DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Evaluation of Petroleum Impacts to Soil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Evaluation of Petroleum Impacts to Soil Integrated Evaluation of Petroleum Impacts to Soil Randy Adams, D. Marín, C. Avila, L. de la Cruz, C. Morales, and V. Domínguez Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, Mexico [email protected] 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 R2 = 0.9626 0.50 0.40 1-IAFcorr 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Conc. hidrocarburos (mg/Kg) Actual Modelo BACKGROUND U J A T •Clean-up criteria for petroleum contaminated soils developed in US in 60’s and 70’s on drilling cuttings •1% considered OK – no or only slight damage to crops, only lasts one growing season •Bioassays confirmed low toxicity of residual oil •Subsequenty used as a basis for clean-up criteria for hydrocarbons in soils in many countries does not consider kind of hydrocarbons does not consider kind of soil SISTEMATIC EVALUATION U J A T •Selection of light, medium, heavy and extra-heavy crudes •Selection of 5 soil types common in petroleum producing region of SE Mexico •Contamination of soil at different concentrations •Measurement of acute toxicity (Microtox), and subchronic toxicity (28 d earthworm) •Measurement of impacts to soil fertility: water repellency, soil moisure, compaction, complemented with in situ weathering experiments •Measurement of plant growth: pasture, black beans Crude Petroleum Used in Study U J A T 100% 80% 60% Aliphatics Aromatics 40% Polars + Resins Asphaltenes 20% 0% Light Crude Medium Crude Heavy Crude Extra-heavy Crude 37 ºAPI 27 ºAPI 15 ºAPI 3 ºAPI U J A T FAO: FLUVISOL VERTISOL GLEYSOL ARENOSOL ACRISOL USDA: FLUVENT VERTISOL GLEYSOL PSAMMENT ULTISOL • rich alluvial soil • gilgai microrelief • seasonally flooded •coastal sandy soil • weathered soil from Pleistocene Terrace • medium texture • high clay content • high clay content •very low clay and silt content • good internal • smectite clays: • smectite clays: • sandy-clay texture drainage high shrink-swell high shrink-swell •excessive internal • clays: kaolinites capacity capacity drainage • aerobic and oxides of conditions • poor internal • poor internal Fe/Al, – no shrink drainage drainage swell capacity cacao, maize, pasture, pasture, pasture, coconuts pasture, pineapple, beans, pasture, some maize savannah oak citrus, sugarcane sugarcane, (Macuilís) watermellon, chiles, tomatoes Soils Used in Study Acute Toxicity U J A T •More toxic with lighter crude and in high concentrations •However, at 1% non-toxic in acute test B: baseline (control) L: Light M: Medium Arenosol H: Heavy X: Extraheavy (Psamment) non-toxic indeterminate Toxicity Units Toxicity slight sandy soil toxic H-10 H-10 H-20 H-40 H-80 H-10 H-10 H-20 H-40 H-80 Acute Toxicity U J A T •More toxic with lighter crude and in high concentrations •However, at 1% non-toxic in acute test B: baseline L: Light Acrisol M: Medium H: Heavy (Ultisol) X: Extraheavy A: non-toxic red clay Toxicity Units Units Toxicity Toxicity B:indeterminate soil C: slight B X-10 X-10 X-20 X-40 X-80 H-10 H-10 H-20 H-40 H-80 Acute Toxicity U J A T •High variability with some samples •In general, low-null toxicity in alluvial soils Fluvisol 30,00 L: LigeroLight 25,00 M: Mediano P:M: Pesado Medium 20,00 E:H: ExtrapesadoHeavy Fluvisol X: Extraheavy 15,00 1%: 10,000 ppm (Fluvent) 2%: 20,000 ppm 4%: 40,000 ppm Toxicidad (UT) Toxicidad 10,00 8%: 80,000 ppm Toxicity Units Toxicity 5,00 river levee soil 0,00 L 1% L 2% L 4% L 8% L E 1% E 2% E 4% E 8% E P 1% P 2% P 4% P 8% P M4% X1% X1% X2% X4% X8% H1% H1% H2% H4% H8% M 1% M 2% M 8% M Acute Toxicity U J A T •High variability with some samples •In general, low-null toxicity in alluvial soils Vertisol 20,00 L:L: LightLigero 18,00 M: Mediano 16,00 M:P: PesadoMedium 14,00 H:E: HeavyExtrapesado Vertisol 12,00 X: Extraheavy 10,00 1%: 10,000 ppm 2%: 20,000 ppm 8,00 4%: 40,000 ppm Toxicidad (UT) Toxicidad 6,00 8%: 80,000 ppm brown clay 4,00 soil Toxicity Units Toxicity 2,00 0,00 L 1% L 2% L 4% L 8% L E 1% E 2% E 4% E 8% E P 1% P 2% P 4% P 8% P M4% X1% X1% X2% X4% X8% H1% H1% H2% H4% H8% M 8% M M 1% M 2% M Acute Toxicity U J A T •High variability with some samples •In general, low-null toxicity in alluvial soils Gleysol 25,00 L: Ligero M:L: MedianoLight 20,00 P: Pesado M: Medium E: Extrapesado Gleysol 15,00 H: Heavy 1%: 10,000 ppm 2%:X: Extraheavy 20,000 ppm 10,00 4%: 40,000 ppm Toxicidad (UT) Toxicidad 8%: 80,000 ppm floodable 5,00 brown clay Toxicity Units Toxicity soil 0,00 L 1% L 2% L 4% L 8% L E 1% E 2% E 4% E 8% E P 1% P 2% P 4% P 8% P M4% X1% X1% X2% X4% X8% H1% H1% H2% H4% H8% M 1% M 2% M 8% M Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Limited toxicity with light crude, greater with medium crude •No toxicity observed in heavy crude until 4 weeks (evasion?) 10000 ppm control light Arenosol medium (Psamment) heavy % % mortality extraheavy sandy soil days Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Biomass loss in first 2 weeks and then recovery (~2 mo. ?) •Recovery much slower with heavy crude 100 10000 ppm control 80 Arenosol light (Psamment) 60 medium heavy 40 Biomass (%) Biomass extraheavy (normalizaded) 20 sandy soil 0 0 10 20 30 days Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Limited toxicity with light crude, greater with medium crude •Very low toxicity with heavy crude, but with extraheavy crude after 3 weeks formation of compacted clumps 10000 ppm control light Acrisol % % mortality medium (Ultisol) heavy extraheavy red clay soil days Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Biomass loss in first 2 weeks, then recovery (~3-8 weeks) •No evidence of recovery for extraheavy crude (clumps) 10000 ppm control light Acrisol medium (Ultisol) heavy extraheavy % biomass, (normalized) biomass,% red clay soil days Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Very low mortality in alluvial soils (only 4%, in heavy crude) •Bioavailability limited by presence of silts and clays; Clays with shrink-swell capacity no clumping 100 Heavy 80 Crude 60 80,000ppm Fluvisol Mortality (%) Mortality 40 40,000ppm (Fluvent) 20,000ppm 20 10,000ppm 0 river levee 0 7 14 21 soil days Subchronic Toxicity U J A T •Low-nul mortality in alluvial soils (0%, in heavy crude) •Bioavailability limited by presence of silts and clays; Clays with shrink-swell capacity no clumping 100 80 Heavy 60 Crude 80,000ppm Mortality (%) Mortality 40 Vertisol 40,000ppm 20 20,000ppm 0 brown clay 0 7 14 21 soil days Problems with Fertility U J A T •Evidence from US, Canada, SE Mexico indicate potential fertility problems, especially with weathered hydrocarbons: •More weathered HC molecules act as chemical bridges between SOM and non -polar HC •Important in formation of hydrocarbon layers on soil particles: •Water repellency, field capacity •Aglomeration and compaction Model for Soil Water Repellency U J A T Non - or low polarity hydrocarbons Weathered, slighlty polar hydrocarbons Natural organic material (charged/polar/non-polar) Mineral Fraction (negative charge) (From: Litvina et al. 2003) Soil Water Repellency U J A T Soil Water Repellency U J A T • In Fluvisol and Vertisol water repellency could be modeled based on ºAPI and TPH concentration Vertisol In situ Moisture Content U J A T • open air weathering experiments (1 yr) Compaction U J A T • measured with soil penetrometer after weathering expts. (1 yr) • observations from worm assays Type of hydrocarbons Type of soil Conc. of hydrocarbons Recent spill or weathered U J A T Plant Growth in Hydrocarbon Toxicity Fertility Contaminated Soil Type of crop Conceptual or pasture Model Plant development ? and growth Plant Growth U J A T • pasture planted by stolons • cut every 2 mo. and above ground biomass measured Pasture Production 1.00 • catch up? …or • degraded soil conditions? control 0.80 • on-going experiment light 0.60 medium 0.40 heavy Biomass (dry, g) (dry, Biomass 0.20 extraheavy 0.00 Fluvisol1 Vertisol 2 Gleysol 3 Arenosol 4 Acrisol 5 CONCLUSIONS U J A T Impacts of petroleum contamination in soil are affected by: •Type of Petroleum: lighter crudes are more acutely toxic (but temporary) heavier crudes are more likely to impact fertility: •polar groups lead to formation of HC laminates water repellency/soil moisture soil compaction •recovery may be very, very slow CONCLUSIONS U J A T Impacts of petroleum contamination in soil are affected by: •Type and abundance of soil clays: smectites: high surface area, expansive (in brown-grey soils) reduce toxicity (low bioavailability) very little water repellency (lots of reactive surface area) very little compaction (shrink-swell properties) non-smectites: kaolinites, amorphous Fe/Al oxides low surface area, non-expansive (in red-clay soils) med-high toxicity (more bioavailability) med-high water repellency (less reactive surface area) a lot or compaction (no shrink-swell properties) CONCLUSIONS U J A T Impacts of petroleum contamination in soil are affected by: •Type and abundance of soil clays: very sandy soils: practically no clay (<1%) med-high toxicity (almost complete bioavailability) high water repellency (very little reactive surface area) no compaction (absence of clays: basically no aggregates) Thank you for your attention [email protected] non-smectite very clays abundant smectite clays absent PSAMMENT ARENOSOL VERTISOL VERTISOL FLUVISOL FLUVISOL FLUVENT GLEYSOL GLEYSOL ACRISOL ULTISOL CRUDE PETROLEUM CRUDE med-high very low toxicity med-high very water repellency med-high little low soil moisture very high very high little compaction none CRUDE PETROLEUM light type of crude extraheavy med-high toxicity very low water repellency very little low soil moisture high none compaction high ARENOSOL PSAMMENT FLUVISOL FLUVENT toxicity med-high VERTISOL smectite smectite claysVERTISOL absent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes in Soil Properties in a Fluvisol (Calcaric) Amended with Coal Fly Ash A
    Changes in soil properties in a fluvisol (calcaric) amended with coal fly ash A. Riehl, F. Elsass, J. Duplay, F. Huber, M. Trautmann To cite this version: A. Riehl, F. Elsass, J. Duplay, F. Huber, M. Trautmann. Changes in soil properties in a fluvisol (calcaric) amended with coal fly ash. Geoderma, Elsevier, 2010, 155 (1-2), pp.67-74. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.025. halsde-00546980 HAL Id: halsde-00546980 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00546980 Submitted on 30 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Geoderma 155 (2010) 67–74 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoderma journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Changes in soil properties in a fluvisol (calcaric) amended with coal fly ash A. Riehl a, F. Elsass b, J. Duplay a,⁎, F. Huber a, M. Trautmann c a Laboratoire d'Hydrologie et de Géochimie de Strasbourg, UMR 7517 CNRS, 1 rue Blessig 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France b Institut National de Recherche Agronomique, route de Saint-Cyr 78026Versailles, France c UMS 830 UDS/CNRS, Laboratoire d'Analyses des Sols et des Formations Superficielles, 3 rue de l'Argonne 67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France article info abstract Article history: Fluidized bed combustion ash (FBC) is a by-product from coal-fired power stations used for many decades in Received 25 March 2009 concrete, cement and brick manufacturing and more recently for trace metal immobilization and pesticide Received in revised form 17 November 2009 retention in soils.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soil Map of the Flemish Region Converted to the 3 Edition of the World Reference Base for Soil Resources
    Ontwikkelen en toepassen van een methodiek voor de vertaling van de Belgische bodemclassificatie van de kustpolders naar het internationale WRB systeem en generaliseren van de WRB-bodemkaart voor gans Vlaanderen naar het 1 : 250 000 schaalniveau The soil map of the Flemish region converted to the 3 rd edition of the World Reference Base for soil resources Stefaan Dondeyne, Laura Vanierschot, Roger Langohr Eric Van Ranst and Jozef Deckers Oct. 2014 Opdracht van de Vlaamse Overheid Bestek nr. BOD/STUD/2013/01 Contents Contents............................................................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgement ...........................................................................................................................................5 Abstract............................................................................................................................................................7 Samenvatting ...................................................................................................................................................9 1. Background and objectives.......................................................................................................................11 2. The soil map of Belgium............................................................................................................................12 2.1 The soil survey project..........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Soil Compaction on Chemical Properties of Mollic Fluvisol Soil Under Lucerne (Medicago Sativa L.)
    Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 22, No. 1 (2013), 107-113 Original Research The Influence of Soil Compaction on Chemical Properties of Mollic Fluvisol Soil under Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) Tomasz Głąb1, Krzysztof Gondek2 1Institute of Machinery Exploitation, Ergonomics and Production Processes, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Poland 2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Poland Received: 28 January 2012 Accepted: 3 August 2012 Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of soil compaction on the chemical properties of soil and herbage yield of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). A field experiment was conducted on a silty loam Mollic Fluvisols soil in 2003-07. Four compaction treatments were applied three times annually by tractor using the following number of passes: control without experimental traffic, two passes, four passes, and six passes. This study confirmed the unfavorable effect of multiple tractor passes on lucerne dry matter produc- tion. The results showed that tractor traffic reduced the yields of lucerne, particularly during the second and third harvests in each year. Soil compaction caused by tractors changed some chemical properties of soil. Tractor passes resulted in increasing pH and EC. It also increased P and Zn content. Most of these changes were statistically significant only in the deeper 20-30 cm soil layer. This effect could be ascribed to higher soil density and lower air permeability. The upper (0-20 cm) soil layer was resistant to changes in chemical prop- erties, probably due to the dense root system that recovers the soil after compaction and improves physical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants
    COMMUN. SOIL SCI. PLANT ANAL., 32(7&8), 921–950 (2001) NUTRIENT USE EFFICIENCY IN PLANTS V. C. Baligar,1 N. K. Fageria,2 and Z. L. He 3 1 USDA-ARS-AFSRC Beaver, WV 25813-9423 2 EMBRAPA-CNPAF, Goania, GO Brazil 74001–970 3 Zhejiang University Dept. of Natural Resource, Hangzhou, China 310029 ABSTRACT Invariably, many agricultural soils of the world are deficient in one or more of the essential nutrients needed to support healthy plants. Acidity, alkalinity, salinity, anthropogenic processes, nature of farming, and erosion can lead to soil degradation. Additions of fertilizers and/or amendments are essential for a proper nutrient supply and maximum yields. Estimates of overall efficiency of ap- plied fertilizer have been reported to be about or lower than 50% for N, less than 10% for P, and about 40% for K. Plants that are efficient in absorption and utilization of nutrients greatly enhance the efficiency of applied fertilizers, reducing cost of inputs, and pre- venting losses of nutrients to ecosystems. Inter- and intra-specific variation for plant growth and mineral nutrient use efficiency(NUE) are known to be under genetic and physiological control and are modified by plant interactions with environmental variables. There is need for breeding programs to focus on developing cultivars with high NUE. Identification of traits such as nutrient absorption, transport, utilization, and mobilization in plant cultivars should greatly enhance fertilizer use efficiency. The development of new cultivars with higher NUE, coupled with best management prac- 921 Copyright ᭧ 2001 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com 922 BALIGAR, FAGERIA, AND HE tices (BMPs) will contribute to sustainable agricultural systems that protect and promote soil, water and air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Soils/Land Use Study Resources
    2021 NCF Envirothon Soil Test Study Guide Lincoln, Nebraska 2021 NCF-Envirothon Nebraska Soils and Land Use Study Resources Key Topic #1: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation 1. Describe the five soil forming factors, and how they influence soil properties. 2. Explain the defining characteristics of a soil describing how the basic soil forming processes influence affect these characteristics in different types of soil. 3. Identify different types of parent material, their origins, and how they impact the soil that develops from them. 4. Identify and describe soil characteristics (horizon, texture, structure, color). 5. Identify and understand physical features of soil profiles and be able to use this information interpret soil properties and limitations. Study Resources Sample Soil Description Scorecard – University of Nebraska – Lincoln Land Judging Documents, edited by Judy Turk, 2021 (Pages 3-4) Soil Description Field Manual Reference – University of Nebraska – Lincoln Land Judging Documents, edited by Judy Turk, 2021 (Pages 5-17) Correlation of Field Texturing Soils by Feel, Understanding Soil Laboratory Data, and Use of the Soil Textural Triangle – Patrick Cowsert, 2021 (Pages 18-21) Tips for Measuring Percent Slope on Contour Maps – Excerpt from Forest Measurements by Joan DeYoung, 2018 (Pages 22-23) Glossary – Excerpts from Geomorphic Description System version 5.0, 2017, and Field Book for Describing Soils version 3.0, 2012 (Pages 24-27) Study Resources begin on the next page! Contestant Number Sample Soil Description Card Site/Pit Number Host: University of Nebraska – Lincoln Number of Horizons Lower Profile Depth 2021 –Scorecard Nail Depth A. Soil Morphology Part A Score __________ Moist Horizons Boundary Texture Color Redox.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedogenic and Contemporary Issues of Fluvisol Characterization and Utilisation in the Wetlands of Bamenda Municipality, Cameroon
    Asian Soil Research Journal 4(3): 8-27, 2020; Article no.ASRJ.62665 ISSN: 2582-3973 Pedogenic and Contemporary Issues of Fluvisol Characterization and Utilisation in the Wetlands of Bamenda Municipality, Cameroon Godswill Azinwie Asongwe1,2*, Bernard P. K. Yerima3, Aaron Suh Tening4 and Irene Bongsiysi Bame5 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Buea, P.O.Box 63, Buea, Cameroon. 2Department of Development Studies, Pan African Institute for Development – West Africa (PAID-WA) Buea, P.O. Box 133, Buea, Cameroon. 3Department of Soil Science, University of Dschang, P.O Box 222, Dschang, Cameroon. 4Department of Agronomic and Applied Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63, Buea, Cameroon. 5Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Bambui, Cameroon. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author GAA designed and carried out the study, performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Authors BPKY and AST validated the study. Author IBB managed the analyses of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/ASRJ/2020/v4i330093 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Salem Aboglila, Azzaytuna University, Libya. Reviewers: (1) Nikoletta Edit Nagy, University of Debrecen, Hungary. (2) Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, Trier University, Germany, University of Valencia, Spain. (3) José Leonardo Ledea Rodríguez, Northwest Biological Research Center, Mexico. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/62665 Received 12 September 2020 Original Research Article Accepted 18 November 2020 Published 09 December 2020 ABSTRACT Fluvisols in urban wetlands in Bamenda Municipality Cameroon play a vital role in vegetable production but they are under immense pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Waterlogging on Soil Biochemical Properties and Organic Matter Quality
    26 Effect of waterlogging on soil biochemical properties and organic matter quality 27 in different salt marsh systems 28 29 Chiara Ferronatoa, Sara Marinarib, Ornella Franciosoa, Diana Belloc, Carmen Trasar-Cepedac, Livia 30 Vittori Antisaria 31 32 a Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari, Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di 33 Bologna, Via Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, Italy 34 b Dipartimento per l’ Innovazione dei Sistemi Biologici, Agroalimentari e Forestali, Università della 35 Tuscia, Via S. Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy 36 c Departamento de Bioquímica del Suelo, Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia- 37 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Apartado 122, 15780 Santiago de Compostela, 38 Spain 39 40 Abstract 41 This study investigated the effects of hydroperiod on soil organic matter quality in three different salt 42 marshes in the Baiona lagoon (N Italy) representing terrestrial, intertidal and subaqueous ecosystems 43 in the area. The study specifically aimed to gain some insight into how soil waterlogging 44 (hydroperiod) affects the chemical and biological properties of soils as well as the quality and 45 structure of the soil organic matter (SOM). Total contents of selected nutrients, total organic carbon 46 and carbon stable isotope (δC 13) were measured in all soil profiles. The results of these analyses 47 enabled us to define the different origin of the SOM by discriminating between terrestrial and aquatic 48 SOM sources. The findings also show that accumulation of nutrients and SOM is significantly 49 magnified in intertidal systems, in which pedoturbation effects induced by water movements are 50 particularly strong. In addition, DRIFT spectra of humic acids revealed the changes in the main 2 51 functional groups in relation to increased waterlogging, highlighting the lower aromaticity and 52 complexity in subaqueous soils (SASs), which is possibly due to the effect of the soil water saturation 53 on the chemical and biological SOM transformation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Soil Type on the Reliability of the Prediction Model
    agronomy Article Influence of Soil Type on the Reliability of the Prediction Model for Bioavailability of Mn, Zn, Pb, Ni and Cu in the Soils of the Republic of Serbia Jelena Maksimovi´c*, Radmila Pivi´c,Aleksandra Stanojkovi´c-Sebi´c , Marina Jovkovi´c,Darko Jaramaz and Zoran Dini´c Institute of Soil Science, Teodora Drajzera 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (A.S.-S.); [email protected] (M.J.); [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (Z.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The principles of sustainable agriculture in the 21st century are based on the preservation of basic natural resources and environmental protection, which is achieved through a multidisciplinary approach in obtaining solutions and applying information technologies. Prediction models of bioavailability of trace elements (TEs) represent the basis for the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence in digital agriculture. Since the bioavailability of TEs is influenced by the physicochemical properties of the soil, which are characteristic of the soil type, in order to obtain more reliable prediction models in this study, the testing set from the previous study was grouped based on the soil type. The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of improvement in the prediction of bioavailability of TEs by using a different strategy of model development. After the training set was grouped based on the criteria for the new model development, the developed basic models were compared to the basic models from the previous study. The second step was to develop Citation: Maksimovi´c,J.; Pivi´c,R.; models based on the soil type (for the eight most common soil types in the Republic of Serbia—RS) Stanojkovi´c-Sebi´c,A.; Jovkovi´c,M.; and to compare their reliability to the basic models.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Soil Types in Wetland Meadows in the South of the Chilean Patagonia
    266RESEARCH CHIL. J. AGRIC. RES. - VOL. 70 - Nº 2 - 2010 VARIABILITY OF SOIL TYPES IN WETLAND MEADOWS IN THE SOUTH OF THE CHILEAN PATAGONIA Ladislava Filipová1*, Radim Hédl2, and Nilo Covacevich C.3 ABSTRACT The wetland meadows and pastures (vegas) of the agricultural zone of the Magallanes Region and the Chilean Patagonia are productive and intensively exploited ecosystems. However, there is scarce data about the typology and the physical and chemical properties of the soils that determine the agricultural potential of vegas sites. Sampling of the main horizons of 47 soil profiles was conducted throughout the area. The profiles were described in the field and consequently classified according to the soil typology system of the WRB (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006). Analyses of bulk and particle densities, capillary water capacity, pH (H2O), pH (CaCl2), texture, organic material, C:N ratio, electrical conductivity, effective cation exchange capacity, N, P, Ca-Mg-K-Na, exchangeable Al, 2- extractable Al, sulfur SO4 , B, and micronutrients (Cu-Zn-Mn-Fe) were carried out. The most frequently recorded groups of soil types in the studied vegas were Histosols - peat soils (20 profiles), and Fluvisols (19). Gleysols (3), Vertisols (1), Regosols (3), Solonchaks (1) and Solonetzs (1) were detected with much less frequency. There is also considerable variability in soil properties among and within the groups of soil types. The principal differences between the Histosols and the Fluvisols are the content of organic matter (often peat), pH level (related to the absence/presence of carbonates) and associated soil properties. Fluvisols are more susceptible to salinization under conditions of aridity, whereas the main threat to Histosols is artificial drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Dog and Burrowing Owl Habitat Analysis Throughout Nebraska: Summary
    Prairie Dog and Burrowing Owl Habitat Analysis throughout Nebraska: Summary Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Report. 2012. Andy Bishop1, Laura Achterberg1, Roger Grosse1, Ele Nugent1, and Christopher Jorgensen1,2 1Rainwater Basin Joint Venture, 2550 North Diers Ave, Grand Island, NE 68801 2Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 422 Hardin Hall, 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583 Introduction For this analysis, we downloaded SSURGO data on a county by Identifying suitable habitat in the landscape for rare and elusive county basis from Soil Data Viewer 5.2 using ArcGIS 9.2. We species can assist wildlife managers in forming conservation merged multiple data layers together into a single shapefile to plans and can even facilitate new discoveries of species provide a statewide coverage. Each polygon in the dataset populations. The following project sought to identify available represented a single SSURGO map unit. We extracted the soil habitat for Burrowing Owls in Nebraska. Burrowing Owls are map unit name and the range site name from the Soil Data considered a Tier 1 at-risk species (i.e., a species globally or Viewer. nationally most at risk of extinction) by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (NGPC). We developed a conceptually Burrowing Owls are known to occupy burrows 200 cm below based, spatially explicit habitat suitability index to determine the the soil surface in Washington (Conway et al. 2006) and 69 cm remaining suitable habitat for Burrowing Owls in Nebraska. in Oklahoma (Butts and Lewis 1982). We took the average of Model development was based on a previous modeling exercise these two estimates, establishing burrow preference of 136 cm geared towards identifying suitable habitat for Black-tailed below the soil surface.
    [Show full text]
  • On Tropical Soils?
    AJCS 13(11):1777-1785 (2019) ISSN:1835-2707 doi: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.11.p1562 Could 137Cs remediation be accomplished with stable cesium (CsCl) on tropical soils? Riviane Maria Albuquerque Donha1*, Mário Roque2, Antônio Enedi Boaretto2, Antonio Sergio Ferraudo1, Elcio Ferreira Santos2, Fernando Giovannetti Macedo1, Wanderley José Melo13, José Lavres Junior2 1UNESP – São Paulo State University, Postal Code 79560-000, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil 2USP – University of São Paulo, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture. Postal Code 13416-000, Piraicaba, SP, Brazil 3Brasil University, Postal Code 13690-000, Descalvado, SP, Brazil *Correspondence authorl: [email protected] Abstract Stable cesium can be considered as the best element for desorption of soil radio-cesium. It is considered an element that slightly absorbed by plants, so that the application of high doses to the soil could increase the absorption of 137Cs, which is desired for the remediation of contaminated soils. There is shortage of knowledge on remediation of tropical and subtropical soils contaminated with 137Cs. The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of 133Cs for the remediation of Brazilian tropical and subtropical soils contaminated with 137Cs. In addition, we investigated the Cs uptake by bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in Cs contaminated soil. The experiment was carried out in pots under greenhouse conditions. Seven soil types were used in the experiment (Oxisol, Udox, Psamment, Ochrept; Aquoll; Udox and Udult), which received the application of four doses of 133Cs (0, 5, 10 and 20 mg/pot in a completely randomized design arranged in a factorial scheme (7 soil types x 4 doses of 133Cs) with three replicates.
    [Show full text]