTE D'IVOIRE 142 CROATIA 1,119 CUBA 140 CYPRUS 175 CZECH REPUBLIC 4,048 DENMARK 3,707 DJIBOUTI 28 DOMINICA 23 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 4,170 ECUADOR 2,803 EGYPT 2,593 EL SALVADOR 463 EQUATORIAL GUINEA 9 ERITREA 10 ESTONIA 601 ETHIOPIA 395 FIJI 88 FINLAND 1,814 FRANCE 21,242 FRENCH GUIANA 1 FRENCH POLYNESIA 25 GABON 19 GAMBIA, THE 32 GAZA STRIP 104 GEORGIA 555 GERMANY 32,636 GHANA 686 GIBRALTAR 25 GREECE 1,295 GREENLAND 1 GRENADA 60 GUATEMALA 361 GUINEA 40 Total Number of Active Exchange Visitors by Country of Citizenship in Calendar Year 2017 GUINEA‐BISSAU
    [Show full text]
  • Global Scores the Ocean Health Index Team Table of Contents
    2015 GLOBAL SCORES THE OCEAN HEALTH INDEX TEAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Conservation International Introduction to Ocean Health Index ............................................................................................................. 1 Results for 2015 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Country & Territory Scores ........................................................................................................................... 9 Appreciations ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Citation ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 UC Santa Barbara, National Center for Ecological Analysis & Synthesis INTRODUCTION TO THE OCEAN HEALTH INDEX Important note: Scores in this report differ from scores originally posted on the Ocean Health Index website, www.oceanhealthindex.org and shown in previous reports. Each year the Index improves methods and data where possible. Some improvements change scores and rankings. When such changes occur, all earlier scores are recalculated using the new methods so that any differences in scores between years is due to changes in the conditions evaluated, not to changes in methods. This permits year-to-year comparison between all global-level Index results. Only the scores most recently
    [Show full text]
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • The RV Dr Fridtjof Nansen in the Western Indian Ocean: Voyages of Marine Research and Capacity Development 3.1 Study Area
    Chapter 3 Study area, vessels and surveys Bernadine Everett “Survey objectives ranged from fish biomass estimation, to sampling oceanographic processes and whole ecosystems.” Abstract For the purpose of this study, the Western Indian Ocean was divided into six subregions, based on a combination of known marine ecoregions, geopolitical boundaries, and the spatial coverage by past RV Dr Fridtjof Nansen surveys. The Somali Coast, East Africa Coastal Current subregion (including Kenya and Tanzania), Mozambique, Madagascar and Comoros, Mascarene and Seamounts subregions extended 200 nautical miles seawards from the coast. The first Nansen (active between 1975 and 1993) surveyed in the Western Indian Ocean between 1975 and 1990, where after there was a 17 year gap before the second Nansen (active between 1994 and 2016) returned to the region in 2007. Survey objectives ranged from fish biomass estimation, to sampling oceanographic processes and whole ecosystems. The Mozambique subregion was surveyed most frequently (14 times) and over the broadest time period (1977–1990 and 2007–2014). Other subregions were surveyed only once, or a few times over four decades, thus providing point estimates, but not time-series information. Chapter 3 is intended as a reference chapter, showing the locations of all sampling stations attended by the Nansen between 1975 and 2014, and their grouping into six geographic subregions for comparative purposes in the following chapters. Previous page: Pelagic and demersal trawl nets on the RV Dr Fridtjof Nansen. © Bernadine Everett Opposite page: Disclaimer – The designation employed and the presentation of material in the maps are for illustration only and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the authors concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimination of frontiers and boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Presentation Here
    Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Jean-Philippe Palasi Director for European policy Averting global biodiversity loss Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Can we avert global biodiversity loss ? That means addressing 5 direct causes: • Habitat destruction • Over exploitation • Pollution • Invasive species • Climate change And several root causes: • Demographic growth • Poverty • Poor governance, corruption and conflicts • Unsustainable economic models (production, Photo 1 consumption and supply chains) 4.2” x 10.31” • Lack of awareness & adequate accounting Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Habitat destruction Climate change species confined to high altitude At 520 ppm (mid-century?) most of coral species in warm waters would scarcely support further growth. Increased droughts in the Amazon basin 2010 vegetation anomalies, Nasa Earth Observatory CC impact on species Chris Thomas (Leeds univ), Nature, 2004 « We predict, on the basis of mid-range climate-warming scenarios for 2050, that 15-37% of species (…) will be committed to exctinction » = 1 million terrestrial species by 2050 Mitigation is key: - Lower climate projections: ~18% - Mid-range: ~24% Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” - Maximum: ~35% Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Biodiversity loss …is a defining issues of our time …is closely linked to climate change …will carry on for decades, probably centuries …can be mitigated through profound changes in our economic and social systems Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” EU action for global biodiversity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Wide Seasonal Evolution of the Indian Ocean's Phytoplankton Blooms
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, C12014, doi:10.1029/2007JC004090, 2007 Click Here for Full Article Basin-wide seasonal evolution of the Indian Ocean’s phytoplankton blooms M. Le´vy,1,2 D. Shankar,2 J.-M. Andre´,1,2 S. S. C. Shenoi,2 F. Durand,2,3 and C. de Boyer Monte´gut4 Received 5 January 2007; revised 2 August 2007; accepted 5 September 2007; published 21 December 2007. [1] A climatology of Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) chlorophyll data over the Indian Ocean is used to examine the bloom variability patterns, identifying spatio-temporal contrasts in bloom appearance and intensity and relating them to the variability of the physical environment. The near-surface ocean dynamics is assessed using an ocean general circulation model (OGCM). It is found that over a large part of the basin, the seasonal cycle of phytoplankton is characterized by two consecutive blooms, one during the summer monsoon, and the other during the winter monsoon. Each bloom is described by means of two parameters, the timing of the bloom onset and the cumulated increase in chlorophyll during the bloom. This yields a regional image of the influence of the two monsoons on phytoplankton, with distinct regions emerging in summer and in winter. By comparing the bloom patterns with dynamical features derived from the OGCM (horizontal and vertical velocities and mixed-layer depth), it is shown that the regional structure of the blooms is intimately linked with the horizontal and vertical circulations forced by the monsoons. Moreover, this comparison permits the assessment of some of the physical mechanisms that drive the bloom patterns, and points out the regions where these mechanisms need to be further investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Biology of Tortoises
    The Conservation Biology of Tortoises Edited by Ian R. Swingland and Michael W. Klemens IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group and The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 5 IUCN—The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC 3. To cooperate with the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the in developing and evaluating a data base on the status of and trade in wild scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biological flora and fauna, and to provide policy guidance to WCMC. diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species of 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their con- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna servation, and for the management of other species of conservation concern. and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, sub- vation of species or biological diversity. species, and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintain- 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: ing biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and vulnerable species. • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of biological diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conserva- tion Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitor- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Symposium Programme
    11TH SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN MARINE SCIENCE ASSOCIATION SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM 1st – 6th July 2019 University of Mauritius, Reduit SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME Photo credit: ????? 11TH SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN MARINE SCIENCE ASSOCIATION SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM 1st – 6th July 2019 University of Mauritius, Reduit SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME SPONSORS:: All photo credits: UoM Design by: Gordon Arara 11th WIOMSA Scientific Symposium ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SPONSORS ............................................................................................................................ii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................2 SYMPOSIUM ROOM PLAN ...................................................................................................5 EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SYMPOSIUM ..................................................................7 SPECIAL SESSIONS ...............................................................................................................8 OUTLINE OF ELEVENTH WIOMSA SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME ...................9 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME ................................................................................................. 11 ORAL PRESENTATIONS ..................................................................................................... 11 POSTERS ............................................................................................................................. 29 11th WIOMSA
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Education
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Implementation Date: DOE INFORMATION DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS Fiscal Year 1995-96 VOLUME II: AUTOMATED STAFF INFORMATION SYSTEM July 1, 1995 AUTOMATED STAFF DATA ELEMENTS APPENDIX C COUNTRY CODES CODE COUNTRY CODE COUNTRY AF Afghanistan CV Cape Verde AB Albania CJ Cayman Islands AG Algeria CP Central African Republic AN Andorra CD Chad AO Angola CI Chile AV Anguilla CH China AY Antarctica KI Christmas Island AC Antigua and Barbuda CN Clipperton Island AX Antilles KG Cocos Islands (Keeling) AE Argentina CL Colombia AD Armenia CQ Comoros AA Aruba CF Congo AS Australia CR Coral Sea Island AU Austria CS Costa Rica AJ Azerbaijan DF Croatia AI Azores Islands, Portugal CU Cuba BF Bahamas DH Curacao Island BA Bahrain CY Cyprus BS Baltic States CX Czechoslovakia BG Bangladesh DT Czech Republic BB Barbados DK Democratic Kampuchea BI Bassas Da India DA Denmark BE Belgium DJ Djibouti BZ Belize DO Dominica BN Benin DR Dominican Republic BD Bermuda EJ East Timor BH Bhutan EC Ecuador BL Bolivia EG Egypt BJ Bonaire Island ES El Salvador BP Bosnia and Herzegovina EN England BC Botswana EA Equatorial Africa BV Bouvet Island EQ Equatorial Guinea BR Brazil ER Eritrea BT British Virgin Islands EE Estonia BW British West Indies ET Ethiopia BQ Brunei Darussalam EU Europa Island BU Bulgaria FA Falkland Islands (Malvinas) BX Burkina Faso, West Africa FO Faroe Islands BM Burma FJ Fiji BY Burundi FI Finland JB Byelorussia SSR FR France CB Cambodia FM France, Metropolitian CM Cameroon FN French Guiana CC Canada FP French Polynesia Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/RW/EBSA/SIO/1/4 26 June 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Flic en Flac, Mauritius, 31 July to 3 August 2012 REPORT OF THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS1 INTRODUCTION 1. In paragraph 36 of decision X/29, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 10) requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), with regard to fisheries management, to organize, including the setting of terms of reference, a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) through the application of scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20, and other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20. 2. In the same decision (paragraph 41), the Conference of the Parties requested that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data and information and results collated through the workshops referred to above to participating Parties, other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Resilience Assessment of the Pemba Channel Conservation Area, Tanzania
    Coral Reef Resilience Assessment of the Pemba Channel Conservation Area, Tanzania G. Grimsditch, J. Tamelander, J. Mwaura, M. Zavagli, Y. Takata, T. Gomez Published August 2009 from Survey in Febuary 2009 IUCN CLIMATE CHANGE AND CORAL REEFS WORKING GROUP I The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, CCCR, CORDIO, Pemba Alive, RAMSAR, or the Manta Resort concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, CCCR, CORDIO, Pemba Alive, RAMSAR, or the Manta Resort. We would like to thank the MacArthur Foundation and the Manta Resort for their generous support which made this study possible. We would also like to thank Ali Said, Pemba Channel Conservation Area (PeCCA), and Zahor Mohamed, Marine Conservation Unit, for enabling and assisting with this research. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2009 IUCN/CORDIO Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Grimsditch G., Tamelander J., Mwaura J., Zavagli M., Takata Y., Gomez T.
    [Show full text]