Class Against Class the Communist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CLASS AGAINST CLASS THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREAT BRITAIN IN THE THIRD PERIOD, 1927-1932. By Matthew Worley, BA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August 1998. C TEXT BOUND INTO THE SPINE Acknowledgments This thesis would not have beenpossible without the guidance, encouragementand advice of my supervisorChris Wrigley. Professor Wrigley's encyclopaedicknowledge and ever expanding library madethis project a joy to complete.Closer to home, the loving support and patient encouragementof Louise Aikman kept me focusedand inspired whenever the pressuresof study appearedtoo much to bear. Thanks are also due to Chris, Pete and Simon (for a lifetime's friendship), Scott King (for welcome distractions),Dominic and Andrea (for help and camaraderie), Pete and Kath (for holidays), John (for Manchester),my family (for everything) and Toby Wolfe. ii Contents Abstract iv Abbreviations A Introduction: The Communist Party of Great Britain I in the Third Period Chapter One: A Party in Transition 15 Chapter Two: Towards the Third Period 45 Chapter Three: The New Line 82 Chapter Four: The Party in Crisis 113 Chapter Five: Isolation and Reappraisal 165 Chapter Six: A Communist Culture 206 Chapter Seven: Crisis and Reorganisation 236 Conclusion: The Third Period Reassessed 277 Bibliography 281 iii Abstract This thesis provides an analysisof communismin Britain between 1927 and 1932.In theseyears, the CommunistParty of Great Britain (CPGB) embarkedupon a'new period' of political struggle around the concept of class against class.The increasingly draconianmeasures of the Labour Party and trade union bureaucracybetween 1924 and 1927 significantly restricted the scopeof communist influence within the mainstreamlabour As movement. such, the CPGB - in accordancewith the Communist International - attemptedto establishan 'independentleadership' of the working class. The decline in Communist Party membershipthat accompaniedthe'New Line'has led historians to associatean apparentcollapse in CPGB influence with the political perspectiveof class against class. Similarly, the CPGB's initial resistanceto the line has been interpreted as evidenceof the Party's willing subservienceto Moscow. In this thesis, such a portrayal of communist motive and experiencewill be challenged.Instead, a more multifaceted approachwill endeavourto show that: i) the 'left turn' of 1927- 28 complementedattitudes evident in Britain since at least 1926; ii) the simultaneouscollapse in CPGB influence related primarily to the structural changesafflicting Britain (and the British labour movement) between the wars; iii) the period was a difficult but not completely disastrous time for the Party. Rather,the years should be seenas a transitional period, in which the focus of communist activity moved out of the workplace and onto the streets.Thus, the Party's successful mobilisation of the unemployed,and the developmentof an idiosyncratic communist culture, were 'positive' factors. And finally; iv) that the political line pursuedby the CPGB was more flexible and changeablethan IV has hitherto been recognised.The Party continually modified its political strategyand objectives throughout the Third Period. Moreover, the 'sectarianexcesses' that characterisedclass against classwere due in part to the will of the Party rank and file. Many in the Party embracedthe exclusivity of the New Line, and were responsiblefor interpreting the policy'on the ground.' V Abbreviations AEU AmalgamatedEngineering Union BL British Library BUA Bristol UnemployedAssociation BWSF British Workers' SportsFederation cc Central Committee CI Communist International CLC Central Labour College Comintern Communist International CPGB Communist Party of Great Britain CPSU Communist Party of the Soviet Union CPUSA Communist Party of the United Statesof America DMA Durham Miners' Association DMM Dockers' Minority Movement DPC District Party Committee ECCI Executive Committee of the Communist International FKCMA Fife, Kinross and ClackmannanMiners' Association FOSR Friends of Soviet Russia ICWPA International Class War Prisoners'Aid IFTU International Federationof Trade Unions ILP IndependentLabour Party Inprecorr International PressCorrespondence IRA Irish RepublicanArmy JAC Joint Advisory Committee KPD Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands LAI LeagueAgainst Imperialism LPC Local Party Committee vi MFGB Miners' Federationof Great Britain MM Minority Movement MMM Miners'Minority Movement MRM Members'Rights Movement NAC National Administration Council Narkomindel People'sCommissariat of Foreign Affairs NCLC National Council of Labour Colleges NLWM National Left Wing Movement NUGMW National Union of GeneralAnd Municipal Workers N-LJR National Union of Railwaymen NUS National Union of Seamen NUT&GW National Union of Tailors'and Garment Workers NUWCM National Unemployed Workers' Committee Movement NUWM National Unemployed Workers' Movement PAC Public AssistanceCommittee PB Political Bureau PCF Parti CommunisteFrancais PCI Partito Communista,Italiano Profintern Red International of Labour Unions RAPP RussianAssociation of Proletarian Writers RGO Revolutiondre GerwerkschaftsOpposition RILU Red International of Labour Unions RVM Railwaymen'sVigilance Movement SPD SozialdemokratischePartei Deutschlands SWMF South Wales Miners' Federation TGWU Transport and General Workers'Union TMM Textile Minority Movement TUC TradesUnion Congress Vil UCWU United Clothing Workers'Union UMS United Mineworkers'of Scotland USSR Union of Socialist Soviet Republics WCML Working ClassMuseum Library WEB West EuropeanBureau WFS Workers'Film Society WTM Workers'Theatre Movement YCI Young Communist International YCL Young Communist League viii Introduction The Communist Party of Great Britain in the Third Period In an essaydevoted to the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) and the recently openedcommunist archive, Kevin Morgan suggestedthat "if the British Party's history is worth writing at all, it is becauseit often exerciseda political and cultural influence out of all proportion to its size."' This thesis however, while endorsing the essenceof Morgan's assertion,is an attempt to understandthe CPGB in a period generally regardedto be amongstthe most calamitous in the Party's history. Between 1927 and 1932, Communist Party membershipdwindled, its leadership fractured, and many of the links the CPGB had tirelessly establishedwith the wider labour movementwere curtailed. Non-Party allies, such as the miners' leader A. J. Cook, were denouncedas social fascists;joint initiatives establishedwith the trade unions and the Labour left were discontinued; and the CPGB found itself increasingly estrangedfrom both the work environment, and the working class that the Party endeavouredto represent. And yet, although many of the channels through which the Party had carved out a political influence were obstructed during these years, the CPGB remained a significant presence in other important spheres. The Party had become the undisputed leader of the unemployed by the early 1930s, leading national Hunger Marches and helping thousands of workers negotiate the trauma of unemployment at a local level. Also 'on the ground', the CPGB organised social and political events such as football IK. Morgan, 'The CPGB and the Comintern Archives.'In Socialist HistoEyAutumn 1993, P19. leagues,campaigns for free school meals, local news sheetsand aid for striking workers. Similarly, the CP developeda rich educationaland cultural environment.Party schoolswere established;workers' theatreand film groups developedacross the country; and numeroussocial events were organisedto raise money for various communist initiatives. As such, this thesis will examinethe nature of Communist Party influence and support between 1927and 1932,based upon the premisethat: i) 'understandingthe lulls in Party influence are as important to the study of communism in Britain as the various peaks; and ii) that the late 1920sand early 30s were a difficult but not wholly disastroustime for the CPGB- The prevailing view of communist activity in this period is an overwhelmingly negativeone. Historians both sympatheticand hostile to the Party generally agreethat the CPGB suffered during theseyears; and both locate the blame for the Party's apparentdecline in the classagainst by the CP from 1928. Such class policy pursued a policy - which sought to reveal the 'treacherous'role of social democracywhile simultaneously 'independent' leadership establishingan communist of the working class- is seento be inapplicable to the 'objective conditions' prevalent in Britain in the 1920-30s. Furthermore,the policy's proximity to Stalin's consolidation of power within the Soviet Union has further tainted the period as one of growing 'Stalinisation' and communist uniformity. Commentatorshave therefore,either dismissedthe period as an anomaly in the CPGB's developmentand ignored the wider implications of the New Line (as the policy was alternatively called); or stressedthe prominent role played by the Comintern in the implementation of the policy so as to highlight the CPGB's subservienceto Moscow/Stalin. The British Communist Party was brow beateninto submission,the argumentgoes, and suffered as a consequence. 2 Henry Pelling's account of the Third Period, written in the midst of the Cold War, encapsulatessuch a 'traditional' view. "By 1928" writes Pelling, the CPGB's "slavish submissionto Moscow" led to the "barren class against class policy" being forced upon the compliant British