Recommendations to the Food and Drug Administration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recommendations to the Food and Drug Administration RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FROM THE NATIONAL BLACK CHURCH INITIATIVE July 5, 2017 Honorable Dr. Scott Gottlieb, M.D. Commissioner U.S. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993 Through: Church of God in Christ African Methodist Episcopal Church African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church Christian Methodist Episcopal Church Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship International National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc. Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc. Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, Inc. The Union of Black Episcopalians National Council of Churches International Council of Community Churches Unity Fellowship Church Movement Mount Calvary Holy Churches of America Greater Mount Calvary Holy Church American Baptist Churches Berean Missionary Baptist Church The Potter’s House Dear Honorable Dr.Gottlieb, Congratulations on your appointment as the Commissioner of the FDA. We are extremely pleased that you are willing to meet with us and consider recommendations of increasing African Americans in clinical trials. Let us pledge our entire support of 34,000 Black Churches behind your agenda during your tenure. We are committed to helping to produce safe and effective drugs, nutritious and disease-free food, and innovation in the process of these two industries that are now under your regulatory control. We are committed to making your tenure the most successful in the history of the FDA. Five years ago, the National Black Church Initiative Board and Denominational Leadership decided we needed to be a part of the coalition to improve our nation’s health after the passing of the Affordable Care Act. We had a brainstorming session three years ago about what our approach would be in this endeavor. One of the first steps that we decided on was to tackle the regulatory issues surrounding the ACA to ensure on a regulatory level that African Americans were being treated fairly and equally, which we have a moral and constitutional right to and to create an environment and processes towards increasing African American access to care. We have worked with numerous policy groups around Washington, including PhRMA to make sure that the regulations that were being written were balanced and driven solely by hard science and not economics. We also worked with pharmaceutical companies to create a comprehensive initiative to improve the participatory level of African Americans in clinical trials and bioresearch. We first sought to work with pharmaceuticals on the issue of the Affordable Care Act only to be rebuffed by the industry. So, we gathered again and offered a major push towards clinical trials using the full weight and might of our 34,000 churches and 15.7 million congregants. We wrote the Honorable Francis Collins a letter inquiring about the nature of what the government was doing around the NIH Policy and Guidelines on The Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. We were then sent a cursory letter of no substance and felt that again we were being rebuffed by our own government inquiring about a regulation that they themselves created. You can imagine the deep frustration that 34,000 clergy felt at that time. We also wrote a letter to President Trump about extorting the value and the benefits of clinical trials and research. At the same time we wrote to PhRMA on February 4th endorsing their bold initiative of explaining to the American public the value of research and drug intervention. Again, we are sad to report that we never got a written response from PhRMA and felt rebuffed by getting a call from a low-aid who felt as though they were not taking this initiative as serious as we had presented it. Recently we wrote PhRMA again, telling them about our deep disappointment. Considering the pushback, we have reached out to the Food and Drug Administration and we were hoping to work with you through regulations to compel the pharmaceutical industry to address the issues we set forth in the letter to the Honorable Francis Collins. We look forward to future discussions with you and speaking in depth on how we can finally get this done after 25 years of deep frustration from 15.7 million African Americans who are citizens of this great country. We initially sent a letter to the Honorable Francis Collins but never received a letter from him, though we did receive a letter from the Office of Minority Health which was insulting to 15.7 million African Americans who are trying to improve their health. They believe that a simple letter is sufficient from a community who struggles under the weight of health disparities. We do not. Through its innovative Clinical Trial Education Awareness Participation Program (CTEAPP), NBCI could be an answer to the industry’s perplexing problem. “Despite advances in literacy and education as well as major improvements in communication…in this period of unprecedented acceleration in the pace of scientific and technological advances, and the educational focus on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)…there will still be a great gap between medical (protective) knowledge and the public acceptance of it.” - Bailus Walker PhD, MPH The healthcare industry has a major problem, but neither the pharmaceutical industry nor the other major players in healthcare are not going to do anything about this problem until they are compelled by strong regulatory from the FDA. We are willing to work in a regulatory position or a substantive partnership to achieve the goals of these recommendations. Let us make it very clear that the National Black Church Initiative is not going away. We will prosecute this issue across the proper channels and through the public if necessary. We should set up a meeting with the Chair of the oversight appropriation committee to drive home this point so we can refer to the meeting in this letter. Sincerely, Rev. Anthony Evans President CC: Dr. James E.K. Hildreth, Ph.D., M.D. President & Chief Executive Officer Meharry Medical College 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd, Jr. Blvd. Nashville, Tennessee 37208 Dr. Deborah B. Prothrow-Stith, M.D. Dean Charles R. Drew University College of Medicine 1731 E. 120th Street, Cobb 109 Los Angeles, CA 90059 Dr. Valerie Montgomery Rice, M.D., F.A.C.O.G. President & Dean Morehouse School of Medicine 720 Westview Drive Atlanta, GA 30310 Dr. Hugh E. Mighty, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.O.G. Dean Howard University College of Medicine 520 W St., NW. Washington, D.C. 20059 July 5, 2017 Honorable Dr. Scott Gottlieb, M.D. Commissioner U.S. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993 Through: Church of God in Christ African Methodist Episcopal Church African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church Christian Methodist Episcopal Church Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship International National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc. Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc. Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, Inc. The Union of Black Episcopalians National Council of Churches International Council of Community Churches Unity Fellowship Church Movement Mount Calvary Holy Churches of America Greater Mount Calvary Holy Church American Baptist Churches Berean Missionary Baptist Church The Potter’s House Dear Honorable Dr.Gottlieb, Congratulations on your appointment as the Commissioner of the FDA. We are extremely pleased that you are willing to meet with us and consider recommendations of increasing African Americans in clinical trials. Let us pledge our entire support of 34,000 Black Churches behind your agenda during your tenure. We are committed to helping to produce safe and effective drugs, nutritious and disease-free food, and innovation in the process of these two industries that are now under your regulatory control. We are committed to making your tenure the most successful in the history of the FDA. Five years ago, the National Black Church Initiative Board and Denominational Leadership decided we needed to be a part of the coalition to improve our nation’s health after the passing of the Affordable Care Act. We had a brainstorming session three years ago about what our approach would be in this endeavor. One of the first steps that we decided on was to tackle the regulatory issues surrounding the ACA to ensure on a regulatory level that African Americans were being treated fairly and equally, which we have a moral and constitutional right to and to create an environment and processes towards increasing African American access to care. We have worked with numerous policy groups around Washington, including PhRMA to make sure that the regulations that were being written were balanced and driven solely by hard science and not economics. We also worked with pharmaceutical companies to create a comprehensive initiative to improve the participatory level of African Americans in clinical trials and bioresearch. We first sought to work with pharmaceuticals on the issue of the Affordable Care Act only to be rebuffed by the industry. So, we gathered again and offered a major push towards clinical trials using the full weight and might of our 34,000 churches and 15.7 million congregants. We wrote the Honorable Francis Collins a letter inquiring about the nature of what the government was doing around the NIH Policy and Guidelines on The Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. We were then sent a cursory letter of no substance and felt that again we were being rebuffed by our own government inquiring about a regulation that they themselves created. You can imagine the deep frustration that 34,000 clergy felt at that time. We also wrote a letter to President Trump about extorting the value and the benefits of clinical trials and research.
Recommended publications
  • When Human Experimentation Is Criminal L
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 99 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall Fall 2008 When Human Experimentation is Criminal L. Song Richardson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation L. Song Richardson, When Human Experimentation is Criminal, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 89 (2008-2009) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/09/9901-0089 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 99, No. I Copyright 0 2009 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. WHEN HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION IS CRIMINAL L. SONG RICHARDSON* Medical researchers engaged in human experimentation commit criminal acts seemingly without consequence. Whereas other actors who violate bodily integrity and autonomy are routinely penalized with convictions for assault, fraud, and homicide, researchers escape criminal punishment. This Article begins to scrutinize this undercriminalization phenomenon and provides a framework for understandingwhy researchers are not prosecuted for their crimes. It argues that their exalted social status, combined with the perceived social benefit of their research, immunizes them from use of the criminal sanction. Whether these constitute sufficient grounds to give researchers a pass from punishment is a significant question because the state's failure to act creates expressive harms. It displays attitudes towards victims and perpetrators that negatively affect the values of autonomy and dignity in medical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Augmentation in Clinical Practice
    Tissue Augmentation in Clinical Practice DDK1223_FM.inddK1223_FM.indd 1 110/12/050/12/05 88:45:28:45:28 AAMM PProcessrocess CCyanyanPProcessrocess MMagentaagentaPProcessrocess YYellowellowPProcessrocess BBlacklack BASIC AND CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY Series Editors ALAN R. SHALITA, M.D. Distinguished Teaching Professor and Chairman Department of Dermatology SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, New York DAVID A. NORRIS, M.D. Director of Research Professor of Dermatology The University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Denver, Colorado 1. Cutaneous Investigation in Health and Disease: Noninvasive Methods and Instrumentation, edited by Jean-Luc Lévêque 2. Irritant Contact Dermatitis, edited by Edward M. Jackson and Ronald Goldner 3. Fundamentals of Dermatology: A Study Guide, Franklin S. Glickman and Alan R. Shalita 4. Aging Skin: Properties and Functional Changes, edited by Jean-Luc Lévêque and Pierre G. Agache 5. Retinoids: Progress in Research and Clinical Applications, edited by Maria A. Livrea and Lester Packer 6. Clinical Photomedicine, edited by Henry W. Lim and Nicholas A. Soter 7. Cutaneous Antifungal Agents: Selected Compounds in Clinical Practice and Development, edited by John W. Rippon and Robert A. Fromtling 8. Oxidative Stress in Dermatology, edited by Jürgen Fuchs and Lester Packer 9. Connective Tissue Diseases of the Skin, edited by Charles M. Lapière and Thomas Krieg 10. Epidermal Growth Factors and Cytokines, edited by Thomas A. Luger and Thomas Schwarz 11. Skin Changes and Diseases in Pregnancy, edited by Marwali Harahap and Robert C. Wallach 12. Fungal Disease: Biology, Immunology, and Diagnosis, edited by Paul H. Jacobs and Lexie Nall 13. Immunomodulatory and Cytotoxic Agents in Dermatology, edited by Charles J. McDonald 14.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Case 2:06-cv-05121-WY Document 17 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM BRADFORD, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL. : NO. 06-CV-5121 Memorandum and Order YOHN, J. August ______, 2007 Pro se plaintiff William Bradford seeks to recover damages from defendants the City of Philadelphia, Dr. Albert Kligman, the University of Pennsylvania, Dow Chemical and Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiff alleges that he was subjected to certain unspecified medical tests while incarcerated at Holmesburg Correctional Facility in Philadelphia in 1957. Plaintiff’s complaint claims that defendants’ conduct constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eight Amendment. A liberal reading of plaintiff’s complaint could also include a state law claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. Defendants have each filed Motions to Dismiss. As regrettable as the testing program at Holmesburg may have been, I am compelled to conclude that plaintiff’s claims at this late date, fifty years later and ten years after plaintiff admitted his knowledge of the effects on his health, are all barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and therefore defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be granted. I. Background Plaintiff was arrested in October, 1957, and incarcerated at Holmesburg Correctional Facility in Philadelphia while awaiting trial. While incarcerated, plaintiff alleges that he was told by prison authorities that he could participate in medical tests for compensation. Plaintiff states Case 2:06-cv-05121-WY Document 17 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 7 that he was not warned that any of the tests were potentially dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Regulating Social Science Research with Biomedical Regulations
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-2011 The impact of regulating social science research with biomedical regulations Brenda Braxton Durosinmi University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, Higher Education and Teaching Commons, Other Law Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Repository Citation Durosinmi, Brenda Braxton, "The impact of regulating social science research with biomedical regulations" (2011). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2821184 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE IMPACT OF REGULATING SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH WITH BIOMEDICAL REGULATIONS By Brenda Braxton Durosinmi Bachelor of General Studies Virginia
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Science in Captivity: The Visual Culture and Bioethics of Biomedicine behind Bars Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cr4q85p Author Visperas, Maria Cristina Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Science in Captivity: The Visual Culture and Bioethics of Biomedicine behind Bars A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication (Science Studies) by Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas Committee in charge: Professor Patrick Anderson, Co-Chair Professor Lisa Cartwright, Co-Chair Professor Dennis Childs Professor Kelly Gates Professor Martha Lampland Professor Jared Sexton 2017 Copyright Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas, 2017 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas is approved, and acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Science in Captivity: The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Science in Captivity: The Visual Culture and Bioethics of Biomedicine behind Bars A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication (Science Studies) by Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas Committee in charge: Professor Patrick Anderson, Co-Chair Professor Lisa Cartwright, Co-Chair Professor Dennis Childs Professor Kelly Gates Professor Martha Lampland Professor Jared Sexton 2017 Copyright Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas, 2017 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Maria Cristina Mejia Visperas is approved, and acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... vii Vita ................................................................................................................................... viii Abstract .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snow White Jean Paul Gaultier Clearly Hopes White Will Be All Right
    VALENTINO SPA TAPS NEW CEO/2 KATE MOSS FRAGRANCE?/2 Women’sWWD Wear Daily • The Retailers’ FRIDAYDaily Newspaper • December 15, 2006 • $2.00 Beauty Snow White Jean Paul Gaultier clearly hopes white will be all right. The avant-garde designer is aiming to create a new bestseller with his men’s fragrance, Fleur du Male, which will launch in March in an all-white bottle. The fragrance will fi rst be sold in the designer’s boutiques, and in April will roll out to broader distribution. For more, see page 4. Pelosi’s Drive for Ports: Industry Foresees Chaos In 100% Screening Plan By Kristi Ellis WASHINGTON — The Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have not even taken control of the House yet and already they’ve upset retailers and apparel importers. In outlining her party’s agenda for its first 100 hours in office, House Speaker-elect Pelosi said she would bring to a vote early legislation requiring 100 percent screening of all cargo containers at foreign ports. This measure is aimed at stepping up the U.S. fight against terrorism. This prompted an immediate outcry from retailers and apparel vendors that imported $89.2 billion worth of See Pelosi, Page12 PHOTO BY THOMAS IANNACCONE; STYLED BY MEGAN MCINTYRE THOMAS IANNACCONE; STYLED BY PHOTO BY 2 WWD, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2006 WWD.COM Moss Said in Scent Deal WWDFRIDAY SOON IT MIGHT BE EAU DE KATE. Beauty Kate Moss is said to have signed a fragrance licensing deal with Coty Inc., the beauty fi rm that already boasts a star-studded roster of celebrity fragrance brands.
    [Show full text]