Bronchophony. Thisis More Intense Than Normal Vocal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AN INVESTIGATION INTO SOME OF THE PRIN- CIPLES OF AUSCULTATION. By ALBERT A. GRAY, M.D. Glasgow. (Continued from page 232.) PART II.-B. Changes in Quality of Sound conducted through the Lung. HITHERTo differences in intensity of the auscultatory signs have been considered. It remains to investigate the differences in quality which occur when sound is transmitted through the lungs to the ear. It is evident that in this part of the investigations the tuning-fork can help us but little: being a pure note, either entirely without audible partial tones, or very nearly so, there can be no change in the quality of the sound. For the most part we must depend upon the voice and the respiratory murmur to represent compound tones and sounds. Of these two the voice is, for the present purpose of investigation, the more valuable, because we know exactly where it is pro- duced and its acoustic characters; but there is some doubt as to the point of generation of the respiratory murmur. The physician recognizes four types of the thoracic voice,- the Normal Vocal Resonance; Bronchophony; £Egophony; and Pectoriloquy. The characteristics usually associated with each are: (1) Normal Vocal Resonance. An indefinite humming or buzzing noise; the spoken words are not distinguish- able. (2) Bronchophony. This is more intense than normal vocal resonance; the words are distinguishable; it is usually associated with increased vocal fremitus. (3) }Egophony. The voice is not quite so intense as in bronchophony, and is not associated with increase of INVESTIGATION INTO SOME PRINCIPLES OF AUSCULTATION. 355 the vocal fremitus. The sound is high-pitched, with a very pronounced nasal twang. Laennec compared it to the voice of Punch (I'Auscultation mediate, tome i. sec. 154) (4) Pectoriloquy. In this type the characteristic feature is not so much a difference in the quality of the musical part of speech, but a remarkable distinctness of the consonants. Usually the patient is told to whisper, in order that the vowels may not overpower the con- sonants. It is usually heard over phthisical cavities, when bronchophony may also be heard if the patient speak in the ordinary voice. What are the causes of these changes in quality? In the first place, it is evident that if the investigation is to have any scientific value, the acoustic character of speech must be borne in mind. The works of reference which the writer has used for this purpose are Helmholtz' Tonempftndung, chapters v. and vi., 1870; and Gavarret's Audition et Phonation, pp. 310-400, 1877. Normal Vocal Resonance. On page 215 of this paper it will be seen that, in the writer's opinion, Skoda was justified in assuming that a certain amount of resonance or reinforcement of sound would occur in the trachea and bronchi. In considering alterations in quality, it appears that this statement will be fully justified, but in a way exactly the opposite of that which Skoda meant. When phonation occurs, there is no doubt that the sound will pass downwards into the chest, both by the walls of the respi- ratory tract and by the air enclosed in those structures. The question at issue is, to find out to what extent the sound occur- ring in these two media reaches the stethoscope. Skoda main- tained that the vibrations which occurred in the air were finally transmitted to the tissues, and thence to the stethoscope; while Laennec and most physicians nowadays hold that chiefly the sounds occurring in the walls reach the instrument. It appears to the writer that there can be no doubt that vibrations pass to the parietes by both media, though to a vary- ing extent, both in health and disease. 356 DR ALBERT A. GRAY. In health it is very plain that any sound occurring in the air in the bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli will, without much diffi- culty, pass into the tissue, because the healthy lung is such an exceedingly light, delicate structure, easily set in vibration by a sound occurring in the air which is in contact with it. From the parenchyma the sound will easily pass into the stethoscope. Similarly, vibrations conducted downwards by the walls of the respiratory tract will pass by the walls of the bronchioles and alveoli to the instrument, provided of course that these struc- tures are tense. To what extent do these two sets of vibrations contribute to the normal vocal resonance? It would be impossible to say accurately; but it appears to the writer that the reason why the normal thoracic voice is so indefinite, and of a buzzing or humming character, is, that all that part of the sound which has passed down by the air has become confused in its course by constant reflection. It is a well-known fact that the voice becomes rapidly confused and indistinct if it be passed through a tube with elastic or rigid walls; the reason being that the consonants or articulate parts of speech become overpowered by the more musical or continuous parts, because of reflection of sound or reverberation. Normal Respiratory Murmur. Before considering changes in the quality of the respiratory murmur, it is necessary that the point of origin of that sound be discussed. In regard to this point, the theory most in vogue at present is, that the normal respiratory murmur occurs at those points where the bronchioles open into the infundibula (Fagge and Pye-Smith, op. cit., vol. i. pp. 935 and 936; Bristowe, op. cit., p. 387). A few physicians, however, hold that the normal respiratory murmur is produced at the larynx, and conducted to the stethoscope through the lungs. There are some serious objections to the hypothesis that this murmur is produced in the iufundibula. (1) It has never been shown that the passage of an exceed- ingly minute quantity of air from a minute tube ( 5 mm. diameter,-M'Kendrick, op. cit., p. 299) into a minute cavity really does produce a sound at all. The amount of air actually INVESTIGATION INTO SOME PRINCIPLES OF AUSCULTATION. 357 passing in and out of each infundibulum during the inspiration and expiration must be exceedingly little, because the whole con- tents of an infundibulum is very small, and the differences in the cubic space during expiration and inspiration must be far smaller still, because there is no approach to collapse of the structure during expiration. Could, then, these exceedingly minute quantities of air really produce a sound in the infundi- bula of such intensity that, even summed up together, the result would be audible at the thoracic wall? To the writer it appears highly improbable that they could, and most certainly it has never been shown that they do. Therefore the present theory has to assume that a sound occurs at all,-an assumption which has no basis in fact. This objection is a very serious one. (2) The theory in question totally fails to explain the occur- rence of the expiratory portion of the respiratory murmur. That is to say, even if the inspiratory portion were accounted for by assuming that a fluid vein in the infundibulum produced the sound, there is no fluid vein at all during expiration. Fagge (op. cit., vol. i.; op. cit., p. 936, footnote) suggests that the bron- chiole may project into the infundibulum and form a rim. Now, there is no evidence at all, either anatomical or other, for supposing that such a condition exists; and even if it were the case, there is no proof that such a structure could produce a sound during expiration. (3) It is a well-known clinical fact, and was pointed out by Stokes long ago (Pye-Smith and Fagge, op. cit., vol. i. p. 936), that when the larynx is diseased it is often difficult or impos- sible to tell by auscultation if the lung is healthy or affected. Now, if the normal respiratory murmur depended upon the formation of a fluid vein in the infundibula, it is difficult to see why it should be altered by changes at the larynx (dyspncea is understood to be absent). (4) The experiments upon which in great part this theory rests are open to quite other interpretations than those put forward by the supporters of the theory. These experiments were per- formed by Bondeau, Bergeon, and Chauveau, and are to be found in the Gazette Hebdom., December 1863, Paris. The trachea of a horse was cut through and dragged out through the wound in the skin. On listening over the lungs the inspiratory murmur VOL. XXXI. (N.S. VOL. XI.) 2 A 358' DR ALBERT A. GRAY. was not diminished in intensity. From this experiment it was held as proven that the inspiratory murmur could not be pro- duced at the larynx. It appears to the writer that there is this fallacy: the trachea could hardly be brought through a wound of such a nature without either being pinched by the edges of the wound, or being bent and narrowed at the point where it is turned out of its natural course before being brought through the wound. This sudden narrowing would produce all the requisite conditions for a fluid vein, so that the sound heard over the lung by the observers may after all have been a sound transmitted from the trachea. Another experiment to which, perhaps, most importance was attached was as follows:-The pneumo-gastric nerve of a horse was cut through; on listening over the thorax and trachea respectively, the inspiratory murmur was found to have disap- peared over the thorax, while the tracheal murmur remained. From this it was assumed that the muscular walls of the bron- chioles were paralysed, and hence opened into the infundibula by wide funnel-shaped mouths, and no fluid vein was formed (Pye-Smith and Fagge, op.