DOCSLIB.ORG

****1************************************* * Reproductions Supplied by EDFS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
****1************************************* * Reproductions Supplied by EDFS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document DOCUMENT RESUME ED 304 539 CE 052 052 AUTHOR Alamprese, Judith A.; And Others TITLE Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS): Impact of the First Year's Task Forces. Final Report. INSTITUTION COSMOS Corp., Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-942570-33-2 PUB DATE Dec 87 NOTE 193p. AVAILABLE FROMCOSMOS Corporation, 1735 Eye Street, NW, Suite 613, Washington, DC 20006 ($9.50). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; Commercial Television; Community Involvement; Community Programs; *Cooperative Programs; Coordination; *Illiteracy; *Literacy Education; *Outreach Programs; *Public Service; Public Television; Student Recruitment IDENTIFIERS *Project Literacy U S ABSTRACT This report details an evaluation of the effects of outreach activities of Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS) on community responses to the illiteracy problem. Part A describes general findings regarding PLUS task force activities during the campaign's first year, December 1985-June 1987. Section I is an introduction; Section II describes activities that precede' the PLUS campaign, strategies that ABC and PBS used to develop the campaign, and simultaneous national literacy activities. Section III presents the conceptual approach and data collection methods. Section IV discusses development and functioning of task forces as mechanisms for coalescing support to combat illiteracy. Sections V-VII describe activities task forces performed to accomplish the three PLUS goals--awareness raising, community collaboration, and recruitment of volunteers and adult learners. Section VIII assesses lessons learned and presents recommendations for policy and practice. Part B presents five case studies of PLUS task forces, which illustrate the strategies used in supporting the PLUS campaign. Each description covers task force development; relatr.d literacy efforts; task force organization and operation; awareness-raising activities; community participation; volunteer and adult learner recruitment; and impact on service provision. The five task forces are Beaufort County, South Carolina, St. Louis, Missouri, Los Angeles, California, Maine, and Oregon. (YLB) *********************************1************************************* * Reproductions supplied by EDFS are the best that can be made * from the original document. ***************************%******************************************* I L:r3 Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS): asN Impact of the First Year's Li' Task Forces Judith A. Alamprese Rhonda Leach Schaff U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Nancy Brigham E 'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THI 3 4, ,a uewar erN, EC A,t()NAL PE MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTEDdY F NTERRI( r-,510, ,,,e5` ,we'rer,,,Xiu. PO as I.\ A -N '^e sc ,,rgan 711' ".7 \.1 1 Ewer, rape, r, Ploot10,11,r December 1987 0 CD, rj, ni,i ,5a,-pssa, ' 1'0 THE EDUCATIONALRESOURCES 5,1,, INFORMATION CENTER {EPIC1 Final Report Prepared for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Under CPB Account No. 1709/80636 COSMOS CORPORATION COSMOS CORPORATION COSMOS Corporation was founded in 1980. The firm offers research, Software development, and other consulting services to government, founiation, and business clients. COSMOS is distinct among firms offering similar services in that its research, software development, and consulting activities augment each other, thereby increasing the quality of the services provided. COSMOS's research adheres to the highest standards of peer review and academic publication, and its staff frequently publishes in the recognized professional and academic journals. COSMOS's software development and consulting services are undertaken only for those topics for which COSMOS has conducted prior research or has otherwise developed an adequate knowledge base--so that the services reflect the most advanced and effec- tive state-of-the-art. COSMOS Corporation consists of two divisions: the Research and Consulting Division and the Information Systums Division. In turn, the Research and Consulting Division provides services through one of five institu- tes: the Case Study Institute, the Management & Tech- nology Institute, the Education & Training Institute, the Justice Institute, and the Allied Health Institute. Each institute concentrates on a different aspect of research, management, or technical assistance. This project is one of several within COSMOS's Education & Training Institute Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS): Impact of the First Year's Task Forces Judith A. Alamprese Rhonda Leach Schaff Nancy Brigham December 1987 Final Report Prepared for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Under CPB Account No. 1709/80636 COSMOS CORPORATION ISBN No. 0-942570-33-2 CCSMOS Production Assistants: Bernice Hughes The conduct of this study and the preparation of the final report were sponsored by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting under CPB Account No. 1709/80636. Anv opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. U iii PREFACE During its first year, Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS) stimu- lated the development of over 300 community task forces that worked to combat the illiteracy problem in this country. These local task forcesinvolving community members from education, media, social services, government, volunteer organizations, religious groups, and business and industry--provideda forum for the organization of activities in support of PLUS. As local efforts, the task forces built upon the momentum generated by the national media campaign, to raise awareness about illiteracy and to promote community involvement in solving the problem. In the development of the PLUS campaign, the task forces' work was considered critical to the success of PLUS. Thus, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) commissioned COSMOS Corporation to conduct a year-long evaluation of the effects of PLUS's outreach development activities on community responses to the illiteracy problem. Of particular concern were the success- ful strategies that were utilized by the task forces,as well as the barriers that they encountered in implementing their activities. This report presents the results of the evaluation, which was undertaken during PLUS's first year, 1986-1987. At the time the evaluation was initiated, the second year of PLUS had not yet been announced. This, the evaluation was undertaken with the assumption that the PLUS campaign would end in June 1987. The report contains two parts. The first describes the general findings from an assessment of the community task forces that were developed as part of the PLUS media campaign. The results of the activities undertaken by these task forces to meet the PLUS campaign goals are described, and recommendations are made for issues that warrant consideration as the PLUS campaign continues. Presented in the second part of the report are five case studies of PLUS task forces, which illustrate various strategies utilized by task forces in supporting the national campaign. During the course of the year-long evaluation, survey data were collected from 153 PLUS task forces, of the 308 task forces in operation as of December 1986. The task forces who responded to our survey were representative of'Aie universe of task rorces in existence at the time of the survey. Thirty of the 153 task forces were studied further through the conduct of telephone interviews, and five task forces were the subject of in-depth case studies. Therefore, the evaluation is based upon a wealth of information from a variety of PLUS task force efforts across the country. I) iv Our data collection activities would not have been possible without the cooperation and support of the task force conveners, who took tame from their hectic task force responsibilities to complete our survey. We are indebted to these individuals. Special thanks are given to the conveners who participated in the two phases of telephone interviews. Their insights about the PLUS campaign and the information they provided about their task forces' activities were critical to our evaluation results. Finally, our gratitude is expressed to the task force conveners who organized our five case study site visits, and to the community members whom we met with at the sites. Each of the conveners was most helpful in ideltifying appropriate individuals for the evaluation team to interview, and in sharing extensive information about their experiences organizing and implementing task force activities. At critical points throughout the evaluation, we benefited from the guidance of staff from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and from WQED in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dr. Mary E. Sceiford, our CPB project officer, provided advice on each of the evaluation's phases. We wish to acknowledge her support throughout the evaluation process. As well, we are grateful to Mr. Douglas Bodwell from CPB, for his perceptive insights on our evaluation :esults. Special thanks are extended to Margot Wuodwell from WQED, PLUS's national coordinator, who was instrumental in obtaining support for the conduct of the evaluation. Margot's thoughtful review of documents produced during the evaluation, as well as the assistance provided by Pat Honisek and Ricki Wertz from WQED, were invaluable to our effort. Finally, we wish to thank the coordinators of the Public Television Outreach Alliance for their time in providing information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qq Rr Sstt Utivvwwxxyyzz1234567890&/`Ea.$4(EV?( )[]
    Aa Bh CA- Dd EeFf Gg Flu Ii Jj Kk LI Mm No Oo Pp Qq Rr SsTt UtiVvWwXxYyZz1234567890&/`Ea.$4(EV?( )[] UPPER AND LOWER CASE.THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TYPOG PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONALTYPEFACE CORPORATION,VOI.UME SEVEN. NUMBER FOUR, DEC. 1980 5741 (1981) VOLUME SEVEN, NUMBER FOUR, DECEMBER. 1980 HERB Lt./SALIN, EDITORIAL Sr DESIGN DIRECTOR AARON BURNS. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR EDWARD RON DTHALER. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR EDWARD GOTTSCHALL. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR MARION MULLER. ASSOCIATE EDITOR JASON CALM. JUREK WAJDOWICZ, DESIGN IS PRODUCTION EDITORS MICHAEL ARON. CLAUDIA CLAY. TONY DISPIGNA. JOE FEIGENBAUM. ART AND PRODUCTION R HODA SPARSER. RESEARCH DIRECTOR JOHN PRENTKI, BUSINESS MANAGER NANCY PORTER. EDITORIAL TRAFFIC COORDINATOR HELENA WALLSCH LAG. ADVERTISING/PRODUCTION MANAGER 0 INTERNATIONAL TYPEFACE CORPORATION 1980 PUBLISHED FOUR TIMES A YEAR IN MARCH, JUNE, SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER BY INTERNATIONAL TYPEFACE CORPORATION 2 HAMMARSKJOLD PLAZA. NEW YORK. N.Y.10017 A JOINTLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF PHOTO-LETTERING. INC. AND LUBALIN. BURNS & CO., INC. CONTROLLED CIRCULATION POSTAGE PAID AT NEW YORK. N.Y. AND AT FARMINGDALE. N.Y. USTS PURL 073990 PUBLISHED IN U.S.A. ITC OFFICERS New career directions EDWARD RONDTHALER,CHAIRMAN AARON BURNS. PRESIDENT HERB LUSALIN, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT challenge everyone JOHN PRENTKI.VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL MANAGER BOB FARBER, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT ED BENGUIAT,VICE PRESIDENT STEPHEN KOPEC. VICE PRESIDENT involved with graphic U.S. SINGLE COPIES $1.50 ELSEWHERE. SINGLE COPIES 52.50 TO QUALIFY FOR FREE SUBSCRIPTION COMPLETE AND RETURN communications, THE SUBSCRIPTION FORM IN THIS ISSUE TO ITC OR WRITE TO THE ITC EXECUTIVE OFFICE. 2 HAMMARSKJOLD PLAZA. NEW YORK. N.Y. 10017 including students In this issue: and educators.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of Communications Workers of America the Newspaper Guild/CWA National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians/CWA
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review- ) MB Docket No. 09-192 Review of the Commission’s Broadcast ) Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted ) Pursuant to Section 202 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) RFQ for Media Ownership Studies ) MB Docket No. 09-182 ) Comments of Communications Workers of America The Newspaper Guild/CWA National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians/CWA Eric D. Geist 501 Third St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 434-1193 (phone) (202) 434-1201 (fax) [email protected] Dated: July 12, 2010 SUMMARY The Commission’s broadcast media ownership rules are based on the First Amendment principle that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to public welfare. As the Commission has repeatedly stated and as the Courts have consistently confirmed, common ownership of media reduces viewpoint diversity and competition. In 2004, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (“Third Circuit Court”) in Prometheus v FCC affirmed the authority of the Commission to regulate media ownership to foster viewpoint diversity, local identity, and prevent undue concentration of economic power. The Third Circuit Court acknowledged that structural rules limiting concentrated ownership of the media are necessary to protect and promote the free and vibrant press that is so vital to our democracy. The Commission adopted new language in 2008 that weakened the rules for limits on the newspaper/television ownership in the top 20 DMAs. It also provided an exception for the cross- media ownership ban for failed or failing properties that applies outside the top 20 DMAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Naval Force Control and the Red Naval C System: What the Blue Commander Needs to Know
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1989 Soviet Naval Force Control and the Red naval C system: what the Blue commander needs to know Tondu, Jennifer L. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/26259 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California 7 3-^35 SOVIET NAVAL FORCE CONTROL AND THE RED NAVAL C^ SYSTEM: WHAT THE BLUE COMMANDER NEEDS TO KNOW by Jennifer L. Tondu March 1988 Thesis Advisor: James G. Taylor Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. T24239 classified irity classification of this page REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Restrict ive Report Security Classification Lnclassified lb Markings Security Classification Authority 3 Distribution Availability of Report Declassification Downgrading Schedule Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Performing Organization Report Number(s) 5 Monitoring Organization Report Number(s) Name of Performing Organization 6b Office Symbol 7a Name of Monitoring Organization aval Postgraduate School (if applicable) 39 Naval Postgraduate School Address (city, state, and ZIP code) 7b Address (city, state, and ZIP code) onterev, CA 93943-5000 Monterey, CA 93943-5000 Name of Funding Sponsoring Organization 8b Office Symbol 9 Procurement Instrument Identification Number (if applicable) Address (dry, state, and ZIP code) 10 Source of Funding Numbers Program Element No Project No Task No Work Unit Accession N Title (include security classification) SOVIET NAVAL FORCE CONTROL AND THE RED NAVAL C3 SYSTEM: WHAT IE BLUE COMMANDER NEEDS TO KNOW Personal Author(s) Jennifer L. Tondu a Type of Report 13b Time Coyered 14 Date of Report (vear. month, day) Page Count aster's Thesis From To March 1988 90 Supplementary Notation The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or po- ion of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBUNE COMPANY Is a Media Industry Leader with Operations in 25 Major Markets Nationwide, Including 10 of the Top 12
    NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEWPORT NEWS NEW ORLEANS HARRISBURG ALBANY ALLENTOWN GREENWICH STAMFORD NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEWPORT NEWS NEW ORLEANS HARRISBURG ALBANY ALLENTOWN GREENWICH STAMFORD NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS Creating Value: 20 Years as a Public Company 2003 Annual Report TRIBUNE COMPANY is a media industry leader with operations in 25 major markets nationwide, including 10 of the top 12. Through newspapers, television, radio and the Internet, we reach more than 80 percent of U.S. households. Revenues in 2003 totaled $5.6 billion. Broadcasting TELEVISION WBDC (WB50) KTXL (FOX40) WTXX (WB20) TELEVISION PROGRAMMING WPIX (WB11) Washington Sacramento, Calif. Hartford, Conn. New York wbdc.com fox40.com wtxx.com Tribune wb11.com Entertainment Co. WATL (WB36) KPLR (WB11) WXMI
    [Show full text]
  • MH17 - Potential Suspects and Witnesses from the 53Rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade
    MH17 - Potential Suspects and Witnesses from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade A bell¿ngcat Investigation Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Section One: The 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ...................................................................................3 Section Two: Mobilization of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ................................................... 9 The 23-25 June 2014 Buk Convoy Vehicles ............................................................................................. 10 The 19-21 July 2014 Buk Convoy Vehicles .................................................................................................. 15 The 16 August 2014 Missile Transport ........................................................................................................ 17 Deployment of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade in the Summer of 2014 ....................... 20 Section Three: Soldiers of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ...................................................... 23 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 2nd Battalion of the 53rd Brigade in 2013 .................................................................................................... 26 3rd Battalion of the
    [Show full text]
  • Morrie Gelman Papers, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8959p15 No online items Morrie Gelman papers, ca. 1970s-ca. 1996 Finding aid prepared by Jennie Myers, Sarah Sherman, and Norma Vega with assistance from Julie Graham, 2005-2006; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1575 (310) 825-4988 [email protected] ©2016 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Morrie Gelman papers, ca. PASC 292 1 1970s-ca. 1996 Title: Morrie Gelman papers Collection number: PASC 292 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Language of Material: English Physical Description: 80.0 linear ft.(173 boxes and 2 flat boxes ) Date (inclusive): ca. 1970s-ca. 1996 Abstract: Morrie Gelman worked as a reporter and editor for over 40 years for companies including the Brooklyn Eagle, New York Post, Newsday, Broadcasting (now Broadcasting & Cable) magazine, Madison Avenue, Advertising Age, Electronic Media (now TV Week), and Daily Variety. The collection consists of writings, research files, and promotional and publicity material related to Gelman's career. Physical location: Stored off-site at SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact UCLA Library Special Collections for paging information. Creator: Gelman, Morrie Restrictions on Access Open for research. STORED OFF-SITE AT SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact UCLA Library Special Collections for paging information. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction Property rights to the physical object belong to the UC Regents. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Nuclear Chronology
    Russia Nuclear Chronology 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 2002 | 2001-2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997-1993 Last update: July 2010 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation 2010 10 January 2010 UNIT OF VOLGODONSK POWER PLANT UNDERGOES EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN The first power unit of the Volgodonsk nuclear power plant in south Russia was shut down by an emergency protection system. Problems with a steam generator were the likely cause of the protection system activation. Rosenergoatom reported a normal level of background radiation at the plant. The Volgodonsk power plant began operating in 2001. It is situated some 1,000 km (621 miles) south of Moscow and has a single pressurized water reactor. —"Radiation Level Normal at Volgodonsk NPP After Emergency Shutdown," RIA Novosti, 1 January 2010, http://en.rian.ru; "Volgodonsk NPP Shuts Down First Power Unit in Emergency Mode," RIA Novosti, 1 January 2010, http://en.rian.ru.
    [Show full text]
  • Source: Institute of National Remembrance (IPN-BU). Translated for CWIHP by Gary Goldberg.] SECRET Copy Nº 4 Exercise Appendix Nº 8
    [Source: Institute of National Remembrance (IPN-BU). Translated for CWIHP by Gary Goldberg.] SECRET Copy Nº 4 Exercise Appendix Nº 8 //Polish declassification stamp// COMBAT READY MEN AND EQUIPMENT OF THE WARSAW PACT COUNTRIES' AIR DEFENSE IN THE MARITIME SECTOR 13th GDR AIR DEFENSE Division, DEMMIN 43rd SAM Brigade, DAMGARTEN three S-75 m SAM battalions two S-125 m SAM battalions two S-200 SAM battalions 27th SAM Regiment, STRAUSBURG three S-75 m SAM battalions 19th Fighter Regiment, PEENEMÜNDE, GREIFSWALD 26 MiG-23's two S-125 SAM battalions 12th Fighter Regiment, DEMMIN 32 MiG-21 bis's 12th Polish AIR DEFENSE Division, SZCZECINEK 36th SAM Brigade, PŁOTY (colocated CP) five S-75 m SAM battalions four S-125 SAM battalions two S-200 SAM battalions 14th SAM Brigade LEMBORG [SIC, probably LEMBORK] (colocated CP) five S-75 m SAM battalions four S-125 m SAM battalions 36th Fighter Regiment, RESKO and BIAŁOGARD airfields 32 MiG-23's 38th Fighter Regiment, SŁAWNO and [POLIANOW] airfields 31 MiG-23's 46th Fighter Regiment, LEMBORG and WEJHEROWO airfields 33 MiG-21 bis's 127th USSR AIR DEFENSE Corps 101st SAM Brigade, LADUSHKIN five S-75 m SAM battalions three S-125 m SAM battalions two S-200 SAM battalions 68th Fighter Regiment, GUR'YEVSK and SUVOROVO airfields 12 MiG-25's 24 MiG-25's EXERCISE CONTROL STAFF ++++++++++++++++++++++++ [no headings] Name of rear units On hand as of Period of Mobilization and institutions 1900 20 January mobilization (arrival) areas (arrival) 1 2 3 1st PBTFl [Flotilla M3 GDAŃSK Rear Floating Base] 25th FlTB [Flotilla
    [Show full text]
  • TIMES MIRROR COMPANY ET AL V. CITY of LOS ANGELES
    192 Cal. App. 3d 170, *; 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1761, **; 237 Cal. Rptr. 346, ***; 14 Media L. Rep. 1289 TIMES MIRROR COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent No. B023000 Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two 192 Cal. App. 3d 170; 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1761; 237 Cal. Rptr. 346; 14 Media L. Rep. 1289 May 28, 1987 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [**1] Appellants' petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied September 2, 1987. Mosk, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted. PRIOR HISTORY: Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C511941, John L. Cole, Judge. DISPOSITION: The judgment is affirmed. CASE SUMMARY PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff newspapers appealed the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California) in favor of defendant city in plaintiffs' action that challenged the validity, on constitutional grounds, of a business tax imposed by defendant. OVERVIEW: Plaintiff newspapers challenged, on constitutional grounds, the validity of a business tax collected by defendant city. Defendant was awarded summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. The court found that there was no constitutional problem with the tax and affirmed the judgment. The court noted that although the government could not unduly burden free speech through taxation or other regulatory measures, it was beyond dispute that the federal constitution did not exempt newspapers from generally applicable regulations and taxes. The court further stated that a compelling state interest was not needed to collect such a tax as long as newspapers were treated no differently than others who were similarly situated.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATION CASTLE Report of Commander, Task Group 7.1
    11658 WT-940 (EX) EXTRACTED VERSION OPERATION CASTLE Report of Commander, Task Group 7.1 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico Pacific Proving Grounds March - May 1954 June 1954 NOTICE This is an,extract of WT-940, Operation CASTLE, Report of Commander, Task Group 7.1, which remains classified Secret/Restricted Data as of this date. Extract version prepared for: Director DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY Washington, D. C. 20305 1 February 1980 80 8 13 011 _-_-__~~*&!!&g-_.&)_,__~ - __- _’ _ SCCURIIY CLAS~l~lC4llON Of THIS PAGC (W.-n D.ra Lwwd) REPORTDOCU&ENTATlONPAGE READ INSTRUCTIONS 1 BEFORE COMPLETING FORY I . RLrORTYUYnLR 1. GOVT Acccr~loli “0 h. RCCIPIZNT’S CATALOG YLJuRLR WT-940 (EX) 1,. TITLE (-4 lubfltle) L. TtPL Of REPORT & PERIOD COVLRCD Operation CASTLE Report-of Commander, Task Group 7.1 i. PtRfORYING ORG. RLPORT NVYBLR 7 . AuTwOR(=J I. CONTIIACT OR GRANT NUH~LII(.) Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 8 . PfRfORUlNt ORGANIZATION NAME AN0 ADDRESS 10. PROGR4M LLLYENT. PROJECT. TASU AREA 6 WORK UMIT )rUUllLRS Ti I. CONTROLLING OFFICL NAME AND ADDRESS IZ. REPORT DATE June 1954 13. NUMBER OF PAGES 71 ?: L. YONITORIWG AGENCY NAME l ADoRESS(rf differrnf horn tonl,.,llln# 0tfir.J 1s. SECURITY CLASS. (of rhl. r.pon) Unclassified --- ?5 . DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of rhla Report) Approved for public release; unlimited distribution. x SUPPLE~ENTARW NOTES T his report has had the classified information removed and has been republished in nclassified form for public release. This work was performed by the General Electric F ompany-TEMPO under contract DNAOOl-79-C-0455 with the close cooperation of the C lassification Management Division of the Defense Nuclear Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinclair's Use of Shield Law Unanimously Upheld by the Supreme Court of California BALTIMORE, Nov. 3 /Prnewswire/ -- on November
    Sinclair's Use of Shield Law Unanimously Upheld by the Supreme Court of California BALTIMORE, Nov. 3 /PRNewswire/ -- On November 1, 1999, the Supreme Court of California unanimously overturned the California Court of Appeal and upheld the right of a Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBGI) news director at KOVR-TV in Sacramento, California to invoke the California Constitution's shield law in refusing to disclose unpublished information to a State of California prosecutor. The State unsuccessfully asserted that its state right to "due process of law" was being violated. In its decision, the California Supreme Court emphasized the importance of protecting the autonomy of the press. The case (Miller vs. The Superior Court of San Joaquin County) involved the refusal by KOVR-TV's news director, in the face of contempt of court charges, to turn over to a state prosecutor unpublished portions of a videotaped interview with a prisoner who had confessed to sheriff's investigators that he had killed his cellmate. KOVR-TV invoked the shield law in support of its decision to submit only the broadcast portions of the interview rather than the entire interview which had been subpoenaed by the State of California. The Supreme Court of California upheld the use of the shield law and stated that the California shield law provided an absolute right, under California's state constitution, to protection for unpublished information that may only be overcome by a countervailing federal constitutional right (such as by a defendant's right to due process), and perhaps by a state constitutional right, but not by a "prosecutor's right to due process" (i.e, to receive information that may help the prosecutor win his case).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Biographies, Photos of RF Armed Forces Leadership CEP20090303351001 Moscow Rossiyskoye Voyennoye Obozreniye in Russian 29 Dec 08 No 12 2008 Pp 55-66
    UNCLASSIFIED This product may contain copyrighted material; authorized use is for national security purposes of the United States Government only. Any reproduction, dissemination, or use is subject to the OSC usage policy and the original copyright. Russia: Biographies, Photos of RF Armed Forces Leadership CEP20090303351001 Moscow Rossiyskoye Voyennoye Obozreniye in Russian 29 Dec 08 No 12 2008 pp 55-66 Dmitriy Anatolyevich Medvedev, President of Russian Federation/Supreme Commander of RF Armed Forces Born in city of Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) on 14 September 1965. Completed law faculty of Leningrad State University (LGU) in 1987 and LGU postgraduate studies in 1990. Candidate of juridical sciences, docent. During 1990-1999 instructed at St. Petersburg State University. Simultaneously during 1990-1995 advisor to Leningrad City Council chairman, expert of St. Petersburg Mayor's Office Foreign Relations Committee. In 1999 deputy head of RF Government Apparatus. During 1999-2000 deputy head of RF President's Administration. From 2000 first deputy head of RF President's Administration. During 2000-2001 chairman of Board of Directors of Gazprom Open Joint-Stock Company (OAO), in 2001 deputy chairman of Gazprom OAO Board of Directors, from June 2002 chairman of Gazprom OAO Board of Directors. From October 2003 head of RF President's Administration. In November 2005 appointed first deputy chairman of RF Government. On 2 March 2008 elected President of Russian Federation. Married. Wife Svetlana Vladimirovna Medvedeva. The Medvedevs have a son, Ilya. Anatoliy Eduardovich Serdyukov, Defense Minister of Russian Federation Born in settlement of Kholmskiy, Abinskiy Rayon, Krasnodar Kray on 8 January 1962. Completed Leningrad Institute of Soviet Trade in 1984 in "economist" specialty.
    [Show full text]