Control of Invasive Carp Using Non-Physical Barriers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control of Invasive Carp Using Non-Physical Barriers Control Of Invasive Carp Using Non-Physical Barriers Kaveh Someah, General Manager-Ovivo USA,LLC [email protected] 801-931 3010 Invasive Asian Carp Invasive Carp Issues Common carp European origin: invasive species in US Voracious bottom feeders- destroy aquatic habitat Affects wildfowling Grow large quickly Prolific spawners Spread rampantly throughout interconnected watercourses Probably the most damaging Common carp, Cyprinus carpio invasive fish [Sorensen & co-workers, University of Minnesota] Control Strategies • Various strategies can be considered: fish removal, rotenone, fish isolation • Isolation methods depend on identifying critical migration corridors, key times of migration, then blocking fish movements with physical or behavioural barriers • Need to consider fish population dynamics (what number of fish passing would be critical?) [Sorensen & co-workers, University of Minnesota] Basis for Multi-Stimulus Barriers • No behavioural barrier of any type is 100% effective for relevant species and lifestages • Animal behaviour is invariably a multiplex response to a complex of different signals in the environment, so why stick to one stimulus? • Different stimuli can interact to great effect to create a synergistic response • A complex of signals is less likely to be affected by an environmental perturbation (e.g. passing barge) Available Alternatives Are • Physical Barriers • Non-Physical Barriers Advantage of Non Physical Over Physical Barriers Non Physical Barriers have the following potential benefits: • No blockage risk/ flow impedance • In some cases can be species-selective • No barrier to navigation Non-Physical Fish Deterrent Technologies • Air Bubble Curtain Barriers • Electric Barriers • High Intensity Light Barriers • Acoustic Barriers (Sound Projector Arrays –SPAs, Bio- Acoustic Fish Fence –BAFF) • Combination of above Fish Deterrent Technologies (FDT) • Large Scale FDTs has well been established for fish exclusion from power plant and other water intakes. • Full Scale FDTs in CA is used to divert down migrating chinook salmon from entering irrigation diversions. • So far, only electric barriers used for invasive species control (Chicago Canal) • This presentation discusses use of multiple technologies to improve barrier effectiveness Electric Barriers • Efficiency related to potential difference across fish (high PD, higher efficiency) • Voltage gradients high enough to stop juvenile fish may be unacceptable for human Health & Safety • Electric fields are distorted e.g. by steel-hulled barges passing over electrodes • Generally not selective for species (native fish movements will also be blocked) Smith Root Graduated Field Barrier Why Use Sound? • Asian carp are extremely sensitive to sound • Failure modes are different from electric barriers, e.g. effective with small fish, so complementary in effect • Sound barrier-field will not be disrupted by barge traffic Sound Sensitivity Classes High Sensitivity: ‘hearing specialists’: clupeids, carp family, catfish etc. Moderate sensitivity: most roundfish e.g. cod Low sensitivity: bottom fish and those without swimbladder Fish Sensitivity to Sound: ABR Measurement Auditory Brainstem Response Tests can be carried out to determine optimum signal frequencies Data can be used to design species- selective barriers ABR tests carried out for Bighead and Silver Carp at Havana Lab Audiograms: Asian carp vs. other fish Audiograms are quickly Goldfish measured using Acoustic Asian carp Brainstem Response (ABR) technique Asian carp show exceptionally high sensitivity and extended Extended high-frequency response Common AFD Frequency Signal Range for to 2 kHz Frequencies Asian carp Possible to configure species selective barriers in some cases Effect of Sound on Smaller Fish Whereas electric barrier performance is better for large fish, acoustic deflection works on fish of all sizes Swimbladder acts as a detuned receiver, (i.e. it is not resonant), so that hearing sensitivity is not a function of fish size (Hawkins, 1981) Limiting factor for small fish is normally swimming performance (ability to resist passive movement with current) The Bio-Acoustic Fish Fence(BAFF): How it Works “Sound trapped within a wall of Air Bubbles” The “BAFF” A pneumatic system that introduces sound into a bubble curtain Sound concentrated in bubble plume Produces a ‘wall of sound’, suitable for guiding rather than deflecting fish Acoustic Barriers Sound projector or BAFF Efficiency retained over a broad sizeFGS Sound Projector range of fish No human Health & Safety issues Sound field integrity is maintained during passage of shipping Barriers can allow selective passage of native species (depending on difference in hearing ability) Bio-Acoustic Fish Fence (BAFF): Sound trapped within a wall of bubbles BAFF – Basic Arrangement • Sound projectors at base of bubble curtain aligned to ‘couple’ sound • Speed of sound in plume is Air intermediate between that curtain of air and water • Sound is refracted into bubble curtain and is Sound contained, creating a “wall projector of sound” Deterrent Sound Signals Various sound signals have been developed. These are typically in the frequency range <3 kHz and are continuously changing. For resident fish populations, the signal can be changed at intervals to avoid habituation. Signal Development: Effect of Different Signal Types Pure tones Not effective Pulses Not effective Chirps Are Effective The Acoustic Field The effectiveness of a sound field depends on - background noise - sound propagation - reflectiveness - source interactions This can be evaluated by available acoustic model. This also ensures no unwanted ‘sound pollution’ PrISM Acoustic Model BAFF Principle 1: Sound Resonates Between Bed and Surface Resonance path ensures uniform vertical spread of sound, rather than inverse square law decay Allows the BAFF to maintain full-height wall of sound in deep water BAFF Principle 2: Sound is Trapped within Bubble Sheet Sound level drops by up to 60dB at 1m distance, creating a well-defined guidance line Decay of Sound Pressure from BAFF Centre 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 Sound 1uPa) (dBLevel re Pressure 90 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Distance from centreline (m) “Leaky” BAFF Concept – to Stop Fish Jumping Extra sound projectors are added but not coupled to bubble curtain Protective “wall-of-sound” is maintained but a more diffuse sound gradient is created upstream and downstream of the barrier This reduces the shock of the sound stimulus and will allow fish to turn back earlier Intended to reduce risk of fish jumping barrier Adding Other Stimuli Combinations of Bubbles, Sound, High Intensity Lights and Electric Fields Basis for Multi-Stimulus Barriers No behavioural barrier of any type has been found to be 100% efficient for all species and lifestages (e.g. electric barriers less efficient for small fish) Animal behaviour is a response to a complex of different signals in the environment, so why stick to one stimulus? Different stimuli can interact to create a synergistic response A complex of signals is likely to be less affected by an environmental perturbation (e.g. passing barge) High Intensity Light Barriers Efficiency retained over a FGS Linear Low- broad size range of fish Voltage Strobe Illumination is maintained during passage of shipping Usually set to between 200 and 400 fps Adding High Intensity Light to a BAFF High Intensity Light are repellent to many fish Narrow-beam lights fitted at base of bubble plume Water more transparent in bubble sheet, allowing light to reach surface even in turbid water (In reality the lighting forms a continuous line along the barrier) MkIII SPA Systems MkIII Sound Projector Integral High Intensity Light ring Contains sound generation and monitoring electronics Designed for easy maintenance MkIII SPA Systems For GS Power Supply & Performance Monitoring Unit Total System Control Unit (microprocessor) Touch sensitive screen for operators Power Supply Units (1 per 12 Sound Projectors) MkIII SPA System Schematic Fish Diversion Concepts Developing a clear fish behavior plan : Are we blocking, or diverting or trapping and removing the fish? What path will they take? How fast will they need to swim and for how long? What are the hydraulics What other factors might intervene (e.g. flooding, disturbance of stimulus field)? Fish Diversion Concepts Invasive Species Barrier: Blockage Barrier placed across the channel to deter fish movement Opportunities for selectively deterring Stream approach velocity acoustically sensitive species (acoustic only) Success depends on strength of stimulus vs. motivational state of fish Approach velocities must not exceed Escape horizon fish swimming ability (assume 90th%ile sustainable speed) StreamlinesFish Fish Diversion Concepts Angled FDT barrier for invasive species deflection Angled barrier line produces guidance effect Fish are diverted towards one end of the barrier, reducing likelihood of Navigation lock penetration Escape horizon Streamlines Fish Fish Diversion Concepts Angled barrier for invasive species trapping Similar to angled barrier above Fish are diverted into a trap Fish trap with inscale and are Navigation lock periodically collected and Escape horizon destroyed Streamlines Fish Bypass Hemsjo Nedre, Line of Bio-Acoustic Fish Fence Angled Barrier (BAFF) Bypass & Trap ‘Pavlovian’ Conditioning Raceway trials have demonstrated that Asian carp learn to stay away from sound This indicates that sound could be used in conjunction with existing electrical barriers to
Recommended publications
  • Clean &Unclean Meats
    Clean & Unclean Meats God expects all who desire to have a relationship with Him to live holy lives (Exodus 19:6; 1 Peter 1:15). The Bible says following God’s instructions regarding the meat we eat is one aspect of living a holy life (Leviticus 11:44-47). Modern research indicates that there are health benets to eating only the meat of animals approved by God and avoiding those He labels as unclean. Here is a summation of the clean (acceptable to eat) and unclean (not acceptable to eat) animals found in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. For further explanation, see the LifeHopeandTruth.com article “Clean and Unclean Animals.” BIRDS CLEAN (Eggs of these birds are also clean) Chicken Prairie chicken Dove Ptarmigan Duck Quail Goose Sage grouse (sagehen) Grouse Sparrow (and all other Guinea fowl songbirds; but not those of Partridge the corvid family) Peafowl (peacock) Swan (the KJV translation of “swan” is a mistranslation) Pheasant Teal Pigeon Turkey BIRDS UNCLEAN Leviticus 11:13-19 (Eggs of these birds are also unclean) All birds of prey Cormorant (raptors) including: Crane Buzzard Crow (and all Condor other corvids) Eagle Cuckoo Ostrich Falcon Egret Parrot Kite Flamingo Pelican Hawk Glede Penguin Osprey Grosbeak Plover Owl Gull Raven Vulture Heron Roadrunner Lapwing Stork Other birds including: Loon Swallow Albatross Magpie Swi Bat Martin Water hen Bittern Ossifrage Woodpecker ANIMALS CLEAN Leviticus 11:3; Deuteronomy 14:4-6 (Milk from these animals is also clean) Addax Hart Antelope Hartebeest Beef (meat of domestic cattle) Hirola chews
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Fish Price Report Issue 2/2020 Issue 2/2020 Chinese Fish Price Report
    Chinese Fish Price Report Issue 2/2020 Issue 2/2020 Chinese Fish Price Report The Chinese Fish Price Report Editorial Board Editor in Chief Audun Lem Marcio Castro de Souza John Ryder Marcio Castro de Souza Contributing Editors Coordinator Maria Catalano Weiwei Wang Helga Josupeit William Griffin Contributing Partner Graphic Designer China Aquatic Products Processing and Alessia Capasso Marketing Alliance (CAPPMA) EDITORIAL OFFICE GLOBEFISH Products, Trade and Marketing Branch (NFIM) Fisheries Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy Tel. +39 06 5705 57227 E-mail: [email protected] www.globefish.org REGIONAL OFFICES Latin America, Caribbean Africa Arab Countries INFOPESCA, Casilla de Correo 7086, INFOPÊCHE, BP 1747 Abidjan 01, INFOSAMAK, 71, Boulevard Rahal, Julio Herrea y Obes 1296, 11200 Côte d’Ivoire El Meskini Casablanda 20 000, Morocco Montevideo, Uruguay Tel: (225) 20 21 31 98/20 21 57 75 Tel: (212) 522540856 Tel: (598) 2 9028701/29028702 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (212) 522540855 Fax: (598) 2 9030501 [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.infopeche.ci [email protected] Website: www.infopesca.org Website: www.infosamak.org Europe Asia China Eurofish, H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46, INFOFISH INFOYU, Room 901, No 18, Maizidian street, 1553 Copenhagen V, Denmark 1st Floor, Wisma LKIM Jalan Desaria Chaoyang District, Beijing 100125, China Tel: (+45) 333777dd Pulau Meranti, 47120 Puchong, Selangor DE
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Consumer Acceptance of Canned Bighead Carp: a Structural Model Analysis CAROLE R
    Marine Resource Economics. Volume 10. pp. 101-116 073&.136OW5 S3.M * ,00 Primed in ihe USA. All nghls reserved. Copyright O 1995 Marine Resources Foundation Potential Consumer Acceptance of Canned Bighead Carp: A Structural Model Analysis CAROLE R. ENGLE PIERRE-JUSTIN KOUKA Aquaculture/Fisheries Center University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff 1200 N. University Drive Pine Bluff, AR 71601 Abstract The effects of socio-demographic factors on consumer ratings of product attributes of an experimental canned bighead product were analyzed. OLS techniques were used to evaluate the effects of experience consuming other canned fish products, race, gender, age, and income on the taste, tex- ture, appearance, and aroma of canned bighead. A logit analysis was then used to measure the effects of these variables on binary choice variables related to preference comparisons and willingness-to-pay as much for canned bighead as for canned salmon and canned tuna. Responses between the com- parisons of canned bighead and canned salmon or canned tuna varied. In- come, region, and gender significantly affected ratings on product attributes while taste variables significantly affected consumers' willingness-to-pay as much for canned bighead as for canned tuna. Conditional probabilities showed more clearly the effects of age, income, and gender on taste ratings, the subsequent effects of taste on preferences, and ultimately on willingness-to- pay. Probabilities estimated showed that canned bighead competes more fa- vorably with canned tuna than with canned salmon. Keywords consumer preferences, structural model analysis, logit. marketing, aquaculture Introduction Bighead carp (Hypophthalmicthys nobilis) have been raised in Arkansas in poly- culture with catfish in commercial fish ponds in an attempt to improve water quality since the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fish Suppliers
    2021 Fish Suppliers A.B. Jones Fish Hatchery Largemouth bass, hybrid bluegill, bluegill, black crappie, triploid grass carp, Nancy Jones gambusia – mosquito fish, channel catfish, bullfrog tadpoles, shiners 1057 Hwy 26 Williamsburg, KY 40769 (606) 549-2669 ATAC, LLC Pond Management Specialist Fathead minnows, golden shiner, goldfish, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, Rick Rogers hybrid bluegill, bluegill, redear sunfish, walleye, channel catfish, rainbow trout, PO Box 1223 black crappie, triploid grass carp, common carp, hybrid striped bass, koi, Lebanon, OH 45036 shubunkin goldfish, bullfrog tadpoles, and paddlefish (513) 932-6529 Anglers Bait-n-Tackle LLC Fathead minnows, rosey red minnows, bluegill, hybrid bluegill, goldfish and Kaleb Rodebaugh golden shiners 747 North Arnold Ave Prestonsburg, KY 606-886-1335 Andry’s Fish Farm Bluegill, hybrid bluegill, largemouth bass, koi, channel catfish, white catfish, Lyle Andry redear sunfish, black crappie, tilapia – human consumption only, triploid grass 10923 E. Conservation Club Road carp, fathead minnows and golden shiners Birdseye, IN 47513 (812) 389-2448 Arkansas Pondstockers, Inc Channel catfish, bluegill, hybrid bluegill, redear sunfish, largemouth bass, Michael Denton black crappie, fathead minnows, and triploid grass carp PO Box 357 Harrisbug, AR 75432 (870) 578-9773 Aquatic Control, Inc. Largemouth bass, bluegill, channel catfish, triploid grass carp, fathead Clinton Charlton minnows, redear sunfish, golden shiner, rainbow trout, and hybrid striped bass 505 Assembly Drive, STE 108
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Eat the Fish I Catch?
    EPA 823-F-14-002 For More Information October 2014 Introduction What can I do to reduce my health risks from eating fish containing chemical For more information about reducing your Fish are an important part of a healthy diet. pollutants? health risks from eating fish that contain chemi- Office of Science and Technology (4305T) They are a lean, low-calorie source of protein. cal pollutants, contact your local or state health Some sport fish caught in the nation’s lakes, Following these steps can reduce your health or environmental protection department. You rivers, oceans, and estuaries, however, may risks from eating fish containing chemical can find links to state fish advisory programs Should I Eat the contain chemicals that could pose health risks if pollutants. The rest of the brochure explains and your state’s fish advisory program contact these fish are eaten in large amounts. these recommendations in more detail. on the National Fish Advisory Program website Fish I Catch? at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fish- The purpose of this brochure is not to 1. Look for warning signs or call your shellfish/fishadvisories/index.cfm. discourage you from eating fish. It is intended local or state environmental health as a guide to help you select and prepare fish department. Contact them before you You may also contact: that are low in chemical pollutants. By following fish to see if any advisories are posted in these recommendations, you and your family areas where you want to fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can continue to enjoy the benefits of eating fish.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Diet Analysis of Common Carp and Channel Catfish by Brent Campos
    A Brief Diet Analysis of Common Carp and Channel Catfish By Brent Campos Four mainstem nonnative fish, two channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and two common carp (Cyprinus carpio), were captured using hook-and-line during our research expedition down the Grand Canyon in March, 2005. The stomachs of the fish were removed and their contents analyzed. The two species of fish appeared to exhibit divergent methods of feeding, despite having very similar organisms in their stomachs. Catfish displayed a selective, possibly mid-water picking strategy, while carp appeared to be consuming benthic substrates with their prey. Figure 1. The 405 mm common carp with its abdominal cavity cut open. Note the large ovaries, which are yellow and grainy in appearance (photo: Chris Hammersmark). One common carp was caught near sunset in a small eddy near Bass Camp at river mile 108 on March 21. It was male, measured 370 mm standard length (SL) and exhibited spawning colors. Identifiable stomach contents included aquatic Coeloptra (beetles), one oligochete, many pebbles, and detritus, among other benthic inverts. The presence of numerous pebbles indicates this fish was probing substrates for food, as would be expected for this species. The second common carp was caught near the mouth of the backwater at river mile 137, which was at the separation point of the eddy that created the site’s sandbar. The carp was female, 405 mm in length (standard length), and displayed spawning colors. Her ovaries made up approximately 50% of her abdominal cavity by volume. Gut contents were comprised of 95% algae and 5% a mix of detritus and aquatic invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for and Eating Carp in Utah by Dan Potts
    Fishing for and Eating Carp in Utah by Dan Potts History and International Importance Common (Eurasian) Carp, Cyprinus carpio, is native to Europe and Asia, one of a variety of ecologically different “Eurasian” carp species including silver, bighead, and black. Largely because of their fast growth and large size and their ability to live almost anywhere in temperate and tropical areas they have been introduced virtually everywhere in world primarily as a food fish. Over the centuries that species has become the number one freshwater fish grown for human consumption, by far! They are relatively easy to grow and harvest and make great table fare if they live in unpolluted waters. Mostly due the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad they were introduced to Utah in the late 1800s as both a food and sport fish and, have proliferated here ever since. Unfortunately, almost everything our parents and friends have told most us about common carp as we have grown up here in America is untrue! Me and Carp I have a lifelong history with carp. They were the first fish I pursued as a kid, riding my bicycle all over the Salt Lake Valley to find them and other fishes. Because my grandfather had helped to start the first duck club (The Utah Duck Club) in Utah, I would bike all the way out to the Great Salt Lake marshes to fish there for 10 to 20- pound trophy carp. My knowledge about the ecology and behavior of species grew as I learned how to hook and land these huge fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Webs and Fisheries
    Food Webs and Fisheries OCN 201 Biology Lecture 10 Steward Food Chain A series of different species of organisms at different trophic levels in an arrangement such that each species feeds only on organisms one trophic level below and serves as food only for the next level above. Trophic Levels Primary Primary Secondary Tertiary Producer Consumer Consumer Consumer Trophic Efficiency • Much of the biomass consumed by an organism is respired (released as CO2 and heat) or released as waste products • Typically only 10% is used to make biomass • This results in the trophic pyramid (or biomass pyramid) Trophic Pyramid 1 kg Top Consumer 10 kg Med. Fish 100 kg Sm. Fish Zoo- 1,000 kg plankton 10,000 kg Phyto- plankton Food Web The complex feeding arrangements among all the organisms in a community that takes into account that any organisms may feed on more than one species of prey and on more than one trophic level. Simplified Marine Food Web Biomass Pyramid Trophic Cascades • There are may interdependent connections in the marine food web! • Disturbance of one component of a food web can have unexpected consequences at many other levels North Pacific Whale Catch Trophic Cascade Whaling Moratorium Springer et al 2003 PNAS Healthy Kelp Forest Urchin Barrens Ocean Fisheries Food from the Sea • Seaweed • Invertebrates • Fish • Whales Commercial whaling ceased in 1987 (IWC moratorium) ! Resumed by Norway in 1993, Japan never stopped: Minke whales taken for ”scientific purposes”; meat and blubber sold to market. In 2000, extended to blue and Bryde’s whales
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Carp Could Help Us Solve Hunger Problem Michael (Dung) Tran Southern Methodist University, [email protected]
    Southern Methodist University SMU Scholar Collection of Engaged Learning Engaged Learning 5-2013 Asian Carp Could Help Us Solve Hunger Problem Michael (Dung) Tran Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/upjournal_research Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Tran, Michael (Dung), "Asian Carp Could Help Us Solve Hunger Problem" (2013). Collection of Engaged Learning. 24. https://scholar.smu.edu/upjournal_research/24 This document is brought to you for free and open access by the Engaged Learning at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collection of Engaged Learning by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Asian Carp Could Help Us Solve Hunger Problem Author: Michael Tran Overview Bighead carp and silver carp (Invader Species – Asian Carp) invaded the Illinois River waterway over a decade ago. Populations of these fishes have apparently grown dense in the lower and middle Illinois Rivers and both species are approaching the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) and potentially making their way into Great Lakes. So far, positive DNA of Asian Carp has been found beyond the defensive electrical barrier, which means they have made their way to Great Lakes somehow. Asian Carp are fast growing, aggressive, and adaptable fish that are outcompeting native fish species for food and habitat in much of the mid-section of the United States. Asian Carp were imported into the U.S. in the 1970s to filter pond water in fish farms in Arkansas. Flooding allowed them to escape and establish reproducing populations in the wild by the early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Species Groups in Global Aquaculture 2017
    Top 10 species groups in global aquaculture 2017 Written by Junning Cai,a Xiaowei Zhou,a Xue Yan,b Daniela Lucentea and Camilla Laganaa a Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) b Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CAFS) reduce to 10,5pt so until note in p.2 Highlights (2017) Freshwater fishes – Carps, barbels and other cyprinids: #1 species group, accounting for a quarter of global aquaculture production quantity (112 million tonnes) and value (USD 250 billion) in 2017; including 38 ASFIS species items farmed in 92 countries (or territories); four carp species (grass carp, silver carp, common carp and bighead carp) are among the top 10 ASFIS species items by quantity and/or value. – Tilapias and other cichlids: 5.25 percent (#4) of world aquaculture by quantity and 4.42 percent (#4) by value; the most popular species group farmed in 127 countries; Nile tilapia is the #9 ASFIS species item by quantity and #8 by value. – Catfishes: 4.93 percent (#7) of world aquaculture by quantity and 4.24 percent (#5) by value; including 27 ASFIS species items farmed in 86 countries. – Freshwater perch-like fishes: 2.85 percent (#9) of world aquaculture by value; a high-value group, including nine ASFIS species items farmed in 30 countries. – Freshwater fishes nei: 2.19 percent (#10) of world aquaculture by quantity; including miscellaneous WAPI FACTSHEET WAPI freshwater fishes farmed in 65 countries. Diadromous fishes – Salmons, trouts, smelts: 3.11 percent (#9) of world aquaculture by quantity and 8.94 percent (#3) by value; a high-value group, including 20 ASFIS species items farmed in 83 countries; Atlantic salmon is the #2 ASFIS species item by value.
    [Show full text]
  • Carp Fishing
    For more information on carp and carp fishing, visit these sections of our website: CARP Bait recipes: www.tpwd.texas.gov/fishboat/fish/ FISHING didyouknow/inland/carp_baits.phtml in Texas How to cook a carp: www.tpwd.texas.gov/fishboat/fish/ didyouknow/inland/carp_recipes.phtml Fishing regulations: www.tpwd.texas.gov/regulations/ Carp outdoor-annual The state’s first fish hatchery was a Fishing in carp production facility at Barton Texas Springs in Austin. Carp fishing and carp tournaments are By Mukhtar Farooqi getting attention in Texas. Lady Bird Lake (formerly Town Lake), located on the Colorado River in the heart of the he common carp (Cyprinus capital city, is gaining a reputation as a Tcarpio) is found in lakes and world-class trophy carp fishery. The lake streams all over Texas. Although not is home to the annual Austin Team Inland Fisheries Division a native species, it is well adapted to Championship, which attracts anglers 4200 Smith School Road Texas waters and is gaining popularity from several states and a few other coun- Austin, Texas 78744 (800) 792-1112 or (512) 389-4800 as a sport fish. Carp grow big, are easy tries. Lady Bird Lake was also the site of www.tpwd.texas.gov to catch, fight very hard, and you don’t the 2006 Texas Carp Challenge, which need a boat to fish for them. caused quite a stir when one angler © 2015 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD BR T3200-1429 (3/15) caught a 43.13-pound carp and won In accordance with Texas Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • B). Meat of Mammals of Heading 0106 (Heading 0208 Or 0210); (C
    Section I - Chapter 3 Fish and Crustaceans, Molluscs and Other Aquatic Invertebrates Notes 1. This chapter does not cover: (a). Mammals of heading 0106; (b). Meat of mammals of heading 0106 (heading 0208 or 0210); (c ). Fish (including livers, roes and milt thereof) or crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, dead and unfit or unsuitable for human consumption by reason of either their species or their condition (chapter 5); flours, meals or pellets of fish or of crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, unfit for human consumption (heading 2301); or (d). Caviar or caviar substitutes prepared from fish eggs (heading 1604). 2. In this chapter the term "pellets" means products which have been agglomerated whether directly by compression of by the addition of a small quantity of binder. Schedule B - Classification of Exports U.S. Census Bureau Chapter 03.xlsx - Page 1 Schedule B No. Unit of Second Commodity Description and Headings Quantity Quantity 03 Fish and Crustaceans, Molluscs and Other Aquatic Invertebrates 0301 - Live fish: - - Ornamental fish: 0301.11.0000 - - - Freshwater kg 0301.19.0000 - - - Other kg - - Other live fish: 0301.91.0000 - - - Trout (Salmo trutta, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Oncorhynchus clarki, Oncorhynchus aguabonita, Oncorhynchus gilae, Oncorhynchus apache and Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) kg 0301.92.0000 - - - Eels (Anguilla spp.) kg 0301.93.0200 - - - Carp (Cyprinus spp., Carassius spp., Ctenopharyngodon idellus, Hypophthalmichthys spp., Cirrhinus spp., Mylopharyngodon piceus, Catla catla, Labeo
    [Show full text]