https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society rshpesadlcss(3%,tu us(1%,and %), (11 bugs true dragon %), crickets, %), (13 %), termites, (31 (15 locusts ants beetles and and eaten: bees grasshoppers are wasps, %), groups (18 insect caterpillars all almost from h uhr21 is ulse nie2 eray2016 February 24 online published First 2016 Author The © vial:Africa available: Australia DeFoliart r osmdb ua subjects human by consumed are orsodn author Corresponding Abbreviations: Bodenheimer by reviewed extensively countries subtropical been and tropical has in insects of eating The Society Nutrition the of Proceedings sepce oices lblyb 6%fo 2005/ from % 76 by globally protein increase animal for to demand expected the consid- However, is never food. were as insects ered recently until world, Western https://www.cambridge.org/core ofrneon Conference ( 8 ( h urto oit umrMeig21 eda nvriyo otnhm otnhmo 6 on Nottingham Nottingham, of University at held 2015 Meeting Summer Society Nutrition The noooy aeignUiest,Dovnalete ,aeign 78B h Netherlands The 6708PB, 1,Wageningen, Droevendaalsesteeg University, Wageningen Entomology, 2 , 9 ) ) ieauervesprcnietaealso are continent per reviews Literature . olwd,oe 00seiso insects of species 2000 over Worldwide, . A mn cd U uoenUnion. European EU, acid; amino AA, .vnHi,[email protected] email Huis, van A. : fl ( 3 usind dbeiscsa natraiepoensuc o ua odadanimal and food human ef conversion for feed the high source emissions, prompt gas been protein greenhouse available has low alternative of area production terms meat an in land interesting of as limited are sustainability feed the insects the and Also Edible sources. meat questioned. protein for alternative demand for in search increase global The besco nfo n giutr:a prpit icpiayfcs uniyn its quantifying focus, disciplinary appropriate environmental gastronomy. sources, an protein conventional agriculture: allergies. to vi- value bene and a nutritional and insects pro- its food make are comparing strategies to of importance, conservation in of pathways toxicity number research a sector discuss by during and We world able consumption. affected Western insect spoilage the be encourage in to may issue posed pathogens, major safety a is Food with attitude Consumer dishes. contamination palatable into bene insects, turned some and meat have and conventional a also have as processed may aquafeed, content as protein They dis- inter- particular same PUFA. increasing in the is feed, about an more countries have as is Insects insects tropical there given. Edible in world, are potential. Western The examples people large the and regions. of In insects, tropical edible nutrition threatened. in value is in and est source high livelihoods mainly food into the eaten this streams but in are side cussed, insects species organic edible insect value of 2000 low role transform than to More ability products. their protein and use, land low ies, ) Asia , fi net sfo n ed noohg:Cnue cetne Ethno-entomology: acceptance: Consumer Entomophagy: feed: and food as Insects fl s aeurigfo aey piiigfrig osmracpac and acceptance consumer farming, optimising safety, food safeguarding ts, e n tes(2%.I the In %). (12 others and ies ( . 4 Open University Library , ‘ 5 h uueo nmlpout ntehmnde:hat and health diet: human the in products animal of future The ) ai America Latin , (2016), ( 10 dbeiscsaetefuture? the are insects Edible ) Representatives . 75 294 , niomna concerns environmental , on 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 – odOrLecture Orr Boyd 0 doi:10.1017/S0029665116000069 305 ( 6 , rodvnHuis van Arnold 7 urto:Fo safety Food Nutrition: ( 1 ) ) and and fi ilhat fet.Eil net edt be to need insects Edible effects. health cial , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at natraieadcnb osdrdete shuman as livestock either for feed considered as be or and can food and such present alternative Insects an considered. being con- are than meat other ventional sources protein alternative concerns, fare eas fenvironmental of Because elcdb it ihri,aogohr,meats others, among in, are diets higher traditional diets which by in replaced transition dietary global nrae eadi hstm eidi anyfrom The mainly coun- is 2015). developed %) from period (27 less tries time August %), (113 this countries developing consulted in land agricultural demand all FAOSTAT, increased of two-thirds %; than (68 more already is 07t 2050 to 2007 ( 12 ’ ( ) 11 iigicmsadubnsto rv a drive urbanisation and incomes Rising . ) hl h adae sdb livestock by used area land the while , ( 14 ) health , fi ciency, ( 15 – ) . uy2015 July 9 ( 13 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ) n nmlwel- animal and ( 13 ) . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society oad net,wihaeotncniee ihdis- with considered often are gust which attitude negative locust insects, in a have unavailability towards are Westerners (3) Besides, (examples caterpillars); time. clumped of winter groups less and swarms is occurrence their a n animals and man etr isaantiscsa food as insects against bias Western h ml adae eddt rdc gprotein kg 1 produce to needed area land small the ilgclfcs(e,freape,catr2o Van of ethno- 2 an chapter have examples, Itterbeeck often for Huis, (see, which focus articles be biological to items from has food information these extracted the take Therefore, not consideration. do into statistics National insects. ntdNtosFaeokCneto nClimate the on by Convention set target Framework to Change order temperature-increase Nations in 2°C needed United be the still will meet changes dietary enough; utrlamnaemissions ammonia cultural blt ocnetogncsd tem nhg au pro- value high in streams products side tein organic convert to ability hi ef their siae ob tlatU$5 ilo annually billion 57 US$ least at be to estimated wildlife quanti and pollination been control, have pest nutrition, burial, dung as such utiaiiyo etcnupin npriua rumin- particular meat in ant consumption, meat of sustainability epnil o oeta 4%o l rehuegas greenhouse all of % 14 than (CH emissions more for responsible elh iefrpeetadftr generations future to and and security present nutrition for and life food healthy to contribute which It changing. de gradually agencies. is international attitude of this agenda that now the only time is long a for taeisi ietc production livestock in strategies iecnieigtelweiso fgenos gases greenhouse of emission low the considering tive rmntr.Hrioosisc pce eedon depend species insect Herbivorous nature. from r mle hni h rpc,poal u oterre- tracheas) their in to oxygen due zones of probably temperature (diffusion tropics, system the in spiratory in species than reasons. smaller insect yield several are (1) not are will because: zones There temperate much, in long? nature so from Harvesting for neglected been ti dif is It in sector new viable a it make agriculture. to and forward food indi- way we Finally, the attitudes. process- mentioned cate consumer and and be safety marketing food value, ing, will nutritional aquaculture the demands, in as particular brie insects of in use The feed world. recent Western the the afterwards in and developments food traditional are they where inadsaed uked utrdma n insects and meat proposed cultured been duckweed, have seaweed, and tion ftettletmtdisc pce ntewrd(be- world the in species insect 2 estimated total tween the of % fi hsi atydet h mhsso utial diets, sustainable on emphasis the to due partly is This h aeiscsa ua odi h etr world Western the in food human as insects have Why is h aigo net ilb icse nareas in discussed be will insects of eating the First e stoedeswt o niomna impacts environmental low with diets those as ned fl ( 17 .W ildsushwt amiscst etfuture meet to insects farm to how discuss will We y. ) https://www.cambridge.org/core h atri o justi not is latter The . fi fi ( 27 · ( utt siaetepretg fpol eating people of percentage the estimate to cult 5and3 in edcneso ef conversion feed cient 13 , 28 ) a enqetoe stelvsoksco is sector livestock the as questioned been has , ) oueohrpoensucsi nte op- another is sources protein other use To . ( 32 4 ) net staiinlfood traditional as Insects n NH and . ( 33 · 7million ( 19 ) .Teiscsaemil harvested mainly are insects The ). ( ) 29 h au feooia services, ecological of value The . ) net r nitrsigalterna- interesting an are Insects . 4 ) ( 24 fi ( ( ) 18 dfrteUAaoeadis and alone USA the for ed 25 . Open University Library n 9%o h lblagri- global the of % 59 and ) fi ) r amu o plants, for harmful are ) mlmnigmitigation Implementing . d osdrn ht<0 that considering ed, fi ciencies ( 21 ( 24 , 22 , 26 ) ) a determined has ( 15 ilntbe not will ) , on n their and , dbeiscsaeteftr?295 future? the are insects Edible 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 ( ( 23 20 ( 16 ) ) The . .The ) ;(2) ( ( 31 30 · 2 ) ) , , ua fastridwl ikom scommercially is pov- to silkworm, contribute alleviation Madagascar, wild erty in sericulture saturniid for a reared of pupae nswihaentaalbei tpefo.Bukkens food. staple in available not are which ents rsrainadmnal nrdcn aeplast a to caterpillars introducing manually cultivation, and preservation shifting dance, htterlst noc hmaeete eko non- or weak either are them showed enforce Zimbabwe to existent in rules study the a cat- that parks, Mopane national the as in such erpillar products forest non-timber vest aeon hyaecnue ytemjrt fthe of majority the and by Basin consumed Congo inhabitants are the they In tropics. Cameroon, humid the throughout phoenicis nsbShrnArcncutismil bene mainly communities rural countries impoverished African in women sub-Saharan in delegorguei Encosternum ilo S uies anycridotby out carried mainly business, 85 an US$ women is Africa caterpillar Southern million in Mopane Saturniidae) (Lepidoptera: are: the Examples women. harvesting of particular in livelihoods, prove in limited are which larvae. AA pro- weevil tubers aromatic palm the time, and same tryptophan the At vide AA. which those tubers The larvae in the limited weevil taro. of are that palm and complements the leucine) yam of and (lysine potato, composition with (AA) sweet Guinea, combination acid sago, in amino New as consumed such Papua are staples larvae In of weevil cereals. Republic palm Democratic lysine-poor comple- nutritionally the menting lysine, In provide examples. caterpillars Congo, few a gives xliain nutial avsigmethods, and harvesting transformation use land pesticide commercialisation, unsustainable increased exploitation, 180 30 income. of representing income activities monthly economic generated, average all an in- of lectors of % 20 source than (agriculture, important more an often come, is communities dependent rdcs oa ouain a lob nacdby caterpil- enhanced for be example lars for also measures, can semi-domestication forest populations non-timber the Local regulate of time structure products. same market the the at and and harvesting resource the of sustain- use enhance able that systems management local adaptive ewe xasino iersre n ieharvest) rice and reserves high (period are rice prices season food lean when of the exhaustion during species between a insect with people of intake example, protein number available For their year. not supplement the Madagascar are of from period which certain sources a com- during protein often insects other be Edible plement often year. can the species throughout insect collected aquatic har- Also year-round possible. makes on vesting which ed- available certain depends are species there insect collection season ible every their in However, therefore season. the and plants, food , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at h aveo h fia amweevil palm African the of larvae The h avsigadmreigo dbeiscscnim- can insects edible of marketing and harvesting The oee,ftr avssmyb hetndb over- by threatened be may harvests future However, ( 43 ) aiuaighs redsrbto n abun- and distribution tree host manipulating : ( ( 36 42 , ) 37 Clotr:Cruinde r oua food popular are Curculionidae) (Coleoptera: idnso hssuysgettene for need the suggest study this of Findings . ( ) 39 h aktn fteEil stinkbug Edible the of marketing the ; ( 40 fi ) hi xliainadtaeb forest- by trade and exploitation Their . hn,hnig t..Frpoesoa col- professional For etc.). hunting, shing, , 41 ( 34 ) ) lhuhprisaerqie ohar- to required are permits Although . . ( 34 Hmpea Tessaratomidae) (Hemiptera: ) – fe net rvd nutri- provide insects Often . 5%o hi household their of % 75 fi ergms ottree host regimes, re https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms mrsabelina Imbrasia Rhynchophorus – 0 S is US$ 600 ( 38 ) edible ; fi ( 35 ts ) . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society ua od hpe fteeooyo man of ecology 2000 the to of 1988 chapter published a DeFoliart book his food; in world the human over all from eating insect net htaelclyavailable locally are that insects h ulcto fteFo n Agricultural Korean, in translated and been Italian has and Food and French times million the security seven feed and of food book publication Organization the ‘ rces h elwmealworm Yellow the crickets, products: bars, cricket-based of development protein the in much very (http://www.wageningenacademic.com/loi/jiff). scienti ic tcno eecue htptoei bacteria pathogenic that infect may environment excluded pathogens production the be medium. from parasitic spores) nutrient cannot (and or the it or viral environment Since farming with the circumstances, infected from hygienic get controlled, would under Council Health and farmed Superior Chain were the Food of the Board concluded: of Scienti the Safety by the the validated for Belgium, Agency Federal in 2014 eea odsft n eeiayof veterinary Swiss and The e.g. safety Netherlands. consumed, food and The federal produced and be Switzerland to Belgium, allowed food are guarantee insects to order as in such systems protocols, safety. tracing hy- self-imposed and strict They track follow they measures. or which giene in pet consumption, as human for insects producing fi companies, rearing insect led n18,aboltapae ya nls ento- English an by appeared booklet mologist a 1885, in Already later. discussed be ed- will of which rearing species the insect is ible possibility Another area. designated 296 n giutr raiainadWageningen and forty- from partici- Organisation 450 attracted pants which Netherlands the Agriculture in University and okok aebe rdcd oewt recipes with world the some over all in produced, from either of insects been number freeze-dried, from A have web-ordered. bought be about be cookbooks can they also contain or can supermarkets which mealworm insects company) Lesser the (pro- of Belgian the nuggets in % a 16 and outlets by schnitzels 500 duced burger, than sells more Netherlands with chain supermarket locust toria Migratory the and Tenebrionidae) mealworm Lesser n elom spr fapandrvso of revision planned a of grasshoppers part crickets, of as sale Switzerland the mealworms back and they that 2015 nett edteworld the feed to Insect hfo,hv e pseilpouiglnsfrinsects for lines producing special up set have food, sh nteUA h neeto h rvt etrhsbeen has sector private the of interest the USA, the In eea uoencutishv elrdta certain that declared have countries European Several https://www.cambridge.org/core Ototr:Ardde r aktd n21,one 2015, In marketed. are Acrididae) (Orthoptera: fi cjournal h o a insects eat not Why dbeiscsi h etr world Western the in insects Edible ’ ‘ a oenn foodstuff governing law s tseshgl nieyta net that insects that unlikely highly seems it ( 45 fl ) olwd neetwsgnrtdwith generated was interest Worldwide . u n oke.I uoe besides Europe, In cookies. and our net sFo n Feed and Food as Insects fi ( 33 ecountries ve lhtbu diaperinus Alphitobius ) dbeiscs uuepopcsfor prospects future insects: Edible nte os a h conference the was boost Another . h odIscsNewsletter Insects Food The hc a onoddmr than more downloaded was which ’ onl raie yteFood the by organised jointly . Open University Library ( 44 fl ) u.I h Netherlands, the In our. Bodenheimer . ( 46 ( fi 48 ) omte fthe of Committee c eeromolitor Tenebrio .InJanuary2015,a ) nteNetherlands, the In . ( 47 fi ( 49 eanucdin announced ce ) ) nSeptember In . n oewith some and out migra- Locusta , on (Coleoptera: a started was ( 1 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 ) net as Insects reviewed Gene . the , from .vnHuis van A. , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at ntefo n giutr nutyi wasted is industry agriculture and organic food on produce the reared the be of in one-third can because they interesting streams, that side is mealworms the and rcesadslwrs h datg fthe of locusts/grasshoppers/ advantage mealworms, The extent silkworms. and lesser crickets a to and omnhouse illuscens Common Hermetia aelmttosdet naacdA pro AA unbalanced to due limitations products feeds, have vegetable vegetable-based these as However, soya-based. such primarily sources, protein other for 9%o global of sector % 29 traditionally the which that feed, means been of has volumes aquaculture growing of requires growth rapid lg,odour, ology, ihAlni amnsoe htrpaeetof replacement that showed salmon fi Atlantic with otelts lblrpr rmteFo n Agriculture and UN Food the the of wild from Organization according report from global 2012 latest in than the parity to farms almost reached from having capture, originated have but will sumption allowed, we Therefore, yet 2013. attention. not since more some is aquafeed this as give poultry used and are as they pigs insects (http://tinyurl. (EU), for feed Union feedstock and European food meal the as October In insects insect com/p5dym9u). In re- of a of risks legislation. published about Authority the the tons port Safety Food is in produce European challenge the companies to 2015, main of up The number geared daily. A are issues considered. safety soldier world food be then Black transformed but to manure The be need on products. reared way be protein even this can value in high can into products organic value net a lob sda edtc o es ietc and livestock pets, for feedstock as fi used be also can Insects as insect of discussed. sector shortly The emerging. be is will sec- food feed the as interest insects increased of the tor with However, scale. small ihuefrhmnconsumption human for use with fi of prices obcde n h aigtdgrasshopper Variegated the the and mealworm, Yellow Bombycidae) silkworm insect Calliphoridae), Domesticated different of (Diptera: soldier meal Black them fl as feeding such by species results tive n hsgot setrl u oaquaculture to tonnes due 36 entirely with % is 24 growth by grow this to expected and is 2030 to 2010 fi ihu des fet ntentgot fthe of growth net the on effects adverse without eoetepout r u nt akto con- or market to on put are products sumed indispensable is the (minimally frying) step stir before heating or a frying consumers, cooking, blanching, its and insects the h h addt netseisaeteBaksoldier Black the are species insect candidate The sh. helwt elo h lc soldier Black the of meal with shmeal r otn,at-urtoa atr n competition and factors anti-nutritional content, bre ,teOina latrine Oriental the y, hre.Hwvr capture However, sheries. te ietc and livestock Other o the For ’ ( 50 ) fi h ntaie ypiaeetrrs r still are enterprise private by initiatives The . fi fi helhge hnee n oe h need the poses and ever than higher shmeal heland shmeal s iei itr,more history, in time rst fl fi vu/at n texture and avour/taste fl hsok n2011 in stocks sh y uc domestica Musca net sfeed as Insects fi Dpea taimia) the Stratiomyidae), (Diptera: hseista aesonposi- shown have that species sh ( fi 52 hol ycthfo capture from by-catch oil, sh ) obxmori Bombyx fl h rdcinof production The . y fi hre r overexploited: are sheries hyoy megacephala Chrysomya fl ,Dmsiae house Domesticated y, ( ( 54 52 , ) 55 Dpea Muscidae) (Diptera: fi hsmksworld makes This . https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ) hfrhmncon- human for sh ( et conducted Tests . 54 ) . fl (Lepidoptera: spossible is y fi fl e,high- les, ( fi fi yspecies 51 ( 53 hfrom sh h hist- sh, ) ) .Low The . fl fl y y . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society isenee,adpouto hogotteyear. the throughout Thailand production in and Also needed, tissue rmtewl sirglradivle h destruction the Cameroon involves in and weevil raf irregular palm is of African wild the supply the The of from insects. larvae the farm na- the to from of made collected are are efforts but countries ture, tropical in insects Most r:hge rdcin esta ure fteraf the of quarter a than harvesting less wild raf production, over system fresh higher this are: containing of boxes advantages collected The in of sues. weevils introduction palm the adult involving developed were rlia)adbolrcikn eefdgrain-based conversion fed protein relevance, were economic ef of scale chickens a at broiler diets and Gryllidae) Oonincx Congo ( nus atso eealsadfruits and vegetables of wastes pro- level. to protein used high be with could aerial leaves crickets taro cassava unused duce of crickets young made only produce diets on rice or while to parts biomass, based brown used total high are be and a bananas) with leaves should without cassava or crickets (with Young the resources. of wild diet the netfrigi xadn ail n fessigni offers and rapidly expanding is farming insect vrg f70 erctne fiscsanal for annually market insects the of for and tonnes consumption metric home 7500 of average developed. fpoent rdtoa livestock source traditional alternative to sustain- high-quality protein a cricket as of and produced cost-effective mass the able, is Gryllidae) Cambodia, (Orthoptera: of rie chickens broiler variegatus Zonocerus eindta atr rti rmsaebe o value low scaleable, from protein capture identi that be designed cricket the should of side-streams what survival Species and organic on populations. growth adequate low-quality part, support Very sustainable not large may fed. more in are a depends, crickets in protein of result supply will consumption human i aea feto avlftcnetadftyacid fatty and content fat larval on that effect pro diets an on have stable did was 2 the content differed protein species: Larval worm. mealworm brewing, mealworm edible tus Giant the three beer mealworm, Yellow bioethanol on and from processing production potato originating baking, bread/cookie by-products ganic noeadlvlho potnte o eso thou- process- farming, marketing of insect and in transport tens engaged ing, for people Thai opportunities of sands livelihood and income Achatina fi h elwmawrsi eiowr rdcdon produced were Mexico in mealworms Yellow The nTaln,2 0 oetcciktfrspouean produce farms cricket domestic 000 20 Thailand, In oipoetehat ttso epei province a in people of status health the improve To hnHuecrickets House When iniswr similar were ciencies ( fi 61 Clotr:Tnbinde n h esrmeal- Lesser the and Tenebrionidae) (Coleoptera: le. – 67 https://www.cambridge.org/core fi ( 71 ) ecosystems a ( ) n ano trout Rainbow and ; 75 – ) -odi rti otn,weesdeayfat dietary whereas content, protein in 3-fold amn ytm o hsisc r being are insect this for systems farming spp.) tde h feto it opsdo or- of composed diets of effect the studied ( 56 ( 60 , ( 57 ) 70 fia cat African , ) ) tilapia ; netfarming Insect Ototr:Proopia)are: Pyrgomorphidae) (Orthoptera: ( n h eortcRpbi of Republic Democratic the and 39 ( ) 76 hrfr,frigsystems farming Therefore, . ceadomesticus Acheta ) hte ern rcesfor crickets rearing Whether . . ( Open University Library ( 55 nohnhsmykiss Oncorhynchus 72 , ) 58 . , eegylstestaceus Teleogryllus 59 ( 74 fi ( ) 73 ) sh fia in snail giant African , a Broekhoven, Van . ) o htreason, that For . fi dadprocesses and ed ( lra gariepi- Clarias 70 ohbsatra- Zophobas ) nThailand, In . (Orthoptera: , on dbeiscsaeteftr?297 future? the are insects Edible 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 fi ( fi 68 tis- a cant , 69 fi ) a . net sivrertsd o aeamnrlsdskel- mineralised because a calcium have not little do eton contain invertebrates insects as insects of species Most h rti otn nadymte ai finsects of ap- contain basis species protein many % dry-matter and 60 %; a proximately 91 and on 7 between range content protein The dbeiscspoiestsatrl h eurdes- required the Most satisfactorily Yi source. and AA. provide protein sential proteins insects alternative in In rich valuable edible are threonine. a locusts) (grass- and represent sometimes and Orthoptera order lysine crickets the hoppers, and from tryptophane, high species the in with tyrosine particular, + AA general phenylalanine rich for in WHO being for the insects of values edible requirements the compositions, meet nutrient 236 at cd fiscsaegnrlycmaal with comparable PUFA generally more contain are but and insects poultry of of those acids fatty navnaea antiinteei fe oeaprob- a de more energy often of is there lem malnutrition as advantage an hslra(7% shge hnteaon on in found chicken, amount beef, of the milk as basis) than such and weight foods higher egg in dry protein is conventional delicacy a %) most (67 a (on larva considered content this are lipid The weevil Nigeria. palm African the 3%frClotr bels grubs) (beetles, to Coleoptera locusts) crickets, for (grasshoppers, from % 33 Orthoptera ranging insects, for edible % 13 of of portion composition largest nutrient second the the represents fat protein, After extraction aqueous simple sol- a the by procedure. using obtained gels appli- form fractions conventional can food uble proteins future insect with of that is terms comparable cations in one was of Promising products. content and species meat protein species insect that concluded mealworm the They three species. from cricket fractions tein hrd n opnn fteeokltno insects. of Schlüter exoskeleton and the Rumpold polysac- of to a of chitin, According component to part bound and a is because protein charide cuticular partly in variable, AA highly the is insects from n htpro)adee ihteaayia methods analytical the with developmental humidity even used (temperature, and gender, environment photoperiod) species, the and and with diet varies stage, it because ilA n at cd swl svtmn n miner- and vitamins as well as acids fatty als and AA tial ti dif is It consumed presently livestock. conventional not by are which side-streams, organic , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at ( 35 ( ( , 77 77 78 ) ) ) fi eea netseis uha rces palm crickets, as such species, insect Several . ayseisaerc npoenadft essen- fat, and protein in rich are species Many . hywl ervee brie reviewed be will They . utt eeaietentiinlvleo insects, of value nutritional the generalise to cult ( 80 tal et ) ndvlpn onre,ti a be can this countries, developing In . fi inyta rti de protein than ciency . ( rti content Protein Micronutrients 79 fi hi hi ereo unsaturation, of degree their in sh ) a content Fat Nutrition xrce n hrceie pro- characterised and extracted ( 77 ( 77 , 78 ) h ietblt fprotein of digestibility The . ) . fl y. ( ( 78 78 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ) ) h aveof larvae The . h compiled who , fi ciency ( 81 ) The . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society spider ic opr agns n magnesium and manganese the iron, of of for intake sample copper, composition daily g 100 recommended mineral the zinc, a meet that the will shows insect of weevil prevalence palm Results the African reduce stunting. not did with it of compared However, diet. anaemic, usual were the fewer and concentration 12 ore odsc stelocal the as such animal food using studied sourced was products forti food complementary micronutrient Cambodia, en 1gft 0gcroyrt,ad12 and carbohydrate, g 40 fat, 1840 g 21 containing 12 tein, g aged (100 infants g and 45 daily cereal pillar 6 aged Infants eelmd ihctrilr n sda a months 18 as and 6 used between and aged infants caterpillars feed- in complementary with ings to supplement made micronutrient-rich bene the cereal Congo, of Republic lrdae frsac nwiheil net may insects edible which in research bene a of have area plored fmnrl nhmnsbet rmeil insects. weight). acid edible folic ribo cases raw from retinol some in in subjects low rich g generally zinc/100 but human are insects vitamins, in mg Concerning bioavailability (16 the minerals high local on needed its of in zinc are of studies traded because more However, and of used was Cambodia spider content in The eaten markets. food is latter The iual nNgraadteDmcai eulcof Republic Democratic the 79 par- which and Africa, of sub-Saharan Nigeria Congo 2015, in in in are 200 404 ticularly respectively, about %, about 88 to from and 2010 one-third in by 800 increase 305 will globally anaemia faut fteLse mealworm Lesser the homogenate of of a by adults development blocked be of the could pharmaceutical mice Also or in parkinsonism obesity. supplement nutritional against devel- a intervention for as potential it mice. suggesting oping reduced, high-fat-induced-obese was fat on Visceral larvae Scarabaeidae) beetle noceros ikigactivity anti- for tested insect were nine edible, sickling are from two which extracts among methanol species, Congo, of Republic oeta 7%frzinc for de % zinc 17 for risk than at propor- population more the world as interesting the is of This tion in iron. rich and be zinc to of shown content were caterpillars and termites weevils, iency niiinefc f1 .Afweape ilb given medication. be in will insects examples of few caterpillar use A potential %. edible the 11 of of the effect while inhibition inhibition, lactea Elaphrodes % 60 showed madagascariensis Chrysiridia 298 o icae3 n 1% 51 and these 36 females; adult are cover for for iron zinc would % for 53 crickets intake for and nutrient g males 10 recommended adult Assuming the %, content. of 10 zinc % of 114 and iron bio-availability high a a have to proved · h siae ubro ebrswt ikecell sickle with newborns of number estimated The Yoon gZ) nat ntecra ru a ihrHb higher had group cereal the in Infants Zn). mg 7 https://www.cambridge.org/core ( 83 ( 87 ) Haplopelma nasuyi ey,cikt n termites and crickets Kenya, in study a In . ) tal et nteKtnaPoic fteDemocratic the of Province Katanga the In . fi ilhat effect. health cial – . ( 2mnh eepoie ih3 cater- g 30 with provided were months 12 89 fl ) vn attei cd itnadin and biotin acid, pantothenic avin, loyiadichotoma Allomyrina ( Lpdpea oootde a an had Notodontidae) (Lepidoptera: 88 diitrdgon aaeerhi- Japanese ground administered ) ( h o-dbecaterpillar non-edible The . p Aaee Theraphosidae) (Araneae: sp. 77 , 78 ) . ( . 82 Open University Library ) · 6k 40ka) 3gpro- g 23 kcal), (440 kJ 96 fi ( n 5%frio de iron for % 25 and Lpdpea Uraniidae) (Lepidoptera: 84 swr netgtdo a of investigated were ts ) fi nteDemocratic the In . aini rice-based in cation ( 90 fi ) hsi nunex- an is This . hadtarantula and sh – 8mnh with months 18 · gF and Fe mg 7 , on (Coleoptera: 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 fi inyis ciency ( 80 fi ) .In gures ( ( fi 85 86 .vnHuis van A. c- ) ) . . , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at hog olcnatadteMpn aepla is caterpillar caterpillar, Mopane this for the Therefore soil. Mujuru and the on hygienically. sun-dried contact introduced often produced be the soil can is be bacteria through that should spore-forming and example, insects possible For well that very reason is pathogens human ompwe a xeln osmracceptance consumer excellent had powder worm in u o8% fYlo elompwe nbasic in powder mealworm Yellow of acid %) oleic 8 fl to % 20 (up tions of GC by composition (determined tryptophan) acids acid and linoleic essential fatty nine tyrosine in and a (rich phenylalanine, had protein as and % such 58 AA contained powder The netpouesadcmaisdvlpn insect-based products. developing food companies and producers insect rtclCnrlPit ytmi ieyue ap- used widely a is and system Analysis Points Hazard proach the Control process, Critical production during prevent contamination food To biological the contamination. and prevent chemical physical, to practices turing ert iudo hc h du srplieto repulsive is odour the which of liquid man a secrete nterlcllnug the language local their in hc setni etAfrica West in eaten grasshop- is French Variegated which in the palat- is called insect species the per, toxic making Another to chemical, able. methods defence preparation by the uses immobilised population remove is necessitates local insect This The the worn. cold. when not vi- harvesting is affects gear nocturnal and skin protective the Yet, stains that sion. chemical defence a has otn fwne emtso h species the of grasshopper termites subhylanus winged of the content ribo the and Tettigoniidae) of niacin (Orthoptera: and toasting digestibility Kenya, protein content reduced in drying example, solar For nutritional and insects. the edible on of effect an value have can methods Processing fia h dbesiku sconsumed is stinkbug edible the insect. Africa, the consumers to (4) reaction harvest; allergic an after in- the experience spoiled (3) could become cycle; can patho- life could its human risks during sect insect or environment the its substances safety (2) from toxic; toxic gens food be acquired could have itself which insect could there the through insects, (1) i.e. edible ways arise, of with context four dealing the when are In importance sources. special food of new is safety Food n at,wiettlplpeo otn n anti- of and concentration content the with polyphenol powder the increased total activity while oxidative taste, and u a cetbesnoypoete,sc as such properties, sensory acceptable had our custo yeil net ftxcsbtne or substances toxic of insects edible by Acquisition nMxc,trilssplmne ihYlo meal- Yellow with supplemented tortillas Mexico, In nKra muf Korea, In oetxcisc pce r ae.I Southern In eaten. are species insect toxic Some ( 96 ) ( h oui otenCmro alteinsect the call Cameroon Northern in Mofu The . 99 tal et ) n hudb dpe ycmeca edible commercial by adopted be should and , ( 91 ( 93 ) . ) . ( 98 . odsft n legislation and safety Food rcsigadmarketing and Processing ) tesdgo avsigadmanufac- and harvesting good stressed fi speae ihdfeetconcentra- different with prepared ns ‘ rqe puant criquet ‘ osnlocust poison ( 95 ) hnmlse,they molested, When . upladifferens Ruspolia https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ’ sikn locust), (stinking fl vnadretinol and avin ’ ( ( 94 97 – ) Macrotermes ) MS). h insect The . . fl avour ( 92 ) . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society n omtcAct Cosmetic and 2015/2283). Regulation (EU level EU at tralised in eto nlblepr aeadawrigthat warning a and date expiry heavy consump- label before or on treatment mention pesticides another tion; mycotoxins, or of thermal metals); (free substrate ing Practices. Manufacturing rprylble Sc 0) h ae hudinclude should label speci The stored 403). scienti be the must (Sec. packaged, and labelled produced, conditions, properly sanitary been under transported have and must toxins), a iteicniet neti eeomn n produc- and development in invest tion to incentive enterprises little private had conducive; not was legislation existing eiwdi h EU the in reviewed eaae rmiscs r culycloser actually are phylum. arthropod insects, the from towards widely of taxonomically reactions separated be to order allergic considered long whether same Crustaceans, another is the question have insects, roasted the would and powdered they crustaceans, and/or acidi % mites 20 successful shelf-life. safeguarding in in or effective demonstrated resulted was and 10 larvae mealworm containing acidify- composite or of drying tures are fermentation refrigerator Lactic a of ing. use the techniques than other Preservation Enterobacteriaceae. eliminated Verhoeckx cricket, prawn cross-reactivity for the responsible argin- be between allergen to found The was occur. kinase ine to seem does Cross-reactivity ecint te netseis uha grasshoppers as glyceraldehyde-3- such reported species, been have and insect locusts, and allergic other and Food to enolase locusts. locusts reaction fried raw in in dehydrogenase kinase, in phosphate kinase present arginine being pyruvate and hexamerin enolase for both: except differed locusts identi Proteins endcae oe odadaesbett simpler, a to subject ef are more and and food clearer novel declared been a n os crickets House lar- and mealworm Yellow stored vae and processed fresh, of tent hti h neddue(e.21) odiscsmust insects from Food free 201f). (i.e. wholesome (Sec. and use clean intended be the is that osntse oapyt hl net stede the as insects whole Regulation to Food apply states Novel to seem The not food. does novel considered be nsvrlE onre lhuhwe o consumed not when although countries ‘ EU several in utrlps nTaln,btas oua food locust popular Bombay also but the Thailand, using in pest shrimp cultural with to investigated succincta Patanga was allergic This protein. al- insects. the sera mealworm alter edible can of Yellow (frying) processing lergenicity thermal containing will of effect mites food The dust house to to react allergic patients that possibility nasigni a in nteUA dbeiscsfl ne h od Drug Food, the under fall insects edible USA, the In susta edt etknit con r:cenrear- clean are: account into taken be to need that Issues h eilto ocrigeil net a been has insects edible concerning legislation The oepol aea leg oad ihrhuedust house either towards allergy an have people Some Klunder ( 107 fi al o ua odfloigcretGood current following food human for cally ‘ https://www.cambridge.org/core ) odigeinsioae rmanimals from isolated ingredients food oee,sne2 oebr21,iscshave insects 2015, November 25 since However, . rlu bimaculatus Gryllus fi fi atdegree cant aeo h net net utb raised be must Insects insect. the of name c tal et tal et fi da outalresi a n fried and raw in allergens locust as ed . . ( ( 100 103 Ototr:Ardde,amjragri- major a Acrididae), (Orthoptera: ( ) 108 ( ) fi 29 Macrobrachium vlae h irbooia con- microbiological the evaluated in uhrsto rcdr cen- procedure authorisation cient ocue htteei realistic a is there that concluded ) ) net r led oda food as sold already are Insects . net r osdrdfo if food considered are Insects . ’ eoe1 a 97 hymay they 1997, May 15 before ( 100 . Ototr:Gryllidae) (Orthoptera: Open University Library ) hr etn step heating short A . ( 105 ) . p.adthe and spp. fl fi u/ae mix- our/water t,pathogens, lth, , on dbeiscsaeteftr?299 future? the are insects Edible ’ ( 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 106 fi fi ) cation nition The . ( ( ( fi 102 101 104 eld ) ) ) . . . lotebae ointa h aigo net sa it. is of insects of part eating not the are that food notion as ‘ biased insects the and Also copied often nTaln,pol r utrlyepsdt edible famil- and to taste of exposed terms culturally in acceptance. iarity considered its are are for which people important insects experi- also Thailand, and is Familiarity food In meat. the for with substitute ence a as insects 2. 7 )adIda(4%,wr iln od so do to willing were %), (74 India USA background, and groups cultural non-consuming %) different (72 two completely of a majority from The food? sect a enpooe ohresdsuta oiiefeature positive Rozin a what as insects, disgust of harness to proposed been has edrsest aea fet e,bt in both men, effect; an have to Belgium seems Gender deo h aueo itr faptnilfood. potential food as a insects rejecting of totally history persons or for identison nature the been on has the based disgust Interestingly, primarily of not knowl- is on rather edge It but foods, years. potential 5 of properties sensory and age the 2 between about period the of in arising acquired, entirely markets. be city be to should it strategy bring marketing to a place that in means practice the food toal ae,ti sntagnrlpatc n in and practice as general increasing insects a With exist. may not of af aversion trad- same is are rejection the areas insects this urban strong where the tropics eaten, on a the itionally been in is Even never food. there have human insects and world, menu, Western the In consumption. human set for have lines that production companies special rearing buy up locusts); insect (e.g. from legs insects and only wings con- remove to insects; similarly suming react could crustaceans to allergic people 1. consumption: who food. as participants mealworms associ- Dutch with This the familiar matter. more amongst decaying were absent in was lar- see with often ation association they the that to vae due mealworms, by repulsed 0%nwad6 n2050 about in to % 1950 64 in and % now 18 from % 50 increasing went with which countries developed urbanisation, less in diminish may euirhbto rmtv man primitive of habit peculiar , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at fl r epewligt osdretn oefr fin- of form some eating consider to willing people Are h igsigrato nteWsenwrdapasto appears world Western the in reaction disgusting The ubro taeisaepooe ofcltt insect facilitate to proposed are strategies of number A ec,Wsenlfsye n aigpten are patterns eating and lifestyles Western uence, ecie bene perceived insects urto n niomna sustainability environmental and nutrition bene the about information Providing inpoesn n esnlexperience personal and processing tion Bene iigpol at xeine h so-called the experience, taste a ‘ people Giving oepstv tiuetwrsetmpaythan not a had entomophagy had who towards people before, the attitude insects positive eaten more had who Netherlands, ( u banquets bug 22 ( 113 ) ilnthl nispplrsto.Tepractice The popularisation. its in help not will , ) ( 112 oee,Ta atcpnswr strongly were participants Thai However, . fi ecpini eie rmhuitcinforma- heuristic from derived is perception t nIdaadteUA h otcommon most the USA, the and India In . ) n h USA the and ’ ( osmrattitudes Consumer 17 fi so dbeiscswr eae to related were insects edible of ts ) osmr nAsrlaadThe and Australia in Consumers . tal et . ( ( 110 111 ( 114 ) ) ( 109 ) r oelkl oadopt to likely more are aldbng masochism. benign called . ) h otnainof continuation The . fi da h anrea- main the as ed ( 1 ) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms rstarvation or , fi ( so edible of ts 115 ) . ( 110 ( ( ) 110 110 .It ) ) . . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society ietc.Dsilnsivle r:fo n nutrition, mini- and certainly as food and farmed are: forests, when involved agriculture from Disciplines of livestock. come part only become they not do insects nanme fcutisbtas tteFo and Food are insects the edible as at are Department insects also classi Forestry edible the but UN, by the countries hosted of of Organization number Agricultural a In 8. 4. 5. 7. 6. 3. 300 odsft sgaate,sol eavailable. be should affordable. be guaranteed, should price is the Besides safety food food Availability delicious. on it based making be perception: should Acceptability behaviours. rdal nraigcnetain fiscsin insects of facilitated that concentrations suggested it fl been increasing and also gradually accepted readily has It insects insects commercialisation. edible processed with these familiar Consumers, ruet sn niomna n urtoa ben- nutritional e and environmental using arguments ikpreto slkl ob eie rmdelibera- from processing derived information be to tive likely is perception Risk itdwt aigiscs nomto a enas scienti seen by was provided Information the when insects. asso- trustworthy and risks eating no Australia with were ciated in there that respondents indicated Netherlands the of majority na swl swt h hfco foeo the of one of world in cook Denmark) chef Ko the Kopenhagen, the Nations (Noma, with restaurants United as best the well as of Annan for- general the secretary with mer conducted were models interviews Cookbook, role point). next Use (see menu insects the top-down have on restaurants the expensive which to in contrary approach approach, bottom-up the niaigtesseai rxmt naia classi animal in proximity systematic the Indicating (http://www.eater.com/2015/6/ the world among are the 1/8699487/the-worlds-50-best-new-restaurants-2015). 2015 in insects in best declared where ten been Brazil, both Paulo, have served, Saõ in restaurant aen r oecoeyrltdta a generally was than related closely thought more are taceans Gastronomy aea iko aiginsects eating of dis- risk and a microbes as perceived ease respondents the of half safety food about information Providing ta okdudrpesr n rcse into processed and muf pressure under crackers, cooked lake steam and products familiar termites into insects Processing rmn n elkonrltvs u o when persons not famous gov- or but producers the relatives, food product, by well-known promoted the and using ernment with familiar persons iiaeteitgaino noohg nour in entomophagy of behaviours and integration habits feeding the cilitate crustaceans and insects between cation https://www.cambridge.org/core fi fi u ih eeffective be might our swl o eeog ocag netrltdfood insect-related change to enough be not will ts da o-odfrs rdcs oee,edible However, products. forest non-wood as ed ( 101 ( ) 48 dbeiscs fwihteqaiyand quality the which of insects, Edible . . Deroy . ) hsrsarn n h D.O.M. the and restaurant This . fi icpiayfocus Disciplinary s asgsadma loaf meat and sausages ns, a forward Way o xml nTeInsect The in example For . fl tal et e eebkd oldand boiled baked, were ies . Open University Library ( 110 . ( 118 ( ) 115 hshsbe called been has This . ) ( ) 117 . ( rudta rational that argued 110 ) net n crus- and Insects . ) ovrey the Conversely, . hscudfa- could This . fi nteUSA, the In . researchers, c , on nKenya, In . 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 ( ( 116 114 .vnHuis van A. fi ) ) fi - . . , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at rmmawrsrte hnfo rdtoa farmed traditional from than animals rather mealworms from eerhr h eeitrse ntetpc e.g. topic, the Mexico in in interested Elorduy were Ramos who strong- researchers is country per in species ly insect edible of number The being (resources livestock), biodiversity for and feed (as threatened). aquaculture) as in husbandry reared feed be animal can production), they (food agriculture itei nw bu h ae otrn;ol one only footprint; ef water more is the it that about indicates known study estab- to is impact order Little in environmental needed production its urgently is lish gas This area. greenhouse land and energy, concerning studies odCmoiinDtbs o idvriy(BioFood Biodiversity analytical Comp) for Database suf Recently Composition with published Food databases. sources primary and and from data absent tables collected are data composition FAO/INFOODS since known food poorly insect in also of is extent intake trient Insects the trade. about and needed consumption is information More also may insects of consumption are uses. the insects medicinal time have the same how the marketed. and information and At when conserved time, consumed, on prepared, same gathered collected, the be to At needs con- necessary. human to for is countries used species sumption insect-eating insect of in number the effort identify systematic identi yet A not species edible. many still are there that n Oonincx and eortcRpbi fCongo of Republic Democratic ihqaiyiscsi ao rao research. side of ef area organic used conversion major a on be feed is high can reared insects achieve streams high-quality be to side order can which in question species The insect streams. of ber amfrteYlo mealworm Yellow one on the conducted study for analysis farm cycle life one for Except question. interesting an the is as feed enrich via such regulate, DHA ingredients and can EPA food acids, we certain quality How add nutritional and standardised. determine be to required vitamin should methods and with are mineral The composition, proteins compared acid content. fatty animal proteins on as other insect well as and of proteins quality plant the on data urtoa aus(umrsdb Bukkens by (summarised the on values conducted been nutritional have studies some quite Although fl ecdb h muto eerhefr fsome of effort research of amount the by uenced ( 120 ( 121 ) ) . n ftemjravnae sta num- a that is advantages major the of One . ( 77 ttsiso dbeinsects edible on Statistics ) n upl n Schlüter and Rumpold and Ethno-entomology Environment Nutrition ( 6 ( ) v. 119 ’ fi ( otiuint h nu- the to contribution 31 n aasei the in Malaisse and in ooti protein obtain to cient ) te rti sources. protein other ) hrfr,i slikely is it Therefore, . hr r oother no are there , fi in ult nthe in quality cient https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms fi fi fi da being as ed inyand ciency ( hre (as sheries 35 ( 78 n ) ) Finke , 3fatty -3 more ) . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society elwmealworm Yellow eylr n eopsr.Seista aebeen silkworm have Domesticated the mori that particular Species B. in as are decomposers. time same proposed the and at function insects recyclers which sup- chosen in life be small-scale system bioregenerative to port a need in Species function spaceship. can a that edible on using food Several of as them? possibility insects control the we at do looked how have dis- publications occur prevent they we if do epidemic how and And eases, persistence, man. for transmission, safety and range, potential phyl- characterisation, host genetic produc- and ogeny, large biological in them units: to rearing tion them when insect emerge about use that little very diseases to know we how However, knowl- insects. and some control output. entomopathogens quite highest acquired about have the edge we have protection, crop to conditions, In rearing optimise imposed companies that the expected which to (e.g. is cycle quickly It life adapt them possibilities. short insects certainly breeding The offers diseases)? insects by of to resistance insects for cer- of breeding improve genetically characteristics we Can differenttain species. of can use insect the species of is strains Which area unexplored used. An be purpose? which can that species different of advantages intensive the insects labour of possibilities of One less it? mechanising it and the the automating making by scale-up and to are process, How production gut-loading? or What (fasting) to de-gutting relation content? in insects ap- farmed the nutritional the is of What time are: researched harvest propriate be to need that Questions be to need crustaceans or mites dust studied. established. house having be to people to allergy needs by an life consumption shelf insect on of effect Cross-reactivity its conserve acryl- and to insects way the hydrocarbons, The heterocyclic furans. and as polyaromatic chloropropanols amide, such sub- amines, toxic contaminants, of of aromatic formation process the Processing or on effect antibiotics. stances an have and can insects fungicides, metals, heavy contaminants, pesticides, biphenyls, chemical is polychlorinated how dioxins, possible and as with such suitable are dealing streams ques- insect side the of the used, kind In are which research. is streams tion extensive side requires organic still when which particular area an is This anbefo oresol ebsdo odperception, food on based be should source food tainable n agtdta r otlkl al dpes n as and adopters; early likely Deroy most by identi stated are edible be that should how of targeted groups developed and rejection Consumer ways this. of and overcome basis investigated to be The factors should addressed. insects psychological be and to have Emotional may which mentioned. strategies been of number a paper, in this in Earlier fl ec osmracpac feil net have insects edible of acceptance consumer uence https://www.cambridge.org/core v. Lpdpea Bombycidae) (Lepidoptera: atooyadcnue attitudes consumer and Gastronomy ovninllvsoki htw aemany have we that is livestock conventional tal et ( 125 . ) ( netfarming Insect 118 . odsafety Food ) cetblt fiscsa sus- a as insects of acceptability . Open University Library ( 122 – 124 ) , on dbeiscsaeteftr?301 future? the are insects Edible 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 n the and fi ed fi t .vnHi eiwdteltrtr n rt the wrote and literature the reviewed Huis manuscript. van A. None. None. draft the on comments helpful manuscript. provided Eveleens Kees potential. needed its is realise effort to of partner lot public a and and private stage by we preliminary worldwide, a topic at this still in are interest recent the Despite sec- food tor. and agricultural new a become well may This tion. science. gastronomic and neuro- sciences cognitive human between science, collaboration close a requiring , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at .YnA 20)Iscsadohrivrert od fthe of foods invertebrate other and Insects (2005) AL Yen 9. .MyrRco B&CagiaS(97 sso net as insects of Uses (1997) S Changkija & VB Meyer-Rochow 8. .CsaNt M(05 nhooetmpayi Latin in Anthropo-entomophagy (2015) EM Costa-Neto 7. .RmsEodyJ&Mrn M (1989) JMP Moreno & J Ramos-Elorduy 6. .Yon-reJ&VwtaihK(05 dbeiscsi the in insects Edible (2005) K Viwatpanich & J Yhoung-Aree Paci Asia 5. the in feed and food as Insects (2015) AL Yen 4. (1951) FS Bodenheimer 1. .VnHi 20)Iscsa odi u-aaa Africa. sub-Saharan in food as Insects (2003) A Huis Van re- food 3. a as insects of use human The (2012) G DeFoliart 2. net aealto oeta nfo n edproduc- feed and food in potential of lot a have Insects aphr:SinePbihr,Inc. Publishers, Science Hampshire: iiietc:Ptnilo net,Rdns rg and Frogs Rodents, Insects, of Snails In Potential Minilivestock: aborigines. Australian ua odi au e una utai and Australia Guinea, cau- New and considerations conclusions. Papua tious cross-cultural in India: North-East food human mrc:a vriwo h motneo dbeinsects edible of importance communities. the local of to overview an America: oetbe ne éioatgo(sui etnoentomoló- (estudio antiguo México gico) el en comestibles En rg,adSnails Rodents, Insects, and of Potential Frogs, Minilivestock: of Implications In Vietnam. and Thailand, Myanmar, PDR, Laos odFeed directions. Food future and perspectives current region: Appl Sci Insect http://www. progress. in account food-insects.com/ bibliographic a source: Man Publishers. of Ecology the of fi l,NwHmsie cec ulses Inc. Publishers, Science Hampshire: New eld, p 0.ATEio,México. Editor, AGT 108. pp. , p 367 pp. , 1 ,33 – 23 – Con 8 Poet G dtr.En editor]. MG, [Paoletti 388 Acknowledgements 55. iaca Support Financial 163 , clFo Nutr Food Ecol p 415 pp. , fl Authorship References cso Interest of icts p 5.TeHge r .Junk, W. Dr. Hague: The 352. pp. , net odFeed Food Insects J – net sHmnFo:AChapter A Food: Human as Insects 185. – clgclIpiain of Implications Ecological 4.[altiM,editor] MG, [Paoletti 440. 36 159 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms – 1 185. ,17 o insectos Los – fi Ecological 23. l,New eld, .Insects J. fi c . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 302 0 oe E&VuhnM(06 h cnmcvleof value economic The (2006) M Vaughan & JE Losey 20. 9 a etrnJ 20)Eoytmsrie obiological to services Ecosystem (2006) JC Lenteren Van 19. T Wassenaar P, Gerber H, Steinfeld 14. 3 ulnaeB enn 21)Ssanbedesadbio- and diets Sustainable (2012) S Dernini B, or Burlingame knowledge 23. traditional insects: Edible (2009) AL atti- western Yen the 22. why food: as Insects (1999) GR DeFoliart 21. 5 a usA(03 oeta fiscsa odadfe in feed and food as insects of Potential (2013) A Huis Van 15. 3 imnD&CakM(04 lbldesln environmen- link diets Global (2014) M Clark & D Tilman 13. new The (2012) P Bhandary & S Tokgoz MW, Rosegrant 12. to- agriculture World (2012) J Bruinsma & N Alexandratos 11. world. the of species insect edible of List (2015) Y Jongema 10. 4 ebrP,SenedH edro B Henderson H, Steinfeld PJ, Gerber 24. 8 aitnA,Bse ,BneKK Benke Y, Basset AJ, Hamilton 18. (1957) TW Kirkpatrick 16. 7 oyH uklF odJ 21)Hwte hl we shall then How (2014) JR Wood & FV Dunkel H, Looy 17. 5 esnAW owa F ebre PSC Heuberger AF, Bouwman AHW, Beusen 25. 8 eeu ,WreisS&JhnsnD 21)The (2014) DA Johansson & S Wirsenius F, Hedenus 28. agree- Cancun the 1/CP16: Decision (2010) UNFCCC 27. 6 ilrM,LeM,TrtnJF Tarlton MR, Lee MC, Eisler 26. clgclsrie rvddb insects. by provided services ecological oto fpss h r hyignored? they are why Meet pests: Soc Entomol of control Livestock CdH. ypsu nBoiest n utial it United Diets Sustainable Hunger and Against Biodiversity on Symposium and In research policy, for action. solutions and Directions diversity. insects abroad.). edible and the Korea on in Trends Issue: (Special phobia? western important. is tude 311 suigfo security. food assuring Nations. United the of Organization Options pce richness. arthropod tropical species of estimation in uncertainty Quantifying health. human and security. sustainability tal food for implications 12-03. demand Econ its and Agric supply and No agricultural global relation tighter Paper A normal? Nations. Working United the and of Food Organization ESA Division Agriculture Economics Development Perspective Team Agricultural Global Revision. 2012 Studies The 2030/2050: wards http://wwwentwurnl/UK/Edible at +insects/Worldwide+species+list/. available Wageningen University; Entomology, of Laboratory Netherlands: The Headquarters. u Values foodways. Hum sustainable and attitudes Insect-eating eat? Ltd. Sons and Clowes William n giutr raiaino h ntdNations United the of Organization (FAO). Opportunities Agriculture Mitigation and and Emissions of Livestock Through Change Climate in rmgoa giutrlpouto systems. production agricultural Environ emis- global ammonia from global sions of estimates uncertainty Bottom-up etn tign lmt hnetargets. for consumption change dairy climate 124 and stringent meat meeting reduced of importance Climate FCCC/CP/ on document UNFCCC Convention Convention 2010/7/Add1. (UNFCCC). the Framework under Change Nations action cooperative United the of long-term work on the of outcome ments: tp ossanbelivestock. sustainable to steps https://www.cambridge.org/core – ,79 323. – p 1.Rm,Iay odadAgriculture and Food Italy: Rome, 319. pp. , 42 91. 6067 , 95 rceig fteItrainlScienti International the of Proceedings 31 303 , 131 , ’ ogSao.EvrnetlIse and Issues Environmental Shadow. Long s ,3 mNat Am – 6077. nuRvEntomol Rev Annu – 17 – 309. – 141. 103 , oebr21,Rm:FAO Rome: 2010, November 5 nuRvEntomol Rev Annu netLf nteTropics the in Life Insect noo Res Entomol . 176 Open University Library – 111. ,90 Nature – tal et 95. – dhoc ad Nature tal et 39 tal et lblAssessment Global A 507 21)Agriculture: (2014) . 44 289 , ,21 ,32 eios (2006) (editors) . (2013) . 58 BioScience oe Food Rome: . okn group working , on tal et – 515 – lmChange Clim – 563 , 50. 298. 34. tal et 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 rcNeth Proc 518 , London: . (2010) . Tackling – (2008) . 583. Atmos mJ Am – Agric 522. .vnHuis van A. 56 fi c , , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at 7 ao-lru (1998) J Ramos-Elorduy 47. 6 a usA&Vnom 21)Cneec report: Conference (2014) P Vantomme & A Huis Van 46. (2009) D Gracer & FV Dunkel G, DeFoliart 45. 4 otV (1995) VM Holt 44. 3 a tebekJ&VnHi 21)Evrnetlma- Environmental (2012) A Huis Van (2015) & J Itterbeeck P Van 43. Makoni & DZ Moyo E, Mufandaedza in 42. insects edible Threatened (2006) J Ramos-Elorduy 41. and pesticides as declines harvesting Wild CLR. Payne 40. 9 ufrF,Geeh A alPL Gall AA, Gnetegha FJ, Muafor 39. 8 zrfsC&WtosiE 21)Cuctm:sub- Crunchtime: (2015) EF Witkowski & C Dzerefos worms. 38. mopane in value big The (1994) CV Styles 37. (2006) J Ghazoul 36. 5 ukn G 19)Tentiinlvleo edible of value nutritional The (1997) SGF Bukkens 35. 4 adinnrsn eebu R(05 Edible (2015) MR Berenbaum & M Randrianandrasana 34. 1 oic GB&d orD 21)Environmental (2012) DM Boer de & DGAB Oonincx 31. MJW Heetkamp J, der Itterbeeck Van DGAB, Van Oonincx 30. & MY Noordam M, Spiegel der Van 29. 3 a usA a tebekJ lne H Klunder J, Itterbeeck Van A, the Huis Reducing Van (2015) 33. SA Abbasi & T Abbasi T, Abbasi 32. ore ud oEil Insects Edible Press. Street Park to Vermont: Guide Gourmet 1.Sl aeCt,U,UA adakGlobal Aardvark World. the USA: feed to UT, insects City, Lake Culture Changing Publishing. Salt a of 414. Chronicle Newsletter: Insects 1993. July/August Oxford Meeuws, H Daniel Thornton iuainfreil netpoueet itrclper- historical a procurement: insect spective. edible for nipulation Zimbabwe. 10 of harvesting: Lowveld products ( South-Eastern governing forest regulations and non-timber rules of Management them. preserve to 1746-4269-2-51 measures Ethnomed some Ethnobiol J and Mexico Hidalgo, in insects of 57 Japan. consumption rural and collection contemporary the rise: imports Research Indonesia. Forestry Bogor, in 178, grubs International Paper weevil Working for (CIFOR), palm of Center farming Cameroon. and trade Exploitation, 919 aaa tnbg,adysao eiayadcash and delicacy communities. season rural dry impoverished for a cow stinkbugs, Saharan Resource and Weekly Livelihoods Rural Report Technical Final Sustainability. Enhancing Worm: insects. o-rsaenatrpd nrrlcmuiisof communities rural in Feed Madagascar. arthropods and non-crustacean Nations. Food United the for of Organization Agriculture Prospects and Future Security Insects: Edible mato h rdcino elom saprotein a as mealworms of humans production for the source of impact human or ammonia animal and for suitable gas consumption. species greenhouse insect by on production exploration An food (2010) in application their 12 for production. sources feed aspects protein and rapeseed) legislative and novel duckweed, of and seaweed, Safety microalgae, (2013) (insects, HJ Fels-Klerx lblevrnetlipc flvsokpouto:the production: livestock option. of minilivestock impact environmental global 7 e51145. , 1521 , – 662 , 65. – 925. – clFo Nutr Food Ecol A oetyPpr11 p 8.Rm:Food Rome: 187. pp. 171, Paper Forestry FAO . 22 – 678. tnbo Ethnomed Ethnobiol J ’ 1530. .Tx ee rmteoiia 85eiinby edition 1885 original the from reset Text s. ,20 Ethnobiol J – LsONE PLos 22. h o a Insects? Eat Not Why — oaiWolnsadteMopane the and Woodlands Mopani iecceassessment. cycle life a lae Prod Cleaner J 2 op e odSiFo Safety Food Sci Food Rev Compr 1(niejunl.di 10.1186/ doi: journal). (online 51 , 36 35 5 287 , odChain Food e14445. , 354 , reyCal usn:the Cuisine: Crawly Creepy net odFeed Food Insects J – 8 319. mrsabelina Imbrasia – ,1 383. p10 Rochester, 150. pp , – 7. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms odn DFID. London: . 112 4 184 , p 7 Oxford: 67. pp. , f gi Res Agric J Afr 1754 , tal et – odSec Food tal et 192. LSONE PLoS – cesin access ) 1766. h Food The (2015) . Farmer (2013) . 2015; tal et pp. , 1 7 ’ s , , . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 9 igK aaui ,Wlo J Wilson M, Kamarudin K, Sing 59. 4 aemA gneiJ 21)Got performance Growth (2012) JB Ogunremi & AO Kareem 64. 8 gni ,KosW it M, Wirth W, Kloas J, Ogunjil 58. 7 wny A,Aeo A&An M(03 Performance (2003) JM Aina & VA Aletor TAM, Awoniyi 57. 3 neoA,Eod S&Oe J(09 elcmn of Replacement (2009) OJ Owen & ES Erondu AO, Aniebo 63. 6 lou 20)Ugaigtentiievleo full-fat of value nutritive the Upgrading (2000) J Oluokun 56. 2 A (2014) FAO 52. (2011) FAO 51. 5 áce-uo J eHr ,Sn A Sanz C, Haro de MJ, Sánchez-Muros 55. larvae Insect (2015) R Waagbø & T Arsiwalla ER, Lock 54. M Batka M, Kobayashi S, Msangi 53. 2 auC fdk B 20)Got n uvvlof survival and Growth (2003) EBC Ufodike & CT Madu 62. re- The (2003) AG Oyediran & AAS Amusan AB, Idowu 61. 0 AF/H (2014) FASFC/SHC 50. tier- Lebensmittel über EDI des Verordnung (2015) EDI 49. 8 a usA upH ik (2014) M Dicke & HV Gurp A, Huis Van 48. 0 bne N,OymniA,NoaCC Nwoga AE, Onyimonyi FNH, Mbunwen 60. fblow of Tropentag Deutscher Development 11 Stuttgart-Hohenheim, for Research In of substitute diets. emerging tilapia an (magmeal): meal got nio susAgric Issues Environ J of n ol Sci of Poult place J in meal Int maggot on fed broiler-chickens of tjas/article/view/49768). Sci Anim elra ndea aae ar fiao( Africano bagre el para nus dietas en larvas de iepinus rBaksoldier Black or fi oaen elfrbolrpouto iheither with production broiler for meal soyabeans Nutr agta novninldiets. unconventional as maggot House containing diet the assadPrevention the and Causes by Brussels: validated 9160) Chain no 2014/04) Food dossier FASFC. the (SHC; dossier Council of Health Com Safety Superior the Sci for Agency (FASFC; Federal the of usiuefrtlpa( tilapia for substitute of evaluation of Nutritional diet the version). in print of nutrients ahead of (Epublication ( source salmon alternative Atlantic an as meal World Aquaculture. and 83177-GLB No Bank. Fisheries Report for Bank Prospects 2030: (FAO). Nations United the of Organization Challenges and Opportunities Cookbook cat (L). of sponse spp.). neddfrHmnConsumption Human for Intended und Lebensmittel- http://tinyurlcom/ojryfut. Eidgenössische der (EDI). 14 Innern 5 a, des und Das Departement Buchstabe 4 4 Absätze Absatz 35 Gebrauchsgegenständeverordnung und 10 1 9, Absatz Artikel Herkunft ischer ilgclvleo agtma sarpaeetfor replacement a as meal maggot of fi value Biological ( tilapia 34 red juvenile farmed for replacement sustainable fective, hma ihmgo eli fia cat African in meal maggot with meal sh heli h it fArcngatsal( snail giant African of diets the in shmeal 288 , lra gariepinus Clarias fi https://www.cambridge.org/core )). h( sh ie nmProd Anim J Niger Eulcto ha fpitversion). print of ahead (Epublication eit Cientí Revista acig ieSci Life J Hatchings it Ssiuind aiad ecd o harina con pescado de harina de (Sustitución diets ) – fl lra anguillaris Clarias 292. y( e ok oubaUiest Press. University Columbia York: New . lra gariepinus Clarias 3 hyoy megacephala Chrysomya h tt fWrdFseisadAquaculture: and Fisheries World of State The lblFo ossadFo Waste Food and Losses Food Global aalbea http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ at (available 2 fl 271 , ofrneo nentoa Agricultural International on Conference avema ( meal larvae y am salar Salmo fi e opuddrtosadmaggots. and rations compounded fed aUOAgrícola UDO ca – rohoi niloticus Oreochromis oe FAO. Rome: . 274. 4 odSft set fInsects of Aspects Safety Food ,1 30 – eeromolitor Tenebrio 3Otbr2006. October 13 ueie e ietlpaand tilapia live fed juveniles ) 139 , – fl . 5 5. Open University Library agt( maggot y oe odadAgriculture and Food Rome: . 821 , Oreochromis fi postsmolt. ) grig Brhl 82 to 1822) (Burchell ngerlings ahntn C World DC: Washington, . tal et – emtaillucens Hermetia 144. qa Sci Aquat J – tal et 825. Scienti . agtma sa ef- an as meal maggot ) 20)House (2006) . fi heli h itof diet the in shmeal tal et 21) Evaluation (2014). . 9 uc domestica Musca 653 , fi elas meal (2013) . sp.). diet. ) h( sh lra gariepi- Clarias qautNutr Aquacult fi Committee c tal et , on 18 – tal et lra gar- Clarias 656. dbeiscsaeteftr?303 future? the are insects Edible fi h Insect The a e J Vet Pak ,47 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 helin shmeal — ). fi Aquacult Achatina fl (2015) . fi fi (2011) . shmeal. ie J Niger Extent, ihto Fish mag- y shmeal shmeal – 52. 2006 ) . 6 aai A aou M&AaiO 20)Evaluation (2003) OO Ajayi & AM Balogun EA, Fasakin 66. 5 ubnvA,MlseaR,RsioaSS Rashidova RY, Milusheva AR, Kurbanov 65. 0 koK ngid O(05 urtoa oetasof potentials Nutritional (2005) AO Onigbinde & KE Ekpo 80. 7 gW,Le L n LP Ang FL, Liew WK, Ng 67. 8 tHlieS hpadC obri JK Tomberlin C, Sheppard S, St-Hilaire 68. 9 elyW,GyodT,BrosFT Barrows TG, Gaylord WM, Sealey 69. 9 iL aeodCM ai LMC Sagis CMM, Lakemond L, Yi 79. compos- Nutritional (2013) OK Schlüter & BA Rumpold 78. 6 ud E&Prel P(05 rcesaentafree a not are Crickets (2015) MP Parrella & ME Lundy 76. A Huis Van DGAB, Oonincx S, Broekhoven Van 75. AR Hernandez EA, Gonzalez J, Ramos-Elorduy 74. 3 aarsMgd ,AaiT iu C Nieus T, Alabi R, Megido Caparros 73. 2 us B&HnonogY(05 ml-cl production Small-scale (2015) Y Hanboonsong & PB Durst 72. de appliquée Ecologie (2015) JC Lokela Monzenga 71. (2013) PB Durst & T Jamjanya Y, Hanboonsong 70. 7 ik D&OnnxD(04 hpe 17 Chapter (2014) D Oonincx & MD Finke 77. , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at fi mori feto elcmn of replacement of Effect xrcinadcaatrsto fpoenfatosfrom fractions protein of fi characterisation and Extraction h av of larva the om( worm 733 rppea edtf o ano trout, Rainbow for feedstuff mykiss a as prepupae cat African for Res Aquacult diets practical esr nlsso ano trout, Rainbow of analysis Sensory to n aeyapcso dbeinsects. edible of aspects Res safety and ition Press. Academic Diego: San uc:poencpuefo clbeogncside-streams of ONE organic populations scalable high-density from via capture protein lunch: on 2014.12.005. 10.1016/j.jinsphys. doi: Tenebrionidae) version). by-products.(online organic (Coleoptera: of composed species diets mealworm edible ef conversion feed and performance Growth chickens. broiler for feed Entomol as Econ and wastes organic recycle to of Use (2002) ffl-a n eatdmgo el ntefeigo clar- of feeding the in cat meals iid maggot defatted and full-fat of iepoenrc ua odsuc nRatanakiri in source food human alterna- Cambodia. an Province, as protein-rich by-products local with tive crickets produc- edible small-scale of residential tion and cheap a of Optimisation od:eprec rmTaln n a People Lao and Thailand from liveli- rural experience and security food hoods: enhanced de for insects edible of Catholique Institute. Université Life and Research Earth Biodiversity Centre, 2015 ingénierie bioingénieurs, des et Faculté agronomiques Louvain, février l sciences de en biologique, vue docteur en de Lokela grade conditions Monzenga des Claude Jean optimisation et d phénologie : Coleoptera) phoenicis Rhynchophorus Of Regional Paci the Nations, and United and Asia the Collection of Farming, Organization Thailand Insect in Marketing Edible Livestock: legged Soc Aquacult World J soldier Black enriched fed odfriscioe.In insectivores. Organisms for food eortcRepublic. Democratic ngerling. eisc species. insect ve ’ lvg iagn,RDCno hs rsné par présentée Thèse R.D.Congo. Kisangani, à élevage – 57 uapoeno h rwhof growth the on protein pupa ) 738. 10 fi . 802 , eeromolitor Tenebrio sh ol qautSoc Aquacult World J e0118785. , p 583 pp. , lra gariepinus Clarias n ihAutStud Aquat Fish J Int – hnhpou phoenicis Rhynchophorus 823. eeromolitor Tenebrio 32 95 up.1 273 1, Suppl. , 214 , fi odChem Food – c. 1 SaioIa A-GI editor]. JAM-RGRI, [Shapiro-Ilan 616 c odAgric Food Sci J – net odFeed Food Insects J 42 ago:Fo n Agriculture and Food Bangkok: . 220. sa lentv rti orein source protein alternative an as ) fi ,34 hma ihslwr ( silkworm with meal sh fl asPouto fBene of Production Mass arcu Dyptoia : (Dryophthoridae Fabricius tal et prepupae, y – fi 45. Clotr:Tenebrionidae) (Coleoptera: ngerlings. 38 141 – 280. 20)Ptnilo meal- of Potential (2001) . ceadomesticus Acheta 2 ,59 fi ,25 3341 , sh, (F). nohnhsmykiss Oncorhynchus – – 67. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms lra gariepinus Clarias 27. 96 netPhysiol Insect J lra gariepinus Clarias – a Nutr J Pak emtaillucens Hermetia qautRes Aquacult 3348. 627 , tal et o urFood Nutr Mol fi 1 tal et inyo three of ciency ,25 Oncorhynchus ’ tal et tal et beto du obtention — 20)Fly (2007) . tal et – tal et 632. – net as insects 31. (2013) . (2011) . (2016) . Bombyx (2015) . . fi (2015) . 4 efor ce PLoS tal et ,287. fi Six- cial 34 73 ’ J s , . . , . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 304 9 onYI hn Y wn -,HnMS Han J-S, Hwang MY, Chung Y-I, Yoon 89. AB Kanangila MK, Mbayo EM, Kalonda 88. S Gupta SI, Hay FB, Piel 87. 6 kuJ,TuhB honC Chhoun B, Touch JK, Skau 86. 2 isnR 21)Deayidcdzn de zinc Dietary-induced (2015) RS Gibson 82. DeFoliart Gene food; human as Insect (1992) G DeFoliart 81. 5 asra ,LknaaA aoJ Gado A, Lokangaka M, Bauserman 85. 7 egoo ,DgieJP&Aeln - 19)Les (1996) H-P Aberlenc & J-P Deguine C, Seignobos 97. proper- Pharmacological (2015). OA Idowu & AB Idowu 96. 1 iyr N ej M jrg SM Njoroge GM, Kenji JN, Kinyuru 91. 0 saoaN,Kvlo M atao AI Bastrakov VM, Kovalzon NA, Ushakova 90. 3 cenE oselM giI Egli M, Cogswell E, McLean 83. 4 hitne L rc O ugiMN Mungai FO, Orech DL, Christensen 84. 4 zrfsC,WtosiEF&Tm (2013) A Abdulhamid M, R Haruna I, Sani Toms 95. & ETF Witkowski CM, Dzerefos 94. 3 wn - hiSK(05 ult hrceitc of characteristics Quality (2015) S-K Choi & S-Y Hwang 93. 2 gia-iad D oe G sail-atn C Escamilla-Santana MG, Lopez ED, Aguilar-Miranda 92. ligbsdo eorpis xesmraiy n inter- and mortality, excess ventions. demographics, on based elling eitnet bst nmc e ihftdiet. high-fat a fed mice in 7 obesity to resistance dichotoma Allomyrina Congo. the of Sci Republic Life extracts Med Democratic insect Adv in some Katanga of activity from antisickling of Evaluation ikecl nei ncide under children in anaemia cell sickle n iergot:arnoie ra nCambodia. in trial Nutr randomized status, Clin a iron J growth: composition, body linear on and products forti food micronutrient mentary and food source anaemia. mal and stunting prevent comple- Nutr sustainable to Health and food available locally mentary a as ef cereal the pillar determining trial cluster-randomized ike etr tPru University. Purdue Avanelle The at solutions Lecture and Kirksey challenges countries: income aspects. 11 economic and nutritional some discusses el td oaiu appliquée. d botanique de Journal et In: nelle insectes. leurs et Mofus of secretion 6. repellent 2015, Prygomorphidae). the (Orthoptera: of ties rcsigmtoso the on methods processing mouse of development the block to parkinsonism. sorbent plant on lized of ability The rvlneo nei,WOVtmnadMineral and Vitamin 1993 WHO Nutr System, anaemia, Information Nutrition of prevalence 49 noohg mn h uso ey:aptnilmin- potential a Kenya: source? of eral Luos the among Entomophagy fntiinlqaiyadmnrlcmoiino re ed- Technol dried of composition mineral ible and quality nutritional of in considera- management stinkbugs sustainable edible tions. and Africa of southern ethnoentomology Comparative uiayRes Culinary J muf Chem ground Food with mented tal et Technol Bioprocess ( termite hylanus winged edible of content vitamin 1978 , https://www.cambridge.org/core 395 , – 55. fi 20)Caatrsiso maize of Characteristics (2002) . ooeu variegatus Zonocerus scnann elom( Mealworm containing ns 12 tnbo Ethnomed Ethnobiol J – – n rshpe ( grasshopper and ) 444 , 399. 1991. 2 LSMed PLoS ,1 50 101 – n odSiNutr Sci Food J Int – 18 6. 454. lhtbu diaperinus Alphitobius 192 , olBohmBiophys Biochem Dokl 1785 , 21 742 , 104 , 3 – 3 SN 2348-294X. ISSN: . 195. – 778 , – 10 751. 1792. Atrpd:Isca aveconfer larvae Insecta) (Arthropoda: eeromolitor Tenebrio – e1001484. , 115. . – Open University Library 782. nvitro in tal et (grasshopper). 9 20. , upladifferens Ruspolia tal et Ethnozoologie 21)Goa udnof burden Global (2013) . eeromolitor Tenebrio 57 tal et tal et rti ietblt and digestibility protein 198 , 21)Efcso ani- of Effects (2015) . ooeae immobi- homogenates fi ooeu variegatus Zonocerus – ’ giutr tradition- agriculture tal et e 2010 ve, 2005. 461 fl 20)Worldwide (2009) . 21)Assessment (2014) . u otlasupple- tortilla our fi – artre sub- Macrotermes aini comple- in cation larvae. 203. ,94 21)Efc of Effect (2010) . urToday Nutr tal et fi fi , on odDairy Food J ulcHealth Public ayo cater- of cacy inyi low in ciency – tal et tal et 38 – tal et tal et 97. 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 21)A (2015) . 00 mod- 2050: 125 , rpProt Crop ). .Agric. J. Nutrients ). (2006) . (2015) . (2015) . (2015) . Korean Public – Food 187. Am .vnHuis van A. 50 J , , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at 1.Aik A raoV&Nabg A(00 Processed (2010) IA Nyambuga & V Oriamo MA, Ayieko 116. 1.FshrAH&Fee J(09 osmrfamiliarity Consumer (2009) LJ Frewer & ARH Fischer 115. 1.Lnvl J tebkesLA(04 xlrn con- Exploring (2014) LPA Steenbekkers & EJS Lensvelt 114. P Tinchan ARH, Fischer HSG, Tan 113. 0.RmsayS 21)Stigtetbefrahotter, a for table the Setting (2015) SB Ramaswamy 108. proteins Insect (2015) A Stamer 107. M Maggioletti C, Losasso S, Belluco 106. 0.PnrM 21)Alryt out n cii grasshop- acridid and locusts to Allergy (2014) MP Pener 105. 0.Piiagu ,Sirc ,SiospC Srisomsap C, Srinroch P, Phiriyangkul 104. 0.VrocxKM a rehvnS e Hartog-Jager den S, Broekhoven Van KCM, Verhoeckx 103. 1.VreeW(05 Pro (2015) W Verbeke 112. 1.RznP ulo ,FnhrK Fincher L, Guillot P, Rozin 111. 0.Sirc ,SiospC hkhihmaktD Chokchaichamnankit C, Srisomsap C, Srinroch 102. 1.Rb B oi hnC(05 eemnnsof Determinants (2015) C Chan & P Rozin MB, Ruby 110. Paper Working (2014) D Satterthwaite & G Mcgranahan 109. 0.PniiE(05 l nte(igr aiyrvsdarthro- revised family (bigger) the in All (2015) E Pennisi 101. JM Korpela J, Wolkers-Rooijackers HC, Klunder 100. (2015). G Gurnari 99. 8 uuuF,KiiR lrc ymiCW Nyambi Clarice R, Kwiri FM, Mujuru 98. n mrigConcerns Publishing. International Emerging and ne ifrn rdtoa rcie nGwanda, in practices traditional different Zimbabwe. under of quality Microbiological ohg o odscrt ihnteLk itrare- Victoria Lake the within lake security gion. and food for termites mophagy of products odQa Preference Qual Food ihfosadtepreto frssadbene and risks of perception the and foods with eti utai n h Netherlands. the experi- and and 53 Australia survey in a entomophagy: ment of acceptance sumer acceptance.42 of determinants experi- individual as and ence exposure cultural exploring food: as fl review. a pers: 23 ( proteins locust allergenicity Bombay on in processing thermal food of Effect CF dp net sama usiuei etr society. Western a in substitute Preference meat Qual a Food as insects adopt feed. a perspective: nutritional and 296 safety review. food critical a in insects ca legcptet a ec ofo containing food to react proteins. 364 may mealworm patients Yellow allergic acean 160 with insect, n te xmlso einmasochism. benign of Making examples other and 21)Identi (2015) Environ ilnns oetiscsi h S n India. and USA the in insects Feed Food eat and Insects to Environment willingness for Institute Working Development. London: International Trends. Paper and Concepts Urbanisation o remriscutca n insect and crustacean marries tree pod storage and insects. edible processing of of aspects Microbiological (2012) net odFeed Food Insects te,mr rwe at:iscso h menu? the on insects earth: crowded more atter, 543 , ,78 – 28. – – – tal et 313. 373. 166. MORep EMBO f odArcNt Dev Nutr Agric Food J Afr Macrobrachium – – 89. 347 561. 8 rlu bimaculatus Gryllus 21)Hueds ie(e 0 n crust- and 10) p (Der mite dust House (2014) . 439 , n urMcoilAp Sci Appl Microbiol Curr J Int 220 , fi – rhpeaRes Orthoptera J 447. aino oe legni edible in allergen novel of cation op e odSiFo Safety Food Sci Food Rev Compr – odControl Food . 221. 1 1 aeyPooosi h odIndustry Food the in Protocols Safety 16 aag succincta Patanga 215 , 171 , 676 , 20 39 fi p.allergens. spp. igcnueswoaerayto ready are who consumers ling – – 576 , 147 , G wteln:Springer Switzerland: AG, . 225. 178. – oibai belina Gonimbrasia 680. – – tal et 585. 155. odCe Toxicol Chem Food 26 — n t cross-reactivity its and 23 628 , e orefranimal for source new a 10 fl 21)Ga ob sad, be to Glad (2013) . ,59 e:ipoigento- improving ies: odQa Preference Qual Food 2085 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ). tal et tal et – – n odEng Food J Int odChem Food 631. 67. fi clFo Nutr Food Ecol 3 21)Insects (2015) . – elds. 21)Edible (2013) . 1085 , 2098. tal et tal et ugDecis Judg processed c Total Sci – (2015) . (2014) . 1094. tal et tal et 184 fi 12 65 ts. 1 J J , , , , . . . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000069 Downloaded from Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2.MgitaP,LoF,RbriM&MsaiS(2015) S Massari & M Ruberti FD, Leo PP, Miglietta 121. 1.Cpro eioR alnL eesM Geuens L, Sablon R, Megido Caparros 117. 2.NwkV esj ,RteshbrD Rittenschober D, Persijn V, Nowak 120. (1997). F Malaisse 119. insectivore The (2015) C Spence & B Reade O, Deroy 118. elom o od ae otrn perspective. footprint water a food: Water for Mealworms o noohg development. attitude entomophagy promising for consumers: Belgian by acceptance insects ffo opsto aafreil insects. edible for data 193 composition food Nutritionnelle of Gembloux. et de Agronomiques Presses Écologique Gembloux:Les it. Approche of out West the take to Preference how and lemma, https://www.cambridge.org/core ,39 , – 7 46. 6190 , 44 ,44 – 6203. – 55. eNui nFrtCar Africaine: Claire Forêt en Nourir Se . Open University Library JSensStud tal et tal et 21)Review (2014) . 29 21)Edible (2014) . p 384. pp. , , on ,14 odChem Food dbeiscsaeteftr?305 future? the are insects Edible odQual Food 28 Jan2020 at10:08:09 – 20. ’ di- s 2.JnsR 21)Saede:diymawr ( mealworm daily diet: Space (2015) RS Jones 125. L Tong L, Tang Y, Yang 124. 2.Tn ,Y i 21)Isc odfrastronauts: for food Insect (2011) H Liu & X Yu L, Tong M 123. Takaoki Y, Ishikawa N, Katayama 122. , subjectto theCambridgeCore termsofuse,available at jist/index.php/JIST/article/view/108/64. Top Sci Interdiscip molitor space. in humans for 43 protein of source a as noohg:akyt pc agriculture. space to key Res a Entomophagy: n h urtoa au fteeiscsfrhmncon- space human for lettuce 101 deep insects and these during mulberry of sumption on value nutritional fed the silkworms and in exchange gas 1236 , 613 , 41 701 , avs namlieeainlspaceship. multigenerational a on harvest ) – – 1242. 622. – 705. vial thttps://physics.le.ac.uk/ at Available . tal et 20)Slwrsculture Silkworms (2009) . fl ights. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms ulEtmlRes Entomol Bull d pc Res Space Adv tal et d Space Adv Tenebrio (2008) . J .