Yerba Buena Island Interim Grading for Water Tank Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yerba Buena Island Interim Grading for Water Tank Area YERBA BUENA ISLAND INTERIM GRADING FOR WATER TANK AREA YERBA BUENA ISLAND PROJECT Sub-Phase 1YA & 1YB City and County of San Francisco, California PROJECT MANUAL BID SPECIFICATIONS VOLUME II TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Prepared By: Treasure Island Community Development, LLC (“Owner”) c/o Lennar Urban One Sansome Street Suite 3200 San Francisco, California 94104 May 10, 2016 Yerba Buena Island – Interim Grading for Water Tank Area Sub-Phase 1YA & 1YB SECTION 00010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Information Section Title 00001 Title Page 00010 Table of Contents 00015 List of Project Drawings 00020 Contract Division 0 Proposal Documents and General Conditions Section Title 00100 Notice to Bidders 00200 Instructions to Bidders 00210 Employment and Contracting Policies 00410 Bid Form 00435 Designated Subcontractors List 00480 Non-Collusion Affidavit 00800 Supplementary Conditions 00802 Contract Time & Liquidated Damages 00810 Existing Conditions 00811 Unforeseen or Differing Site Conditions 00812 Bidder’s Site Visit 00813A Noise Control Ordinance 00813B Industrial Waste Ordinance No. 116-97 00813C Department of Public Works Order No. 158170 00820 Health & Safety Plan Division 1 General Requirements Section Title 01010 Summary of Work 01025 Measurement and Payment 01032 Photographic Documentation 01035 Modification Procedures 01040 Coordination 01041 Contractor’s Project Management Team 01050 Field Engineering 01060 Regulatory Requirements 01090 Reference Standards 01200 Project Meetings 01300 Submittals 01310 Progress Schedules 01400 Quality Control 01500 Environmental Compliance 01500A Environmental Health and Safety Plan 01500B Sampling and Analysis Plan 01500C Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 00010-1 Table of Contents YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1YA & 1YB STANDARD SPECIFICATION 4/25/2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS – 100% DESIGN SET DIVISION 1– GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01570 Traffic Routing Work DIVISION 2 – SITEWORK 02050 Demolition 02140 Dewatering 02200 Earthwork 02225 Excavation, Backfilling and Compacting for Utilities 02230 Tree Protection 02310 Finished Grading 02512 Low Pressure Water 02536 Separate Storm Drain 02537-01 Pipe Size and Material Summary 02580 Signing, Pavement Markings, and Curb Painting 02740 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 02910 Hydroseed 02921 -02 Erosion Control 03300 Cast-in-Place Concrete TABLE OF CONTENTS YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1B, 1C & 1E STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3/2/2016 SECTION 01570 TRAFFIC ROUTING WORK PART I - GENERAL 1.1 WORK INCLUDED A. The Contractor shall prepare a traffic control plan as required by the SFMTA or other regulatory agency for all phases of work. B. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements set forth in the “YERBA BUENA ISLAND Construction Traffic Management Program dated XXXX” provided in the project Reference documents. 1.2 APPLICABLE STANDARDS A. In addition to compliance with this specification, the Contractor shall comply with all applicable requirements of the latest editions of the following: 1. California Vehicle Code. 2. San Francisco Municipal Code, Chapter XI- Traffic Code. 3. Other Applicable Regulations. 4. Standard Specifications, Department of Public Works, City and County of San Francisco. 5. Standard Specifications and Plans, Department of Transportation, State of California (Caltrans Standard Specifications and Caltrans Standard Plans) except as modified herein. 6. Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones, Department of Transportation, State of California. 7. Regulations for Working in San Francisco Streets (“Blue Book”), Department of Parking and Traffic, City and County of San Francisco. 8. Regulations for Excavating and Restoring Streets in San Francisco, Department of Public Works, City and County of San Francisco. 9. Work Area Traffic Control Handbook, BNI Books. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. The Contractor shall make the following submittals and obtain written approval from the traffic engineer before starting any work in the streets: 1. Traffic Control Plans 2. Storage and Parking Plan 3. Sign Inventory Form B. Traffic Control Plans shall be prepared, signed and stamped by a professional engineer or a traffic engineer (registered in the State of California) with the assistance and input of the traffic supervisor and the Contractor’s Superintendent in accordance with the Transportation and Disposal plan provided in Section 01500A. TRAFFIC ROUTING WORK 01570-1 YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1B, 1C & 1E STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3/2/2016 The Traffic Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by SFMTA as required. All work required by the Approved Traffic Control Plan shall be performed at the Contractors expense. Complete traffic control and detour plans shall be submitted and approved prior to any work beginning on Project Site. No Change Orders shall be awarded due to the Contractor’s failure to secure the appropriate traffic permits for the Work. C. Sign Inventory Form(s) is/are to be submitted by the Contractor as part of the Traffic Control Plan prior to the start of the Work. The Sign Inventory Form is included at the end of this Section. Sign Inventory Forms are required for each intersection corner or other location that includes any sign relocation, sign removal, pole or traffic signal work. Sign Inventory Forms shall accurately reflect all existing traffic control, street name, and other City signs at the required location(s). D. Storage and Parking Plans. The Contractor shall submit plans for materials storage and equipment parking, for each area of the work, along with the traffic control plans. For materials storage and equipment parking, the Contractor shall comply with the latest edition of the Regulations for Excavating and Restoring Streets in San Francisco, Department of Public Works, City and County of San Francisco. Storage, stockpiling or placement shall not in any way obstruct any lane or passageway intended for vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Storage, stockpiling, or placement of any equipment, materials or supplies within the area of any public street or alley, including the sidewalks thereof, will be allowed only with approved storage and parking plans by the traffic engineer. If the engineer determines that such storage, stockpiling or placement causes a violation of the foregoing or of any law or order of any regulatory body having jurisdiction, the Contractor shall cease or modify the storage, stockpiling or placement as necessary to comply with the specifications, laws and orders. PART 2 – PRODUCTS 2.1 GENERAL A. All products used for Traffic Control shall be as required by the SFMTA’s “Blue Book”. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. The Contractor shall establish contact with the SFMTA prior to commencement of the Work to ensure that it has secured all the necessary permits for the Work. END OF SECTION TRAFFIC ROUTING WORK 01570-2 YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1B, 1C & 1E STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3/2/2016 Appendix Sign Inventory Form Date: Contract No: Sign Location Side Double sided Sign Comments Type x’ from property of St. Single sided Description line of cross st. Contractor’s Signature TRAFFIC ROUTING WORK 01570-3 YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1B, 1C & 1E STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3/2/2016 SECTION 02050 DEMOLITION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. Standard Specifications of the City and County of San Francisco, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering (SSDPWSF), Latest Edition, also referred to as “City Standard Specifications.” B. Standard Plans of the City and County of San Francisco, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering (SPDPWSF), Latest Edition, also referred to as “City Standard Plans.” C. Department of Public Works (DPW) Order No. 176,707 "Regulations for Excavating and Restoring Streets in San Francisco", approved March 26, 2007. D. Design Geotechnical Report, Yerba Buena Island Major Phase 1, Sub-Phases 1B, 1C, 1E Infrastructure Improvements, prepared by ENGEO Inc., dated XXXX. E. California Health and Safety Code 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS Section 02200, “Earthwork” Section 02225, “Excavation, Backfilling and Compacting for Utilities”. 1.3 SUMMARY A. Section includes (but is not necessarily limited to): 1. Demolition and removal of existing improvements as indicated on the Drawings 2. Requirements for addressing complaints received by the Contractor B. Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this Section shall be considered as included in the Contract Lump Sum Price and no additional compensation will be allowed therefore. C. Information for the Contractor's use in preparing the demolition plan is provided in this Section. 1.4 DEMOLITION PLAN A. The Contractor shall submit a complete demolition plan to the Owner's Agent detailing procedures and sequence of the work, including traffic signing, salvage, disposal, and material handling. B. The Contractor shall thoroughly investigate the existing conditions at the site before DEMOLITION 02050-1 YERBA BUENA ISLAND 100% IMPROVEMENT PLANS SUB-PHASE 1B, 1C & 1E STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3/2/2016 proceeding with the demolition plan. C. The demolition plan shall consist of the following: 1. The removal sequence for all items. 2. Equipment locations during removal operations. 3. Temporary support shoring or temporary bracing, if necessary. 4. Details and locations of shields or other protective measures in sufficient numbers to assure that people, property and improvements will not
Recommended publications
  • The Third Crossing
    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: an Overview
    Marine Geology 345 (2013) 3–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo Sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: An overview Patrick L. Barnard a,⁎, David H. Schoellhamer b,c, Bruce E. Jaffe a, Lester J. McKee d a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA, USA c University of California, Davis, USA d San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: The papers in this special issue feature state-of-the-art approaches to understanding the physical processes Received 29 March 2012 related to sediment transport and geomorphology of complex coastal–estuarine systems. Here we focus on Received in revised form 9 April 2013 the San Francisco Bay Coastal System, extending from the lower San Joaquin–Sacramento Delta, through the Accepted 13 April 2013 Bay, and along the adjacent outer Pacific Coast. San Francisco Bay is an urbanized estuary that is impacted by Available online 20 April 2013 numerous anthropogenic activities common to many large estuaries, including a mining legacy, channel dredging, aggregate mining, reservoirs, freshwater diversion, watershed modifications, urban run-off, ship traffic, exotic Keywords: sediment transport species introductions, land reclamation, and wetland restoration. The Golden Gate strait is the sole inlet 9 3 estuaries connecting the Bay to the Pacific Ocean, and serves as the conduit for a tidal flow of ~8 × 10 m /day, in addition circulation to the transport of mud, sand, biogenic material, nutrients, and pollutants.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C: Index of Transformative Projects & Strategies Submitted Project Names May Have Been Updated Slightly Since Submission
    METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Attachment C: Index of Transformative Projects & Strategies Submitted Project names may have been updated slightly since submission. Incomplete submissions were omitted from this list. Not all projects shown met the criteria for the Transformative Projects competition. Transformative Projects Aerial Tram Lines (San Francisco to North Bay and East Bay) Air Shuttle Network (Livermore to Central Valley) BART First/Last Mile Gondola Services Drone Delivery Network Dumbarton Gondola Line Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing Aircraft and Ports Flying Car Transit Network Mountain View International Airport Aerial Oakland/Alameda Gondola Network Regional Helicopter Network Automated Bus and Rail Service + Frequency Increase Autonomous TNC Service in Urban Areas AV Shuttle Circulators AV Shuttle System AV Shuttle System for BART Station Areas Autonomous Benicia Autonomous Bus Network Technologies Contra Costa Autonomous Shuttle Program I-80 Corridor Overhaul Mountain View AV Shuttle System AV Shuttles at Rockridge and 12th St BART Stations BART Evening Frequency Increase BART Extension from Civic Center to Ocean Beach BART Extension from E. Santa Clara to Eastridge Transit Center BART Extension from Santa Clara to Tasman Drive BART Extension from Hayward to Millbrae BART Extension from Millbrae to San Jose (x4) BART Extension from Millbrae to Santa Clara BART Extension from Milpitas to Martinez (via I-680) BART Extension from Milpitas to
    [Show full text]
  • Phocoena Phocoena) to San Francisco Bay S
    Return of Harbor Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to San Francisco Bay S. Jonathan Stern,†1, 2 William Keener,1 Isidore D. Szczepaniak,1 and Marc A. Webber1 1Golden Gate Cetacean Research, 9 Edgemar Way, Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA E-mail: [email protected] 2San Francisco State University, Biology Department, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA Supplemental Appendix Chronology of San Francisco Bay (SF Bay) harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) observations prior to October 2008* Date Location Observation Reference 2600-700 BP Emeryville Skeletal remains in midden Broughton, 1999 1874 SF Bay Seine fishing bycatch Scammon, 1874 1906 SF Bay “Formerly abundant” “Save the Seal,” 1906 1915 SF Bay “Still enter . occasionally” Kofoid, 1915 1924 SF Bay Bycaught individual Hohn & Brownell, 1990 Late 1920s Raccoon Strait Multiple sightings M. McDonough, pers. comm., 15 November 2008 1939, 1941 & 1942 Point Richmond Multiple sightings Benson, 1939-1942 1958 Point Richmond Few sightings K. Clausen, pers. comm., 29 November 2015 1972 SF Bay “Occasionally sighted” Orr, 1972 1975 Fort Baker Sighting of one Huber, 1982 1978 Sausalito Sighting of one Szczepaniak, 1990 1985 SF Yacht Harbor Sighting of one Szczepaniak, 1990 2000 Yerba Buena Island Sighting of one Green et al., 2006 2004 Crissy Field Sighting of one J. Yakich, pers. comm., 4 September 2012 2005-2006 Central Bay Sailboat log entry, S. G. Allen, pers. comm., four sighted 20 March 2012 2007 July Napa River Photographed two Todorov, 2007 2007 September Central Bay Sailboat log entry, S. G. Allen, pers. comm., one sighted 20 March 2012 2007 November Central Bay Videotaped two in oil spill KCRA TV, 2007 2008 July SF Yacht Harbor Sailboat log entry, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerald Cook, Cih, Csp, Chmm, Eit Senior Industrial Hygienist
    JERALD COOK, CIH, CSP, CHMM, EIT SENIOR INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST PROFILE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Senior Industrial Hygienist • Intertek-PSI • 2000 – Present Provides project support for indoor air quality, asbestos and lead hazard management, moisture and mold restoration, and environmental site assessment. General duties include performing field investigations for hazardous materials remediation, assisting with data analysis and report review, client management, business development, project team development, and cost estimating. PROJECT EXPERIENCE ABOUT • San Francisco State University: Performed field testing and assisted with abatement design and project management for asbestos Jerald is a Senior Industrial projects, lead-based paint removal projects, and evaluation of heavy Hygienist with over 20 years of experience in the EHS field. metals contamination. He has technical expertise in • California State University - East Bay: Performed field testing and safety and industrial hygiene assisted with abatement design and project management for water with an emphasis on quality assessments, asbestos projects, lead-based paint removal evaluating and remediating projects, and evaluation of heavy metals contamination. contamination. • Hayward Unified School District: Performed field testing and assisted with abatement design and project management for moisture and CERTIFICATIONS mold restoration projects. • AECOM-Hunt/Southland Construction: San Francisco Giants Spring Certified Industrial Hygienist Training Facility, Project Manager for USGBC
    [Show full text]
  • < ?/& — YERBA BUENA ISLAND SUBSTATION HAER No. CA-229
    CAL- <■?/& — YERBA BUENA ISLAND SUBSTATION HAER No. CA-229 (Key System Electrical Substation - Yerba Buena Island) (Island Railway Substation) San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge System Adjacent to north side of bridge on Yerba Buena Island San Francisco San Francisco County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD C&L. YERBA BUENA ISLAND SUBSTATION «?/£> — (Key System Electrical Substation) (Island Railway Substation) HAER No. CA - 229 Location: San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge System, Yerba Buena Island, City and County of San Francisco, California. Situated north of the lower deck of the San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge, north of the tunnel's east portal, between the Bridge roadway and the westbound on-ramp to the bridge. UTM Zone 10: 556050, 4185840, USGS 7.5 Quad Oakland West, 1959 (rev.1980) Significance: This small building was constructed as an electrical substation for the Key System trains that originally ran on the Bay Bridge, from Oakland to the Transbay Terminal in San Francisco. It was a vital component of the Bay Bridge. Although electric trains no longer run on the bridge, this building has retained its original use as an electrical substation and its association with the historic bridge. The building also possesses a high degree of integrity, with alterations limited to replacement of the electrical equipment that it contains. The building is therefore eligible for National Register listing as a contributing component of the Bay Bridge. Description: This one story building is a rectangular concrete box, approximately 50 feet long (east to west) by 36 feet wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Bay
    ABOVE & BELOW | EXHIBITION LESSONS Mapping the Bay. Instructions for Teachers This lesson is to be done in class before visiting the museum and uses a map of the Bay to orient students to the geography of the Bay Area. Make copies of the map for students. Explain that on the left side, there is a wide border— this is not land. Students should understand that the Pacific Ocean extends beyond that border. Before You Start With the Map In order to do this assignment you need a projection of the map or a larger copy or to draw what you need on the board. Most students will work best if they can see what you are directing them to place on the map. Make sure you circulate around the class to assist where necessary. You also might want to download or get a copy of a San Francisco Bay Area Map [baycityguide.com provides a map that is useful] and a map with the bridges that cross the bay. [Bay Area Toll Authority makes a map that is useful]. Allow time for students to look at the shape of bay and how it is formed. Ask students why it might be called a Bay—how the Bay might have been formed, etc. Mapping the Bay The lower left hand border is a good place to put a compass rose. Students should use the lower left hand corner to put a compass rose with the cardinal directions: North, South, East, West. After you have the directions identified, have students find and write in the east bay, north bay, and south bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of San Francisco
    © 2009 Nature in the City, First Edition First City, the in Nature 2009 © Sandhill Skipper Sandhill the Bay. the Nature in the City the in Nature of shoreline the southeast southeast the Crissy Field and and Field Crissy A Publication of Publication A be found at at found be can Skipper The Sandhill Sandhill The www.natureinthecity.org Sachem (rare) Sachem Skipper Woodland 415-564-4107 San Francisco, CA 94117 CA Francisco, San P.O. Box 170088 Box P.O. Nature in the City the in Nature protect and restore nature in the city. the in nature restore and protect inhabit. Contact the organizations below to help help to below organizations the Contact inhabit. native wildlife, plants and the natural areas they they areas natural the and plants wildlife, native endangered. We need your help to save our city’s city’s our save to help your need We endangered. ies’ habitats are seriously seriously are habitats ies’ fl butter our of some but Our city still harbors tremendous native biodiversity, biodiversity, native tremendous harbors still city Our Three less common (seasonal): common less Three San Francisco’s natural history. natural Francisco’s San highlighting brochure City the in Nature where they live. We hope you enjoy this very first first very this enjoy you hope We live. they where Skipper and habitats, by connecting urban people with nature nature with people urban connecting by habitats, and Fiery Skipper Fiery Checkered Common animals, plants, native its bioregion, Franciscan Nature in the City conserves and restores the the restores and conserves City the in Nature – Liam O’Brien Liam – undoubtedly want to learn more! more! learn to want undoubtedly about San Francisco’s butterflies you will will you butterflies Francisco’s San about garden or local park.
    [Show full text]
  • The 11 Biggest Bay Area Transportation Projects — and When They’Ll Be Done
    The 11 biggest Bay Area transportation projects — and when they’ll be done Transportation Guide WHEN WILL THEY BE DONE? The Bay Area's 11 biggest transportation projects By Michael Cabanatuan | March 14, 2019 As more people come to the Bay Area and the trips to and from work become longer, commuters frequently find themselves white-knuckling the steering wheel, jostling for space on a bus or train, or simply dreaming of better days. While the problem of overcrowding on public transit and highways is unlikely to be solved any time soon, here are 11 major transportation projects that should improve the daily commute. Click on the maps below to learn more about each project Central Subway Caltrain upgrades Bay Bridge west span Second Transbay Tube bike path Marin-Sonoma Narrows BART extension to San Highway express lanes SMART extensions Scroll to maps Jose https://projects.sfchronicle.com/2019/bay-area-transit-projects/[8/21/2019 1:05:27 PM] The 11 biggest Bay Area transportation projects — and when they’ll be done Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Richmond-San Rafael San Francisco Ferry Bridge bike path Terminal expansion Central Subway Estimated Completion Date: Dec. 2019 Cost: $1.6 billion For nine years the construction of Muni’s 1.7-mile Central Subway has disrupted the core of San Francisco by closing streets, rerouting traffic and https://projects.sfchronicle.com/2019/bay-area-transit-projects/[8/21/2019 1:05:27 PM] The 11 biggest Bay Area transportation projects — and when they’ll be done buses, and pushing customers away from merchants.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island (Collectively the “Islands”) Are Located in the San Francisco Bay, About Halfway Between the San Francisco Mainland and Oakland
    TREASURE ISLAND/YERBA BUENA ISLAND AREA PLAN INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island (collectively the “Islands”) are located in the San Francisco Bay, about halfway between the San Francisco mainland and Oakland. The Islands together consist of approximately 550 acres. Direct access to Yerba Buena Island is currently provided only by the Bay Bridge, which is linked to Treasure Island by a causeway. Treasure Island was originally constructed in 1937 as a possible site for the San Francisco Airport, but was first used to host the Golden Gate International Exposition from 1939-1040. Shortly thereafter in World War II, the United States Department of Defense converted the island into a Naval Station, former Naval Station Treasure Island (“NTSI”). NTSI was owned by the United States Navy and operated as an active military base for more than five decades until it was closed by the Base Realignment and Closure Commission in 1993 and ceased operations in 1997. Subsequent to the closure of NTSI the Navy transferred 37 acres in the center of Treasure Island to the Department of Labor for the Job Corps Facility. Additionally, 39 acres on Yerba Buena Island is owned and operated by the U.S. Coast Guard and 18 acres by the Federal Highway Administration. In 1997 the State legislature passed AB 699, the Treasure Island Conversion Act, which designated the Treasure Island Development Authority (“TIDA”) as a redevelopment agency under California Community Redevelopment Law with authority over NTSI and vested in TIDA the authority to administer the Public Trust for property on NTSI subject to the Public Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • 131, and CA-MER-215) Date from Before the Early Holocene Period
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts D. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES D.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section assesses the potential for the presence of archaeological and paleontological resources in the Project Area, provides a context for evaluating the significance of archaeological resources that may be encountered, evaluates the potential impacts on archaeological resources, and provides mitigation measures that would avoid or minimize potential impacts on archaeological and paleontological resources. An independent consultant has prepared an Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (“ARDTP”) for the Treasure Island / Yerba Buena Island Redevelopment Plan Project Area.1 The research and recommendations of the ARDTP are the basis for the information and conclusions of this EIR section with respect to archaeological resources. SETTING Context In order to predict the archaeological property types that may exist within the Project Area and provide a context for evaluating the significance of archaeological resources that may be encountered, the ARDTP provides a historic context for prehistoric era and historic era settlement in the vicinity of the Project Area. Geologic Setting Yerba Buena Island and Treasure Island are part of a highly dynamic geologic landscape. About 200 million years ago, the Pacific Plate was subducted under the North American Plate, producing what is known as the Franciscan Complex of rocks. These constitute the basement rock for the Coast Ranges east of the modern San Andreas Fault, including the San Francisco Peninsula and the islands of the San Francisco Bay. The islands in the Bay (with the exception of the man-made Treasure Island) were formed generally from faulting, downwarping, and flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. References
    7. REFERENCES CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES Acoustical Society of America. 1978. American National Standard Method for the Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere. ANSI S1.26-1978; ASA 23-1978. New York, New York. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP). 1980. Treatment of Archeological Properties; A Handbook. Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority. 1995. NAS Alameda Community Reuse Plan, Phase II Conditions and Trends Report, January 1995. Prepared by EDAW, Inc. Allen, S.G. 1991. Harbor seal habitat restoration at Strawberry Spit, San Francisco Bay. Point Reyes Bird Observatory Report PB91-212332/GAR. 47 pp. 2001. Personal Communication with Ann Zoidis, Tetra Tech. December 6, 2001. Allen, Wanda. 1996. Educational Integration Specialist, Educational Placement Office, San Francisco Unified School District, communication with Melissa Mednick, Mara Feeney & Associates. April 23, 1996. Anderson, D.W., and I.T. Anderson. 1976. Distribution and status of brown pelicans in the California Current. Am. Birds 30:3-12. Anderson, Susan L., John P. Knezovich, et al. 1995. The Utility of Pore Water Toxicity for Development of Site-Specific Marine Sediment Quality Objectives for Metals, Final Report. September 1995. Aplin, J.A. 1967. Biological survey of San Francisco Bay, 1963-1966. California Department of Fish and Game, Mar. Resour. Oper., MRO Ref. 67-4. 131 pp. C:\Documents and Settings\sfojml\My Documents\TI\06TI_1\7-0.docTransfer and Reuse of Naval Station Treasure Island Draft EIR June 2006 7-1 7. References Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 1990. Hazardous Material Problems in Earthquakes: A Guide to Their Cause and Mitigation. 72 pp. November 1990.
    [Show full text]