DOCSLIB.ORG

Freshwater Fish Biodiversity and Conservation Louis A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freshwater Fish Biodiversity and Conservation Louis A PUBLICATION 420-525 Sustaining America’s Aquatic Biodiversity Freshwater Fish Biodiversity and Conservation Louis A. Helfrich, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Tech Richard J. Neves, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Tech early 800 native fish species in 36 families Unfortunately, nongame fishes have declined sharply inhabit the freshwater rivers, streams, and in abundance and diversity in the last 20 years. Twen- lakes of the United States and Canada. North ty-seven species of fishes have become extinct during NAmerica has the most diverse temperate freshwater the past century. At least 16 species of fish have be- fish fauna in the world. Only about 5 percent of these come extinct in the United States since 1964. Nearly are the familiar sport or game fishes like trout and all of the fishes in the Colorado River are endangered bass. The remaining 95 percent are little known, but or threatened. Of the 490 Southeastern freshwater colorful, nongame (not sport fish) fishes such as dart- fishes, 91 are in trouble. At present, nearly 20 percent ers, minnows, shiners, and dace. of the native freshwater fishes in North America are imperiled, meaning that they are endangered, threat- About one-third of North American fishes are in the ened, or of special concern. minnow family (Cyprinidae), and about one-fifth are in the darter and perch family (Percidae). The East- What Is a Fish? ern United States has nearly four times as many fish species as the western states, yet the Southwestern Fish are cold-blooded animals with a backbone (ver- deserts have a remarkable fish fauna. The Southeast- tebrates), gills for breathing underwater, and paired ern United States harbors the greatest diversity of fins for swimming. They live underwater and are fish, with over 600 native fishes. States with the rich- dependent on water for dissolved oxygen, support, est diversity of fish include Tennessee (307 species), food, and shelter. Marine mammals (whales, dol- Kentucky (242 species), and Virginia (217 species). phins, seals, sea otters), reptiles (turtles), amphibians (frogs and salamanders), shellfish (oysters, clams, and Nongame fishes, although not pursued by anglers, are mussels), and aquatic invertebrates (crayfish, starfish, nevertheless important. They serve us in many ways lobster) are not fish. Although they may not look like and deserve our protection. Nongame fishes are an fish, seahorses and eels actually are fish. important ecological link in the food chain, feeding on insects and serving as prey for sport fishes, birds, The three main groups of fish are and other wildlife. They also are important indicators • jawless fish (lampreys), of water quality and ecosystem health. For example, a • cartilaginous fishes (sharks and rays), and fish kill or the disappearance of fishes from a stream • bony fishes (most fish species). can alert citizens to water pollution. www.ext.vt.edu Produced by Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009 Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Rick D. Rudd, Interim Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Alma C. Hobbs, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg. The first two groups are primitive, ancient fishes, where- How do fishes breathe? All animals need oxygen to as the bony fishes are more recent, advanced fishes. survive. Land animals breathe atmospheric air that contains 21 percent oxygen. However, oxygen is not Fish exhibit the greatest biodiversity of the vertebrates always available in water. Dissolved oxygen levels in (animals with backbones) with over 22,000 species. water can range from 0 percent to over 100 percent Of these, about 58 percent are marine, 41 percent are saturation, depending on water temperature, eleva- freshwater species, and 1 percent move back and forth tion, air pressure, other dissolved gases, and water between salt- and freshwater. As expected, marine quality. fishes are the most diverse because saltwater covers 70 percent of the earth. Only 1 percent of the earth is Fish extract dissolved oxygen from the water using covered by freshwater. their gills. In breathing, This small area is home to Dorsal Fin fish first gulp a mouthful 8,000 species of freshwater of water, then close their fishes. Gil Plate Adipose Fin mouths, and pressurize Eye Caudal Fin the water, forcing it over Anglers prefer sport fish Jaws the rich red blood supply (trout, bass, and pike) Lateral Line of gills and out the oper- for their fighting or food cula (gill-flaps). Oxygen value. In contrast, non- is absorbed directly into Anal Fin game fish are not com- Barbels Throat the fish’s blood supply Pelvic Fin monly sought by anglers Pectoral Fin and distributed through- because they are small fish out the body via the (minnows, darters, and Figure 1. External featues of a Composite fish circulatory system. dace) or not particularly good eating (carp, goldfish, bullheads, lamprey, and Some fishes have an internal, inflatable air (swim) gar). Ninety-five percent of fish are nongame fish. For bladder that evolved as an outgrowth of the intestine. example, of the 217 species of fish found in Virginia, The air bladder can be inflated or deflated to regulate only 25 are considered game fish. buoyancy and depth. Some fish use their air bladders to amplify underwater sound, and thereby increase their The science and study of fish is called ichthyology ability to hear. Gar and lungfishes use their air blad- (from the Greek word for fish, ichthyes). Fish have ders to gulp and breathe atmospheric oxygen. They can been raised and studied for centuries, beginning with survive in low-oxygen water for long periods. the early Chinese, Egyptians, and Greeks. The farming of fish and other aquatic animals is called aquaculture. Nearly all fish have a protective slimy mucus cover- ing their skin. This outer coating reduces friction and Structure and appearance increases swimming speed. It also protects fish from parasites and diseases, and permits salt balance (os- Fish exhibit a variety of body forms. Some are moregulation). Removing the mucus layer by netting streamlined, torpedo-shaped (trout, sharks, and sail- and handling fish can increase their susceptibility to fish), allowing them to slip easily through the water. disease and disrupt their salt balance. Others are flattened top to bottom (flatfish and rays) for living on the bottom and making surprise attacks Many fish are armored with transparent plates called on prey. Some fish are flattened laterally (sunfishes) scales that overlap like roof shingles. Some fish have so they can make quick turns. Long, thin, needle- no scales. Others have scales that reflect silvery light shaped fish (gar and pike) are designed for high to confuse predators. Scales are used to identify fish forward speed to catch prey. Pipefish and angelfish species and to age fish. By counting the number of mimic the leaves of waterweeds for camouflage. scales along the lateral line (mid-body hearing organ), Fish vary in size more than any other group of ver- ichthyologists can accurately identify each fish spe- tebrates. The world’s biggest fish is the whale shark cies. Under the microscope, growth rings on scales which reaches 50 feet in length and weighs over 20 can be counted like tree rings to determine the age of tons. The smallest fish is the pygmy goby, which a fish. reaches only 0.3 inch in length. 2 Fish use their fins to stop, start, steer, turn, swim Salmon, American eels, and a few other fish can backward and forward, chase and catch food, and migrate between fresh- and saltwater. Salmon are migrate. The large, powerful tail (caudal) fin is impor- anadromous fish that are born in freshwater, migrate tant for forward speed. All fins, including the dorsal to and live in the ocean, and then return to freshwater (top), pectoral (chest), and pelvic (abdominal) fins, (often their birth stream) to reproduce (spawn) and are used in swimming and maneuvering. The dorsal, die. Eels are catadromous fish. They are born in the caudal, and anal fins are median, unpaired fins. The ocean and migrate to freshwater to live, only return- pelvic and pectoral fins are paired. ing to the ocean to spawn. Fin shape and location are important for swimming The rich diversity of fish (25,000 species) is due to and maneuvering. Fast swimming fish (tuna and the diversity of aquatic habitats and the range of wa- swordfish) have long pointed and crescent-shaped fins ter quality in which they can live. It also results from that fold into body slots to reduce drag. Flying fish immense isolation in time and space (fish evolved have long, broad wing-shaped fins that allow them to over millions of years in oceans worldwide). jump and glide long distances above the surface. Puffer and box fish have small, rapidly-beat- Fish diversity is greater in streams than in lakes. ing fins for fine maneuvering. Frequently two to ten species of fish can be found in small streams, 15 to 30 species in an intermediate- Fins contain supporting sized stream, and 20 fin rays that can be soft, to 40 fish species in a hard, or a combination of river. An exceptional both. Hard, sharp fins can diversity of fishes is deliver a painful (even found in the South- toxic) jab when erected eastern United States, (some catfish). Pectoral where as many as 90 fins can be large and species of fish may live broad as in flying fishes in a single river.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Diversity of Fish (Pisces) in Freshwater
    Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:545–567 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9034-0 FRESHWATER ANIMAL DIVERSITY ASSESSMENT Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater C. Le´veˆque Æ T. Oberdorff Æ D. Paugy Æ M. L. J. Stiassny Æ P. A. Tedesco Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The precise number of extant fish spe- species live in lakes and rivers that cover only 1% cies remains to be determined. About 28,900 species of the earth’s surface, while the remaining 16,000 were listed in FishBase in 2005, but some experts species live in salt water covering a full 70%. While feel that the final total may be considerably higher. freshwater species belong to some 170 families (or Freshwater fishes comprise until now almost 13,000 207 if peripheral species are also considered), the species (and 2,513 genera) (including only fresh- bulk of species occur in a relatively few groups: water and strictly peripheral species), or about the Characiformes, Cypriniformes, Siluriformes, 15,000 if all species occurring from fresh to and Gymnotiformes, the Perciformes (noteably the brackishwaters are included. Noteworthy is the fact family Cichlidae), and the Cyprinodontiformes. that the estimated 13,000 strictly freshwater fish Biogeographically the distribution of strictly fresh- water species and genera are, respectively 4,035 species (705 genera) in the Neotropical region, 2,938 (390 genera) in the Afrotropical, 2,345 (440 Guest editors: E. V. Balian, C. Le´veˆque, H. Segers & K. Martens genera) in the Oriental, 1,844 (380 genera) in the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment Palaearctic, 1,411 (298 genera) in the Nearctic, and 261 (94 genera) in the Australian.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Evolutionary Dynamics of the OR Gene Repertoire in Teleost Fishes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Article Evolutionary dynamics of the OR gene repertoire in teleost fishes: evidence of an association with changes in olfactory epithelium shape Maxime Policarpo1, Katherine E Bemis2, James C Tyler3, Cushla J Metcalfe4, Patrick Laurenti5, Jean-Christophe Sandoz1, Sylvie Rétaux6 and Didier Casane*,1,7 1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 2 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, U.S.A. 4 Independent Researcher, PO Box 21, Nambour QLD 4560, Australia. 5 Université de Paris, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Energies de Demain, Paris, France 6 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur- Yvette, France. 7 Université de Paris, UFR Sciences du Vivant, F-75013 Paris, France. * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]. !1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434524; this version posted March 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Teleost fishes perceive their environment through a range of sensory modalities, among which olfaction often plays an important role.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity Author(s): Nathaniel P. Hitt, Lisa K. Bonneau, Kunjuraman V. Jayachandran, and Michael P. Marchetti Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 5, pp. 5-16 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2015, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ SYNTHESIS 5 Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity Nathaniel P. Hitt1, Lisa K. Bonneau2, Kunjuraman V. Jayachandran3, and Michael P. Marchetti4 1U.S. Geological Survey, Leetown Science Center, USA, 2Metropolitan Community College-Blue River, USA, 3Kerala Agricultural University, India, 4School of Science, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Crappie and Crappie Fishing
    Crappie & Crappie Fishing Crappie are among the most popular sport fishes in Texas. They are known by various names including white perch, sac-a-lait, calico bass, and paper-mouth. Two species are found in Texas, the white crappie (Pomoxis annularis) and black crappie (P. nigromaculatus). Black crap­ pie have irregular dark speck­ les and blotches on their sides. On white crappie, the dark markings consist of regularly arranged vertical bars. When in doubt, count the number of sharp dorsal spines at the front of a crappie’s dorsal fin. Black crappie have seven or eight spines while white crappie Young crappie feed on microscopic crustaceans called have five or six. During the spawning season, males of zooplankton. Juveniles and adults feed primarily on both species develop dark markings over most of the small threadfin and gizzard shad and insect larvae, es­ body, causing many anglers to misidentify male white pecially mayflies. Their diet also includes minnows, crappie as black crappie. silversides, other crappie and any other fish small enough to swallow. Black crappie are more numerous in the clear, acidic to slightly alkaline waters of East Texas. White crappie are found state­ In lakes with low bass populations, crappie often wide. Fish of both species may live up to eight years and overpopulate and become stunted. For crappie to reach become sexually mature at one to two years. Crappie belong larger sizes, populations must experience high total mor­ to the same family as the sunfishes and black basses; like tality to keep their numbers within the carrying capacity their cousins, crappie are nest builders.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Spawning Aggregations
    Fish Spawning Aggregations a focal point of fisheries management and marine conservation in Mexico Photo: Octavio Aburto Authorship Brad Erisman – Coastal Fisheries Research Program, University of Texas Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373 William Heyman – LGL Ecological Research Associates, Inc., 4103 S. Texas Avenue, Bryan TX 77802 Stuart Fulton – Comunidad y Biodiversidad, Isla del Peruano 215, Lomas de Miramar, Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico Timothy Rowell – Gulf of California Marine Program, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037 Illustrations – Larry Allen and Madeline Wukusick Graphic Design – Madeline Wukusick | www.communique.design Photography – Octavio Aburto, Richard Barnden, Douglas David Seifert, Walt Stearns, Cristina Limonta, Alfredo Barroso Citation – Erisman, B., W.D. Heyman, S. Fulton, and T.Rowell 2018. Fish spawning aggregations: a focal point of fisheries management and marine conservation in Mexico. Gulf of California Marine Program, La Jolla, CA. 24 p. Email Contact: Brad Erisman, [email protected] Fish Spawning Aggregations // 2 Contents > Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 > What are fish spawning aggregations (FSAs)? ............................................................................................................ 5 > What kinds of fishes form FSAs? ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK (1958) 37, 7°5-752
    J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. (1958) 37, 7°5-752 Printed in Great Britain OBSERVATIONS ON LUMINESCENCE IN PELAGIC ANIMALS By J. A. C. NICOL The Plymouth Laboratory (Plate I and Text-figs. 1-19) Luminescence is very common among marine animals, and many species possess highly developed photophores or light-emitting organs. It is probable, therefore, that luminescence plays an important part in the economy of their lives. A few determinations of the spectral composition and intensity of light emitted by marine animals are available (Coblentz & Hughes, 1926; Eymers & van Schouwenburg, 1937; Clarke & Backus, 1956; Kampa & Boden, 1957; Nicol, 1957b, c, 1958a, b). More data of this kind are desirable in order to estimate the visual efficiency of luminescence, distances at which luminescence can be perceived, the contribution it makes to general back• ground illumination, etc. With such information it should be possible to discuss. more profitably such biological problems as the role of luminescence in intraspecific signalling, sex recognition, swarming, and attraction or re• pulsion between species. As a contribution to this field I have measured the intensities of light emitted by some pelagic species of animals. Most of the work to be described in this paper was carried out during cruises of R. V. 'Sarsia' and RRS. 'Discovery II' (Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom and National Institute of Oceanography, respectively). Collections were made at various stations in the East Atlantic between 30° N. and 48° N. The apparatus for measuring light intensities was calibrated ashore at the Plymouth Laboratory; measurements of animal light were made at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Longitudinal Distribution of Freshwater Fish in Klawing River, Central Java, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 19, Number 1, January 2018 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 85-92 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190114 Diversity and longitudinal distribution of freshwater fish in Klawing River, Central Java, Indonesia SUHESTRI SURYANINGSIH♥, SRI SUKMANINGRUM, SORTA BASAR IDA SIMANJUNTAK, KUSBIYANTO Faculty of Biology, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. Jl. Dr. Soeparno No. 63, Purwokerto-Banyumas 53122, Central Java, Indonesia. Tel.: +62-281- 638794, Fax.: +62-281-631700, ♥email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 10 July 2017. Revision accepted: 2 December 2017. Abstract. Suryaningsih S, Sukmaningrum S, Simanjuntak SBI, Kusbiyanto. 2018. Diversity and longitudinal distribution of freshwater fish in Klawing River, Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19: 85-92. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diversity and longitudinal distribution of fish in Klawing River, Purbalingga (Central Java). The survey was performed using a clustered random- sampling technique. The river was divided into upstream, midstream and downstream regions. Species diversity was measured as the number of species, and the longitudinal distribution was assessed by determining the fish species present in each of the three regions. Eighteen fish species of eleven families were identified in the Klawing River: Cyprinidae, Bagridae, Mastacembelidae, Anabantidae, Cichlidae, Channidae, Eleotrididae, Beleontinidae, Osphronemidae, Poecilidae, and Siluridae. Cyprinidae exhibited the highest number of species (six), followed by Bagridae and Cichlidae (two species each). The other families were represented by one species each. A single cluster analysis showed that the upstream population had a similarity of 78% and 50% with the midstream and downstream populations, respectively. Species and family diversities were higher in the midstream populations than in the upstream and downstream populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Scotian Shelf Ichthyoplankton Program
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR (S) International Commission for a the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Serial No. 5179 ICNAF Res. Doc. 78/VI/21 (D.c.1) ANNUAl MEETING - JUNE 1978 Report on the First Scotian Shelf Ichthyoplanktoll Program (SSIP) Workshop, 29 August to 3 September 1977, St. Andrews, N. B. Sponsored by Department of Fisheries and Environment Marine Fish Division Resource Branch, Maritimes Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth, Nova Scotia TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 2 Terms of Reference 2 Introduction 4 Oceanographic Regime •••••..••••.•.•.•••••••..••••••.••..•. 4 Overview of Present Approaches ••••••••••••••••••..•••.•••• 6 - Canada 6 - United States of America 13 - Un! ted Kingdom 19 - Federal Republic of Germany......................... 24 Sampling Recommendations 25 Sorting Protocols 26 Planning Sessions 26 Summary and Resolutions ••••••••.•..••...•••.••••...•.•.•.• 27 References 28 List of participants 30 Convener P. F. Lett Rapporteur: J. F. Schweigert C2 - 2 - ABSTRACT The Scotian Shelf ichthyoplankton workshop was organized to draw on expertise from other prevailing programs and to incorporate any new ideas on ichthyoplankton ecology and sampling 8S it might relate to the stock-recruitment problem and fisheries management. Experts from a number of leading fisheries laboratories presented overviews of their ichthyoplankton programs and approaches to fisheries management. The importance of understanding the eJirly life history of most fish species was emphasized and some pre! iminary reBul
    [Show full text]
  • Snakeheadsnepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN a Biologicalmyanmar Synopsis Vietnam
    Mongolia North Korea Afghan- China South Japan istan Korea Iran SnakeheadsNepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN A BiologicalMyanmar Synopsis Vietnam and Risk Assessment Philippines Thailand Malaysia INDIAN OCEAN Indonesia Indonesia U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 SNAKEHEADS (Pisces, Channidae)— A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment By Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Copyrighted material reprinted with permission. 2004 For additional information write to: Walter R. Courtenay, Jr. Florida Integrated Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 For additional copies please contact: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae)—A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment / by Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams p. cm. — (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1251) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN.0-607-93720 (alk. paper) 1. Snakeheads — Pisces, Channidae— Invasive Species 2. Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment. Title. II. Series. QL653.N8D64 2004 597.8’09768’89—dc22 CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Literature Review and Background Information . 4 Taxonomy and Synonymy .
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Ecology of Marine Forage Fishes— Proceedings of a Research Symposium, September 2012
    Conservation and Ecology of Marine Forage Fishes— Proceedings of a Research Symposium, September 2012 Open-File Report 2013–1035 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Upper Left: Herring spawn, BC coast – Milton Love, “Certainly More Than You Want to Know About the Fishes of the Pacific Coast,” reproduced with permission. Left Center: Tufted Puffin and sand lance (Smith Island, Puget Sound) – Joseph Gaydos, SeaDoc Society. Right Center: Symposium attendants – Tami Pokorny, Jefferson County Water Resources. Upper Right: Buried sand lance – Milton Love, “Certainly More Than You Want to Know About the Fishes of the Pacific Coast,” reproduced with permission. Background: Pacific sardine, CA coast – Milton Love, “Certainly More Than You Want to Know About the Fishes of the Pacific Coast,” reproduced with permission. Conservation and Ecology of Marine Forage Fishes— Proceedings of a Research Symposium, September 2012 Edited by Theresa Liedtke, U.S. Geological Survey; Caroline Gibson, Northwest Straits Commission; Dayv Lowry, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Duane Fagergren, Puget Sound Partnership Open-File Report 2013–1035 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Liedtke, Theresa, Gibson, Caroline, Lowry, Dayv, and Fagergren, Duane, eds., 2013, Conservation and Ecology of Marine Forage Fishes—Proceedings of a Research Symposium, September 2012: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]