September 2003
Prepared by the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments and Wilbur Smith Associates for the Campbell County Fiscal Court
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
September, 2003
Prepared by the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments and Wilbur Smith Associates for the Campbell County Fiscal Court Campbell County Transportation Task Force
Judge/Executive Steve Pendery, Campbell County Fiscal Court, Chair
Hon. Ron Barth, City of Woodlawn Mr. Robert Marshall, Owen Electric Mr. Sam Beverage, Kentucky Mr. Donald Martin, City of Bellevue Transportation Cabinet, District 6 Hon. Daniel McGinley, City of Hon. Mary Brown, City of Ft. Thomas Alexandria Hon. Jim Callahan, State Hon. Charles Melville, City of Southgate Representative Mr. Jack Moreland, Campbell County Mr. Mike Dawson, Campbell Co. Leadership Action Group (CLAG) Schools Mr. Wally Pagan, Southbank Partners Mr. Mark Donaghy, Transit Authority of Mr. Henry Pogue, IV, Campbell County Northern Kentucky Industrial Authority Mr. Dan Dressman, Homebuilders Hon. Kenneth Rankle, City of Dayton Association of Northern Kentucky Ms. Fran Reitman, CC&MP&ZC Mr. Jeffery Eger, Sanitation District #1 Hon. Charles Roettger, City of Highland Mr. Danny Fore, TRI-ED Heights Hon. David Gearding, City of Mentor Col. David Sandfoss, Campbell County Mr. Don Girton, CC&MP&ZC Police Department Hon. Thomas Guidugli, City of Newport Ms. Mary Paula Schuh, Northern Mr. Glen Gunning, ULH&P Kentucky University Mr. Ron Gunning, City of Dayton Mr. Ken Schultz, Campbell County Mr. Chuck Heilman, Alexandria Roads Community Business Association Hon. Carl Schwarber, City of Silver Mr. Richard Hoskin, Progress With Grove Preservation Mr. Marshall Slagle, Northern Kentucky Mr. Barry House, Kentucky Area Planning Commission Transportation Cabinet Hon. Frank Smith, City of California Mr. Peter Klear, Campbell County Mr. John Sowinsky, Newport Schools Planning Hon. Katie Stine, State Senator Hon. Janet Krebs, City of Crestview Hon. Mark Stoeber, City of Cold Spring Hon. George Koopman, City of Mr. Gary Toebben, Northern Kentucky Melbourne Chamber of Commerce Ms. Linda Laake, N. Ky. Realtors Assoc. Mr. Terry Vance, City of Wilder Hon. Mike Leopold, City of Crestview Mr. Dennis Walter, Campbell County Mr. Ron Lovan, Northern Kentucky Cattlemen's Association Water District Hon. Paul Weghorn, City of Cold Spring Hon. Helen Lutz, City of Melbourne Mr. Robert Yeager, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, District 6
Campbell County Transportation Plan
Acknowledgements
Title Campbell County Transportation Plan
Date June 2003
Agency Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments James Q. Duane, Executive Director
Project Manager Robert Koehler, P.E.
Asst. Project Manager Andrew Johns, AICP
Administrative Assistant Regina Brock
Senior Accountant David Andres
We would like to express our appreciation to members of the Campbell County Transportation Task Force for the time and effort they have given to this process. We would also like to gratefully acknowledge Ms. Melissa Williams, Director of Administration for Campbell County for providing guidance throughout this project; Mr. Kevin Linn, Ms. Larisa Hughes, and Mr. Michael Schwartz of the Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission for providing consultation and assistance with GIS mapping and database preparation; Mr. Keith Logsdon and Mr. Brad Johnson of Wilbur Smith Associates for providing planning and engineering services; Mr. Bob Yeager and Mr. Bob Hill of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, District 6 for providing consulting; Mr. Winter Troxel of the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky for assistance with bus transit information; the City of Wilder for use of their facility for Task Force meetings; and, the Newport School District and the Campbell County School District for the use of their facilities for public meetings.
The following organizations have cooperatively financed the preparation of this document: the Federal Highway Administration, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Transportation Cabinet, and the Campbell County Fiscal Court. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the OKI Regional Council of Governments and are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
ADT Average Daily Traffic CCTTF Campbell County Transportation Task Force CMAQ Congestion Management and Air Quality CRF Critical Rate Factor DLG Kentucky Department for Local Government FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GIS Geographic Information System HIS Highway Information System ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act KYTC Kentucky Transportation Cabinet LMFC Locally Maintained Functionally Classified LOS Level of Service MOE Measures of Effectiveness NHS National Highway System NN National Truck Network OKI Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments PMT Project Management Team PRC Physical Roadway Characteristics TCSP Transportation and Community and System Preservation Program TEA-21 Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century TRB Transportation Research Board VPD Vehicles Per Day
GLOSSARY ERRATA
UNIFORM STREET ADDRESSING SYSTEM FOR UNINCORPORATED CAMPBELL COUNTY
In preparation for the consolidation of the Emergency Dispatch Centers for Campbell County and the Cities of Newport and Ft. Thomas into one Consolidated Dispatch Center, the Campbell County Fiscal Court identified a serious flaw in the present address numbering system used in the unincorporated area of the county, i.e. rural routes and box numbers. The use of rural route and box numbers is outdated and incompatible with a state-of-the-art dispatching process and leads to a great deal of confusion during police, fire, and other emergency responses.
In response to this problem, the Fiscal Court established a Readdressing Steering Committee. The committee worked at great lengths on this issue and developed a strategy to assist the County resolve this problem through a proposed unified readdressing system. Through the proposed unified readdressing system, ‘problem’ road names were identified, new names were proposed to replace the ‘problem’ road names, and a unified road numbering grid was been established.
A public meeting was held on January 27, 2003, at the Campbell County High School in Alexandria, Kentucky for the purpose of sharing the proposed unified readdressing system and soliciting public input on this matter. At the public meeting, Campbell County residents reviewed details of the proposed unified readdressing system and provided input into this proposal. Based on public input, the proposed street names were revised and a final listing was prepared.
The Campbell County Fiscal Court adopted this uniform addressing system by Ordinance O-8-03 on June 25, 2003. The effective date of the uniform street addressing system is August 1, 2003.
As a result of this uniform addressing system, some of the work conducted for this transportation plan had to be altered to reflect street name changes, new road numbering, etc.
A comparison of street names can be found on Appendix C.
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Study Purpose 1-1 Funding Sources 1-2 Planning in the Regional Context 1-2 Planning Process/Project Overview 1-4 Consultant Selection Process 1-4 Campbell County Transportation Task Force 1-5 Project Management Team 1-5 Government and Agency Input 1-6 Public Participation 1-7 Final Report Submission 1-9
CHAPTER 2 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
State and Federal Road Inventory 2-1 Locally Maintained Functionally Classified Road Inventory 2-6 County Road Inventory 2-8 Inventory Process 2-8 County Road Field Survey 2-8 Inventory Database and Mapping 2-9 Components of County Road Field Survey 2-10
CHAPTER 3 PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS
State and Federal Prioritization Process 3-1 County Road Prioritization Process 3-7 Scoring the Inventory 3-7 Physical Roadway Characteristics 3-7 Measures of Effectiveness 3-8 Ranking Process 3-9
TABLE OF CONTENTS CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 4 TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION
Transit 4-1 Bicycle and Pedestrian 4-2
CHAPTER 5 FINANCIAL STRATEGY
Current Funding Programs 5-1 State and Federal Roads 5-1 Transit 5-3 County Roads 5-3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 5-4 Prioritization and Programming Plan 5-5 Alternative Funding Sources 5-7
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS
Campbell County Transportation Task Force 6-1 County Road Inventory Maintenance 6-1 County Road Prioritization 6-1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6-2 Transit, Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation 6-2
LIST OF TABLES/CHARTS/FIGURES
TABLE PAGE
1 Level of Service Definitions 2-5 2 Campbell County Traffic Counts, 2002 2-14 3 Unscheduled Need List – Top Ranked Road Projects 3-4 4 State Roads to Consider For Future Unscheduled Need List 3-6 5 Top Twenty – County Maintained Roads 3-13 6. TEA-21 Kentucky Statewide Federal Authorizations 5-2 7. Top Twenty – County Maintained Roads, Cost Estimates 5-6
CHART 1 State and Federal Prioritization Process 3-2 CHART 2 County Roadway Prioritization Process 3-3
FIGURE 5-1 State and Federal Highway Needs – Statewide/Campbell County 5-2 FIGURE 5-2 Campbell County – County Road Projects 5-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
LIST OF MAPS MAP PAGE
1 State and Federal Roads, Level of Service, 2002 2-4 2 Accident Data State Roads 2-7 3 County Road Pavement Condition 2-12 4 County Roadway and Bridge Width 2-13 5 Estimated Traffic Volume 2-16 6 County Roadway Accident Information 2-17 7 State and Federal Highway Projects 3-5 8 County Roadway Needs Assessment 3-11 9 Priority County Roads – Top Twenty 3-14 10 Public Transportation 4-4 11 Bike Routes 4-5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Results From Round 1, Public Input Meetings Summary of Public Meeting Results Summary of Responses: Station B: Bike and Pedestrian Summary of Responses: Station C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Traveled Government and Agency Issues with Plans and Comments
APPENDIX B KYTC Highway Information System Information Highway Systems Geometric Characteristics Existing Traffic Characteristics Accident Segment Analysis Accident Spot Analysis Locally Maintained Functionally Classified Analysis
APPENDIX C Survey Form for Campbell County Transportation Plan County Road Scoring Guide for Field Survey Physical Characteristics Score Table (All County Roads) Measures of Effectiveness Scoring Guide Measures of Effectiveness Score Table (All County Roads)
APPENDIX D Composite Campbell County Project Table OKI TIP Kentucky Six-Year Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
OKI Plan OKI Needs List Kentucky Unscheduled Needs List 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update For Campbell County
APPENDIX E Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness, with Traffic Counts Presented By: Ranking and Alphabetically
TABLE OF CONTENTS CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Transportation improvements within the Northern Kentucky and Cincinnati area are coordinated through the planning efforts of the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI). The overall purpose of these efforts is to help assure that all modes of transportation are considered as the area prepares to meet future transportation and land use growth needs. The 2030 OKI Regional Transportation Plan, adopted in September, 2001 is the current plan for the entire OKI region which includes jurisdictions in Ohio and Kentucky. As part of their mission OKI also manages and coordinates many plans for specific jurisdictions, corridors, or transportation modes. This plan, The Campbell County Transportation Plan, has been prepared to address specific transportation needs within Campbell County, Kentucky.
There are sixteen political jurisdictions with Campbell County (fifteen cities, plus the Campbell County Fiscal Court representing the unincorporated portions of the county). Eight of the fifteen cities have their own planning commissions and comprehensive plans. Five cities plus the Campbell County Fiscal Court, representing the unincorporated parts of the county, share a joint planning unit known as the Campbell County & Municipal Planning & Zoning Commission. This joint planning unit also has its’ own comprehensive plan. The remaining two cities do not have a separate planning commission. Instead, these two cities handle planning issues administratively through their respective city councils.
This transportation plan is designed to provide more detail on transportation needs in Campbell County than those discussed in the 2030 OKI Regional Transportation Plan. This transportation plan has been prepared as an inclusive document for the entire Campbell County community. This transportation plan represents a more global perspective on transportation issues than the perspective offered in the individual comprehensive plans prepared for the various planning commissions within Campbell County. The global perspective is one in which the needs of the various cities and the county are looked at together and viewed as part of an interconnected system, both within the county and as part of the larger regional transportation system.
STUDY PURPOSE
Campbell County contains approximately 595 total miles of roads (118 miles of local streets1, 184 miles of county maintained roads, and 223 miles of state and federal roads). These roads provide the primary transportation needs for the approximately 89,000 residents (2000 U.S. Census) and many other users of these public roads. In 2002, upon request by the Campbell County Fiscal Court, the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI), serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Cincinnati-Northern Kentucky Region initiated this study of transportation needs within Campbell County, Kentucky.
1 Local streets were not included in this study
INTRODUCTION 1-1
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Four primary goals were identified from the outset of this planning process. The goals of this study and how they were implemented were:
Goal: Identify County-wide Needs on the State and Federal Highway System
Implementation: The Campbell County Transportation Task Force (CCTTF) identified, reviewed and provided local priority for the list of projects for the Unscheduled Needs List for state and federal roads serving Campbell County for OKI and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (See Chapter 3).
Goal: Identify Deficiencies on the County Owned Roadway Network
Implementation: Every county maintained road was surveyed and an inventory of existing conditions was prepared. Based on this survey the CCTTF in conjunction with the Project Management Team (PMT) prioritized county roads and developed a list of the top twenty road segments (See Chapter 3).
Goal: Identify Transit, Bike and Pedestrian Needs
Implementation: Existing plans and facilities for each of these alternative modes of transportation was reviewed. Recommendations were formulated that are intended to continue to incorporate these modes into the overall Campbell County transportation network (See Chapter 4).
Goal: Prepare a Financial Outlook
Implementation: Planning level costs and alternative program strategies for addressing roadway improvement needs have been identified (See Chapter 5). The plan also includes a series of "next steps" for consideration and action that are intended to implement recommendations in the plan (See Chapter 6).
Funding Sources
Funding for this project was provided by federal funds supplied by the Federal Highway Administration and KYTC through OKI, and by matching funds from the Campbell County Fiscal Court.
Planning In the Regional Context
The OKI region contains eight (8) counties located in three (3) states and contains approximately 1.8 million people. Campbell County contains approximately 89,000 people or approximately five (5) percent of the total population within the region. Campbell County is influenced by conditions that exist within the entire region. Transportation is one of the areas that is most influenced by conditions that occur outside of the county. OKI has conducted many planning studies to address transportation issues and several projects have been completed that have improved
INTRODUCTION 1-2
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN transportation conditions in Campbell County (e.g., the Fort Washington Way improvements, construction of the Taylor-Southgate Bridge). This transportation plan will also become a part of the regional context along with other plans that have been recently completed or that are currently underway.
The 2030 OKI Regional Transportation Plan is the primary policy setting document prepared and maintained for the entire region. It is the basis for many other more specific plans that serve to provide more detailed review and analysis of transportation issues. Following is a brief review of other planning projects conducted by OKI that are anticipated to most influence future transportation decisions relating to transportation services in Campbell County.
Eastern Corridor Study – This study is a review and evaluation of transportation alternatives for a broad area of eastern Hamilton and western Clermont Counties in Ohio and Campbell County. This area is experiencing rapid urban development that generates significant daily traffic volumes. Much of this traffic utilizes I-275 and I-471 in Campbell County as the preferred route to employment in downtown Cincinnati, Northern Kentucky and other locations to the west. These interstate corridors currently provide much more efficient travel than roadways within eastern Hamilton County. This study encompasses a multimodal approach, including highway improvements, transportation system management, expanded bus service, and rail transit to potentially alleviate traffic congestion within the interstate corridors by providing other alternatives within Hamilton and Clermont Counties. Any solutions realized that reduce traffic through the Campbell County portions of the I-275 and I- 471 will be beneficial to Campbell County.
I-71 Corridor, Phase II – This study, which covers the I-71 Corridor from Boone and Kenton Counties through Cincinnati and Hamilton County to southern Warren County, does not directly involve Campbell County. Campbell County, however, has already been benefited by the reconstruction of Fort Washington Way, as previously mentioned, which is part of this corridor. One element of this study, light rail transit, which has been identified as the preferred alternative for resolving issues along the corridor also includes a proposed route in Campbell County. The proposed light rail corridor in Campbell County would generally follow the corridors of I-471 and U.S. 27 and would terminate at U.S. 27 and the AA Highway in the City of Cold Spring.
Central Area Loop Study – This is a study of public transit needs within the urban core of Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky. Limits of the study include Central Parkway in downtown Cincinnati, I-75, I-471, the 12th Street Corridor in Covington, and the 11th Street Corridor in Newport. Employment, residential density and extensive public activity areas within the area provide excellent opportunities for increased use of public transit. Implementation of recommendations in this study are anticipated to provide significant benefit to Campbell County. Following is a brief description of major recommendations contained in the Central Area Loop Study:
INTRODUCTION 1-3
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Transportation System Management (TSM) – implementation of measures such as dedicated transit lanes, transit signal prioritization and other methods to increase use of existing public transit services,
Streetcar – further investigation of modern street rail service in downtown Cincinnati, Newport and Covington,
Fourth and Fifth Streets (Covington and Newport) – numerous changes, such as traffic signal modification, additional left turn lanes, restriping of lanes, and additional signage to decrease congestion and to improve mobility,
Veteran's Memorial Bridge – widening or replacement of this bridge that connects Newport with Covington over the Licking River at 4th Street in Newport, and,
Newport Light Rail Spur – further investigation of this potential connection through downtown Newport to connect with the proposed I-71 Light Rail line, previously discussed.
Other Plans and Projects - The recently completed Kenton County Transportation Plan and the 12th Street Improvement Project both have components beneficial to Campbell County. Road systems adjoining the two counties are important in providing regional connectivity. The TANK Strategic Plan, which includes Campbell County identifies strategies for increasing and improving transit services. In addition to daily bus routes TANK plans to continue to make systemwide improvements such as: park and ride lots, paratransit services, express service, and the Southbank Shuttle. More detail on TANK will be provided in Chapter 4.
PLANNING PROCESS/PROJECT OVERVIEW
Consultant Selection Process
Before the initiation of the Campbell County Transportation Plan, a Consultant Selection Committee (Selection Committee) was formed to select the most qualified and appropriate consultant to conduct the Plan. The Selection Committee comprised of six (6) members including: Judge/Executive Steve Pendery and Peter Klear from the Campbell County Fiscal Court, Greg Tully from the City of Newport, Bob Hill from KYTC, Andrew Johns from OKI, and Chuck Heilman from the Alexandria Community Business Association.
The Selection Committee met on Friday, March 22, 2002 to conduct their initial review and evaluation of the six proposals that were received. The Selection Committee then invited three finalists to make oral presentations on April 5, 2002. After careful deliberation the Selection Committee selected Wilbur Smith Associates to conduct the Campbell County Transportation Plan.
INTRODUCTION 1-4
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Campbell County Transportation Task Force
This plan has been prepared as an inclusive document for the entire Campbell County community. Preparation of this plan was guided by the Campbell County Transportation Task (CCTTF) and included a series of public meetings to seek input and comments from the general public, including residents, businesses and others.
OKI, in conjunction with the Campbell County Fiscal Court, assembled the Campbell County Transportation Task Force (CCTTF) to assist in the development of this plan. Participation on the Task Force brought together for the first time representatives from all local government jurisdictions and several agencies and organizations to work together on a county-wide project. Local governments involved were:
Alexandria Highland Heights Bellevue Melbourne California Mentor Campbell County Fiscal Court Newport Cold Spring Silver Grove Crestview Southgate Dayton Wilder Ft. Thomas Woodlawn
Other participants on the Task Force included: the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Northern Kentucky University, Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission, Alexandria Community Business Association, Campbell County Leadership Action Group, Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, Campbell County Industrial Authority, Southbank Partners, Progress with Preservation, Sanitation District No. 1, Northern Kentucky Water District, Northern Kentucky Realtors Association, Northern Kentucky Homebuilders Association, Tri-County Economic Development Corporation, Owen Electric Coop, and the Campbell County Cattleman Association. As part of the process several presentations were made by representatives from the cities and agencies to provide insight into issues faced by their respective groups. This is discussed in more detail later in this chapter.
The CCTTF met regularly throughout this project, beginning in April 2002 and extending through June 2003, to provide input to OKI staff and the consultant team, including identifying local road and transportation needs, making final recommendations on state and federal roads, county road priorities, and on the final plan document.
Project Management Team
Staff from OKI, had primary responsibility for the day to day management of this project. To further insure that the project moved smoothly and to assist with other decisions and recommendations regarding the project, a project management team (PMT) was
INTRODUCTION 1-5
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
organized. The PMT consisted of staff from OKI, the Campbell County Fiscal Court, the Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission and the consultant team. The PMT met monthly throughout the project.
Government and Agency Input
During the early part of this planning process all governments and agencies, participating on the CCTTF, were invited to present to the Task Force their issues regarding transportation project needs within their jurisdictions or that are otherwise important to serve their jurisdictions. Some governmental units participating on the Task Force chose to not make a presentation; however, each unit was supportive of the process. This proved to be a very successful venture which provided an opportunity for stakeholders to relate concerns, issues, and priorities to their peers. A comprehensive list of the issues identified is in Appendix A. The list includes a comparison of the projects to any plans that may already include the project, including this plan.
Following is a brief list some of the needs and issues identified.
City of Alexandria
• Completion of the KY 536 extension • Upgrade KY 547 from KY 10 to the AA Highway
City of Bellevue
• Improve KY 8 between Riverboat Row and Berry Avenue • Reconstruct the southbound exit ramp from I-471 to Route 8
City of Cold Spring
• Upgrade Pooles Creek No. 1 and add connection to Northern Kentucky University • New intersection tying East Alexandria Pike intersection with Murnan/Pooles Creek No. 2
City of Dayton
• Evaluate KY 8 from I-471 through the city (this includes the City of Bellevue)
City of Ft. Thomas
• Grand Avenue traffic management • East/west movement through city
City of Newport
• Reconstruct KY 9 along new alignment and connect with KY 8
INTRODUCTION 1-6
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
• New southbound I-471 exit ramp at KY 8/Cowens Drive • New bridge connection with Covington at Fifth Street • Improvements to Carothers Road/Grand Avenue • Construct a connector through the Cote Brilliante Redevelopment Area.
City of Southgate
• Concerns about impact of new development on U.S. 27 and Blossom Lane area • General traffic concerns throughout the city
City of Wilder
• Improve connectivity of city to surrounding areas • Extend KY 9 to Newport/KY 8
Campbell County
• Maximize efficiency of U.S. 27 and KY 9 (AA Highway) corridors • Improve east/west travel
Northern Kentucky University
• Improve Johns Hill Road • Construct a Technology Triangle/NKU access road between I-275/KY 2345 and Pooles Creek Road No. 1/AA Highway • Improved connectivity with community • Community centerpiece of culture, entertainment and education.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
A key component of the planning process was involvement of the public. The composition of the CCTTF was one method used to insure that a variety of views and needs were identified during the preparation of this transportation plan. In order to seek public input on transportation needs and comments on draft plan recommendation, the planning process included two (2) rounds of two (2) public meetings. These meetings were held at Campbell County High School in Claryville to provide accessibility to residents from southern Campbell County and at Newport High School to provide accessibility to residents from northern Campbell County. Each of these meetings was held using an "open house" format which allowed participants the opportunity to browse the materials and ask questions at their own pace over the course of several hours.
Notification of these meetings was an important factor in the success of the planning process. For each round of meetings a variety of methods was used to help insure that the public was informed about the dates, times and locations of them. Following are the methods of notification used for both rounds of public meetings:
INTRODUCTION 1-7
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
• Cable TV Stations – Each station serving Campbell County was supplied with information to be placed on their community bulletin boards/calendars. These ran continuously for at least two weeks prior to each meeting date.
• Newspaper – Advertisements were placed in the Campbell County Recorder and the Kentucky Enquirer/Kentucky Post.
• Websites – The OKI and Campbell County Fiscal Court websites were also used to distribute information and to notify the public of public meetings.
• Targeted Groups – To insure that a broad cross-section of the community was notified in accordance with environmental justice protocols, specific mailings were made to all individuals and groups identified through OKI's environmental justice coordinator. Additionally, mailing lists supplied by the Campbell County Fiscal Court were utilized. All groups, such as churches, schools, and other non-profit community organizations, that were included on the environmental justice mailing list were also asked to post flyers announcing the meeting, which were included in the envelop with announcement. Meeting notices were also provided to OKI Board of Trustee and Intemodal Coordinating Committee members.
• Campbell County Fiscal Court Announcements - The Campbell County Fiscal Court announced the meetings during their monthly televised meetings held prior to each of the public meetings. County Judge/Executive, Steve Pendery, issued press releases which resulted in several newspaper articles about the project.
Following is a synopsis of each of the public meetings, designated as Round 1 and Round 2.
Round 1 – Issues and Needs: Public meetings were held on November 18 and 21, 2002 to solicit input on transportation issues and needs in Campbell County. Over ninety (90) persons attended these meetings. Participants were provided with information in the form of handouts, and displays of maps were available that presented a variety of information from the inventory and analysis phase of this study (see Chapter 2). Each participant was provided with a questionnaire/survey designed to obtain input on transportation issues in Campbell County.
The questionnaire, which was completed by over half of the people (53 percent) that attended these meetings, asked for information/comments in the following subject areas: Multi-modal transportation (bus, rail, bicycle and pedestrian) and state and county roads. Each questionnaire included specific questions for response and also allowed for additional comments. Copies of the questionnaire and tallies of responses to the questions are included in Appendix A.
Round 2 – Comments on Draft Plan Elements: Public meetings were held on April 14 and 15, 2003 to solicit comments on the draft plan elements. Over fifty (50) persons attended these meetings. Like the first round of meetings, participants were provided
INTRODUCTION 1-8
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
with handouts and displays of the draft plan maps were available for review. Comment sheets were available and in addition, the OKI and consultant team staff, were available to answer questions and provide other information that might be requested.
FINAL REPORT SUBMISSION
To be completed after final adoption/approval of reports by OKI, Campbell County Fiscal Court and the Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission.
INTRODUCTION 1-9
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 2 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
A key element of this transportation plan is the acquisition and analysis of information on the conditions of existing roadways. This existing information provided a means by which conditions on each roadway could be evaluated and provided a basis for the prioritization of roads described later in Chapter 3. During this part of the planning process, information was collected on county, state and federally maintained roadways. Methodologies for gathering data on these roadways varied based on the availability of existing information and the data needs for each type of roadway. County road data needs required extensive on-site field work, while most data required for state and federal roads was available through the KYTC, Highway Information System (HIS). The HIS is a statewide inventory of data that is made available through KYTC for use in transportation planning. Data available from this source includes geometric information, traffic volumes, accident data, level of service, and others. Furthermore, data for state and federal roadways maintained in the HIS is compiled based on milepoints, which readily accommodates analysis based on smaller segments of the roadway. The state does maintain limited information on county roads. Information available for this study included data on all bridges over twenty (20) feet in length and accident data. Accident data is reported on a statewide basis by police departments and maintained in the state's HIS.
STATE AND FEDERAL ROAD INVENTORY
Not all state and federally maintained roads within Campbell County were inventoried as part of this study. Roadways selected were those that 1) provided connectivity between the county road system and major state and federal roads 2) served the largest population and employment areas 3) generated the highest traffic volumes and 4) served the urban growth area as designated in the Campbell County Comprehensive Plan. For most purposes these state and federal roads function as an extension of the road system in Campbell County and carry traffic primarily generated within Campbell County versus traffic passing through Campbell County for other destinations. The designated routes included in the analysis are as follows: Designated State and Federal Roadways KY 8 KY 1121 KY 9 KY 1997 KY 10 KY 1998 KY 547 KY 2238 KY 824 KY 2345 KY 915 KY 2924
In the decision making process, these designated state roadways are, at times, overshadowed by the larger state and federal roadways serving Campbell County which
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-1
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN include Interstates 275 and 471, US 27 and the portion of KY 9, known as the AA Highway, which extends from I-275 to the Campbell/Pendleton County line.
Characteristics of these designated routes in Campbell County are identified in the following sections. Included are transportation systems, geometric data, traffic conditions, and crash history. Features of the highways within Campbell County are summarized from the KYTC Highway Information System (HIS) database. Table summaries of this information are located in Appendix B.
Highway Systems
The various highway systems represented for the Campbell County designated routes are provided for additional information and are summarized in Appendix B. These include the State System, the National Truck Network (NN), the National Highway System (NHS), functional classification and truck weight class. The highway systems information is defined as follows:
State-maintained roads in Kentucky are classified into one (1) of six (6) categories under the State System, ranging from Supplemental Road to State Primary.
The National Truck Network includes roads that have been specifically designated for use by commercial trucks with increased dimensions (102 inches wide: 13 feet, six (6) inches high; semi-trailers up to 53 feet long; trailers up to 28 feet long – not to exceed two (2) trailers per truck).
The National Highway System (NHS) was established by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). It includes the Interstate Highway System and other significant principal arterial roads important to the nation’s economy, defense, and mobility. NHS routes in Campbell County include parts of KY 8 and US 27, and all of I-471 and I-275.
One (1) of 12 functional classification categories is assigned to each state- maintained road in Kentucky. These include rural and urban interstate, rural and urban principal arterial, urban freeway and expressways, rural and urban minor arterial, rural major collector, rural minor collector, urban collector, and rural and urban local.
A truck weight class is designated for the Kentucky state-maintained highway system as required by Kentucky Revised Statutes. With the exception of permits for over-dimensional or over-gross-vehicle-weight-classification-limit vehicles issued by the KYTC, Division of Motor Carriers, there are three (3) weight classification limits: 1) AAA – 80,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight; 2) AA- 62,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight; and 3) A – 44,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-2
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Geometric Characteristics
Geometric characteristics for designated routes in Campbell County, presented in Appendix B, include items such as the number of lanes, lane widths, shoulder widths, roadway type, and route speed limits. The geometric characteristics are used in the existing level of service and crash analysis and provided for additional reference. For additional information, selective geometric characteristics information is defined as follows:
Shoulder width is either a measure of the shoulder width in feet or designated as a curb and gutter section (i.e. Curbed) with no shoulder.
Roadway type can be one of three designations: couplet, divided highway, or undivided highway. A couplet refers to a pair of one-way streets.
Existing Traffic and Level of Service
Campbell County’s existing traffic and operational conditions, for the above designated routes, are listed in Appendix B. For this project, both existing (Year 2002) traffic volumes and level of service (LOS) have been identified and are discussed further in this section.
Existing traffic volumes (Year 2002) for select segments were summarized based on information provided in the HIS database. Existing truck percentages were determined for the study area routes using the HIS data and KYTC default values based on the functional classification of the segment. For the designated routes, traffic volumes range from a low of less than 200 vehicles per day (vpd) along KY 1121 up to 28,300 vpd along KY 8. Note that traffic volumes along the Interstate system and US 27 equal and in several cases far exceed the volumes along KY 8.
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure defined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB), and used to describe traffic conditions. Individual levels of service characterize these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six (6) levels of service are defined and are given letter designations from A to F. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and is described in general terms in Table 1.
Typically, a minimum of LOS D is acceptable in urban areas and LOS C in rural areas. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual provide guidelines on the analytical procedures for estimating LOS for streets and highways. For the Year 2002, LOS along the designated routes is acceptable except along KY 8 in the urban areas of Newport and Bellevue. LOS along the designated routes is shown on Map 1.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-3
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN STATE AND FEDERAL ROADS,
FOURTH LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS), 2002* PO 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N LEGEND E BELLEVUE W O C E V A D 1120PO H M LOS C or Better T 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A H S L LOS D 0T ER K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N D n H C F 1T T 1 t T LOS E o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M G C R A A S ou N D LOS F S n G t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
LE 0120.5 IL SV Miles OS EM E D *Designated routes are those identified for inclusion in this study. See Page 2-1 for further detail. MAP 1 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS
LOS Description
Represents the best operating conditions. Traffic is free flowing and drivers are A able to drive at their desired speed. Delays are minimal. Traffic flow is stable, but the presence of other vehicles in the traffic stream B becomes noticeable. Freedom to select a desired speed is not affected, but freedom to maneuver slightly declines. Delays remain minimal. Traffic flow is stable, but interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream begin to affect operations. Speed selection and maneuvering are affected by the C presence of other vehicles. Delays become noticeable and general levels of comfort and convenience decline noticeably as well. This represents high density, but stable, flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, but traffic flow remains high. Delays are more substantial D and intersection queues form frequently. Though driver comfort and convenience generally are poor, the utility or productivity of the facility is high. This is often considered to be the limit of acceptability for planning purposes in urban areas. Operating conditions are at or near capacity. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver is extremely difficult and driver E comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor. Delays approach an unacceptable level and operations are usually unstable. Oversaturated conditions exist when demand exceeds capacity, resulting in forced or breakdown flow. Operations are characterized by stop-and-go F conditions and are extremely unstable. Delays generally exceed limits of driver acceptability. Though undesirable, LOS F conditions are commonplace during peak traffic periods in major urban areas. Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual
Crash Summary
Crash data for the designated routes in Campbell County were considered for a three- year period from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2001. The location of crashes with valid milepoint designations, recorded in the HIS database, are shown by corridor segment and by spot (0.1 miles in length) in Appendix B to determine possible high crash locations. A spot location or segment of roadway is considered to have a high crash rate when the total crash rate is higher than the critical crash rate for similar roads in the area.
When a spot location or segment has a critical rate factor greater than one (1.00), it indicates that crashes at this location may not be occurring randomly. The critical rate factors are calculated on the methodology presented in the Kentucky Transportation Center’s Analysis of Traffic Accident Data in Kentucky (1995-1999). Accident Rate, Critical Rate and Critical Rate Factor (CRF) is defined as follows:
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-5
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Accident Rate – The accident rate is expressed in terms of annual accidents per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. The rate allows for comparison of accident history among roadways having different traffic levels.
Critical Accident Rate - A statistically derived accident rate developed for similar types of facilities throughout the state. A high accident location has an accident rate greater than the critical rate for that type of facility.
Critical Rate Factor (CRF) - A comparison of the accident rate to the critical accident rate: Accident Critical Rate Factor (CRF) = Critical As part of this process, each crash was classified into one (1) of three (3) categories based on the degree of severity: fatal, injury, or property-damage-only. During the period studied, there were six (6) fatal, 273 injury, and 735 property-damage-only crashes along the designated Campbell County routes. These are depicted on Map 2.
High accident segments were identified along KY 8, KY 10, KY 547, KY 915, KY 1121, and KY 2238. Smaller spot locations were located throughout Campbell County along the designated routes. These spot locations are identified with triangles on Map 2.
LOCALLY MAINTAINED FUNCTIONALLY CLASSIFIED INVENTORY
In addition, to the county, state and federal roadways reviewed, this study inventoried the Local Maintained Functionally Classified Roads (LMFC) within Campbell County. A LMFC Route is defined to perform to at a higher level than a local road and connect residential areas to commercial centers. By being designated as LMFC roadways and functionally classified as Urban Collector and Minor Arterial Streets, they are eligible for federal funding. The KYTC can assist with maintenance of a locally maintained functionally classified route.
As with the state and federal roadways, characteristics of the LMFC routes within Campbell County are identified in Appendix B. Included are transportation systems, geometric data, traffic conditions, and crash history. Features of the highways within Campbell County are summarized from the KYTC Highway Information System (HIS) database.
As seen in Appendix B for LMFC roadways, data from the HIS database is incomplete in some areas. Because of this fact, the calculation of LOS has been estimated and should be considered a preliminary planning level calculation. Future consideration of specific projects should be analyzed on a more detail level as needed.
Similar to the state and federal roadways, crash data were considered for a three-year period from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2001. During the period studied, there were no fatal, 61 injury, and 530 property-damage-only crashes along the designated
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-6
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN CRASH DATA ON DESIGNATED STATE ROADS*
(! (!FO *#(!(! (! URTH (! 8(! (!PO(! DAYTON (!(!(! !(!(*#!( D(!(! LEGEND L(! E(! I!(!(! F(!(!(! I(!R(! (!A(!(! (!(!F(! COVERT RUN (!(! S (!(! N (!(! E BELLEVUE (!(! W #(!(! O *C (!(! (! (! (! E FATALITY (! V (!A *#(! (!(!D 1120PO (! H M !( T !(!(!( 0 E (! (!(!(! M (! !((!(!H 1 (! !((!(!T T O (! (!(!( 4 S WOODLAWN (! (!(!W(! A R (! (!(!(! ! E I (!(!(!(!(!(! ( A (! #( S L (! * H T ER *# 0 HIGH VEHICLE CRASH SPOT K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N C D n (! TH F (!1 T
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n (! N O M G C R A A S ou N (! (! D (! INJURY S n G t RA y ND
(! (! S A (! K PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY C M M O O O O S H (! S T M O L T B F SOUTHGATE S R (! (! IV E (! R (! (! ¨¦§I-471 (! *#(! (! (!! (S Y (! R E (! E (! T G (!(! T H N R N (! E A I E L W ! M B ! (! (! I ( (! LE (!(! (! *#(!(! L (!(!(!(! IA WILDER R (!(! J *# T (! O (! S (! (!(! SILVER GROVE (! D (!(!SILVER GROVE H U (! U D (! (!(! N (! O (!(! N IN (! (! I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D (! S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS (! V (!(!(! E H S (! H O (! R L W (!(! I S (! (! L T O G # I (! Z * L T (! R Y A (! T 1998(! R (! (!! !( H ( ( E (! (! Y (! (! MELBOURNE(!(!(! S (! PO N (!(! I (! (! M L (! L (! (! (! G # * (! A (! Y (! H I N K L I ! (! (! (! ( U (! L I-275 S I !(K ¨¦§ (! (! (! #(!C 1 (! W *I (! (! # (! O L (!(! K K (! h E (! CRESTVIEW E E i R E E o (! R L C C I L S M R E(! L (! i K T L W (! R i c O NG N O (!(! H v NI O B O UN *#F(! G (! e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i (! T C PO P (! K K (! n (! E L R ! E E (! ( E R (! E g C W Y N R C O (! D E L D R R K N A (! L E L E A A !( i E IL (! E X H (! COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R (! E N r U IA (! N E (! I Y M N A (! R (! D (! MY (! (! ST H (! IC R G R E O (! I (! (! U S (! P C (! E B P (! N U K G L (! K R
(! R E G (! E
E E
L C R (! P S R A (! (! AN S E G M (! EIT K (! E R (! A W R S *# K (!M (! ! O I !(( U R ( (!(! L T (! P (! 915 K E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W (! (! L D E (! (! I *#(! W P E P E L (! O P (! O M L I I L L P T R E (! W L (! R A U Z R O US F A ER R (! F ND I FE (! D
(! (! G (! S T E (! T R (! O U (! ON N E (! ELS E S (! N H D (! O E (! L (! U L 547 S (! (! E G PO(! N I (! K C I (! (!(! (! L (! (!TO NEI (! LL TA SES (! GA N (! TE O (! G (!(! (! E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E (!(! (! R EW T Y VI (! E D E T R IL N I (!(!(!(! R RA E D (! G !( (! (! G (!(! (!!(! G K ( (! N E (! *#(!(! A C (! (!(! (! I (!(! R (! (! H (! (! E T (! (! L #(! (! F R * ! I ( PAINTE A R R (! L E P N M(! I
O (! (! (! A A P N I EY E N IL (! (! (!M (! RE F (! (! F (! (! E (!(! (! T (!(! P (! 9 S (! E (! ! O (! (! #(! R (! PO * A K S (!(! I (!(! (! M (! M (! J (! D ACE E O N EKTR O (! CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I (! M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E (! L G E D A A N A 536 A (! A N O (! H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R (! E (! S C PO A (! R (! H C
M R M E O A (! A A R (! L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N (! KE UR LLER LIC (! K GL LA I (! M C W M
W I M E
(! L A I S
O (! L S
L R (! (! H E C V G ! (! I R ( N E (! U (!N (!(!*# D I(! (! G E (! A K *#(! 10 T N O O R C (!(! I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M (! U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA (! E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N (! R LTO N MI Y B A E ! R L E ( R O K P Y S (! E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W (! E I E (! N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D (! S E O (! U O G E R
M S C D (! I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID (! PO O L S K (! (! A S K C *# N R C u A A A E P R (! R E T o L E (! P C (! H A (! IT C M R (! (! S
E 1121(! L IN G n A E V (! MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE ! A R S H ( AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H (!
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E A RRI B B (! A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS 0120.5 MO DE Miles E *Designated routes are those identified for inclusion in this study. See Page 2-1 for further detail. MAP 2 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
LMFC Campbell County routes. Because crash data for LMFC routes are not identified by milepoint, a detailed crash analysis could not be conducted.
COUNTY ROADWAY INVENTORY
The distinguishing feature of this plan over many that have been done up to this time within the OKI region is the emphasis on county maintained roadways. County roads in Campbell County were for the most part built to handle low volume "farm to market" type traffic. A shift toward more urbanized land use patterns has increased traffic on the county road system. Urbanization is characterized by lot and parcel sizes that are smaller than typical farms. Persons residing in these areas do not typically rely on agriculture as the primary source of income, but commute to work at other employment centers. Traffic demands and increased roadway usage resulting from this activity is placing increased maintenance and capacity burdens on the county which will result in financial impacts. Existing and future growth anticipated within Campbell County, the interest by city and county officials to effectively plan for future budgetary issues and decisions related to road maintenance and improvements is the focus of the plan.
The inventory and analysis of existing county roadway conditions provides the basis for the county road portion of this plan. The inventory/analysis of county roads and the development of a database, suitable for on-going update by the Campbell County Road Department is one of the important final products of this planning process.
Inventory Process
The inventory process included three (3) components. The county road field survey comprised the cornerstone of this effort. Traffic volumes and accident data comprised two (2) of the other components and the final component of the inventory was the development of the database and accompanying mapping of existing conditions.
County Road Field Survey
The county road field survey involved a process whereby a trained technician traveled each county road and observed its physical condition, measured bridge and pavement width, and recorded the components noted above. Digital photographs were taken to supplement field data.
Prior to embarking to the field for the survey, the consultant team, in conjunction with OKI and County Staff prepared the survey form. The first step in this process was the determination and verification of the data needed for this study, which is described above. Second, was the development of the form itself and field testing of the form to determine weaknesses in the form and/or data collection techniques. The field tests also assisted to determine how long the surveying process might take and the staffing needs.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-8
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Survey Form: A copy of the survey form and the County Scoring Guide for the field survey is included in Appendix C. The survey form was prepared using a database program. The program readily provided a format for paper copies of the form for field use. Data input is made simple because the same format as the printed version used in the field is viewable on the computer screen when data is transferred from field work to the computerized database. Finally, data is readily transported and adaptable from the database program to a GIS system, which has been used to prepare the mapping for this project.
Field Tests: The consultant team conducted field tests on approximately five (5) of the county roads. These tests were done to test the form, determine manpower needs for the survey, and to insure that survey staff was consistent when inventory items, primarily regarding roadway condition, required the use of subjective judgments. These tests were conducted by teams of two and three persons, including engineers familiar with roadway conditions and design standards.
Field tests indicated that one person could adequately conduct the survey. Consultant staff was then trained on the process. The survey of Campbell County Roads was conducted over a two week period in May 2002.
Field Survey: Campbell County maintains 183 total roads comprising approximately 184 miles of roadway length. To accommodate data analysis and future data maintenance, each county road was divided into segments. Segments were established along each road, as appropriate, using the following criteria:
• At intersections with other roads, • When road conditions changed significantly (e.g. paved to gravel, significant changes in width and/or pavement condition)
A total of 265 roadway segments comprise the final database developed for this plan.
Components of County Road Field Survey
The inventory of county roads entailed a survey of each county road and included the tabulation of information provided by KYTC and the Campbell County Road Department. During the field survey information was gathered on the following roadway components or characteristics:
• Bridge width (Bridge length and other information, such as weight limits and structure type, was provided from KYTC and Campbell County Road Department records.) • Road width • Road surface (asphalt, concrete, gravel, etc.) • Road condition (excellent, good, fair, poor) • Pavement markings and conditions • Median information
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-9
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
• Number of lanes • On-street parking • Shoulders • Sight distance • Vertical and horizontal alignment • Lateral clearance • Traffic control devices (stop signs, stop lights) • Lighting • Drainage
The county road pavement condition component, unlike all the other components, presented a challenge due to the fact that it involved a subjective judgment based on observation versus a measurement or observation. This component required each Murnan Road - Excellent person conducting the field work to be consistent in the judgment of roadway conditions. The following characteristics were used to generally guide the field classifications of road conditions:
Excellent - the entire roadway was free of visible problems and no repair was anticipated within the next several years.
Good – the majority of the roadway surface was in good Barrs Branch - Good condition, but was not required to be free of minor problems, such as some patching or edge of pavement damage. Major repairs to these roads were not required, nor likely to be required in the near future.
Fair – the roadway had problems that likely could be repaired without major resurfacing, but resurfacing would be an option. Upper Tug Fork - Fair
Poor – the roadway clearly had problems that required major repairs and resurfacing.
It should be noted that the above criteria is for road surface conditions only and the measurement did not take into account other deficiencies such as roadway width, which was evaluated Kennedy Road - Poor separately.
In addition, to these listed items, traffic count and accident information was collected from the previously described KYTC HIS database. Traffic count data from the HIS database was further supplemented by traffic counts conducted specifically for this inventory at selected key locations.
The following maps have been prepared from the data obtained during the county road inventory. All other components of the county road field survey are shown in Appendix C.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-10
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Map 3 – County Roadway Pavement Condition
This map presents the roadway conditions (excellent, good, fair, and poor). On this map color is used to identify pavement conditions ranging from poor to excellent. In this manner the roads most in need of attention are identified.
Map 4 – County Roadway and Bridge Width
This map uses color to indicate roadway and bridge width deficiencies. Roads that have bridges with less width than the adjoining roadways are also identified.
Traffic Volume and Accident Data
Traffic volume and accidents were other measures used to determine existing conditions. These measures are not direct components of the physical condition of the roadways. However, they provide a useful means for comparison so that roads with problematic physical conditions and higher traffic volume or accidents could be identified. Roads sharing these attributes would be indicative that attention should be given during the prioritization process, which is described in subsequent sections of this plan.
Traffic counts were conducted for over thirty (30) locations, where no reliable count data was available or was out of date. Most of these locations were on the county maintained road network. Additional traffic volume information was obtained from information available from the KYTC HIS. Table 2 shows the locations and traffic counts that were made especially for this study. Using the information on actual counts, both from the HIS and those taken for this study, volumes for all the county roads were estimated where counts were not available. This process entailed estimating what volumes should exists on those roads where traffic counts were not available based on counts from nearby and adjoining roads (see Map 5).
Inventory Database and Mapping
Completion of the county road field survey and the recording of all data into the database completed the inventory phase of the Campbell County Transportation Plan. In order to readily connect the database to a GIS system, as previously described, each road segment needed a unique and common field with the GIS database. For this purpose the official county road numbers established by the Campbell County Road Department was used. This database was then submitted to the NKAPC for development of mapping of inventory data. The NKAPC already maintains GIS data for Campbell County. This allowed the survey data to be easily integrated with the existing GIS base data to create mapping of inventory information.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-11
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN COUNTY ROAD PAVEMENT CONDITION
FOURTH OP 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N E BELLEVUE LEGEND W O C E V A D 1120OP H M T EXCELLENT 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A H RS L 0T E GOOD K 1 TH E GR e ARO A N ND n H C F 1T T
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H FAIR n N O M G C R A A S o N u D POOR S n G t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S OP N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S L M R E K i L W R T i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C OP P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E i A E L A E X I H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E T E E IL U OP C E T M
A E N R R A MU P E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E OP S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US
F A R R E F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G OP N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINT A ER R
L
P E
N I M O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R OP A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I I E N L E D A G A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E OP D T T B D
8 R E
S C OP A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L
I O E A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 OP N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T A O E U O M B A T U T P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y E B N I S SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VIS E A ALIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID OP O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121
G L IN n A E V MENTOR O OP MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A A e RIS O A R T B L G U W K R K D G G H O L IL IL L O LE H S KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S OP O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E ER R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L OP D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n S AC E u C R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H V d C IC E n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E MAP 3 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN COUNTY ROADWAY AND BRIDGE WIDTH
FOURTH PO 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N E BELLEVUE W O LEGEND C E V A D 1120PO H M T 0 E H 1 M ROAD WIDTH GREATER THAN 20 FEET T T O 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A H S L 0T ER K 1 TH E GR ROAD WIDTH 15 - 20 FEET e ARO AN N D n H C F 1T T
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M ROAD WIDTH LESS THAN 15 FEET G C R A A S N ou D S n G BRIDGE WIDTH LESS THAN ROAD WIDTH t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E MAP 4 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
TABLE 2 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRAFFIC COUNTS JUNE 2002
COUNTY 24 HOUR RD. COUNT LOCATION COUNT NUMBER CR1103 California Crossroad, N. of KY 10 826 CR1103 California Crossroad, E. of Wash. Trace 364 CR1208 Siry Road /Smith Hiteman 1551 CR1205 Craft Rd., East of US 27 334 CR1207A Parkside Drive, E. of US 27 502 CR1224 Pleasant Ridge, W. of KY 915 1580 CR1202 Lickert Rd., E. of US 27 1307 CR1206 Woeste Rd., S. of Lickert 246 CR1102 Dead Timber Rd., E. of AA Highway 117 CR1003 Grandview Rd., W. of KY 9 275 CR1003 Grandview Rd., E. of KY 10 723 CR1027 Poplar Ridge, N. of KY 9 1109 CR1027 Poplar Ridge, E. of US 27 5272 CR1375 Enzweiler Rd., E. of US 27 302 CR1304 E. Alexandria Pk., N. of US 27 6357 CR1024 Upper Tug Fork, E. of E. Alexandria Pk. 673 CR1O22 Lower Tug Fork, W. of KY 547 416 CR1033 Eight Mile Rd., E. of KY 547 773 CR1033 Eight Mile Rd., W. of KY 8 849 CR1011 Fender Rd., W. of KY 8 396 NA Poole's Creek #1, E. of KY 9 3971 CR1349 Dry Creek Rd., E. of KY 9 456 CR1350 Murnan Rd., N of KY 9 404 CR1350 Murnan Rd., W. of US 27 1025 NA Dodsworth Ln., N. of E. Alex. Pk. 4036 CR1316 Dodsworth Ln., S. of KY 8 1068 CR1312 Uhl Rd., S. of Dodsworth Ln. 1002 CR1312 Uhl Rd., W. of KY 547 638 NA N. Ft. Thomas Ave., S. of Clover Ridge 3344 CR1330 Covert Run Pk., W. of N. Ft. Thomas Ave. 1552 CR1207A Golf Course Entrance, E. of US 27 479 NA US 27, 200' N. of Golf Course Entrance 13411 NA US 27, 200' S. of Golf Course Entrance 13030
Source: Wilbur Smith Associates, Traffic Counts, 2002
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-14
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Accident data for county maintained roads, as previously mentioned, is maintained by the KYTC HIS. This data, however, is not tabulated by milepoint like those that occur on state and federal roads. This results in the inability to identify accident locations within a particular road segment for county maintained roads.
Map 5 – Estimated Traffic Volume
This map presents information from traffic counts obtained from specific counts conducted for this study, the KYTC HIS, and traffic count estimates made for roads where no counts were available from either source.
Map 6 – County Roadway Accident Information
This map uses color to identify roads with the highest number of accidents.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2-15
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN ESTIMATED DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME*
FOURTH PO 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S LEGEND N E BELLEVUE W O C E V A D 1120PO Greater than 75000 H M T 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A 50000-74999 H S L 0T ER K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N C D n TH F 1 T 20000-49999
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M G C R A A S N 10000-19999 ou D S n G t RA y ND 5000-9999
S A 2500-4999 K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F 1000-2499 S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R Less than 1000
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI 0120.5 SS MO Miles E DE *Traffic volume estimates based on KYTC 2002 traffic count data and actual counts per Table 2. MAP 5 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN COUNTY ROADWAY ACCIDENT INFORMATION*
FOURTH PO 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N E BELLEVUE W O C LEGEND
E V A D 1120PO H M T 0 E H 1 M T T O 0-5 Accidents 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A H S L 0T ER K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N 6-20 Accidents D n H C F 1T T
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M G GREATER THAN 20 Accidents C R A A S N ou D S n G FATAL ACCIDENT t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
LE IL SV OS EM 0120.5 D Miles E *Accident data from KYTC Highway Information System for 1999 - 2001 MAP 6 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 3 PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS
The prioritization of roadway needs is the most important element of this transportation planning process. The process utilized for prioritization involved broad based input from the cities in Campbell County and the Fiscal Court through their representatives on the CCTTF. Input from community residents gained during public participation activities was also factored into the prioritization process. The flow of the inventory and prioritization process is graphically depicted on Chart 1, State and Federal Roads and Chart 2, County Roads. For state and federal roads the prioritization provides a concensus from all local government jurisdictions in Campbell County to OKI, KYTC and the Kentucky Legislature who provide or recommend funding for these improvements through the KYTC Six-year Plan.
Prioritization of county roads will provide the Campbell County Fiscal Court with guidance regarding where County resources should be applied. It will provide the various Planning Commissions in the county with a basis for determining the timing and extent of improvements to require or recommend during the approval process for new land development projects.
STATE AND FEDERAL PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
The planning process for this plan also included the review and prioritization of state and federal roads that serve Campbell County. Together, these roads and the County maintained roadway system serve the transportation needs of the Campbell County community. Planning for state and federal roadway improvements is conducted under the auspices of the KYTC and OKI, with input from local governments and the public. The CCTTF conducted a comprehensive review of the 2003 – 2008 KYTC Six-Year Plan, adopted in 2002, and OKI Plan projects, along with the Kentucky Unscheduled Needs list projects.
The Unscheduled Needs List identifies and prioritizes projects that currently have not been identified for funding, but may proceed to the KYTC Six-Year Plan and OKI Plan to be adopted in 2004 in the future if funding sources are identified. Table 3, identifies the highest ranked roads on the Unscheduled Needs List. Projects on this list are note identified by priority. For reference purposes, a composite list of projects and the various plans in which they are included is presented in Appendix D. Map 7 shows all the state and federal projects on these lists, including those on the Unscheduled Needs List. Committed projects (programmed) and proposed projects (non-programmed) on this map are identified by the programming status (programmed or not programmed) and by priority (high, medium and low). Programmed projects are those with funds identified, non-programmed funds are projects without an identified source of funds.
Unlisted Projects: Generally, roadway improvements will not occur until roadway projects go through the OKI review process to be included on the Unscheduled Needs List and then to the KYTC Six-Year Plan, OKI Plan and
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-1
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHART 1 STATE AND FEDERAL ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-2
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHART 2 COUNTY ROADWAY PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-3
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
TABLE 3 UNSCHEDULED NEEDS LIST TOP RANKED ROAD PROJECTS
ESTIMATED ROUTE DESCRIPTION COST* (Millions)
I-471 CONSTRUCT NEW I-471 SOUTH BOUND OFF RAMP AT KY 8 7.80 RECONSTRUCT FROM RIVERIA DR TO HALLAM AVE IN KY 8 9.10 BELLEVUE. INCLUDES INTERSECTION AT RIVERIA DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION FROM KY 1892 (CAROTHERS RD) TO KY 1120 US 27 (11TH STREET). INCLUDES SIDEWALKS ON THE EAST SIDE OF 8.35 US 27 RECONSTRUCT EAST ALEXANDRIA CONNECTOR FROM US 27 KY 709 3.50 TO AA HIGHWAY US 27 RECONSTRUCT INTERSECTION AT KY 1120 (11TH STREET) .90 US 27 RECONSTRUCTION FROM I-471 TO KY 1892 (CAROTHERS RD) 13.55 RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING OF JOHNS HILL RD FROM KY 2345 MARTHA LAYNE COLLINS BLVD TO I-275. INCLUDES REROUTING 3.80 OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE FROM NUNN DRIVE TO KY 2345 KY 547 RECONSTRUCT FROM KY 10 TO NEW SECTION AT AA HIGHWAY 23.50 NEW CONNECTOR FROM BRIDGE OVER RR (MP 21.643) TO KY 8 KY 9 7.00 NEAR THE 4TH STREET BRIDGE IN NEWPORT AA HIGHWAY - ADD RIGHT TURN LANE FOR SOUTHBOUND KY 9 KY 9 .10 TO KY 709 KY 9 AA HIGHWAY - MAJOR WIDENING FROM I-275 TO US 27 27.00 MAJOR WIDENING FOR 2 ADDITIONAL LANES (6 TO 8 LANES) I-275 40.00 FROM AA HIGHWAY TO OHIO STATE LINE EXTEND PROPOSED POND CREEK RD FROM US 27 TO AA KY 536 HIGHWAY VIA PORTION OF KY 10/KY 1997 CORRIDOR (NEW KY 35.00 536) NEW NKU ACCESS ROAD BETWEEN I-275 AND KY 9 (AA NEW 10.20 HIGHWAY) I-471 WIDEN THE SOUTHBOUND I-471 RAMP TO WESTBOUND I-275 9.00 NEW BIKEWAY (SHARED USE TRAIL) FROM PENDRY PARK KY 8 2.10 THROUGH MELBOURNE AND SILVER GROVE RECONSTRUCTION WITH NEW BRIDGE OVER LICKING RIVER KY 536 18.30 FROM KY 177 TO KY 1936 (POND CREEK RD)
Source: Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Council of Governments, with input from Campbell County Transportation Task Force * Estimates are from KYTC for the 2002-2003 Unscheduled Needs List
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-4
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN STATE AND FEDERAL HIGHWAY PROJECTS
I-471 at KY-8 Redesign ramp and add one lane
KY-8 OP 8 Realign from 3rd Street KY-8 LEGEND to Bridge over Licking Improve intersection and add one lane from Riviera Dr. to Hallam Ave. IMPROVEMENT TO EXISTING ROAD KY-8 New Road 4th Street Bridge add three lanes From 10th St. to south of Caruthers Rd. NEW CONNECTION 1120 OP US-27 KY-9 Reconstruct from I-471 to Taylor PROGRAMMED New two-lane alignment along Southgate Bridge Lowell and connection to KY-8 K e n t NOT PROGRAMMED o n I-471 HIGH PRIORITY
KY-9 C Major widening from US-27 Rehab from KY-1632 to o to Ohio State line Newport city boundary u n NOT PROGRAMMED t y MEDIUM PRIORITY US-27 Reconstruct intersection at Overlook Drive NOT PROGRAMMED I-471 LOW PRIORITY Widen south bound Ramp KY-1632 to west bound I-275 ¦¨§I-471 Reconstruct and realign
KY-2238 I-275 Widening from KY-9 to Add two lanes from AA to Ohio I-275 overpass
KY-2345 Reconstruct and widen John's Hill Road from M.L. Collins to I-275 Reroute University Drive. 1998OP New Bridge From KY-16/177 to KY-9 ¦¨§I-275 East Alexandria Pike O h Reconstruct from US-27 i to Cline Elementary o I-275 R Add two lanes from I-75 to AA iv KY-547 e OP9 Reconstruct from Silver r Grove to AA New Technology Triangle/ KY-1998 NKU Access Road Reconstruction and add climbing KY-8 L Stabilization and reconstruction i lane from US-27 to AA c from Dayton to Pendleton County k i n g New Bridge R ive Connect AA to CSX Ind. Site r KY-709 Reconstruct from US-27 to AA 915 KY-9 OP 1997 Add two lanes from OP Enzweiler Rd. I-275 to US-27 Terminate intersection with AA
KY-915 Reconstruct from KY-2924 to KY-9 OP547 KY-547 US-27 Add climbing lane from Add 2 lanes from 1.0 mile south of AA to KY-10 KY-10 to I-275
KY-536 New Connection from KY-9 to KY-8 KY-536 AA Reconstruct from Additional signing KY-1936 to KY-915 OP9 and lighting
KY-536 OP536 New two-lane Connector OP8 KY-536 Reconstruction from KY-177 to Pond Creek and new bridge
10 US-27 OP Widen to 5 lanes from Parkside to 1.0 miles south of KY-10 KY-1121 Reconstruct/realign and upgrade to collector from KY-10 to KY-824 US-27 New alignment
y t 824 n OP u utUS 27 o
C 1121 n OP o t
n US-27 Ke Widen to 5 lanes from KY-154 to Parkside
1936OP KY-824 Reconstruct/realign and upgrade to a collector from KY-1121 to US-27
OP154 y nt ou C on let nd Pe
0120.5 Miles E MAP 7 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Transportation Improvement Program when funding is identified. In addition to the roads included on the various lists heretofore presented, there are several roads that have been identified through this planning process that should be considered for inclusion in the future. Currently, data on these roads does not indicate that under current conditions improvements are necessary, however, projected traffic, (see Appendix B), and the location of these roads within the urbanizing area of unincorporated Campbell County indicates that conditions on these roads should be monitored. As development continues to occur and traffic flow continues to increase the level of service on these roads can be anticipated to decline. Table 4, lists state maintained roadways that should be monitored. This table includes a brief description regarding the justification for including roads on this list.
TABLE 4 STATE ROADS TO CONSIDER FOR FUTURE UNSCHEDULED NEEDS LISTS
SEGMENT ROUTE ROAD NAME COMMENTS DESCRIPTION Will provide access from new KY 536 into KY 10 KY 10 KY 1997 to KY. 547 Alexandria and will serve the Urban Service Area. KY 1121 (Persimmon Provide east/west mobility and serves A.J. KY 824 Race Track Road Grove Road) to US 27 Jolly Park Provides parallel route to US 27 and US 27 to KY 536 (Pond KY 915 Licking Pike serves new development near the Creek Road) Campbell County High School Provide parallel route to US 27, will serve Persimmon Grove KY 824 (Race Track KY 1121 the Urban Service Area, and will connect Road Road) to KY 10 to new KY 536. US 27 to KY 915 Provide potential alternate route from KY 2924 Tollgate Road (Licking Pike) Alexandria to Wilder/AA Highway.
Other Roads to Consider: In Chapter 2, state and federal roadways were evaluated to identify capacity and safety concerns. Of these designated roadways, six (6) were found to have safety concerns as indicated by a critical accident rate factor greater than one (1). The roadways identified and a description of the high accident segments is as follows:
• KY 8 – Newport and Bellevue area; Fort Thomas area • KY 10 – From KY 915 to Alexandria/KY 1121 • KY 547 – Lower Tug Fork to Silver Grove • KY 915 – US 27 to KY 536 and Rifle Range Road to KY 9 • KY 1121 – Shaw Hess Road to Barrs Branch Road • KY 2238 (Three Mile Road) – US 27 to KY 2345 (Johns Hill Road)
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-6
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Of these only a small portion of KY 8 in Bellevue is identified as a high priority roadway on the Unscheduled Needs List (see Table 3). The others were either identified as low or medium priority or omitted entirely. A portion of KY 915 and KY 1121 are listed on Table 4 as roads to watch due to anticipated future development. Each of these roadways should continue to be monitored in the future. If above average critical rate factors continue, these roadways should be considered for inclusion on the Unscheduled Needs List as higher priority projects.
COUNTY ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
The prioritization process for county roads included several components, as follows:
• The inventory of physical conditions and the mapping of those conditions as previously described; • Input from the public on issues and needs; • The development of scoring procedures and mechanisms for the inventory (physical characteristics) and for other characteristics that would identify the importance of improvements to each road and potential positive or negative impact that those improvements would have on the community (measures of effectiveness); traffic volume information: and, • Input from the Project Management Team (PMT) and the Campbell County Transportation Task Force (CCTTF) that resulted in the final roadway priorities.
Scoring the Inventory
Development of a scoring system involved numerically scoring each component of the inventory (e.g., road surface, road condition) by its corresponding unit of evaluation. For example, road surface conditions were identified as excellent, good, fair or poor. Numerical values were given based on the highest value for the worst condition. In the case of road surface conditions, a poor road received the highest point total of four (4) and a road with excellent surface conditions received the lowest point total of one (1). Appendix C includes the scoring guide for each of items of data identified on the road survey form.
Physical Roadway Characteristics (PRC)
The inventory data when combined with the scoring for each unit of evaluation item resulted in a composite score for each county road in Campbell County. Roads with the highest total score indicated that those roads were in the most need of physical improvements. The outcome of this process resulted in a straightforward ranking of the roads with the greatest physical needs. Appendix C includes the physical roadway characteristics table for all county roads within Campbell County. This table shows each road element surveyed and its corresponding score from the scoring guide, which is also included for reference in Appendix C.
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-7
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Measures of Effectiveness (MOE)
The measure of effectiveness scoring, which represents a unique methodology to quantify subjective values, was developed to measure the extent to which improvements made to a road would positively or negatively impact the function of the road. Four (4) evaluation criteria were utilized in the scoring process. The scores assigned within each of these categories were weighted based on a preference survey completed by the CCTTF. The purpose of this survey was to determine which of these categories was most important for the Campbell County community. The CCTTF determined that Safety and Community Development and Economic Vitality issues were most important and those scores are, therefore, weighted or given higher point totals than Environmental Impacts and Multimodal/Intermodal Enhancement. Appendix C includes the measures of effectiveness scores for each county road. Following is a description of each scoring category.
Safety: The safety score was based on accident information. Roads where accidents occurred received points based on the number of accidents. Additional points were added to that score when accidents resulted in injuries. If a fatality occurred further points were added. In this category higher scores indicate greater need for improvements.
Community Development and Economic Vitality: Points in this category were awarded in three categories related to the impact that road improvements would have on the urban service area, cities or population clusters, business or industrial districts, or improve access to the major road system. This final category is important because a primary purpose for the county road system is to provide access to major roads that serve the county and region. The major road system (e.g., U.S. 27, AA Highway) comprised of state and federal roads, is more capable of handling high traffic volumes, at higher speeds, and provides more efficient access to shopping and employment centers.
Environmental Impacts: Scores in this category address the impact on the natural environment and on historic and cultural features that may occur as the result of roadway construction. Information used to develop these scores included the review of maps to ascertain what portion of a road may be located within an area where construction activity would likely impact the environment. For example, when roadways closely followed streams or passed through steep terrain, it was assumed that improvements would impact these land forms. Three rating categories were used to distinguish environmental impacts – positive impact, no impact, negative impact. All roads received a score under this category, except those with twenty (20) feet of pavement width, which comprises the standard, or routes that were rated excellent in regards to pavement condition, wherein it was deemed that improvements likely would not be necessary during the period of this plan. For roadways where improvements were anticipated to have positive environmental impact, points were added to the total measures of effectiveness score. When
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-8
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
improvements were anticipated to have negative environmental impact, points were subtracted from the total measures of effectiveness score.
Multimodal/Intermodal Enhancement: This score is based on whether roadway improvements may include or enhance modes of transportation other than the single occupant vehicle. For example, if the improvement would enhance connectivity to other modes or would likely include design elements for pedestrians (e.g., roadway improvement projects through residential or commercial areas were assumed to include sidewalks) points were added under this category.
Ranking Process
The inventory and scoring process results, described above, provided a complete view of each county roadway in regards to physical characteristics and the anticipated effects of roadway improvements on the Campbell County community. The next phase in the planning process entailed ranking and prioritizing each road using the combined scores from the physical characteristics and measures of effectiveness.
Physical Roadway Characteristics/Measures of Effectiveness/Traffic Volume
The first step in the ranking process was the combining of physical roadway characteristic scores and measures of effectiveness scores for each county road. The scoring system developed for each of these categories was based on the highest score being indicative of the most physical need or the most beneficial impact resulting to the community from improvements. Therefore, the addition of each of these scores for each county road would effectively result in a score that compared physical needs with the measure indicating the benefit of improving each road. Tables in Appendix E present these combined scores in two formats. One format is by the ranking of the total score (physical characteristics + measures of effectiveness + traffic score) and the other format is by alphabetical order of the road name.
Up until this point in the ranking process, traffic volume had not been used as a measure of either physical condition or as a measure of effectiveness of improvements. Traffic volume is not directly either a physical attribute of the roadway or a measure of how effective improvements might be toward meeting anticipated future purposes of a roadway. Information on traffic volume is, however, an important part of the prioritization process because it indicates the current level of use of roads. Traffic volumes on existing roads, therefore, are used as an indicator of need and public benefit of investment.
Traffic volume and the corresponding traffic scores are included along with the physical characteristic score and the measure of effectiveness score on the tables in Appendix E. Traffic volume, expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) was scored as follows:
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-9
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
ADT Score 0 - 499 0 500 – 999 1 1000 - 2499 2 2500 - 4999 3
5000 + 5
The score derived from traffic volume are included as part of the total score for each road found in the tables in Appendix E.
Map 8, County Roadway Needs Assessment, presents information from the combined scores for physical characteristics, measures of effectiveness and traffic volume for every county road in Campbell County. Data from the tables presented in Appendix E has been tabulated into high, medium, low and minimal categories to depict the level of need for each road. Scoring ranges for each of these categories is as follows:
Needs Assessment PRC/MOE/Traffic Category Scores High 50 to 73 Medium 40 to 49 Low 32 to 39 Minimal 0 to 31
Prioritization of All Roads Reduced to Top Twenty Roads
The Tables presented in Appendix E, show the ranking of all 183 roads in Campbell County that are maintained by the Campbell County Road Department. The development of these tables, based on scoring criteria previously described, represented only the first step in the process of prioritizing the county roads. When these lists were completed and presented for review by the PMT and CCTTF, several questions arose. Many questions related to why certain roads did not rank higher and why some ranked higher than anticipated.
It was determined by the PMT that while the scoring process served as a very useful tool, further review and evaluation based on local knowledge of the roadways was necessary. Furthermore, it was determined that it was not feasible to evaluate in great detail all 183 county maintained roads. Therefore, the PMT determined that for the remaining portion of this evaluation, the list of roads to be considered in greater detail needed to be refined.
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-10
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN COUNTY ROADWAY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
FOURTH 8 PO DAYTONDAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N COMPONENTS OF ASSESSMENT LEGEND E BELLEVUE W BELLEVUE O C E V A Physical Characteristics: D 1120PO H M Information such as road and bridge width, pavement condition, HIGH T 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWNWOODLAWN sign and traffic control devices, and on-street parking was A R W I E A H S L MEDIUM 0T ER gathered by surveying each county maintained road. K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N D n H C F 1T T 1 t T LOW o W NEWPORTNEWPORT FORTFORT THOMASTHOMAS H Measures of Effectiveness: n N O M G C R A Each road was evaluated based on the extent to which A S ou N D improvements made would positively or negatively impact MINIMAL S n G t RA accidents, community and/or economic development, connectivity y ND to major road systems or potential to enhance other modes of transportation. S A K C M M O O O SOUTHGATE O S H SOUTHGATE S T M O L T B F S R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R WILDERJ T O S
D SILVER GROVE H U SILVER GROVE U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N MELBOURNE I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEWCRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H v COLDCOLD SPRINGSPRING N A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E E T ILE U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRAN N B ALEXANDRIA CH LICK O E ALEXANDRIA R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N CALIFORNIA LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V O PO MENTOR R G MENTOR
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W Ke R K D G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E MAP 8 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
This process of refining the road list for more detailed evaluation and prioritization began with the selection of the twenty-five (25) roads from the PRC/MOE process, with the highest scores. This list was then further expanded based on input from PMT members, County Staff and KYTC, District 6 staff who were familiar with roads in Campbell County. In total, forty (40) roads were selected for more detailed consideration. In some cases only a segment of a road was selected.
The PMT reviewed each road within the top forty selected by considering in more detail the specific environment and use or anticipated future use of each. In effect, this evaluation was a more detailed analysis of the measures of effectiveness and related directly to specific benefits that improving roads would have for the county's residents. This refinement resulted in Table 5 which lists the top twenty (20) roads with descriptions that indicate which portions of the roads are designated as high priorities. Map 9, Priority County Roads - Top Twenty, shows the geographic location and distribution of these road segments.
CCTTF Review and Approval
The priority list of top twenty roads and the prioritization process was reviewed by the CCTTF. The CCTTF recommended approval, without change, and this list and accompanying map (Map 9) were included in the presentations at the final public meeting for review and comment by the general public.
This list along with the information contained in the appendices, can be used by city and county officials to guide decisions regarding roadway improvements during budget preparation and for decisions related to future land use and development along existing county roads.
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-12
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
TABLE 5 TOP TWENTY - COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADS
Segment Rank Road Name Length Description (miles) 1 Barrs Branch 1.4 Persimmon Grove Road to KY 10 2 Lickert Road 1.7 US 27 to Persimmon Grove Road 3 Woeste Road 0.6 Race Track Road to Craft Road 4 Pleasant Ridge 2.0 Visalia Road to S. Licking Pike 5 East Alexandria Pike 0.9 US 27/AA Connector to Low Gap Road 6 California Crossroad 1.2 KY 10 to Washington Trace 7 Burns Road 1.8 Flatwoods Road to KY 1121 8 Eight Mile Road 1.8 KY 547 to KY 8 9 Siry Road 3.1 US 27 to Burns Road 10 Dry Creek Road 1.5 AA Highway to Murnan Road 11 Pleasant Ridge 4.7 Clay Ridge to Visalia Road 12 Poplar Ridge 1.4 City Limits to Upper Tug Fork 13 Murnan 0.4 Pooles Creek No. 2 to US 27 14 Clay Ridge Rd 1.1 Hissem to KY 1936 15 Craft Road 1.5 East of US 27 to Shaw Hess 16 Dodsworth Lane 1.3 City Limits to KY. 1998 17 Upper Lick Branch 0.8 Grandview to AA Highway 18 Upper Tug Fork 1.7 East Alexandria Pike to Reitman/Poplar Ridge 19 Woeste Road 1.7 Craft Road to Lickert Persimmon Grove Road to Persimmon Grove 20 Shaw Hess Road 1.1 Road
Source: Campbell County Transportation Task Force, 2003
PRIORITIZATION OF ROADWAY NEEDS 3-13
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN PRIORITY COUNTY ROADS - TOP TWENTY
FOURTH PO 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S N E BELLEVUE LEGEND W O C E V A D 1120PO H M T PRIORITY ROADS AND RANK 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWN A R W I E A H S L 0T ER URBAN SERVICE AREA* K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N D n H C F 1T T
t 1 T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M G C R A A S N ou D S n G t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A 16
T 1998 R ³ ‚ H E Y MELBOURNE S PO N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E E i E E o R R L C C I L S M R E L i K T L W R i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r 13 P U i C ³ ‚ T PO P K K n E L R E E 8 R E E g C W ³ ‚ Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H v 10 N A M C V K N R I ³ ‚ D e R E N r U I N E A I Y COLD SPRING M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M O 5 I R U T
L ³ ‚ 915 K P E 18 T E
E ³ ‚ IL U PO C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E R B N 1997 U T H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L 12P T R E W L ³ ‚ R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y 17 VI E D³ ‚ E T R IL N I R RA E D G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINTE A R R L E P N M I O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P E 9 S O R PO A K S I M
M E J 1 D AC E O ³ ‚ N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M 2
W I M
³ ‚ E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G E 6 A K T N 10 ³ ‚ O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 PO N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T O MA E U A O B T T U P C N H 20 I I U S G O E D N B ³ ‚ H E 19 IN S
³ ‚ C R W D N R ILTO N E M 4 Y B A R O L E ³ ‚ R K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R 15 S D VISA E A LIA C ³ ‚ O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R 3E W N C ³ ‚ R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S RK C N C u A A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121 L IN G n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W 7 Ke R K D G ³ ‚ G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O 9 RY E
³ ‚ I S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A AN NG K M E E E R R IT 14 N
F H ³ ‚ A I H E 11 E IT G 154 E G ³ ‚ L M D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F E I I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E *Urban Service Area extends from the city limits of the City of Alexandria MAP 9 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 4 TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION
It is important for Campbell County to include planning for alternative modes of transportation and to begin implementing, whenever possible, the inclusion of facilities and accommodations for alternate modes within the overall framework of transportation and land use planning within the County. OKI has undertaken several planning initiatives emphasizing alternative modes of transportation as one solution to address congestion and resulting air pollution concerns, including the OKI Regional Bicycle Plan and The Central Area Loop Study. Alternative modes have a potentially significant role in reducing congestion and addressing environmental concerns related to roadway improvements.
Land use planning initiatives also have an important role in the support of transit, bicycle and pedestrian planning. Connectivity between land uses and abutting developments is important for the establishment of a more efficient and effective transportation system. The intent of connectivity is to provide alternate routes that allow and encourage traffic/pedestrian flow via local streets and sidewalks other than using the major street system. Communities are positively impacted through reductions in travel time, energy cost savings, and emissions reduction. Land use planning should include support for development characteristics that support transit, bicycle and pedestrian access where appropriate.
TRANSIT
Bus transit Services in Campbell County and Northern Kentucky are provided by the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK). TANK operates more then 130 buses throughout the three county region on both regular and express routes. Regular daily scheduled bus service is provided to the entire urban area of Campbell County from Alexandria north to Newport. Express Service extends further south to Grants Lick where a Park and Ride lot exists. Today in Campbell County, TANK ridership currently exceeds 1.2 million rides per year. TANK has experienced a thirteen (13) per cent increase in ridership, largely related to new non traditional methods of service such as reverse commute and smaller circulators in recent years. Two of these services are the Southbank Shuttle( May 1998) which circulates between Newport (serves the New Newport on the Levee Entertainment Complex), Covington and Cincinnati; and the DayTripper Program (March 1999) which is a demand responsive service designed to address service needs in areas where traditional fixed route services are not the most efficient solution. These services meet the needs of those living and visiting the area. Park and Ride lots provide a major source of ridership for TANK. Currently there are five (5) Park and Ride locations in the County.
TANK's most current plan, the Strategic Plan and Report to the Community, prepared in 2001, identifies several initiatives that relate to future transit service in Campbell County. This plan supports initiatives of TANK's Strategic Plan and those in the Central Area Loop Study, which include:
TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION 4-1
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
• The development of additional park and ride lots, • The development of the Newport Transit Center, • Continuing the Southbank Shuttle Daytripper and Regional Area Mobility Program (RAMP) paratransit service, and • Partnering with the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA) on initiatives such as light rail transit.
Map 10, Public Transportation, identifies existing and proposed public transit facilities in Campbell County. In addition to the programs and services identified in the TANK plan, this plan identifies "Major Transit Corridors" that are intended to serve future transit needs in the County by providing necessary linkages east/west and north/south. These linkages are planned to provide access, via limited stops, to major destinations, such as employment centers, throughout Northern Kentucky and the Cincinnati region. This plan also identifies future park and ride lots and proposes that existing park and pool lots (e.g., lots where commuters meet to share rides to work) along the AA Highway be considered for conversion to park and ride lots. Use of these lots may be indicative that ridership may be available to support transit service from these locations.
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
The OKI Regional Bicycle Plan identifies recommended and alternative but not recommended routes for bicyclists along existing roadways (see Map 11). This information provides guidance to bicyclists regarding road conditions, such as traffic volume and terrain conditions including steep or long hills. Additional and more detailed bicycle and pedestrian planning in Campbell County is best addressed on the individual project level. In the case of pedestrian facilities many sidewalks are included as part of new subdivision development.
Forward Quest, through the Quest River Path Committee is planning a forty (40) mile bicycle and pedestrian path along the Ohio River, generally following the route of Kentucky Route 8 from Pendery Park in Campbell County through Boone County. The first leg of this route from Pendery Park to the City of Melbourne has been funded. The second leg is being planned to extend to the City of Silver Grove. Pedestrian portions of this route will utilize existing and planned walkways through the cities of Dayton and Bellevue and along the City of Newport's River Walk. The conversion of the L&N Bridge, renamed the Newport Southbank Bridge, to a pedestrian and bicycle only facility provides a connection from the City of Newport to Cincinnati.
This plan supports the current and ongoing efforts within the cities of Newport, Bellevue and Dayton regarding riverwalks and other pedestrian facilities along the Ohio and Licking Rivers, including planning for improved connections across the Licking River. The plan also supports the efforts by NKU to enhance pedestrian transportation on its campus and to the adjoining and nearby community. Furthermore, this plan encourages the continued emphasis on providing sidewalks or other means of non-
TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION 4-2
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN vehicular transportation, as part of new commercial, professional office, and residential development.
It is also recommended that the County in conjunction with the cities consider preparing a county-wide bicycle plan. The plan should include identification and evaluation of appropriate routes and improvements for safe access to destinations (e.g., parks, schools, employment centers). The KYTC Pedestrian and Bicycle Policy adopted in 2002 directs the Cabinet to consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities whenever new highway projects are being planned. One criteria used during this consideration are recommendations of local plans. As a result, the preparation of a local bicycle plan that is specific to Campbell County and the cities will provide the basis for implementing the KYTC policy. In addition to identifying routes to specific destinations the plan should address other elements necessary to encourage additional bicycle use. Elements that encourage bicycle use include: parking facilities, bus racks, bicycle safety and motorists awareness programs, and signs that identify designated routes.
TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION 4-3
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
FOURTH 8 Proposed Transit Center PO DAYTON
W D LEGEND L A IE F R IR D A F T COV A ERT RUN S N Y E L BELLEVUE W O PROPOSED I-471 LIGHT RAIL O R C E I V -4 A 71 D 1120PO H M T 0 WOODLAWN E 1 WOODLAWN M EXISTING PARK AND RIDE LOT " %H T T O 4 S CHESA A PEAKE R W I E A S N L TH 0 ER E K 1 TH G E R W e RO A N "A N C D n H M F 1T T
t 1 A T o W NEWPORT H NEWPORT N PROPOSED PARK AND RIDE LOT % n N O M G C R A A S o E N L D u KY E TUC C FORT THOMAS n KEN T S R GR t I A y C ND EXISTING PARK AND POOL TO PARK AND RIDE #
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O EXISTING TANK BUS ROUTE L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R PROPOSED MAJOR TRANSIT CORRIDOR
S Y R E E T G I T H N - N R I 4 A I E - E 7 L 1 4 W M B I 71 LE
C
O L A N I WILDER R J N T O S SILVER GROVE D SILVER GROVE H U U EC D N O N IN I D S % V T E H S H O R W O L I S L T O I R Z G L T
N R Y A
T R O 1998 H E Y MELBOURNE T MELBOURNE S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PO N HIGHLAND HEIGHTS I M L L N G A Y H I
E N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ K C 1 W I # O L K K h E CRESTVIEW E " E i E E o R R L C C I L S L M R E K i L W R T i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C PO P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E A A i E IL E X H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I # R D e R E N r U A I N E A I Y M L E N A % R X D A N MY ST D H IC R G R R E O I U S P I A C E B P N U
K G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S
R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I R U L T 915 K P E T E E IL U PO C E T M
A E N R R A MU P E N T R B 1997 U H NA A E N Z N G E PO S W E L D
I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L " L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US F A ER R F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U N N E ELSO E S N H D O E # U L S L 547 E G PO N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R RA E D G G A G I N K E
A C R R I
H D E
T
L N F I R PAIN A TE A R R
L
X E P
N % M I E O A A P N L I EY E N IL M RE F A F E T P 9 S E O R PO A S K I M
M J D "E O AC E N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A 536 A A N A N O H J N R E PO D T T B D
8 R E
S C PO A
R C H
M R M E O A A A R L
J B R I L O E I A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE R R K AU LLE LIC GL L I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I N R E U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA O N N US 27 P LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T A O E U O M B A T U T P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y S E B N I SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VISA E A LIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID PO O L S K A S K C N R A C u A A E P R R E T o L E P C H Under ConstructionA IT C R SM " E 1121
G L IN n A E V MENTOR O PO MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W D Ke R K G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S PO O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E A R B B R A N IN K A G M E E E R R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L PO D I
R OLF y S t W P F I E I n SC AC E u
R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H VE d C IC n -R e N L R P A A G M W E E L I D R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E MAP 10 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN BIKE ROUTES
FOURTH OP 8 DAYTON
D L IE F IR A F COVERT RUN S LEGEND N E BELLEVUE W O C E V A D 1120OP RECOMMENDED H M T 0 E H 1 M T T O 4 S WOODLAWN W A R E I A ALTERNATE H RS L 0T E K 1 TH E GR e ARO AN N D n H C F 1T T 1 NOT RECOMMENDED t T o W NEWPORT FORT THOMAS H n N O M G C R A A S N BIKE PATH ou D S n G t RA y ND
S A K C M M O O O O S H S T M O L T B F S SOUTHGATE R IV E ¨¦§I-471 R
S Y R E E G T T H N R N E A I E L W M B I LE
L IA WILDER R J T O S SILVER GROVE U D SILVER GROVE H U D N O N IN I HIGHLAND HEIGHTS D S V HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
E H S H O R L W I S L T O I Z G L T R Y A
T 1998 R H E Y MELBOURNE S OP N I M L L
G A Y H I N K L I U L I-275 S I K ¨¦§ C 1 W I # O L K CRESTVIEW K h E E E i E E o R R L C C I L S L M R E K i L W R T i c O NG N O H v NI O B O UN F G e R I k P B L G A E 9 I r P U i T C OP P K K n E L R E E R E E g C W Y N R C O D E L D R R K N A L E L E i A E L A E X I H COLD SPRING N v COLD SPRING A M C V K N I R D e R E N r U I N E A I Y M N A R D MY ST H IC R G R E O I U S P C E B P K N U G L K R
R E G E
E E
L C R
P S R A AN S E G M EIT K E R
A W S R K
M
O I U L T 915 K P ER T E E IL U OP C E T M
A E N A MU P R R E N T R B 1997 U H NA A E N Z N G E OP S W E L D I P E P W E L O P O M L I I L L P T R E W L R A U Z R O US R F A ER F ND I FE D
G S T E T R O U ON N E ELS E S N H D O E U L S L 547 E G OP N I K C I L TO NE LL TA ISES GA N TE O G E IL BRANC N B ALEXANDRIA H LICK O E R EW T Y VI E D E T R IL N I R A E D R G G G N K E
A C R I
H E
T
L F I R PAINT A ER R
L
P E
N I M O A A P N I EY E N IL M E F R F E T P 9 S E O R OP A K S I M
M J D ACE E O N EKTR O CRE R N R M R E R G RY H E Y C IC B I M R H N W R O O M C I D R N R V W T E N I N I E L G E D A A N A 536 A A N O H J N R E OP D T T B D
8 R E
S C OP A
R C H
M R M E O
A A A R L
J B R I L
I O E A Y
H A H I N RT N E N KE UR LLER LIC K GL LA I M C W M
W I M E
L A I S
O L S
L R H
E C V G I
R E N U N D I G
E A K 10 T N O O R C I CALIFORNIA US 27 OP N N LI M U ut T X A H R DO B R P D R T A O E U O M B A T U T P C N H I I U S G O E D N B H E IN S C R W D N R LTO N MI Y B A E R L E R O K P Y E B N I S SE H B O L O A W G L L W E I E N R H T H O
P F E A S R S D VIS E A ALIA C O D R W S D S E O U O G E R
M S C D I T A H I y R E W N C R KOE t T A HLER S 824 O N E G IF n A ID K OP O L S A S K C N R A C u A A E P R R E T o L E P C H A IT C R SM
E 1121
G L IN n A E V MENTOR O OP MENTOR R G
E
A L o T L S E t F HILLVIEW B n H F E F AR P L Z L A RIS A O A R T B L G U W D Ke R K G G H O IL ILL L S O LE H KE R P PARKLA D S BE A R S H AB A CH I S D N W ANIELS
G 1936
G S OP O IRY E S R T KE Z EC IV S D OR N R W KENTON STATION U IS B H
Y L R IL BOONE SMITH I H S BO M YD NU H Y E BA B RRI A N N R K A G M E E E E R IS R IT N F H A I H E E IT G 154 L M E G D S L OP D I
R OLF y S t W P F I E I n S AC E u C R o E H H C E G G n ID R o R R t Y O le LA H V d C IC E n -R e N L R P A A G M W E L E D I R P V LU L O M L G C I F R N E H I E N K N N I H O R F IS T F SE L O I M E Y M R G NE LA IR FA MUINN
A U L I C K
E LL VI SS MO DE 0120.5 Miles E MAP 11 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 5 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
As discussed in the previous chapters, a number of factors were involved in developing the Campbell County priority needs and recommendations. The implementation of any project recommended from this study is dependent upon the availability of funds. This Chapter evaluates current and potential funding program's ability to address identified needs.
CURRENT FUNDING PROGRAMS
Funding for statewide highway improvements is predominantly provided through Kentucky’s Road Fund and the Federal Highway Trust Fund. The majority of highway projects constructed in Kentucky are built with federal highway funds; however, the state’s present policy is to provide the matching funds for federal-aid highway projects on the state-maintained system. Projects not on the federal or state system will require local funds to be implemented and maintained unless alternative funding sources are utilized.
The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), described in more detail below, provides federal budget legislation. TEA-21 is a six-year program set to expire on September 30, 2003. Specifics of the new program are still being developed by the federal government. For up-to-date information on the progress of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) maintains a website (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reauthorization/index.htm) that is regularly updated to provide the latest information. Once the reauthorization process is complete, it will be beneficial to review the new Act to identify new programs and changes to existing programs applicable to the transportation needs of Campbell County. For the following discussion, federal funding dollars are based on the existing TEA-21 program.
State and Federal Roads
As stated above, funding for statewide highway improvements is predominantly provided through Kentucky’s Road Fund and the Federal Highway Trust Fund. There are five main federal transportation funding sources as defined in the approximate $218 Billion TEA-21 Program. The Interstate Maintenance (IM) Program is designated for the maintenance and rehabilitation of Kentucky’s Interstate highways. The National Highway System (NHS) Program funds improvements to the 163,000 miles of designated NHS urban and rural roads, which includes the interstate system, a number of principal arterials, the defense strategic highway network, and strategic highway connectors. The Surface Transportation Program funds can be used for any Federal- aid highway, including the NHS, bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and public bus terminals and facilities. A small portion is reserved for rural minor collectors, not included above. Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation funds can be used on eligible bridges on any public road. Finally, the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Program provides a flexible funding source
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-1 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN to Kentucky and other states to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. TEA-21 authorizations for each program are provided in Table 6.
At the state level, state and federal roads in Campbell County share funding on a statewide basis through the KYTC Six-Year Plan. As previously described for Campbell County, there are many identified, but unscheduled needs for highway projects. Generally, projects proceed from identification to the Unscheduled Needs List, prior to being included within the Kentucky Six-Year Plan. Statewide there is approximately $45 billion of identified needs. As shown in Figure 5-1, the KYTC Six-Year Plan currently only FIGURE 5-1 programs $4.7 billion. Furthermore, (Adapted from KYTC) the Six-Year Plan identifies funding using four categories of project development – planning, design, right-of-way/utilities, and construction. The total Six- Year Plan funds, therefore, do not relate directly to project construction. Many identified projects that are listed within the Six-Year Plan are not fully funded within a single planning cycle.
TABLE 6 TEA-21 KENTUCKY STATEWIDE FEDERAL AUTHORIZATIONS
Six-Year Total Program Authorizations Interstate Maintenance $23.8 billion National Highway System $28.6 billion Surface Transportation $33.3 billion Program Bridge Replacement and $20.4 billion Rehabilitation Congestion Mitigation and $8.1 billion Air Quality
Campbell County's current portion of the Six-Year Plan is $67.7 million. Identified needs within Campbell County equal $862.2 million. As a result there is an approximate
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-2 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
$800 million shortfall of funding resources to identified project needs for state and federal roads within Campbell County alone.
Transit
As described in Chapter 4, funding for the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) is heavily subsidized by the three Northern Kentucky Counties (Boone, Kenton, and Campbell). In FY 03, the three counties contributed $11,331,527 of the $14,551,620 annual operating budget. The balance came from ridership revenues and state and federal funding provided by Kentucky’s General Fund and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds. TEA-21 authorization for transit was approximately $41 billion nationally. Two main programs exist as part of TEA-21, Formula Grants and Capital Investment Grants. The Formula Grant Program is approximately half the authorized funding, and is apportioned using three statutory formulas defined for urbanized areas, non-urbanized areas, and special needs of elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities. In addition, small set-aside programs exist as part of the Formula Grant Program including the Clean Fuels Program intended for promoting the use of low emissions equipment. The Transit Capital Investment Grants and Loans Program has $18 billion authorized nationally. This can be used as capital assistance for new fixed guideway systems, extension and modernization of fixed guideway systems, and bus and bus related facilities.
Funding for the Northern Kentucky Transit System (TANK) is heavily subsidized by the three Northern Kentucky Counties (Boone-Kenton-Campbell). TANK uses a formula that relates to the population that is located within one (1) mile of bus routes (2000 data) to request the needed funding. In FY 03, the three counties contributed $11,331,527 of the $14,551,620 annual operating budget. Passenger revenues only accounted for $2,690.896 of the revenues. Other significant revenue was for Special Events $30,959, RAMP Program $46,435, Advertising on Buses $271,497, State fuel refund $96,935 and interest $78,371. The capital budget includes both local and federal funds for bus replacement.
County Roads
Over the past four fiscal years, the budget for Campbell County Road Department has averaged $1.6 million. The majority of the $1.6 million budget is used for basic maintenance of the present county road system, safety improvements, and the administrative expenses associated with these services. In the past four years, the road budget has included funding to repave 10 to 12 road miles per year which has been contracted out. As part of this plan, $59.1 million worth of county road improvements have been identified for the top 20 prioritized roads (see Figure 5-2). It should be noted that this estimate is the cost for construction only, and does not include estimated cost for design, right-of-way acquisition, and utility relocation. These improvements are further described later in this chapter. Distributing this estimate over 27 years to year 2030, would create a need of $2.2 million per year for new construction, above and beyond the normal county road budget to be able to "improve" the areas recommended
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-3 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN in the plan. Presently, the county does not have a capital budget that puts aside dollars for capital improvements for roads. Capital budget items for the road department in the last few years have been limited to equipment replacement. In reviewing the Campbell County Road Budget it is readily apparent that funding does not exist today to fund the identified improvements in this plan. New funding will need to be identified to undertake the needed improvements. In addition, it is noteworthy that as the county continues to develop and add new FIGURE 5-2 (Adapted from KYTC) roads to their county road inventory, the incremental cost of operations and maintenance of the system will increase.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Several programs are provided through TEA-21 to plan, develop and maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities. For example, $270 million was provided for the creation and maintenance of recreational trails as part of the Recreational Trails Program, and $3.8 billion was provided for Transportation Enhancements. Established as a 10% set-aside of the Surface Transportation Program, the Transportation Enhancements Program offers communities the opportunity to provide safe bicycle and pedestrian facilities, scenic routes, and beautification to their communities. The following websites can be referenced for additional information on the Transportation Enhancements Program: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/te.htm http://www.kytc.state.ky.us/Multimodal/TE.htm.
The Recreational Trails Program is administered though the Kentucky Department for Local Government (DLG). It provides funding for acquisition, construction and maintenance for both motorized and non-motorized recreational trails. Funding is available to cities, counties, and non-profit organizations and is based on a 50/50 local match. About $700,000 was available through this program in fiscal year 2002. The Recreational Trails Program has an advisory committee that makes recommendations to the Commissioner of DLG.
The Transportation and Community and System Preservation Program (TCSP) is a grant program established as part of TEA-21 to address the relationship between
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-4 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
transportation, community, and system preservation and private-sector initiatives. States, local governments, and Metropolitan Planning Organizations are eligible for funding. Projects accepted include:
• Planning and implementation strategies that work to improve transportation efficiency; • Reduction of transportation environmental impacts; • Reduction of future infrastructure investments; • Promotion of efficiencies and access to jobs, services, and trade; and • Examination of public private-sector development and investment patterns.
For additional information of the TCSP program, refer to the following website: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tcsp/index.html.
As stated previously, once the reauthorization process is complete, it will be beneficial to review the new legislation to determine programs applicable to the bicycle and pedestrian needs of Campbell County.
PRIORITIZATION AND PROGRAMMING PLAN
Given the preceding analysis and considerations, twenty (20) county roadways or roadway segments were identified as priorities for future improvement. Table 7 displays the construction cost for these improvements. Costs were presented for three improvement categories. First, each priority segment/roadway was evaluated on the need to repave the existing facility. As part of the Campbell County road field survey, each facility’s pavement condition was evaluated. If the condition was rated as poor or fair, the cost to repave the facility was calculated. Of the twenty (20) priority segments/roadways, portions of seven (7) were rated fair or poor and repaving cost estimated totaling $2.3 million.
Secondly, the cost to conduct minor widening along the facility was evaluated. Minor widening is defined as improving the roadway to a recommended roadway width without completely reconstructing the facility to standard design guidelines. Recommended roadway width is 25 feet for local urban streets, 30 feet for urban collector streets, and 22 feet for all rural county roadways. The objective in conducting a minor widening would be to avoid significant costs associated with increasing shoulder width, adding sidewalks, significant earth movement, utility relocation, and right-of-way acquisition.
The geographic terrain along several of the priority roadways create difficulty in conducting minor widening on a roadway segment and meeting the above objective. In several cases, the PMT group felt given the anticipated benefits in comparison to overall construction costs, the roadway/segment could be fully reconstructed for a similar cost to conduct minor widening. Based on this reasoning process, minor widening cost were calculated for only six (6) of the priority roadways/segments. Total cost to conduct minor widening on these facilities is $5.0 million. Cost estimates do not include planning, design, right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation, if needed.
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-5 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Finally, full reconstruction costs were calculated for all twenty (20) priority facilities. Cost for full reconstruction is estimated to be $59.1 million (see Table 7) The total Planning level costs were derived for rural roadways based on recommended guidelines contained in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 and for urban roadways based on the Campbell County Subdivision Regulations. The following basic assumptions were used in estimating costs:
• Urban: 25 feet (local) or 30 feet (collector) roadway width; curb and gutter; 4-foot sidewalk each side; and street lights. • Rural: 22 feet roadway width and 4-foot shoulders on both side of the roadway. • Estimates were made for earthwork, structures, signage, and maintenance of traffic.
The above analysis provides a range of estimated, planning level costs anticipated to address the Top 20 Priority Projects. The three improvement categories presented are to show order of magnitude relationships. Although not specifically addressed, spot improvements could be undertaken as money becomes available or as an immediate need arises. More detailed cost estimates for spot improvements, repaving, minor widening or full reconstruction should be evaluated on a case by case basis. Further evaluation of the specific improvements being considered should help to determine the type of improvement needed given the available funds and project need.
ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES
Recognizing that the scale of transportation improvements required to meet the needs identified as part of this Plan greatly exceed current resources, the following funding mechanisms could be explored. As described above, the transportation project needs far outweigh the current funding levels. With the federal funding levels and language of the TEA-21 Reauthorization Bill unknown, but anticipated to not increase significantly, the need to identify alternative funding sources becomes increasingly important, particularly at the local level.
There is a wide range of potential sources for revenue that can be applied to transportation improvements. These involve mostly the public sector, but there is opportunity for private sector participation in a number of the funding alternatives. Some of these sources are currently unavailable for use in Kentucky and Campbell County but are include here for information and discussion only. Several alternative funding sources to be considered include:
• Local motor vehicle fuel tax – this would be applied as a flat rate per gallon tax at Campbell County gasoline stations, and would require enabling legislation at the state level.
• Vehicle registration fees – vehicle registration fees are made up of a variety of fees and taxes imposed by most states on vehicle owners as part of the
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-6 Table 7 Top 20 - County Prioritized Roads Cost Estimates
Project Management Team Existing Existing Construction Cost Segment Length Co. Rd. # / Segment # Road Name Rural/ Urban Pavement Roadway Width (miles) Rank Priority Condition (feet) Repaving1 Minor Widening2 Full Reconstruction3
1 High CR1100/10-30 Barrs Branch4 1.4 Urban Good 18 N/A N/A $4,000,000 2 High CR1202 Lickert Road4 1.7 Urban Good 18 N/A $1,200,000 $4,000,000 3 High CR1206/10-20 Woeste Road 0.6 Urban Fair/Good 13-19 $86,000 $330,000 $1,100,000 4 High CR1224/40 Pleasant Ridge 2.0 Urban Good 18 N/A $1,180,000 $4,500,000 5 High CR1304/10-20 East Alexandria Pike 0.9 Urban Good 25 N/A N/A $1,600,000 6 High CR1103/40-50 California Crossroad 1.2 Rural Good 18 N/A $610,000 $800,000 7 High CR1121/20-30 Burns Road 1.8 Rural Good 17 N/A N/A $2,300,000 8 High CR1033 Eight Mile Road 1.8 Rural Good 18 N/A N/A $2,000,000 9 High CR1208/10-20 Siry Road 3.1 Rural Fair/Good 16 $645,000 N/A $4,500,000 10 Medium CR1349/10-20 Dry Creek Road 1.5 Urban Fair 15-17 $370,000 N/A $4,000,000 11 Medium CR1224/10-30 Pleasant Ridge 4.7 Rural Good 18 N/A N/A $7,000,000 12 Medium CR1027/10-30 Poplar Ridge 1.4 Urban Good 18-23 N/A $800,000 $2,700,000 13 Medium CR1350/30 Murnan 0.4 Urban Good 18 N/A N/A $1,000,000 14 Medium CR1217/50-60 Clay Ridge Rd 1.1 Urban Good 16 N/A N/A $2,700,000 15 Medium CR1205/20-30 Craft Road 1.5 Urban Good 16 N/A $890,000 $3,400,000 16 Medium CR1316/10-20 Dodsworth Lane 1.3 Urban Fair/Good 18 $248,000 N/A $3,400,000 17 Medium CR1004 Upper Lick Branch 0.8 Urban Good 16 N/A N/A $1,800,000 18 Medium CR1024/10-30 Upper Tug Fork 1.7 Rural Fair/Good 13-17 $302,000 N/A $1,800,000 19 Medium CR1206/30 Woeste Road 1.7 Urban Fair 16 $404,000 N/A $3,800,000 20 Medium CR1126/20 Shaw Hess Road 1.1 Urban Fair 16 $258,000 N/A $2,700,000
TOTALS $2,313,000 $5,010,000 $59,100,000 * Shading denotes that higher priority is given to these segments than to other segments of the same route shown further down the list. 1) A repaving cost was calculated when the roadway or a segment of the roadway was found to be in poor or fair condition based on the Campbell County Road Survey. Cost are based on repaving the existing roadway width. 2) Minor widening costs were calculated based on the ability to upgrade the roadway to a recommended roadway width without incurring significant costs associated with increasing shoulder width, adding sidewalks, earth movement, utility relocation, and right-of-way acquisition. For urban sections, the recommended width was 25 feet for local streets and 30 feet for collector streets. For rural roadways, the recommended width was 22 feet. Cost are based on improving the road to these minimum widths with no additional upgrades to the roadway. No estimate is shown where the above objectives were difficult to meet and project cost would approach the cost to complete full reconstruction. This does not indicate that spot improvements would not be feasible for portions of the roadway; however, cost for spot improvements were not evaluated as part of this study. Cost estimates do not include planning, design, right-of-way acquition, and utility relocation phases of work. 3) Full Reconstruction costs were calculated for each roadway. Planning level costs were derived for rural roadways based on recommended guidelines contained in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 and for urban roadways based on the Campbell County Subdivision Regulations . The following basic assumptions were used in estimating costs: Urban: roadway width as defined in note #2, curb and gutter, 4-foot sidewalk each side, and street lights. Estimates were made for earthwork, structures, signage, and maintenance of traffic. Rural: roadway width as defined in note #2 and 4-foot shoulders. Estimates were made for earthwork, structures, signage, and maintenance of traffic. Cost estimates do not include planning, design, right-of-way acquition, and utility relocation phases of work. 4) Barrs Branch and Lickert Road were assumed to be urban collector streets with all others assumed to be local urban or rural roadways. CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
vehicle registration process. This fee application would be applied as a fixed rate increase on the existing vehicle registration fee and would require enabling legislation at the state level.
• County sales tax – in addition to Kentucky’s current sales tax of 6%, an increase of 1%, for example, would be imposed on buyers producing an increased sales tax income on merchandise, luxury items and certain other taxable services. An increased sales tax would require enabling legislation at the state level.
• Accommodations tax – the accommodation tax is a tax applied to all guest room rates and is in addition to the 6% sales tax. This tax increase would be applied as a fixed rate increase. Most likely, the recommended accommodation tax increase would be one or two percent.
• Local occupational payroll tax – Campbell County currently assesses a tax on all business payrolls within its jurisdiction. An increase of this payroll tax could be considered. Campbell County is currently limited to a one (1) percent payroll tax under Kentucky Revised Statutes and enabling legislation may be necessary to increase this tax to a level that would be effective for use in maintaining roadways.
• Special property owner assessments – transportation improvements can be financed through the creation of a special benefit assessment district, in which property owners that directly benefit from a transportation improvement (in the form of increased property values and earning potential) are required to fund all or part of the improvement. Enabling legislation is available for cities at the state level, however, new legislation would be required in order to create such districts within unincorporated Campbell County.
• Development impact fees – this type of fee has been established in order to assign at least part of the cost of transportation improvements to land developers who, in turn, create much of the need for these improvements.
• Utility fees – these fees are charged for each housing unit and business to help pay for various public utility services, such as water, sewer, waste disposal, drainage, electricity, natural gas and transportation. This fee application would be applied as a fixed rate increase on top of the existing utility fees. Enabling legislation may be necessary to utilize these fees.
• Parking fees – throughout Campbell County, parking rates vary by community and parking facility. An increase in parking fees would need to be evaluated on a county-wide basis to determine significant revenue generators, if they exist. There may not be enough income from parking fees to warrant the increase.
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-8 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
• Public-private partnerships – this category of funding covers a range of funding mechanisms involving participation by the private sector. These could include developer financing, in exchange for benefits granted by a public body; negotiated investments; and, private donation, involving the setting up of a non-profit corporation to build and operate transportation improvements, with the private sector making direct contributions in exchange for benefits to be derived from these improvements.
The alternatives discussed are certainly not the only funding alternatives available, but do represent a range of options that, if implemented, could generate additional revenue to address the transportation needs of Campbell County. If considered further, each alternative would need to be evaluated in terms of economics and legality given the anticipated use. As stated above, some of these programs are not currently allowed by Kentucky law, but future consideration of these alternatives should not be ignored. These alternatives are being tried or considered in other states and may warrant consideration by Kentucky as needs continue to significantly exceed available revenue.
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK 5-9 CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE
The prioritization process by the Task Force for the unscheduled needs list projects for the state and federal road system described in Chapter 3, was very productive. Input by all jurisdictions assured that the discussion on every project included the perspective from the community(s) most directly affected. This process should continue as an ongoing effort in conjunction with OKI Staff and the KYTC. It is recommended that the CCTTF or similar body remain in place beyond this plan to continue to provide input on unscheduled needs list projects and KYTC Six Year Highway Plan projects. These lists are reviewed biennially. Timing of future Task Force meetings will need to be coordinated with OKI staff to assure that meetings correlate with OKI and KYTC schedules.
COUNTY ROAD INVENTORY MAINTENANCE
The database prepared during the inventory portion of this planning process, is intended for continuous updating and use by Campbell County Staff. It is a tool for monitoring annual roadway maintenance/reconstruction and planning for future improvements. At the time this Plan is completed, the inventory will be one-year old and in need of some update due to road improvements undertaken since its completion in May 2002. Updating will entail inputting information regarding new road improvements – maintenance or reconstruction and transmitting the revised information so that the GIS data for Campbell County can also be updated.
COUNTY ROAD PRIORITIZATION
The detailed county road prioritization process described in this document and the resulting list of "Top Twenty Priority Roads" is not necessarily intended to be the final decision regarding the schedule of road improvements in Campbell County. Rather this process is the basis for sound decision-making on both physical roadway improvements and budgeting by the Campbell County Fiscal Court. It is also the basis for decisions by the Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission regarding required improvements to the County road system during land development review and approval.
The Fiscal Court must further evaluate the immediate need for roadway improvements and the extent of improvements that can be afforded within budgetary constraints. For example, several roads listed in the top twenty list are in immediate need of repaving. In the future many of these roads will need complete reconstruction to handle anticipated future use. The question of funding "temporary" solutions versus more permanent ones requires serious consideration.
CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 6-1
CAMPBELL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
This plan should be considered for adoption by all planning units within the County as an amendment to their comprehensive plans. As a part of the comprehensive plan, this document can be used by local planning commissions as a guide and basis for land use decisions within their jurisdictions.
TRANSIT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION
This plan recommends several action items related to transit, bicycle and pedestrian transportation. The preparation of a bicycle plan and the incorporation of local policies and regulations regarding connectivity are the foremost recommendations for consideration regarding these transportation modes.
Recommendations include:
• Development of additional park and ride lots; • Development of the Newport Transit Center; • Continuation of existing services – Southbank Shuttle, Daytripper, Regional Area Mobility Program (RAMP); • Continued coordination with SORTA on mass transit initiatives; • Preparation of a county-wide bicycle plan; • Continuation of pedestrian improvements; and, • Development of program, policies, and regulations to insure connectivity via these modes of transportation.
In conclusion, this plan provides all local government jurisdictions in Campbell County with a basis for future decisions and actions regarding improvements to the transportation system. It includes a "point in time" inventory of federal, state, and county roads that can be readily maintained and updated. Recommended priorities can provide local decision-makers with background information for budgeting and capital improvement projects. Priorities in this plan for state and federal roadways can provide a basis for developing city and county priorities for state and federal maintained roadways, which will be dealt with through OKI, KYTC and the Kentucky State Legislature for funding. Furthermore, it is important that this plan be evaluated and updated periodically to keep pace with growth and development issues so that it continues as a current basis for city, county, regional and state decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 6-2
CAMPBELL COUNTY CAMPBELL COUNTY APPENDIX A
CONTENTS
Government and Agency Issues With Plans and Comments
Results From Round 1, Public Input Meetings
Summary of Public Meeting Results
Summary of Responses: Station B: Bike and Pedestrian
Summary of Responses: Station C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Traveled
Comments From Round 2, Public Input Meetings
GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY COMMENTS
KY SIX-YEAR COUNTY COMMENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION UNSCHEDULED COMMENTS PLAN PLAN ONLY NEEDS Alexandria Ky 536, extension from US 27 to AA XX Ky. 547, Ky. 10 vicinity to AA X Ky. 709, turn lanes X Lickert Road, straighten and widen X Repair and upgrade all county roads in the city. X Widen (Upper) Lick Branch X No specific project included at this Add lanes at Washington (Ky 10) and US27 time Evaluate Ky 8 from I-471 to/through city (includes Portions of Ky. 8 are included in plan Dayton Bellevue) Pooles Creek No. 1, improve and add connection X Cold Spring to NKU Connect Darlas Drive and Bunning Lane Project not included in Top 20 New intersection tying E. Alexandria intersection X with Murnan/ Pooles No. 2 Cold Spring Parkway (Pooles No. 2, Murnan, East Alexandria, Low Gap) X No specific project included at this Southgate General traffic concerns time Impact of new development (US 27 and I- 471) No specific project included at this on US 27 and Blossom Lane area time Fort Thomas East/West movement in County XX Grand Avenue Traffic Management – possibly by No specific project included at this reducing from 4 to 2 lanes and adding median, time parking and pedestrian improvements.
Safety improvements to Ky. 8 Portions of Ky. 8 are included in plan No specific project included at this Bike path/lane along Memorial Parkway time GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY COMMENTS
KY SIX-YEAR COUNTY COMMENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION UNSCHEDULED COMMENTS PLAN PLAN ONLY NEEDS Wilder Connectivity of city to surrounding areas X Extend Ky. 9 to Newport XX Three Mile Road improvements to NKU X Intersection improvements at St. Johns Road and No specific project included at this Ky. 9 time No specific project included at this Realignment of Moock Road time Improve Johns Hill Road XX Improve bike and pedestrian transportation along No specific project included at this Ky. 9 and Moock Road time No specific project included at this Connection under I-275 to Gloria Terrell Drive time No specific project included at this Licking River Bridge to Taylor Mill time XX Campbell County Maximize efficiency of US 27 and Ky. 9 corridors
Improve east/west travel (i.e., Ky. 536 corridor) X NKU Improve Johns Hill Road XX Technology Triangle/NKU I-275/KY2345 to X Pooles Creek No. 1/AA Highway access road New Ky. 9 connector with Ky. 8, near Licking XX Newport River Bridge Improved I-471 southbound exit ramp to Ky. 8 XX New bridge connection with Covington at X Fourth/Fifth Street Improvements to Carothers Road and Grand No specific project included at this Avenue time "Connector" through Cote Brilliante No specific project included at this Redevelopment Area time GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY COMMENTS
KY SIX-YEAR COUNTY COMMENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION UNSCHEDULED COMMENTS PLAN PLAN ONLY NEEDS Improvements to Ky. 8 between Riverboat Row and Berry Ave. – add a center turn lane, which X may require removal of parking from one or both Bellevue sides of Ky. 8 in this area. Southbound exit ramp from I-471 onto Route 8 through – will require improvements to Riviera XX Drive and Donnermeyer Drive.
RESULTS FROM ROUND 1 PUBLIC INPUT MEETINGS SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
Ninety (90) persons attended the public meetings held on Monday, November 18 and Thursday, November 21. The Monday meeting held at the Campbell County High School had the largest attendance of eighty (80) persons. These attendance figures exclude OKI and consultant staff.
Approximately 53 percent of the persons attending completed survey forms (48 total forms). Many of the forms included the name and/or addresses of the person(s) completing the forms, which was optional. In several instances, more than one person completed the same form as indicated by multiple names on the form. Forty- one (41) survey forms were completed from the Monday meeting and seven (7) from the Thursday meeting.
Bus
1. Give us your opinion of the quality of current bus service (please select one)
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summary: 28 total responses - 17 or 61% Good; 8 or 29 % Fair
2. Give us your opinion of the quantity of current bus service (please select one)
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summary: 26 total responses – 14 or 54% Good; 9 or 35% Fair
3. I would like to see new service to:______
______
Summary: 4 responses – Butler and Rt. 177; Melbourne and east; On Licking Pike and Ky 915 past the trailer parks; and convert to smaller busses like the Southbank Shuttle.
4. Do you use the bus service? Yes No Occasionally
Summary: 44 responses – 36 or 82% No; 8 or 18% Occasionally
Rail
The Regional Rail System Plan includes possible light rail service in the northern part of the county. Is this an option that should be evaluated in more detail?
Yes No
Summary: 43 total responses – 25 or 58% No; 18 or 42% Yes
(The split between the two meeting is noteworthy in that all 6 responses or 100%, were Yes at the Newport High School location)
Comments:
______
Bike and Pedestrian
1. Improved Bike and Pedestrian facilities are important components of the transportation system.
Yes No
Summary: 39 total responses – 22 or 56% Yes; 17 or 44% No
(The Newport High School meeting results were 100 % Yes)
2. Expanded Bike and Pedestrian facilities are important components of the transportation system.
Yes No
Summary: 37 total responses – 19 or 51% Yes; 18 or 49% No
(The Newport High School meeting results were 86% Yes)
Comments: _____
______
Summary: See Summary of Responses: STATION B: Bike and Pedestrian
Summary of Responses: STATION B: Bike and Pedestrian
Improved Expanded Comments 1 Yes No Good but not necessary 2No No Road need more maintenance than they now receive - too narrow for the 3No No most part for both cars, trucks - plus bikes 4 Yes Yes Use county parks and connect them 5No No 6No No 7 Yes Yes 8No No 9 Yes Yes Bike paths are healthy 10 No No Bicycle paths in this area are intended for recreational use. The route on Rt. 8 in Campbell County is very unsafe because the bikes have to share 11 No No the road with car and truck traffic Route 8 is scenic, but not wide enough for a path for bikers. It's dangerous for them. Leave the road as is except for the slippage and 12 have the bikers go to parks elsewhere. 13 Yes Yes 14 Yes Yes 15 Yes Yes 16 Yes Yes 17 18 No No 19 No No 20 21 No No 22 Yes 23 24 25 Yes Yes 26 No No 27 28 No No 29 No No 30 No No 31 Yes Yes 32 Yes Yes 33 Living on 547 I would say that bike riding is very unsafe. Bikes do not use 34 this road as a scenic highway. 35 No No 36 Yes 37 38 No Yes 39 No No 40 Yes Yes Need safe route to protect our kids from being run over. 41 Yes Yes Better economy, better for environment, better for health STATION B: Bike and Pedestrian (cont.)
Improved Expanded Comments This provides entertainment and exercise opportunities also 42 Yes Yes transportation that is not based on the auto Must consider traffic calming in heavy bike and pedestrian areas. I do not bike now because of fear of being run over by cars and SUV's. 43 Yes Yes Frequently when I walk drivers do not yield ROW to peds. 44 Yes Yes 45 Yes No 46 Yes Yes While the quantity of traffic reduction may be minimal, the quality of life and image and recreation opportunities aspect are important to the area 47 Yes Yes The actual bike/pedestrian dedicated facilities seems terribly inadequate given the size of the county. While signage on state routes is helpful, it is 48 Yes Yes very dangerous to interact with vehicular traffic STATION C AND D: STATE AND COUNTY ROADS AND OTHER ISSUES
The Campbell County Transportation Plan Task Force appreciates the time you are taking to attend this meeting. Please help us by taking just a few minutes to complete this survey. Thank You.
1. Please indicate the roadway(s) you most frequently travel, and then CIRCLE the condition that most closely matches the condition of that roadway.
Route Pavement Safety Level of Condition Condition Congestion
E G F P E G F P E G F P
E G F P E G F P E G F P
E G F P E G F P E G F P
E G F P E G F P E G F P
E G F P E G F P E G F P
E G F P E G F P E G F P E=Excellent, G=Good, F=Fair, P=Poor
Summary: See Summary of Responses: STATION C and D: Question 1, Roadways Frequently Traveled
2. What is your biggest issue from a transportation perspective in Campbell County (please select one)? Difficulty in Reaching Desired Destination Travel Time Cost of Travel Other
Summary: 22 total responses – 10 or 45% Difficulty in Reaching Desired Destination; 11 or 50% Travel Time; 1 or 5% Cost of Travel
Responses to Other included comments relative to specific location and several mentioned safety.
3. Please identify any specific improvements you feel would significantly impact your travel.
Summary: See Summary of Responses: STATION C and D: Question 3, Identification of Specific Improvements
4. Please indicate the importance of the following ways to improve the transportation system in Campbell County (please select one).
A. Add capacity to roadway system
Very important Somewhat important Not important
Summary: 40 total responses – 20 or 50% Very Important; 11 or 28 % Somewhat important; 9 or 22 % Not important
B. Improve roadway geometrics (i.e. turn radii, roadway width, steep slopes, etc.) and traffic signalization.
Very important Somewhat important Not important
Summary: 41 total responses – 23 or 56% Very important; 13 or 32% Somewhat important; 5 or 12% Not important
C. Expand public transportation (i.e. bus service, rail transit, bike paths, etc.)
Very important Somewhat important Not important
Summary: 41 total responses – 7 or 17% Very important; 26 or 64% Somewhat important; 8 or 19% Not important
6. In number 5, if you felt all were important, which one do you feel is most important (please select one)? Add capacity to roadway system Improve roadway geometrics Expand public transportation.
Summary: 33 total responses – 14 or 42% Add Capacity; 15 or 46% Improve Roadway Geometrics; and 3 or 9% Expand public transportation (1 response "rail" was written in)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Summary: See Summary of Responses: STATION C and D: Additional Comments Summary of Responses: STATION C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Traveled
Route Pavement Cond. Safety Cond. Level of Congestion EGFPEGFPEGFP 1 US 27 (n. of AA) x x x Johns Hill Road x x x Martha Lane Collins Blvd. x x x I - 471 x x x 2 None 3 Racetrack Road x x x Persimmon Grove Rd. x x x US 27 x x x Shaw Hess x x 4 Hissem Rd. x x x Clay Ridge Rd. x US 27 x x x 5 US 27 x x x Lickert Road x x x Persimmon Grove Rd. x x x E. Alexandria Pike Connector x x x Reitman Road x x x Pooles Creek No. 1 x x x 6 Ky. 1998 East x x x Winters Lane x x x 445 (?) x x x Ky. 8 x x x 7 Pooles Creek No. 1 x x x Winters Lane x x x 8 Ky. 10 x x x Ky 1997 x x x AA Highway x x x 9 Ky. 8 x x x Ky. 547 x x x US 27 x x x 10 US 27 x x x Lickert Road x x x Licking Pike x x x Pleasant Ridge Rd. x x x Station C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Travelled Route Pavement Cond. Safety Cond. Level of Congestion EGFPEGFPEGFP 11 Ky 8 x x x 12 Ky 8 x x x Twelve Mile Road x x x Ky 9 x x x I - 275 x x x US 27 x x x Ky 10 x x x 13 None 14 Upper Eight Mile x x x Ky 547 x x x Upper Tug Fork x x x 15 Poplar Ridge Rd. x x 16 AA Highway x Poplar Ridge Rd. x US 27 x 17 Losey Rd. x x x Pleasant Ridge Rd. x x x 18 US 27 x x x AA Highway x x x 19 Persimmon Grove Pike x x x 20 None 21 Ky. 1566 x x x Ky 8 x x x 22 US 27 x x x 23 Racetrack Road x x x US 27 x x x 24 Racetrack Road x x x US 27 x x x 25 US 27 x x x AA Highway x x x 26 Ky 547 x x x Ky 10 x x x Barrs Branch Road x x x Ky 1997 x x x Ky 9 x x x Poplar Ridge Rd. x x x Station C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Travelled Route Pavement Cond. Safety Cond. Level of Congestion EGFPEGFPEGFP 27 Barrs Branch Road x x x Riley Road x x x Stevens Road x x x 28 AA Highway x x x US 27 x x x Ky 10 x x x 29 US 27 x x x Pleasant Ridge Road x x x Schmudde Phillips x x x I-471 x x x 30 None 31 Pooles Creek No. 1 x x x 32 Pooles Creek No. 1 x x x AA Highway x x x US 27 x x x 33 Ky 1997 x x x US 27 x x x Nelson Road x x x AA Highway x x x 34 Ky 547 x x x AA Highway x x 35 Sheanshang Road x x x Wagoner Road x x x California Crossroads x x x AA Highway x x x 36 Persimmon Grove Road x x California Crossroads x x 37 Ky 1997 x x x 38 Ky 10 x x x AA Highway x x x I-275 x x x 39 Daniels Road x x x AA Highway x x x US 27 x x x I-471 x x x 40 None Station C and D: QUESTION 1, Roadways Frequently Travelled Route Pavement Cond. Safety Cond. Level of Congestion EGFPEGFPEGFP 41 US 27 I-471 Kenton Station Road 42 I-471 x x x US 27 x x Ky 8 x x x 43 Ft. Thomas Avenue x x x Grand Avenue x x x Washington Street x x x 10th Street/Memorial Parkway x x x 44 None 45 US 27 x x x Pooles Creek No. 1 x x x AA Highway x x x Ky 1998 x x x I-275 x x x I-471 x x x 46 US 27 x x x 47 I-471 x x x I-275 x x x 48 I-471 x x x Park Avenue xxx I-275 xxx US 27 xxx Summary of Results: STATION C and D: Question 3 Identification of Specific Improvements
1.* rework US 27 and 471 intersection; better pedestrian walking for US 27 in cities of H.H. and CS; sidewalk improvement on county roads or just install some walkways.
2.* None
3.* Shaw Hess-as well as other roads that recently been “Re-paved” Patched – Patch job is terrible. Half patches on one side & not the other throw your vehicle all over the place – several secondary roads have received the same treatment. A WASTE OF MONEY!
4. Need bypass around Alexandria on the south. Need to improve licking Pike (915) from sun Valley to I 275/AA. Need turn lanes at Lickert & US 27. Need light at Clay Road & US 27.
5. Rt turn lane on AA at E. Alex Pk. East bound. Rt turn lane on AA exit at US 27 Cold Spring onto US 27 South.
6. Intersection at 27 & 1998
7. Mile markers continuity throughout state
8.* None
9.* Congestion on US 27 Going North in AM, and South in PM. (Make 3 lanes N. in AM-3 Lanes S. in PM)
10.* US 27 and Lickert Road needs turn lites from all 4 ways. School time got to sit in 6-8 lites from Lickert Rd. to US 27 each morning. Someone is going to get killed! Pleasant Ridge Rd and Licking Pike still got one lane horse and burggy Bridge. Road coming out on angle onto Licking Pike. Should meet with school’s drive. Kids will not let you out. Someone is going to get killed here also.
11.* None
12.* There is no reason for these of us living on RT 8 or along it to love 536 coming to us. Leave our land (farms) alone. Don’t “fix” roads with cement vomit.
13.* None
14.* Building the proposed new 536 route.
15.* Create outer belt (536 to RT 9) 16. None
17.* Pleasant Ridge Rd & Losey Rd. install 3 way stop sign Pleasant Ridge Rd & Licking Pike install 3 way stop sign until improvement is made. Large tree on Pleasant Ridge by Deckers needs to be cut down.
18.* Adequately maintained existing roads especially county roads.
19.* Improve pavement on Persimmon Grove Pike from RT 10 to Lickert Rd.
20. None
21.* None
22. None
23. US 27 @ Parkside US 27 @ Lickert
24. US 27 @ Parkside US 27 @ Lickert
25.* The intersection of 27 & AA. As these parcels develop the traffic will get terrible. Try leaving O’Charlies and turing left to go Smith to Alexandria – extremely difficult during rush hour. As the parcel between Meijers and O’Charlies develops there needs to be a lot of planning regarding curb cuts to enter & exit this parcel so we don’t get a bunch of people killed by traffic backing up to enter/exit this parcel.
26.* Improve safety intersections on RT 9 AA hwy at Poplan Ridge, E. Alex Pike, RT 1997, and 1996 Get school busses off barrs Branch Rd. safety is a priority on AA highway before 536 connector is added. It should all be limited access.
27.* Make left turns unnessary on AA highway.
28.* None
29.* Change intersection Licking Pike and Pleasant Ridge Rd. Remove Oaktree ½ mile west on Pleasant Ridge Rd. Tree at edge of Blacktop Road. Install STOP SIGN on Pleasant Ridge Rd and Losey for a two way stop.
30. None
31.* Improve cross county travel. Less windy travel we need to improve roads to support businesses better travel for employees.
32.* None
33. None
34.* None
35.* We request maintenance of Sheanshang Road #2 CR 1127A beyond the 600 foot maintained road in accordance with Campbell County Fiscal Court ordinance 0-6-90, Book 38 page 438.
36.* I think the connector between 536 & AA is an absolute necessity. Could something be done about Persimmon Grove from Burns Rd to California Crossroad. The shoulder of the road needs to be fixed.
37.* On RT 1997 6thenths of a mile from RT 547 limbs are tooo close to the road it’s on a curse and my mail box is there not safe to get my mail could the speed limit be lower to 35 miles a hour for our safety and the small trees cut down.
38. None
39.* Need traffic signal at ramp off AA onto US 27
40.* Timed traffic lights could be synchronized better to facilitate main route traffic flow during rush hour. After all the main route is where the traffic is – keep it rolling.
41.* Intersection US 27 & KY 9 AA exit ramp at signal needs two lanes. Each should have its own detector. And each with its own delay. Much too often all traffic on US 27 stops for a vehicle that has already turned right.
42* The ramp from I-471 south to Route 8 in Newport needs to be relocated. It regularly backs up onto the highway – even though lanes have been added on Park Ave. and parking was eliminated on Park Ave. This ramp empties into a national historic neighborhood. The speeds coming off the highway are too fast for the curve (cars regularly run through the traffic island) and speeds are too fast for a residential neighborhood. The volume is so high that it is dangerous for a pedestrian to cross Park Ave. where the ramp connects to Route 8. There is no stop light, stop sign or yield sign between I-471 and Route 8 and it is hard for vehicles or pedestrians to access or cross Park Ave. (diagram included with text.)
43. More peak transit so I could ride it more often as an option. Calming traffic in congested areas. Safer pedestrian travel (better lighting, crosswalks, enforcement).
44. None
45. Reduce truck traffic Develop alternate routes to relieve US 27 congestion
46.* Ky 709 (US 27 to AA Connector) – upgrade to both R & L turn lanes at 27 and AA to move traffic thru lights faster. Better yet make it 4 lanes all the way!
47.* None
48.* Rush hour on S. I-471 is a mess. Additionally, the traffic stack at the 1st Newport exit to the Levee is extremely dangerous and discouraging to visitors.
STATION C and D Additional Comments
1.* None
2.* We need a connector road US 27 to AA Hwy. and US 27 to Visalia, Kenton County to I-75 and I-71
3.* #US 27- Get rid of some congestion – Alexandria is the most congested part of the drive from Ohio to Grants Lick.
No need for 536 from AA to #8- a complete waste of money & misuse of property. Who is going to benefit from it? Nothing to go to on Mary Inglis.
4. None
5. None
6. None
7. None
8. None
9.* Educate drives & enforce traffic laws might help.
Restrict large truck traffic to “Off” hours
Encourage/Reward use of public transit
10.* If you’ve got larger capacity to road system you will have better geometrics to roads.
11.* I feel that the extension of 536 to RTE 8 is wasteful spending. RTE 8 is prone to constant slippage in the area where the proposed 536 would intersect with RT 8. RT 8 is being used as a bike path, it also has other recreational activities, it doesn’t need a high volume of traffic to endanger the participants. RT 8 has a low volume of traffic, the need for the 536 connector would not justify the cost.
12.* There is no need for 536 to come from AA (RT9) to RT 8 Golf course. Hose a B/B and LaFarge should’ve thought of their “neighbors” before they located. Also, “government” or those making road location decision should consider the little guy – sreen space – and farmers not big money. Your 536 is coming right through my house. We didn’t want sanitation plan, and we don’t want to lose our home for an unnecessary road. We are going to fight tooth and nail. Taking homes to make a few minutes from travel time is ridiculous and those living in area have been fine with existing roadways, so truth should be told and we’ll deal with it there. It’s a flood area.
13.* Stop the run of water coming off the AA highway at 189 A Nelson & at the Brentwood Nursing and coming on to our property of Leroy J. & Germaine Kremer.
14.* None
15.* None
16. None
17.* None
18.* None
19.* None
20. None
21.* None
22. None
23. None
24. None
25.* Please send me info and keep me informed regarding the intersection of 536 & US 27. We live in the Woodstone development at the very end of Stonegate Drive and I would like to see where the proposed “connector road” from 27 to RT 8 is potentially going as it relates to our property. Bill & Susan Rachford – 153 Stonegate Dr. – Alexandria, KY 41001 – 635-2017
Someone should look into widening and improving Old State Rd # 2. As development continues on this road traffic will get worse. The road is very narrow with no shoulders. Pedestrians use this too of 35 homes (Beacon Hill Estates) is coming and Drees is adding onto Southwood Development. The road will not be able to handle the increased traffic flow in a safe manner.
26.* None
27.* Remove traffic from inferior roads especially heavy trucks Remove school busses from inferior roads. Spend your money on existing main roads and quit trying to make highways out of trash roads. Quit building monuments to yourselves.
28.* The RT 536 project in my opinion is a gross waste of tax payer’s monies. The project will bring a 2, 3 or 4 lane highway to a rural, tranquil area. It will bring light noise and air pollution to residents who have made conscious decisions to live a rural life. The residents of this area are not interested in getting from place to place any quicker. The monies proposed for the RT 536 project would be better spent on other projects. (Perhaps improvements to existing roads) The portion of Rt 536 that would go from RT 27 to AA hwy would greatly disturb the current tranquility and serenity. We now live in the “country” and want to continue to live in the “country”
29.* None
30. Need a connector from 27 to AA highway
31.* None
32.* None
33. None
34.* None
35.* Refer to item # 3 and cover for all signatures for all input.
36.* None
37.* None
38. None
39. None
40.* Post on website transportation plan, volume, pavement condition, accident info, most of these statistics are vital to planning especially proposed bike routes and routes in general planned by the public also dates of completion are also nice in planning my life as far as construction goes.
41.* Short term, long term
42.* We need to get out of cars and to live closer to our work.
I don't want to pay for roads through N. Ky. so people in Clermont County, OH. can get to work faster. 43. As Campbell Co. ages pub transit will be more important. Governments in areas should set an example and implement transit subsidies for their employees. These programs are low cost and federally subsidized.
44. None
45. Address access for NKU to eleviate City (Highland Hts./Cold Spring) traffic would significantly enhance city life and growth. NKU growth can significantly help or hinder Highland Heights/Cold Spring community. The more traffic access that can be offloaded around the cities will allow cities to develop residential communities to fully support NKU needs.
46.* Ky. 709 has more then 1000 car count.
Ky. 536 needs to be built from US 27 to AA, not moved off its earlier plan. We have no safe east-west rd. from 27 – AA.
47* None
48* None Comments From Round 2, Public Input Meetings
During the Round 2 public meetings only four (4) comments sheets were returned. Responses on these included:
• requesting that roadway improvements be made within the portions of the county where most of the population is residing; • a request for more dedicated bikeways within the transportation system; • a request to re-establish transit service to the City of Crestview; and • the need to improve access (ingress and egress) along the AA Highway at heavily used intersections.
CAMPBELL COUNTY APPENDIX B
CONTENTS
KYTC Highway Information System Information for State Maintained Roadways (For Designated Roadways Only) Highway Systems Geometric Characteristics Existing Traffic Characteristics Accident Segment Analysis Accident Spot Analysis
Locally Maintained Functionally Classified Analysis Highway Systems Geometric Characteristics Existing Traffic Characteristics Accident Segment Analysis Highway Systems State Maintained (Designated Routes)
National National Truck Truck Weight Begin MP Begin Route End MP End Route State System Highway Functional Classification Network (NN) Class System (NHS) KY 8 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 0.000 Kenton Co. Line 0.632 US 27 (York St) State Secondary No Yes Urban Principal Arterial AAA 0.632 US 27 (York St) 0.998 I-471 State Secondary No Yes Urban Principal Arterial AA 0.998 I-471 1.389 NA State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AA 1.389 NA 3.181 NA State Secondary No No Urban Collector AA 3.181 NA 7.814 KY 445 State Secondary No No Urban Collector A 7.814 KY 445 8.976 KY 1998 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AA 8.976 KY 1998 12.378 Seneca Dr State Primary (Other) No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 12.378 Seneca Dr 24.193 KY 735 State Primary (Other) No No Rural Major Collector AAA 24.193 KY 735 25.722 Pendleton Co. Line State Secondary No No Rural Major Collector AAA KY 9 MP 17.978 - MP 22.943 17.978 I-275 19.408 KY 2345 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 19.408 KY 2345 19.769 KY 2238 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 19.769 KY 2238 20.052 KY 1632 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 20.052 KY 1632 20.837 Waterworks State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 20.837 Waterworks 21.601 McCracken Ave. State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 21.601 McCracken Ave. 21.961 Brighton St. State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 21.961 Brighton St. 22.324 KY 1120 (11th St.) State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 22.324 KY 1120 (11th St.) 22.739 7th St. State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA 22.739 7th St. 22.943 KY 8 West (4th St.) State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial AAA KY 10 MP 0.000 - MP 4.423 0.000 KY 915 1.754 KY 547 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial Street A 1.754 KY 547 4.271 Bush Creek Bridge State Secondary No No Urban Collector Street A 4.271 Bush Creek Bridge 4.423 KY 1997 State Secondary No No Rural Minor Collector A KY 547 MP 0.000 - MP 6.590 0.000 KY 10 in Alexandria 1.690 Rural Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial Street A 1.69 5.388 Rural Secondary No No Rural Minor Arterial A 5.388 6.590 KY 8 in Silver Grove Rural Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial Street A KY 824 MP 0.000 - 3.109 0.000 US 27 3.109 KY 1121 Rural Secondary No No Rural Minor Collector A KY 915 MP 0.00 - 9.227 0.000 US 27 2.254 KY 10 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A 2.254 KY 10 5.914 KY 2924 State Secondary No No Urban Collector A 5.914 KY 2924 9.227 KY 9 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A
Source: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database Highway Systems State Maintained (Designated Routes)
National National Truck Truck Weight Begin MP Begin Route End MP End Route State System Highway Functional Classification Network (NN) Class System (NHS) KY 1121 MP 0.000 - MP 10.078 KY 10 at Wesley 0.000 5.264 KY 824 Rural Secondary No No Rural Minor Collector A Chapel 5.264 KY 824 7.625 Barris Rd./Lickert Rd. Rural Secondary No No Rural Local A 7.625 Barris Rd./Lickert Rd. 10.078 KY 10 in Alexandria Rural Secondary No No Urban Local A KY 1997 MP 0.000 - 0.880 0.000 KY 10 0.880 KY 9 Rural Secondary No No Rural Minor Collector A KY 1998 MP 0.000 - MP 3.939 0.000 KY 9 1.738 US 27 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial Street A 1.738 US 27 3.939 KY 8 State Primary (Other) Yes No Urban Principal Arterial AAA KY 2238 MP 0.000 - MP 2.442 0.000 0.400 Gibson Rd. State Secondary No No Urban Collector Street A 0.400 Gibson Rd. 2.442 KY 9 State Secondary No No Urban Collector Street A KY 2345 MP 0.000 - MP 3.316 0.000 0.615 KY 3490 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A 0.615 KY 3490 0.819 University Drive State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A 0.819 University Drive 1.664 Observatory Point Dr. State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A 1.664 Observatory Point Dr. 2.167 Sentinel Dr. State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A 2.167 Sentinel Dr. 3.316 KY 9 State Secondary No No Urban Minor Arterial A KY 2924 MP 0.000 - MP 2.757 0.000 US 27 2.757 KY 915 Rural Secondary No No Urban Local A
Source: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database Geometric Characteristics State Maintained (Designated Routes)
Shoulder Width Begin MP End MP Length (miles) Number of Lanes Lane Width (feet) Speed Limit (mph) Roadway Type (feet) KY 8 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 0.000 0.193 0.193 312Curbed 30 Undivided Highway 0.193 0.460 0.267 410Curbed 30 Couplet 0.460 0.632 0.172 211Curbed 30 Couplet 0.632 0.760 0.128 211Curbed 30 Undivided Highway 0.760 0.840 0.080 211Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 0.840 1.163 0.323 4122 35 Divided Highway 1.163 1.275 0.112 412Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 1.275 1.378 0.103 210Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 1.378 3.186 1.808 210Curbed 25 Undivided Highway 3.186 3.545 0.359 2101 25 Undivided Highway 3.545 4.020 0.475 2101 35 Undivided Highway 4.020 4.273 0.253 291 35 Undivided Highway 4.273 4.589 0.316 2101 35 Undivided Highway 4.589 7.634 3.045 2101 55 Undivided Highway 7.634 7.860 0.226 21210 55 Divided Highway 7.860 8.020 0.160 21210 45 Divided Highway 8.020 10.464 2.444 2111 45 Undivided Highway 10.464 10.481 0.017 2111 35 Undivided Highway 10.481 11.106 0.625 211Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 11.106 11.130 0.024 2111 35 Undivided Highway 11.130 12.645 1.515 2111 40 Undivided Highway 12.645 15.930 3.285 2111 45 Undivided Highway 15.930 17.696 1.766 2101 45 Undivided Highway KY 9 MP 17.978 - MP 22.943 17.978 18.160 0.182 21210 45 Divided Highway 18.160 18.420 0.260 291 45 Undivided Highway 18.420 19.540 1.120 291 35 Undivided Highway 19.540 19.553 0.013 291 45 Undivided Highway 19.553 19.847 0.294 2101 45 Undivided Highway 19.847 20.052 0.205 4122 45 Undivided Highway 20.052 20.144 0.092 4122 45 Divided Highway 20.144 20.266 0.122 4122 45 Undivided Highway 20.266 21.770 1.504 2122 45 Undivided Highway 21.770 21.878 0.108 2122 35 Undivided Highway 21.878 22.090 0.212 212Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 22.090 22.943 0.853 212Curbed 25 Undivided Highway
Source: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database Geometric Characteristics State Maintained (Designated Routes)
Shoulder Width Begin MP End MP Length (miles) Number of Lanes Lane Width (feet) Speed Limit (mph) Roadway Type (feet) KY 10 MP 0.000 - MP 4.423 0.000 0.975 0.975 2 9 3 45 Undivided Highway 0.975 1.130 0.155 2 9 3 35 Undivided Highway 1.130 1.440 0.310 2 9 2 35 Undivided Highway 1.440 1.826 0.386 2 9 2 25 Undivided Highway 1.826 2.110 0.284 2 10 2 25 Undivided Highway 2.110 2.360 0.250 2 10 2 35 Undivided Highway 2.360 2.800 0.440 2 10 2 45 Undivided Highway 2.800 4.423 1.623 2 10 2 55 Undivided Highway KY 547 MP 0.000 - MP 6.590 0.000 1.300 1.300 2 9 3 30 Undivided Highway 1.300 1.700 0.400 2 10 6 30 Undivided Highway 1.700 1.900 0.200 2 10 6 30 Undivided Highway 1.900 3.200 1.300 2 9 6 30 Undivided Highway 3.200 3.800 0.600 2 9 6 35 Undivided Highway 3.800 4.200 0.400 2 9 6 55 Undivided Highway 4.200 5.800 1.600 2 9 6 45 Undivided Highway 5.800 5.900 0.100 2 9 6 25 Undivided Highway 5.900 6.590 0.690 2 9 10 25 Undivided Highway KY 824 MP 0.000 - 3.109 0.000 2.800 2.800 2 9 3 55 Undivided Highway 2.800 3.109 0.309 2 9 3 35 Undivided Highway KY 915 MP 0.00 - 9.227 0.000 0.146 0.146 2 11 2 35 Undivided Highway 0.146 0.224 0.078 2 10 2 35 Undivided Highway 0.224 0.35 0.126 2 10 3 35 Undivided Highway 0.350 1.727 1.377 2 10 3 45 Undivided Highway 1.727 2.254 0.527 2 10 1 45 Undivided Highway 2.254 9.227 6.973 2 10 1 55 Undivided Highway KY 1121 MP 0.000 - MP 10.078 0.000 5.000 5.000 2 9 5 55 Undivided Highway 5.000 5.500 0.500 2 9 5 35 Undivided Highway 5.500 8.200 2.700 2 9 5 55 Undivided Highway 8.200 9.000 0.800 2 9 5 35 Undivided Highway 9.000 9.800 0.800 2 9 5 55 Undivided Highway 9.800 10.078 0.278 2 9 5 35 Undivided Highway
Source: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database Geometric Characteristics State Maintained (Designated Routes)
Shoulder Width Begin MP End MP Length (miles) Number of Lanes Lane Width (feet) Speed Limit (mph) Roadway Type (feet) KY 1997 MP 0.000 - 0.880 0.000 0.650 0.650 2 8 3 55 Undivided Highway 0.650 0.880 0.230 2 11 3 55 Undivided Highway KY 1998 MP 0.000 - MP 3.939 0.000 0.165 0.165 2 10 6 35 Undivided Highway 0.165 0.721 0.556 2 9 2 35 Undivided Highway 0.721 1.500 0.779 2 10 2 35 Undivided Highway 1.500 1.685 0.185 211635 Undivided Highway 1.685 1.740 0.055 211235 Undivided Highway 1.740 2.130 0.390 211245 Undivided Highway 2.130 2.330 0.200 2 11 Curbed 45 Undivided Highway 2.330 3.939 1.609 2 11 Curbed 55 Undivided Highway KY 2238 MP 0.000 - MP 2.442 0.000 0.328 0.328 4 12 Curbed 45 Divided Highway 0.328 1.100 0.772 2 12 10 45 Undivided Highway 1.100 1.103 0.003 2 12 10 35 Undivided Highway 1.103 1.207 0.104 2 12 Curbed 35 Undivided Highway 1.207 1.317 0.110 2 12 1 35 Undivided Highway 1.317 1.426 0.109 2 10 None 35 Undivided Highway 1.426 1.493 0.067 2 9 None 35 Undivided Highway 1.493 2.442 0.949 2 7 None 35 Undivided Highway KY 2345 MP 0.000 - MP 3.316 0.000 0.315 0.315 2 11 2 35 Undivided Highway 0.315 0.615 0.300 2 12 8 35 Undivided Highway 0.615 0.655 0.040 2 10 1 35 Undivided Highway 0.655 1.072 0.417 2 11 2 35 Undivided Highway 1.072 1.600 0.528 2 11 8 35 Undivided Highway 1.600 2.780 1.180 2 10 2 35 Undivided Highway 2.780 3.100 0.320 2 11 3 35 Undivided Highway 3.100 3.316 0.216 2 11 8 35 Undivided Highway KY 2924 MP 0.000 - MP 2.757 0.000 0.160 0.160 2 10 2 35 Undivided Highway 0.160 0.340 0.180 2 10 3 35 Undivided Highway 0.340 2.757 2.417 2 8 3 35 Undivided Highway
Source: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database Existing Traffic Characteristics State Maintained (Designated Routes)
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) % Trucks 2002 ADT 2002 LOS
KY 8 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 0.000 0.193 0.193 NA 21,400 E 0.193 0.364 0.171 NA 21,000 C 0.364 0.460 0.096 NA 16,030 B 0.460 0.632 0.172 NA 16,030 B 0.632 0.730 0.098 4.1 6,250 B 0.730 0.840 0.110 4.1 20,500 E 0.840 1.160 0.320 4.1 20,500 B 1.160 1.275 0.115 4.1 28,300 C 1.275 1.640 0.365 4.1 28,300 F 1.640 2.250 0.610 3.7 16,200 D 2.250 2.593 0.343 3.7 9,620 C 2.593 2.770 0.177 3.7 3,860 A 2.770 2.960 0.190 3.7 2,490 A 2.960 4.945 1.985 3.7 1,800 A 4.945 5.577 0.632 3.7 2,160 A 5.577 7.814 2.237 NA 1,930 A 7.814 8.193 0.379 NA 5,390 C 8.193 8.976 0.783 NA 5,280 C 8.976 10.693 1.717 NA 8,060 C 10.693 13.758 3.065 7.2 3,800 B 13.758 15.877 2.119 7.2 1,480 A 15.877 17.696 1.819 7.2 1,090 A KY 9 MP 15.940 - MP 22.943 17.978 19.408 1.430 5.5 11,100 C 19.408 19.769 0.361 5.5 11,000 C 19.769 19.847 0.078 5.5 11,600 C 19.847 20.052 0.205 5.5 11,600 A 20.052 20.266 0.214 5.5 9,860 A 20.266 20.837 0.571 5.5 9,860 C 20.837 21.601 0.764 NA 8,710 C 21.601 21.961 0.360 NA 7,240 B 21.961 22.324 0.363 NA 5,710 B 22.324 22.739 0.415 NA 4,340 A 22.739 22.943 0.204 NA 4,670 A KY 10 MP 0.000 - MP 4.423 0.000 0.713 0.713 NA 1,750 A 0.713 1.305 0.592 NA 3,090 A 1.305 1.754 0.449 NA 7,390 B 1.754 2.055 0.301 4.1 8,300 C 2.055 4.423 2.368 4.1 5,850 B KY 547 MP 0.000 - MP 6.590 0.000 1.670 1.670 4.1 3,180 A 1.670 1.831 0.161 4.1 2,740 A 1.831 2.932 1.101 4.1 2,130 A 2.932 3.585 0.653 4.1 2,300 A 3.585 5.016 1.431 4.1 2,040 A 5.016 6.000 0.984 4.1 1,880 A 6.000 6.590 0.590 4.1 2,850 A KY 824 MP 0.000 - MP 3.109 0.000 2.036 2.036 NA 1,440 A 2.036 3.109 1.073 NA 409 A
Sources: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database, Transportation Research Board's 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Existing Traffic Characteristics State Maintained (Designated Routes)
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) % Trucks 2002 ADT 2002 LOS
KY 915 MP 0.000 - MP 9.227 0.000 1.491 1.491 NA 653 A 1.491 1.727 0.236 NA 2,500 A 1.727 2.254 0.527 NA 1,790 A 2.254 4.245 1.991 NA 1,050 A 4.245 7.282 3.037 8.6 1,150 A 7.282 9.227 1.945 8.6 1,660 A KY 1121 MP 0.000 - MP 10.078 0.000 1.823 1.823 9.4 167 A 1.823 2.943 1.120 9.4 268 A 2.943 5.264 2.321 9.4 652 A 5.264 5.760 0.496 10.5 702 A 5.760 7.625 1.865 10.5 1,070 A 7.625 8.838 1.213 18.4 1,070 A 8.838 10.078 1.240 18.4 2,480 A KY 1997 MP 0.000 - MP 0.880 0.000 0.880 0.880 NA 970 A KY 1998 MP 0.000 - MP 3.939 0.000 0.721 0.721 NA 3,740 B 0.721 1.738 1.017 NA 3,960 B 1.738 2.169 0.431 9.4 8,090 C 2.169 2.325 0.156 9.4 6,070 B 2.325 3.939 1.614 9.4 5,940 B KY 2238 MP 0.000 - MP 2.442 0.000 0.400 0.400 NA 8,150 A 0.400 2.442 2.042 NA 660 A KY 2345 MP 0.000 - MP 3.316 0.000 0.615 0.615 9.6 13,400 D 0.615 0.819 0.204 NA 6,140 B 0.819 1.664 0.845 NA 3,020 A 1.664 2.167 0.503 NA 2,840 A 2.167 3.316 1.149 Na 3,090 A KY 2924 MP 0.000 - MP 2.757 0.000 0.330 0.330 NA 862 A 0.330 2.757 2.427 NA 934 A
Sources: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database, Transportation Research Board's 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Accident Segment Analysis (1999-2001) State Maintained Roadways (Designated Routes)
Length Number of Divided / Rural / Avg. Acc. Critical Acc. Accidents Rates per HMVM or MV Critical Rate Begin MP End MP ADT HMVM (miles) Lanes Undivided Urban Rate Rate Fatal Injury PDO Total Fatal Injury PDO Total Factor KY 8 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 0.000 0.193 0.193 21,400 3 Undivided Urban 531 821.182 0 11 27 38 0.05 0.00 243.22 597.01 840.23 1.02 0.193 0.364 0.171 21,000 4* Divided Urban 330 578.703 0 10 46 56 0.04 0.00 254.31 1169.84 1424.16 2.46 0.364 0.460 0.096 16,030 4* Divided Urban 330 720.162 0 6 25 31 0.02 0.00 356.07 1483.61 1839.68 2.55 0.460 0.632 0.172 16,030 4* Divided Urban 330 615.879 0 12 53 65 0.03 0.00 397.47 1755.50 2152.97 3.50 0.632 0.730 0.098 6,250 4 Undivided Urban 333 981.545 0 2 5 7 0.01 0.00 298.20 745.50 1043.71 1.06 0.730 0.840 0.110 20,500 2 Undivided Urban 333 652.398 0 2 19 21 0.02 0.00 81.00 769.47 850.47 1.30 0.840 1.160 0.320 20,500 4 Divided Urban 330 511.561 0 7 57 64 0.07 0.00 97.45 793.52 890.97 1.74 1.160 1.275 0.115 28,300 4 Undivided Urban 541 872.422 0 3 15 18 0.04 0.00 84.18 420.91 505.10 0.58 1.275 1.640 0.365 28,300 2 Undivided Urban 333 477.193 0 13 49 62 0.11 0.00 114.93 433.21 548.15 1.15 1.640 2.250 0.610 16,200 2 Undivided Urban 333 480.523 0 14 55 69 0.11 0.00 129.38 508.28 637.66 1.33 2.250 2.593 0.343 9,620 2 Undivided Urban 333 594.140 0 1 5 6 0.04 0.00 27.68 138.38 166.06 0.28 2.593 2.770 0.177 3,860 2 Undivided Urban 333 943.310 0 0 2 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 267.33 267.33 0.28 2.770 2.960 0.190 2,490 2 Undivided Urban 333 1082.624 0 0 1 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 193.03 193.03 0.18 2.960 4.945 1.985 1,800 2 Undivided Urban 333 583.433 0 1 4 5 0.04 0.00 25.56 102.24 127.80 0.22 4.945 5.577 0.632 2,160 2 Undivided Urban 333 750.931 0 5 17 22 0.01 0.00 334.49 1137.27 1471.76 1.96 5.577 7.634 2.057 1,930 2 Undivided Urban 333 569.959 0 1 4 5 0.04 0.00 23.00 92.01 115.02 0.20 7.634 7.814 0.180 1,930 2 Divided Urban 333 1226.599 0 0 3 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 788.64 788.64 0.64 7.814 8.020 0.206 5,390 2 Divided Urban 333 800.442 0 0 1 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 82.25 82.25 0.10 8.020 8.193 0.173 5,390 2 Undivided Urban 333 847.173 0 2 2 4 0.01 0.00 195.88 195.88 391.75 0.46 8.193 8.976 0.783 5,280 2 Undivided Urban 333 564.979 0 7 11 18 0.05 0.00 154.63 242.99 397.61 0.70 8.976 10.693 1.717 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 333 457.055 0 18 23 41 0.15 0.00 118.78 151.78 270.56 0.59 10.693 12.378 1.685 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 333 517.660 1 19 15 35 0.07 14.26 270.99 213.94 499.20 0.96 12.378 13.758 1.380 3,800 2 Undivided Rural 252 431.358 0 2 3 5 0.06 0.00 34.83 52.24 87.07 0.20 13.758 15.877 2.119 1,480 2 Undivided Rural 252 487.230 0 2 6 8 0.03 0.00 58.24 174.72 232.96 0.48 15.877 17.696 1.819 1,090 2 Undivided Rural 252 552.560 1 3 6 10 0.02 46.06 138.18 276.36 460.60 0.83 KY 9 MP 17.978 - MP 22.943 17.978 19.408 1.430 11,100 2 Undivided Urban 333 448.631 0 20 25 45 0.17 0.00 115.07 143.84 258.90 0.58 19.408 19.769 0.361 11,000 2 Undivided Urban 333 569.929 0 1 0 1 0.04 0.00 23.00 0.00 23.00 0.04 19.769 20.052 0.283 11,600 4 Undivided Urban 541 870.930 0 3 3 6 0.04 0.00 83.46 83.46 166.91 0.19 20.052 20.837 0.785 9,860 4 Undivided Urban 541 752.708 1 2 7 10 0.08 11.80 23.60 82.59 117.99 0.16 20.837 21.601 0.764 8,710 2 Undivided Urban 333 514.005 0 1 0 1 0.07 0.00 13.72 0.00 13.72 0.03 21.601 21.961 0.360 7,240 2 Undivided Urban 333 628.773 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.961 22.324 0.363 5,710 2 Undivided Urban 333 667.055 0 1 1 2 0.02 0.00 44.06 44.06 88.12 0.13 22.324 22.739 0.415 4,340 2 Undivided Urban 333 693.080 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.739 22.943 0.204 4,670 2 Undivided Urban 333 841.173 0 1 1 2 0.01 0.00 95.86 95.86 191.72 0.23 KY 10 MP 0.000 - MP 4.423 0.000 0.713 0.713 1,750 2 Undivided Urban 333 771.754 0 4 7 11 0.01 0.00 292.76 512.34 805.10 1.04 0.713 1.305 0.592 3,090 2 Undivided Urban 333 690.102 0 1 9 10 0.02 0.00 49.92 449.31 499.24 0.72 1.305 1.754 0.449 7,390 2 Undivided Urban 333 593.374 0 1 19 20 0.04 0.00 27.52 522.94 550.46 0.93 1.754 2.055 0.301 8,300 2 Undivided Urban 333 635.487 0 1 12 13 0.03 0.00 36.55 438.65 475.21 0.75 2.055 4.271 2.216 5,850 2 Undivided Urban 333 461.289 0 9 20 29 0.14 0.00 63.40 140.89 204.30 0.44 4.271 4.423 0.152 5,850 2 Undivided Rural 333 860.740 0 0 1 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 102.70 102.70 0.12 Accident Segment Analysis (1999-2001) State Maintained Roadways (Designated Routes)
Length Number of Divided / Rural / Avg. Acc. Critical Acc. Accidents Rates per HMVM or MV Critical Rate Begin MP End MP ADT HMVM (miles) Lanes Undivided Urban Rate Rate Fatal Injury PDO Total Fatal Injury PDO Total Factor KY 547 MP 0.000 - MP 6.590 0.000 1.67 1.670 3,180 2 Undivided Urban 333 536.533 0 2 11 13 0.06 0.00 34.39 189.16 223.56 0.42 1.670 1.69 0.020 2,740 2 Undivided Urban 333 3085.231 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1666.50 1666.50 0.54 1.690 1.831 0.141 2,740 2 Undivided Rural 252 998.907 0 2 1 3 0.00 0.00 472.77 236.38 709.15 0.71 1.831 2.932 1.101 2,130 2 Undivided Rural 252 526.656 0 2 9 11 0.03 0.00 77.88 350.48 428.36 0.81 2.932 3.585 0.653 2,300 2 Undivided Rural 252 601.276 0 2 7 9 0.02 0.00 121.61 425.64 547.25 0.91 3.585 5.016 1.431 2,040 2 Undivided Rural 252 496.362 0 4 6 10 0.03 0.00 125.13 187.70 312.84 0.63 5.016 5.388 0.372 1,880 2 Undivided Rural 252 784.584 0 6 3 9 0.01 0.00 783.50 391.75 1175.24 1.50 5.388 6 0.612 1,880 2 Undivided Urban 252 656.008 0 4 1 5 0.01 0.00 317.49 79.37 396.87 0.60 6.000 6.59 0.590 2,850 2 Undivided Urban 333 706.583 0 3 3 6 0.02 0.00 162.93 162.93 325.87 0.46 KY 824 MP 0.000 - 3.109 0.000 2.036 2.036 1,440 2 Undivided Rural 252 495.803 0 3 5 8 0.03 0.00 93.45 155.75 249.19 0.50 2.036 3.109 1.073 409 2 Undivided Rural 252 945.947 0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 416.19 416.19 0.44 KY 915 MP 0.00 - 9.227 0.000 1.491 1.491 653 2 Undivided Urban 333 835.165 0 7 19 26 0.01 0.00 656.59 1782.17 2438.76 2.92 1.491 1.727 0.236 2,500 2 Undivided Urban 333 995.230 0 1 2 3 0.01 0.00 154.79 309.57 464.36 0.47 1.727 2.254 0.527 1,790 2 Undivided Urban 333 843.924 0 2 1 3 0.01 0.00 193.62 96.81 290.43 0.34 2.254 4.245 1.991 1,050 2 Undivided Urban 333 665.535 1 4 5 10 0.02 43.68 174.74 218.42 436.84 0.66 4.245 7.282 3.037 1,150 2 Undivided Urban 333 586.449 1 7 17 25 0.04 26.15 183.04 444.52 653.71 1.11 7.282 9.227 1.945 1,660 2 Undivided Urban 333 597.147 0 8 13 21 0.04 0.00 226.28 367.71 593.99 0.99 KY 1121, MP 0.000 to MP 10.078 0.000 1.823 1.823 167 2 Undivided Rural 252 1110.238 0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 599.95 599.95 0.54 1.823 2.943 1.120 268 2 Undivided Rural 252 1117.410 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.00 304.25 0.00 304.25 0.27 2.943 5.264 2.321 652 2 Undivided Rural 252 599.845 0 1 4 5 0.02 0.00 60.35 241.39 301.74 0.50 5.264 5.760 0.496 702 2 Undivided Rural 252 1045.402 0 2 1 3 0.00 0.00 524.56 262.28 786.84 0.75 5.76 7.625 1.865 1,070 2 Undivided Rural 252 551.517 0 4 16 20 0.02 0.00 183.06 732.22 915.28 1.66 7.625 8.838 1.213 1,070 2 Undivided Rural 252 630.199 0 1 2 3 0.01 0.00 70.36 140.73 211.09 0.33 8.838 10.078 1.240 2,480 2 Undivided Rural 252 489.693 0 3 7 10 0.03 0.00 89.09 207.88 296.97 0.61 KY 1997 MP 0.000 - 0.880 0.000 0.880 0.880 970 2 Undivided Rural 252 728.466 0 0 1 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 106.99 106.99 0.15 KY 1998 MP 0.000 - MP 3.939 0.000 0.721 0.721 3740 2 Undivided Urban 333 623.497 0 0 8 8 0.03 0.00 0.00 270.94 270.94 0.43 0.721 1.738 1.017 3960 2 Undivided Urban 333 568.186 0 1 5 6 0.04 0.00 22.68 113.38 136.06 0.24 1.738 2.169 0.431 8090 2 Undivided Urban 333 586.669 0 0 2 2 0.04 0.00 0.00 52.38 52.38 0.09 2.169 2.325 0.156 6070 2 Undivided Urban 333 842.863 0 0 2 2 0.01 0.00 0.00 192.89 192.89 0.23 2.325 3.939 1.614 5940 2 Undivided Urban 333 482.846 0 6 7 13 0.10 0.00 57.15 66.68 123.83 0.26 KY 2238 MP 0.00 - 2.442 0.000 0.400 0.400 8150 4 Divided Urban 330 591.685 0 1 1 2 0.04 0.00 28.01 28.01 56.03 0.09 0.400 2.442 2.042 660 2 Undivided Urban 333 753.837 0 5 7 12 0.01 0.00 338.81 474.33 813.14 1.08 KY 2345 MP 0.000 - 3.316 0.000 0.615 0.615 13400 2 Undivided Urban 333 495.025 0 0 2 2 0.09 0.00 0.00 22.16 22.16 0.04 0.615 0.819 0.204 6,140 2 Undivided Urban 333 770.840 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.819 1.664 0.845 3,020 2 Undivided Urban 333 632.102 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.664 2.167 0.503 2,840 2 Undivided Urban 333 740.817 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.167 3.316 1.149 3,090 2 Undivided Urban 333 584.270 0 0 0 0 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 KY 2924 MP 0.000 - MP 2.757 0.000 0.330 0.330 862 2 Undivided Urban 333 1335.790 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.330 2.757 2.427 934 2 Undivided Urban 333 651.512 1 5 3 9 0.02 40.29 201.44 120.86 362.59 0.56
* Couplet analyzed as a 4-lane divided highway Sources: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database, Kentucky Transportation Center's Analysis of Traffic Accident Data in Kentucky (1995-1999) Accident Spot Analysis (1999-2001) State Maintained Roads (Designated Routes)
Accidents Rates per HMVM or MV Length Number of Rural / Avg. Acc. Critical Acc. Critical Rate Begin MP End MP ADT Divided / Undivided MVM (miles) Lanes Urban Rate Rate Fatal Injury PDO Total Fatal Injury PDO Total Factor
KY 8 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 0.000 0.100 0.100 21,400 3 Undivided Urban 0.49 0.884 0 6 13 19 23.43 0.00 0.26 0.55 0.81 0.92 0.208 0.308 0.100 19,720 4* Divided Urban 0.32 0.657 0 5 25 30 21.59 0.00 0.23 1.16 1.39 2.12 0.315 0.415 0.100 19,720 4* Divided Urban 0.32 0.657 0 6 30 36 21.59 0.00 0.28 1.39 1.67 2.54 0.435 0.535 0.100 16,830 4* Divided Urban 0.32 0.687 0 11 28 39 18.43 0.00 0.60 1.52 2.12 3.08 0.717 0.817 0.100 13,375 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.735 0 2 15 17 14.65 0.00 0.14 1.02 1.16 1.58 0.821 0.921 0.100 20,500 2/4 Undivided/Divided Urban 0.32 0.650 0 2 24 26 22.45 0.00 0.09 1.07 1.16 1.78 0.935 1.035 0.100 20,500 4 Divided Urban 0.32 0.650 0 5 30 35 22.45 0.00 0.22 1.34 1.56 2.40 1.043 1.143 0.100 20,500 4 Divided Urban 0.32 0.650 0 0 7 7 22.45 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.48 1.147 1.247 0.100 24,400 4 Divided/Undivided Urban 0.32 0.621 0 3 14 17 26.72 0.00 0.11 0.52 0.64 1.03 1.268 1.368 0.100 28,300 4/2 Undivided Urban 0.51 0.857 0 4 11 15 30.99 0.00 0.13 0.35 0.48 0.57 1.380 1.480 0.100 28,300 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.598 0 4 10 14 30.99 0.00 0.13 0.32 0.45 0.76 1.488 1.588 0.100 28,300 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.598 0 3 13 16 30.99 0.00 0.10 0.42 0.52 0.86 1.595 1.695 0.100 22,250 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.636 0 4 21 25 24.36 0.00 0.16 0.86 1.03 1.61 1.700 1.800 0.100 16,200 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.694 0 5 14 19 17.74 0.00 0.28 0.79 1.07 1.54 1.838 1.938 0.100 16,200 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.694 0 4 22 26 17.74 0.00 0.23 1.24 1.47 2.11 2.000 2.100 0.100 16,200 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.694 0 4 22 26 17.74 0.00 0.23 1.24 1.47 2.11 3.133 3.233 0.100 1,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.612 0 1 3 4 1.97 0.00 0.51 1.52 2.03 1.26 5.040 5.140 0.100 2,160 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.479 0 1 3 4 2.37 0.00 0.42 1.27 1.69 1.14 5.318 5.418 0.100 2,160 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.479 0 2 7 9 2.37 0.00 0.85 2.96 3.81 2.57 5.423 5.523 0.100 2,160 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.479 0 1 7 8 2.37 0.00 0.42 2.96 3.38 2.29 8.093 8.193 0.100 5,390 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.005 0 2 2 4 5.90 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.68 0.67 8.876 8.976 0.100 5,280 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.013 0 4 9 13 5.78 0.00 0.69 1.56 2.25 2.22 9.195 9.295 0.100 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.867 0 5 3 8 8.83 0.00 0.57 0.34 0.91 1.05 9.436 9.536 0.100 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.867 0 1 3 4 8.83 0.00 0.11 0.34 0.45 0.52 9.595 9.695 0.100 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.867 0 2 3 5 8.83 0.00 0.23 0.34 0.57 0.65 9.895 9.995 0.100 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.867 0 3 1 4 8.83 0.00 0.34 0.11 0.45 0.52 10.498 10.598 0.100 8,060 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.867 0 2 4 6 8.83 0.00 0.23 0.45 0.68 0.78 10.632 10.732 0.100 5,930 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.969 0 4 4 8 6.49 0.00 0.62 0.62 1.23 1.27 10.793 10.893 0.100 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.155 0 1 3 4 4.16 0.00 0.24 0.72 0.96 0.83 10.907 11.007 0.100 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.155 0 3 3 6 4.16 0.00 0.72 0.72 1.44 1.25 11.493 11.593 0.100 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.155 0 2 2 4 4.16 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.96 0.83 11.780 11.880 0.100 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.155 0 1 4 5 4.16 0.00 0.24 0.96 1.20 1.04 11.982 12.082 0.100 3,800 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.155 1 3 0 4 4.16 0.24 0.72 0.00 0.96 0.83 17.601 17.701 0.100 1,055 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.881 0 1 3 4 1.16 0.00 0.87 2.60 3.46 1.84 KY 9 MP 0.000 - MP 17.696 17.978 18.078 0.100 11,400 2 Divided Urban 0.32 0.772 0 14 11 25 12.48 0.00 1.12 0.88 2.00 2.59 18.093 18.193 0.100 11,400 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.772 0 2 10 12 12.48 0.00 0.16 0.80 0.96 1.24 20.052 20.152 0.100 9,030 4 Divided Urban 0.32 0.834 1 3 5 9 9.89 0.10 0.30 0.51 0.91 1.09 KY 10 MP 0.000 - MP 4.423 0.000 0.100 0.100 1,750 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.634 0 1 3 4 1.92 0.00 0.52 1.57 2.09 1.28 0.400 0.500 0.100 1,750 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.634 0 3 1 4 1.92 0.00 1.57 0.52 2.09 1.28 1.000 1.100 0.100 3,090 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.260 0 1 3 4 3.38 0.00 0.30 0.89 1.18 0.94 1.273 1.373 0.100 5,240 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.015 0 0 7 7 5.74 0.00 0.00 1.22 1.22 1.20 1.531 1.631 0.100 7,390 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.894 0 0 9 9 8.09 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.11 1.24 1.64 1.740 0.100 7,390 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.894 0 1 6 7 8.09 0.00 0.12 0.74 0.87 0.97 1.745 1.845 0.100 7,845 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.875 0 0 4 4 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.53 1.976 2.076 0.100 7,075 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.908 0 1 7 8 7.75 0.00 0.13 0.90 1.03 1.14 2.189 2.289 0.100 5,850 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.974 0 3 6 9 6.41 0.00 0.47 0.94 1.40 1.44 4.002 4.102 0.100 5,850 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.974 0 1 4 5 6.41 0.00 0.16 0.62 0.78 0.80 KY 547 MP 0.000 - MP 6.590 2.930 3.030 0.100 2,300 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.260 0 1 4 5 2.52 0.00 0.40 1.59 1.99 1.58 3.332 3.432 0.100 2,300 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.260 0 2 4 6 2.52 0.00 0.79 1.59 2.38 1.89 5.016 5.116 0.100 1,880 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.391 0 5 2 7 2.06 0.00 2.43 0.97 3.40 2.45 KY 824 MP 0.000 - 3.109 0.952 1.052 0.100 1,440 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.593 0 3 2 5 1.58 0.00 1.90 1.27 3.17 1.99 KY 915 MP 0.00 - 9.227 0.153 0.253 0.100 653 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 2.743 0 1 8 9 0.72 0.00 1.40 11.19 12.59 4.59 5.913 6.013 0.100 1,150 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 2.016 0 1 7 8 1.26 0.00 0.79 5.56 6.35 3.15 Accident Spot Analysis (1999-2001) State Maintained Roads (Designated Routes)
Accidents Rates per HMVM or MV Length Number of Rural / Avg. Acc. Critical Acc. Critical Rate Begin MP End MP ADT Divided / Undivided MVM (miles) Lanes Urban Rate Rate Fatal Injury PDO Total Fatal Injury PDO Total Factor
KY 1121, MP 0.000 to MP 10.078 7.125 7.225 0.100 1070 2 Undivided Rural 0.25 1.867 0 2 2 4 1.17 0.00 1.71 1.71 3.41 1.83 KY 1998 MP 0.000 - MP 3.939 0.000 0.100 0.100 4270 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.101 0 0 4 4 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.78 2.813 2.913 0.100 5940 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.968 0 2 2 4 6.50 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.61 0.64 3.376 3.476 0.100 5940 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 0.968 0 3 2 5 6.50 0.00 0.46 0.31 0.77 0.79 KY 2238 MP 0.000 - 2.442 1.165 1.265 0.100 4,110 2 Undivided Urban 0.32 1.118 0 4 2 6 4.50 0.00 0.89 0.44 1.33 1.19
* Couplet analyzed as a 4-lane divided highway Sources: KYTC's Highway Information System (HIS) database, Kentucky Transportation Center's Analysis of Traffic Accident Data in Kentucky (1995-1999) Highway Systems Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
National Truck National Highway Functional Truck Weight Begin MP Begin Route End MP End Route State System Network (NN) System (NHS) Classification Class 4th Street (FS-8149) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 Washington St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA 5th Street (FS-8150) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 Washington St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA Old Dodsworth Pike (FS - 8171) MP 0.000 - MP 2.400 0.000 0.900 Unl Rd. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.900 Unl Rd. 2.400 KY 1998 NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Highland Avenue (FS-8178) MP 0.000 - MP 1.400 0.000 0.500 Grand Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.500 Grand Ave. 0.700 Highview Dr. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.700 Highview Dr. 1.400 KY 1120 NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Ft. Thomas Avenue (FS-8182) MP 0.000 - MP 1.800 0.000 0.500 Southgate Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.500 Southgate Ave. 1.800 Dayton Rd. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Dayton Road (FS-8182) MP 1.800 - MP 2.600 1.800 Dayton Rd. 2.600 7th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 7th Street (FS-8182) MP 2.600 - MP 2.700 2.600 7th St. 2.700 Main St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Main Street (FS-8182) MP 2.700 - MP 2.900 2.700 Main St. 2.900 4th St. NA No No NA NA 11th Street (FS-8183) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 Washington St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Washington Street (FS-8183) MP 0.100 - MP 0.850 0.100 Washington St. 0.400 8th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.400 8th St. 0.700 5th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.700 5th St. 0.800 Southgate St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA 0.800 Southgate St. 0.850 3rd St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA 6th Avenue (FS-8184) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 Main St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Saratoga Street (FS-8187) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.200 9th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.200 9th St. 0.500 5th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.500 5th St. 0.700 KY 8 3rd St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Patterson Street (FS-8188) MP 0.000 - MP 0.644 0.000 0.100 11th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.100 11th St. 0.400 Keturah St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.400 Keturah St. 0.644 5th St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Brighton Street (FS-8189) MP 0.000 - MP 0.114 0.000 0.050 Thorton St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA 0.050 Thorton St. 0.114 11th St. NA No No Urban Minor Arterial NA 0.100 Glazier Ave. 0.300 Taylor Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Taylor Avenue (FS-8191) MP 0.300 - MP 1.200 0.300 Taylor Ave. 0.600 Covert Run NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.600 Covert Run 0.800 Center St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.900 Center St. 1.200 KY 8 Fairfield Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 6th Street (FS-8194) MP 0.000 - MP 0.300 Highway Systems Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
National Truck National Highway Functional Truck Weight Begin MP Begin Route End MP End Route State System Network (NN) System (NHS) Classification Class 0.000 0.300 Washington St. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Grand Avenue (FS-8195) MP 0.000 - MP 0.500 0.000 0.100 Grand Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.100 Grand Ave. 0.500 KY 1120 NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 6th Street (FS-8199) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.300 Linden Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.300 Linden Ave. 0.557 Lafayette Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Covert Run Pike (FS-8199) MP 0.700 - MP 2.400 0.700 Lafayette Ave. 0.800 Southfoot Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 0.800 Southfoot Ave. 1.300 Rossford Rd. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 1.300 Rossford Rd. 2.000 Meadow Ln. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA 2.000 Meadow Ln. 2.400 Ft. Thomas Ave. NA No No Urban Collector Street NA Geometric Characteristics Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) Number of Lanes Lane Width (feet) Shoulder Width (feet) Speed Limit (mph) Roadway Type
4th Street (FS-8149) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 0.171 2 10 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 5th Street (FS-8150) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 2 11 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Old Dodsworth Pike (FS-8171) MP 0.000 - MP 2.400 0.000 0.900 0.900 NA NA NA NA NA 0.900 2.400 1.500 NA NA NA NA NA Highland Avenue (FS-8178) MP 0.000 - MP 1.400 0.000 0.500 0.500 NA NA NA NA NA 0.500 0.700 0.200 NA NA NA NA NA 0.700 1.400 0.700 NA NA NA Ft. Thomas Avenue (FS-8182) MP 0.000 - MP 1.800 0.000 0.500 0.500 2 10 curbed 35 Divided Highway 0.500 1.800 1.300 210NANANA Dayton Road (FS-8182) MP 1.800 - MP 2.600 1.800 2.600 0.800 210NANANA 7th Street (FS-8182) MP 2.600 - MP 2.700 2.600 2.700 0.100 210NANANA Main Street (FS-8182) MP 2.700 - MP 2.900 2.700 2.900 0.200 210NANANA 11th Street (FS-8183) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 2 12 curbed NA NA Washington Street (FS-8183) MP 0.100 - MP 0.850 0.100 0.400 0.300 2 12 NA NA NA 0.400 0.700 0.300 2 12 NA NA NA 0.700 0.800 0.100 2 12 NA 25 Undivided Highway 0.800 0.850 0.050 2 12 NA NA Undivided Highway 6th Avenue (FS-8184) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 NA NA NA NA NA Saratoga Street (FS-8187) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.200 0.200 2 9 NA NA NA 0.200 0.500 0.300 2 9 curbed 25 Divided Highway 0.500 0.700 0.200 2 9 NA NA NA Patterson Street (FS-8188) MP 0.000 - MP 0.644 0.000 0.100 0.100 2 10 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 0.100 0.400 0.300 2 10 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 0.400 0.644 0.244 2 10 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Brighton Street (FS-8189) MP 0.000 - MP 0.114 0.000 0.050 0.050 2 11 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 0.050 0.114 0.064 2 11 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Geometric Characteristics Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) Number of Lanes Lane Width (feet) Shoulder Width (feet) Speed Limit (mph) Roadway Type
Wilson Road (FS-8191) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 2 9 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Glazier Avenue (FS-8191) MP 0.100 - MP 0.300 0.100 0.300 0.200 2 9 NA NA NA Taylor Avenue (FS-8191) MP 0.300 - MP 1.200 0.300 0.600 0.300 2 9 NA NA NA 0.600 0.900 0.300 29NANA NA 0.900 1.200 0.300 2 9 NA NA NA 6th Street (FS-8194) MP 0.000 - MP 0.300 0.000 0.300 0.300 NA NA curbed NA NA Grand Avenue (FS-8195) MP 0.000 - MP 0.500 0.000 0.100 0.100 2 8 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 0.100 0.500 0.400 2 8 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 6th Street (FS-8199) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.300 0.300 2 10 NA NA NA 0.300 0.700 0.400 2 10 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Covert Run Pike (FS-8199) MP 0.700 - MP 2.400 0.700 0.800 0.100 2 9 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 0.800 1.300 0.500 2 9 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 1.300 2.000 0.700 2 9 curbed 25 Undivided Highway 2.000 2.400 0.400 2 9 curbed 25 Undivided Highway Existing Traffic Characteristics Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) % Trucks 2002 ADT 2002 LOS
4th Street (FS-8149) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 0.171 6.90% 8,240 C 5th Street (FS-8150) MP 0.000 - MP 0.171 0.000 0.171 0.171 NA 7,430 B Old Dodsworth Pike (FS-8171) MP 0.000 - MP 2.400 0.000 0.900 0.900 NA 3,960 A 0.900 2.400 1.500 NA 1,590 A Highland Avenue (FS-8178) MP 0.000 - MP 1.400 0.000 0.500 0.500 NA 7,290 B 0.500 0.700 0.200 NA 8,590 C 0.700 1.400 0.700 NA 6,560 B Ft. Thomas Avenue (FS-8182) MP 0.000 - MP 1.800 0.000 0.500 0.500 NA 3,830 A 0.500 1.800 1.300 NA 2,150 A Dayton Road (FS-8182) MP 1.800 - MP 2.600 1.800 2.600 0.800 NA 1,120 A 7th Street (FS-8182) MP 2.600 - MP 2.700 2.600 2.700 0.100 NA 1,320 A Main Street (FS-8182) MP 2.700 - MP 2.900 2.700 2.900 0.200 NA 2,240 A 11th Street (FS-8183) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 NA 5,060 B Washington Street (FS-8183) MP 0.100 - MP 0.850 0.100 0.400 0.300 NA 5,170 B 0.400 0.700 0.300 NA 4,320 A 0.700 0.800 0.100 NA 7,310 B 0.800 0.850 0.050 NA 12,000 C 6th Avenue (FS-8184) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 NA 3,360 A Saratoga Street (FS-8187) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.200 0.200 NA 3,520 A 0.200 0.500 0.300 NA 2,800 A 0.500 0.700 0.200 NA 1,210 A Patterson Street (FS-8188) MP 0.000 - MP 0.644 0.000 0.100 0.100 NA 2,790 A 0.100 0.400 0.300 NA 2,270 A 0.400 0.644 0.244 NA 1,740 A Brighton Street (FS-8189) MP 0.000 - MP 0.114 0.000 0.050 0.050 NA 4,910 B 0.050 0.114 0.064 NA 2,160 A Wilson Road (FS-8191) MP 0.000 - MP 0.100 0.000 0.100 0.100 NA 4,430 A Glazier Avenue (FS-8191) MP 0.100 - MP 0.300 0.100 0.300 0.200 NA 2,690 A Taylor Avenue (FS-8191) MP 0.300 - MP 1.200 0.300 0.600 0.300 NA 3,260 A 0.600 0.900 0.300 NA 2,890 A 0.900 1.200 0.300 NA 3,550 A Existing Traffic Characteristics Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
Begin MP End MP Length (miles) % Trucks 2002 ADT 2002 LOS
6th Street (FS-8194) MP 0.000 - MP 0.300 0.000 0.300 0.300 NA 4,610 A Grand Avenue (FS-8195) MP 0.000 - MP 0.500 0.000 0.100 0.100 1.20% 4,110 A 0.100 0.500 0.400 NA 552 A 6th Street (FS-8199) MP 0.000 - MP 0.700 0.000 0.300 0.300 NA 5,000 B 0.300 0.700 0.400 NA 7,930 C Covert Run Pike (FS-8199) MP 0.700 - MP 2.400 0.700 0.800 0.100 NA 3,520 A 0.800 1.300 0.500 NA 2,920 A 1.300 2.000 0.700 NA 1,340 A 2.000 2.400 0.400 NA 1,470 A Accident Segment Analysis (1999-2001) Locally Maintained Functionally Classified
Length Number Divided / Rural / Accidents Begin MP End MP ADT (miles) of Lanes Undivide Urban Fatal Injury PDO Total 4th Street (FS-8149) 0.000 0.171 0.171 7,810 2 Undivided Urban 0 7 31 38 5th Street (FS-8150) 0.000 0.171 0.171 7,310 2 Undivided Urban 0 4 57 61 Old Dodsworth Pike (FS-8171) 0.000 2.400 2.400 3,530 2 Undivided Urban 0000 Highland Avenue (FS-8178) 0.000 1.400 1.400 7,597 2 Undivided Urban 0 8 65 73 Ft. Thomas Avenue (FS-8182) 0.000 1.800 1.800 3,065 2 Undivided Urban 0 7 82 89 Dayton Road (FS- 8182) 1.800 2.600 0.800 1,140 2 Undivided Urban 0000 7th Street (FS-8182) 2.600 2.700 0.100 1,380 2 Undivided Urban 0 0 32 32 Main Street (FS-8182) 2.700 2.900 0.200 2,280 2 Undivided Urban 0 2 33 35 11th Street (FS-8183) 0.000 0.100 0.100 4,650 2 Undivided Urban 0 7 29 36 Washington Street (FS-8183) 0.100 0.850 0.750 7,173 2 Undivided Urban 0044 6th Avenue (FS-8184) 0.000 0.100 0.100 3,420 2 Undivided Urban 0000 Saratoga Street (FS-8187) 0.000 0.700 0.700 2,893 2 Undivided Urban 0 8 36 44 Patterson Street (FS-8188) 0.000 0.644 0.644 2,220 2 Undivided Urban 0 2 31 33 Brighton Street (FS-8189) 0.000 0.300 0.300 3,610 2 Undivided Urban 0 2 34 36 Taylor Avenue (FS-8191) 0.300 1.200 0.900 3,197 2 Undivided Urban 0 10 64 74 6th Street (FS-8194) 0.000 0.300 0.300 8,145 2 Undivided Urban 0000 Grand Avenue (FS-8195) 0.000 0.500 0.500 2,358 2 Undivided Urban 0 4 30 34 Covert Run Pike (FS 8199) 0.700 2.400 1.700 2,300 2 Undivided Urban 0022 CAMPBELL COUNTY APPENDIX C
CONTENTS
Survey Form for Campbell County Transportation Plan
County Road Scoring Guide for Field Survey
Physical Characteristics Score Table (All County Roads)
Measures of Effectiveness Scoring Guide
Measures of Effectiveness Score Table (All County Roads)
New Campbell County Street Names
COUNTY ROAD SCORING GUIDE FOR FIELD SURVEY
Bridge Width Two lane road/two lane bridge Road Width > 24 ft 0 pts. (road more narrow than bridge) 1 pts. 18 to 24 ft. 1 One lane road/one lane bridge 2 15 to 18 ft. 2 Two lane road/one lane bridge 3 < 15 ft. 3
Road Surface Asphalt 1 pts. Road Condition Excellent 1 Concrete 1 Good 2 Gravel 3 Fair 3 Cobblestone 4 Poor 4 Other 5
Pavement Markings Good 1 On-Street Parking Good 1 Fair 2 Fair 2 Poor 3 Poor 3 None 4 None 4
Shoulder Asphalt 1 Traffic Control Devices Signal 1 Concrete 1 Stop Sign 2 Curb and Gutter 1 Caution 3 Gravel 2 None 4 None 3
Sight Distance Adequate 1 Horizontal Alignment Adequate 1 Inadequate 2 Inadequate 2
Vertical Alignment None 1 Lateral Clearance Adequate 1 Excess Grades 2 Inadequate 2
Drainage Notes 1 General Notes 1
Lighting Continuous 1 Drainage Curb/Gutter 1 Intersection Only 2 Ditch/Swale 2 Isolated 3 Obvious None 4 Problems 3 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS SCORE TABLE (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k ( l l e e e g s o r m a a i e i t o o l c c r e t a n h h r r c t i o t t t t n n a M A h g P l o a d i t d d n n N f a a l l e t s i i t l a n s t t r d t o o N n a t i r A e s s e e o t u C l i i n W W e e l o C C e g g g n l a W S C r d D D a T r n a a e e t l o s m c c a i l i i c t t r d d d t e - g g u n n z i me e f f S i i i f f t a h h e a a - h n a r b v d d o r g t t i i a a a a g g n g o o o r r o e a r r h i i e u e r r o i a
R R R P B B O S T T S S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
1 CR1235 Visalia Rd 3124224 3 2212 421222142 42 2 CR1228 Lees Rd 3124224 3 2212 421222142 42 3 CR1357 Steffen 3144004 3 4420 420222041 41 4 CR1127a Harrisburg Hill Rd 3134004 3 2412 421222141 41 5 CR1301 Gilbert Ridge 6278208 6 6822 840433281 2 40.5 6 CR1022 Lower Tug Fork 3124224 3 4221 420111140 40 7 CR1017 Gunkel Road 3144004 3 4411 420121140 40
8 CR1127A Picnic Road 3144004 3 4421 420111140 40 9 CR1131 Wish Road 3144004 3 2411 421212140 40 10 CR1017A Ritter Lane 3144004 3 4411 420111139 39 11 CR1214 Aulick Road 3144204 3 2211 420212038 38 12 CR1321 Gary Lane 2144004 3 2421 420121138 38 13 CR1134 Haubner Road 3144004 3 2411 420112138 38 14 CR1103B Spur Road 2134004 3 4421 420111138 38 15 CR1207B Old KY 824 3144004 3 2411 421111138 38 16 CR1120A Fisher Road 936120012 9 10 10 3 4 12 6 05552113 3 37.7 17 CR1239 Indian Trace 4268308 6 6221 852424275 2 37.5 18 CR1103A Gubser Mill 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 19 CR1133 Decker Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 20 CR1325 Blangey Road 3144004 3 2411 421111037 37 21 CR1013A Burger Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 22 CR1018 Dobbling Lane 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 23 CR1016 Mystic Rose 4288008 6 6822 840232174 2 37 24 CR1110 Kennedy Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37
25 CR1005 Branch Lick Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 26 CR1219 Morning View 3144004 3 2020 431222037 37 27 CR1009 Neises Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 28 CR1105 Oregon Landing 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 29 CR1021 Owl Creek 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 30 CR1002 Reiley Road 3144004 3 2411 420111137 37 31 CR1223 Wolf Rd 3134004 3 4211 420112137 37 32 CR1114 Baynum Hill 3134004 3 2411 420111136 36 33 CR1132 Bob White Lane 3134004 3 2411 420121036 36 34 CR1112 Daniels Road 3134004 3 2212 420121136 36 35 CR1033A Black Road 3134004 3 2411 420121036 36 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k ( l l e e e g s o r m a a i e i t o o l c c r e t a n h h r r c t i o t t t t n n a M A h g P o a d i t d d n n N l f a a l l e t s i i t l n s t t r d t N o o a n a i r A e s s e e o t t u C l i i n W W e e l C C e g g g n l o a W S C r d D D a r n a a e e t l o s m c c a i T l i i c t t r d d d t e - g g u n n z i me e f f S i i i f f t a h h e a a - h n a r b v d d o r g t t i i a a a a g g n g o o o r r o e a r r h i i e u e r r o i a
R R R P B B O S T T S S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
36 CR1125 Wagoner Road 5268008 6 6822 840222172 2 36 37 CR1013 Vineyard Lane 3144004 3 2211 420121136 36 38 CR1247 Krift Road 0344004 3 2411 420111136 36 39 CR1248 Parklake Road 4258008 6 8822 841222072 2 36 40 CR1313 Messmer Hill 3144004 3 2421 020222036 36 41 CR1201 Moreland Road 3134004 3 2411 420121036 36 42 CR1349 Dry Creek Road 4268368 6 2221 841224172 2 36
43 CR1116 Reis Ridge 5248008 6 8822 840222172 2 36 44 CR1117 Ries Lane 3124004 3 4411 420111036 36 45 CR1126 Shaw Hess Road 4268008 6 6522 840432272 2 36 46 CR1110A W. Kennedy 3144004 3 2411 420111036 36 47 CR1124 Wagoner Road 2134004 3 2411 420121136 36 48 CR1100 Barrs Branch 4248308 6 6622 841222171 2 35.5 49 CR1129 Cryer Road 1134004 3 2421 420111135 35 50 CR1238 W. Miller Rd 5248308 6 6020 861334170 2 35 51 CR1115 Shaw Goetz Road 4248008 6 6623 840223270 2 35 52 CR1012 Ten Mile Road 5248208 6 5822 840222070 2 35 53 CR1221 Bakersfield Rd 2124304 3 202 421112135 35 54 CR1120 Bezold Road 2124004 3 4211 420211135 35 55 CR1234 Losey 1124004 3 4211 420212135 35 56 CR1214A Muinn Rd 3044004 3 2010 421222135 35 57 CR1211 Nagel Road 4258008 6 6422 842232270 2 35 58 CR1308 Old State #1E 3134004 3 2411 420111035 35 59 CR1355 Rifle Range 5178008 6 6030 842334270 2 35
60 CR1113 Schababerle Hill 4248008 6 6622 840242270 2 35 61 CR1212A Short Fairlane 3144004 3 2211 420111135 35 62 CR1024 Upper Tug Fork 738120012 9 8833 12 6 23432105 3 35 63 CR1118 Plum Creek Road 4258008 6 8622 830222169 2 34.5 64 CR1316 Dodsworth Lane 2255308 6 6632 842222169 2 34.5 65 CR1025 Heck Road 5248008 6 6822 840222069 2 34.5 66 CR1306B Low Gap East 5248008 6 6822 840222069 2 34.5 67 CR1026 Reitman Road 3248008 6 8622 840232169 2 34.5 68 CR1023 Darlington Road 3124004 3 2411 420111034 34 69 CR1127 Sheanshang Road 3124004 3 2411 420111034 34 70 CR1222 Boone Smith Rd 1134004 3 2211 420212134 34 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k ( l l e e e g s o r m a a i e i t o o l c c r e t a n h h r r c t i o t t t t n n a M A h g P l o a d i t d d n n N f a a l l e t s i i t l a n s t t r d t o o N n a t i r A e s s e e o t u C l i i n W W e e l o C C e g g g n l a W S C r d D D a T r n a a e e t l o s m c c a i l i i c t t r d d d t e - g g u n n z i me e f f S i i i f f t a h h e a a - h n a r b v d d o r g t t i i a a a a g g n g o o o r r o e a r r h i i e u e r r o i a
R R R P B B O S T T S S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
71 CR1354 Trapp Rd 3144004 3 4010 420111134 34 72 CR1348 Bunning Lane 3014004 3 4410 421201034 34 73 CR1014 Chalk Road 3124004 3 2411 420111034 34 74 CR1215 Demossville Rd 3132004 3 2010 431222134 34 75 CR1238 E Miller Rd 3544000 3 1410 420111034 34 76 CR1212 Fairlane Rd 4248008 6 8422 840224068 2 34 77 CR1003 Grandview Road 2124004 3 4211 420121034 34
78 CR1209B Herringer Road 3134004 3 2211 421111034 34 79 CR1323 Holtz Drive 3124004 3 2411 420111034 34 80 CR1509 Kellie Lane 1124004 3 4411 420111034 34 81 CR1365 Martin Road 2144004 3 4010 420112134 34 82 CR1028 Neltner Road 1124004 3 4411 420111034 34 83 CR1207D Old KY 9 2134004 3 4211 420111034 34 84 CR1257 Tarvin Road 0144004 3 2211 431102134 34 85 CR1351 Tippenhaure rd 6158008 6 6020 841444168 2 34 86 CR1004 Upper Lick Branch 2124004 3 2211 420122134 34 87 CR1318 Weaver Lane 3124004 3 2411 420111034 34 88 CR1029 Fausz Road 5248008 6 4811 840242067 2 33.5 89 CR1010 Truesdell 4258008 6 4422 840332267 2 33.5 90 CR1216 Hissem Rd 738123012 9 6231 12 7 15360100 3 33.3 91 CR1121 Burns Road 63780012 9 10 6 4 3 12 6 0333196 3 33 92 CR1367 Cutters Trace 1114004 3 4411 420111033 33 93 CR1375 Enzweiler Road 1124004 3 2411 420111133 33 94 CR1123 Flatwoods Road 2134004 3 2211 420111133 33
95 CR1255 John Miller Rd 2124004 3 2010 431222033 33 96 CR1366 Lakewood Drive 1114004 3 2411 421111133 33 97 CR1003A Lower Grandview 2034004 3 2411 420111033 33 98 CR1356 Poplar Thicket 6178008 6 6030 840323166 2 33 99 CR1232 Phillips Road 3278008 6 4020 851334266 2 33 100 CR1353 Murnan Road 3124004 3 2020 420222033 33 101 CR1106 Union Street 2134004 3 2411 320111033 33 102 CR1104 Washington Trace 527120012 9 6633 12 6 0553298 3 32.7 103 CR1206 Woeste Road 638120012 9 6833 12 6 1333098 3 32.7 104 CR1217 Clay Ridge 13 6 14 13 0 0 24 18 22 7 6 7 24 13 277121196 6 32.6 105 CR1101 Lick Hill Road 6168008 6 4622 820222065 2 32.5 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k ( l l e e e g s o r m a a i e i t o o l c c r e t a n h h r r c t i o t t t t n n a M A h g P l o a d i t d d n n N f a a l l e t s i i t l a n s t t r d t o o N n a t i r A e s s e e o t u C l i i n W W e e l o C C e g g g n l a W S C r d D D a T r n a a e e t l o s m c c a i l i i c t t r d d d t e - g g u n n z i me e f f S i i i f f t a h h e a a a - h n v r b d d o r g t t i i a a a a g g n g o o o r r o e a r r h i i e u e r r o i a
R R R P B B O S T T S S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
106 CR1208 Siry Road 4258008 6 4422 840232165 2 32.5 107 CR1102 Dead Timber Road 637110012 9 6833 12 6 0353097 3 32 108 CR1330 Covert Run Pike 1134004 3 2211 420111132 32 109 CR1337 Eustace Avenue 2134002 3 2411 420111032 32 110 CR1207 Golf Course Entrance 1124004 3 2411 420111032 32 111 CR1130 Koehler Road 3144004 2 2211 421000132 32 112 CR1306a Low Gap West 1143004 3 2211 420111132 32
113 CR1236 Maddox Rd 2114004 3 2010 421222132 32 114 CR1311 Ripple Creek North 2134004 3 2010 421112132 32 115 CR1377 Rocky View Drive 1124004 3 2411 420111032 32 116 CR1119 Yelton Hill 1124004 3 2212 420111132 32 117 CR1310 Ripple Creek 4268008 6 6030 840303263 2 31.5 118 CR1011 Fender Road 46124009 10 83312 604433293 3 31 119 CR1209A Old US 27 1124004 3 2211 421111031 31 120 CR1374 Cabin Creek East 1124004 3 2411 410111031 31 121 CR1205 Craft Road 636120012 9 8833 860333093 3 31 122 CR1218 Griffin Ford Rd 3144004 3 201 420111031 31 123 CR1237a Madonna Ln 2258008 6 4231 851223062 2 31 124 CR1361 Scenic Drive 1124004 3 2411 410111031 31 125 CR1202 Lickert Road 326110012 9 7833 12 6 0333091 3 30.3 126 CR1224 Pleasant Ridge 44880016 12 8845 16 8 14482120 4 30 127 CR1246 Bob Huber Drive 1124004 0 2411 420111130 30 128 CR1336 Crowell Avenue 1134001 3 4411 310111030 30 129 CR1251 Milton Ln 3124004 3 2010 421111030 30
130 CR1250 Morvue 2268008 6 4020 841232260 2 30 131 CR1350 Murnan 62690012 9 8541 12 6 0343090 3 30 132 CR1027 Poplar Ridge 33611008 9 9533 12 6 0353190 3 30 133 CR1359 Royal Avenue 1114001 3 4411 420111030 30 134 CR1372 Sunrise Road 1124001 3 2411 420111130 30 135 CR1015 Nine Mile Road 1122004 3 2211 420121130 30 136 CR1103 California Crossroad 4 6 13 13 0 1 24 18 18 16 6 6 24 12 06660179 6 29.8 137 CR1252 Oak Lane 5248007 6 6020 840222159 2 29.5 138 CR1200 Jerry Wright 2124004 1 2211 420111029 29 139 CR1305 Backus Drive 1124001 3 2411 420111029 29 140 CR1360 Blossom Lane 1122004 3 2211 420111129 29 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k ( l l e e e g s o r m a a i e i t o o l c c r e t a n h h r r c t i o t t t t n n a M A h g P l o a d i t d d n n N f a a l l e t s i i t l a n s t t r d t o o N n a t i r A e s s e e o t u C l i i n W W e e l o C C e g g g n l a W S C r d D D a T r n a a e e t l o s m c c a i l i i c t t r d d d t e - g g u n n z i me e f f S i i i f f t a h h e a a - h n a r b v d d o r g t t i i a a a a g g n g o o o r r o e a r r h i i e u e r r o i a
R R R P B B O S T T S S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
141 CR1032A Gresskamp Road 2124002 3 2211 420111029 29 142 CR1253 Henry Ct 3124004 3 2010 420111029 29 143 CR1111 Ivor Road 2244008 6 4622 840222058 2 29 144 CR1033 Eight Mile Road 1121004 3 2211 420121129 29 145 CR1501 Thelma Lee Drive 0124004 3 1411 310121029 29 146 CR1370 Williams Lane 1121004 3 2411 420111029 29 147 CR1312 Uhl Road 549160016 12 10 12 4 4 0804551115 4 28.75
148 CR1317 Skyline Drive 53660012 9 8123 3 460333086 3 28.7 149 CR1230 Hillview Rd 0248006 4 6821 830202157 2 28.5 150 CR1237e Cedar Ln 2124004 3 2010 420111028 28 151 CR1499 Marie Dr 2024004 3 2010 420111128 28 152 CR1307 Old state #1W 3114004 3 2010 420111028 28 153 CR1220 Smith Hiteman Rd 1124004 3 2010 420112028 28 154 CR1512 Awesome Place 1 14004 3 401 420101127 27 155 CR1510 Darlas Drive 0114004 3 2411 120111027 27 156 CR1304 East Alexandria Pike 03660012 7 7733 12 6 0333081 3 27 157 CR1030 Nelson Road (loop) 2242008 6 4422 840222054 2 27 158 CR1502 Williams Ridge 1114004 3 2010 420112027 27 159 CR1243 Echo Hills 2228008 6 4422 240223053 2 26.5 160 CR1343a Furlong Drive 1134000 3 2211 410111026 26 161 CR1504 East Hickory Court 0114004 3 2411 010111025 25 162 CR1369 Joann Ln 0124002 1 4010 411111125 25 163 CR1379 Labrador Ln 1114002 1 2211 410111125 25 164 CR1368 Royal Oak 1124002 1 2010 411121125 25
165 CR1382A South Sun Valley 0114004 3 2411 010111025 25 166 CR1371 South Licking Rd 449120016 12 14 2 1 1 440484099 4 24.75 167 CR1207A Parkside Drive 0114004 3 2211 110111024 24 168 CR1311b Blossom Dr 1134002 1 201 410101123 23 169 CR138 Laurnen Ln 114002 3 2010 420111023 23 170 CR1258 Schweitzer Ct 0124002 1 2010 411111123 23 171 CR1378 Mallard Dr 1114002 1 0210 410111122 22 172 CR1500 Pintail Ct 1114002 1 201 410111122 22 173 CR1503 Cedar Trail 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 174 CR1230 Crestview 1124002 1 2010 410101021 21 175 CR1383 Deer Run 0124002 1 2010 410111021 21 PHYSICAL ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
)
e
g
d
i
r
b
s s
e e d t
c c n n s i i
o v v e g t
g c e e e n n
i m n e c i e D k D s n n s n r k e ( l l e e g s o r m a a c i e i t o o l c r e t a n h h r r c n t i o t t t t n a M A h g P l a o a d i t d d n n N f s t a l l e t s i i t l a n t r r d t o o s N n a t i i A e s e e o t u e C l i n W W e l o C C e g g g n d D l a W S C r l D a T r n a a e e t o s m c c t a i l u i i c t r d d d t e - g g n n z i me e f f S h i i i o f f t a h e a a a - h n v d d r b g r g t t i i a a h a a i g n g o o o r r o e a r r i e u e r r o i a
S S
R R R P B B O T T S L D D H V L G S S T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name
176 CR1506 Doubletree Lane 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 177 CR1507 Magnolia 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 178 CR1382 North Sun Valley 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 179 CR1381 Stoneybrook Court 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 180 CR1508 Sugar Mill Drive 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 181 CR1505 West Hickory 0114000 3 2411 010111021 21 182 CR1376 Marl-Rich 2114002 1 0110 120121020 20
183 CR1373 Ruschman 0114001 1 2010 410111120 20
MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SCORING GUIDE
Four (4) evaluation criteria are utilized in the scoring process for Measures of Effectiveness. Scores in these categories, as indicated on the table, have been weighted based on the survey completed by the Task Force.
1. Safety
Safety incorporates accidents for a roadway as the measure. Physical damage and injury accidents are scored as follows. Scores are increased for a location which experiences a fatal accident. A maximum of 30 points is awarded based on the number of accidents and the number of accidents with injuries. Additionally, and as noted separately on the matrix locations with fatalities receive a higher score that may be as much as fifteen points for a location with more than two accidents.
Accidents Accidents (with injuries add) 1-5 5 1-5 5 6-20 10 6-10 10 > 20 15 > 10 15
Accidents (with fatalities add) 1 5 2 10 > 2 15
2. Community Development and Economic Vitality
The Community and Economic Vitality criterion awards points for projects that serve urban areas/population clusters or the urban service area, serve business/industrial areas, and/or that improve access to the major road system. Points were awarded as follows: Urban Service Area/Cities or Population Clusters = 5 points; Serve Business or Industrial District = 3 points; Improve Access to Major Road System = 3 points.
3. Environmental Impacts
The Environmental Impacts criterion addresses impacts on the natural environment, historic/cultural impacts and the renewed emphasis on environmental justice. This is a subjective evaluation. Projects are awarded points as follows: Positive impact =10 points; No impact = 5 points; Negative impact = -5 points.
4. Multimodal/Intermodal Enhancement
The Multimodal/Intermodal Enhancement criterion awards points based on the project’s ability to include and/or enhance more than the primary mode. If the proposed project facilitates integration and/or connectivity, or includes design elements for more than one transportation mode, the project is awarded five (5) points.
MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SCORE TABLE (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
t A
s
e
T u
d d L
S d N a o
A n T s E r Y o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R c i L T r i I l o I C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t a t L
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r t m I T F I D t l T / e s s t E D e c A i C s t e d h M s L N c i a t r C s s i D e Y e a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O s N I c a s H l s e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i B c v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
1. CR1304 East Alexandria Pike 30 - 5 3 3 - - -5 5 41 2. CR1330 Covert Run Pike 30 - 5 3 3 - - -5 - 36 3. CR1100 Barrs Branch 15 - 5 3 - 5 - 5 33 4. CR1202 Lickert Road 15- 5-3 -5- 533 5. CR1224 Pleasant Ridge 155 5-3 -5- -33 6. CR1103 California Crossroad 25 - --- - 5 - - 30 7. CR1350 Murnan 10- 5-3 -5- 528
8. CR1027 Poplar Ridge 15 - 5 3 3 - - -5 5 26 9. CR1301 Gilbert Ridge 10 5 5 - - - 5 - - 25 10. CR1217 Clay Ridge 15- --3 -5- -23 11. CR1205 Craft Road 10- 5-3 -5- -23 12. CR1257 Tarvin Road 10- 5-3 -5- -23 13. CR1015 Nine Mile Road 15- --3 -5- -23 14. CR1104 Washington Trace 15- --3 -5- -23 15. CR1371 South Licking Rd - - 533 -5- 521 16. CR1222 Boone Smith Rd 10 - 5 - - - 5 - - 20 17. CR1121 Burns Road 10 - 5 - - - 5 - - 20 18. CR1248 Parklake Road 15 - 5 - - - 0 - - 20 19. CR1237A Madonna Ln 10 - 5 - - - 5 - - 20 20. CR1030 Nelson Road (loop) 15 - --- - 5 - - 20 21. CR1368 Royal Oak 10 - 5 - - 5 - - 20 22. CR1317 Skyline Drive 10 - 5 - - - 5 - - 20 23. CR1351 Tippenhaure rd 15 - --- - 5 - - 20 24. CR1010 Truesdell 10 5 --- - 5 - - 20
25. CR1223 Wolf Rd 10 5 --- - 5 - - 20 26. CR1102 Dead Timber Road 10- --3 -5- -18 27. CR1316 Dodsworth Lane 15 - 5 - 3 - - -5 - 18 28. CR1003 Grandview Road 5- 5-3 -5- -18 29. CR1033 Eight Mile Road 15- --3 -0- -18 30. CR1211 Nagel Road 10- --3 -5- -18 31. CR1207D Old KY 9 5- 53- -5- -18 32. CR1312 Uhl Road 15 - 5 3 - - -5 - 18 33. CR1360 Blossom Lane 5- 5-- -5- -15 34. CR1246 Bob Huber Drive 5- 5-- -5- -15 * A score of 0 indicates roads that are 20 feet or more in width and that have been rated for Excellent pavement MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
A t
s
e
T u
d d L
S N d
a o
A n T s E Y r o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n
e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R i L T c I l r i o I
C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t t L a
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r m I T F I D t t l T / e s t E D s e c A i C s t e d h M s N L c i a t C r i s s e Y e D a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O N s I c a s H
s l e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i c B v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p
d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
35 CR1348 Bunning Lane 5- 5-- -5- -15 36 CR1374 Cabin Creek East 5- 5-- -5- -15 37 CR1216 Hissem Rd 10 - --- - 5 - - 15 38 CR1200 Jerry Wright 5- 5-- -5- -15 39 CR1236 Martin Road 5- 5-- -5- -15 40 CR1206 Woeste Road -- 5-- -5- 515 41 CR1002 Reiley Road 10 - --- - 5 - - 15
42 CR1026 Reitman Road 10 - --- - 5 - - 15 43 CR1115 Shaw Goetz Road 10 - --- - 5 - - 15 44 CR1024 Upper Tug Fork 5- 5-- -5- -15 45 CR1207 Golf Course Entrance -- 53- -5- -13 46 CR1111 Ivor Road 5- --3 -5- -13 47 CR1306a Low Gap West -- 5-3 -5- -13 48 CR1349 Dry Creek Road 5- 5-3 ---5 513 49 CR1311 Ripple Creek North -- 5-3 -5- -13 50 CR1113 Schababerle Hill 5- --3 -5- -13 51 CR1370 Williams Lane 5- --3 -5- -13 52 CR1305 Backus Drive -- 5 -5- -10 53 CR1325 Blangey Road -- 5-- -5- -10 54 CR1311B Blossom Dr -- 5-- -5- -10 55 CR1336 Crowell Avenue 5- --- -5- -10 56 CR1510 Darlas Drive -- 5-- -5- -10 57 CR1125 Wagoner Road 5- --- -5- -10 58 CR1238 E Miller Rd 5- --- -5- -10
59 CR1337 Eustace Avenue 5- --- -5- -10 60 CR1212 Fairlane Rd 5- --- -5- -10 61 CR1017 Gunkel Road 5- --- -5- -10 62 CR1025 Heck Road 5- --- -5- -10 63 CR1253 Henry Ct 5- --- -5- -10 64 CR1209B Herringer Road 5- --- -5- -10 65 CR1230 Hillview Rd 5- --- -5- -10 66 CR1323 Holtz Drive -- 5-- -5- -10 67 CR1247 Krift Road -- 5-- -5- -10 68 CR1365 Maddox Drive -- 5-- -5- -10 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
A t
s
e
T u
d d L
S N d
a o
A n T s E Y r o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n
e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R i L T c I l r i o I
C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t t L a
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r m I T F I D t t l T / e s t E D s e c A i C s t e d h M s N L c i a t C r i s s e Y e D a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O N s I c a s H
s l e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i c B v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p
d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
69 CR1201 Moreland Road 5- --- -5- -10 70 CR1028 Neltner Road 5- --- -5- -10 71 CR1252 Oak Lane 5- --- -5- -10 72 CR1308 Old State #1E -- 5-- -5- -10 73 CR1243 Echo Hills 5- 5-- -0- -10 74 CR1310 Ripple Creek -- 5-- -5- -10 75 CR1377 Rocky View Drive -- 5- -5- -10
76 CR1361 Scenic Drive -- 5- -5- -10 77 CR1232 Phillips Road -- 5- -5- -10 78 CR1126 Shaw Hess Road -- 5-- -5- -10 79 CR1372 Sunrise Road 5- --- -5- -10 80 CR1012 Ten Mile Road 15------5-10 81 CR1004 Upper Lick Branch -- 5-- -5- -10 82 CR1235 Visalia Rd 5- --- -5- -10 83 CR1131 Wish Road 5 --- -5- -10 84 CR1120 Bezold Road -- --3 -5- - 8 85 CR1112 Daniels Road -- --3 -5- - 8 86 CR1120A Fisher Road -- --3 -5- - 8 87 CR1123 Flatwoods Road -- --3 -5- - 8 88 CR1110 Kennedy Road -- --3 -5- - 8 89 CR1101 Lick Hill Road -- --3 -5- - 8 90 CR1022 Lower Tug Fork 10 - - - 3 - - -5 - 8 91 CR1118 Plum Creek Road -- --3 -5- - 8 92 CR1208 Siry Road -- --3 -5- - 8
93 CR1119 Yelton Hill -- --3 -5- - 8 94 CR1221 Bakersfield Rd ------5- - 5 95 CR1114 Baynum Hill ------5- - 5 96 CR1133 Decker Road ------5- - 5 97 CR1132 Bob White Lane ------5- - 5 98 CR1237E Cedar Ln ------5- - 5 99 CR1014 Schalk Road ------5- - 5 100 CR1230A Crestview ------5- - 5 101 CR1129 Cryer Road ------5- - 5 102 CR1214 Aulick Road ------5- - 5 103 CR1023 Darlington Road ------5- - 5 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
A t
s
e
T u
d d L
S N d
a o
A n T s E Y r o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n
e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R i L T c I l r i o I
C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t t L a
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r m I T F I D t t l T / e s t E D s e c A i C s t e d h M s N L c i a t C r i s s e Y e D a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O N s I c a s H
s l e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i c B v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p
d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
104 CR1033A Black Road ------5- - 5 105 CR1383 Deer Run ------5- - 5 106 CR1215 Demossville Rd ------5- - 5 107 CR1018 Dobbling Lane ------5- - 5 108 CR1506 Doubletree Lane -- 5-- -0- - 5 109 CR1029 Fausz Road ------5- - 5 110 CR1321 Gary Lane ------5- - 5
111 CR1218 Griffin Ford Rd ------5- - 5 112 CR1103A Gubser Mill ------5- - 5 113 CR1017A Ritter Lane ------5- - 5 114 CR1016 Mystic Rose ------5- - 5 115 CR1013 Vineyard Lane ------5- - 5 116 CR1127A Harrisburg Hill Rd ------5- - 5 117 CR1134 Haubner Road ------5- - 5 118 CR1239 Indian Trace ------5- - 5 119 CR1369 Joann Ln ------5- - 5 120 CR1255 John Miller Rd ------5- - 5 121 CR1509 Kellie Lane ------5- - 5 122 CR1379 Labrador Ln -- 5-- -0- - 5 123 CR1228 Lees Rd ------5- - 5 124 CR1234 Losey ------5- - 5 125 CR1003A Lower Grandview ------5- - 5 126 CR1005 Branch Lick Road ------5- - 5 127 CR1499 Marie Dr ------5- - 5
128 CR1313 Messmer Hill ------5- - 5 129 CR1251 Milton Ln ------5- - 5 130 CR1250 Morvue ------5- - 5 131 CR1214A Muinn Rd ------5- - 5 132 CR1009 Neises Road ------5- - 5 133 CR1103B Spur Road ------5- - 5 134 CR1207B Old KY 824 ------5- - 5 135 CR1307 Old state #1W -- 5-- -0- - 5 136 CR1209A Old US 27 ------5- - 5 137 CR1207A Parkside Drive -- 5-- -0- - 5 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
A t
s
e
T u
d d L
S N d
a o
A n T s E Y r o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n
e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R i L T c I l r i o I
C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t t L a
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r m I T F I D t t l T / e s t E D s e c A i C s t e d h M s N L c i a t C r i s s e Y e D a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O N s I c a s H
s l e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i c B v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p
d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
138 CR1356 Poplar Thicket 10------5- 5 139 CR1116 Reis Ridge ------5- - 5 140 CR1117 Reis Lane ------5- - 5 141 CR1355 Rifle Range 10------5- 5 142 CR1258 Schweitzer Ct ------5- - 5 143 CR1127 Sheanshang Road ------5- - 5 144 CR1127A Picnic Road ------5- - 5
145 CR1212A Short Fairlane ------5- - 5 146 CR1220 Smith Hiteman Rd ------5- - 5 147 CR1381 Stoneybrook Court -- 5-- -0- - 5 148 CR1508 Sugar Mill Drive -- 5-- -0- - 5 149 CR1501 Thelma Lee Drive -- 5-- -0- - 5 150 CR1353 Murnan Road ------5- - 5 151 CR1110A W. Kennedy ------5- - 5 152 CR1238 W. Miller Rd ------5- - 5 153 CR1124 Wagoner Road ------5- - 5 154 CR1505 West Hickory -- 5-- -0- - 5 155 CR1502 Williams Ridge -- 5-- -0- - 5 156 CR1375 Enzweiler Road -- 5-3 -0-5- 3 157 CR1512 Awesome Place ------0- - 0 158 CR1032A Gresskamp Road 5------5- 0 159 CR1503 Cedar Trail ------0- - 0 160 CR1367 Cutters Trace ------0- - 0 161 CR1504 East Hickory Court ------0- - 0
162 CR1011 Fender Road 5------5- 0 163 CR1366 Lakewood Drive ------0- - 0 164 CR138 Lauren Ln ------0- - 0 165 CR1306B Low Gap East -- 5-- ---5- 0 166 CR1507 Magnolia ------0- - 0 167 CR1378 Mallard Dr ------0- - 0 168 CR1376 Marl-Rich ------0- - 0 169 CR1382 North Sun Valley ------0- - 0 170 CR1343A Furlong Drive ------0 171 CR1500 Pintail Ct ------0- - 0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS (ALL COUNTY ROADS)
D l
a N i
r
A t
s
e
T u
d d L
S N d
a o
A n T s E Y r o I
M
n D o C
T r R M I o e O i o A s r P t L s n
e o P s M a i e j O A t i t O c i t T s a M R i L T c I l r i o I
C n r N s E E M / e a t L t V t t L a
T E
a s V c t s i o i h a t A e r N n C E M u r m I T F I D t t l T / e s t E D s e c A i C s t e d h M s N L c i a t C r i s s e Y e D a c E A O n p o y e c N c c w T p i o D I N i n c M * S m M i A v t t A I
s m r N A O t O N s I c a s H
s l e e Y n u a U C e e O M s u e v N I e S L T p i c B v E v e p t M R i E d T r I n E o A i t n o m a e i r I L d M a c F V T a v g s P p
d c r h U b O o e A N o O r e n A A m
S C I E P N N M T
U S E
Co. Rd. # / 30 15 5 33 10 5 -5 5 # Segment # Road Name
172 CR1359 Royal Avenue ------0- - 0 173 CR1373 Ruschman ------0- - 0 174 CR1382A South Sun Valley ------0- - 0 175 CR1106 Union Street 5------5- 0 176 CR1318 Weaver Lane -- 5-- ---5- 0 177 CR1013A Burger Road ------5--5 178 CR1130 Koehler Road ------5--5
179 CR1219 Morning View ------5--5 180 CR1105 Oregon Landing ------5--5 181 CR1021 Owl Creek ------5--5 182 CR1357 Steffen ------5--5 183 CR1354 Trapp Rd ------5--5 NEW CAMPBELL COUNTY STREET NAMES (Effective August 2003)
EXISTING NAME NEW NAME NOTES
3 MILE ROAD THREE MILE ROAD
AA (KY9) HIGHWAY AA HIGHWAY
AA (KY9) HIGHWAY AA HIGHWAY
AA (KY9) HIGHWAY AA HIGHWAY
ALEXANDRIA LICKING PIKE TOLLGATE ROAD
BEZOLD DECKER ROAD DECKER ROAD
BIRCH ROAD BIRCH DRIVE
CALIFORNIA CROSS ROAD CALIFORNIA CROSSROAD
CAMP SPRINGS LOOP GRESSKAMP ROAD
CARTHAGE ROAD NEW RICHMOND ROAD
DEAD END ROAD BLACK ROAD
DEAD TIMBER #1 DEAD TIMBER ROAD
DEAD TIMBER #2 WAGONER ROAD
DEAD TIMBER #2 offshoot NEWBERRY ROAD
FOUR AND TWELVE MILE ROAD STONEHOUSE ROAD
FOUR AND TWELVE MILE ROAD STONEHOUSE ROAD
FOUR AND TWELVE MILE ROAD STONEHOUSE ROAD
GUNKEL ROAD NO.1 GUNKEL ROAD
GUNKEL ROAD NO.1A RITTER LANE
GUNKEL ROAD NO.2 MYSTIC ROSE
GUNKEL ROAD NO.3 VINEYARD LANE
KY HIGHWAY 10 FLAGG SPRINGS PIKE S. of intersection @ Grandview & E. Main
KY HIGHWAY 10 MAIN STREET between Licking Pike & City of Alexandria
KY HIGHWAY 10 LICKING PIKE between Licking Pike & 536 EXISTING NAME NEW NAME NOTES
KY HIGHWAY 10 FLAGG SPRINGS PIKE S. of intersection @ Grandview & E. Main
KY HIGHWAY 154 PEACH GROVE ROAD
KY HIGHWAY 154 PEACH GROVE ROAD
KY HIGHWAY 1936 POND CREEK ROAD Pond Creek running North/South
KY HIGHWAY 536 CREEKTRACE ROAD formerly Pond Creek running West/East
KY HIGHWAY 8 MARY INGLES HIGHWAY
KY HIGHWAY 8 MARY INGLES HIGHWAY
KY HIGHWAY 8 MARY INGLES HIGHWAY
KY HIGHWAY 8 MARY INGLES HIGHWAY
LAKE VIEW ROAD/LANE PARKLAKE ROAD
LOWER 8 MILE ROAD EIGHT MILE ROAD
LOWER LICK BRANCH ROAD BRANCH LICK ROAD
MADDOX DRIVE MARTIN DRIVE
OAK STREET PINOAK STREET
OLD 4 MILE CONNECTOR RILEY ROAD west of intersection of AA Hwy & Four Mile
OLD CALIFORNIA CROSS ROAD SPUR ROAD
OLD GRANDVIEW ROAD GRANDVISTA ROAD
OLD KY 824 ROAD EAGLE VIEW
OLD KY 9 ROAD GOLF ROAD
OLD POPLAR THICKET BLUE SKY LANE
OLD STATE ROAD #3 FURLONG DRIVE north of 'current' Pond Creek (RTE 536)
OLD STATE ROAD #3 ECHO HILLS south of 'current' Pond Creek (RTE 536)
OLD STATE ROAD #3 CONNECTOR MIDWAY DRIVE
OLD STATE ROAD #4 WOESTE ROAD
OLD US 27 ROAD BOYD ROAD
PEACH GROVE GRANTS LICK ROAD PEACH GROVE ROAD EXISTING NAME NEW NAME NOTES
PEACH GROVE GRANTS LICK ROAD PEACH GROVE ROAD
PERSIMMON GROVE ROAD PERSIMMON GROVE PIKE
POOLES CREEK ROAD NO. 2 DRY CREEK ROAD
REIS ROAD REIS LANE
SCHMUDDE PHILLIPS CREEK ROAD PHILLIPS ROAD
SCHMUDDE TARVIN ROAD TARVIN ROAD
SHEANSHANG #1 SHEANSHANG ROAD
SHEANSHANG #2 PICNIC ROAD
SHORT TRUESDALE ROAD KOHLS ROAD
SUMMER HILL DRIVE SUNRISE ROAD
TRAPP MURNAN MURNAN ROAD
unnamed private drive KAPPES DRIVE off Lauren Lane, near 536
UPPER 8 MILE ROAD NINE MILE ROAD
W. LICKERT ROAD CAMEL CROSSING in front of Campbell County High School CAMPBELL COUNTY APPENDIX D
CONTENTS
COMPOSITE CAMPBELL COUNTY PROJECT TABLE
This Table identifies where roadway projects appear in various plans. COMPOSITE CAMPBELL COUNTY PROJECT TABLE
OKI TIP KY 6-Year Comp County Facility Location/Description Description OKI Plan OKI Needs KY-UNL ID Plan Plan Pave bike trail along KY-8 Campbell Bike Trail from Pendry Park to Silver X Grove Campbell I-275 AA Hwy to Ohio State Line add 2 lanes XX Major widening from US-27 Campbell I-471 to Ohio State Line X I-471SB Campbell from I-471 SB to I-275 WB add 1 lane ramp XX I-471SB redesign,1 additional Campbell SB off ramp at KY-8 ramp lane XX X Bikeway along Memorial Campbell KY-1120 Pkwy from Bellevue to Ft. X Thomas
Major widening of 3-Mile Rd. Campbell KY-2238 from KY-9 to I-275 overpass XX
Sidewalks along John's Hill Campbell KY-2345 Rd to I-275 adjacent to NKU X Reconstruct & add sidewalks Campbell KY-2345 from I-275 bridge to XX Sentinel Pt. John's Hill Rd. from Martha Campbell KY-2345 realign and widen Layne Collins Drive to I-275 XX X COMPOSITE CAMPBELL COUNTY PROJECT TABLE
OKI TIP KY 6-Year Comp. County Facility Location/Description Description OKI Plan OKI Needs KY-UNL ID Plan Plan
Poole's Creek Road No. 1 - Reconstruction, add Campbell KY-2938 US27 to AA Hwy climbing lane XX reconstruction with Campbell KY-536 KY-177 to Pond Creek new bridge XX new 2-lane Campbell KY-536 KY-9 to KY-8 connector XXX Extension of existing Campbell KY-536 US27 to KY9 roadway XX XX Reconstruction, add Campbell KY-547 AA Highway to KY10 climbing lane XX XX Reconstruct from AA Hwy to Campbell KY-547 Silver Grove XX
Spot improvement: correct S Campbell KY-547 curve at MP 0.35 X Reconstruct East Alexandria Campbell KY-709 Connector from US27 to AA X highway Riviera Dr. to Hallam Ave. add 1 lane and Campbell KY-8 (Bellevue) improve intersection XX
Stabilization and recon. from Campbell KY-8 Dayton to Pendleton c/l XX
Campbell KY-9 I-275 to US-27 add 2 lanes XX new 4-lane alignment along Campbell KY-9 11th St. to 4th St. Lowell and XX X connection to KY-8 rehab from KY-1632 to Campbell KY-9 bridge on RR near X Wilder/Newport c/l COMPOSITE CAMPBELL COUNTY PROJECT TABLE
OKI TIP KY 6-Year Comp. County Facility Location/Description Description OKI Plan OKI Needs KY-UNL ID Plan Plan
Reconstruct from bridge Campbell KY-9 over RR to 12th St. Newport X Additional signing and Campbell KY-9 lighting along AA Hwy X Reconstruct E. Alexandria Campbell Local Pike from US-27 to Cline X Middle School Bridge over Licking River N Campbell New of I-275 from KY-16/177 to X KY-9 Cross Co. Hwy from AA Hwy Campbell New to Ohio. Includes new Ohio X River bridge
Technology Triangle/NKU Campbell New Connector XXX
From Ky. 10 to Ky. 824, Campbell KY 1121 reconstruct/realign and X upgrade to collector From Ky. 1121 to US27 Campbell KY 824 recnstruct/realign and X upgrade to collector Enzweiler Terminate intersection with Campbell Rd. AA X COMPOSITE CAMPBELL COUNTY PROJECT TABLE
OKI TIP KY 6-Year Comp. County Facility Location/Description Description OKI Plan OKI Needs KY-UNL ID Plan Plan Bridge over Licking River to Campbell New connect AA Hwy & CSX Ind. X Site new road from 10th St. in Connector road Campbell New Newport to S. of Caruthers through Cote X Rd. Brilliant new NKU loop road from Campbell New Campbell Dr. to Pooles new 2-lane road X Creek #1 Campbell US-27 1.0 mile S of KY-10 to I-275 add 2 lanes XX reconstruct from I-471 to Campbell US-27 Taylor Southgate Bridge X reconstruct intersection at Campbell US-27 Overlook Dr. Ft. Thomas X Moock Rd. Campbell KY 1632 reconstruct/realign X XX Kenton I-275 I-75 to AA Hwy add 2 lanes 4th St. Bridge over Licking XX Kenton KY-8 River add 3 lanes 2-lane facility on Kenton KY-536 KY-16 to KY-177 new alignment XX CAMPBELL COUNTY APPENDIX E
CONTENTS
Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness, with Traffic Counts
Presented By: Ranking Alphabetically
Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 1. CR1304 East Alexandria Pike 27 41 5000 5 73 2. CR1330 Covert Run Pike 32 36 1552 2 70 3. CR1100 Barrs Branch 36 33 999 1 70 4. CR1301 Gilbert Ridge 41 25 499 0 66 5. CR1202 Lickert Road 30.7 33 2499 2 66 6. CR1224 Pleasant Ridge 30.5 33 1580 2 66 7. CR1103 California Crossroad 30 30 826 1 61 8. CR1027 Poplar Ridge 30 26 5000 5 61 9. CR1350 Murnan 30 28 1025 2 60 10. CR1257 Tarvin Road 34 23 999 1 58 11. CR1217 Clay Ridge 32.9 23 2499 2 58 12. CR1223 Wolf Rd 37 20 499 0 57 13. CR1222 Boone Smith Rd 35 20 999 1 56 14. CR1248 Parklake Road 36 20 499 0 56 15. CR1104 Washington Trace 33 23 499 0 56 16. CR1205 Craft Road 31 23 999 1 55 17. CR1316 Dodsworth Lane 34.5 18 1068 2 55 18. CR1121 Burns Road 33 20 999 1 54 19. CR1211 Nagel Road 35 18 999 1 54 20. CR1351 Tippenhaure Rd 34 20 499 0 54 21. CR1015 Nine Mile Road 30 23 999 1 54 22. CR1235 Visalia Rd 44 10 499 0 54 23. CR1010 Truesdell 33.5 20 499 0 54 24. CR1003 Grandview Road 34 18 723 1 53 25. CR1207D Old KY 9 34 18 999 1 53 26. CR1237A Madonna Ln 31 20 999 1 52 27. CR1002 Reiley Road 37 15 499 0 52 28. CR1017 Gunkel Road 40 10 499 1 51 29. CR1024 Upper Tug Fork 35 15 999 1 51 30. CR1115 Shaw Goetz Road 35.5 15 499 0 51 31. CR1102 Dead Timber Road 32 18 499 0 50 32. CR1131 Wish Road 40 10 499 0 50 33. CR1026 Reitman Road 34.5 15 499 0 50 34. CR1348 Bunning Lane 34 15 499 0 49 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 35 CR1022 Lower Tug Fork 41 8 416 0 49 36 CR1349 Dry Creek Road 36 13 499 0 49 37 CR1312 Uhl Road 28.75 18 1002 2 49 38 CR1317 Skyline Drive 28.7 20 499 0 49 39 CR1216 Hissem Rd 33.3 15 499 0 48 40 CR1228 Lees Rd 43 5 499 0 48 41 CR1033 Eight Mile Road 29 18 773 1 48 42 CR1030 Nelson Road (loop) 27 20 999 1 48 43 CR1113 Schababerle Hill 35 13 499 0 48 44 CR1206 Woeste Road 32.7 15 499 0 48 45 CR1325 Blangey Road 37 10 499 0 47 46 CR1120A Fisher Road 39 8 499 0 47 47 CR1236 Martin Road 32 15 499 0 47 48 CR1371 South Licking Pike 24.75 21 999 1 47 49 CR1360 Blossom Lane 29 15 2500 2 46 50 CR1374 Cabin Creek East 31 15 499 0 46 51 CR1125 Wagoner Road 36 10 499 0 46 52 CR1227 Harrisburg Hill Rd 41 5 499 0 46 53 CR1110 Kennedy Road 37 8 999 1 46 54 CR1247 Krift Road 36 10 499 0 46 55 CR1306A Low Gap West 32 13 999 1 46 56 CR1201 Moreland Road 36 10 499 0 46 57 CR1126 Shaw Hess Road 36 10 499 0 46 58 CR1012 Ten Mile Road 35.5 10 499 0 46 59 CR1246 Bob Huber Drive 30 15 499 0 45 60 CR1207 Golf Course Entrance 32 13 479 0 45 61 CR1209B Herringer Road 34 10 999 1 45 62 CR1200 Jerry Wright 30 15 499 0 45 63 CR1365 Maddox Drive 34 10 999 1 45 64 CR1028 Neltner Road 34 10 999 1 45 65 CR1308 Old State #1E 35 10 499 0 45 66 CR1311 Ripple Creek North 32 13 499 0 45 67 CR1368 Royal Oak 25 20 499 0 45 68 CR1127A Picnic Road 40 5 499 0 45 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 69 CR1025 Heck Road 34.5 10 499 0 45 70 CR1214 Aulick Road 39 5 499 0 44 71 CR1112 Daniels Road 36 8 499 0 44 72 CR1238A E Miller Rd 34 10 499 0 44 73 CR1212 Fairlane Rd. 34 10 499 0 44 74 CR1103A Gubser Mill 39 5 499 0 44 75 CR1017A Ritter Lane 39 5 499 0 44 76 CR1323 Holtz Drive 34 10 499 0 44 77 CR1239 Indian Trace 39 5 499 0 44 78 CR1118 Plum Creek Road 35 8 999 1 44 79 CR1232 Phillips Road 33 10 999 1 44 80 CR1004 Upper Lick Branch 34 10 499 0 44 81 CR1120 Bezold Road 35 8 499 0 43 82 CR1321 Gary Lane 38 5 499 0 43 83 CR1134 Haubner Road 38 5 499 0 43 84 CR1111 Ivor Road 29 13 999 1 43 85 CR1103B Spur Road 38 5 499 0 43 86 CR1207B Old KY 824 38 5 499 0 43 87 CR1208 Siry Road 32.5 8 1551 2 43 88 CR1133 Decker Road 37 5 499 0 42 89 CR1018 Dobbling Lane 37 5 499 0 42 90 CR1337 Eustace Avenue 32 10 499 0 42 91 CR1016 Mystic Rose 37 5 499 0 42 92 CR1005 Branch Lick Road 37 5 499 0 42 93 CR1009 Neises Road 37 5 499 0 42 94 CR1377 Rocky View Drive 32 10 499 0 42 95 CR1370 Williams Lane 29 13 499 0 42 96 CR1310 Ripple Creek 31.5 10 499 0 42 97 CR1114 Baynum Hill 36 5 499 0 41 98 CR1132 Bob White Lane 36 5 499 0 41 99 CR1129 Cryer Road 36 5 499 0 41 100 CR1023 Darlington Road 36 5 499 0 41 101 CR1033A Black Road 36 5 499 0 41 102 CR1123 Flatwoods Road 33 8 499 0 41 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 103 CR1013 Vineyard Lane 36 5 499 0 41 104 CR1234 Losey 35 5 999 1 41 105 CR1313 Messmer Hill 36 5 499 0 41 106 CR1116 Reis Ridge 36 5 499 0 41 107 CR1117 Reis Lane 36 5 499 0 41 108 CR1361 Scenic Drive 31 10 499 0 41 109 CR1127 Sheanshang Road 36 5 499 0 41 110 CR1238 W Miller Rd 36 5 499 0 41 111 CR1110A W. Kennedy 36 5 499 0 41 112 CR1124 Wagoner Road 36 5 499 0 41 113 CR1101 Lick Hill Road 32.5 8 499 0 41 114 CR1305 Backus Drive 29 10 999 1 40 115 CR1221 Bakersfield Rd 35 5 499 0 40 116 CR1336 Crowell Avenue 30 10 499 0 40 117 CR1214A Muinn Rd 35 5 499 0 40 118 CR1355 Rifle Range 35 5 499 0 40 119 CR1212A Short Fairlane 35 5 499 0 40 120 CR1372 Sunrise Road 30 10 499 0 40 121 CR1119 Yelton Hill 32 8 499 0 40 122 CR1252 Oak Lane 29.5 10 499 0 40 123 CR1215 Demossville Rd 34 5 499 0 39 124 CR1253 Henry Ct 29 10 499 0 39 125 CR1509 Kellie Lane 34 5 499 0 39 126 CR1014 Schalk Road 34 5 499 0 39 127 CR1029 Fausz Road 33.5 5 499 0 39 128 CR1230 Hillview Rd 28.5 10 499 0 39 129 CR1255 John Miller Rd 33 5 499 0 38 130 CR1003A Lower Grandview 33 5 499 0 38 131 CR1356 Poplar Thicket 33 5 499 0 38 132 CR1353 Murnan Road 33 5 499 0 38 133 CR1510 Darlas Drive 27 10 499 0 37 134 CR1209A Old US 27 32 5 499 0 37 135 CR1357 Steffen 42 -5 499 0 37 136 CR1243 Echo Hills 26.5 10 499 0 37 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 137 CR1375 Enzweiler Road 33 3 302 0 36 138 CR1218 Griffin Ford Rd 31 5 499 0 36 139 CR1011 Fender Road 35 0 396 0 35 140 CR1251 Milton Ln 30 5 499 0 35 141 CR1250 Morvue 30 5 499 0 35 142 CR1306B Low Gap East 34.5 0 499 0 35 143 CR1311B Blossom Drive 23 10 999 1 34 144 CR1501 Thelma Lee Drive 29 5 499 0 34 145 CR1318 Weaver Lane 34 0 499 0 34 146 CR1237E Cedar Ln 28 5 499 0 33 147 CR1367 Cutters Trace 33 0 499 0 33 148 CR1366 Lakewood Drive 33 0 499 0 33 149 CR1499 Marie Dr 28 5 499 0 33 150 CR1307 Old state #1W 28 5 499 0 33 151 CR1220 Smith Hiteman Rd 28 5 499 0 33 152 CR1106 Union Street 33 0 499 0 33 153 CR1013A Burger Road 37 -5 499 0 32 154 CR1219 Morning View 37 -5 499 0 32 155 CR1105 Oregon Landing 37 -5 499 0 32 156 CR1021 Owl Creek 37 -5 499 0 32 157 CR1502 Williams Ridge 27 5 499 0 32 158 CR1032A Gresskamp Road 29 0 499 1 30 159 CR1369 Joann Ln 25 5 499 0 30 160 CR1379 Labrador Ln 25 5 499 0 30 161 CR1207A Parkside Drive 24 5 999 1 30 162 CR1359 Royal Avenue 30 0 499 0 30 163 CR1354 Trapp Rd 35 -5 499 0 30 164 CR1258 Schweitzer Ct 23 5 499 0 28 165 CR1512 Awesome Place 27 0 499 0 27 166 CR1130 Koehler Road 32 -5 499 0 27 167 CR1230A Crestview 21 5 499 0 26 168 CR1383 Deer Run 21 5 499 0 26 169 CR1506 Doubletree Lane 21 5 499 0 26 170 CR1343A Furlong Drive 26 0 499 0 26 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (By Ranking)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 171 CR1381 Stoneybrook Court 21 5 499 0 26 172 CR1508 Sugar Mill Drive 21 5 499 0 26 173 CR1505 West Hickory 21 5 499 0 26 174 CR1504 East Hickory Court 25 0 499 0 25 175 CR1382A South Sun Valley 25 0 499 0 25 176 CR1380 Lauren Ln 23 0 499 0 23 177 CR1378 Mallard Dr 22 0 499 0 22 178 CR1500 Pintail Ct 22 0 499 0 22 179 CR1503 Cedar Trail 21 0 499 0 21 180 CR1507 Magnolia 21 0 499 0 21 181 CR1382 North Sun Valley 21 0 499 0 21 182 CR1376 Marl-Rich 20 0 499 0 20 183 CR1373 Ruschman 20 0 499 0 20 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 1. CR1214 Aulick Road 39 5 499 0 44 2. CR1512 Awesome Place 27 0 499 0 27 3. CR1305 Backus Drive 29 10 999 1 40 4. CR1221 Bakersfield Rd 35 5 499 0 40 5. CR1100 Barrs Branch 36 33 999 1 70 6. CR1114 Baynum Hill 36 5 499 0 41 7. CR1120 Bezold Road 35 8 499 0 43 8. CR1033A Black Road 36 5 499 0 41 9. CR1325 Blangey Road 37 10 499 0 47 10. CR1311B Blossom Drive 23 10 999 1 34 11. CR1360 Blossom Lane 29 15 2500 2 46 12. CR1246 Bob Huber Drive 30 15 499 0 45 13. CR1132 Bob White Lane 36 5 499 0 41 14. CR1222 Boone Smith Rd 35 20 999 1 56 15. CR1005 Branch Lick Road 37 5 499 0 42 16. CR1348 Bunning Lane 34 15 499 0 49 17. CR1013A Burger Road 37 -5 499 0 32 18. CR1121 Burns Road 33 20 999 1 54 19. CR1374 Cabin Creek East 31 15 499 0 46 20. CR1103 California Crossroad 30 30 826 1 61 21. CR1237E Cedar Ln 28 5 499 0 33 22. CR1503 Cedar Trail 21 0 499 0 21 23. CR1217 Clay Ridge 32.9 23 2499 2 58 24. CR1330 Covert Run Pike 32 36 1552 2 70 25. CR1205 Craft Road 31 23 999 1 55 26. CR1230A Crestview 21 5 499 0 26 27. CR1336 Crowell Avenue 30 10 499 0 40 28. CR1129 Cryer Road 36 5 499 0 41 29. CR1367 Cutters Trace 33 0 499 0 33 30. CR1112 Daniels Road 36 8 499 0 44 31. CR1510 Darlas Drive 27 10 499 0 37 32. CR1023 Darlington Road 36 5 499 0 41 33. CR1102 Dead Timber Road 32 18 499 0 50 34. CR1133 Decker Road 37 5 499 0 42 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 35 CR1383 Deer Run 21 5 499 0 26 36 CR1215 Demossville Rd 34 5 499 0 39 37 CR1018 Dobbling Lane 37 5 499 0 42 38 CR1316 Dodsworth Lane 34.5 18 1068 2 55 39 CR1506 Doubletree Lane 21 5 499 0 26 40 CR1349 Dry Creek Road 36 13 499 0 49 41 CR1238A E Miller Rd 34 10 499 0 44 42 CR1304 East Alexandria Pike 27 41 5000 5 73 43 CR1504 East Hickory Court 25 0 499 0 25 44 CR1243 Echo Hills 26.5 10 499 0 37 45 CR1033 Eight Mile Road 29 18 773 1 48 46 CR1375 Enzweiler Road 33 3 302 0 36 47 CR1337 Eustace Avenue 32 10 499 0 42 48 CR1212 Fairlane Rd. 34 10 499 0 44 49 CR1029 Fausz Road 33.5 5 499 0 39 50 CR1011 Fender Road 35 0 396 0 35 51 CR1120A Fisher Road 39 8 499 0 47 52 CR1123 Flatwoods Road 33 8 499 0 41 53 CR1343A Furlong Drive 26 0 499 0 26 54 CR1321 Gary Lane 38 5 499 0 43 55 CR1301 Gilbert Ridge 41 25 499 0 66 56 CR1207 Golf Course Entrance 32 13 479 0 45 57 CR1003 Grandview Road 34 18 723 1 53 58 CR1032A Gresskamp Road 29 0 499 1 30 59 CR1218 Griffin Ford Rd 31 5 499 0 36 60 CR1103A Gubser Mill 39 5 499 0 44 61 CR1017 Gunkel Road 40 10 499 1 51 62 CR1227 Harrisburg Hill Rd 41 5 499 0 46 63 CR1134 Haubner Road 38 5 499 0 43 64 CR1025 Heck Road 34.5 10 499 0 45 65 CR1253 Henry Ct 29 10 499 0 39 66 CR1209B Herringer Road 34 10 999 1 45 67 CR1230 Hillview Rd 28.5 10 499 0 39 68 CR1216 Hissem Rd 33.3 15 499 0 48 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 69 CR1323 Holtz Drive 34 10 499 0 44 70 CR1239 Indian Trace 39 5 499 0 44 71 CR1111 Ivor Road 29 13 999 1 43 72 CR1200 Jerry Wright 30 15 499 0 45 73 CR1369 Joann Ln 25 5 499 0 30 74 CR1255 John Miller Rd 33 5 499 0 38 75 CR1509 Kellie Lane 34 5 499 0 39 76 CR1110 Kennedy Road 37 8 999 1 46 77 CR1130 Koehler Road 32 -5 499 0 27 78 CR1247 Krift Road 36 10 499 0 46 79 CR1379 Labrador Ln 25 5 499 0 30 80 CR1366 Lakewood Drive 33 0 499 0 33 81 CR1380 Lauren Ln 23 0 499 0 23 82 CR1228 Lees Rd 43 5 499 0 48 83 CR1101 Lick Hill Road 32.5 8 499 0 41 84 CR1202 Lickert Road 30.7 33 2499 2 66 85 CR1234 Losey 35 5 999 1 41 86 CR1306B Low Gap East 34.5 0 499 0 35 87 CR1306A Low Gap West 32 13 999 1 46 88 CR1003A Lower Grandview 33 5 499 0 38 89 CR1022 Lower Tug Fork 41 8 416 0 49 90 CR1365 Maddox Drive 34 10 999 1 45 91 CR1237A Madonna Ln 31 20 999 1 52 92 CR1507 Magnolia 21 0 499 0 21 93 CR1378 Mallard Dr 22 0 499 0 22 94 CR1499 Marie Dr 28 5 499 0 33 95 CR1376 Marl-Rich 20 0 499 0 20 96 CR1236 Martin Road 32 15 499 0 47 97 CR1313 Messmer Hill 36 5 499 0 41 98 CR1251 Milton Ln 30 5 499 0 35 99 CR1201 Moreland Road 36 10 499 0 46 100 CR1219 Morning View 37 -5 499 0 32 101 CR1250 Morvue 30 5 499 0 35 102 CR1214A Muinn Rd 35 5 499 0 40 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 103 CR1350 Murnan 30 28 1025 2 60 104 CR1353 Murnan Road 33 5 499 0 38 105 CR1016 Mystic Rose 37 5 499 0 42 106 CR1211 Nagel Road 35 18 999 1 54 107 CR1009 Neises Road 37 5 499 0 42 108 CR1030 Nelson Road (loop) 27 20 999 1 48 109 CR1028 Neltner Road 34 10 999 1 45 110 CR1015 Nine Mile Road 30 23 999 1 54 111 CR1382 North Sun Valley 21 0 499 0 21 112 CR1252 Oak Lane 29.5 10 499 0 40 113 CR1207B Old KY 824 38 5 499 0 43 114 CR1207D Old KY 9 34 18 999 1 53 115 CR1308 Old State #1E 35 10 499 0 45 116 CR1307 Old State #1W 28 5 499 0 33 117 CR1209A Old US 27 32 5 499 0 37 118 CR1105 Oregon Landing 37 -5 499 0 32 119 CR1021 Owl Creek 37 -5 499 0 32 120 CR1248 Parklake Road 36 20 499 0 56 121 CR1207A Parkside Drive 24 5 999 1 30 122 CR1232 Phillips Road 33 10 999 1 44 123 CR1127A Picnic Road 40 5 499 0 45 124 CR1500 Pintail Ct 22 0 499 0 22 125 CR1224 Pleasant Ridge 30.5 33 1580 2 66 126 CR1118 Plum Creek Road 35 8 999 1 44 127 CR1027 Poplar Ridge 30 26 5000 5 61 128 CR1356 Poplar Thicket 33 5 499 0 38 129 CR1002 Reiley Road 37 15 499 0 52 130 CR1117 Reis Lane 36 5 499 0 41 131 CR1116 Reis Ridge 36 5 499 0 41 132 CR1026 Reitman Road 34.5 15 499 0 50 133 CR1355 Rifle Range 35 5 499 0 40 134 CR1310 Ripple Creek 31.5 10 499 0 42 135 CR1311 Ripple Creek North 32 13 499 0 45 136 CR1017A Ritter Lane 39 5 499 0 44 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 137 CR1377 Rocky View Drive 32 10 499 0 42 138 CR1359 Royal Avenue 30 0 499 0 30 139 CR1368 Royal Oak 25 20 499 0 45 140 CR1373 Ruschman 20 0 499 0 20 141 CR1361 Scenic Drive 31 10 499 0 41 142 CR1113 Schababerle Hill 35 13 499 0 48 143 CR1014 Schalk Road 34 5 499 0 39 144 CR1258 Schweitzer Ct 23 5 499 0 28 145 CR1115 Shaw Goetz Road 35.5 15 499 0 51 146 CR1126 Shaw Hess Road 36 10 499 0 46 147 CR1127 Sheanshang Road 36 5 499 0 41 148 CR1212A Short Fairlane 35 5 499 0 40 149 CR1208 Siry Road 32.5 8 1551 2 43 150 CR1317 Skyline Drive 28.7 20 499 0 49 151 CR1220 Smith Hiteman Rd 28 5 499 0 33 152 CR1371 South Licking Pike 24.75 21 999 1 47 153 CR1382A South Sun Valley 25 0 499 0 25 154 CR1103B Spur Road 38 5 499 0 43 155 CR1357 Steffen 42 -5 499 0 37 156 CR1381 Stoneybrook Court 21 5 499 0 26 157 CR1508 Sugar Mill Drive 21 5 499 0 26 158 CR1372 Sunrise Road 30 10 499 0 40 159 CR1257 Tarvin Road 34 23 999 1 58 160 CR1012 Ten Mile Road 35.5 10 499 0 46 161 CR1501 Thelma Lee Drive 29 5 499 0 34 162 CR1351 Tippenhaure Rd 34 20 499 0 54 163 CR1354 Trapp Rd 35 -5 499 0 30 164 CR1010 Truesdell 33.5 20 499 0 54 165 CR1312 Uhl Road 28.75 18 1002 2 49 166 CR1106 Union Street 33 0 499 0 33 167 CR1004 Upper Lick Branch 34 10 499 0 44 168 CR1024 Upper Tug Fork 35 15 999 1 51 169 CR1013 Vineyard Lane 36 5 499 0 41 170 CR1235 Visalia Rd 44 10 499 0 54 Roadway Characteristics and Effectiveness with Traffic Counts (Alphabetically)
s
c l i
t a
t s
i
o r
T e
t
s c
s a
r e
a n
h e
v C i
t
l y c
a a e t f
f w o
d E T
t a f e
n r o o
u o
R s o c
l e
C S r a
L
c u c c i i i A s f f s
f f a T y
a a e h r r O
P M T T T
Co. Rd. # / # Segment # Road Name 171 CR1238 W Miller Rd 36 5 499 0 41 172 CR1110A W. Kennedy 36 5 499 0 41 173 CR1125 Wagoner Road 36 10 499 0 46 174 CR1124 Wagoner Road 36 5 499 0 41 175 CR1104 Washington Trace 33 23 499 0 56 176 CR1318 Weaver Lane 34 0 499 0 34 177 CR1505 West Hickory 21 5 499 0 26 178 CR1370 Williams Lane 29 13 499 0 42 179 CR1502 Williams Ridge 27 5 499 0 32 180 CR1131 Wish Road 40 10 499 0 50 181 CR1206 Woeste Road 32.7 15 499 0 48 182 CR1223 Wolf Rd 37 20 499 0 57 183 CR1119 Yelton Hill 32 8 499 0 40