DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Engineering Academic Program Review Self-Study Report February 8-11, 2015 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary of the Self-Study Report ..................................................... 1 A. Message from the Department Head and Graduate Program Adviser ................................ 1 B. Charge to the External Review Team .................................................................................. 2 II. Introduction to Department ..................................................................................3 A. Brief departmental history ................................................................................................... 3 B. Mission and goals ................................................................................................................ 3 C. Administrative structure ...................................................................................................... 4 D. Advisory Council ................................................................................................................. 7 E. Department and program resources ..................................................................................... 8 1. Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 8 2. Institutes and Centers ..................................................................................................... 11 3. Finances ......................................................................................................................... 13 F. External program accreditations ........................................................................................ 13 G. Date of last APR external review ...................................................................................... 13 H. Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 13 III. Academic Programs and Curricula ....................................................................15 A. Programs offered ............................................................................................................... 15 B. Program curricula .............................................................................................................. 15 1. Master of Science in Nuclear Engineering .................................................................... 15 2. Master of Engineering in Nuclear Engineering ............................................................. 19 3. Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering ........................................................................................ 19 C. Admissions criteria (doctoral students) ............................................................................. 20 D. Number of degrees awarded per year (most recent five years) ......................................... 23 E. Average time to degree (most recent five years) ............................................................... 24 F. Academic enhancements / high-impact opportunities for students ................................... 25 G. Assessment of student learning outcomes ......................................................................... 25 H. Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 26 IV. Faculty Profile ....................................................................................................28 A. Core faculty ....................................................................................................................... 28 1. Number .......................................................................................................................... 28 i 2. Core faculty / student ratio ............................................................................................. 28 3. Publications (most recent five years) ............................................................................. 28 4. External grants (most recent five years) ........................................................................ 29 5. Teaching load ................................................................................................................. 29 B. Faculty other than core ...................................................................................................... 29 C. Faculty diversity ................................................................................................................ 30 D. Faculty qualifications and recognitions ............................................................................. 31 E. Metrics ............................................................................................................................... 35 F. Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 37 V. Student Profile ....................................................................................................38 A. Doctoral students ............................................................................................................... 38 1. Enrollment, including percentage of full-time students ................................................. 38 2. Student diversity / demographics ................................................................................... 39 3. Retention rates ............................................................................................................... 41 4. Graduation rates ............................................................................................................. 41 5. Average time to degree (most recent five years) ........................................................... 42 6. Average institutional financial support provided ........................................................... 43 7. Percentage of full-time students with institutional financial support ............................ 43 8. Student publications / presentations (most recent five years) ........................................ 44 9. Employment profile (in field within one year of graduation; most recent five years) .. 44 B. All other students ............................................................................................................... 47 1. Student diversity / demographics ................................................................................... 47 2. Retention Rates .............................................................................................................. 48 3. Graduation Rates ............................................................................................................ 49 C. Graduate placement / employment .................................................................................... 50 D. Student awards ................................................................................................................... 55 E. Student professional development ..................................................................................... 59 VI. Concluding Observations ...................................................................................61 Appendix A. 18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs (2012) ........................... 63 Appendix B. Weave Online Entries .......................................................................................... 66 Appendix C. College of Engineering Annual Diversity Plan Accountability Report .............102 Appendix D. Nuclear Engineering Academic Analytics Report ............................................. 108 ii Appendix E. Growth Plan ....................................................................................................... 118 Appendix F. Nuclear Engineering Fact Sheet......................................................................... 154 Appendix G. 2007 Academic Program Review ...................................................................... 156 Appendix H. 2011 Academic Program Review Update ......................................................... 169 iii Table of Tables Table 1. Requirements for the Ph.D. degree plan (for students without Master’s degree)* ......... 19 Table 2. Requirements for the Ph.D. degree plan (for students with Master’s degree)* .............. 19 Table 3. Number of Earned Degrees by Academic Year .............................................................. 24 Table 4. Doctoral Graduation Data ............................................................................................... 24 Table 5. Master’s Graduation Data ............................................................................................... 25 Table 6. Texas A&M Nuclear Engineering Graduate Program Rankings.................................... 27 Table 7. Core Faculty to Graduate Enrollment Ratio ................................................................... 28 Table 8. Faculty Publications ........................................................................................................ 29 Table 9. Faculty Research Expenditures ....................................................................................... 29 Table 10. Faculty Other Than Core to Graduate Enrollment Ratio .............................................. 30 Table 11. Core Faculty Diversity .................................................................................................. 31 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bringing American Ingenuity to a Global Nuclear Sector
    TERRAPOWER: BRINGING AMERICAN INGENUITY TO A GLOBAL NUCLEAR SECTOR TerraPower, LLC is a nuclear innovation company headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. The company originated with Bill Gates and a group TerraPower Fast Facts of like-minded visionaries who evaluated the fundamental challenges to Founded: 2008 raising living standards around the world. They recognized energy access was crucial to the health and economic well-being of communities and decided Location: Bellevue, Washington that the private sector needed to act and create energy sources that would advance global development. Full-time employees: 150 Now marking more than 10 years of innovation, TerraPower continues to Supply chain: 80+ contracts worldwide grow and diversify. The multidisciplinary team of approximately 150 full-time Products: professionals has made progress on advanced reactor designs, modeling Traveling Wave Reactor interfaces and future isotope applications. Their dedication and talent help Molten Chloride Fast Reactor TerraPower pursue its vision to be a world leader in new nuclear technologies Medical Radiochemistry Applications that bring the world sustainable, affordable and safe energy, and other high- Innovative Industrial Applications benefit products. The company has put together an impressive aggregate of American suppliers, universities, laboratories and consultants. These partnerships yield significant breakthroughs and shape the foundation of modern supply chains that use nuclear science and technology to the benefit of humanity. GENERATE INITIATE ESTABLISH REFINE DEVELOP DEPLOY IDEAS DESIGN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS CONCEPT PRODUCT ACADEMIA GOVERNMENT PRIVATE SECTOR CREATING A CULTURE THAT INNOVATES TerraPower’s agile business approach leverages the world’s best capabilities and expertise to design and develop nuclear science and technology. Private-sector management, flexibility, funding and efficiency enable TerraPower to accelerate its product deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC １．DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体／海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software ２．Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Geometry Options for a Moderated Low-Enriched Uranium Kilowatt-Class Space Nuclear Reactor T ⁎ Leonardo De Holanda Mencarinia,B,Jeffrey C
    Nuclear Engineering and Design 340 (2018) 122–132 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Nuclear Engineering and Design journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nucengdes Fuel geometry options for a moderated low-enriched uranium kilowatt-class space nuclear reactor T ⁎ Leonardo de Holanda Mencarinia,b,Jeffrey C. Kinga, a Nuclear Science and Engineering Program, Colorado School of Mines (CSM), 1500 Illinois St, Hill Hall, 80401 Golden, CO, USA b Subdivisão de Dados Nucleares - Instituto de Estudos Avançados (IEAv), Trevo Coronel Aviador José Alberto Albano do Amarante, n 1, 12228-001 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil ABSTRACT A LEU-fueled space reactor would avoid the security concerns inherent with Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) fuel and could be attractive to signatory countries of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or commercial interests. The HEU-fueled Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling Technology (KRUSTY) serves as a basis for a similar reactor fueled with LEU fuel. Based on MCNP6™ neutronics performance estimates, the size of a 5 kWe reactor fueled with 19.75 wt% enriched uranium-10 wt% molybdenum alloy fuel is adjusted to match the excess reactivity of KRUSTY. Then, zirconium hydride moderator is added to the core in four different configurations (a homogeneous fuel/moderator mixture and spherical, disc, and helical fuel geometries) to reduce the mass of uranium required to produce the same excess reactivity, decreasing the size of the reactor. The lowest mass reactor with a given moderator represents a balance between the reflector thickness and core diameter needed to maintain the multiplication factor equal to 1.035, with a H/D ratio of 1.81.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation
    Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation Technical Issues that Need to Be Addressed in Preparing for a Nationwide Effort to Transport Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste A Report to the U.S. Congress and the Secretary of Energy September 2019 U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation Technical Issues That Need to Be Addressed in Preparing for a Nationwide Effort to Transport Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste A Report to the U.S. Congress and the Secretary of Energy September 2019 This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Jean M. Bahr, Ph.D., Chair University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Steven M. Becker, Ph.D. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia Susan L. Brantley, Ph.D. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania Allen G. Croff, Nuclear Engineer, M.B.A. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee Efi Foufoula-Georgiou, Ph.D. University of California Irvine, Irvine, California Tissa Illangasekare, Ph.D., P.E. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado Kenneth Lee Peddicord, Ph.D., P.E. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas Paul J. Turinsky, Ph.D. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Mary Lou Zoback, Ph.D. Stanford University, Stanford, California Note: Dr. Linda Nozick of Cornell University served as a Board member from July 28, 2011, to May 9, 2019. During that time, Dr. Nozick provided valuable contributions to this report. iii This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Staff Executive Staff Nigel Mote Executive Director Neysa Slater-Chandler Director of Administration Senior Professional Staff* Bret W.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates
    PNNL-25978 Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates November 2016 SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as an account of work sponsored by Alberta Innovates (“AI”). Neither AI, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), DOE, the U.S. Government, nor any person acting on their behalf makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by AI, PNNL, DOE, or the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of AI, PNNL, DOE or the U.S. Government. Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) November 2016 Prepared for Alberta Innovates (AI) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary At present, the steam requirements of Alberta’s heavy oil industry and the Province’s electricity requirements are predominantly met by natural gas and coal, respectively. On November 22, 2015 the Government of Alberta announced its Climate Change Leadership Plan to 1) phase out all pollution created by burning coal and transition to more renewable energy and natural gas generation by 2030 and 2) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oil sands operations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • "U.S. Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge." (Pdf)
    US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation And The Strategic Global Challenge Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on US Nuclear Energy Leadership Honorary Co-Chairs Senator Mike Crapo Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Rapporteur Dr. Robert F. Ichord, Jr. Co-Directors Randolph Bell Dr. Jennifer T. Gordon Ellen Scholl ATLANTIC COUNCIL 1 US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge 2 ATLANTIC COUNCIL US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation And The Strategic Global Challenge Report of the Atlantic Council Task Force on US Nuclear Energy Leadership Honorary Co-Chairs Senator Mike Crapo Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Rapporteur Dr. Robert F. Ichord, Jr. Co-Directors Randolph Bell Dr. Jennifer T. Gordon Ellen Scholl ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-589-3 Cover: A US flag flutters in front of cooling towers at the Limerick Generating Station in Pottstown, Penn- sylvania May 24, 2006. US President George W. Bush briefly toured the nuclear facility and spoke about energy and the economy. Source: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. May 2019 ATLANTIC COUNCIL I US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge II ATLANTIC COUNCIL US Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT BY HONORARY CO-CHAIRS 2 TASK FORCE MEMBERS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Terrapower Public Letterhead
    June 8, 2021 TP-LIC-LET-0005 Project Number 99902087 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Document Control Desk Subject: Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium™ Reactor This letter transmits the TerraPower, LLC (TerraPower) Regulatory Engagement Plan. The plan is provided for information and outlines proposed interactions with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) associated with the Natrium™ Reactor. The Natrium design is a TerraPower and GE-Hitachi technology. The Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor, Enclosure 1, includes anticipated future dates for interactions or submittals, changes will be communicated to the NRC in advance. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ryan Sprengel at [email protected] or (425) 324-2888. Sincerely, Ryan Sprengel License Application Development Manager TerraPower, LLC Enclosure: 1. Natrium Reactor Regulatory Engagement Plan cc: William Kennedy, NRC Mallecia Sutton, NRC 15800 Northup Way, Bellevue, WA 98008 www.TerraPower.com P. +1 (425) 324-2888 F. +1 (425) 324-2889 ENCLOSURE 1 Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor Controlled Document - Verify Current Revision PLAN Document Number: NATD-LIC-PLAN-0001 Revision: 0 Document Title: Regulatory Engagement Plan for the Natrium Reactor Engineering Functional Area: Licensing N/A Discipline: Effective Date: 6/7/2021 Released Date: 6/7/2021 Page: 1 of 17 Approval Title Name Signature Date Originator, License Application Development Ryan Sprengel Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Manager Reviewer, Director George Wilson Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Regulatory Affairs Approver, Project Director Natrium Demonstration Tara Neider Electronically Signed in Agile 6/7/2021 Reactor ☒ Export Controlled Content: Yes ☐ No ☒ QA Related: Yes ☐ No QA Criterion: N/A SUBJECT TO DOE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66
    University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Alumni Magazines Law School History and Publications Fall 2012 uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66, (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum/11 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School History and Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni Magazines by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nonprofit Org US Postage 66 PAID L eaders for the Seattle, WA E Permit No. 62 M BOX 353020 SEATTLE, WA 98195-3020 U Global Common Good L 2012 VO 2012 L A F L uw uwlaw uwlaw CALENDAR FALL - WINTER - SPRING 2012 - 2013 law OCTOBER 29 FEBRUARY 8 M ARCH 29 – 30 Betts Patterson Mines T owards Global Food Law: 20th Annual NW Dispute Professor of Law Eric Schnapper, Transatlantic Competition and Resolution Conference FALL 2012 VOLUME 66 Installation & Reception Collaboration Conference A PRIL 24 N OVEMBER 1 FEBRUARY 22 NYC Alumni Breakfast Portland Alumni Reception TEI & UW Law Tax Conference A PRIL 25 N OVEMBER 7 Annual Public Interest Law DC Alumni Reception Senior Alumni Student Presentation Association Benefit Auction M AY 31 JA NUARY 11 – 13 & 26 – 27 FEBRUARY 27 Anchorage Alumni Reception Professional Mediation Skills Pendleton Miller Chair in Law Training Program Stewart Jay, Installation & Reception JUNE 9 UW School of Law Commencement JA NUARY 14 M ARCH 6 Garvey Schubert Barer Professor UW Law Foundation Professor Join us on LinkedIn (search for of Law Kathryn A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Source Is Published Annually by the Department of Nuclear Engineering at the University of Tennessee
    THESOURCE ALUMNI MAGAZINE • FALL 2018 The Right Stuff to Propel us to MARSpage 12 A Department on the Rise • Traveling to Mars • Nuclear Pinch Hitter From the Department Head Table of CONTENTS Department Head Message 1 Best of the Best 2 Department sets new record for PhD graduates in 2018 Before, During, and After the Bomb 6 John Auxier II prepares for the unthinkable Pinch-Hitter & Nuclear Grandpa 8 Lawrence Heilbronn is always on deck for students Moving On Up 10 Faculty and staff move up the Hill to make room for new facilities 2 On a Scientific Mission to Mars 12 Going nuclear to get to Mars PULSR Powers the Road to Mars 14 Senior design project powers a 20-year mission Coble Maintains Winning Faculty Energy 15 Coble recognized with university and ANS awards DEPARTMENTS This is a truly exciting time for us here on Rocky Top. When I say we grew out of our building, I really mean Faculty Notes 16 14 The university recently welcomed its largest freshman it. Last year, we had 368 students, our largest class Staff Notes 17 class and the quality of students is amazing. The Tickle ever. Our 132 PhD students was the largest nuclear Student Notes 18 College of Engineering also welcomed its largest- engineering PhD student class in the history of the ever freshman class, including a record percentage United States. Additionally, we graduated 24 PhDs, First Step Awards 20 of women. As for our department, we have 56 new which was the largest graduating class in US history, and Community Outreach 22 freshmen with 20 percent bringing in enough AP credits yes, they are all getting challenging jobs at government Around the Department 24 to make them sophomores and an average math ACT agencies, universities, and in industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Engineering
    WHAT CAN I DO WITH A MAJOR IN … NUCLEAR ENGINEERING OCCUPATIONAL SUMMARY: The UNM Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering (2013) describes the field of nuclear engineering as “an exciting, rapidly-evolving field which requires engineers with an understanding of physical processes of nuclear energy and an ability to apply concepts in new and creative ways. Nuclear engineers are primarily concerned with the control, monitoring, and use of energy released in nuclear processes.” The department goes on to explain that, “some nuclear engineers work on the design and safety aspects of environmentally-sound, passively safe nuclear fission reactors. Others are looking to future energy solutions through development and implementation of nuclear fusion systems. Others are helping in the exploration and utilization of outer space by developing long term, reliable nuclear energy sources. With the renewed concern in environmental science, nuclear engineers are working on safe disposal concepts for radioactive waste and on methods for reduction of radiation releases from industrial facilities. They also work in developing a wide variety of applications for radioisotopes such as the treatment and diagnosis of diseases, food preservation, manufacturing development, processing and quality control, and biological and mechanical process tracers. For each of these fields there are numerous opportunities for nuclear engineers in basic research, applications, operations, and training.” EMPLOYMENT REQUIRMENTS: The Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) explains that a bachelor's degree in nuclear engineering is the minimum formal education required to work as a nuclear engineer. BLS further explains that many employers value practical experience, making it important for nuclear engineering students to participate in internships and Co-ops while completing their degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Radiological Engineering and the Medical Physics Programs 2004-2005
    THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NUCLEAR AND RADIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND THE MEDICAL PHYSICS PROGRAMS 2004-2005 George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MESSAGE FROM THE LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF WOODRUFF SCHOOL CHAIR THE NRE AND MP PROGRAMS Dear Friends: Dear Colleagues and Friends: We are pleased to bring you Welcome to the fourth edition of the another annual report of the annual report for the Nuclear and Nuclear and Radiological Radiological Engineering and Medical Engineering and Medical Physics Physics (NRE/MP) Programs. The Programs of the George W. NRE/MP programs enjoy a healthy Woodruff School. This report enrollment of 146 undergraduate and 73 covers the academic year ending graduate students. These correspond to in June 2005. enrollment increases of 62 percent and 70 This was another very percent, respectively, since fall 2002, soon successful year for the Nuclear after the reorganization of the program. and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs. We Two factors contributing to the enrollment trend are the increased have again experienced significant increases in enrollment at both student recruiting effort by the faculty and the undergraduate the undergraduate and graduate levels. In the undergraduate scholarship program funded by our industry sponsors and the program, nuclear engineering enrollment is rapidly growing as a Department of Energy matching grant. Additionally, the sponsored result of the quality of our programs and the increased interest in funds have helped us attract high quality students into the program. the country in nuclear power as a possible solution to meeting the Fall 2005 is the start of the second year of the Georgia Tech country's energy needs as well as helping with environmental and Emory University cooperative on-campus and distance learning issues.
    [Show full text]