DOCSLIB.ORG

Update on New Nuclear Development: Pickering Community Advisory Council Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Update on New Nuclear Development: Pickering Community Advisory Council Meeting Update on New Nuclear Development: Pickering Community Advisory Council Meeting May 21, 2019 Robin Manley Vice President New Nuclear Development p1 Building our Business through New Nuclear • “Build our Business” is a key enterprise initiative under Financial Strength • Pursuit of new nuclear development is one element • NND mandate includes two parallel paths • Maintain the option for Darlington New Nuclear Project • Pursue small modular reactors as part of OPG’s portfolio p2 Darlington New Nuclear Project Darlington New Nuclear Project • 2012: Environmental assessment (EA) accepted; CNSC granted OPG a 10-year site preparation licence • 2013: DNNP deferred by Province due to lower than expected electricity demand; Province requested OPG maintain licence • Since then, focused on maintaining licence commitments (environmental monitoring, site improvements) • Oct 2018: Submitted licence mid-term report to CNSC • Summarized activities undertaken since licence was granted • Report presented at CNSC public meeting in December 2018 p4 Darlington New Nuclear Project • DNNP site is a significant asset • Province of Ontario: To maintain nuclear in Ontario’s energy supply mix • OPG: Only licensed nuclear site in Canada available for new nuclear build; with approved EA • Licence expires in August 2022 • Renewal process underway • Informed CNSC of our intention to renew • Begun work associated with preparing licence application • Technology-neutral application; monitoring technology developments in industry • Renewed licence will maintain flexibility for future new build p5 options Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) p6 Global Interest in SMRs • Need to balance increasing world-wide demand for energy versus environmental and climate change impacts • No single energy solution = nuclear must be part of the mix Range from community • Smaller: Less than 1 MWe up to 300 MWe scale (<10 • Adaptable: Match load and demand in a scale-to-fit MW) to utility scale approach; generate heat for uses beyond just electricity (~300 MW) Pickering: Claims: 515 MWe • Safety: Enhanced safety features (eg passive safety) net Darlington: • Simpler: Modular designs, reduced project schedules 885 MWe • Cheaper: Lower up-front capital investment; net p7 economies of modularity Canada’s SMR Roadmap • “A Call for Action: A Canadian Roadmap for Small Modular Reactors” • Collaborative report developed by industry representatives, utilities, all level of governments • Outlines framework, applications for SMR deployment in Canada • Released November 2018; the start of the conversation • OPG made significant contributions to the report, chaired many working groups "...Canada is uniquely positioned to lead the world on SMRs. We have experienced nuclear power plant operators— leaders such as New Brunswick Power, Ontario Power Generation, and Bruce Power — who have the know-how needed." p8 Honourable Amarjeet Sohi, Canada's Minister of Natural Resources The Canadian Perspective – Why SMRs? • Long history in Canada – McMaster University, Chalk River’s Nuclear Power Development • Enables Canada to achieve environmental, climate change, social and economic goals • Clean, GHG-free, reliable electricity for heavy industry and remote areas with no access to grid • Reduced reliance on fossil fuels and diesel-generated power • Complements well with existing energy mix, enables renewables • Produces heat energy (not just electricity) for district heating, desalination, heating for greenhouses • Addresses social issues in remote, northern communities Opportunity to leverage 50 years of safe nuclear generation in Canada: known technology, expertise and technical depth, existing supply p9 chain, infrastructure Potential Applications in Canada p10 OPG’s Interest in SMRs 50 years nuclear; • Successful partnerships 100+ hydro • Largest nuclear with Indigenous Positive operator in Canada reputation Communities across • Demonstrated history • Co-operative Ontario of safe operations relationships with site Refurb, RG projects, host communities Nanticoke • Proven project Solar Build our management • Growth opportunity Business success • Potential to move • Technical depth; Expertise beyond Ontario skilled employees from Eagle across Creek p11 OPG SMR at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories • Engaged with Global First Power proposal for SMR commercial demonstration unit at Chalk River • Proposed 15-MWt (approx 5 MWe) high-temperature gas reactor • Serves as a model for future SMRs for heavy industry (mining) • First submission to advance to Phase 3 of CNL’s review process • Application submitted to CNSC for “Licence to Prepare Site” • First-ever regulatory licence application in Canada for SMR • Stakeholder engagement p12 activities have begun Potential Opportunities in the North • Working with OPG’s Business Development group to pursue solutions for the north – heavy industry, remote communities • Reliable, clean power; reducing dependency on diesel • Opportunity to integrate SMRs with renewables, battery storage • Leveraging OPG’s existing relationships and successes in Northern Ontario • ex Gull Bay and other RG projects Gull Bay, Ontario • Engaging with mining companies to determine opportunities, interest • Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada p13 Questions/Discussion p14 Technology Overview and Status p15 SMRs are Happening Now • SMRs of today are based on R&D from the past • 1950s – US Atomic Energy Commission • 1960s/1970s – Nuclear Power Demonstration, McMaster University, Royal Military College • SMRs are being deployed today • Argentina – Light Water Reactor (CAREM-25): under construction • Russia – Floating LWR (KLT-40S): undergoing commissioning • China – High Temp Gas Reactor (HTR-PM): currently fueling • SMR at Idaho National Labs – target in-service by 2026 • SMR at Clinch River, TN – rec’d NRC recommendation for early site permit • 2018 - NRCan led development of pan-Canadian SMR roadmap • A Call to Action: A Canadian Roadmap for Small Modular Reactors • OPG contributed significantly to the development of this report p16 Light Water Reactors (LWR) • Generally evolutions of existing Light Water grid-scale reactors • Use existing LWR fuel at 4.95% enrichment Other Advanced Designs: • Simplified and combined heat transport / pressure vessels into one component CAREM (integral designs) • Argentinian design, 25 MWe commercial • Primary application is grid-scale alternative demo under construction, final product to coal and natural 100MWe gas generation with competitive levelized cost of energy (LCOE) SMaRT • Korean design, certified in Korea, LEAD: NuScale 100 MWe • Derivative of AP1000 Holtec • 50-60Mwe per reactor/ • US Company, focus on deployment Turbine Module, packs of 12 in Asia, 160 MWe (600-700MWe Station Output) • Advanced manufacturing facility in • Undergoing Design New Jersey Certification by USNRC (TCD late 2019) KLT-40S • Selected as FOAK by UAMPS • Russian floating design, construction for deployment at INL ~2024 – complete and under commissioning, COLA in late ‘18/early ’19 40 MWe • Backed by Fluor Inc as Primary Owner of NuScale LLC High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTR) • Based on prototypes and commercial prototypes globally (US, Germany, Japan and China) • Use TRISO fuel pellets from 4.95% to 19.95%: two suppliers (CNFC: China & BWXT: USA) • Helium coolant with fuel in carbon compacts (pebble beds or fixed geometries) • Designed for grid-scale or heavy industry applications • High quality heat can be used for electrical generation or process applications LEADS: • Very High technical readiness HTR-PM • CNNC (China): 100 MWe pebble bed Other Advanced Designs: • Passed heat/pressure tests, StarCore delivered to site in Oct 2018 • StarCore (Canada/US): 20 MWe • State-owned Prismatic design scalable up to 100 MWe • Entered Phase 1 of CNSC VDR and announced MMR-5 plan for commercial demo in Pinawa/WhiteShell • USNC (USA): 5 MWe Prismatic • Entering Phase 2 of CNSC U-Battery Vendor Design Review (VDR) • Urenco (UK): 4 MWe Prismatic design process • Entered Phase 1 of CNSC VDR • Selected by Global First Power • Partnership with Bruce Power for deployment opportunity at Chalk River; OPG named as X-Energy constructor and operator • X-Energy (USA), 70 MWe pebble bed • Licence to prepare site design application submitted to CNSC - • Partnership with US Dept of Energy Marchp18 2019 • Self-funded backed by investors Liquid Sodium Fast Reactors (LSF) • Based on prototypes in the US (mostly from General Electric), France and Japan with commercial plants in Russia • Used advanced metallic or carbide fuels but can use traditional light water reactor fuel • Designed primarily to be breeder/burner reactors for fast fuel cycles • Can span all possible applications from 1 MWe to 1000’s of MWe • High quality heat can be used for electrical generation or process applications • Medium to high technical readiness LEADS: ARC-100 Other Advanced Designs: • ARC (USA), 100 MWe • Phase 1 of CNSC vendor design TWR review • TerraPower (USA): “Traveling Wave” up to 1100 • Partner with New Brunswick MWe government • Partnership with CNNC in China as primary market • Partnership with GE-Hitachi (GEH) • Strong endorsement from Bill Gates PRISM OKLO • GEH (USA): 300 MWe spent fuel • OKLO (US): 1 MWe SMR burner • Engaged in conversations with GEH and • Developed as part of US Dept ARC as cross market application offerings of Energy advanced reactor program BN-600/800 • Substantial pre-certification • Rosatom (Russia) design in operation review by US Nuc Regulatory since 2015 p19 Commission Molten
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bringing American Ingenuity to a Global Nuclear Sector
    TERRAPOWER: BRINGING AMERICAN INGENUITY TO A GLOBAL NUCLEAR SECTOR TerraPower, LLC is a nuclear innovation company headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. The company originated with Bill Gates and a group TerraPower Fast Facts of like-minded visionaries who evaluated the fundamental challenges to Founded: 2008 raising living standards around the world. They recognized energy access was crucial to the health and economic well-being of communities and decided Location: Bellevue, Washington that the private sector needed to act and create energy sources that would advance global development. Full-time employees: 150 Now marking more than 10 years of innovation, TerraPower continues to Supply chain: 80+ contracts worldwide grow and diversify. The multidisciplinary team of approximately 150 full-time Products: professionals has made progress on advanced reactor designs, modeling Traveling Wave Reactor interfaces and future isotope applications. Their dedication and talent help Molten Chloride Fast Reactor TerraPower pursue its vision to be a world leader in new nuclear technologies Medical Radiochemistry Applications that bring the world sustainable, affordable and safe energy, and other high- Innovative Industrial Applications benefit products. The company has put together an impressive aggregate of American suppliers, universities, laboratories and consultants. These partnerships yield significant breakthroughs and shape the foundation of modern supply chains that use nuclear science and technology to the benefit of humanity. GENERATE INITIATE ESTABLISH REFINE DEVELOP DEPLOY IDEAS DESIGN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS CONCEPT PRODUCT ACADEMIA GOVERNMENT PRIVATE SECTOR CREATING A CULTURE THAT INNOVATES TerraPower’s agile business approach leverages the world’s best capabilities and expertise to design and develop nuclear science and technology. Private-sector management, flexibility, funding and efficiency enable TerraPower to accelerate its product deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment
    INL/MIS-15-34247 Small Modular Reactor Design and Deployment Curtis Wright Symposium xx/xx/xxxx www.inl.gov INL SMR Activities • INL works with all vendors to provide fair access to the laboratory benefits • INL works with industry on SMR technology and deployment • INL is supporting multiple LWR SMR vendors – Small, <300MWe reactors and less expensive reactors compared to current LWR reactors (Small) – Often, but not always, multiple reactors at the same site that can be deployed as power is needed (Modular) – Primary cooling system and reactor core in a single containment structure, but not always (Reactors) – Factory built, usually, which improves quality and costs • Integrated PWR SMR’s are closest to deployment – designed to be inherently safer and simple – primary reactor system inside a single factory built containment vessel – Higher dependence on passive systems to simplify operation and design Reactor Power Nuclear Plant Power Los Angeles Class Submarine -26 MW 5000 Enterprise Class Aircraft Carrier 8x 4000 Unit Power Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier 2x97MW, 194MW 3000 Plant Power NuScale Reactor 12 x 150MW, 1800MW 2000 Cooper BWR, 1743MW PowerThermal MW 1000 Westinghouse AP-1000, 3000MW 0 European Pressurized Reactor, 4953MW SMRs are Smaller VC Summer • Power less than 300MWe. Dearater – Current Plants 1000MWe – Physically smaller – Fewer inputs – Fits on power grid with less infrastructure – Built in a factory – Simplified designs VC Summer • Passive systems Core • Fewer components NuScale Reactor Multiple Units • SMR Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates
    PNNL-25978 Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates November 2016 SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as an account of work sponsored by Alberta Innovates (“AI”). Neither AI, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), DOE, the U.S. Government, nor any person acting on their behalf makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by AI, PNNL, DOE, or the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of AI, PNNL, DOE or the U.S. Government. Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) November 2016 Prepared for Alberta Innovates (AI) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary At present, the steam requirements of Alberta’s heavy oil industry and the Province’s electricity requirements are predominantly met by natural gas and coal, respectively. On November 22, 2015 the Government of Alberta announced its Climate Change Leadership Plan to 1) phase out all pollution created by burning coal and transition to more renewable energy and natural gas generation by 2030 and 2) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oil sands operations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • "U.S. Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge." (Pdf)
    US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation And The Strategic Global Challenge Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on US Nuclear Energy Leadership Honorary Co-Chairs Senator Mike Crapo Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Rapporteur Dr. Robert F. Ichord, Jr. Co-Directors Randolph Bell Dr. Jennifer T. Gordon Ellen Scholl ATLANTIC COUNCIL 1 US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge 2 ATLANTIC COUNCIL US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation And The Strategic Global Challenge Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on US Nuclear Energy Leadership Honorary Co-Chairs Senator Mike Crapo Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Rapporteur Dr. Robert F. Ichord, Jr. Co-Directors Randolph Bell Dr. Jennifer T. Gordon Ellen Scholl ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-589-3 Cover: A US flag flutters in front of cooling towers at the Limerick Generating Station in Pottstown, Penn- sylvania May 24, 2006. US President George W. Bush briefly toured the nuclear facility and spoke about energy and the economy. Source: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. May 2019 ATLANTIC COUNCIL I US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge II ATLANTIC COUNCIL US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT BY HONORARY CO-CHAIRS 2 TASK FORCE MEMBERS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Design and Optimization of the High Conversion Small Modular Reactor
    Technische Universität München Fakultät für Maschinenwesen Lehrstuhl für Nukleartechnik Core Design and Optimization of the High Conversion Small Modular Reactor Denis Janin Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Maschinenwesen der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis, PhD Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Rafael Macián-Juan, PhD 2. Prof. Dr. Jean-Baptiste Thomas Die Dissertation wurde am 08.05.2018 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Maschinenwesen am 01.11.2018 angenommen. ABSTRACT This research work investigates the design and optimization of the high conversion small modular reactor (HCSMR) core. The HCSMR has a thermal output of 600 MW for 200 MW electrical. It is an integrated PWR with a tightened fuel assembly lattice. The rod-to-rod pitch is 1.15 cm in a hexagonal fuel assembly geometry. As a result the moderation ratio (1.0) is reduced compared to large PWRs (around 2.0) and the HCSMR has an improved ability to convert 238U into 239Pu and use plutonium isotopes more efficiently. The core is loaded with MOX fuel. The HCSMR concept finds its roots both in large high conversion light water reactors and small modular reactor (SMR) concepts. The reduced core size results in an increased neutron leakage rate compared to large cores. This intrinsically supports the core behavior in voided situations. The necessity to introduce fertile fuel materials in the core to keep negative void coefficients is reduced, contributing to the HCSMR safety and limited core heterogeneity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Terrapower Public Letterhead
    June 8, 2021 TP-LIC-LET-0005 Project Number 99902087 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Document Control Desk Subject: Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium™ Reactor This letter transmits the TerraPower, LLC (TerraPower) Regulatory Engagement Plan. The plan is provided for information and outlines proposed interactions with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) associated with the Natrium™ Reactor. The Natrium design is a TerraPower and GE-Hitachi technology. The Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor, Enclosure 1, includes anticipated future dates for interactions or submittals, changes will be communicated to the NRC in advance. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ryan Sprengel at [email protected] or (425) 324-2888. Sincerely, Ryan Sprengel License Application Development Manager TerraPower, LLC Enclosure: 1. Natrium Reactor Regulatory Engagement Plan cc: William Kennedy, NRC Mallecia Sutton, NRC 15800 Northup Way, Bellevue, WA 98008 www.TerraPower.com P. +1 (425) 324-2888 F. +1 (425) 324-2889 ENCLOSURE 1 Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor Controlled Document - Verify Current Revision PLAN Document Number: NATD-LIC-PLAN-0001 Revision: 0 Document Title: Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor Engineering Functional Area: Licensing N/A Discipline: Effective Date: 6/7/2021 Released Date: 6/7/2021 Page: 1 of 17 Approval Title Name Signature Date Originator, License Application Development Ryan Sprengel Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Manager Reviewer, Director George Wilson Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Regulatory Affairs Approver, Project Director Natrium Demonstration Tara Neider Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Reactor ☒ Export Controlled Content: Yes ☐ No ☒ QA Related: Yes ☐ No QA Criterion: N/A SUBJECT TO DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Engineering
    Academic Program Review Self-Study Report February 8-11, 2015 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary of the Self-Study Report ..................................................... 1 A. Message from the Department Head and Graduate Program Adviser ................................ 1 B. Charge to the External Review Team .................................................................................. 2 II. Introduction to Department ..................................................................................3 A. Brief departmental history ................................................................................................... 3 B. Mission and goals ................................................................................................................ 3 C. Administrative structure ...................................................................................................... 4 D. Advisory Council ................................................................................................................. 7 E. Department and program resources ..................................................................................... 8 1. Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 8 2. Institutes and Centers ..................................................................................................... 11 3. Finances ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Small and Medium Sized Reactor Designs
    STATUS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED REACTOR DESIGNS A Supplement to the IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) http://aris.iaea.org @ September 2012 STATUS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED REACTOR DESIGNS A Supplement to the IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) http://aris.iaea.org FOREWORD There is renewed interest in Member States grids and lower rates of increase in demand. in the development and application of small They are designed with modular technology, and medium sized reactors (SMRs) having an pursuing economies of series production, factory equivalent electric power of less than 700 MW(e) fabrication and short construction times. The or even less than 300 MW(e). At present, most projected timelines of readiness for deployment new nuclear power plants under construction of SMR designs generally range from the present or in operation are large, evolutionary designs to 2025–2030. with power levels of up to 1700 MW(e), The objective of this booklet is to provide building on proven systems while incorporating Member States, including those considering technological advances. The considerable initiating a nuclear power programme and those development work on small to medium sized already having practical experience in nuclear designs generally aims to provide increased power, with a brief introduction to the IAEA benefits in the areas of safety and security, non- Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) proliferation, waste management, and resource by presenting a balanced and objective overview utilization and economy, as well as to offer a of the status of SMR designs. variety of energy products and flexibility in This report is intended as a supplementary design, siting and fuel cycle options.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements
    INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 Idaho National Laboratory Nuclear Systems Design & Analysis Division Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Under U.S. Department of Energy-Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Forward The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) requested an assessment of global nuclear markets, including the structure of nuclear companies in different countries and the partnerships between reactor vendors and buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66
    University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Alumni Magazines Law School History and Publications Fall 2012 uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66, (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum/11 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School History and Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni Magazines by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nonprofit Org US Postage 66 PAID L eaders for the Seattle, WA E Permit No. 62 M BOX 353020 SEATTLE, WA 98195-3020 U Global Common Good L 2012 VO 2012 L A F L uw uwlaw uwlaw CALENDAR FALL - WINTER - SPRING 2012 - 2013 law OCTOBER 29 FEBRUARY 8 M ARCH 29 – 30 Betts Patterson Mines T owards Global Food Law: 20th Annual NW Dispute Professor of Law Eric Schnapper, Transatlantic Competition and Resolution Conference FALL 2012 VOLUME 66 Installation & Reception Collaboration Conference A PRIL 24 N OVEMBER 1 FEBRUARY 22 NYC Alumni Breakfast Portland Alumni Reception TEI & UW Law Tax Conference A PRIL 25 N OVEMBER 7 Annual Public Interest Law DC Alumni Reception Senior Alumni Student Presentation Association Benefit Auction M AY 31 JA NUARY 11 – 13 & 26 – 27 FEBRUARY 27 Anchorage Alumni Reception Professional Mediation Skills Pendleton Miller Chair in Law Training Program Stewart Jay, Installation & Reception JUNE 9 UW School of Law Commencement JA NUARY 14 M ARCH 6 Garvey Schubert Barer Professor UW Law Foundation Professor Join us on LinkedIn (search for of Law Kathryn A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
    Fundamentals of Nuclear Power Juan S. Giraldo Douglas J. Gotham David G. Nderitu Paul V. Preckel Darla J. Mize State Utility Forecasting Group December 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... v Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... vi Foreword ........................................................................................................................................ vii 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Current state of nuclear power generation in the U.S. ......................................... 1 1.2 Nuclear power around the world ........................................................................... 4 2. Nuclear Energy .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 How nuclear power plants generate electricity ..................................................... 9 2.2 Radioactive decay .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]